How US Navy Drops MASSIVE Aircraft Carrier Anchor at Full Speed

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 27 лип 2022
  • Welcome back to the FLUCTUS channel for a discussion about anchors dropped and hoisted from Aircraft Carriers and what it takes to keep them at optimum functionality.
    Fluctus is a website and UA-cam channel dedicated to sea geeks. Whenever you are curious or an incorrigible lover of this mysterious world, our videos are made for you !
    We publish 3 videos a week on our UA-cam channel and many more articles on our website.
    Feel free to subscribe to not miss any of our updates and visit our website to discover additional content.
    Don’t forget to follow us on twitter:
    / fluctusofficial
    Please keep the comments section respectful. Any spam, insults or troll will be deleted.
    To contact us, make sure to use our email in the about section of this channel.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 2 тис.

  • @jimbonacum8917
    @jimbonacum8917 Рік тому +2616

    Just in case the casual viewer is not aware of this, the flight deck of an aircraft carrier is one of the most dangerous places in the world. For example the arresting cable can break and if you are not in a safe location it can cut you in half when it snaps back. The flight deck crew are highly trained and deserve tremendous respect. We tend to think of the pilots as heros and I am not saying they aren't. But the flight deck crew are remarkable men and women too.

    • @serpico1616
      @serpico1616 Рік тому +57

      MAYBE top 3000 most dangerous.

    • @I_Crit_My_Pants
      @I_Crit_My_Pants Рік тому +76

      @@serpico1616 Don't be stupid.

    • @serpico1616
      @serpico1616 Рік тому +34

      @@I_Crit_My_Pants Lol im not the one who said it was top most dangerous kiddo....

    • @dougewald243
      @dougewald243 Рік тому +36

      Thanks - I agree - having flight deck experience. During ops - especially night flight ops I can't think of any more dangerous patch of earth. Intense is far too mild to describe it & incredibly so when you are the new guy out there. It's such a blast to be yelled at by the flight ops officer from the bridge for all to hear over the flight deck loudspeakers. I was in the wrong place at the wrong time but not for long.

    • @dougewald243
      @dougewald243 Рік тому +24

      We were shown a training film of an incident on a carrier were a guy was hit in the legs by a snapped arresting cable whipping across the deck. This was in the days before crews were required to stay well away from extreme danger zones. In the film there were several other guys near the one that got hit. He wasn't doing something unusual. Obviously the arresting cable area (there are 4 at the rear of the deck) should be avoided during aircraft recovery operations. But the Navy didn't require it at the time of the incident. Why? The Navy did a lot of stupid stuff. If I remember correctly I believe we were told his legs were cut off at the knees. It sure flipped him over.
      Talk about reality TV.
      Then there's the training footage of the Forrestal fire. Simply horrific.

  • @robertfolkner9253
    @robertfolkner9253 Рік тому +139

    I served on two aircraft carriers. Whenever the anchors were deployed or retrieved, NO ONE was allowed to be in the windlass room! The links weighed 350 lbs. each and were each composed of three pieces. Imagine the results if one of them broke under tension and people were in the room!

    • @jamessones4044
      @jamessones4044 10 місяців тому +1

      Hi.
      What is the protocol when if/when the anchor is lost?
      Would it be salvaged if shallow or not at all?
      The sound of that much steal smashing around must be breathtaking

    • @Costumekiller
      @Costumekiller 10 місяців тому

      No way it only weighs 350 per link not even close

    • @TheBamaChad-W4CHD
      @TheBamaChad-W4CHD 10 місяців тому +4

      @Costumekiller ⁠check out the specs for various types of aircraft carriers used over the years in various navies. You will discover that there are in fact links that weigh 350 pounds. Some even weighed less and many much more.

    • @svenjansen2134
      @svenjansen2134 10 місяців тому +2

      Your 69th like was mine.

    • @Loki_Dokie
      @Loki_Dokie 8 місяців тому +3

      ​@@TheBamaChad-W4CHDnot sure why people wouldn't believe that, all they need to do is realize how big the ship is

  • @keywacat
    @keywacat Рік тому +34

    'Typically made of heavy metal' [calm dentist office music continues]

    • @Mediocre_JT
      @Mediocre_JT Рік тому +1

      Yeah, I was hoping for at least a guitar solo when the anchor was dropping.

    • @davepowell7168
      @davepowell7168 Рік тому

      Special drums known as wildcats 🎉

  • @bluegizmo1983
    @bluegizmo1983 10 місяців тому +83

    The anchor itself on large ships provides very little to none of the actual holding power when it's lowered into the water. The weight of the anchor is really just there to help pull out the chain. The weight of the chain itself stretched out along the sea floor is what actually holds the ship.

    • @johnhuldt
      @johnhuldt 7 місяців тому +2

      Casual Navigation did a whole video on this very topic as well :)

    • @dimitristripakis7364
      @dimitristripakis7364 6 місяців тому +1

      This is why even smaller boats have some chain to the anchor and then the rope. If you tie the anchor with a rope (without a chain) it will tense repeatedly and break something. The chain provides a smooth bouncing.

    • @CaptainRockoBD
      @CaptainRockoBD 4 місяці тому

      Duh

    • @CaptainRockoBD
      @CaptainRockoBD 4 місяці тому

      @@dimitristripakis7364incorrect. Anchor isn’t used to stop, it’s used to keep a stopped ship from moving. There shouldn’t be that much stress on the anchor to begin with.

  • @brukujinbrokujin7802
    @brukujinbrokujin7802 Рік тому +344

    Fun fact. The one holding the ship is not actually the anchor, but the weight of the chain multiplied by the distance from center of chain to ship. This is why ships can stop even if they are above mud seabed where anchor wont clog into anything

    • @Gigachad-mc5qz
      @Gigachad-mc5qz Рік тому +7

      How does that work? Youd need something to hold on to? Or does the water itself provide enough friction?

    • @prabalkahlon6910
      @prabalkahlon6910 Рік тому +3

      Details?

    • @watetwolf54
      @watetwolf54 Рік тому +27

      If I understand correctly, anchor is just a guide-pinpoint for the chain to follow. The chain itself is actually the thing that stops the ship (to be more specific, the friction between chain and the seafloor).
      So the more of chain is unfolded - the more of it is touching the floor - therefore more friction - more stoping power.
      *According to the information that I remember, be welcome to correct me if I'm wrong.

    • @endymion2001
      @endymion2001 Рік тому +8

      @@Gigachad-mc5qz It’s just the weight of the chain, not so much the friction.

    • @zefir813
      @zefir813 Рік тому +14

      @@endymion2001 but the chain weight doesn't change when deployed, it's the same when inside the ship.

  • @LAGoodz
    @LAGoodz Рік тому +27

    From a different perspective ships anchors are the bane of my life working as a global communications engineer. They regularly drag across submarine floor breaking fibre cables, disrupting Communications and Internet across the world and can sometimes take weeks to fix using specialist cable repair ships.

    • @waterboy8999
      @waterboy8999 10 місяців тому

      That's why wee have charts, and I'm only a leisure sailor.

    • @LAGoodz
      @LAGoodz 10 місяців тому +1

      @@waterboy8999 Well they need to read them. In recent years my company’s off-shore data centres in Jersey, Guernsey were cut off. The FLAG Europe-UAE & Asia cables in the Med were severed. This is just a few caused by shipping.

    • @waterboy8999
      @waterboy8999 10 місяців тому

      @@LAGoodz yes, and the captain of a certain cruise ship in the Med a few years ago....

    • @DanBeech-ht7sw
      @DanBeech-ht7sw 8 місяців тому

      Obviously that is not satisfactory, but it is completely predictable, and is the flaw in the concept of the submarine cable

  • @oicfas4523
    @oicfas4523 Рік тому +319

    I can't even imagine how you can stop such a heavy chain moving so fast downward with so much inertia in so little time. Amazing.

    • @patrickkenney2259
      @patrickkenney2259 Рік тому +12

      Same concept that stops automobiles.
      Friction exerted with immense pressure = stopping.

    • @oicfas4523
      @oicfas4523 Рік тому +31

      @@patrickkenney2259 I realized there must be a braking device. I was just marveling at how it can work so well. I think the heat generated during braking must be immense.

    • @ws8061
      @ws8061 Рік тому +7

      Big hydraulic pumps and asbestos brakes, there's actually a good bit of equipment just one deck down from the wildcats. It is wild though, everything on a Carrier is just so massive. Each link is roughly 300 lbs, anchors 32 tons a piece.

    • @thismybid
      @thismybid Рік тому

      Earth dont spin genius simple

    • @redrob6026
      @redrob6026 Рік тому +3

      Just grab it

  • @patrickdoyle9369
    @patrickdoyle9369 Рік тому +71

    We don't talk about large weights in pounds... ONLY TONNES ..

    • @sirclemeni1
      @sirclemeni1 Рік тому +2

      only freedom units can describe the anchor of a freedom bringer

    • @allnamesaretakenb4
      @allnamesaretakenb4 Рік тому +3

      Cause freedom aint needs accuracy

    • @jjkill3847
      @jjkill3847 Рік тому

      Like ya girlfriend

    • @Glace077
      @Glace077 Рік тому

      Common America W

    • @edtracy650
      @edtracy650 Рік тому +2

      Aircraft Carrier anchors are not just 30000 pounds. They are 30 Tons. 60000 pounds.

  • @music4ever1981
    @music4ever1981 Рік тому +711

    This video was really interesting and informative! Speaking from my perspective as a US Navy submarine veteran, the bottom of the anchor on a submarine is designed in such a way that when the anchor is stored, the bottom of it conforms to the vessel's round bottom. There's holes in the bottom of the submarine that are specifically designed for the anchor's flukes, and the chain is stored in a bin in one of the main ballast tanks. When the anchor is stored in place, if you were to look at the bottom of the submarine when it's in drydock, unless you knew what you were looking for, it would be difficult to spot the anchor.

    • @williamtsmith9668
      @williamtsmith9668 Рік тому +23

      Thank YOU much for your service. 👻🗽💯

    • @music4ever1981
      @music4ever1981 Рік тому +9

      @@williamtsmith9668 Thank you for the compliment! I appreciate your support! 🇺🇲 Did you serve?

    • @jasonrjohnston
      @jasonrjohnston Рік тому +48

      It never even occured to me that submarines have anchors. Of course they do. 🤯

    • @coloradostrong
      @coloradostrong Рік тому +5

      @@williamtsmith9668 What "service"?

    • @music4ever1981
      @music4ever1981 Рік тому +26

      @@coloradostrong I was in the US Navy for 9 years, all active duty. I spent 5 years on a submarine, which resulted in 8 patrols. I served from Aug 2001 to Dec 2010.

  • @rhodalphssanitorium5010
    @rhodalphssanitorium5010 Рік тому +17

    I was in the US Navy. Thought I missed it the first time through, so I had to watch this a second time. The smart sounding lady did not answer the reason I clicked the video. I still don't know how an aircraft carrier drops it's anchor at full speed. That would have been something to see. Thanks anyhow. Love watching big ships in action.

    • @PoppiB
      @PoppiB Рік тому

      @@jonfrost2152 Understand, the anchor and chain don't have to hit the bottom to offer enough DRAG in the water to help a ship turn or stop.

    • @robertquast9684
      @robertquast9684 Рік тому +2

      I think they were referring to letting it free fall without restriction

    • @SaintSaint
      @SaintSaint Рік тому

      @@robertquast9684 Yeah. I was also kind of hoping they were referring to the ship's speed and not the speed at which the anchor dropped. I was just too embarrassed to say something.

  • @SurpriseMurder
    @SurpriseMurder Рік тому +2

    at the end of each use, seamen give the chain a slap and utter: "this baby ain't going nowhere."

  • @harryschaefer8563
    @harryschaefer8563 Рік тому +342

    The room with the windlass is called the forecastle. My Marine son told me that the forecastle is a special part of the ship where promotions are sometimes awarded. I got to go on a "Tiger Cruise" with my son aboard the USS America. It was a major highlight of my 74 years.

    • @johnlucier5654
      @johnlucier5654 Рік тому +16

      Everyone refers to it as fo'c'sle.

    • @brian.7966
      @brian.7966 Рік тому +5

      yes, it's where you get the Golden rivit...

    • @tombiby5892
      @tombiby5892 Рік тому +12

      @@johnlucier5654 Good call. Sailors don't have time to enunciate long words when a hurricane's a-brewin'

    • @johnlucier5654
      @johnlucier5654 Рік тому +11

      On the Coral Sea (CV-43) they had a weight room right under the focsle, of course it was tiny and consisted of one full station universal machine, you know the ones with stacks you put the pins in. Because the focsle is way up front at the bow, its movements up and down with the waves are more pronounced than anywhere else on the ship, making workouts very interesting. That 180 lb bench press goes to 300lbs then back below 100 during each rep.
      We went thru hurricane Ewa off the coast of hawaii I think it was 81, that was interesting to say the least.

    • @lopan1698
      @lopan1698 Рік тому +8

      Whenever someone says there's a "special place where promotions are awarded" in the service, my imagination defaults to thinking it's for violently explosive high-turnover job openings providing so much upward mobility.
      I'm Artillery and we shared living & working space with EOD & Ordnance guys. One sympathizes.

  • @barryharris4
    @barryharris4 Рік тому +697

    Having built US Navy ships my entire life, it’s quite exciting for the brake band on the winless to catch on fire during free fall operation. This is due to hydraulic oil leaks in the system. An unavoidable consequence on the older anchor systems. I’ve been doing this 30 something years.

    • @andypage9
      @andypage9 Рік тому +13

      windlass not winless

    • @johnlucier5654
      @johnlucier5654 Рік тому +38

      @@andypage9 they musta spelled it different 30 something years ago.

    • @philh.7100
      @philh.7100 Рік тому +3

      Couldn’t they upgrade the hydraulic system to repair the oil leaks

    • @HighlanderNorth1
      @HighlanderNorth1 Рік тому +6

      @@andypage9
      ❓ So, do you expect the NY Jets to do so poorly that they end up with a windlass record?😁
      Btw folks, that's the Russian protected cruiser Aurora at 0:31. It was launched in 1900 and commissioned in 1903. It's super cool that they saved and restored that old cruiser, because there are only about 2 or maybe 3 protected cruisers left in the world. MANY of them were cutting edge when ordered, but became obsolete just a few years later, after they were completed and entered service!
      During the post WW1 and WW2 period, these obsolete cruisers were quickly scrapped and their steel recycled into newer ships. The only other existing protected cruiser that I can think of is the USS Olympia in Philadelphia.

    • @HighlanderNorth1
      @HighlanderNorth1 Рік тому +27

      @@philh.7100
      When I worked on carriers, we didn't have to bother with "hydraulics" to slow the anchors. As the anchor was being dropped, I just wrapped my arms around the anchor chain and applied pressure to it, which dramatically slowed it's descent. Sure, it caused some skin abrasions, and I ruined a lot of uniform shirts, but the navy happily paid for 25 new shirts a month..... 😉

  • @BeckVMH
    @BeckVMH Рік тому +368

    The hazards of this work looks incredible and pretty daunting from an outsiders perspective. Kudos and appreciation to all involved.

    • @BeckVMH
      @BeckVMH Рік тому +8

      @Duffelbag Drag Haha valid point.

    • @RCAvhstape
      @RCAvhstape Рік тому

      @Duffelbag Drag Until you get hit by an antiship missile barrage and lose 3000 guys in one bad afternoon.

    • @dougewald243
      @dougewald243 Рік тому +2

      Sailors who work with these anchors aren't called "swabbies" like other sailors or the other nicknames sailors enjoy. The special name reserved just for them is "limpy" for obvious reasons. Or if you really like the guy/girl you can use the very affectionate 'gimpy" if the mood strikes.

    • @dougewald243
      @dougewald243 Рік тому

      @Duffelbag Drag Typical interserice rivalry that often results in people not being just disgruntled but wounded or dead.
      It's sad that you actually believe the Navy is less dangerous than the army. You have obviously never set foot aboard a ship during ops.
      It's the dumb ones who volunteer to be shoot at in the desert by even dumber people.
      I'm ex Navy and Army so you can keep your comeback to yourself.

    • @dougewald243
      @dougewald243 Рік тому +1

      @@BeckVMH, nowhere close to "valid." Have you served in the Navy? No branch is any less dangerous than any other.

  • @johnb3289
    @johnb3289 Рік тому +68

    Great video. Technical point. The purpose of the anchor is to hold the chain on the bottom. When a ship pays out its anchor chain, the bulk of the chain is on the bottom, and a small part angles upwards through the hawsepipe and onto the forecastle and is "clipped" in place by the pelican hook that is connected to a strong padeye on the deck. That curve is called "catenary" and serves as a "spring" to absorb the strain wind and seas would exert on the ship, as more chain is lifted off the bottom. When the seas calm, that chain that was lifted off the bottom eases back onto the seabed. The anchor plays a critical part, but it is the accumulated friction of the chain on the bottom combined with the anchor that holds the ship at its anchorage.

    • @keamu8580
      @keamu8580 Рік тому +10

      Yes! The anchor hook itself would not be enough to keep the ship from straying. It's also friction, and the enormous weight of the chain (which increases due to classical mechanics as the chain is pulled horizontal) that reaches an equilibrium with the ocean forces and holds the ship in place. When pulled horizontal, the chain effectively weighs so much that even the mass of the ship cannot overcome it.

    • @TheDaniel688
      @TheDaniel688 Рік тому +5

      Thank you, I was waiting for the video to explain that the weight of the chain plays a significant part in anchoring a ship, not just the strength of the chain, but the video missed this important detail.

    • @baldskits
      @baldskits Рік тому

      I thought the catenary results in a straight pull on the anchor. Since the flukes can swivel, this results in digging the anchor deeper, the harder the strain.

    • @neilthomson168
      @neilthomson168 Рік тому +9

      The weight of the sea on the chain on the ocean floor together with the shallow angle of the chain to the ship provides the resistance or strength to the anchor system … in other words a 30 ton anchor and chain system hanging just perpendicular would not provide the strength to secure the force of an aircraft carrier being moved by the seas. In stormy seas, the ratio is 7 to 1, meaning for every foot of depth at anchor, 7 feet of chain needs to be lying on the ocean floor … hence why the chain is over 1,000 feet long.

    • @steiny3353
      @steiny3353 Рік тому +1

      John B ..Well THAT is very interesting, John. I didn't know that, but when you explain it like that , it all makes sense. Thank you.

  • @stevensaid2200
    @stevensaid2200 10 місяців тому +7

    Another interesting fact about why arresting gear is needed is because the planes have to land at full power to ensure that if anything goes wrong the plane will have enough speed to take off again on the other end of the ship.
    Also I’ve seen video of an arresting gear cable snapping and taking some of the flight deck personnel’s legs off. A flight deck is by far one of the most dangerous places to work.

  • @chrislewis7238
    @chrislewis7238 Рік тому +173

    It's not the anchor that holds the ship, it's the weight of the chain on the sea floor that does. The anchor is there to keep the chain in place.

    • @GirishVenkatachalam
      @GirishVenkatachalam Рік тому +1

      Thanks

    • @wallacegrommet9343
      @wallacegrommet9343 Рік тому +12

      You have it backwards. Chain is used instead of rope or wire because it resists abrasion and is easier to be lifted by a windlass, which grips each link securely.

    • @chrislewis7238
      @chrislewis7238 Рік тому +34

      @@wallacegrommet9343 That was the explanation that was given in Seamen school so I'm gonna continue to go with that one and if you can find me a rope or wire that can pull a 30,000 pound anchor through the Hawsepipe across the deck around the windlass and down into the Anchor chain room and come back up without turning into a big knot I'd like to buy stock in that company

    • @MrSkullWolf
      @MrSkullWolf Рік тому +10

      @@chrislewis7238 lol 😂 exactly navy taught us the right way lol

    • @flick22601
      @flick22601 Рік тому +4

      I was just getting ready to make the same comment as you did Chris.

  • @luxuryhub1323
    @luxuryhub1323 Рік тому +113

    i was aboard the USS America on a "Tiger Cruise" with my Marine Son. I was allowed to wander all over the ship at will, and I returned to the forecastle many times because of ceremonial significance of the forecastle. My son explained that often, promotion ceremonies are held there. For the rest of my life I will be grateful to the Navy for giving me the opportunity to live life aboard an aircraft carrier with my son. The food was damn good too! Happy to see that Navy beat Army today!!

    • @yyxy.oncesaid
      @yyxy.oncesaid Рік тому +1

      Navy beat Army at what please sir.We can read Ur mind unfortunately

    • @blakeh6250
      @blakeh6250 Рік тому +10

      @@yyxy.oncesaid its a famous football rivalry for over 100 years.

    • @blakeh6250
      @blakeh6250 Рік тому +4

      Did a few of those on destroyers..we got to show off shooting the big guns.

    • @podunkcitizen2562
      @podunkcitizen2562 Рік тому +2

      @@blakeh6250 Yes, and the game will be in Dec. 2022 so I don't get it.

    • @seanswader2124
      @seanswader2124 Рік тому

      @@yyxy.oncesaid wth

  • @user-vy3de8me9t
    @user-vy3de8me9t Рік тому +8

    Such a task can't be done without specialized engineering supervision and alert personnel teams,outstanding work 👍

  • @lizardskinard3485
    @lizardskinard3485 Рік тому +4

    Thanx for the memories. Spent 3 years onboard the USS Saratoga (CV60) in the 80's. Those were the days!!

    • @PoppiB
      @PoppiB Рік тому +1

      I left her in 84 Best of the 5 ships I served on.

  • @Bduh2
    @Bduh2 Рік тому +91

    I can't even come close to imagine the constant maintenance on an aircraft carrier but I envision the "simple" maintenance on my truck and multiply that by a million just to get close to imagine what needs to be done to keep the ship in tip-top condition and, I think, that's not even close because there are so many departments with their own maintenance.

    • @deirdre108
      @deirdre108 Рік тому +8

      @@busimagen You're right! My experience was that a 12 hour work day was a short day.

    • @timothyboone5003
      @timothyboone5003 Рік тому +1

      The comparison of working on your truck, would be more accurate if you drove it only in the beach every day.

    • @crazyredhare
      @crazyredhare Рік тому +6

      A simple sweep and dusting occurs every morning. Imagine five thousand close quartered persons shedding skin cells.

    • @WhittaII
      @WhittaII Рік тому +2

      Yeah fuck that it stresses me out looking after my machine at work let alone a whole fucking ship

    • @kubefs
      @kubefs Рік тому +1

      then add the 100 or so aircraft on it that also need constang maintenance

  • @axelfoley1768
    @axelfoley1768 Рік тому +6

    America,, what an amazing country. The engineering prowess & logistics acumen is mind-blowing

  • @catatonicbug7522
    @catatonicbug7522 Рік тому +24

    Just had my first experience with a ground-based arresting cable last week. The commercial plane I was on ran over the cable just before takeoff from the VPS (Valparaiso, FL) airport. The runway is shared by Eglin AFB.

    • @Hurst6969
      @Hurst6969 Рік тому

      It’s amazing watching an aircraft engage a barrier pendant. Navy vs AF engagements are very different!

    • @catatonicbug7522
      @catatonicbug7522 Рік тому +2

      @@Hurst6969 of course! For the AF, it's an emergency, but for the Navy, it's just a landing.

  • @noelht1
    @noelht1 Рік тому +1

    3:25 I like how my man is testing the anchor and representing his clique at the same time.

  • @justinkraynie6435
    @justinkraynie6435 Рік тому +9

    Amazing how this video about aircraft arresting systems briefly gave mention of an anchor and never explained "How US Navy Drops MASSIVE Aircraft Carrier Anchor at Full Speed".

    • @tampoponomonogatari
      @tampoponomonogatari Рік тому +1

      Yeah, this video kind of crapped out halfway through and turned into a documentary on land-based aircraft landing arrest systems. An interesting topic in its own right, I guess, but not a lot to do with aircraft carrier anchors. I was kind of bummed out.

  • @wichitarick
    @wichitarick Рік тому +8

    Cool, is rare or distorted a lot when viewing that many times! This gives a brief glimpse of how DANGEROUS handling that chain could be,it misses in the fact,that is just ONE :) I slept right under the 3 wire on 2 cruises & worked full ops for days on end but just being around the systems around the forecastle had me hugging the bulkhead :) Thanks to my curious bosses a Lt. and a master chief we got to see them install the main chains and anchors(systems) in dry dock on the U.S.S America & Indy Also saw them re-install the engines and propellers on the America, have always regretted not finding a way into the engine rooms during full ops :( Met the crew testing or "pinging" those links on the dock of the Indy it wasn't glamorous lol ,we were popular ,we had permission to drive a work van onto the dock so we could bring real food AND BEER :) true Navy way a squadron hat and some beer will get you access to many places :) Have done all manner of crazy dangerous jobs and that was the best for about a dollar and hr :) Side note I liked going in the forecastle on a cruise because it is CLEAN :) everywhere I lived and worked was soaked in j.p.5 :)Be safe and a heads up to anyone who has ever worked on one these boats :) Peace. Rick

    • @inconnu4961
      @inconnu4961 Рік тому +1

      I'm going to assume J.P.5 is the jet fuel?

    • @wichitarick
      @wichitarick Рік тому +1

      @@inconnu4961 Yes assume correctly, actually is no escaping it anywhere, Especially under jets all day or night,funny part is it washes off all the hydraulic oil & cuts through black layer of jet exhaust "film" that cover everything else :) If your lucky and work in a few shops you can wash off the jp,(it is diesel fuel so it has oil in it), in acetone or MeK :) Rick

    • @kirkkirkland7244
      @kirkkirkland7244 Рік тому

      Boats????? No SHIPS!!!!

  • @ianhadlock2405
    @ianhadlock2405 Рік тому +3

    Incredible respect to anyone serving in any branch of our military. Thanks

  • @shamirdaya
    @shamirdaya Рік тому +1

    I’m here, not because I’m interested, but because I’ve gone down the UA-cam rabbit hole.

  • @Sagittarius-A-Star
    @Sagittarius-A-Star Рік тому +127

    It's incredible how much effort has to be put into maintaining a seemingly unimportant part like an anchor chain.

    • @MervandtheMagicTones
      @MervandtheMagicTones Рік тому +8

      It probably cost half a million dollars. That's reason enough

    • @supertramp6011
      @supertramp6011 Рік тому +18

      And it is a very important part of any ship….

    • @alexayache8556
      @alexayache8556 Рік тому +22

      I guess brakes on a car aren't that important either ....

    • @megaluckydog1212
      @megaluckydog1212 Рік тому +5

      "If it moves salute it, if it doesn't move paint it." RN.

    • @Sagittarius-A-Star
      @Sagittarius-A-Star Рік тому +2

      @@capablemachine Right - I chose the wrong word but at least I put "seemingly" in front of it ;-)

  • @longbowshooter5291
    @longbowshooter5291 Рік тому +32

    Somehow I missed them dropping the anchor while going full speed?

    • @wudznutt6732
      @wudznutt6732 Рік тому +2

      Me too.

    • @mc911
      @mc911 Рік тому +2

      @@wudznutt6732 me three

    • @mytech6779
      @mytech6779 Рік тому +1

      I think they meant anchor in free fall, because the editors are idiots with poor grasp of the language.

    • @podulox
      @podulox Рік тому +1

      @@wudznutt6732
      Me foor.

    • @RCAvhstape
      @RCAvhstape Рік тому +3

      Yes, and halfway through the video it suddenly turned into a lecture about aircraft arresting gear systems for some reason.

  • @SDrtheone
    @SDrtheone Рік тому +10

    I’m very confused how we went from
    Anchors to stopping aircraft… I mean I can see the connections but…

  • @nothanks9503
    @nothanks9503 7 місяців тому

    6:33 you know the nerd who designed those blast shields felt special

  • @robertbishop5357
    @robertbishop5357 Рік тому +14

    What does arresting gear have to do with anchors?

    • @Jonathan.D
      @Jonathan.D Рік тому +1

      Is your comment satire?

    • @napiersliberty
      @napiersliberty Рік тому +1

      seriously? this has to be a joke

    • @hoosierdaddy4742
      @hoosierdaddy4742 Рік тому +4

      I race drag boats, so I'm not exactly an expert when it comes to anchors, but...I would have to imagine it has a WHOLE LOT to do with them being able to control it & slow it down to keep it from just free-reeling/running itself all the way out due to all the speed/weight/gravity/inertia involved once it starts hauling ass!

    • @jeremyhess7977
      @jeremyhess7977 Рік тому +1

      Nothing..... nothing at all. They're two entirely separate systems.

  • @StreamCrops
    @StreamCrops Рік тому +14

    11:44 The US Navy also enlists common arachnids to build emergency web systems which act as a final line of defense

  • @lifeofjelllo3596
    @lifeofjelllo3596 2 місяці тому

    former Aviation Machinists Mate from the navy here. i was on a deployment on the Eisenhower back in 2020, and it baffles me how something so massive could move so terrifyingly fast. keeping your head on a swivel transfers over to the civilian world too

  • @Stacy_Smith
    @Stacy_Smith Рік тому +9

    It's the weight of the chain that holds the ship in place NOT the anchor! The anchor just provides "grip" on the seabed to keep the chain from moving.

    • @jamesfloyd1864
      @jamesfloyd1864 Рік тому +1

      Correct! It's the weight of a long section of chain lying on the bottom that holds the vessel in place. Thank you for making that clear.

  • @sjp35productions6
    @sjp35productions6 Рік тому +6

    Fun facts about the BAK-12:
    It uses a B-52 brake to slow the aircraft catching the cable.
    There are 2 brake/engine combos, one on each side of the runway.
    The reason you saw a firefighter running the BAK-12 is because during an emergency, we can’t always get the CE crews out in time to reset the cable.
    We (base fire dept.) trained at least once per quarter on resetting the cable. It’s a lot of coordination between the two crews to pull the cable back in place.
    But wait! There’s more!
    There was a second arresting system that used webbing stretched across the runway called the BAK-11.
    That was for large frame aircraft to catch.
    What did this use to slow and stop aircraft?
    Anchor chain!

  • @nelsmohawk257
    @nelsmohawk257 Рік тому +10

    The purpose of the anchor is to pull out the chain, the chain is pulled out along the sea floor via the ship backing down and a swing arch (the point of anchor drop to a specified length: dependent on the depth of the anchor spot) is plotted. That's why the anchor drop spot is Not where the anchorage spot is designated. The weight of the chain on the sea floor is what holds the ship in place.

  • @deathtrapgonzo7141
    @deathtrapgonzo7141 Рік тому +29

    The system they start to show at 10:30 is actually called M31 MCEAGS (Marine Corps Expeditionary Arresting Gear System). It's a self contained mobile arresting gear system the Marine Corps can install pretty much anywhere.

    • @vp4822
      @vp4822 Рік тому +1

      Makes sense, and totally useful to have. E.g., in places with very short run-ways.

  • @kepler186f4
    @kepler186f4 Рік тому +36

    Excellent video about the anchor chains and arresting systems. I was a bit disappointed that there was no mention of the motors that retrieve the fifteen ton anchor chains.

    • @JohnThomas-ci9ml
      @JohnThomas-ci9ml Рік тому +1

      No mention either of the need to have the ship perfectly stationary vis à vis the sea floor otherwise the momentum of a moving ship of that size would just tear the hook off. Have been on board a supertanker on the bridge as the very fraught procedure was undertaken. As soon as the ship was stationary & the hook was dropped the relief of the crew was palpable.

    • @kepler186f4
      @kepler186f4 Рік тому +1

      @@JohnThomas-ci9ml The tremendous energies involved would be phenomenal. I suppose a ship of that tonnage would use thrusters instead of sea anchors for station keeping.

    • @JohnThomas-ci9ml
      @JohnThomas-ci9ml Рік тому +1

      @@kepler186f4 Sea anchors. They were definitely dropping the hook(s). I remember they had some sort of Doppler equipment to measure the motion of the ship against the sea floor. Maybe they had thrusters to help achieve optimum conditions. Very intense concentration from all concerned. The hook would have been torn off even at a slow crawling speed less than a knot. No ifs or buts. The ship had to be stationary.

    • @kepler186f4
      @kepler186f4 Рік тому +1

      @@JohnThomas-ci9ml What some without understanding would considered a simple task, others with knowledge would know how stressful a situation like that is.

    • @steveib724
      @steveib724 Рік тому

      @@JohnThomas-ci9ml gotta be moving to set an anchor ⚓️ that anchor ain't snapping

  • @taraswertelecki3786
    @taraswertelecki3786 Рік тому +17

    The anchor chain is not attached to the ship, it is held in in the chain locker by gravity. Only the catspans and drums that pull up or lower the chain connect it to the ship. The chain locker is a void, or space not intended for human occupation, and the chain just piles up in it. It is normally never entered by the crew.

    • @philmenzies2477
      @philmenzies2477 Рік тому

      BS

    • @joelang6126
      @joelang6126 10 місяців тому

      It's connected to the ship via the "The Bitter End"

    • @taraswertelecki3786
      @taraswertelecki3786 10 місяців тому

      That's the mooring lines.

    • @joelang6126
      @joelang6126 10 місяців тому

      @@taraswertelecki3786 Mooring ropes are not connected to anything. The anchor chain is secured to the vessels structure via the bitter end.
      The chain locker is inspected at least every year.
      I've been at sea 20 years as a deck officer, look it up.

    • @taraswertelecki3786
      @taraswertelecki3786 10 місяців тому

      @@joelang6126 Have you even been in the chain locker? I have been. Never did I see anything to which anchor chains were attached. The catspans on the decks though engage the chains like sprockets. However, some ships do not have anchor chains, they have a thick wire rope at the end of which the anchor is attached. The other end is connected to a windlass.

  • @forcetechno2190
    @forcetechno2190 Рік тому +1

    incredible when the officer dropped the anchor. how the anchor falls slowly into the water. a beauty

  • @brussels13207
    @brussels13207 Рік тому +3

    “Made of heavy metal” gosh I never would have guessed that!

  • @chicobicalho5621
    @chicobicalho5621 Рік тому +6

    It isn't only the anchor, "hooked" to the sea bed that keeps the ship from moving, but a great length of chain as well, who's weight, stretched along the bottom of the sea providing slack to stop the boat from drifting away.

    • @Max_Meier
      @Max_Meier Рік тому +1

      The anchor itself does nothing else than to give the chain a fixpoint, it isn't even theoretically capable of holding the ship in place.

  • @bikersoncall
    @bikersoncall Рік тому +4

    I was the captain of three of the Navy's largest battleships
    during WWII, at the same time, I personally attended all anchor
    droppings because I felt that it was my duty, being the most important
    part of a ship's operations, and being the most important man in the Navy,
    I say this because I read the first 10 comments, and you should thank me
    for my service, whether I served or not, because I can spell anchor and
    Navy, having watched others do it.

    • @podulox
      @podulox Рік тому

      No wonder you don't have time for Ads...

    • @romelegionmaker8625
      @romelegionmaker8625 Рік тому

      Wow, thats INCREDIBLE! What did you experience, MOST IMPORTANT MAN IN THE NAVY, while serving in the INTENSE PACIFIC THEATER! You are a god among men and my hero.

    • @bikersoncall
      @bikersoncall Рік тому

      @@podulox No wonder you can't cook, you're too busy with your mindless,
      and childish one liners.
      🤐🤪🤣🤣
      I'm sure we would all love to see what you
      have 'ever' written in in your life
      that was more than a sentence,
      and in the interest of
      improving our community here at youtube,
      or attempting to improve the human
      experience through writing about freedom,
      and the human condition,
      what makes it all work, and what impedes it.
      All ears bro...

    • @bikersoncall
      @bikersoncall Рік тому

      @@romelegionmaker8625 Gnats, Mosquitos, and horrible-food*, 😲 *which was
      easily corrected during my PTSD
      recovery; 🍕🍕 All kidding aside, I
      have great respect for the men that died
      and served in the military, under the
      assumption that they were fighting to
      preserve our freedom, which includes
      family members from the
      Civil War, WWI, WWII, Korea, and Iraq.

    • @JDs_RandomHandle
      @JDs_RandomHandle Рік тому +1

      Probably one of the funniest things I've read in a while.

  • @philipmontoya2078
    @philipmontoya2078 Рік тому +2

    Kudos and appreciation to all involved.

  • @ramdobe9276
    @ramdobe9276 Рік тому +1

    1:57 didn’t expect to see lil nas X there😂

  • @0mnom
    @0mnom Рік тому +8

    I’d love to witness that in person (from afar lol), I reckon it would be a massive thrill to see so much weight and power moving at that speed, I wonder if everyone on the ship feels it under the feet as it happens?
    Fascinating

    • @michaelfortier9907
      @michaelfortier9907 Рік тому +8

      I served on the USS Constellation, CV-64 in the 80’s. When they dropped an anchor, You felt it and heard it. I was 3 or 4 levels below it and astern a bit. It was a slightly distant mechanical banging-clanging at the start that you could not miss, there was no mistaking what you were hearing. Also had a resonating tone to it once it got moving. I played with an audio tone generator to find the frequency from memory. I thing it was about 550 Hz-the sound. Lasted about 4 to 5 seconds as I recall. I remember feeling several pulses of energy when an anchor was dropped also. I might be off a little, it’s been 35 years!

    • @sydneymomma11
      @sydneymomma11 Рік тому

      ​@@michaelfortier9907 Thank you for sharing this, I was able to experience it from just your words. cheers.

  • @mommymawmaw1852
    @mommymawmaw1852 Рік тому +8

    Love and respect to those who serve in all areas of these ships and in our military

    • @TheBenjammin
      @TheBenjammin Рік тому

      They do a great job killing civilians and spreading chaos and death throughout the world. What's next? You're going to thank God for us dropping atomic bombs on civilian targets in Japan?

  • @joshuakarr-BibleMan
    @joshuakarr-BibleMan Рік тому +2

    That anchor drop test at about 4:00 or so, made my skin crawl.
    I was a pit snipe, and I'm a machine repairman now, but seeing that chain tear through, knowing those links are like 250 lbs of steel each, just gave me a lot more respect for the deck apes.

  • @theferrones
    @theferrones Рік тому +6

    I served in the navy from 84-88. Ad3 on the forrestal. Don’t think I miss it really but the memories are real and some were pretty good. I’d recommend it to anyone to serve their country.

    • @elwin38
      @elwin38 Рік тому

      I served in the Navy from 86-89. ABHAN on the Belleau Wood.

  • @jamesrichardthompson
    @jamesrichardthompson Рік тому +15

    Not "wind-lass" it is pronounced "WIND less".

    • @frednutz1604
      @frednutz1604 Рік тому +2

      You might want to look up the definition of "windlass" James.

    • @5DNRG
      @5DNRG Рік тому

      ...and forecastle is pronounced foksil....

  • @DetroitMicroSound
    @DetroitMicroSound Рік тому +6

    "Is [this chain’s] pattern strange to you? Or would you know the weight and length of the strong coil you bear yourself? It was as heavy and as long as this seven Christmas Eves ago. You have labored in it since. It is a ponderous chain” -Jacob Marley.

  • @sitbone3
    @sitbone3 Рік тому +2

    It’s actually not the anchor the holds the ship in place; it’s the weight of the length of chain extended on the sea floor that does the job.

  • @miranda.cooper
    @miranda.cooper Рік тому

    The music in the background on an aircraft carrier: "The hills are alive with the sound of brrrrrrrrt"

  • @echospaw899
    @echospaw899 Рік тому +4

    Very interesting... most people have no idea how much work goes into these projects and functions.

    • @alexsnyder6352
      @alexsnyder6352 Рік тому

      So much financing for life worthy experience like this.

  • @lawrence5039
    @lawrence5039 Рік тому +22

    Each chain weighs 246,000 pounds for a 60,000 pound anchor. There are 2 of these. They are what actually holds the ship in place while at 'anchor'.

    • @robertsantos2362
      @robertsantos2362 Рік тому +4

      No, the weight of the chain on the bottom holds the ship in place. The anchor just holds the chain in place.

    • @nowherepeople3431
      @nowherepeople3431 Рік тому +19

      @@robertsantos2362 That’s literally what he said dude.

    • @HarryKuloh
      @HarryKuloh Рік тому +3

      @@robertsantos2362 that's literally what the guy said...

    • @culdeus9559
      @culdeus9559 Рік тому +1

      What's one link weigh?

  • @BrokenMedic
    @BrokenMedic 6 місяців тому +1

    Those anchor rooms look amazingly clean and decorated. I was in the army and we took pride in certain areas and decorated them similar. Can anyone in the navy confirm ? Also these areas were only open to certain people of an MOS.

  • @goosecubes
    @goosecubes Рік тому +2

    This was fun and nostalgic to watch. I was on the USS Theodore Roosevelt cvn-71. I operated and lead catapults 3 and 4 at various times of my sea-duty. I later went to shore-duty in PAX River MD, where I also got to operate in the test catapult and arresting gear. The gear engine and damper systems are very similar to what is on board the ship. I'm no stranger to maintaining large and heavy equipment and seeing those sailors working on the anchor systems; that's hard work for sure. Even the airman have hard work running drills/operations and maintaining those air-force variants of the arresting system. Thank you.

    • @prestonbaldwin796
      @prestonbaldwin796 10 місяців тому

      Thank you for your service. Pax ain’t to far from me. As a civilian I have done construction work there multiple times. I’m from Calvert

  • @thepotato405
    @thepotato405 Рік тому +11

    If you guys want your very own warship anchor go look in the anchorages outside Annapolis. When I was in the navy we were told basically that you're 100% going to loose your anchor because of the soil down at the bottom. There's probably hundreds.

  • @pmichael73
    @pmichael73 Рік тому +86

    My departure from a US carrier was delayed when the anchor got away from the crew and anchor and all the chain went to the bottom (The end of the chain is not connected to anything.) Each link in my carrier's anchor chain was 360 pounds and each anchor weighed 30 tons. It always amazed me that the chains were pulled taut on the forecastle.

    • @hcolt360
      @hcolt360 Рік тому +5

      Why don’t they connect the end of the chain to anything?

    • @drfiberglass
      @drfiberglass Рік тому +13

      Had the same problem while in the Coast Guard. It took all day dredging for the chain before snagging onto it.

    • @lelandgaunt9985
      @lelandgaunt9985 Рік тому +32

      @@hcolt360
      It is for emergency reasons, in case the ship needs to dump it. Or if the anchor is caught on something at the bottom it can be ditched as well.

    • @pmichael73
      @pmichael73 Рік тому +36

      @@hcolt360 The weight of the anchor and chain could tear out several bulkheads and damage machinery, electrical systems, water supplies, etc.

    • @PhilSmith71
      @PhilSmith71 Рік тому +3

      Forgive my landlubber ignorance…. If the anchor chain is not connected to anything, how does the crew stop the chain from getting away(?) from them and conversely, how is the anchor chain brought up into the ship?

  • @dacelutamilekega2586
    @dacelutamilekega2586 Рік тому

    Me just chuckling while remembering all of my moms Navy stories, this being one of them.

  • @lordmephisto6654
    @lordmephisto6654 Рік тому +1

    "This is usually done via a process simply known as a 'manual check' " LOL

  • @rl8571
    @rl8571 Рік тому +6

    Anchor drops on a Navy ship is a very intense event with no less than 6 people for their larger sized ships. Then i went on a luxury cruise ship which was bigger than an AS or AD, and the anchor drop had only 3 people and they were casually chatting while the anchor was dropping. Go Navy!

    • @thornil2231
      @thornil2231 Рік тому +3

      Go Navy , because it takes 6 guys to do a mindless job that 3 people do while casually chatting?

    • @nix4644
      @nix4644 Рік тому

      @@thornil2231 Can you say 'facetious'...

    • @kirkkirkland7244
      @kirkkirkland7244 Рік тому

      It never bothered me dropping the anchor on my ship! It's a pretty safe operation as long as you know what your doing!!!

  • @deirdre108
    @deirdre108 Рік тому +4

    This was interesting. My squadron berthing compartment on CVAN-65 USS Enterprise was just aft of the fo'c'sle, the compartment where you see the chains in this video. It was kind of a nice place to hang out unless the Bos'n's were doing maintenance or anchor drops. We were caught in a typhoon in the South China Sea and the waves were so high that water was entering the anchor chain holes (sorry, I forget the nautical term for these, I was an airedale) and flooding into our berthing compartment.

    • @baraxor
      @baraxor Рік тому +3

      Hawse pipes.

    • @deirdre108
      @deirdre108 Рік тому +1

      @@baraxor Thanks! I could have never remembered that term.

  • @kwanwang9787
    @kwanwang9787 Рік тому

    Few hundred year old corals: exists
    Battleship anchor: oops

  • @dafterite
    @dafterite Рік тому +1

    "The anchor is far from the only part of the aircraft carrier that needs regular inspection and maintenance."
    Just in case you thought everything else on an aircraft carrier could be ignored and still function properly.

  • @Chuck59ish
    @Chuck59ish Рік тому +8

    Tailhooks on land based fighters are nothing new, we had them on the McDonnell-Douglas CF-101 Voodoo that was built in the 1950s, hook was on a spring steel arm like a big leaf spring in your truck and had to manually set back into place. In fact on the TV show My Three Sons, the character played by Fred McMurray, Steve Douglas, was a McDonnell-Douglas Engineer attached to an Air Base in California where there was a F-101 Voodoo wing.

  • @Kane-ib5sn
    @Kane-ib5sn Рік тому +7

    if the woman narrating these videos is also producing them - she's absolutely brilliant at what she's doing. the specifics of the technology, and an eye for the beauty of the thing she's describing. very accurate.

    • @viperdemonz-jenkins
      @viperdemonz-jenkins Рік тому

      am sure she is part of the NAVY, she know the subject far to well to not be.

  • @stavrospapadimitriou7631
    @stavrospapadimitriou7631 Рік тому +1

    There is some irony in the phrase" The vessel's ability to fulfill its mission safely" when the prime purpose of an aircraft carrier: a weapon if you like, is to facilitate death.

    • @PoppiB
      @PoppiB Рік тому

      while that is true, the death is not intended for the operators of the aircraft carrier.... it's all in the prospective.

  • @jppagetoo
    @jppagetoo Рік тому

    Thanks to all that are serving and have served.

  • @Urbicide
    @Urbicide Рік тому +9

    There is a neat video here on YT showing a navy ship losing it's anchor & chain during a training exercise. A couple of very brief clips from the video were shown in this video. The wildcat could not stop the rapidly free-running chain, & the whole length of the chain ended up on the sea bottom. There was so much rust dust kicked up by the chain that you could barely see. Check it out.

    • @joelpatterson9410
      @joelpatterson9410 Рік тому

      yeah just fantastic)

    • @tomtransport
      @tomtransport Рік тому +2

      I saw that, I also commented----"Chain made in USA wildcat (brake) made in China". Oops.

    • @johnlucier5654
      @johnlucier5654 Рік тому +1

      Yeah that was an amphib landing ship I think pretty fat anchor and chain. Not quite as big as the CVNs tho. That video lookd like a disaster scene for sure and it looked like it caused damage.

  • @robertmcdonnold3038
    @robertmcdonnold3038 Рік тому +8

    No mention of showing the anchor being dropped at "full-speed". What does arresting Lines and the airforce have to do with anchors. You should have tried a little harder to present the anchoring system of a ship. Two unrelated stories presented together.
    Do better next time.
    Your welcome
    Bob

  • @johnjones3967
    @johnjones3967 Рік тому +1

    ‘Waayyy thee anchor’
    ‘How much does it weigh?’
    ‘I don’t know, I forgot.’

  • @brudug713
    @brudug713 Рік тому +2

    I was on sea &anchor detail on CV~67 USS John F Kennedy. On starboard forward catwalk. When I hear a change in the sound of anchor running out, faster and faster. Call comes over sound power headset : clear the catwalk runaway anchor. I barely stepped inside when the bitter end whipped out and took off catwalk.

  • @CRAZYHORSE19682003
    @CRAZYHORSE19682003 Рік тому +19

    Fun fact, it is the weight of the chain that keeps a ship in place not the anchor itself.

    • @raikeycs6056
      @raikeycs6056 Рік тому

      fun fact u make no sense

    • @2112jonr
      @2112jonr Рік тому

      I believe you're a troll sir !

  • @timdelvillar8063
    @timdelvillar8063 Рік тому +3

    Okay, Air Force, that cobweb at 11:45 is UNSAT!
    I never saw one of those aboard ship.

  • @timotmon
    @timotmon Рік тому +3

    This is cool, I was in a squadron on USS Saratoga and then the USS Enterprise.. even though I've been in this space at the forecastle many times I never got to see the anchor actually being dropped.

    • @PoppiB
      @PoppiB Рік тому

      it's loud, and the RUST DUST is blinding.

    • @timotmon
      @timotmon Рік тому

      @@PoppiB Yeah, I do remember hearing it! Our birthing was above it. So rust dust, I see they have eye protection.. what about their lungs?

    • @PoppiB
      @PoppiB Рік тому

      @@timotmon all these after-thoughts, We’ve only had anchor chains for what 150 years?
      My berthing was under the starboard cat. My rack tree was only 2 high because of the cat tunnel. Got to the point where I couldn’t sleep if we weren’t launching…

    • @timotmon
      @timotmon Рік тому

      @@PoppiB God I know.. I used to jog through the hanger bay while the corrosion teams were painting their birds in the wide open. What was I thinking? If I remember they were supposed to be using a sort of epoxy safer than polyurethane or something like that. Then I found out our corrosion team was using the unsafe version on the ship, then it turned out most of the squadrons were as well.

    • @Fazzel
      @Fazzel Рік тому

      I was a black shoe on the USS Constellation for 3 years and the only time I can recall the anchor being used was one time when we were in Hong Kong harbor. For some reason we couldn't dock there. Of course if you are tied to the pier you don't need to use the anchor. (For those that don't know, a black shoe is someone permanently assigned to the ship and a brown shoe is the people assigned to a squadron and go where their squadron goes.)

  • @robroskey6515
    @robroskey6515 Рік тому +1

    It's crazy to me how many different and massive components and areas of the ship it takes to operate a carrier. Nevermind a small city worth of people.

  • @aldolajak1267
    @aldolajak1267 Рік тому +6

    I like the cool high tech car-tire component of the Air Force's BAK-12 system.

    • @ginog5037
      @ginog5037 Рік тому +1

      It was probably a $20k modification...lol

    • @hairyparatestes1183
      @hairyparatestes1183 Рік тому +1

      That high tech tire probably cost the American tax payer $26k knowing our Federal government.

    • @jeremyhess7977
      @jeremyhess7977 Рік тому

      Yeah...that's some hokey shit right there. 😂

  • @geraldwhite583
    @geraldwhite583 Рік тому +4

    imagine how much power they could recover with a kinetic charging system

    • @SaintSaint
      @SaintSaint Рік тому

      Good thought! I guess dropping anchor fast is important for an aircraft carrier. So it would have to be something that could disengage.

  • @desertegle40cal
    @desertegle40cal Рік тому +1

    Only 4 minutes in and already saw one of my aircraft carriers. The Carl Vinson. That was my first carrier CVN-70. Then when that dry docked in 2006, i was attached to CVN-74 The John C. Stennis. Both ships were my home for cruises and workups. Spent almost an entire year on the Vinson when our cruise was extended from 6 to 8 1/2 months, plus the two and a half months doing workups in the pacific. I lived on the Stennis for about 9 months including workups after the Vinson went into dry dock. I was attached to a squadron VFA-154 The Black Knights on both ships. Was one of the greatest experiences of my life. If there wasn’t so much drama, high school crying BS, dumb officers who were smart as a box of hammers and the toxic masculinity exerted from nerdy cowards who have some vendetta to settle form getting beat up so much in high school, i probably would have stayed in.

  • @desertegle40cal
    @desertegle40cal Рік тому

    LOL, the greatest feat one must get over while living on an aircraft carrier, in my opinion of course, is where the air wing sleeps. We slept two decks DIRECTLY BELOW flight deck and on deck below the arresting gear machines. It goes, flight deck, the arresting gear deck and then the air wing birthings. On both my cruises most of our sorties were flown during the day so if you were on night check you had to sleep through aircraft basically landing on your head. The thump, then the high pitched grinding whistling noise of the arresting gear machines doing their thing was loud as heck! It takes you about a month to not hear them anymore and THEN you can practically sleep through a hurricane.
    Fun fact, the best sleep you’ll ever get on a carrier is in rough seas. The aircraft carrier is so big that it just rocks you to sleep and you feel you can sleep forever. Its is the best sleep i think ive ever gotten in my life lol.. Also, for a reason that is pretty understandable, most of the birthings are found in the middle of the ship. Not many in the bow or aft of the ship because it its hard to sleep when the aft and bow are getting the most travel. I remember this one time where we went through the Atlantic when we did our world cruise on the Vinson and it was like 40 foot swells with clear blue skies. We had a Halo Xbox tournament in the bow of the ship on our way home. Which ill remember for the rest of my life because three of my buddies and I entered the tournament and we were doing GREAT! But then all of a sudden you saw one person get up and run out of the shop they were holding it in, then another, and another. My team was in second place and in the runnings for the final round. But then the tournament coordinator cancelled the tournament for the day because too many were getting sea sick because of where the tournament was located. That pissed us off because the day they had it next was on a day where the air wings was back to flying sorties when the seas got calm again. So we couldn’t compete! It was for a brand new Xbox and the newest Halo game. We were going to win it for our AM shop for everyone to play when they were off duty as well as watch movies.. But nope, because a bunch of green gills never left their shops and never experienced rough seas like the ones we were in, they cancelled it due to so many people getting sea sick. We could have won that xbox! And we didn’t get our 25 bucks back either! Oh well. LoL

  • @deadpeng
    @deadpeng Рік тому +3

    Pretty dangerous job for the workers in that anchor room. I am sure any accidental physical contact with that metal beast is going to shred anyone.

  • @jamesgrandt8194
    @jamesgrandt8194 Рік тому +14

    The birthing compartment my division was assigned aboard the USS Coronado (LPD-11) was where the anchor shaft was located. Being in the rack when the anchor was dropped was like having an earthquake.

    • @johnlucier5654
      @johnlucier5654 Рік тому +6

      LOL you mean berthing though with all the women coming back from cruises pregnant perhaps someday they will rename it.
      If you think anchor drops were noisy, nearly any berthing space on a CV is a racket when flight ops are going on. Air wing personnel are berthed just below the hangar deck and our work spaces are just below flight deck. You get used to the noise.

    • @casajump
      @casajump Рік тому +4

      @@johnlucier5654 Air Wing VAW-125 berthing area right below the third arresting cable on CV-60. I can sleep through almost anything now.

    • @ogbytes
      @ogbytes Рік тому +2

      My berthing compartment was in the same place on the FID. All the way forward by frame 5. Ig the hook wasn't being dropped; the cats were in use during night flight ops. Like Greg J. stated, I can sleep through almost anything.

    • @PoppiB
      @PoppiB Рік тому

      @@johnlucier5654 also on CV-60, OPS berthing is right below the forward cats, my rack was the top rack under the starboard cat. When I say under, the normal rack configuration is 3 high, mine was 2 high, and sitting up had me head against the overhead (ceiling). During a deployment, after a week, I couldn’t sleep unless we were launching.

    • @PoppiB
      @PoppiB Рік тому

      @@ogbytes last time I saw FID & SARA together was in Newport RI. They were way too quiet. I got to go down the pier, when SARA was being towed off to Texas. No pumps, no hull noises. It was obvious, she was dead.

  • @ericjohnson6105
    @ericjohnson6105 Рік тому

    Those few years of ships without anchors was particularly exciting.

  • @billkallas1762
    @billkallas1762 Рік тому +2

    I'm surprised that they didn't explain how anchors actually work. Most people have the wrong idea.

    • @PoppiB
      @PoppiB Рік тому

      if they are talking about their own 20' motor boat, then they have it 100% correct though.

    • @billkallas1762
      @billkallas1762 Рік тому

      @Skylet Floral Just key in "How do anchors work:?

  • @foute90s
    @foute90s Рік тому +19

    I doubt anchors usually are made of heavy metals (mercury (Hg), cadmium (Cd), arsenic (As), chromium (Cr), thallium (Tl), and lead (Pb)) as stated in this video. Usually its just a steel alloy.

    • @Xbob42
      @Xbob42 Рік тому +1

      I think they meant "the metal is heavy," not specifically that it's actually made of heavy metals which is a bit of a silly thing to say, yeah.

    • @tampoponomonogatari
      @tampoponomonogatari Рік тому

      I caught that too, he could've phrased it a little better.

  • @Mordalo
    @Mordalo Рік тому +5

    No carrier drops the anchor at full speed.

    • @frednutz1604
      @frednutz1604 Рік тому +4

      And from what I saw none of the ships in this Video did.

    • @Mordalo
      @Mordalo Рік тому +2

      @@frednutz1604 Did you read the headline?

    • @raybin6873
      @raybin6873 Рік тому +1

      I noticed that too...watched video thinking they were going to do that.

    • @MervandtheMagicTones
      @MervandtheMagicTones Рік тому

      The anchor is moving at full speed, not the carrier

  • @idonwantella2824
    @idonwantella2824 10 місяців тому

    The final question for my ESWS was "Where were the anchors manufactured"? I do not have the slightest clue now, but that was 21 years ago.... Earning ESWS on an LHA was my most satisfying achievements during my service. I do regret not getting EAWS but it was far more difficult because the Aviation divisions were too busy to sit down with us.

  • @revie3745
    @revie3745 Рік тому

    "your hearing loss is not service related"😂

  • @calvinh.8882
    @calvinh.8882 Рік тому +3

    I'd love to have about 400ft of that Aircraft Carriers anchor chain to use as a fence around my house. lol. That would be awesome!

    • @tommurphy4307
      @tommurphy4307 Рік тому +2

      the fence posts would cost a FORTUNE.....

    • @charlesforrest7678
      @charlesforrest7678 Рік тому

      Fences always make good neighbors.

    • @calvinh.8882
      @calvinh.8882 Рік тому +1

      @@charlesforrest7678 Yes they do. But I just have one around my house, not my entire property. I live in the center of 10 acres and have a couple of acres around my house fenced.

    • @PoppiB
      @PoppiB Рік тому +2

      @@charlesforrest7678 Good fences make the best neighbors.

    • @charlesforrest7678
      @charlesforrest7678 Рік тому

      Something is better than nothing.

  • @onair6652
    @onair6652 Рік тому +6

    Love and respect for the troops

    • @prissweb
      @prissweb Рік тому +1

      Nice virtue signal.

  • @mattalden10
    @mattalden10 Рік тому +2

    its terrifying how much energy and mass is being handled by those chains.

  • @charlesvanderhoog7056
    @charlesvanderhoog7056 Рік тому +22

    One fun fact about these massive aircraft carriers is that they tend to move so fast that it is too dangerous to waterski behind it when the line is attached to the stern.

    • @richardpark3054
      @richardpark3054 Рік тому +7

      Rats!

    • @ablemagawitch
      @ablemagawitch Рік тому +15

      especially when the Captains wants the crew to row it faster .....

    • @johnstreet819
      @johnstreet819 Рік тому +4

      A friend was aboard the U.S.S. Enterprise (building 65 for those of us from P.S.N.S. Bremerton) on it's shakedown cruise. Two destroyers twisted their shafts trying to keep up. She was running on one reactor and two steam generators at that speed.

    • @RCAvhstape
      @RCAvhstape Рік тому +1

      @@johnstreet819 Enterprise had 8 reactors. She was only using one?

    • @foobarmaximus3506
      @foobarmaximus3506 Рік тому

      @@johnstreet819 bullshit

  • @johnirwin1837
    @johnirwin1837 Рік тому +3

    Not all Air Force pilots need to be trained on the arresting system. Very large aircraft such as the B- 52, B-1, B-2 C-17, C- 5 don't need them or can use them. They use other means to slow the aircraft. Just so you know.

    • @napiersliberty
      @napiersliberty Рік тому +2

      and none of those planes land on carriers

    • @johnirwin1837
      @johnirwin1837 Рік тому

      @@napiersliberty , true, but they said "ALL pilots" when talking about the arresting system used by the USAF.

    • @jeremyhess7977
      @jeremyhess7977 Рік тому

      Even if they tried to land on a carrier, they couldn't take off again. USAF aircraft don't have launch bars.
      And their tailhooks and landing gear aren't beefy enough to withstand a trap or a cat launch on a carrier anyway.
      Upon contacting one of the 4 arresting cables, the tailhook would be ripped off, the landing gear would crumple, and that F-15 Eagle would either foul the deck as a fireball or slide off the bow and get ran over by the carrier.
      It'd be better to just punch out and have the SARs come pluck your dumb ass out of the water. 😂

  • @mobydick3895
    @mobydick3895 Рік тому +2

    These ships are about as intricately engineered as devices designed by humans can get.

    • @francisharkins
      @francisharkins 10 місяців тому

      *Self operated Satellites and deep space telescopes* Am I a joke to you?

  • @Knucklehead123
    @Knucklehead123 Рік тому

    Am just a proud American every time I see our fine, fine military - my heart swells with pride really. So lucky to be an American.

    • @mmmuuubbb
      @mmmuuubbb Рік тому +1

      Careful with the heart swelling. That's a lifetime of medical debt in the Land of the Free.

    • @Knucklehead123
      @Knucklehead123 Рік тому

      @@mmmuuubbb It is an expression, not a description.

  • @fletchermunson6225
    @fletchermunson6225 Рік тому +3

    No one appears to have hearing protection. Imagine the noise when the anchor is dropped! See you folks at the VA hospital or hearing loss.

    • @PoppiB
      @PoppiB Рік тому

      each and every one of them have hearing protection. That said, there are numerous law suits for less than effective hearing protection. I used the foam plugs and the mickey mouse ears, and could still hear the anchor system. to be honest, I don't think there is any hearing protection that would help with this level of noise.

    • @fletchermunson6225
      @fletchermunson6225 Рік тому

      @@PoppiB Too bad the Navy didn't take it seriously when I was in, my hearing would be better now. Too many big guns and no effective protection.

  • @olenilsen4660
    @olenilsen4660 Рік тому +4

    Once you mention that "without this system, aircrafts would need an entire runway to land" you should also specify what you mean by an entire runway, as it is highly specific to the make and model of aircraft trying to land. A Boeing 747 needs 2km + whilst a small propeller plane might need only 2 feet.

    • @JC.998
      @JC.998 Рік тому

      You do realize the numbers you just stated are absolutely ridiculous right. 🧐☝️

    • @olenilsen4660
      @olenilsen4660 Рік тому

      @@JC.998 Nope. Check out STOL competitions ;) I mean really small, really light aircraft.

    • @lukew6725
      @lukew6725 Рік тому

      Meanwhile a Harrier only needs the the length of the plane to land.

    • @AA-tz2bm
      @AA-tz2bm Рік тому

      @@olenilsen4660i swr they levitate