The Sony 12-24 F2.8 First Impressions! Better than the Sigma 14-24 F2.8?
Вставка
- Опубліковано 6 вер 2024
- How does the Sony 12-24 2.8 stack up to the more affordable Sigma 14-24mm 2.8?
Check out more info on the Sony 12-24mm F2.8: bhpho.to/3gyHoCY
Gear used in video:
Sigma 14-24 2.8: bhpho.to/2ZK7VGG
Sony 12-24 2.8:
Dual camera strap: amzn.to/2BPfW50
MIC: geni.us/Seinmic
Sound mixer: amzn.to/2MkWQFV
Aputure light: amzn.to/2PUqXXf
LED tree: amzn.to/2ZIq5sp
My Lightroom presets: www.manuelortiz...
Social Media
My Instagram: geni.us/Mortiz
Business Inquiries: mannyortizphoto@gmail.com
Facebook: geni.us/Mannyfb
Where I get my music: goo.gl/iC6wmY
MY 2020 CAMERA GEAR KIT:
bhpho.to/3aHH8OI
The Sony’s rocking the $3,000 price tag and that’s enough for me to back away. 2mm on the wide end might matter more for video, but no paid gig will differentiate if you deliver good 14mm content
Must be the first time I`ve heard "The Sigma is smaller and lighter"
I was literally just about to comment the same thing! 😂
Sigma 24-70 art is also smaller and lighter then G master 24-70 ..
@@neerajkukreja2990 , and also apparently Sigma's new 1.4/85mm DG DN lens is smaller and ~200gr lighter ... but to compensate for that it's also better than the Sony GM :)
i laughed so hard when his dog opened the door and entered his room without him realising 😂👊
Bought the Sigma 14-24 and the Nisi filter kit in January and it's permanently attached to one of my A7III's. Absolutely one of the best lenses I've ever used.
For landscape, would you recommend a 14-24 or a 16-35 lens?
@@chrispy4u2 For year's in my canon days the 16-35 was a staple. I'm now on Sony and the 14-24 is my go-to wide-angle. As for filters you just have to be prepared to use the 150mm size.
I twin the 14-24 with the Sony 24-105 and the Sigma 100-400 and I'm totally covered for stills.
For timelapse on my other camera body I use the TT Artisan 11mm Fisheye, the Vogtlander 12mm and the Zeiss Batis 18mm
The 16-35 might be better suited to your needs when filters are added but only you will know this.
@@TrevorMcGrathPhotography thank you for the help... I was considering the Sony gm f2.8 16-35 for landscape
@@chrispy4u2 Thats a lot money for one lens. Looks at all the options and how that focal range fits into you covering all you need. Think 16mm to at least 200mm and even up to 400. From there make out your budget and the best quality you can afford to buy.
Sigma Art range is unreal quality
@@chrispy4u2 it depends on how do you work. Usually 16-35 is a more polivalent lens, but for me (I was 4 years shooting with a prime 14mm 90% of the time) even 14 mm is not enough. If I bought the sigma it was due to 2mm and slightly better optic don't worth the extra 1700€ for me, but man, sometimes I missed it.
This man deserves a million subs for always have a simple but great/informative video. More power manny!
I like the fact that Sony probably thinks you made a video supportive of their G-master lens, but in reality you convinced me to get the Sigma because like you, I am not a UWA photography buff and in reality - the difference you showed between 12 and 14 won't matter because the number of times I'll use that lens at 14 is already so rare, that its not like I use it perpetually at 14 and would give a right arm for just a little more width. Thanks for your unintended recommendation!
"Sony" means "overpriced"
Sigma 14 1.8 Art + Sigma 20 1.4 Art + Sigma 24 1.4 Art cost less than $3 000. ) Or you can take Sigma 14-24 2.8 + Sigma 24-70 2.8 = $2 400
This lens is all over my feed. I love how you're straight to the point though. Thank you as usual - looking forward to your wide angle video that's otw
If Sony sent you this and you kept it a secret, then you must have the new A7SIII as well! Lol. Atleast give us tiny hints
Those tiny hints would cost him a lot of money.
Why? you still have to wait to buy like everyone else. He'd just fall out out of Sony's favor over dumb shit like that.
He's shooting on it
They definitely sent it to him seeing as the embargo for all the other youtubers lifted at the same time. He got it early as he’s considered press
How could i get early sony products or other brands before released?
I'll wait for Tamron to make a 10-17 f2.8 to complement my 17-28 f2.8 🤣🤣
Epic. Your production value is off the hook. Your videos have become noticeably better over time.
That 2mm can make a huge difference when shooting interior architecture. I think 12mm is too wide but it helps in super small rooms and bathrooms for real estate.
Woof. At those prices, guess I'm always gonna be a G but never a GMaster.
Tamron for life baby
I own the Sigma 14-24mm 2.8 and LOVE it! bought it used at Adorama for a really good price and it was in mint condition. In this comparison, would Sony which cost double than the Sigma performs 2 times better? I guess not.
After using both for quite a while, I actually think both are really good value, despite the massive price tag of the Sony. I've been lucky with my copy, pretty much perfectly centered at all focal lengths. Staggeringly sharp too, at 24mm my 12-24 GM is sharper in the centre than both of the 24mm GM lenses I've had. That thing is known for it's sharpness, and this zoom beats it (on both A1 and Riv, so a true test of sharpness at high res).
freaking disclosure agreements, 5 new alerts all at the same time, all about same subject and i only picked this one
12mm helps to save more area during correcting the vertical lines of interiors on the edges of the frame. The lens is pricy but it's an investment.
I struggle now finding use cases for my 14mm-24mm @14mm, my favorite wide-angle lenses are the Sigma 20mm 1.4 and Sony 24mm 1.4. Fast moderate wide-angle lenses are much more useful to me than zooms at 2.8, but that is me, I'm sure real-estate photographers appreciate having a 12mm option.
Bro you should do a side-by-side of the 12-24 F2.8 VERSES 12-24 F4. Is there a DIFFERENCE?
Thank you sir, for me very useful your this video
Get the sigma and the samyang 12mm, problem solved. Gorgeous pics as always
2mm is significant but just not needed for my style. Now to decide between the 1424 vs sonys 1636.
Nice to see you Manny!
The corners at f/13 is what to test. Test distortion, test vignetting. f/13 is the best for corner-to-corner sharpness. Sigma 14mm is great for architecture and interior. 12mm would make it wide and unnatural. The idea of the 12-24mm flexibility should be for movies but for photos the Sigma 14mm f/1.8 should remain a winner for that ultimate one-shot quality.
The VIDEO we needed as soon as we heard this release!
IMO though, Sigma 14-24 + 24-70 over GMaster lens, unless you are desperate for that 2mm, you are chilling.
Just buy 2 sweet manual wide angles! Autofocus is pretty much unnecessary when shooting at 12 mm and even at 20mm you can set your depth of field tape it and forget it. Nice video though.
It bothers me that she answered like she had a mic with her. lol Keep making a dope video man. Killer lens
2:02 unicorn came into the room!
I want the Sony. I saw one in the box on a shelf, and my heart raced.
Sigma. Man, that Sony is expensive!
At this point, there is really no bad lenses that you can buy. It really comes to how much you are willing to spend.
Just like how a wallet can cost 5AUD in Kmart but an LV can cost up to a 1000AUD. They basically do the same thing and I am not judging anyone who's going over LV over Kmart.
Same thing here. Not gonna judge. You buy what you are willing to pay and don't try to pay for something you can't afford, just to look good.
leather straps, tattoos, muscles, on the hunt in the city. This man is badass, for a sensitive creative photographer
Thank you! Amazon Netherlands has a deal of EUR 650 for a new Sigma 14-24 f2.8, which is insane. Based on these videos, I bought it. I have the 20mm f1.8, but sometimes I am a bit struggling with the focal range.
Great review. I still think that "the big difference 12-14mm" could be compensated with "stepping back". I try to imagine the situation to justify 3k$ which is double of 14mm GM Sony. Great channell. ❤
Just bought the Sigma. All things being nearly equal, I’m good despite the extra two mm. And w/o the $3k price tag!
How i wish I can have the same equipments that you have Manny. I'd better start dreaming and work hard! Cant wait for your upcoming video!
3:19
Jared be like wait I did a whole vid on it 💀
Hey bro, what brand is.your strap? It looks fantastic man!
I Love my Sigma 😍...it‘s a very Good Lens with very food quality....i don‘t Need the extra 2mm,
i can go few steps back ...
Ok so I didn’t see any sponsor drops in your video so I’m going to watch the adds for you. 👌🏻
3 grand is a lot of money tbh for 2mm. You gotta start thinking cost vs efficiency.
The intro was rlly good!
Videos are getting better and better ✊🏾✊🏾✊🏾
Bro what camera did you shoot this first shot on? Looks sooo good
Sigma is the preferred choice with a big difference in price, little difference in dimensions, light weight and smaller size
its not only about the 12-14 range, it is the first 12mm f2.8 in a zoom so just for that 12-14 is worth another 1600$
I know I am a year late to this but just picked up the mint used Sigma 14-24/2.8 DG DN Art and deciding if I should keep it. Last year I picked up the Sony FE 14mm f/1.8 GM and its great but I always take it and my FE 16-35/2.8 out together so its a two lens combo and deciding if I can just now take out the Sigma. Of course I could always just take the 14/1.8, 20/1.8, and 24/1.4 but again that's a lot of lens switching and miss out on the >14 to 20 range. Too many choices. Thanks for your video.
I know I am also a year late after you- I'm looking at the sigma 14-24, Sony 16-35gm ii, and Sony 12-24 gm. What did you keep and what's in your rotation
@@perpetualcaustic I ended up settling in on the Sony 16-35/2.8 GM II when it came out. I sold the Sigma 14-24 but it was a very nice lens but I didn’t shoot that wide often enough. Still have the 14/1.8 prime but it’s not getting much use but that’s just me.
Excited to see the one with Pierre! Diana chiming is had my dying. That lens is wild.
Your vids getting better and better! love it man! keep it up!
Hahaha hey babe does 2mm matter?😂😂 Best part of the video lol love the vids Manny🙏🤘🏼
This video felt like so many questions were left unanswered with regard to the lenses and its comparisons
What a beast! Great job as usual, my friend!
Just bought the 24mm 1.4 GM. How do you think it compares to this lens ?
WOW I didn't even know! Looks dope 🤯
😝
I saw you in the last seconds of the vid, excited about the next video pierreeeeee.
I dont mean to be so offtopic but does someone know a tool to log back into an Instagram account..?
I somehow forgot the password. I love any help you can offer me.
@Giovanni Paul instablaster ;)
@Juan Billy I really appreciate your reply. I got to the site through google and im in the hacking process atm.
I see it takes quite some time so I will reply here later with my results.
@Juan Billy it worked and I now got access to my account again. Im so happy!
Thanks so much you saved my ass !
Not here to wreck shop, big fan of Manny's video and work. But I'm not buying anything until this pandemic is over ✌🏾 hope y'all stay safe. Thank you for your videos Manny.
Dude you are killing it with that intro !
sigmas sharpness is out of this world!! it blinds people
Shout out from the south side! Appreciate your videos homie they help a lot 🙌🏽 not sure if you have any work shops down here but I’d be interested if so
Please make video on Samyang AF 14mm f/2.8 Lens. Can you please share your review on Samyang AF 14mm f/2.8 Lens
I really can’t decide between the sigma 14-24mm or the tamron 17-28mm. I shoot mostly landscape and architecture. There is an obvious price difference. My concern mostly is the rear lens filters. “They’re hard to get in Canada, and the attached lens hood” which may break? But then, is the 17-28mm wide enough?
Get the Sigma 14 - 24, but true, if you work with filter, it may be a hassle
Marco Tschilar hmm I am leaning towards that lens but I do use nd filters so I can use slow shutter speeds in daylight.
Your dog comes in like he owns the place
That intro frame was on point! 👍🏽💯
Got a trip to Vegas coming up. Should I buy this lens? Or just take my 16-35 g master?
2:08 dwl! The way the dog just rolled up in there like this my room son!! And you with the excuse me!! 🤣
Great video dude
what camera and lenses was shot on and what light was used on this video fragment 0:01
Damn the opening b-roll was whoa 🙌🙌
Hey, your Audio would be better if you give the Shotgun-Mic more distance. Greetings from Hanover Germany
That intro Broll was sick!!
I still preefer the Sigma Art DG DN line above Sony GM
Mirrorless duo by Sigma is delightfull
Another great video, looking forward for your next video. I can't spend any more money in any of sony GM lens, as much as I love to use GM lenses but I can't . I think I'm good with my old 10-18 F4 for the crop sensor which is equivalent to 15-27 and if i need faster lenses, I will use my 24 f1.4 GM lens .
Very nice lens. I have the 12-24mm f/4 which is just fine for me. But the one I really like is my 10mm f/5.6 Voigtländer. At $3k it's a bit hard to justify this lens for me.
Which one has best controlled CA, coma and astigmatism for astrophotography..?
I'll miss the $$ before I miss 2mm at the low end. Sigma is the easy choice for me!
Now that we have new tech does the sony gm compensate for breathing, distortion etc.?
Goat vibes from this video
Looks dope man! Can't wait to get my hands on it.
Manny what video profile and camera was the intro shot on? It was hella crispy and nice
Looks like it's an awesome lens. Are you planning on making your videos 4K anytime soon? 4K would be great for IQ for lens reviews. Just like the difference 12mm and 14mm, 4K is better than 1080p. Heehee.
Nice video! I can't wait for tomorrow's!
Do you recommend any filter adapter kit for Sony 12-24 f/2.8?
Manny, always enjoy your videos, and you're funny. But my question is...the person who is shooting you - the camera movement is so smooth...please tell me what stabilizer they are using, and what camera! Thanks.
Hey Allen he is using a DJI Ronin S gimbal :)
please compare it to 12-24 f4. interior photography. Thx Manny
Did you try both lenses with Catalyst stabilizing? I tried it with Sigma 14-24 and Catalyst creates a fish eye bubble distortion in the center of the frame (full frame).
What’s the best lens to video blog with while using the Sony A6600? and what’s the best Lens to take pictures with?
"Hey Babe!" behind the door. Too funny ;-)
Yes the video with P Lambert was dope. Please multiply this!
Manny, great video. Where did you get your camera strap from?
Please Do a COMPARISON REVIEW on
20mm f1.8 SONY VS 14-24mm f2.8 SIGMA
it'll be a great help for us..
Love from NEPAL.
I have these two lens.
always TOP Manny! I just presented on my channel 35mm 1.4 Samyang. Have you ever tried on Sony?
This is a specialty lens that few people have the budget for. I'd mount the 10-18 f/4 aps-c lens on a FF body if I really need that 12mm FOV.
There is a significant difference between a 12mm and 15mm field of a view.
@@Thumpr110 a nod is as good as a wink to a blind horse
What camera was this review filmed with?
Hey man, quick opinion appreciated , looking for an ultra-wide for my Sony A7 IV ; torn between Sony 14mm 1.8 and Sigma 14-24 ; both are somewhere in the same price range that I can afford ; please advice
For that price point, I think the 2mm is negligible. $1500 is too wide of a difference for the differences in spec of the lenses. Great video man!
How was the flaring in both the lenses? It seems like the Sony was built to handle this better then their f/4
Hey Manny, is the AF really the same? My Sigma has a f... pumping before it comes sharp! Used on the 7R4...
Damn 2mm does make a difference but if everything else compares the same I wouldn’t pay an extra almost 2 grand for the extra 2mm
Lol @ asking his wife if 2mm matters on the wide end 🤣🤣
Damn, great video! Intro sequence very fresh and helped me actually decide on getting the Sigma version as I don't need the extra mm and weight and price are major factor. Ryan Cassell put me on to your page, taking notes and look forward to following along
Hi can someone help me, my wife is newish to photography and has a Canon 90d 15-55mm standard lens and has a cropped sensor 1.5, (whatever that mean) she wants to buy the Irix 15 - 2.4 wide angle lens .. The question is will the Irix add "wide angle" compared to the standard lens she has ? Is the 500 euro worth it ? She thinks it may not add much more side angle depth to the photo than with the standard lens she got with the camera .. If anyone can help wld be greatly appreciated 🙏
Manny please test Voigtlander HYPER WIDE HELIAR VM 10 mm f/5.6 / Sony E