Harry Potter Book vs Movie in a nutshell: - But there's a lot that happens in between these scenes. - But Ron actually said this - This was a huge mistake from the screenwriters part - That's another example of movie depicting Ron badly and Hermione good.
The book had tons of good Ron/Hermione and Harry/Ginny moments. •Ron asking Hermione out to dance at Bill & Fleur's wedding in front of Krum. It's great character development from Ron's side as he learnt to control his jealousy from three years earlier. •Hermione comforting an upset Ron at Grimmauld Place when the patronus warns them about the other Weasleys on the run. •Ron worrying over a minor thing as the fate of the Cattermoles that even Harry notices that Ron's innocent gesture almost makes Hermione initiate their first kiss. •Harry making sure Ginny is safe at Hogwarts with that Marauders Map.
I also love how Harry says "I would feel the same way" about Ron being relieved of the Weasleys being safe, then _explicitly thinks about Ginny_ , and corrects himself to saying "I _do_ feel the same way".
I hated them cuting out kreacher how much he seems to like Harry after he helps fulfil Regulus’s wishes and gave him his locket made me smile every time I read it.
Although I stand by the movies’ decision on cutting RAB and kreacher. As it helps greatly with the Hallows part 1’s pacing and the flashback didn’t make much sense to me and felt out of place when considering Harry and Dumbledore’s experience in the half-blood prince. 1. Kreacher broke way too easily(for a house elf working under the black’s for quite a long time he must’ve been a master at using words and keeping off the truth as the Black’s didn’t have a very clean history. 2. Kreacher could’ve simply apparated out of the cave with RAB(according to the half-blood prince, the inferior attack begins approximately after a minute from emptying the bowl and retrieving the locket. Time more than enough for them to both apparate. Other than that I agree with your point the scene in the book was really emotional and heart warming.
@@saeshwaran there's a big issue with your second point. Regulus ordered Kreacher to leave the cave, destroy the locket, and leave him behind. Kreacher couldn't disobey his master's orders, especially a master that he absolutely loved.
17:00 also victor krum asks Harry if Ginny was single and Harry responds by saying that she has a big jealous boyfriend despite him being her last boyfriend and her being currently single. It was really funny!!
Books: Promote a Ron/Hermione & Harry/Ginny ending and oppose a Harry/Hermione one. Steve Kloves: How 'bout I ignore all this because I ship Harry/Hermione and hate all the Weasleys. Also Steve: Puts in unneeded tension between Harry and Hermione while at the same time butchering Ron and Ginny's characters. Me: THIS IS AN ADAPTATION NOT A FANFICTION, STEVE!!!!
@@LE-zy2od Because he couldn't disrespect the books like the Perry Johnson films did to their source material, so he cleverly ended up sidelining Ron and Ginny to make Harry and Hermione come off as better our of spite.
@@LE-zy2od They weren't allowed to make drastic changes to the timeline, I.e Hermione and Harry Marrying. As such, they made subtly, what some may see as trivial changes, but these had a massive impact on Ron and Ginny's characters.
I think the only change that all Potter heads will universally agree that the films did better was Hedwig's death in this one. In the book, she dies helplessly in a cage. But this film improves it by making her defend Harry while flying from a Death Eater.
Well, I disagree. The scene doesn't make sense in the movie. Why would Harry let Hedwig go in the first place? That was extremely irresponsable. And how Hedwig knew that Harry was being attacked? And how Hedwig knew who was the real Harry? In the books it's sad and helpless, but that's how it's supposed to be. Adding random heroic moments doesn't make something automatically better.
@@mikemarsh3569 nah he read half the book which would take at least 5-7 hours if he did it all at once (which is unlikely) editing would take another 2-4 hours and the recording would take 1 hour (thats excluding the possibility of retakes which probably took another hour). The movie itself is 2 and a half hours combine that with the fact that he would probably watch it 2 or 3 more times to make sure he got everything that leaves us with about 20-24 hours of pure hard and tedious work.
@V1p3r Actually yeah, I forgot to add the Movies runtime combine that with him probably watching it a few times to make sure would make it 22-24 hours of work.
Book: Hermione is very sad about Ron's leave and Harry is keep checking whether Ginny is OK. Movie: HERMIONE AND HARRY ARE DANCING AND NEARLY KISSING AFTER RON'S LEAVE.
Whoever worked on POA would have given us what we wanted. I still remember the first time I saw POA, I realized Ron and Hermione would make a lovely pair as I saw that chemistry spark between them
@@robertappiah8996 Yeah PoA movie was way more partial to Romione. Too bad Kloves changed Ron defending Hermione to him agreeing with Snape. If they hadn’t changed that and have Ron get all his lines back i think even more people would like their relationship.
@@puttrik4865 It was balanced in the first three films and the fifth one, due to Columbus style of being somewhat faithful to the books, and Goldenburg being more appreciative of Ron’s character.
@@scaranvostok3637 yeah i honestly cant understand how they got such incompetent writers and directors for these movies. Obviously Columbus was by far the best one and Goldenburg's style would have worked well for the later ones.
People who have only seen the movies: Harry and Hermione should have ended up together. . Harry(book version): She's like a sister. I LOVE HER LIKE A SISTER and it's always been like that. I thought y'all knew. Besides, hooking up with Ron sounds better. . Hermione(book version): You guys seem to forget that I was the original Harry/Ginny shipper all along.
Movie vs Book after the Locket Horcrux gets destroyed Movie: Ron: Only three to go haha Harry: Fine you can have the girl. Who was Ginny again? Book: Ron, you are my best friend and my brother and we need you, and she’s hopelessly in love with you and now you can finally understand how much you mean to us and can stop feeling inferior *hugs*
That scene was completely ruined in the movie! Harry is unneccessarily mean and even yells at Ron to destroy the horcrux. And Ron doesn't even apologize for hurting Harry. Whereas in the book Ron is devastated and Harry patiently encourages Ron, by reassuring him that Hermione is like his sister. And the hug showed just how deep their friendship is in the books.
@@breezy3392 All of Harry's relationships with the most important characters in his life in the films are screwed up. Shipped with Hermione (Why?), his dynamic with Ginny completely absent so it makes viewers question why he ended up with her, and his and Ron's Dynamic is butchered.
The worst part of this film, isn’t all the harmione shipping like the comments are acting like, there’s something worse. The film just disrespects the entire book, but not including any of the dumbledore backstory, thats like the main core of the story, that’s what this is about, when you strip away all the amazing set-pieces, you just have a tragic tale of harry’s perception of dumbledore just gone. There’s so much i could go on, but this is whats most important in the story, and that needed to be in the film. Edit: like im not even a harmione shipper, im a full time romione boi. But this shit just infuriates me, since this is my favorite book.
YES!!!!!!!! That was my biggest issue, the other movies did pretty good about staying with the books, but DUmbledore's backstory WAS the reason everything else happened. I couldn't believe the skipped his funeral as well, I cried when I read it, also they have Harry break the elder wand instead of what he did in the book. I hate the D.H movies because they strayed so far from the book.
Pretty sure the news Moody interrupts from Tonks in the movie was her pregnancy. Not that they had gotten married. As that she says “My HUSBAND the joker.” After Lupins line about Bills injuries.
I just sat down with a bowl full of pasta looking for something to watch and was greeted by this video, uploaded 11 seconds ago. You're just on time, Morgan, thanks!
The movie skipped over how Harry becomes obsessed with the Deathly Hallows something which exactly happened to Dumbledore and also how Hermione gets downright scared about the existence of the Hallows, being in constant denial of it. It kind of tells you how despite being so knowledgeable, she can be narrow minded about certain things, not willing to think outside of the logic of the world.
Shows Hermione is human and has flaws AKA not allowed especially in the later films, which sucks so much because it's one of the things that I could relate to her on, maybe not to that extent but I can understand the need for logic Also I doubt they wanted to put that bit about Harry thinking that the hollows could defeat the horcruxes because then they would have it seem as though someone other than Ron wanted the wand, one of many intentional instances of showing him in a bad light making it seem as though he's power hungry 🙄
@@Heartshapedbox81 it would have been cool to see the Hallows play an actual role in the eventual outcome of the conflict between Harry and Voldemort. It doesn't happen in the books.
@@sreenivaskamath4243 The entire end result is a direct result of one of the hallows though. The only reason why Harry didn't lose to Voldemort at the end was because of the ownership rules of the Elder Wand. Harry was the wand's true master since he disarmed Draco who had disarmed Dumbledore before he was killed by Snape If Voldemort had killed(or even disarmed) Malfoy at any point before Harry had disarmed him he would have been the true master of the wand and would have easily won the Battle of Hogwarts
When Bellatrix tortures Hermione at Malfoy Manor: Book Ron: HERMIONE! HERMIONE! Movie Ron: Too mildly concerned as if she were some random girl he met an hour ago. Audiobook Ron (Stephen Fry version): HEEERRRMMMMIIIOOOOONNNEEEEE! HHHHHEEERRRRRRMMMMIIIIOOOONNNEEEE!
For real, I remember reading that when I was 12 and the scene was intense as hell. Ron seemed like an unhinged liability, as if he was also feeling the pain of what was going on with Hermione, with the added element of not actually knowing what they were doing. In the film he’s like, barely into the situation. I swear, the more I look into it, the more it seems like they absolutely hated Ron’s character and had him in the movies out of obligation, since everything that made us care and the majority of his personality was stripped away.
Part where Dudley and his auntie both showed some type of respect and upset over leaving harry is so well written and so unfortunate how it never made the movie.. the fact they both realise shits about to hit the fan and Harry was in danger. like having an annoying little brother you think nothing will ever happen to.. then suddenly he's grown up and gone to fight in a war.. so sad, so beautiful.. makes you feel every tiny bit of they're emotion.
Nah man. Dudley yes, but aunt?? Hell no. She couldn’t bring herself to say anything to him except the word bye. She cried her eyes out over Dudley in that scene meanwhile Harry is the one in mortal danger and she doesn’t do anything to make up for the years of abuse
Bellatrix torchering Hermione (Rons love!!) Ron in Books : Losing it ; despredly trying to save / help her Ron in the movie : Calm and like "I guess we should do something"
@@dibblidyy it is ablest to correct people’s spelling and grammar. They may be dyslexic or not have the access to a full education. What are you getting out of trying to make someone feel stupid? Fair game if it is a troll, but this is just a comment.
I guess it’s reasonable that you wouldn’t notice that, since there’s the fact you told your girlfriend you didn’t like sand as a pick up line which somehow worked.
@@irishkingarsenal6268 Not luck. You also told her you murdered hundreds of sand people and she still fell for you. Pretty sure you’re wife is a psychopath.
This is the perfect timing I am lying sick in bed and just looked for something to watch before going to sleep. Thanks a lot for all your great videos :)
The film also cut out Hermione attempting to repair Harry's wand and reminding him that Ron's wand was never the same after it got broken, which was the first time that either of them had said Ron's name since he walked out on them and that was when he heard it through the Deluminator
MovieFlame has to be one of my favourite youtubers, he’s such a down to earth guy and is super genuine. I love all his videos and his whole presentation is incredible, seems like an awesome dude who’d be even cooler to hang out with
@@MovieFlame holy shit I really didn’t expect that at all, again proving my point that your genuine and care about your viewers. I’m ecstatic that you read, and acknowledged my comment means so much
You making these videos is making it easier to read the books, for scenes not shown in the movies it’s easier to picture them when you describe them to us! Thank you for the amazing work as always!
I also think it's a terrible change in the films that the polyjuice potion still keeps your voice, especially with it being contradicted in the Goblet of Fire film.
Fun fact for any who didn’t know already, the actor for bill, is the son of the actor for mad eye, so his character says that his dad’s character is dead
I read the books but didn't see the movies until last year. But when I talk about harry and hermione with my friends they always tell that they like their chemistry. But I was so confused after hearing that as in the books they are like siblings and best friends. Then last year I saw the movies and understood their points. But I love the fact that the books told us that a boy and a girl can be "only" friends.
idk, personally, even before the latter movies came out and we only had the books to go off of, I always kinda shipped Harry and Hermione. It was fine either way, but they always struck me as a better fit.
@@QuantumAscension1 I disagree about the part of them being a better fit. They aren’t a bad ship, but it’s canon that there is NO physical attraction or passion between them. Harry’s type is Quidditch players with a dark sense of humour. Hermione isn’t one and he doesn’t find her as fun and laid back as Ron is. Plus, Hermione’s too bossy and nagging of him and sometimes is scared of his temper. Hermione also was keen on hooking Harry and Ginny up together as she gave the latter dating advice regarding Harry. Harry hates bickering which Hermione desires in a partner. And the only person who consistently does that to her is Ron. And Harry telling Ron that his feelings for Hermione have always been platonically like that of surrogate brother kills any chance of HHr. It’s frustrating how the filmmakers ignored all this.
@@QuantumAscension1 shipping non original couple is fine and dandy but what the movie did is basically equal to fanfiction writers trying to paint the original couple as toxic because that's the only way their ship made sense in their fanfic
it's bizarre that they barely touched on Lupin and Tonks' relationship, since Harry’s the freaking godfather of their child, which they also never acknowledge
Dude when my brother watch this movie with me, he was so confused when Harry said, “Lupin, your son-.” My brother asked me (because he knew I read the books) if Lupin had a baby and how did Harry know. All I could say is read the books.
@@Capri_00 it's awesome that he started them and that he's on the 2nd one already! I also saw the movies before I read the books and felt confused sometimes. 😄
@@cookiemonster6468 he is on book 3 and he’s reading them when he goes to lunch during work. He says that HBO max should make this a series and I agree. The movies had to skip over so much to keep the main plot going. A series may be hard to do but it could be awesome.
@@Capri_00 that's awesome! And yes, if they turn Harry Potter into a series, that would be legendary. I've actually talked about the same thing with some of my friends and they all agree that 8 movies weren't enough to cover the whole story. So I'm sure that people would be all over the series if J. K. Rowling asked Warner Bros or another studio to do it.
Yes. The only good change in the movie. She died saving Harry whereas in the book she died without any purpose. But then I don't like the movie Harry telling Kingsley Hedwig gave him away.
@@dannyjorde2677 She knows exactly where to find any person Harry tells her to, without any prior knowledge, yet she doesn't know that a battle is taking place when dozens of people on brooms are flying and throwing curses in the sky above her? Owls are far smarter than you might think in the Harry Potter universe.
@@denisucuuu I know they can find any person they want, but it still makes no sense that Hedwig knew there would be a battle. What, was she chilling at The Burrow and then thought "I sense that my master's in danger!". Come on.
so evidently they KNOW how to establish a convincing romance, but they did it for the one pair that was NOT supposed to be a couple. and failed miserably with every canon couple in this series. wow.
It almost would have been better if they had just committed to not following the books for the romances. At least they would have been set up properly. They kind of went for the worst of both worlds, setting up fanfic romances but going with the real romances anyway. Not sure which would have been worse.
ikr... i was like wtf hell did you say that hermione...🤦🤦🏻♂️ trust me, i started with watching the movies and i really hoped harry and hermione would end up together, i was bit disappointed when hermione ended up with dull ron... then, i read the books and i understand why that scene was like fuking stupid and awkward... oh and i was originally hoping harry would end up with cho and then ginny suddenly became relevant... and i was shipping harry and luna cuz they always spend time together.... but weird ginny became harry's love interest.. so in conclusion, read the book first and immediately watch the movie of the respective book (so you know which character is which)
13:04 this always bugged me about the picture frames - even if Hermione’s parents’ memories had been wiped or changed, the events within the photos would STILL have happened so Hermione shouldn’t have disappeared from them (unless Hermione removed her image from the photos using magic too) but unless that’s confirmed, it’s still an error!
The picture frame thing was just the movie version of confirming she's out of her parent's life now, I think it was a really well done scene and preferred it a lot more to the version Hermione gives of this in the book. But then again there are some things that just work better in movies than in books and vice versa.
Either way in the books she never obliviates them rather alters their memory. She finds them and changes the memories back. She never permanently erases their memories like in the movies as she loves her parents too much to do this
I think the concept of Harry leaving Hedwig to the wild was a better idea than in the book since it shows Harry's selflessness and it makes more sense than a common spell
Wait what? He was leaving Hedwig to the wild? My interpretation is that he was allowing Hedwig to fly with them so she'd be one less thing to carry on the bike. I do prefer Hedwig sacrificing herself for Harry to just dying in her cage though.
What are you talking about? The fact that Harry leaves Hedwig to the wild in the movie only shows sheer irresponsibility, as the Death Eaters know exactly what Harry's owl looks like. That's why in the previous books they couldn't risk using Hedwig to send messages, because she would be in danger of being attacked. The most logical and natural thing is to have your pet with you at all times so you can protect it.
Great breakdown. The one miss was Mr. Wesley's reaction to the attempt at being questioned on the Harry Potter escort from the Dursley's.Nothing and no one was going to keep him from checking on George It's one of the few times you understand that Mr. Weasley was a very protective dad and a person you could not intimidate or force no matter the circumstances, even by friends. Sadly, BOTH times.. it's cut from the film.
28:42 Agreed. In the book there were loads of examples of Ron comforting Hermione and standing with her either in the Burrow or Grimmauld Place even against Harry's occasional snaps. and later on when they were locked in the manor, Ron went ape shit crazy as Hermione was tortured upstairs and Harry was urging him to be quiet. Non of that happened in the film. To the film's credit, they tried to hint such examples, but you can't portray Ron and Hermione close together and Harry isolated as they were talking behind him and stop when he is around, and Harry even confronted them before Ron's departure - was mentioned in the screenplay, but not in the film - and portray Ron being jealous that Harry and Hermione being close as they are. You can't do these two things together as bland as it was in the film. It's been said numerous times that the films did Ron bad and this series is a good testimony to that. Also Ron after Hermione treated his wound in the tent, his first thought was his concern about The Cattermoles and the muggle borns that they helped escape and he rejoiced when he found that they obtained the locket, and he - along with the others - had a good mood occasionally when there was good food around and not a constant grump like the films did.
When Voldemort interrogates Grindelwald about the Elder Wand: Book Grindelwald: GTFO I rather die than tell you everything *gets murdered* Movie Grindelwald: Oh hi Tom let me spill everything graciously *gets spared*
Harry and Hermionie when ron leave in the books: Confused, depressed, sad, hungry, on the edge of giving up, on the edge to cry, on the edge to die Harry and hermionie in the movies when Ron leaves: Haha romance lol
'Confused, depressed, sad, hungry, on the edge of giving up, on the edge to cry, on the edge to die' Lol that's literally what they showed in the movie, but some people who are bad at human relations take it as romance. Hermione touched Harry? OMFG THEY ARE HAVING ROMANCE
@@fngrlss7923 They danced together, they almost kiss. Idk if you've ever been close like that to someone but when someone dances with you and then looks into your eyes, they want to kiss you
Changing the death of Wormtail in the movie was a huge mistake. In the third book we see Harry saying to Dumbledore that it's his fault that Voldemort will come back because he didn't let Sirius and Lupin kill Wormtail. Then Dumbledore tells him that it will come a day when he will be glad that he saved Wormtails life, because when a wizard saves another wizard a bond between them is formed and Wormtail will be in Harry's debt. So Wormtail failed to kill him and the hand that his master gave him chockes him as a punishment to his betrayal.
I agree. And this is why the books are better than the movies. There are a few things in the movies that I like than in the book, but these were mostly in the first three movies. The latter ones not so much.
A super small detail that wasn’t in the movie, Harry’s polyjuice potion was golden and smelled/tasted really good, it’s a cool distinction that shows Harry’s good spirit in comparison to crabbe and goyle
I need a count of every time in this series when he says: "The movie cuts from this scene to this scene, but there's a lot that happens in between these two scenes in the book."
I had totally forgotten that scene, and after re-reading Deathly Hallows I'm bitterly disappointed it's not in the movie. It once again shows Harry's quick-thinking and would have been such a great scene!
In the movies, ginny is barley in them, you could remove her from script and nothing would change. Well except for chamber of secrets but you get the idea.
You are not serious about removing Ginny, are you? Because if you are then stop watching the movies and pick up the books and read them carefully instead of skimming through them
@@Anonymous-gf5gl Ginny is harry’s love interest and they end up together, in the movies they don’t even talk to each other. She has literally zero character development and barley relevant to the plot of the movies (again except for chamber of secrets). So yeah, I am serious.
@@Anonymous-gf5gl She meant Movie Ginny. And I would add Movie Ron too. The films should have killed Ron and Ginny off. It would have prevented the anguish of watching these two massacred……..🤣
The enormous effort you put into these videos is impossible not to notice. Your passion for what you do and for the source material is on full display. I look forward to these videos unlike any other YT content. Excellent work dude.
YES!! Thank you!! 😃 She MODIFIED her parents' memory, NOT Oblivate!! THAT scene ALWAYS bothers me in the movie!! Especially since she DOESN'T Oblivate the muggle girl in the diner later!! 😠😠
6:55 I liked Harry's comment on Duddly's unexpected demeanor "Blimey, Dudley, did the dementors blow a different personality into you?" :"D Also when he was arguing with Vernon about the importance of them leaving, it shows how their morphed relation from the first time they were introduced to the final time they were together, and although Harry didn't have any good memories in the house, he reflected upon his time there. One of the few things that the film got right. Few.
I blame the directors, they shipped Harry and Hermione so much when it was obvious in the sixth book that Harry and Ginny were going to end up together and Ron and Hermione since the 4th and 6th. What did they think J.K Rowling was gonna change her mind for book 7 or something? 🤦
@@DLR1997 Really, well dang. But still the movie is based off the book, it was already published so she couldn't change it if she wanted to unless J.K. does a test on and say after 30 years they divorced.
Having Harry reading the articles in the movie would probably bore the audience to death, so, I can see why they skimmed around them. But, cutting out crucial moments like Dudley saying goodbye to Harry, the Tonks house, and Lupin's subplot, were truly missed opportunities.
9:10 I can get behind that change, because in the book he use it against Stanley Shunpike who was under their magic unwillingly, so Harry didn't want to hurt him, which lead later to his argument with Lupin when he criticised such move. But since Stanley wasn't in the film, it made sense to have Hedwig being the give away clue and adds depth to her final act with Harry.
It's amazing how much development Dudley of all people got throughout this series, despite not being active in the majority of it. And it's a shame that they cut it from the final version of the film.
The movies literally ruined Ron and ginny's character. Although for me, the harry potter books will always be superior to the harry potter films. But you cannot deny the fact that the harry potter films are the best book-to-movie adaptations. They just give you that nostalgia everything you watch them. I would personally love to watch an 8 hour long harry potter movie but lets just talk sense. And after watching the films, while re reading the books again (after countless re reads already) I see (in my mind's eye) the magical world which harry potter movies created. I in my imagination think of Daniel as harry, Rupert as ron, Emma as Hermione and all others in their respective characters. There can't be any other actors who could have done that. But the major problem with the films is the character of ron and ginny. Otherwise, I loved the movies. If these two (Ron and ginny) were portrayed the way they were originally written, it would have been such a flawless representation of the books. And its nothing to do with the actors. I cannot imagine anyone else playing the roles but its just the way these characters have shown completely opposite personality traits (which is the most problematic thing with the films). Ron was a bit jealous of harry in the books too but was never a complete a*s hole. Ron always stood up for Hermione and harry. When snape called Hermione an insufferable know it all, Ron was the one who stood up against snape and told him off while the movie ron was enjoying it and said that snape is right. Ginny was so confident, independent, charming, beautiful and mature in the books. She barely cried when harry told her that they can't be together anymore. She told him that she knew this was coming and was actually supportive. But the film ginny was just obsessed with harry and she was always crying and was not herself. It made people think that she might have given harry a love potion. They actually made it look like that Harry and Hermione were supposed to be together and are the perfect match for each other and that's why people who've only seen the films feel like that too.
I don't. But besides that, that's actually one of the issues, she wasn't ever crying. you said she was always crying and I realize what you mean with her not being herself but Ginny's literally never crying, not on any of the parts where she was supposed to be, not at the start when she's half laughing and half crying because she's sad seeing her brother's go and she can't come with, not when she wakes back up in the chamber after almost dying seeing a giant snake dead, they erased her from the scene going back into the castle (but I guess I shouldn't be surprised by that they did the same thing with Ron when he was in the hospital Wing inside the Half-Blood Prince AKA none of his family came to see him as they were supposed to) they skip Dumbledore's funeral so we can't go on that but she wasn't crying with everyone else in that scene either and last but certainly not least she was not crying when her own damn brother died! Whom she was close to, but you would never guess that by the movies, so no. they didn't have her being a crying mess because at least then that would have been a way for the audience to connect to her but instead they went the completely opposite route and seem to have instructed her to show no damn emotions! so that way the audience won't connect to her, you know who was crying all the time though?...
38:30-38:56 I one hundred percent agree. The movies should have taken that route. "In the book there was nothing to see." THANK YOU! The movie making it seem like Harry and Hermoine could be a couple always bothered me. I am curious if the movie's change on that is why the author said her comments about Harmony having a chance if she were to rewrite it. Perhaps she is wrong about the movie influencing her. If that is the case I am glad she finished writing before the movies showed their take on Ron's Harmony jealousy. Book-wise there would have to be a lot re-written to even make Harry and Harmoine actually like each other that way as neither character ever thinks about the other in such a way. The Harry and Hermoine dance moment is the worst moment in the whole of the HP universe canon or non-canon. The real problem with it is nothing leads up to it other than what the people involved with the movies wanted and Ron's jealousy and the crew wanting/needing drama between the trio. All of this doesn't just ignore book relationships, but also ignores setup movie relationships. Harry has been dating Ginny and doesn't break up to protect her, as in the book.
@Unoriginal Name (-_- ) But I won’t want current Rowling to be involved in the production, she should just be a consultant. Who knows if the next remake allows Rowling more credit, she may retcon half of her stuff to something worse than Rowling. Only a pair of faithful hardcore book elistists should produce the remakes……..
@@scaranvostok3637 It’s her book and what exactly is she doing? Everyone makes her sound like Voldemort that she’s so hateful but the reality is I don’t think she is exactly what everyone’s making her out to be I think she is a strong advocate against children being medicalized and I think she’s always been that way especially with like mood stabilizers and things like that I don’t think she’s this hateful person I think her main issue is just against children being medicalized unfortunately with the extremism in all politics even a slight disagreement gets you labeled as hateful and the people being hateful to her Are horrifically extreme and I never see examples as to why they’re treating her this way.
@@Maverick4267 Dude, look at what Rowling has done since 2007. She’s been adding weird stuff in interviews and stuff about saying Dumbledore is gay, Ron and Hermione have a doubtful marriage, Werewolves are like AIDS inflicted people and making the FF movies which partially retcons canon. The worst thing she did to pull the straw was claim Cursed Child as canon, which is such an insult to the original novels much like Disney is to Star Wars. Tbh, Rowling lately hasn’t been doing anything good to HPverse and it’s better that she wouldn’t retcon canon again.
@@scaranvostok3637 So what? It's still HER creation! Those are her charaters, it is her world! She can change and add what ever she likes! Why dose a canon have to be something unchangeable forever? People do change. Their ideas can change too over time and influence their point of view on their creation.
The best part of this video is seeing Morgan actually trashing Steve Kloves. This was the first time in this series that he explicitly mentioned his name, and it was really fun to watch. It's like going from You-Know-Who to Voldemort.
This mini series has taught me that literally any one who has an "eye description" will have it removed from the films. Rufus Scrimgeour went from yellow to brown Xenophilius went from cross eyes to not Mundungus went from bloodshot to not Voldemort went from red to white/pale blue? Hell. Even Harry went from Green to Blue. EVEN LILY WENT FROM GREEN TO BROWN
This and the last comparison video for Half Blood Prince felt more like Steve Kloves bashing videos and quite rightly so. I wish Goldenberg who screenwrote Order of the Phoenix did the screenwriting for the rest of the series.
Yeah, I wasnt a fan of the fifth one but I respected it as the book was incredibly long and had so many small and connected details that they would never be able to do everything so they focused on the important stuff.
Small Detail: In the book they actually didnt go straight to the woods, Hermione brought them back to Grimmauld Place but Yaxley caught her hand just before they vanished and the protection spell was broken so they then moved to the woods.
It was very very brief in the film. Freeze frame at the right second and you'll see the grimmauld place door where they lose yaxley. Then they apparate to the trees.
Writers: What should we have Hermione doing? Person 1: Dancing with Harry? Person 2: With Krum (deleted scene)? Me: How about dancing with Ron just like in the BOOK. Writers(angry): … Me: (gets yeeted out of the first floor)
So much of Dumbledore and Grindelwald was cut out of the movie. And now with the FB movies they're trying to bring it but there's one thing I didn't like. In the books, Dumbledore tells harry that he didn't face Grindelwald because he was afraid of knowing the truth about which wand killed his sister. Making him a human with flaws and fears unlike the perfect person we knew while he was alive. But in the second FB movie it says that he cannot face him because some blood pact. And that's cool I guess but for me takes away the humanization of Dumbledore in the book.
But we also see Dumbledore's pain and regret. Also in the book he DID face him because there was this epic duel beween them but in order to do so he had to destroy the blood pact first. Besides just because there is a blood pact that physically keeps him from fighting it dosn't mean he is also scared to face him because he didn't want to learn the truth about Ariana.
Great vids. The main takeaway for me is that they seem to have given most of Ron's good moments to Hermione and several of Hermione's good moments to Harry.
I think a lot of people dismiss the attempt a romance between hermoine and harry in the movies because the books instill in us that they have no romantic feeling toward each other. But the movies seem to NEVER actually address this except once in the 6th movie when harry dismisses dumbledore's remark (which was also such a weird interaction). I also quite disliked how Dumbledore in general was portrayed in the 6th movie, he was almost whimsical and it was very different to the way he had been in past movies... Loads of strange choices throughout the series.
Also in Yule Ball, they make Harry and Hermione a lot touchy with each other than they were in the books. They make Harry’s reaction to Hermione’s glow up make like mesmerised instead of platonic.
"After awhile, Harry found himself 'taking it out' to stare at Ginny's name in the girls dormitory" This is the biggest difference between the book, and the book vs movie videos!! Naughty Harry!😅😅 Love the videos in all seriousness
Whenever I see one of these videos I just have such a feeling to binge watch the whole lot, so I do. Honestly these take so much time and effort, at the end we have a perfect one for each movie. Well done Morgan!
Its interesting how when things from the book aren't in the films due to "save time" but theres so many instances of "this never happened in the book." What happens if you replace all the "never happened in the book" with the key parts that did happen, how much time was actually "saved"
07:01 It was in a deleted scene as well that we see a side of Petunia never shown before when she said "You didn’t just lose a mother that night in Godric’s Hollow, you know. I lost a sister." It parallels the situation in the book "She stopped and looked back. For a moment Harry had the strangest feeling that she wanted to say something to him; She gave him an odd, tremulous look and seemed to teeter on the edge of speech, but then, with a little of her head, she hustled out of the room after he husband and son." It might have been not the best way to relay such situation, but it is close enough to it.
Honestly the whole idea of the filmmakers deciding to do the Godric Hollow without the Polyjuice Potion completely baffles me, Harry is the most wanted wizard at the moment, and any slip-up could lead Voldemort to him. There's a reason why Hermione was so advocating for using the poly juice potion and then also using the invisibility cloak along with covering their tracks. It just made sense
17:45 I really think that's a sweet moment in the movies where Harry tries to save Ginny. I'm critical of the movies, but this scene in the movies is something I'd gladly prefer being canon (in the books).
Welcome to part 7 of MovieFlames's "There's a lot that happens between this 2 scenes" drinking game. How are you guys doing? Edit: Also the filmmaker's treatment of Ron is just unacceptable. Their fan fiction of wanting Harry/Herminone to be a couple really does nothing but hurt his character. This is probably why Ginny's character was butchered in HBP. They wanted Herminone to be with Harry so badly that they didn't care to make Ginny or her relationship with Harry interesting. Also Charlie doesn't appear, they cut Bill and Fleur's relationship, Percy's ark was cut, and Fred's death was offscene. The Welsley's really got shafted in the films.
And they were the first wizarding family Harry met since the night his parents were killed. They treated him as if he were one of them. Such injustice.
Really appreciate hardwork you put in these videos watch, reading movies and books again and again going through extra info, and facts is not easy thank you for this entertainment 💛💛💛💛💛
I wish they didn't show Grindelwald selling Dumbledore out, coz that scene in the book showed despite whatever happened, Grindelwald still had some feelings for his old friend, it also made me wonder after reading that scene that maybe Rita was right and Grindelwald just gave up fighting Dumbledore in the end 🤔
The part where Hermione used the spell to reveal everyone in Black's house and was unfunctionable with Kreacher, I thought the elfs were undetectable and went away with it. 😂
As this series is coming to an end I just wanna say thanks for putting all this together! I bet it took a ridiculous amount of time & effort. Great job man! What a great & insightful series
At the Malfoy's manor Voldemort yelled at Wormtail about keeping their guest quiet, and it was described as "with no change in his quiet thoughtful tone" in the book. It kinda startled me when I saw the film the first time as I wasn't expecting it :"D
These dissections give me life! I rarely watch the movies because of how much they changed even though I listen to the books on audible all the time. Don’t love how they changed it so much. Thank you for these & your honest opinions on what they changed!
Having Hedwig die trying to protect Harry rather than having her get hit with a curse inside her cage is actually a pretty good change that I prefer in the movie over the book. Hedwig showing her loyalty to Harry trying to protect him is such a sweet moment that I absolutely love
I remember this very well, as I also had to explain it to a friend. She said it has to be something so destructive, that the horcrux wouldn't be able to recover. She also added that there are very few things as lethal as basilisk venom, and that they're too dangerous to carry along. I think that last part fits fiendfire very well, since it's the main cause of Crabbe's death.
@@rustydaboyrobot there are a few other things too I think. But the only ones mentioned to be capable of destroying a horcrux are the venom and fiendfyre
** The fact that the only person Harry hugged longingly in the series is Ron tells you what Ronald Weasley means to Harry** just a little note for every person who doubts that Ron is the closest to Harry.
@@stilscarlott I've always seen their bond the same as James and Sirius but not like everyone thinks. Harry does not represent his father, but rather resembles the life of his godfather Harry = Sirius Harry mirrors a troubled Sirius, the fugitive from his abusive family, and a friend with a complicated temper . Ron = James Ron and his family echo James when he greets Sirius at his home The two are looking for fame and attention and are more clowning than their best friend
while i definitely agree with Morgan on hating the movie trying to make Harry & Hermione a couple, what i hated most about the DH1 film was Grindelwald's final redemption. in the book his exact line was "that wand will never, ever be yours, Voldemort", but the film just had him out who (he thought) currently owned the wand which i do not understand one bit and which drives me beyond insane at the screenwriters!
Harry Potter Book vs Movie in a nutshell:
- But there's a lot that happens in between these scenes.
- But Ron actually said this
- This was a huge mistake from the screenwriters part
- That's another example of movie depicting Ron badly and Hermione good.
- But in the book, this never happened
And that’s where the book and movie meet up again
So you need to take a shot of alcohol (your choice) every time he says any of those lines.
@@sj-62 How about each phrase having a different drink? That would be more fun
@@Ori_Kohav that works too! Either way, everybody will get drunk.
The book had tons of good Ron/Hermione and Harry/Ginny moments.
•Ron asking Hermione out to dance at Bill & Fleur's wedding in front of Krum. It's great character development from Ron's side as he learnt to control his jealousy from three years earlier.
•Hermione comforting an upset Ron at Grimmauld Place when the patronus warns them about the other Weasleys on the run.
•Ron worrying over a minor thing as the fate of the Cattermoles that even Harry notices that Ron's innocent gesture almost makes Hermione initiate their first kiss.
•Harry making sure Ginny is safe at Hogwarts with that Marauders Map.
I also love how Harry says "I would feel the same way" about Ron being relieved of the Weasleys being safe, then _explicitly thinks about Ginny_ , and corrects himself to saying "I _do_ feel the same way".
Also the scene when ginny was Harry's last thought before dying
Don’t forget Ron trying desperately to save Hermione when she was getting tortured, he even said they could have him instead of her
My fav Harry and Ginny moment is the Shoelace scene 😂😂
Don't forget Ron willing to sacrifice himself to Bellatrix so that Hermione wouldn't go crazy.
I hated them cuting out kreacher how much he seems to like Harry after he helps fulfil Regulus’s wishes and gave him his locket made me smile every time I read it.
Although I stand by the movies’ decision on cutting RAB and kreacher. As it helps greatly with the Hallows part 1’s pacing and the flashback didn’t make much sense to me and felt out of place when considering Harry and Dumbledore’s experience in the half-blood prince.
1. Kreacher broke way too easily(for a house elf working under the black’s for quite a long time he must’ve been a master at using words and keeping off the truth as the Black’s didn’t have a very clean history.
2. Kreacher could’ve simply apparated out of the cave with RAB(according to the half-blood prince, the inferior attack begins approximately after a minute from emptying the bowl and retrieving the locket. Time more than enough for them to both apparate. Other than that I agree with your point the scene in the book was really emotional and heart warming.
Yeah I loved Regulus and Kreacher's tale 😔
@@saeshwaran only reason I've seen is so his family would get searched for if he found out
@@saeshwaran but then voldemort would probably find out that RAB was on to him. It was absolutely essential thar voldemort did not find out
@@saeshwaran there's a big issue with your second point.
Regulus ordered Kreacher to leave the cave, destroy the locket, and leave him behind. Kreacher couldn't disobey his master's orders, especially a master that he absolutely loved.
17:00 also victor krum asks Harry if Ginny was single and Harry responds by saying that she has a big jealous boyfriend despite him being her last boyfriend and her being currently single.
It was really funny!!
yes I loved that so much!!
I didn’t read the books yet so this is the first time I’ve heard that and it is HILARIOUS
Books: Promote a Ron/Hermione & Harry/Ginny ending and oppose a Harry/Hermione one.
Steve Kloves: How 'bout I ignore all this because I ship Harry/Hermione and hate all the Weasleys.
Also Steve: Puts in unneeded tension between Harry and Hermione while at the same time butchering Ron and Ginny's characters.
Me: THIS IS AN ADAPTATION NOT A FANFICTION, STEVE!!!!
Preach!🙏🏻
Then why in end did he not have Hermonie and Harry marry in 19 years later
@@LE-zy2od Because he couldn't disrespect the books like the Perry Johnson films did to their source material, so he cleverly ended up sidelining Ron and Ginny to make Harry and Hermione come off as better our of spite.
@@LE-zy2od They weren't allowed to make drastic changes to the timeline, I.e Hermione and Harry Marrying. As such, they made subtly, what some may see as trivial changes, but these had a massive impact on Ron and Ginny's characters.
I didn't think Fred and George were handled too badly, but yes, most of the other Weasley siblings got the short stick
Your series gives the rare feeling of watching the movie and reading the book at a time.I enjoy it soooo much..feeling sorry, only one is left..😟
Here's hoping he does this for other series like Lord of the Rings and Narnia.
@@Makman1994 I dont think hes read those books (maybe he’s read Lotr seeing how popular it is) but he doesn’t make videos on them.
Maybe he could do a series like this for the Hunger games
hope for percy jackson will be 3 hrs long per video
@@housesuns-kings8480 I havn't seen or know anything else other than Harry Potter..😢😢😢😢😢😢😢
I think the only change that all Potter heads will universally agree that the films did better was Hedwig's death in this one.
In the book, she dies helplessly in a cage. But this film improves it by making her defend Harry while flying from a Death Eater.
Yes that’s they only change I like, and prefer. because the book version was really sad.
Yes, if there's something that the movie did better, that must be it.
I also love when Harry says to umbridge that she must not tell lies idk I just rly li that scene
Oh definitely
Well, I disagree. The scene doesn't make sense in the movie. Why would Harry let Hedwig go in the first place? That was extremely irresponsable. And how Hedwig knew that Harry was being attacked? And how Hedwig knew who was the real Harry? In the books it's sad and helpless, but that's how it's supposed to be. Adding random heroic moments doesn't make something automatically better.
The detailed script, the long voice recording, and the professional editing must have taken SO much time !
It took 46 minutes for him to make this video
@@mikemarsh3569 nah he read half the book which would take at least 5-7 hours if he did it all at once (which is unlikely) editing would take another 2-4 hours and the recording would take 1 hour (thats excluding the possibility of retakes which probably took another hour). The movie itself is 2 and a half hours combine that with the fact that he would probably watch it 2 or 3 more times to make sure he got everything that leaves us with about 20-24 hours of pure hard and tedious work.
@V1p3r Actually yeah, I forgot to add the Movies runtime combine that with him probably watching it a few times to make sure would make it 22-24 hours of work.
I couldn't imagine!
@@mikemarsh3569 this video took 35 hours to make…
Book: Hermione is very sad about Ron's leave and Harry is keep checking whether Ginny is OK.
Movie: HERMIONE AND HARRY ARE DANCING AND NEARLY KISSING AFTER RON'S LEAVE.
Whoever worked on POA would have given us what we wanted. I still remember the first time I saw POA, I realized Ron and Hermione would make a lovely pair as I saw that chemistry spark between them
@@robertappiah8996 Yeah PoA movie was way more partial to Romione. Too bad Kloves changed Ron defending Hermione to him agreeing with Snape. If they hadn’t changed that and have Ron get all his lines back i think even more people would like their relationship.
@@puttrik4865 It was balanced in the first three films and the fifth one, due to Columbus style of being somewhat faithful to the books, and Goldenburg being more appreciative of Ron’s character.
@@scaranvostok3637 yeah i honestly cant understand how they got such incompetent writers and directors for these movies. Obviously Columbus was by far the best one and Goldenburg's style would have worked well for the later ones.
@@puttrik4865 Columbus, Cuaron and Goldenburg were competent…….. others sucked.
People who have only seen the movies: Harry and Hermione should have ended up together.
.
Harry(book version): She's like a sister. I LOVE HER LIKE A SISTER and it's always been like that. I thought y'all knew. Besides, hooking up with Ron sounds better.
.
Hermione(book version): You guys seem to forget that I was the original Harry/Ginny shipper all along.
*THIS* 👆🏻
YES
Nope
You know thats no argument because some people are into their sexy sisters :)
Someone should have told Kloves this...
Movie vs Book after the Locket Horcrux gets destroyed
Movie:
Ron: Only three to go haha
Harry: Fine you can have the girl. Who was Ginny again?
Book: Ron, you are my best friend and my brother and we need you, and she’s hopelessly in love with you and now you can finally understand how much you mean to us and can stop feeling inferior *hugs*
That scene was completely ruined in the movie! Harry is unneccessarily mean and even yells at Ron to destroy the horcrux. And Ron doesn't even apologize for hurting Harry. Whereas in the book Ron is devastated and Harry patiently encourages Ron, by reassuring him that Hermione is like his sister. And the hug showed just how deep their friendship is in the books.
The movies kind of screwed up Harry and Ron's deep friendship almost all the way through
@@breezy3392 All of Harry's relationships with the most important characters in his life in the films are screwed up. Shipped with Hermione (Why?), his dynamic with Ginny completely absent so it makes viewers question why he ended up with her, and his and Ron's Dynamic is butchered.
@@MattGraves01 So it makes kinda sense that movie versions of Harry and Hermione are cheating on their movie ginger spouses.
@@scaranvostok3637 Because we know Hollywood hates gingers.
aww Luna having a mural of her friends is so wholesome
It’s one of the sweetest moments. It shows how much she truly values her friends
@@tenkenrooit’s more like she does that because she never had real friends before them. Otherwise there would be other friends on the mural
Every video: "But Ron actually said this..."
❤️
This is what the movie franchise should actually be called now 😂😂😂
“The book and the film meet up again”
They really went out of their way to do him extremely dirty.
But hermione said this in the movies instead ;>
Hearing Morgan rant about how they did Rons character dirty in the films is oddly satisfying
The worst part of this film, isn’t all the harmione shipping like the comments are acting like, there’s something worse. The film just disrespects the entire book, but not including any of the dumbledore backstory, thats like the main core of the story, that’s what this is about, when you strip away all the amazing set-pieces, you just have a tragic tale of harry’s perception of dumbledore just gone. There’s so much i could go on, but this is whats most important in the story, and that needed to be in the film.
Edit: like im not even a harmione shipper, im a full time romione boi. But this shit just infuriates me, since this is my favorite book.
It's my favorite book too
YES!!!!!!!! That was my biggest issue, the other movies did pretty good about staying with the books, but DUmbledore's backstory WAS the reason everything else happened. I couldn't believe the skipped his funeral as well, I cried when I read it, also they have Harry break the elder wand instead of what he did in the book. I hate the D.H movies because they strayed so far from the book.
Especially how they had to release two parts about it. At that time they could've done so much with it.
Pretty sure the news Moody interrupts from Tonks in the movie was her pregnancy. Not that they had gotten married. As that she says “My HUSBAND the joker.” After Lupins line about Bills injuries.
Yeah
Yeah, because she even holds her belly and looks down.
I just sat down with a bowl full of pasta looking for something to watch and was greeted by this video, uploaded 11 seconds ago. You're just on time, Morgan, thanks!
Enjoy the video and your pasta!
Enjoy your pasta but i dont like pasta
Funny, it’s 11 minutes for me as I read this comment 😂😂
I just ate my late night food 😐
Should've offered to share with... well... Eeeeveryone.
The movie skipped over how Harry becomes obsessed with the Deathly Hallows something which exactly happened to Dumbledore and also how Hermione gets downright scared about the existence of the Hallows, being in constant denial of it. It kind of tells you how despite being so knowledgeable, she can be narrow minded about certain things, not willing to think outside of the logic of the world.
Shows Hermione is human and has flaws AKA not allowed especially in the later films, which sucks so much because it's one of the things that I could relate to her on, maybe not to that extent but I can understand the need for logic
Also I doubt they wanted to put that bit about Harry thinking that the hollows could defeat the horcruxes because then they would have it seem as though someone other than Ron wanted the wand, one of many intentional instances of showing him in a bad light making it seem as though he's power hungry 🙄
@@Heartshapedbox81 it would have been cool to see the Hallows play an actual role in the eventual outcome of the conflict between Harry and Voldemort. It doesn't happen in the books.
@@sreenivaskamath4243 The entire end result is a direct result of one of the hallows though. The only reason why Harry didn't lose to Voldemort at the end was because of the ownership rules of the Elder Wand.
Harry was the wand's true master since he disarmed Draco who had disarmed Dumbledore before he was killed by Snape
If Voldemort had killed(or even disarmed) Malfoy at any point before Harry had disarmed him he would have been the true master of the wand and would have easily won the Battle of Hogwarts
When Bellatrix tortures Hermione at Malfoy Manor:
Book Ron: HERMIONE! HERMIONE!
Movie Ron: Too mildly concerned as if she were some random girl he met an hour ago.
Audiobook Ron (Stephen Fry version): HEEERRRMMMMIIIOOOOONNNEEEEE! HHHHHEEERRRRRRMMMMIIIIOOOONNNEEEE!
For real, I remember reading that when I was 12 and the scene was intense as hell. Ron seemed like an unhinged liability, as if he was also feeling the pain of what was going on with Hermione, with the added element of not actually knowing what they were doing. In the film he’s like, barely into the situation. I swear, the more I look into it, the more it seems like they absolutely hated Ron’s character and had him in the movies out of obligation, since everything that made us care and the majority of his personality was stripped away.
Part where Dudley and his auntie both showed some type of respect and upset over leaving harry is so well written and so unfortunate how it never made the movie.. the fact they both realise shits about to hit the fan and Harry was in danger. like having an annoying little brother you think nothing will ever happen to.. then suddenly he's grown up and gone to fight in a war.. so sad, so beautiful.. makes you feel every tiny bit of they're emotion.
Nah man. Dudley yes, but aunt?? Hell no. She couldn’t bring herself to say anything to him except the word bye. She cried her eyes out over Dudley in that scene meanwhile Harry is the one in mortal danger and she doesn’t do anything to make up for the years of abuse
Bellatrix torchering Hermione (Rons love!!)
Ron in Books : Losing it ; despredly trying to save / help her
Ron in the movie : Calm and like "I guess we should do something"
*Torturing, *Desperately
LOL
@@dibblidyy to be fair torchering someone sounds like a horrible form of torture
@@dibblidyy it is ablest to correct people’s spelling and grammar. They may be dyslexic or not have the access to a full education. What are you getting out of trying to make someone feel stupid? Fair game if it is a troll, but this is just a comment.
@@natalierathbone4349 He simply corrected him, didn’t mock or disrespect him. Calm down.
I didn’t realize how much they were trying to push Harry and Hermoine, I can see now that your right.
I guess it’s reasonable that you wouldn’t notice that, since there’s the fact you told your girlfriend you didn’t like sand as a pick up line which somehow worked.
@@DoggyGuy Sheer luck my friend
@@irishkingarsenal6268 Not luck. You also told her you murdered hundreds of sand people and she still fell for you. Pretty sure you’re wife is a psychopath.
@@DoggyGuy Lucky Me I suppose
You can now truly see through the lies of the Jedi
This is the perfect timing I am lying sick in bed and just looked for something to watch before going to sleep. Thanks a lot for all your great videos :)
Thanks for watching! Feel better!
@@MovieFlame wow thanks a lot!
Oh, I'm sick too
@@taylorfusher2997 *Hermione
The film also cut out Hermione attempting to repair Harry's wand and reminding him that Ron's wand was never the same after it got broken, which was the first time that either of them had said Ron's name since he walked out on them and that was when he heard it through the Deluminator
MovieFlame has to be one of my favourite youtubers, he’s such a down to earth guy and is super genuine. I love all his videos and his whole presentation is incredible, seems like an awesome dude who’d be even cooler to hang out with
Thank you I really appreciate that!
@@MovieFlame holy shit I really didn’t expect that at all, again proving my point that your genuine and care about your viewers. I’m ecstatic that you read, and acknowledged my comment means so much
@@MovieFlame Morgan when you make the video on the topic why you think Ron is the best of the golden trio?
You making these videos is making it easier to read the books, for scenes not shown in the movies it’s easier to picture them when you describe them to us! Thank you for the amazing work as always!
I also think it's a terrible change in the films that the polyjuice potion still keeps your voice, especially with it being contradicted in the Goblet of Fire film.
I know
There was no reason for them to do that
@@meghnagoel6766 Except maybe not wishing to confuse the viewer as to who the characters actually were?
Goblet of fire contradicts chamber of secrets though, cause they talk about how they sound like themselves when they are Crabbe and Goyle
@@elicorry-wright5364 that’s only in the movie not the book 📖
Pret sure that just a visual media thing so the audience can keep track on who's who
Fun fact for any who didn’t know already, the actor for bill, is the son of the actor for mad eye, so his character says that his dad’s character is dead
I thought it was nephew not son
@@mubzytv nope it's father & son :)
*_And he destroyed 5 planets in another universe._*
@@TRBCL and then got a bit wasted in the 9th film
I read the books but didn't see the movies until last year. But when I talk about harry and hermione with my friends they always tell that they like their chemistry. But I was so confused after hearing that as in the books they are like siblings and best friends. Then last year I saw the movies and understood their points. But I love the fact that the books told us that a boy and a girl can be "only" friends.
idk, personally, even before the latter movies came out and we only had the books to go off of, I always kinda shipped Harry and Hermione. It was fine either way, but they always struck me as a better fit.
@@QuantumAscension1 They are a worse fit imo. Their relationship was purely platonic and they are incompatible personality wise.
@@QuantumAscension1 I disagree about the part of them being a better fit. They aren’t a bad ship, but it’s canon that there is NO physical attraction or passion between them.
Harry’s type is Quidditch players with a dark sense of humour. Hermione isn’t one and he doesn’t find her as fun and laid back as Ron is. Plus, Hermione’s too bossy and nagging of him and sometimes is scared of his temper.
Hermione also was keen on hooking Harry and Ginny up together as she gave the latter dating advice regarding Harry. Harry hates bickering which Hermione desires in a partner. And the only person who consistently does that to her is Ron.
And Harry telling Ron that his feelings for Hermione have always been platonically like that of surrogate brother kills any chance of HHr.
It’s frustrating how the filmmakers ignored all this.
@@QuantumAscension1 shipping non original couple is fine and dandy but what the movie did is basically equal to fanfiction writers trying to paint the original couple as toxic because that's the only way their ship made sense in their fanfic
it's bizarre that they barely touched on Lupin and Tonks' relationship, since Harry’s the freaking godfather of their child, which they also never acknowledge
Dude when my brother watch this movie with me, he was so confused when Harry said, “Lupin, your son-.” My brother asked me (because he knew I read the books) if Lupin had a baby and how did Harry know. All I could say is read the books.
@@tylee2358 well he is now on book 2 so……
@@Capri_00 it's awesome that he started them and that he's on the 2nd one already! I also saw the movies before I read the books and felt confused sometimes. 😄
@@cookiemonster6468 he is on book 3 and he’s reading them when he goes to lunch during work. He says that HBO max should make this a series and I agree. The movies had to skip over so much to keep the main plot going. A series may be hard to do but it could be awesome.
@@Capri_00 that's awesome!
And yes, if they turn Harry Potter into a series, that would be legendary. I've actually talked about the same thing with some of my friends and they all agree that 8 movies weren't enough to cover the whole story. So I'm sure that people would be all over the series if J. K. Rowling asked Warner Bros or another studio to do it.
I loved hedwigs death in the movie… she chose to stay after being set free and protected Harry one last time
But it makes no sense because Hedwig couldn't know that a battle was about to take place or that Harry would be in danger.
Yes. The only good change in the movie. She died saving Harry whereas in the book she died without any purpose.
But then I don't like the movie Harry telling Kingsley Hedwig gave him away.
@@dannyjorde2677 She knows exactly where to find any person Harry tells her to, without any prior knowledge, yet she doesn't know that a battle is taking place when dozens of people on brooms are flying and throwing curses in the sky above her? Owls are far smarter than you might think in the Harry Potter universe.
@@denisucuuu I know they can find any person they want, but it still makes no sense that Hedwig knew there would be a battle. What, was she chilling at The Burrow and then thought "I sense that my master's in danger!". Come on.
so evidently they KNOW how to establish a convincing romance, but they did it for the one pair that was NOT supposed to be a couple. and failed miserably with every canon couple in this series. wow.
"shoelace"
@@digiorno1142 omg don't remind me 😫🤚
@@rose87245 don’t you trust me?!?
It almost would have been better if they had just committed to not following the books for the romances. At least they would have been set up properly. They kind of went for the worst of both worlds, setting up fanfic romances but going with the real romances anyway. Not sure which would have been worse.
@@digiorno1142 whoever wrote that needs to go to azkaban
Definitely dedicates this film to anyone who ship Harry and Hermione from the movies alone and considers her to be omniscient and Ron to be a moron.
The most interesting thing i noticed from the books was Ron's uncanny ability at Divination lol
I always cringe at the "let's stay here Harry and grow old" line. That was an awful Harry/Hermione pandering from the writers.
That line was so weird and something Hermione would never say. They only added that line in to pander towards Harry and Hermione shippers.
ikr... i was like wtf hell did you say that hermione...🤦🤦🏻♂️
trust me, i started with watching the movies and i really hoped harry and hermione would end up together, i was bit disappointed when hermione ended up with dull ron...
then, i read the books and i understand why that scene was like fuking stupid and awkward... oh and i was originally hoping harry would end up with cho and then ginny suddenly became relevant... and i was shipping harry and luna cuz they always spend time together.... but weird ginny became harry's love interest..
so in conclusion, read the book first and immediately watch the movie of the respective book (so you know which character is which)
@@wilsonxavier8276 Yeah, that’s the films have a divided fanbase. Movie watchers end up being confused and book purists angry.
To be fair, it did a solid job at conveying the feelings of hopelessness and wanting to give up that the book showed.
@@sastryvnk4402 They could have done that without trying to imply romantic undertones which was never there in the book.
13:04 this always bugged me about the picture frames - even if Hermione’s parents’ memories had been wiped or changed, the events within the photos would STILL have happened so Hermione shouldn’t have disappeared from them (unless Hermione removed her image from the photos using magic too) but unless that’s confirmed, it’s still an error!
The picture frame thing was just the movie version of confirming she's out of her parent's life now, I think it was a really well done scene and preferred it a lot more to the version Hermione gives of this in the book. But then again there are some things that just work better in movies than in books and vice versa.
@@luciamusic3821 I agree other wise the parents would be like who is this girl I’m photos
@@LE-zy2od yeah if feath eaters had a lead in some way on who her parents were, and they went to them the pictures would've just confirmed it.
Either way in the books she never obliviates them rather alters their memory. She finds them and changes the memories back. She never permanently erases their memories like in the movies as she loves her parents too much to do this
I think the concept of Harry leaving Hedwig to the wild was a better idea than in the book since it shows Harry's selflessness and it makes more sense than a common spell
You know he died
Wait what? He was leaving Hedwig to the wild? My interpretation is that he was allowing Hedwig to fly with them so she'd be one less thing to carry on the bike. I do prefer Hedwig sacrificing herself for Harry to just dying in her cage though.
I thought hedwig was going to the burrow ahead of them
Hedwig dies in both the movie and the book to represent Harry's innocence dying
What are you talking about? The fact that Harry leaves Hedwig to the wild in the movie only shows sheer irresponsibility, as the Death Eaters know exactly what Harry's owl looks like. That's why in the previous books they couldn't risk using Hedwig to send messages, because she would be in danger of being attacked. The most logical and natural thing is to have your pet with you at all times so you can protect it.
I hate how they always butcher Ron’s character! This is a great video Morgan. Looking forward to the final part of this amazing series!!!
Same here. They fucked up his entire arc. 😒
Apparently he's gonna put out a video talking about why for him Ron is the best in the Trio, looking forward to that as well!
@@stefan4159 I’m excited too!!!!
Great breakdown.
The one miss was Mr. Wesley's reaction to the attempt at being questioned on the Harry Potter escort from the Dursley's.Nothing and no one was going to keep him from checking on George It's one of the few times you understand that Mr. Weasley was a very protective dad and a person you could not intimidate or force no matter the circumstances, even by friends.
Sadly, BOTH times.. it's cut from the film.
28:42 Agreed. In the book there were loads of examples of Ron comforting Hermione and standing with her either in the Burrow or Grimmauld Place even against Harry's occasional snaps. and later on when they were locked in the manor, Ron went ape shit crazy as Hermione was tortured upstairs and Harry was urging him to be quiet. Non of that happened in the film.
To the film's credit, they tried to hint such examples, but you can't portray Ron and Hermione close together and Harry isolated as they were talking behind him and stop when he is around, and Harry even confronted them before Ron's departure - was mentioned in the screenplay, but not in the film - and portray Ron being jealous that Harry and Hermione being close as they are.
You can't do these two things together as bland as it was in the film. It's been said numerous times that the films did Ron bad and this series is a good testimony to that.
Also Ron after Hermione treated his wound in the tent, his first thought was his concern about The Cattermoles and the muggle borns that they helped escape and he rejoiced when he found that they obtained the locket, and he - along with the others - had a good mood occasionally when there was good food around and not a constant grump like the films did.
When Voldemort interrogates Grindelwald about the Elder Wand:
Book Grindelwald: GTFO I rather die than tell you everything *gets murdered*
Movie Grindelwald: Oh hi Tom let me spill everything graciously *gets spared*
Harry and Hermionie when ron leave in the books: Confused, depressed, sad, hungry, on the edge of giving up, on the edge to cry, on the edge to die
Harry and hermionie in the movies when Ron leaves: Haha romance lol
'Confused, depressed, sad, hungry, on the edge of giving up, on the edge to cry, on the edge to die' Lol that's literally what they showed in the movie, but some people who are bad at human relations take it as romance. Hermione touched Harry? OMFG THEY ARE HAVING ROMANCE
@@fngrlss7923 They danced together, they almost kiss. Idk if you've ever been close like that to someone but when someone dances with you and then looks into your eyes, they want to kiss you
@@CorporealNatural1 And then of course Hermione makes that comment about just staying in the Forest of Dean and growing old together.
Novel: Hermione's like a sister to me, thought you knew??
Movie: "CHILDREN, LIFT UP YOUR VOOOICE REJOOOOICE!!!💃🕺"
Changing the death of Wormtail in the movie was a huge mistake. In the third book we see Harry saying to Dumbledore that it's his fault that Voldemort will come back because he didn't let Sirius and Lupin kill Wormtail. Then Dumbledore tells him that it will come a day when he will be glad that he saved Wormtails life, because when a wizard saves another wizard a bond between them is formed and Wormtail will be in Harry's debt. So Wormtail failed to kill him and the hand that his master gave him chockes him as a punishment to his betrayal.
I agree. And this is why the books are better than the movies. There are a few things in the movies that I like than in the book, but these were mostly in the first three movies. The latter ones not so much.
A super small detail that wasn’t in the movie, Harry’s polyjuice potion was golden and smelled/tasted really good, it’s a cool distinction that shows Harry’s good spirit in comparison to crabbe and goyle
R.A.B. our unsung hero & Cloves the actual antagonist of this series.
I need a count of every time in this series when he says:
"The movie cuts from this scene to this scene, but there's a lot that happens in between these two scenes in the book."
I counted 6 in this video. I may have miscounted though, and/or didn’t count variations of how he said it
Is it possible to count?
Umm, infinity is not a real number
Ironically harry freeing the muggleborns from the ministry is a mission in the videogame.
I had totally forgotten that scene, and after re-reading Deathly Hallows I'm bitterly disappointed it's not in the movie. It once again shows Harry's quick-thinking and would have been such a great scene!
The Video games had a few instances where they used book Elements. Like even Peeves was in some of them
In the movies, ginny is barley in them, you could remove her from script and nothing would change.
Well except for chamber of secrets but you get the idea.
You're not serious about removing Ginny,are you?
If you are then go pick up the books and read them carefully instead of skimming through them
You are not serious about removing Ginny, are you? Because if you are then stop watching the movies and pick up the books and read them carefully instead of skimming through them
@@Anonymous-gf5gl
Ginny is harry’s love interest and they end up together, in the movies they don’t even talk to each other. She has literally zero character development and barley relevant to the plot of the movies (again except for chamber of secrets).
So yeah, I am serious.
@@Anonymous-gf5gl She meant Movie Ginny. And I would add Movie Ron too. The films should have killed Ron and Ginny off. It would have prevented the anguish of watching these two massacred……..🤣
@@Anonymous-gf5gl can you not read or something?
The enormous effort you put into these videos is impossible not to notice. Your passion for what you do and for the source material is on full display. I look forward to these videos unlike any other YT content. Excellent work dude.
YES!! Thank you!! 😃 She MODIFIED her parents' memory, NOT Oblivate!! THAT scene ALWAYS bothers me in the movie!! Especially since she DOESN'T Oblivate the muggle girl in the diner later!! 😠😠
6:55 I liked Harry's comment on Duddly's unexpected demeanor "Blimey, Dudley, did the dementors blow a different personality into you?" :"D
Also when he was arguing with Vernon about the importance of them leaving, it shows how their morphed relation from the first time they were introduced to the final time they were together, and although Harry didn't have any good memories in the house, he reflected upon his time there. One of the few things that the film got right. Few.
I blame the directors, they shipped Harry and Hermione so much when it was obvious in the sixth book that Harry and Ginny were going to end up together and Ron and Hermione since the 4th and 6th. What did they think J.K Rowling was gonna change her mind for book 7 or something? 🤦
She did
@@DLR1997 How?
@@gtd5626 it was noted that she had second thoughts about it after she made it.
@@DLR1997 Really, well dang. But still the movie is based off the book, it was already published so she couldn't change it if she wanted to unless J.K. does a test on and say after 30 years they divorced.
@@gtd5626 lol you're right
It's finally out! We appreciate the hard work and effort you put on these videos Morgan :)
Alternative title: Morgan destroying the Harry/Hermione ship 😂
Yeah his a king for that
Having Harry reading the articles in the movie would probably bore the audience to death, so, I can see why they skimmed around them. But, cutting out crucial moments like Dudley saying goodbye to Harry, the Tonks house, and Lupin's subplot, were truly missed opportunities.
Hello fellow build
9:10 I can get behind that change, because in the book he use it against Stanley Shunpike who was under their magic unwillingly, so Harry didn't want to hurt him, which lead later to his argument with Lupin when he criticised such move. But since Stanley wasn't in the film, it made sense to have Hedwig being the give away clue and adds depth to her final act with Harry.
41:42 A side of Hermione that wasn't emphasized if never addressed in the film. It doesn't take anything from her brilliance, but Kloves gotta Kloves.
It's amazing how much development Dudley of all people got throughout this series, despite not being active in the majority of it. And it's a shame that they cut it from the final version of the film.
Your series is great at reminding me how much they really took away from the other characters in the book.
The movies literally ruined Ron and ginny's character. Although for me, the harry potter books will always be superior to the harry potter films. But you cannot deny the fact that the harry potter films are the best book-to-movie adaptations. They just give you that nostalgia everything you watch them. I would personally love to watch an 8 hour long harry potter movie but lets just talk sense. And after watching the films, while re reading the books again (after countless re reads already) I see (in my mind's eye) the magical world which harry potter movies created. I in my imagination think of Daniel as harry, Rupert as ron, Emma as Hermione and all others in their respective characters. There can't be any other actors who could have done that.
But the major problem with the films is the character of ron and ginny. Otherwise, I loved the movies. If these two (Ron and ginny) were portrayed the way they were originally written, it would have been such a flawless representation of the books. And its nothing to do with the actors. I cannot imagine anyone else playing the roles but its just the way these characters have shown completely opposite personality traits (which is the most problematic thing with the films). Ron was a bit jealous of harry in the books too but was never a complete a*s hole. Ron always stood up for Hermione and harry. When snape called Hermione an insufferable know it all, Ron was the one who stood up against snape and told him off while the movie ron was enjoying it and said that snape is right. Ginny was so confident, independent, charming, beautiful and mature in the books. She barely cried when harry told her that they can't be together anymore. She told him that she knew this was coming and was actually supportive. But the film ginny was just obsessed with harry and she was always crying and was not herself. It made people think that she might have given harry a love potion. They actually made it look like that Harry and Hermione were supposed to be together and are the perfect match for each other and that's why people who've only seen the films feel like that too.
I don't. But besides that, that's actually one of the issues, she wasn't ever crying. you said she was always crying and I realize what you mean with her not being herself but Ginny's literally never crying, not on any of the parts where she was supposed to be, not at the start when she's half laughing and half crying because she's sad seeing her brother's go and she can't come with, not when she wakes back up in the chamber after almost dying seeing a giant snake dead, they erased her from the scene going back into the castle (but I guess I shouldn't be surprised by that they did the same thing with Ron when he was in the hospital Wing inside the Half-Blood Prince AKA none of his family came to see him as they were supposed to) they skip Dumbledore's funeral so we can't go on that but she wasn't crying with everyone else in that scene either and last but certainly not least she was not crying when her own damn brother died! Whom she was close to, but you would never guess that by the movies, so no. they didn't have her being a crying mess because at least then that would have been a way for the audience to connect to her but instead they went the completely opposite route and seem to have instructed her to show no damn emotions! so that way the audience won't connect to her, you know who was crying all the time though?...
38:30-38:56 I one hundred percent agree. The movies should have taken that route.
"In the book there was nothing to see." THANK YOU! The movie making it seem like Harry and Hermoine could be a couple always bothered me. I am curious if the movie's change on that is why the author said her comments about Harmony having a chance if she were to rewrite it. Perhaps she is wrong about the movie influencing her. If that is the case I am glad she finished writing before the movies showed their take on Ron's Harmony jealousy. Book-wise there would have to be a lot re-written to even make Harry and Harmoine actually like each other that way as neither character ever thinks about the other in such a way.
The Harry and Hermoine dance moment is the worst moment in the whole of the HP universe canon or non-canon. The real problem with it is nothing leads up to it other than what the people involved with the movies wanted and Ron's jealousy and the crew wanting/needing drama between the trio. All of this doesn't just ignore book relationships, but also ignores setup movie relationships. Harry has been dating Ginny and doesn't break up to protect her, as in the book.
@Unoriginal Name (-_- ) But I won’t want current Rowling to be involved in the production, she should just be a consultant. Who knows if the next remake allows Rowling more credit, she may retcon half of her stuff to something worse than Rowling.
Only a pair of faithful hardcore book elistists should produce the remakes……..
@@scaranvostok3637 It’s her book and what exactly is she doing? Everyone makes her sound like Voldemort that she’s so hateful but the reality is I don’t think she is exactly what everyone’s making her out to be I think she is a strong advocate against children being medicalized and I think she’s always been that way especially with like mood stabilizers and things like that I don’t think she’s this hateful person I think her main issue is just against children being medicalized unfortunately with the extremism in all politics even a slight disagreement gets you labeled as hateful and the people being hateful to her Are horrifically extreme and I never see examples as to why they’re treating her this way.
@@Maverick4267 Dude, look at what Rowling has done since 2007. She’s been adding weird stuff in interviews and stuff about saying Dumbledore is gay, Ron and Hermione have a doubtful marriage, Werewolves are like AIDS inflicted people and making the FF movies which partially retcons canon. The worst thing she did to pull the straw was claim Cursed Child as canon, which is such an insult to the original novels much like Disney is to Star Wars.
Tbh, Rowling lately hasn’t been doing anything good to HPverse and it’s better that she wouldn’t retcon canon again.
@@scaranvostok3637 So what? It's still HER creation! Those are her charaters, it is her world! She can change and add what ever she likes! Why dose a canon have to be something unchangeable forever? People do change. Their ideas can change too over time and influence their point of view on their creation.
The best part of this video is seeing Morgan actually trashing Steve Kloves. This was the first time in this series that he explicitly mentioned his name, and it was really fun to watch. It's like going from You-Know-Who to Voldemort.
"There's a lot that happens between these two scenes"
I felt that. Every time.
This mini series has taught me that literally any one who has an "eye description" will have it removed from the films.
Rufus Scrimgeour went from yellow to brown
Xenophilius went from cross eyes to not
Mundungus went from bloodshot to not
Voldemort went from red to white/pale blue?
Hell. Even Harry went from Green to Blue.
EVEN LILY WENT FROM GREEN TO BROWN
It’s almost as if they have to cast real people based on whether they can act rather than what colour their eyes are.
Harry Potter couldn't have the eyes because he was allergic to thegreen contacts
@@intergalactic92 yeah but the lily scenes could’ve at least done some minor cgi
Mom: “Darling, can I give away your Harry Potter books?”
Me: “...”
Her: “You still like them? After all this time?”
Me: “Always.”
This and the last comparison video for Half Blood Prince felt more like Steve Kloves bashing videos and quite rightly so. I wish Goldenberg who screenwrote Order of the Phoenix did the screenwriting for the rest of the series.
Steve Kloves sucks. I wish he never was a part of the movies.
Yeah, I wasnt a fan of the fifth one but I respected it as the book was incredibly long and had so many small and connected details that they would never be able to do everything so they focused on the important stuff.
I actually hated how order of the Phoenix went it made me so mad but true golden berg is better than 🧄 cloves
Small Detail: In the book they actually didnt go straight to the woods, Hermione brought them back to Grimmauld Place but Yaxley caught her hand just before they vanished and the protection spell was broken so they then moved to the woods.
It was very very brief in the film. Freeze frame at the right second and you'll see the grimmauld place door where they lose yaxley. Then they apparate to the trees.
Hermione says that
Hermione mentions it in the film when Ron was splinched
“There’s a lot that happens between these two scenes”
10:38
11:46
14:02
15:36
18:47
22:24
37:54
41:25
Let me know if I missed any
27:30
Writers: What should we have Hermione doing?
Person 1: Dancing with Harry?
Person 2: With Krum (deleted scene)?
Me: How about dancing with Ron just like in the BOOK.
Writers(angry): …
Me: (gets yeeted out of the first floor)
Gonna be a higher floor mate 😂😂😂😂
So much of Dumbledore and Grindelwald was cut out of the movie. And now with the FB movies they're trying to bring it but there's one thing I didn't like.
In the books, Dumbledore tells harry that he didn't face Grindelwald because he was afraid of knowing the truth about which wand killed his sister. Making him a human with flaws and fears unlike the perfect person we knew while he was alive.
But in the second FB movie it says that he cannot face him because some blood pact. And that's cool I guess but for me takes away the humanization of Dumbledore in the book.
But we also see Dumbledore's pain and regret. Also in the book he DID face him because there was this epic duel beween them but in order to do so he had to destroy the blood pact first. Besides just because there is a blood pact that physically keeps him from fighting it dosn't mean he is also scared to face him because he didn't want to learn the truth about Ariana.
The movie also never addresses why Harry’s wand moved on its own.
Great vids. The main takeaway for me is that they seem to have given most of Ron's good moments to Hermione and several of Hermione's good moments to Harry.
Wormtail doesn't choke himself intentionally. His hand is actually cursed to choke him on any act of betrayal by voldemort himself
I think a lot of people dismiss the attempt a romance between hermoine and harry in the movies because the books instill in us that they have no romantic feeling toward each other. But the movies seem to NEVER actually address this except once in the 6th movie when harry dismisses dumbledore's remark (which was also such a weird interaction). I also quite disliked how Dumbledore in general was portrayed in the 6th movie, he was almost whimsical and it was very different to the way he had been in past movies... Loads of strange choices throughout the series.
Also in Yule Ball, they make Harry and Hermione a lot touchy with each other than they were in the books. They make Harry’s reaction to Hermione’s glow up make like mesmerised instead of platonic.
I really loved the Hedwig protecting Harry scene. It made me cry so much. It shows the super strong bond between Harry and Hedwig's relationship.
I've enjoyed this series so much
I’m so sad that this series is almost over! I love it so much
"After awhile, Harry found himself 'taking it out' to stare at Ginny's name in the girls dormitory"
This is the biggest difference between the book, and the book vs movie videos!! Naughty Harry!😅😅 Love the videos in all seriousness
It's just a dot on the map. It's like looking at your crush on Google maps (assuming she's pinned her location or something)
Whenever I see one of these videos I just have such a feeling to binge watch the whole lot, so I do.
Honestly these take so much time and effort, at the end we have a perfect one for each movie. Well done Morgan!
Its interesting how when things from the book aren't in the films due to "save time" but theres so many instances of "this never happened in the book." What happens if you replace all the "never happened in the book" with the key parts that did happen, how much time was actually "saved"
07:01 It was in a deleted scene as well that we see a side of Petunia never shown before when she said "You didn’t just lose a mother that night in Godric’s Hollow, you know. I lost a sister."
It parallels the situation in the book "She stopped and looked back. For a moment Harry had the strangest feeling that she wanted to say something to him; She gave him an odd, tremulous look and seemed to teeter on the edge of speech, but then, with a little of her head, she hustled out of the room after he husband and son." It might have been not the best way to relay such situation, but it is close enough to it.
When I recorded the deathly hallows part 1 on my tv i saw this scene
I’m glad it as deleted cause the movies had no reasons for her to say this
I am surprised you didn't mention how badass harry was when he said "one mustn't tell lies"
as it in the books
*was
@@SabaKhan-zp5of he said it wasn't in the books
Because it wasn't in the book
Honestly the whole idea of the filmmakers deciding to do the Godric Hollow without the Polyjuice Potion completely baffles me, Harry is the most wanted wizard at the moment, and any slip-up could lead Voldemort to him. There's a reason why Hermione was so advocating for using the poly juice potion and then also using the invisibility cloak along with covering their tracks. It just made sense
Now, we can take shots every time Morgan says, "This is where the book and the film meet up again."
17:45 I really think that's a sweet moment in the movies where Harry tries to save Ginny. I'm critical of the movies, but this scene in the movies is something I'd gladly prefer being canon (in the books).
" And the book and movie meet up again when " a iconic phase
New drinking game!
Welcome to part 7 of MovieFlames's "There's a lot that happens between this 2 scenes" drinking game. How are you guys doing?
Edit: Also the filmmaker's treatment of Ron is just unacceptable. Their fan fiction of wanting Harry/Herminone to be a couple really does nothing but hurt his character. This is probably why Ginny's character was butchered in HBP. They wanted Herminone to be with Harry so badly that they didn't care to make Ginny or her relationship with Harry interesting. Also Charlie doesn't appear, they cut Bill and Fleur's relationship, Percy's ark was cut, and Fred's death was offscene. The Welsley's really got shafted in the films.
And they were the first wizarding family Harry met since the night his parents were killed. They treated him as if he were one of them. Such injustice.
Really appreciate hardwork you put in these videos watch, reading movies and books again and again going through extra info, and facts is not easy thank you for this entertainment 💛💛💛💛💛
I wish they didn't show Grindelwald selling Dumbledore out, coz that scene in the book showed despite whatever happened, Grindelwald still had some feelings for his old friend, it also made me wonder after reading that scene that maybe Rita was right and Grindelwald just gave up fighting Dumbledore in the end 🤔
The part where Hermione used the spell to reveal everyone in Black's house and was unfunctionable with Kreacher, I thought the elfs were undetectable and went away with it. 😂
Yeah, the spell was specifically to detect humans. Kreacher is an elf.
As this series is coming to an end I just wanna say thanks for putting all this together! I bet it took a ridiculous amount of time & effort.
Great job man! What a great & insightful series
At the Malfoy's manor Voldemort yelled at Wormtail about keeping their guest quiet, and it was described as "with no change in his quiet thoughtful tone" in the book. It kinda startled me when I saw the film the first time as I wasn't expecting it :"D
These dissections give me life! I rarely watch the movies because of how much they changed even though I listen to the books on audible all the time. Don’t love how they changed it so much. Thank you for these & your honest opinions on what they changed!
Having Hedwig die trying to protect Harry rather than having her get hit with a curse inside her cage is actually a pretty good change that I prefer in the movie over the book. Hedwig showing her loyalty to Harry trying to protect him is such a sweet moment that I absolutely love
There was also the fact that Voldemort being able to fly was considered a huge deal in the book.
Morgan: the filmmakers are trying to make us hate Ron
Me: well it didn't work because he's still my favorite character out of the golden trio
13:50 Hermione didn't say basilisk venom is the only surefire way to destroy a horcrux. She says it's one of the surefire ways
She refused to list Fiend Fire, because of the extreme danger involved. So, you are right. 😊
I remember this very well, as I also had to explain it to a friend.
She said it has to be something so destructive, that the horcrux wouldn't be able to recover. She also added that there are very few things as lethal as basilisk venom, and that they're too dangerous to carry along. I think that last part fits fiendfire very well, since it's the main cause of Crabbe's death.
@@rustydaboyrobot there are a few other things too I think. But the only ones mentioned to be capable of destroying a horcrux are the venom and fiendfyre
@@eyob.t1389 Hermione hinted that there are more. See my previous comment.
** The fact that the only person Harry hugged longingly
in the series is Ron tells you what
Ronald Weasley means to Harry**
just a little note for every person who doubts that Ron is the closest to Harry.
Yessss!
True. I always thought ron felt like Harry was his twin brother, like he saw the closeness between his brothers Fred and george
@@stilscarlott
I've always seen their bond the same as James and Sirius but not like everyone thinks.
Harry does not represent his father, but rather resembles the life of his godfather
Harry = Sirius
Harry mirrors a troubled Sirius, the fugitive from his abusive family, and a friend with a complicated temper
. Ron = James
Ron and his family echo James when he greets Sirius at his home
The two are looking for fame and attention and are more clowning than their best friend
Ron even was the one thing Harry Potter would miss the most.
while i definitely agree with Morgan on hating the movie trying to make Harry & Hermione a couple, what i hated most about the DH1 film was Grindelwald's final redemption. in the book his exact line was "that wand will never, ever be yours, Voldemort", but the film just had him out who (he thought) currently owned the wand which i do not understand one bit and which drives me beyond insane at the screenwriters!
“On the heavier side” gets me every time time😂