I really enjoyed the debate and hope we managed to find a good mix between discussing technical details on the one hand and talking to a general audience of interested people from all back grounds. Feedback and constructive criticism certainly appreciated. Looking forward to continue discussing the shortcoming and limitations of the Lightning Network protocol in the future. Thanks to Bitcoin Magazine for the invitation and for being open to criticism.
For context, I own BTC which I store on a Ledger. However all of my Ordinals trades are funded through newly purchased BTC. Part superstition I guess but I don’t sell my HoDL inventory! 😂
Centralised and cancelable failing transactions does not sound like bitcoin at all, maybe you can read the bitcoin whitepaper, and start using bitcoin cash instead...
@@sang3Etai would argue that not segregating the witnesses would be much more secure than higher hash rates. When have we ever even seen a succesfull 51% attack on BCH?
I’m not worried about the lightning network.There are 2 companies that i trust and I’m confident they are going to figure out lightning probably by the end of this decade.Those 2 companies are based in California and they are:Lightspark and Lightning Labs
after more than haf a decade of work, LN is still so fucked up.
I really enjoyed the debate and hope we managed to find a good mix between discussing technical details on the one hand and talking to a general audience of interested people from all back grounds. Feedback and constructive criticism certainly appreciated. Looking forward to continue discussing the shortcoming and limitations of the Lightning Network protocol in the future. Thanks to Bitcoin Magazine for the invitation and for being open to criticism.
Just another 18 months. lol
Great service for the community. Thank you.
For context, I own BTC which I store on a Ledger. However all of my Ordinals trades are funded through newly purchased BTC. Part superstition I guess but I don’t sell my HoDL inventory! 😂
Centralised and cancelable failing transactions does not sound like bitcoin at all, maybe you can read the bitcoin whitepaper, and start using bitcoin cash instead...
A dead chain
Theres also multiple versions of the bible.
Just because its an origin idea does not mean its optimal.
@ryan-qw5fi the hash rate means Bitcoin is optimal. The whole point of crypto is to be secure.
@@sang3Etai would argue that not segregating the witnesses would be much more secure than higher hash rates. When have we ever even seen a succesfull 51% attack on BCH?
@@edyinthesky The free market chose SegWit and block chain size that would keep it on personal computers (decentralised).
ncie talk. interesting
Simply shilling their services
Lol
Terrible moderator
bitcoin needs L2 to scale….
i prefer statechain over ligthning
I’m not worried about the lightning network.There are 2 companies that i trust and I’m confident they are going to figure out lightning probably by the end of this decade.Those 2 companies are based in California and they are:Lightspark and Lightning Labs
Oh man this so boring