No Name I learn one subset at a time (like the 6 sune algorithms for example), practice them throughout the day, and keep learning a set every day or two, making sure you also remember the other ones. You can learn slower if you want but I do recommend the 1 subset at a time thing.
That's a pretty big range still so I'd say stick with what you have for a little while and work on that and some AUF. I don't really recommend EG2 until you're mid or low 2 seconds at least
What 2x2 do you recommend? I don't mean the fastest one but something that is safe to use at competition. My weipo is good but while shaking hands I get times like 5 seconds :( while I average 2.5 knowing EG1
I added springs from the MGC to both of my valks. There’s also some of the slower angstrom lube, whatever that’s called, and then I just add silk when it’s dry. Probably had something on the core, idk what
You should master each method you learn (not only for 2x2) before you look into something more advanced. Probably you should be able to predict the auf and master your recognition before learning more advanced methods
@@pinkbeast4371 Yes that would work, however in many cases, it’s faster to have a separate algorithm. Executing lefty algorithms can be slower, and you might have trouble mirroring difficult cases
Planet Cubed you should probably stick with that for a bit longer. Focus on one looking more now, as well as finding food faces/solutions. You can learn a few eg2s but I don’t recommend learning the whole set yet
i use only the lbl (layer by layer) method and i average around 7-8 secs. what would you recommend to learn next and improve most? I also have a pb single of 1.52 secs.
the long term most optimal progression would be to learn and practice ortega until you average around sub 5 (which could take a while :(), and after that learn cll, followed by EG-1, etc, ie. the order of set in this video there are people that average sub 4 consistently with ortega, so if you arent too serious about 2x2, stick with that, or even learn all 42 cll algs, its not that bad tbh good luck!
Learn Ortega, and practice it until you get to like sub 6 or so. Then learn CLL, and practice it till you’re like sub 4 with good consistency. After that, learn EG-1, and Anti CLL or EG-2.
With those algs alone it's very possible to be sub-4, just be efficient, with Varasano always see OLL in inspection (which isn't hard), for CLL recognize quickly and don't use trash algs. Fast TPS is going to help you, but you don't need anything insane
I cant find anything else like this but there's 6 different v shapes you can make for LS. CLL (What you talk about), EG-2, EG-1 Bar on Left, EG-1 Right, Opposite Colors Left, Opposite Right. I think thats like 750~ algs since there's 18 CLL sized sets. It seems very worthwhile into looking into since making a V is extremely easy, never more than 4 I suspect. Im too stupid to figure out some software or math but I've done a ton of scrambles just making the V and it never takes more than 3. Additionally the TCLL and all of EG would be very useful getting close to 1000 algs. Very insane numbers but there's people with at least 1600 and 4000 algs online so it not too insane.
Or 2400 if you want to include the middle corner of the v being twisted. And then 4400 for the other pieces on top of that, and then whatever after that. Has potential to be a very fast 1LLL type method but idk if it would be worth it. It could be like learning full OLS, when you could just learn 1LLL if you could memorize 17,000+ algs.
When I learned CLL, my times barely improved since I wasn’t one looking, but it was worth it because it opened the gates for eg-1, which opened the gates for one looking, which really really dropped my times. But if you average low 3, then I’m guessing your basically one looking your solves, so I think cll would be a good idea.
@@user-he1xq5rt4v i dont one look but i get sub 3 ortega averages regularly one look is so hard i have my official 2.51 average on my channel im working on cll now and the recognization *is* proving to be difficult
Thanks for your answer! I am thinking about learning LS. I just want to know if it is better than EG method. Like movecount, recognition... I don't care about number of algorithms).
@@anze0 EG is best to know first. One looking is easy and the lower number of algs makes it quick to pick up. LS is less developed, there are a lot of very short algorithms, more than CLL, but still some bad ones. It is meant to be a supplement to EG, so id learn that first
![[UA] Eternal Fire проти NAVI | EPL Season 20 Malta](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/chvlsDygrZM/mqdefault.jpg)
Any tips on learning the algs and how many algs you should learn regularly (maybe every 3 days)?
No Name I learn one subset at a time (like the 6 sune algorithms for example), practice them throughout the day, and keep learning a set every day or two, making sure you also remember the other ones. You can learn slower if you want but I do recommend the 1 subset at a time thing.
Will Callan Oh okay thanks, and when you say learn a set every day or two, do you mean one algorithm in a subset?
No Name I mean 1 subset (6 algs) it helps you learn to recognize, remember, and train them better when you learn them together like that.
Will Callan got it 👍🏽
3:09 leg 1 lol
I see u have a mgc that is orange
I have the red btw
orange like darkness's panties
Question, on your spreadsheet is the first alg on the list for the case the one that u use?
I average low 2s-3.4 with CLL, and EG 1 method, should i proceed learning EG 2? or finish first full AUF on CLL and AUF on EG1?
That's a pretty big range still so I'd say stick with what you have for a little while and work on that and some AUF. I don't really recommend EG2 until you're mid or low 2 seconds at least
Rami’s favorite stickerless black
What 2x2 do you recommend?
I don't mean the fastest one but something that is safe to use at competition. My weipo is good but while shaking hands I get times like 5 seconds :( while I average 2.5 knowing EG1
Kacper Rafalski i like the Valk over the weipo, but it can sometimes be hard to set up
@@willcallan942 how did you personally set up yours ? Not the Ångström one, one you personally set up
I added springs from the MGC to both of my valks. There’s also some of the slower angstrom lube, whatever that’s called, and then I just add silk when it’s dry. Probably had something on the core, idk what
@@willcallan942 thanks !
@@willcallan942 have you tried valk2 LM?
Where my boy Ortega at
in the trash can
He changed name in 2015
@Velocity people get 0 to 1 second averages with EG+LS+TCLL
E
Do you know TEG-2????
How far do you think one can get with just EG1 and CLL (with and without one looking)
Currently averaging 2.8 with CLL.
Sub 1.6
Maybe further
WR lmao. Yiheng for example
LOL 2x2
Lol stacking cups
@@sportstv._. in English please
@@ThibaudOU no, i From Ukraine
LOL non cuber
I recently learnt the full cll..
Should I proceed by learning eg-1 or get better at auf
You should master each method you learn (not only for 2x2) before you look into something more advanced. Probably you should be able to predict the auf and master your recognition before learning more advanced methods
Both
Can I ask you something about TCLL?
sure!
@@willcallan942 So could I just use mirrored TCLL+ algorithms for TCLL-?
@@pinkbeast4371 Yes that would work, however in many cases, it’s faster to have a separate algorithm. Executing lefty algorithms can be slower, and you might have trouble mirroring difficult cases
@@willcallan942 Ok, Thank you.
One looking Tip pls
I had your mom as a teacher she's really nice
lol what
... is this a joke?
I know cll, eg1, and anti cll. I average like 3-2.8ish what should I do/learn next?
Planet Cubed you should probably stick with that for a bit longer. Focus on one looking more now, as well as finding food faces/solutions. You can learn a few eg2s but I don’t recommend learning the whole set yet
i use only the lbl (layer by layer) method and i average around 7-8 secs. what would you recommend to learn next and improve most? I also have a pb single of 1.52 secs.
the long term most optimal progression would be to learn and practice ortega until you average around sub 5 (which could take a while :(), and after that learn cll, followed by EG-1, etc, ie. the order of set in this video
there are people that average sub 4 consistently with ortega, so if you arent too serious about 2x2, stick with that, or even learn all 42 cll algs, its not that bad tbh
good luck!
Learn Ortega, and practice it until you get to like sub 6 or so. Then learn CLL, and practice it till you’re like sub 4 with good consistency. After that, learn EG-1, and Anti CLL or EG-2.
@@stepanvalerivich6999 what about guimond intermediate? People said it was faster than ortega
Too many algs, I’m sticking with Ortega and Cll and not being sub 4
With those algs alone it's very possible to be sub-4, just be efficient, with Varasano always see OLL in inspection (which isn't hard), for CLL recognize quickly and don't use trash algs. Fast TPS is going to help you, but you don't need anything insane
Harsha Paladugu I’m sub 4 with LBL and Ortega LOL
F U!!!
I mean sub 3 w/Varasano and LBL is easy lol
TheAlgWizard 2x2 is just too annoying to practice
Whats the advantage of tcll???
You have more freedom when building layers
for example there are scrambles with a tcll layer made and is not fast to orient the 4th piece and do the cll
I only use eg and average sub 1.9, should i learn more methods
Be able to one look 100% of the time, and know full auf. That should get you sub 1.6. Then learn more algs.
@@danielrose-levine9694 ok, thanks!
@@danielrose-levine9694 нр ноги?)
@@sportstv._. вр
@@day1nolean ок
which set you're learning now?
Any advice for one looking?
Dont pause
@@tuckerchamberlain3306i know im 3 years late but i cant tell if this is a joke or
I cant find anything else like this but there's 6 different v shapes you can make for LS. CLL (What you talk about), EG-2, EG-1 Bar on Left, EG-1 Right, Opposite Colors Left, Opposite Right. I think thats like 750~ algs since there's 18 CLL sized sets. It seems very worthwhile into looking into since making a V is extremely easy, never more than 4 I suspect. Im too stupid to figure out some software or math but I've done a ton of scrambles just making the V and it never takes more than 3. Additionally the TCLL and all of EG would be very useful getting close to 1000 algs. Very insane numbers but there's people with at least 1600 and 4000 algs online so it not too insane.
Or 2400 if you want to include the middle corner of the v being twisted. And then 4400 for the other pieces on top of that, and then whatever after that. Has potential to be a very fast 1LLL type method but idk if it would be worth it. It could be like learning full OLS, when you could just learn 1LLL if you could memorize 17,000+ algs.
as a guy who learned ls1-3
516 = 129(tcll)*4 possible places in top layer :D
I average low 3 with ortega, should i learn cll or eg 1
learn cll
@@uCubeYT я ортегой саб 4 низкая
When I learned CLL, my times barely improved since I wasn’t one looking, but it was worth it because it opened the gates for eg-1, which opened the gates for one looking, which really really dropped my times. But if you average low 3, then I’m guessing your basically one looking your solves, so I think cll would be a good idea.
@@user-he1xq5rt4v i dont one look but i get sub 3 ortega averages regularly
one look is so hard
i have my official 2.51 average on my channel
im working on cll now and the recognization *is* proving to be difficult
I average low 4 lol
which algset you're learning now?
CLL I started cubing 3 months ago.
Cool, I started tcll+
Advay Sant same but 8 months later lol
@@joshwilliams5835 ive only learned like 2 and a half sets now lol, cuz motivation
Tbh I’ve only done 2 sets lol
@@joshwilliams5835 ,
‘
What’s LS4-9?
Probably different orientations of the piece that is on the top layer
is the last set WVCP?
Yo
Genius solves
Dude, how do you even remember like 300 algorithms? How is that even possible?!
ez
He knows full LS which by itself is about 600 algs with no mirrors
Is average moves of LS method calculated?
I dont believe so. I did calculate that the odds of a solved V were something like 1 in 20, but it might be useful to get some other data
Thanks for your answer!
I am thinking about learning LS.
I just want to know if it is better than EG method. Like movecount, recognition...
I don't care about number of algorithms).
@@anze0 EG is best to know first. One looking is easy and the lower number of algs makes it quick to pick up. LS is less developed, there are a lot of very short algorithms, more than CLL, but still some bad ones. It is meant to be a supplement to EG, so id learn that first
Recognition is also harder, and requires you know how to recognize CLL and TCLL
Super helpful can’t wait to learn them