It's a great plugin. I've been Beta Testing the plugin with my S5X and it's been really useful, the calibration is not massive, but I can certainly tell the difference. Great work folks.
I have an RME Interface, what do you think about putting the values of the file into the Room EQ of RME Totalmix software? Is it relevant ? I can't put the values with the comma, (for exemple a 0.94 value will be set to 1). Or its better to put a Pro-Q3 in my DAW at the start of the chain which can accept values with numbers behind a comma ? That said i really love how you manage the brand, how fast you answer by email or on gearspace. It will push me to be loyal to the brand envisaging to buy a S4R :)
You can use the closest number that RME can support. I'd always go for a separate headphones channel calibration rather than master channel inside DAW. But you need to have that kind of hardware. UCX and UFX both have it. ADI as well I think. So you're ready for a seamless workflow! Thanks for the support! RG
@@olloaudioThanks for the quick response, but I don't want and I don't need to use third -party software to listen to music. In my opinion, if there is stand-alone mode is the best solution. I'm S4X 1.2 owner, and bought it directly from OLLO website.
@@Taisuei The USC is not system wide or standalone, but you can import USC calibration directly to Realphones that is a System wide plugin. If that's what you're after, it's possible. Basically the same thing as if the USC plugin would have a system wide feature. You can also use the calibration with any other EQ enabled software as explained at the end of the video here: 13:06
It's a great plugin. I've been Beta Testing the plugin with my S5X and it's been really useful, the calibration is not massive, but I can certainly tell the difference. Great work folks.
🔥🔥🔥
The USC basically increases / decreases some frequencies based on the actual headset frequency response curve, is that correct?
Yes it does fix tolerances and also improves on asherence to target.
Just to be sure, I don't need realphone, I can just use the USC, right?
Yes
Is the USC calibration going to improve the Frequency Response of a S4X 1.1 version?
Yes, slight correction. Between one and two dB.
I have an RME Interface, what do you think about putting the values of the file into the Room EQ of RME Totalmix software? Is it relevant ? I can't put the values with the comma, (for exemple a 0.94 value will be set to 1).
Or its better to put a Pro-Q3 in my DAW at the start of the chain which can accept values with numbers behind a comma ?
That said i really love how you manage the brand, how fast you answer by email or on gearspace. It will push me to be loyal to the brand envisaging to buy a S4R :)
You can use the closest number that RME can support. I'd always go for a separate headphones channel calibration rather than master channel inside DAW. But you need to have that kind of hardware. UCX and UFX both have it. ADI as well I think. So you're ready for a seamless workflow! Thanks for the support! RG
I need stand-alone mode, for work with other music playback software.
Check 10:20
@@olloaudioThanks for the quick response, but I don't want and I don't need to use third -party software to listen to music. In my opinion, if there is stand-alone mode is the best solution.
I'm S4X 1.2 owner, and bought it directly from OLLO website.
@@Taisuei The USC is not system wide or standalone, but you can import USC calibration directly to Realphones that is a System wide plugin. If that's what you're after, it's possible. Basically the same thing as if the USC plugin would have a system wide feature. You can also use the calibration with any other EQ enabled software as explained at the end of the video here: 13:06