Origins: The Butterfly Enigma

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 2 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 31

  • @MrWholphin
    @MrWholphin 5 років тому +3

    Nice to see Paul Nelson on the show

  • @comanche66100
    @comanche66100 5 років тому +9

    Evo-lunacy is on life support!

  • @2fast2block
    @2fast2block 5 років тому +11

    One of the tons of reasons God says in Romans @ "...so that people are without excuse."
    Praise God for all of His designs!!!

  • @flaguy999
    @flaguy999 6 років тому +17

    After watching this how could anyone still believe that this incredible transformation is the product of blind random chance processes.

    • @annanoelroduner
      @annanoelroduner 5 років тому +2

      Exactly! God created everything! Incidentally Darwin was not a scientist anyway, he was an arrogant theologian who missed halve the Scriptures ->> as many do today.

    • @Andreiiul
      @Andreiiul 5 років тому +3

      That's because it's not random. Life is far from chaos just mixing around and life forms pop out. It's a phenomenon driven by the laws of nature. See the Fibonacci distribution, why do you think it pops up allover in nature.

    • @gemguy6812
      @gemguy6812 5 років тому +5

      @@Andreiiul laws of nature without a lawgiver- that's a miracle!

    • @MrWeezer55
      @MrWeezer55 3 роки тому

      @@gemguy6812 Nope. When a scientist uses the word "law" he's describing observable phenomena. Your use of "law" is more on the order of "an edict passed down from on high". Totally different.

    • @slushyislush5077
      @slushyislush5077 3 роки тому

      UA-cam would never allow this to go viral. Or show up in a random search.

  • @WienArtist
    @WienArtist 4 роки тому +3

    Great video! I truly enjoy how Dr. Nelson explains the very serious problem(s) that face Darwinian evolution. Foresight has always been an unsolved issue with atheistic evolutionists, and yet they merely continue to vehemently shout, "Evolution is a fact!", without adequately addressing this issue. That's because they cannot honestly answer the questions. Thank you very much for sharing this video with us!

    • @patldennis
      @patldennis 3 роки тому

      Well you are a mammal, in case you forgot.

  • @rlunnerstall
    @rlunnerstall 5 років тому +2

    Thank You
    Gentlemen 🌈🕊

  • @stealthhits93
    @stealthhits93 5 років тому +2

    The mind is the answer

  • @2fast2block
    @2fast2block 5 років тому +2

    So much truth to 'a fool has no delight in understanding'. So much truth to Satan being the father of lies out to deceive others. NO ONE can be so ignorant, stupid, dumb, foolish, etc, to think this just came about by mere chance, it could ONLY happen by deception. A deception that those deceived were looking to be deceived. They chose deception over the truth because they don't like where the truth led, to a supernatural creator, God.

    • @tdoc666___
      @tdoc666___ 9 місяців тому +1

      you took the words from my mouth hahaha, i was about to say that...

  • @chrisjones-rd8it
    @chrisjones-rd8it 3 роки тому +2

    I know why butterflies exist the way they do............God wanted it to grow that way...simple answer

  • @richardguerrero3315
    @richardguerrero3315 2 роки тому

    What does the bible say about alien life in the Universe?

  • @vitaquasus1120
    @vitaquasus1120 4 роки тому +2

    cut it out, you know in 76 quint-zillion years the Darwinist will fill in a gap here and a gap there...
    this was a great discussion thank you for it

  • @terreliv
    @terreliv 4 роки тому

    The picture sucks. You can swim the border. That said, I get the idea.
    The microevolution of "A" would prolly be a rhombus/diamond, square, and trapezoid.

  • @Actuary1776
    @Actuary1776 5 років тому +1

    I like how they promote science when it doesn’t contradict their dogma then piss it to the wind otherwise - see YEC.

    • @geoant9802
      @geoant9802 4 роки тому

      a statement that can be applied to every human and organization on the planet. Were you intending to apply this to naturalists or to creationists?