Complex Analysis 33 | Residue for Poles

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 25 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 16

  • @premkumar-so3ff
    @premkumar-so3ff Рік тому +4

    Very cool thing about your video series was they are short and concise. I was doing algebra from 3 months and i wanted to switch to analytic number theory study and for that i want to revise complex analysis and your playlist does thing at ease. Please make such videos on probability theory at measure theoretical level. As your videos saves time for any person if not able to cover voluminous text books. Thanks again

    • @brightsideofmaths
      @brightsideofmaths  Рік тому +3

      Thanks a lot! I have the same for probability theory and measure theory :)

    • @brightsideofmaths
      @brightsideofmaths  Рік тому +1

      You can check my webpage for that if you are interested: tbsom.de/s/mt

  • @CrimsonSquaredX2
    @CrimsonSquaredX2 2 роки тому +7

    Do you have any plans to talk about the Riemann-Stieltjes integral? Maybe as an addendum to your real analysis course?

  • @krishnenduhazra7396
    @krishnenduhazra7396 Рік тому +4

    In your full playlists of paid membership have you covered conformal mapping part?

  • @Ghetto_Bird
    @Ghetto_Bird 10 місяців тому +1

    Will the Riemann mapping theorem or any other conformal mappings also be discussed in future videos?

  • @kamranabdulkhaev1767
    @kamranabdulkhaev1767 2 роки тому +2

    Cool!

  • @kamranabdulkhaev1767
    @kamranabdulkhaev1767 2 роки тому +9

    How many parts are in the plan?

  • @navierstokes2356
    @navierstokes2356 2 роки тому +5

    Do you have any opinion on Bak and Newman's book on complex analysis?

    • @brightsideofmaths
      @brightsideofmaths  2 роки тому +2

      I don't know it but I have to say: most of the books about complex analysis are good!

    • @navierstokes2356
      @navierstokes2356 2 роки тому +2

      @@brightsideofmaths Do you have a personal favourite one?

  • @syvisaur7735
    @syvisaur7735 8 місяців тому +1

    Wait so why are we writing it like this? Isn't that just Cauchy's integration formula written in another form?