Combined Error of Earth Curvature and Refraction

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 13 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 197

  • @mamyramer1603
    @mamyramer1603 2 роки тому +29

    Who else is here becouse of a flat earther?

  • @jaialai3257
    @jaialai3257 3 роки тому +15

    How can refraction be calculated on distance alone? Wouldn't the amount of this deviation vary due to things like air pressure and density, humidity, temperature, and elevation?

    • @MalcolmTexxx
      @MalcolmTexxx 2 роки тому +2

      Yup.

    • @ithinkthonkthunk5333
      @ithinkthonkthunk5333 2 роки тому +1

      Correct - the problem is that the horizon is not geometric.

    • @omarkos54
      @omarkos54 2 роки тому +3

      True. Refraction varies due to atmospheric conditions. However under "ordinary" atmospheric conditions the refraction is a function of distance, and the distances used in making long sights are generally short enough that anomalous atmospheric conditions will not affect the value very much.

    • @ithinkthonkthunk5333
      @ithinkthonkthunk5333 2 роки тому +2

      @@omarkos54 whats the refraction in antarctica on any ordinary day compared to hawaii? No such thing as “ordinary refraction”! Cool story though!

    • @omarkos54
      @omarkos54 2 роки тому +1

      @@ithinkthonkthunk5333 Thanks for your question. “Standard” refraction correction is taken as 1/7 of the curvature correction.

  • @manjakarakotoarisoa5930
    @manjakarakotoarisoa5930 3 роки тому +8

    Three flat earthers didn't like the video.

    • @theengineeringsurveyor7872
      @theengineeringsurveyor7872  2 роки тому +4

      Yes....they from stone age

    • @ithinkthonkthunk5333
      @ithinkthonkthunk5333 2 роки тому +2

      @@theengineeringsurveyor7872 2 questions if you would be so kind to share some insight.
      1. How can a high pressure system exist next to a non-pressurized system (10^-17th torr) without a solid barrier of separation?
      2. Is earth’s horizon geometric (physical)?
      Thanks 🙏

    • @oswald9723
      @oswald9723 2 роки тому +5

      ​@@ithinkthonkthunk5333 you can if a force exterts on the gases thus creating pressure. Here the force is gravity. However on earth we have a pressure gradient, something that cannot exist inside a container. Which debunks any containers hypothesis.

    • @ithinkthonkthunk5333
      @ithinkthonkthunk5333 2 роки тому

      @@oswald9723 false…gravity is not a force. Newtonian gravity is 100+ year out of date pseudoscience that had been replaced by Einstein’s conjured psuedo-riemannian 4space bendy space time snafu.

    • @ithinkthonkthunk5333
      @ithinkthonkthunk5333 2 роки тому +1

      @@oswald9723 false…you cant have gas pressure without containment. One must first have gas pressure BEFORE one can have a pressure gradient.

  • @pattobey3388
    @pattobey3388 2 роки тому +3

    I have asked the following question on many curvature videos but no one has yet provided me with an answer?
    Using known curvature calculators would it be possible to have a line of sight between 2 locations separated by 430 km? What should the curvature drop be?

    • @theengineeringsurveyor7872
      @theengineeringsurveyor7872  2 роки тому +4

      No.These curvature equations are valid only for shorter distances less than about 10km. If this distance is greater than that, most of the assumptions made to derive the equations are not valid.

    • @patricktobey7724
      @patricktobey7724 2 роки тому +6

      @@theengineeringsurveyor7872 so are you saying that there is no scientific formula that can calculate the line of sight between 2 locations of similar elevation distant from each other at 430km?

    • @jayh9529
      @jayh9529 2 роки тому +1

      Jtolen media 1 channel has a few examples

    • @ithinkthonkthunk5333
      @ithinkthonkthunk5333 2 роки тому

      @@jayh9529 love JTolen…dang right he does - he has very long distant vids. Definitely flat

    • @ithinkthonkthunk5333
      @ithinkthonkthunk5333 2 роки тому +1

      @@theengineeringsurveyor7872 curvature equations made from assumptions are NEVER valid from any distance mate bc curve only exists in your imagination. Start with the alleged earth 🌍curve formula which is 8”x miles ^squared for an @25,000 mile circumference ball. Prove this first!

  • @davidebianculli9192
    @davidebianculli9192 Рік тому

    What about earth curvature correction with instruments like laser trackers or total stations? do you apply the same correction for the elevations of the points measured in a cartesian coordinate reference frame?

  • @All_BlaqQ
    @All_BlaqQ Рік тому +1

    How do you establish R?

  • @GodFearingg
    @GodFearingg 7 місяців тому +1

    The mental gymnastics Globers have to do 🤣

    • @shadowdan1177
      @shadowdan1177 5 місяців тому

      So trigonometry is now mental gymnastics?

    • @broggy52
      @broggy52 4 місяці тому +1

      Ymean having common fuckin sense?

  • @aboddbeky8622
    @aboddbeky8622 4 роки тому +3

    You are genius i will share this with my course mate 👌🏻👌🏻😍

  • @crediblebytes
    @crediblebytes Рік тому +3

    Takeaways... refraction has minor impact if any at all. Refraction can't ever refract more than the level line (C). In other words worst case scenario r == C and that would make it impossible for someone to see an object that supposedly is below the horizon by more than C. Refraction seems to magically curve the same direction as earth and never any other way. 🤔

    • @tims5268
      @tims5268 Рік тому +1

      Of course it curves the same direction as Earth's surface. You understand why right? Think about how refraction works, it should be very easy for you to figure this out yourself, no magic is needed, just critical thinking skills and a fully functional brain, good luck. LOL

    • @crediblebytes
      @crediblebytes Рік тому

      @@tims5268 ya refraction distorts and blurs objects and doesn’t let you see behind things. Your thinking of a mirror buddy. It’s called reflection.

    • @tims5268
      @tims5268 Рік тому +1

      @@crediblebytes HAHHAHAHAHA No, I am talking about refraction. Have you figured out why it curves in the same direction as Earths surface yet? It really isn't hard, keep trying. Think about how refraction works, I asked my 13 year old and they figured it out pretty quick.

    • @crediblebytes
      @crediblebytes Рік тому

      @@tims5268 Have you found the curve yet? Does your google math tell you anything about how refraction compresses, stretches, and distorts the image?

    • @kitcanyon658
      @kitcanyon658 Рік тому

      @@crediblebytes : LOL. Way to be so obvious in running away from his question about how and why the earth's shape has something to do with refraction and its effect on view objects. That's so flatter, bro. Try manning up some science.
      Or are you one of the flatters who claims all science is fake and made up just to control the masses. Is that it?
      And you claim to know math? That's rich. After all, no flatter will ever write out an equation, much less solve it, to map the sun's position in the sky on FE. Why is that? Because they don't even know basic trig. When people who can actually do math attempt to "solve" that FE riddle; quess what? It can never, EVER, get the sun's position in the sky correct.
      Why is that? Globe model and the solar system gets it correct every day of the year from every location on the planet using spherical coordinates. Shouldn't something as magically true as FE be at least as good as the FE map and model?

  • @srinivasan.m7236
    @srinivasan.m7236 3 роки тому +1

    Super...good sir,... please help more....

  • @acinad4605
    @acinad4605 3 роки тому +1

    How about when D is in miles and feet?

  • @danielrickel8807
    @danielrickel8807 2 роки тому

    So just how far can I see the ground if the earth is a globe? I swear I’ve seen the bottom of buildings from 30 miles away!

    • @hatlessjet7802
      @hatlessjet7802 Рік тому +2

      There is curvature. The curvature is very slight so you can’t see it. Only when you are up high. Flerfs love to be stupid and it’s easier to say leveled or flat when it’s on property. The horizon is curved due to earth having atmospheric refraction. You know nothing about any calculations

    • @hatlessjet7802
      @hatlessjet7802 Рік тому

      Just saying

    • @ValkyrieRiderIPT
      @ValkyrieRiderIPT Рік тому

      ****I swear I’ve seen the "bottom" of buildings from 30 miles away!****
      ROTFLOL!! Then, you weren't 30 miles away...Or...Your lying because a curved Earth destroys your flat Earth hoax.

    • @kitcanyon658
      @kitcanyon658 Рік тому

      If you're about 6ft tall on a ground that is level the further point you'd see (horizon) would be about 3 miles. If you saw the very bottom of a building 30 miles away, you'd have to be about 600ft higher than the ground level where the building is located.

    • @diverdannavyvet9672
      @diverdannavyvet9672 8 місяців тому

      Then you either need new eyeglasses or you're lying.

  • @armorvestrus4119
    @armorvestrus4119 Рік тому +2

    Dude come on, really? Who are you kidding all Surveyor's know the Earth is really Flat. They just do not talk about it.

    • @kitcanyon658
      @kitcanyon658 Рік тому +2

      That's false and just a lazy excuse for not doing your research.

  • @drdayguy
    @drdayguy 2 роки тому +2

    Can you just fix my computer?

  • @CheesieGamer
    @CheesieGamer 2 роки тому +1

    And this is why what you see there.. Is a mirage xD

    • @hatlessjet7802
      @hatlessjet7802 Рік тому +1

      There is curvature. The curvature is very slight so you can’t see it. Only when you are up high. Flerfs love to be stupid and it’s easier to say leveled or flat when it’s on property. The horizon is curved due to earth having atmospheric refraction. You know nothing about any calculations

  • @vimalramachandran
    @vimalramachandran 3 роки тому +2

    Well explained, Thank you!

  • @ndtcivil9199
    @ndtcivil9199 3 роки тому +2

    Super

  • @joeconrad9147
    @joeconrad9147 2 роки тому +1

    If a 40 foot tall ship was 20 miles out to sea, how much of the earth's curvature would be hiding it?

    • @MalcolmTexxx
      @MalcolmTexxx 2 роки тому +2

      Alot by that equation, yet... You can literally zoom in to ships far out as far as a camera or binoculars will let you, and still... The earth is mind numbingly big.. or something is wrong.

    • @ithinkthonkthunk5333
      @ithinkthonkthunk5333 2 роки тому +1

      …it depends on observers height & refraction.
      Without either it would be @227 ft.

    • @joeconrad9147
      @joeconrad9147 2 роки тому +1

      @@ithinkthonkthunk5333 you can lay on your stomach on ventura beach and see the arch

    • @joeconrad9147
      @joeconrad9147 2 роки тому +1

      @@MalcolmTexxx 24000 plus miles in circumference they tell us

    • @ithinkthonkthunk5333
      @ithinkthonkthunk5333 2 роки тому

      @@joeconrad9147 lol 😂…do you mean the curve? Thats bc of your decreased viewing angle. Rob Skiba did a short but fascinating experiment on this. ua-cam.com/video/q9rnfps6WmA/v-deo.html

  • @flattenthecurve8623
    @flattenthecurve8623 3 роки тому +5

    A level line is not a curved line.

    • @hatlessjet7802
      @hatlessjet7802 Рік тому +1

      Sort of. Depending on what you mean. Leveled can mean curve or flat, depending on how you use it. This is to show the curvature math

    • @flattenthecurve8623
      @flattenthecurve8623 Рік тому

      @@hatlessjet7802
      GlobeHeads are just stupid idiots. After all, they deny the laws of thermodynamics, all of physics and geometry so that they can kneel down at the altar of Globe Earth Religion.

    • @flattenthecurve8623
      @flattenthecurve8623 Рік тому

      @@hatlessjet7802
      Hey dummy, how do you level a curved line? Ohhh wait, you’re a dummy, and that’s why you think level is curved.
      Globe Earth is a Ridiculous Religion Fool.

    • @hatlessjet7802
      @hatlessjet7802 Рік тому

      There is curvature. The curvature is very slight so you can’t see it. Only when you are up high. Flerfs love to be stupid and it’s easier to say leveled or flat when it’s on property. The horizon is curved due to earth having atmospheric refraction. You know nothing about any calculations

    • @hatlessjet7802
      @hatlessjet7802 Рік тому

      @@flattenthecurve8623 leveled can be curved. People call it that because it’s easier to talk about than saying “is your property leveled? Well actually it’s not perfectly flat but yes it’s level.”

  • @mrdr1ggy
    @mrdr1ggy 2 роки тому +3

    you have to assume there is a curve on the earrh prior to this investigation. the problem is, curve of the earth has never been detected or recorded. the opposite has been recorded in high altitude helium balloons and with regular strsigh flat camera lense you will always see a FLAT Horzion LINE.

    • @VivekanandaKF
      @VivekanandaKF 2 роки тому +5

      With enough money, you can see the curvature for yourself. SpaceX/Virgin Galactic/Blue Origin are waiting you.

    • @doddermodd
      @doddermodd 2 роки тому +3

      Link one of these "regular lens" videos that shows a "flat" horizon. I'm interested.

    • @hatlessjet7802
      @hatlessjet7802 Рік тому

      Bro shut up. The earth is not flat

    • @hatlessjet7802
      @hatlessjet7802 Рік тому +2

      There is curvature. The curvature is very slight so you can’t see it. Only when you are up high. Flerfs love to be stupid and it’s easier to say leveled or flat when it’s on property. The horizon is curved due to earth having atmospheric refraction. You know nothing about any calculations

    • @diverdannavyvet9672
      @diverdannavyvet9672 8 місяців тому

      😂🤣😝

  • @tonyornelas9374
    @tonyornelas9374 3 роки тому +6

    Why cant people accept the fact the benchmarks prove that water is level? Its data that has been around for over 100 years and was done by line of sight. All surveyors work off the same benchmarks and plane surveyors never account for curvature but the geocentric ones say they do.
    I'm I the only one that sees the deception? What is driving the fear of honest surveyors to settle this issue?

    • @MalcolmTexxx
      @MalcolmTexxx 2 роки тому

      Exactly

    • @ithinkthonkthunk5333
      @ithinkthonkthunk5333 2 роки тому

      Excellent comment!

    • @joeconrad9147
      @joeconrad9147 2 роки тому +1

      Even a blind man could tell you he isn't on a spinning waterball

    • @ithinkthonkthunk5333
      @ithinkthonkthunk5333 2 роки тому

      I thought everyone believes::
      - level = curved
      - horizons are geometric

    • @oswald9723
      @oswald9723 2 роки тому +4

      it's because you don't know the definition of level on large scales:
      Definition of level on large scales, Merriam Webster : Adjective, (entry 3 out of 3) having no part higher than another ; conforming to the curvature of the liquid parts of the earth's surface

  • @flattenthecurve8623
    @flattenthecurve8623 3 роки тому +6

    Hahaha 🤣 GlobeHeads are getting desperate.
    The Earth is Flat and Motionless. Every survey of every piece of property on earth is measured using horizontal distances exclusively. There is zero curvature!! If there was, you could win Dave’s three Bitcoin.
    Globe Earth is a Religion Fools.

    • @selflessserviceful
      @selflessserviceful 2 роки тому +6

      😂😂 coming from someone who believes the earth is flat! 😂😂 beliefs based on facts arent religions. The sad part is this "theory" has to keep being tested 😂

    • @oswald9723
      @oswald9723 2 роки тому +6

      ​@@selflessserviceful flerfs be living in complete ignorance. The number of DJs, musicians, artists, weed farmers, unemployed flerfs I have discussed with thinking they knew better than actual experts...laughable 😂🤣🤣

    • @doddermodd
      @doddermodd Рік тому

      If Earth was flat tutorials like these would not exist. Grow up.

    • @flattenthecurve8623
      @flattenthecurve8623 Рік тому

      @@doddermodd
      Globe Earth is a Religion Fool.

    • @doddermodd
      @doddermodd Рік тому +4

      @@flattenthecurve8623 Why would they make engineering tutorials on how to factor in a variable that doesn't exist?

  • @ithinkthonkthunk5333
    @ithinkthonkthunk5333 2 роки тому +5

    Level is NOT curved, it is flat & horizontal!
    Earth is observably & mathematically flat & can be treated as such when measuring elevation angles. Elevation angles can not be measured with a curved adjacent (baseline). The use of a sextant backs this claim.

    • @oswald9723
      @oswald9723 2 роки тому +6

      Level is considered flat on small distance because the curvature isn't noticeable on small distances. However on long distances the level is considered curved as parallel to the surface of the earth. If you check the Merriam Webster dictionary, one of the definition (the one used for large structures) is :
      Definition of level on large scales, Merriam Webster : Adjective, (entry 3 out of 3) having no part higher than another ; conforming to the curvature of the liquid parts of the earth's surface

    • @ithinkthonkthunk5333
      @ithinkthonkthunk5333 2 роки тому +1

      @@oswald9723 so you think level is curved? Do you think men can get pregnant 🫃too?
      Also, the curvature is not noticeable on long distances either bc its flat. Just watch 200 proofs & see for yourself. Elevation 📐’s need a flat baseline to be measured. This is all you need to understand if you know triangles dont have curve? Critically think!

    • @oswald9723
      @oswald9723 2 роки тому

      @@ithinkthonkthunk5333 you tell me to watch 200 proof yet I'm the one indoctrinated? Let me guess you don't workd any way near any scientific field, found flat earth physics easier and let a yoga teacher convince you with 200 proofs that have been debunked 100times ? I can send you 3 complete debunk of the whole thing at least lol. But you're the one that got fooled by conmen using your ignorance.
      And yes level is curved on long distances that how curvature works on a planets when you're as small as a human, every engineer knows it and use for large structure, but again, you obviously don't know anything about this kind of job do you? I could show dozens of methods to see the curvature if you would like. But you first need to answer the other topic.

    • @maorgabai6139
      @maorgabai6139 2 роки тому +4

      @@ithinkthonkthunk5333 and again the lack of scale understanding of Flerfs 🤣🤣🤣

    • @omarkos54
      @omarkos54 2 роки тому +5

      @@ithinkthonkthunk5333 Actually, we don't "think' level is curved. It is a fact. This is not some flerfer debunking video. It's a tutorial for Engineers and Surveyors on how to do their JOB GIVEN the FACT that the Earth is a sphere. "level" is a surface that is perpendicular to the pull of gravity. On a spherical planet (as all planets are) that pull is toward the center. Therefore the "level" surface is curved. If it were not (over long distances of course) the "horizontal surface" you describe would deviate from the earth's surface and be higher in altitude at one end than the other and no longer be "level".

  • @thomaskielbania6781
    @thomaskielbania6781 Рік тому

    Lol. Cartoons

    • @hatlessjet7802
      @hatlessjet7802 Рік тому +1

      There is curvature. The curvature is very slight so you can’t see it. Only when you are up high. Flerfs love to be stupid and it’s easier to say leveled or flat when it’s on property. The horizon is curved due to earth having atmospheric refraction. You know nothing about any calculations

    • @thomaskielbania6781
      @thomaskielbania6781 Рік тому

      Did you just call me a freed and then spout absolute be and no science at all?
      You think the horizon(horizontal) is curved??????
      Wrong!!! The earth is a circle, but not a ball . Water does not magically bend in oceans and not rivers.

    • @hatlessjet7802
      @hatlessjet7802 Рік тому +1

      @@thomaskielbania6781 bruh. You can’t see the curve from ground level. The earth is huge with a slight decline

    • @hatlessjet7802
      @hatlessjet7802 Рік тому

      @@thomaskielbania6781 I can give you science facts. You think very stupidly. Did you know J tolan lied about how far away he was on the 1000 mile video? I can give you proof

    • @hatlessjet7802
      @hatlessjet7802 Рік тому

      @@thomaskielbania6781 there’s no proof of flat earth. Also when you see a ship go away from the ocean, you don’t see the bottom because the earth is curved. It’s not based on perspective. If it was then everyone would know and the earth would be flat but that’s not the case. If it was you would be able to use a telescope to see a lot more than you would and simply the higher you go up the more you see but you can’t see everything because the curvature exists. The laser tests that supposedly prove the earth was flat is not true. That was a lie and I can prove that to you. I listen to real facts about science that is true. I’m not indoctrinated, you are because you listen and believe to many flat earthers who make up nonsense and bs without any proof. They just say it’s proof but it’s not. You don’t even do your research and experiments, if you did the right experiments and research then you would realize that the earth is an imperfect sphere and not flat. Here is a link about the horizon:
      education.nationalgeographic.org/resource/horizon/#:~:text=Astronomical%20horizons%20are%20great%20circles,the%20shape%20of%20the%20Earth.

  • @savemoneyongroupon
    @savemoneyongroupon Рік тому

    How do you not know the earth is flat when you are a land surveyor? 🙄

    • @ayodyabulathsinhala336
      @ayodyabulathsinhala336 Рік тому

      You can not find it.. it is similar to
      Collimation error. And can be nullified by taking equal Backsight and foresight lengths

    • @kitcanyon658
      @kitcanyon658 Рік тому +1

      Because they're educated.