❖ Newton's Method ❖

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 2 лют 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 404

  • @zachblanc2776
    @zachblanc2776 10 років тому +345

    Gotta love when youtube videos explain calc better than your college professor.

    • @JimmyThePhysicist
      @JimmyThePhysicist 7 років тому +10

      this is numerical analyze it's not calculus

    • @robbcabaian
      @robbcabaian 7 років тому +3

      Ye. Mine sounds like he gargles marbles. Also types on the computer one finger at a time. I often wonder how long it takes him to code...

    • @Hi_Brien
      @Hi_Brien 5 років тому +1

      Ya gotta love not having a calc professor... youtube becomes your only teacher... SOO effective

    • @adamshafer2360
      @adamshafer2360 4 роки тому

      *chuckle* I'm only in 5th grade :) I don't get what's so difficult about this. Am I smart or are you dumb? It's simple.

    • @awesomecodeyay8382
      @awesomecodeyay8382 4 роки тому +1

      Adam Shafer. Lol, you’re not smart. I’m done with math and I finished it in 6th grade. I’m current teaching my 5th grade brother. Anyone any age can finish calculus by simply indulging yourself in the mindset of perceiving ideas as easy. That’s how I finished multi variable in a month. Lol, multiple integrals and partial derivatives were just tiny pieces of CAKE!!! I also finished AP physics and AP chemistry and I’m looking forward to finishing more AP classes. I don’t know if it’s just my own idiosyncratic way of learning though, my siblings just don’t seem to understand my way of learning and memorizing. Anyways, you were just talking to an IMO (International Mathematics Olympiad) participant and a 3X Mathcounts finalist who finished all of calculus within months so...BYE. By the way, I’m not flexing.

  • @darkflyes
    @darkflyes 13 років тому +16

    I'm the kind of guy who relies heavily on step by step examples and equations while doing my work. The video was really helpful, I hope you make many more like this. Thanks a lot!

  • @sebastiancurry3714
    @sebastiancurry3714 3 роки тому +8

    you save engineering students lol. I have time to hit the gym and pursue my passion for bodybuilding because I can watch your videos instead of reading through the textbook for hours lol. Gotta love UA-cam. Obviously youtube cant always grasp the level of difficulty of practice problems they give you engineering cause they make it alot harder, its still extremely helpful to understand the concept as quickly as possible instead of using a textbook lmaoo, then from there you can just practice harder problems of the same concept.

  • @CameronS437
    @CameronS437 9 років тому +71

    Throwback to the days when there was a time limit to these videos

  • @KryatLore
    @KryatLore 13 років тому +8

    Great explanation! You made me understand in 7:30 minutes what my teacher couldn't in 2 classes 1:40 hours each!
    Thanks a lot!

  • @bryant4707
    @bryant4707 10 років тому +208

    Some night-before Calculus final cramming :)

    • @RyantheCanuckpirate
      @RyantheCanuckpirate 9 років тому

      James Cook lol I'm in this exact same position. Luckily for me, only this and parametric curves to go! yay

    • @endod8708
      @endod8708 8 років тому

      me too XD

    • @Kurse_of_Kall
      @Kurse_of_Kall 7 років тому +2

      Some -night- class-before Calculus final cramming :)

    • @Kurse_of_Kall
      @Kurse_of_Kall 7 років тому

      It's cool guys I aced it.

    • @xInsaneJuggernautx
      @xInsaneJuggernautx 7 років тому

      Same

  • @patrickjmt
    @patrickjmt  16 років тому +6

    glad you like it! i just added this one yesterdaY!

  • @siddharthsingh7747
    @siddharthsingh7747 9 років тому +34

    "This is not the end of the world"
    Wise words.

  • @RedRogue
    @RedRogue 11 років тому +25

    Oh thank god.
    I've been studying for my calculus final (which is tomorrow) and Newton's Method is the only thing I've been having trouble understanding.
    "What is this? Why am I using this?? WHAT DOES THIS MEAN!?!"
    Yeah my textbook's not very good, and the teacher didn't really go over it well. Seriously though, you're a life saver.

    • @ssssssssssurvey
      @ssssssssssurvey 10 років тому +51

      god i wish newtons method is my only trouble...

    • @krylite11
      @krylite11 4 роки тому

      What you upto now, 6 years later?

  • @ezrarebollar9299
    @ezrarebollar9299 6 років тому +1

    3rd year math major here just love you to death patrick...... been using your videos since i was a freshman and never dissapointed in your variety of subjects or skill in teaching.

  • @jona1935
    @jona1935 10 років тому +1

    Great job, my professor forgot to go over this for an exam i have tomorrow. You just saved me :D

  • @joakimt3941
    @joakimt3941 10 років тому +2

    You are amazing at explaining maths in a pedagogical way! Thank you so much for your work! The textbook that I use explained this disastrously!

  • @svenn994
    @svenn994 11 років тому

    Thank you! Both the Calculus textbook and my math teacher failed to explain this so that i could understand it, and you did it in about 60 seconds!

  • @quinnjones2886
    @quinnjones2886 2 роки тому

    From the four Newton's Method videos I just watched yours is the best by far. The visualization at the beginning was very helpful. Your video even beat The Organic Chemistry Teacher's video!

  • @stevenf1384
    @stevenf1384 7 років тому +4

    1 minute in and I already got the concept faster than what took my prof an hour to explain

  • @Hackiesacker007
    @Hackiesacker007 14 років тому +1

    @patrickJMT We weren't allowed to use calculators, but it turns out we weren't tested on Newton's method anyway! I can't thank you enough for all your help with these tutorial videos. My math professor is absolutely horrid, and after watching these videos for the past 8 hours or so(I just got back from my exam 20 min ago after pulling an all nighter), I feel like I aced my exam. Thanks again!!

  • @patrickjmt
    @patrickjmt  12 років тому

    how does your calculator find it?

  • @catalindeluxus8545
    @catalindeluxus8545 5 років тому

    A BIG thank you from 2020! You explained Newton's method clearly and concisely, despite English not being my first language! Hope I do well on my midterm tomorrow!

  • @markmelinski1033
    @markmelinski1033 5 років тому +1

    Thank you for all of your videos, they’ve really made a huge difference in my life by allowing me to peruse mechanical engineering.

  • @DeeWoco
    @DeeWoco 11 років тому

    You are literally the savior of all calc students.

  • @5jktm
    @5jktm 11 років тому

    You are a real lifesaver for people with professors that can't teach

  • @nelsonwetmore
    @nelsonwetmore 12 років тому

    Patrick, you are the reason I am passing Calc right now. You are a life saver.

  • @shawnpavlik1293
    @shawnpavlik1293 7 років тому

    Hey, Patrick, thanks for this. I am teaching Calc for the first time this year, and had forgotten how this works. Now I feel like I can explain in great detail.

    • @patrickjmt
      @patrickjmt  7 років тому

      happy i could help :) good luck with the teaching!

  • @SeriousPony
    @SeriousPony 5 років тому

    Had to quickly remember Numerical Analysis material despite being out of practice for almost 5 years. Very clear explanations and examples! God bless!

  • @LiciaCOG
    @LiciaCOG 12 років тому

    I don't know what it is but UA-cam videos are almost always more helpful thank class. I appreciate you taking out your time to make this video! THANK YOU

  • @TheXoftware
    @TheXoftware 13 років тому

    Thanks Patrick. Really love watching your videos, they are a great supplement to my math teacher when I am at home doing my homework! I try to make your sure I give you a thumbs up every time I watch your videos.

  • @patrickjmt
    @patrickjmt  13 років тому

    @TheNumber2Pencil546 thanks for liking them!

  • @11baroda
    @11baroda 10 років тому

    Bro you have saved my life
    My calculus mid-year is in 4 days and this along with a couple other of ur vids hav gotten me a lot more confident
    Cheers

  • @LadyDancer55
    @LadyDancer55 14 років тому

    Very very useful, better than my maths teacher really. You really know what you're saying and how to bring it across and it's simple in just under 10 minutes. Brilliant.
    Though we use excel to help us with it, but still this makes me understand it more rather than being alienated by TECHNOLOGY!! Cheers!!

  • @kimin8864
    @kimin8864 12 років тому

    As soon as I opened this chapter, I was so confused. But after watching your video, I understood a lot about Newton's Method. Thank you very much for the video.

  • @wolfmode69
    @wolfmode69 5 років тому

    I mean it when i say I love you. You're a lifesaver and your teaching is the best.

  • @Gchwow
    @Gchwow 12 років тому

    I had no idea what was going on when this was discussed in class but after the first 90 seconds I think I really get it now. Thanks!

  • @patrickjmt
    @patrickjmt  14 років тому +2

    @Hackiesacker007 ha, good luck on the exam! : )
    and yes, i think to actually do the computations, a calculator would be very handy.

  • @sifisoshabangu4694
    @sifisoshabangu4694 11 років тому

    Job well done man, i just understood something ive been trying to read the whole day in just 7:29 minutes, Thanks again man..................

  • @patrickjmt
    @patrickjmt  16 років тому +1

    well, just start by finding equations of tangent lines, and solve for the x-intercept of those lines; you will get the formula!

  • @skaaddict2
    @skaaddict2 12 років тому

    Wow the introductory explanation of the purpose of newton's method was excellent. I could not visualize what the point of it was. I know it's aim is to find the root but the depiction of how it does just that made it make sense. Thank you.

  • @connorp8408
    @connorp8408 11 років тому

    I have yet to find a kind of calc/engineering problem you have not yet done. Your are awesome!

  • @patrickjmt
    @patrickjmt  16 років тому

    the point is: what if you have a more complicated function that you can not just solve for 'x' - what do you do then?! use newtons method! i kept my function simple to:
    1) illustrate the process
    2) keep things simple so that i can keep the video around 10 minutes!

  • @iamtheCarterP
    @iamtheCarterP 13 років тому

    You could also put in your initial x value then hit STO>X. So the initial value was 3, you hit 3 STO> X then u type the function in your calculator x - (x^7-1000)/(7x^6) then at the end of that function you do STO>X, so what will be in your calculator will be x- (x^7-1000)/(7x^6)STO>X. Every time you hit the = it will take that value and make it X. Just keep hitting = until your answer is within the error limit given.

  • @patrickjmt
    @patrickjmt  12 років тому

    finding roots / solutions to equations is hugely important in math.

  • @ElmoPansy
    @ElmoPansy 15 років тому

    I agree with the person who said you're better than a textbook. My own textbook was over $100 as well and confuses me to no end. Thank you for these videos.

  • @ImNotBlueBro
    @ImNotBlueBro 11 років тому

    I swear to god that you've taught me more than my own proffessors. Thank you so much for being my teacher essentially! Haha

  • @patrickjmt
    @patrickjmt  12 років тому +1

    awesome, glad i could help you out a bit :)

  • @SiriuslyAwesomeMusic
    @SiriuslyAwesomeMusic 12 років тому

    My Calc teacher is actually really good, but I'm only a sophomore in high school. I took two grades of math in the summers. So sometimes it's harder for me to grasp the concepts in AP Calc. Your videos do a really great job of reinforcing the concepts that I've learned in class. :)

  • @IFYOUWANTITGOGETIT
    @IFYOUWANTITGOGETIT 11 років тому +1

    Every new concept I learn in calculus blows my mind thinking about how mathematicians created it.

  • @alijaber3861
    @alijaber3861 Рік тому +1

    thank you still the same stuff being teached in 2023

  • @Vertigo311922
    @Vertigo311922 12 років тому

    Solid video man, wish me luck on my exam tomorrow!

  • @TheNumber2Pencil546
    @TheNumber2Pencil546 13 років тому

    i have gone through SO MANY of your videos and "liked" just about every one. haha now all my suggestion videos for my youtube account are math tutorials

  • @YukonExpatriate
    @YukonExpatriate 14 років тому

    Thanks a lot for this video and others! I watched them all and they were a great study aid for my calculus exam earlier today!

  • @pacman2681
    @pacman2681 11 років тому

    You're the best teacher in the world ... Srsly

  • @TheLivirus
    @TheLivirus 14 років тому

    Nice, practical and clear teaching.

  • @anwarowerZ
    @anwarowerZ 11 років тому

    That is just amazing.. Brilliant explanation, awesome illustration and a very neat handwriting :)

  • @dawnlightening
    @dawnlightening 4 роки тому

    Excellent video Patrick! Your video is a light unto this world, filled with the darkness caused by bad maths teachers. The geometrical insight which you give, beautifully explains the logic behind Newton's method. Of all subjects, Mathematics is populated by the worst teachers (mainly because they themselves learnt by rote). Your video is a very refreshing exception to this sad reality.

  • @alexkaalim392
    @alexkaalim392 7 років тому +7

    actually so much easier to understand than my 2 hr lecture

  • @InstantRam3n
    @InstantRam3n 13 років тому

    thank you so much man! i have a calc exam tomorrow and you saved me! :D

  • @cr4zyftw
    @cr4zyftw 12 років тому

    does it really matter what value you choose as your guess? will it make the process longer?

  • @therealalphageek
    @therealalphageek 11 років тому

    I LOVE YOU PATRICK!!!!!!!YOU SAVED ME 3 hours of insanity lol.

  • @holyshit922
    @holyshit922 Рік тому

    What about:
    1. Version for systems of nonlinear equations
    2. Picking good initial guess
    3. Cases when Newton's method does not converge
    4. Possible modifications to guarantee convergence

  • @jerseyboym5
    @jerseyboym5 5 років тому +7

    Thank you so much this helped me a ton. Math is not my thing but it has to be now that I'm an ChemE major fml haha

    • @navjotsingh2251
      @navjotsingh2251 5 років тому +3

      Honestly math is one of those things you have to keep on doing till you can do it with your eyes closed. Just keep on grinding and practicing then you'll do well :)

  • @patrickjmt
    @patrickjmt  14 років тому

    @hellosoul22 degree two polynomial - use the discriminant

  • @JohnsonMG_
    @JohnsonMG_ 12 років тому

    its just what it simplifies too. Try deriving it. if y=mx + b then f(x1)+f '(x1)(x1) + b. Therefore b = f(x1)-f '(x1(x1). to find the x interceot set y equal to zero you have m which is f '(x1) and b, solve for x2 :)

  • @YimYamesPlease
    @YimYamesPlease 12 років тому

    If it weren't for your UA-cam tutorials and Wolfram Alpha, I'd have failed college calc without doubt. Thanks man.

  • @hodongshin
    @hodongshin 9 років тому

    for the first example, where did you get the 3 for the first x? thank you for the answer :)

  • @patrickjmt
    @patrickjmt  16 років тому

    no problem

  • @sikel1
    @sikel1 13 років тому

    @fungsit In the simple case of this example an explicit solution for x when f(x) = 0 is easy, x = 1000^1/7. However, in practise you would never use this method for this type of problem. Other problems where an explicit solution is not available or where it is too computationally intensive to calculate, e.g. a large dimensional vector space problem, it is very useful. We can use Newton's method to give us a 'good' estimate of the solution in just a small number of iterations.

  • @nohyaya
    @nohyaya 15 років тому

    Thank you so much!
    But still can't understand what Newton's Method is good for if you can equal f(x) to zero and find the intersect x
    Any explanation, please?

  • @xkittyxxcatxx
    @xkittyxxcatxx 14 років тому

    Wow... it seems so much simpler here! Thanks so much for explaining!!
    But is it possible to do this without a calculator? Because my teacher's always telling us about not using calculators for problems... if we are tested on it it will have to be with calculators right??

  • @superlyobsessed
    @superlyobsessed 11 років тому

    Way easier to understand now! Thanks!

  • @mastersasori01
    @mastersasori01 14 років тому

    do you also have tutorials for fixed-point iteration method?

  • @freemovies4638
    @freemovies4638 5 років тому

    Can we use 1 for n or do we have to use 3? How do you approximate the number?

  • @wernis17
    @wernis17 13 років тому

    Thanks for this video, I have found that with my calc, I work out x1. And then I replace all the xn with "ANS" and then after that I just keep pressing "=" and it spits out all the answers. Brilliant Video, Writing a test tomorrow! This will save me!

  • @TommyFielding
    @TommyFielding 11 років тому

    much better than my analytical techniques lecturer!

  • @XxsmritixX
    @XxsmritixX 12 років тому

    Thank you you are like my 2nd calculus tutor, my calculus teacher does not teach well

  • @karm2master
    @karm2master 12 років тому

    thanks dude.. helps me a lot in my final exam..

  • @patrickjmt
    @patrickjmt  16 років тому

    of course... but can not one do just about all of math now with a calculator?

  • @stephanimok1424
    @stephanimok1424 11 років тому

    Great video - much easier to understand than my lecture notes! Thanks so much!

  • @ashleytho
    @ashleytho 7 років тому

    "Did you Know?: This method is actually named after 'Fig Newtons' cause it is so sweet!
    Take that Sir Isaac!"

  • @haileyparrett5883
    @haileyparrett5883 9 років тому

    is the point where it intersects the x value where when u cslculate it it gives the same result as before??

  • @pearcea1000
    @pearcea1000 14 років тому

    Thanks for these videos!! Helps so much!

  • @patrickjmt
    @patrickjmt  16 років тому

    thanks!

  • @Pesoxi
    @Pesoxi 7 років тому +2

    I've an exam of this subject next week and can I ask how do you knew to put x=3 in the first place to begin with. Everything else is made really simple and got hang of it.

    • @Pesoxi
      @Pesoxi 7 років тому

      Edit: So 3 gives positive solution but how do you find that out? You just try several numbers and test how they act?

    • @rawritshien
      @rawritshien 7 років тому +1

      You pick a starting value that you think is near the root. It's an approximation/guess.

    • @Pesoxi
      @Pesoxi 7 років тому

      rawritshien Thanks!

    • @JimmyThePhysicist
      @JimmyThePhysicist 7 років тому +1

      it is an initial guess he put 3 because 3 is close to the root.

    • @Pesoxi
      @Pesoxi 7 років тому

      Hypixel King Thanks!

  • @whyalwaysneedthis
    @whyalwaysneedthis 13 років тому

    how do you know the root must be between 2 and 3 at the first time? I dun really know which no i should pick for x1?

  • @patrickjmt
    @patrickjmt  12 років тому

    good luck!

  • @ShadesOfMisery
    @ShadesOfMisery 11 років тому

    For the function in the video, setting f(x) = 0 might be easier (although unlikely, especially doing it with a simple calculator and pen and paper, it's not easy to find the roots of that function); but if you're dealing with more complex functions you might run into some problems just setting f(x) =0... there's a reason this method exists, even though it may be obsolete in certain ways.

  • @jeuxpclol1011
    @jeuxpclol1011 9 років тому

    OMG thank you! The first min was already enough ^^

    • @alex-nv8rk
      @alex-nv8rk 9 років тому

      Same here! I was reading the the book for like 15 mins, couldn't understand what the hell it said there. His video did help!!

  • @TonyNguyen-it7vd
    @TonyNguyen-it7vd 11 років тому

    Can you please make a video for newton's laws of cooling?

  • @xenophyr
    @xenophyr 13 років тому

    hey mr patrickJMT! is this the same as fixed point iteration?

  • @nafoonthebaboon
    @nafoonthebaboon 11 років тому

    wow that was a lot easier than i thought it would be. Thanks man!

  • @edgarb.6187
    @edgarb.6187 6 років тому

    Can you use this to find y intercepts or to find any other intercepts at x = n or y = n?

  • @darkfey95
    @darkfey95 12 років тому

    You are a math god and I owe you my sanity

  • @Ncik1e5
    @Ncik1e5 11 років тому

    You should look at the function and workout a general idea where the two roots should (The easiest way to do this is to look at the graph). Then use Newton's Method twice, once with an original x value close to one 0, and another with an original x value close to the other.

  • @mgriswo5
    @mgriswo5 12 років тому

    Would you have gotten the same answer if you plugged in 2 instead of 3?

  • @23Foxford
    @23Foxford 11 років тому

    Hi i was wondering how can u find two positive roots using this method? I have an exercise to do which requires that

  • @thesage1096
    @thesage1096 9 років тому +8

    also referred to as newton-raphson method ?

    • @1yoan3
      @1yoan3 7 років тому +6

      YES (answering so future viewers can know).

  • @salao000
    @salao000 14 років тому

    thanks man. I hope a lot of good things hapen to you

  • @spgale
    @spgale 13 років тому

    FINALLY I GET THIS. THANK YOU. probably still going to fail tomorrow, but at least i know something

  • @MoistKing
    @MoistKing 12 років тому

    Great video. Simple to understand.

  • @sreynolds2
    @sreynolds2 16 років тому

    Please could you make more linear videos: orthogonolisation, Cauchy-Schwarz, Gram-Schmidt, eigenvectors etc. thanks

  • @11stargirl
    @11stargirl 10 років тому

    Can I plug in any number that is greater than or less than the x intercepts into the equation?

    • @aaronh9203
      @aaronh9203 9 років тому

      +Fatima Torres Not necessarily. You want to try to pick a number relatively close because newtons method may not work for example here if you picked -3 or something way off, because the slope would be almost vertical or completely vertical and thus you would not get anywhere

  • @bhoxzivanlangnamanpfhoe7869
    @bhoxzivanlangnamanpfhoe7869 3 роки тому

    So newtons method is a repitition of linear approximation?