Hazrat Fatima uz Zahra Ke Shahadat Aur Unka Qatil Kon?Aur Moala Ali Ke Bait Ka Maslaa Kyon????
Вставка
- Опубліковано 8 жов 2024
- Hazrat Fatima uz Zahra Ke Shahadat Aur Unka Qatil Kon?Aur Moala Ali Ke Bait Ka Maslaa Kyon????
#junaidrehmanislamicofficial #junaidrehman #islamicjournalist #muftifazalhamdard #hazratumar #interfaithharmony #junaidrehmanislamicjournalist #ahlebait #quran #fatimakaqatilkon #fatimazahra #fatimakeshahadat #abubakarkebait #khilafat #hassanallahyari #hassanallahyariurdu #engineermuhammadalimirza #muftifazalhamdard
😭Hazrat Fatima Ki Shahadat Or Hazrat Umar | Mufti Fazal Hamdard |
Join my Channel Peace Thinker
/ @muftifazalhamdard
/ @muftifazalhamdard
For Patreon:
/ mfhamdard
#muftifazalhamdard #hazratfatima #shahadat #hazratumar #islam #quran #peace #interfaithharmony #unity #globalpeace #humanity #history
Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the copyright act 1976, allowance is made for fair use for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favour of fair use.
Contact With Me On Social Media
ماشاءاللہ جنید بھائی آپ نے بہترین انداز میں محترم مفتی فضل ہمدرد صاحب سے مشکل ترین سوالات کیے ۔ آپ نے قبلہ مفتی صاحب سے وہ اہم سوالات کیے جو غالباً تمام اہلِ سُنت حضرات اُن سے کافی عرصے سے نہیں پوچھ رہے تھے ، وہ الگ بات ہے کہ قبلہ مفتی صاحب آپکے چبھتے سوالات کا تسلی بخش جواب نہیں دے سکے ۔ جنید بھائی آپ ایسے ہی بہترین سوالات کرتے ہیں ماشاءاللہ ۔
We love ❤ Mufti Fazal Hamdard deep in our hearts for his stand on Siraat e Mustaqeem, love of Ahlebait A.S and Haq beyani Allah Pak in ki hifazat farmaye Ameen
Well Done Junaid Rehman Excellent Podcast ❤
Mashallah Excellent Podcast Junaid Rehman Sb ❤
Jeo hamdard bhi app jaisay muhibay ahlibait ki Islam ko zarurat hay ❤
Bohat acha laga dekh kar program.
ایک طرف قبلہ مفتی فضل ہمدرد یہ اُصول بیان کرتے ہیں کہ أصح الكتب بعد كتاب الله بخاری ہے ، اور دوسری طرف خود ہی بخاری کی کئی احادیث کے ردر میں متعدد پروگرام کر چکے ہیں ۔یعنی مفتی صاحب کے اپنے ہی قول اور فعل میں واضح فرق موجود ہے ۔
As far as what has been mentioned in a few narrations that Ali (R.A.) and Zubair (R.A.) gathered at the house of Fatima (R.A.) and Umar (R.A) went there and threatened them, I would like to say that apparently after the burial of Rasoolullah (S.A.W.) and before the general Bay’at in the Masjid, Ali (R.A.) and Zubair (R.A.) and a few Muhajireen Sahabah gathered at the house of Fatima (R.A.) and thought that because the general Bay’at had not yet been taken, we should appoint Ali (R.A.) as the Khalifah. They discussed this matter amongst themselves and Zubair (R.A.) also announced that he will back Ali (R.A.) with his sword. On the other hand many of the Muhajireen and Ansaar had already taken Bay’at on the hands of Abubakar (R.A.) at Saqeefa Bani Saaidah, now if another Khalifah had to be appointed, there was a great fear of revolt and the Ansaar would again have demanded that an Ameer be appointed from amongst them. Therefore, in order to suppress this revolt Umar (R.A) went to Fatima (R.A.)’s house and at that time Ali (R.A.) and Zubair (R.A.) were not present. It has been stated in Kanzul Ummal that Umar (R.A) told Fatima (R.A.) that: “O the daughter of Rasoolullah (S.A.W.), nobody from amongst the people is more beloved to me than your father and nobody is more beloved to me than you after your father. I have received the bad news that these people are gathering in your house and conspiring against the Khilaafat of Abubakar. If they do not stop conspiring then by Allah! I will burn their homes.” On saying this Umar (R.A) left and when Ali (R.A.) and Zubair (R.A.) arrived at the house of Fatima (R.A.), Fatima (R.A.) said to them: “Do you know that Umar came to see me and he has taken an oath that if you conspire against the Khilaafat of Abubakar he will burn your homes? By Allah! Umar will most definitely fulfil his oath. Therefore leave my house with the intention of dropping your opinions and thoughts and do not return with the same object.” Ali (R.A.) and Zubair (R.A.) left the house and did not gather there again until they took Bay’at on the hands of Abubakar (R.A.). (Kanzul Ummal, Vol. 5, Page 651)
From this narration of Kanzul Ummal a few points have become clear and evident:
When Umar (R.A) arrived at Fatima (R.A.)’s house Ali (R.A.) and Zubair (R.A.) were not present, therefore neither did Umar (R.A) meet them nor did a fight or quarrel break out.
Mashaallah mufti hamdard sahib Allah bless you for speaking out haq and truth /most of our sunnies mulas follow umwi Islam not the Islam of rasoolallah thats why the mulas don't tell the truth they hide and twest words of ahaadis
امیر المومینین امام المتقین سید الوصیین مولا علی علیہ السلام رسول پاک ص کے بعد کائنات کی ھر شے سے افضل ھیں
اپنی گفتگو میں قبلہ مفتی صاحب یہ فرماتے ہیں کہ سادات غماریہ ہمارے اصل اکابر ہیں مگر ساتھ ہی ساداتِ غماریہ کے اُصولوں کو ماننے کے لیے تیار نہیں ۔
Umar (R.A) associated with Fatima (R.A.) in a very respectful manner and also mentioned to her that she was more beloved to him than his own children.
Umar (R.A) did not threaten Fatima (R.A.) in any way.
When Umar (R.A) left Fatima (R.A.)’s house, both Fatima (R.A.) and her home were sound and intact. No harm was afflicted on either of them. Later when Ali (R.A.) arrived Fatima (R.A.) did not complain of Umar (R.A) behaving in a disrespectful manner, rather she advised him not to oppose Umar (R.A) and not to conspire against the Khilaafat of Abubakar (R.A.) in her house in future.
Ali (R.A.) and Zubair (R.A.) took Bay’at on the hands of Abubakar (R.A.) without any coercion.
The accusations that have been levelled against Umar (R.A) that he broke down the door of Ali (R.A.)’s house and approached Ali (R.A.) and Fatima (R.A.) in a disrespectful manner and due to this Fatima (R.A.) suffered a miscarriage is totally false and a mere fabrication. In reality those who levelled this accusation are disgracing and Ali (R.A.) and Fatima (R.A.) and also making a mockery of Islam. Was Ali (R.A.) so cowardly that he could not defend his house nor avenge his wife?! When Ali (R.A.) became Khalifah why did he not take revenge nor claim the blood money from the family of Umar (R.A) for the child that he had lost?! The ones who narrate these types of narrations are in actual fact the enemies of Islam. They portray the Sahabah (R.A.) in front of the Kuffar in such a fallacious manner that they were thirsty for governance, they had no legal system, the strong used to suppress the weak, to speak the truth was a crime, the oppressors were not punished, lies were spoken in order to please rulers, just as the hypocrites they too had hatred in their hearts for their rulers. Can your heart accept such accusations and nonsense? Could the senior Sahabah behaved in such a manner? Were such Sahabah not capable of demolishing great empires such as that of Qaisar and Kisra with scanty ammunitions and means? Will Allah Ta’ala assist such oppressors
Gio Hamdard Bhai❤
Imam Ali killed all the top leaders of kresh and made enemies for Allah and rasoolallah but other ashabs didn't have any enemies/only imam Ali saved Islam and all the ashabs and their families in every battle it was because of imam Ali that deen of Allah and rasoolallah rose to such power that no one could stop it spreading all over the world
اِس فقیر کی ادنیٰ سی رائے قبلہ مفتی صاحب کے متعلق یہ ہے کہ قبلہ مفتی صاحب اپنے علم میں Puzzle Personality کا شکار ہیں ۔
No body is against Ahlrbait عليه السلام. It is just propaganda. The issue is we have to follow the teachings of prophet صلى الله عليه و سلم. The teachings can not be different . There can not be different teachings so why all these issues. We should be one umma.
حضرت ابوبکر کا مرتے ہوئے افسوس کاش میں نے فاطمہ ع کا دروازہ نہ کھولا ہوتا۔ حوالہ تاریخ طبری
He is not hadees 😂but history book fabricated stories not a hujat OF ala sunnat not he authentic sources ۔
AGR khilafat pr Saaba r ۔z ka itlfaq tha to shia imamat PR bhi aisi tarah itlfaq hai blka is se zayada itlafaq pya jata hai ۔UN ke AVLOD ke muttbik unke avlod ka itlafaq ۔۔۔۔
دیکھیے ۔۔۔۔۔صحابہ ایمانیات کا حصّہ نہیں ہیں ۔۔۔
جو مانتا ہے اس کی مرضی جو نہیں مانتا اس پے کوئی گناہ نہیں ۔۔۔
صحابہ حجّت نہیں ہیں
کسی بھی سہی حدیث سے ثابت نہیں ہوتا کے صحابہ کو جو نہیں مانتا وو اسلام سے خارج ہے ۔۔۔
According to both Sunni and Shia narrations, Hadrat Abu Bakr (radhiallahu anhu) was greatly saddened by the developments and by Hadrat Fatima’s displeasure. He went to great lengths to please her while remaining firm on the Shariah. He went to her home, stood at her door in the midday sun and asked Hadrat Ali (radhiallahu anhu) to be his intercessor in his sincere attempt to placate and please Hadrat Fatima (radhiallahu anha). Ultimately she became pleased with him and accepted his decision. These narrations appear in Madaarijun Nubuwwah, Kitaabul Wafaa, Baihaqi and in the commentaries of Mishkaat (all authoritative Kitaabs of the Ahlus Sunnah).
Kitaabul Muwaafiqah narrates that Anaani said:
“ Abu Bakr (radhiallahu anhu) came to the door of Fatima (radhiallahu anha) in the midday sun and said: ‘I shall not leave from here as long as the daughter of Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) remains displeased with me. Hadrat Ali (radhiallahu anhu) came to Fatima (radhiallahu anha) and giving her an oath urged her to become pleased. Then she became pleased (with Hadrat Abu Bakr).”
Further narrations state: [as quoted above]
When Hadrat Fatima (radhiallahu anha) fell sick Abu Bakr Siddiq (radhiallahu anhu) came and asked permission to see her.
Ali said: “Fatima, here is Abu Bakr asking permission to see you.” She said: “Would you like me to give him permission?” (Al-Dhahabi said in the Siyar (Al Arna’ut ed. 2:121): “She applied the Sunna by not giving permission to anyone to enter her husbands house except by his command.”)
He said yes, whereupon she gave him permission. He entered to see her, seeking her good pleasure, and said: “By Allah! I did not leave my house, property, family, and tribe except to please Allah, and to please His Prophet, and to please you, the People of the House (ahl al bayt)! He continued to seek her good pleasure until she was pleased.” [*]
أخبرنا أبو عبد الله الحافظ ثنا أبو عبد الله محمد بن يعقوب الحافظ ثنا محمد بن عبد الوهاب ثنا عبدان بن عثمان العتكي بنيسابور ثنا أبو ضمرة عن إسماعيل بن أبي خالد عن الشعبي قال ثم لما مرضت فاطمة رضي الله عنها أتاها أبو بكر الصديق رضي الله عنه فاستأذن عليها فقال علي رضي الله عنه يا فاطمة هذا أبو بكر يستأذن عليك فقالت أتحب أن آذن له قال نعم فأذنت له فدخل عليها يترضاها وقال والله ما تركت الدار والمال والأهل والعشيرة إلا ابتغاء مرضاة الله ومرضاة رسوله ومرضاتكم أهل البيت ثم ترضاها حتى رضيت
[*] Bayhaqi (rahimullah) in al Sunan al Kubra (6:300-301) and Dala’il al-Nubuwwa (7:273-281) who said: “It is narrated with a fair (hasan) chain.”
Muhibb al Din al-Tabari (rahimullah) cited it in al Riyad Al Nadira (2:96-97 #534) and Dhahabi (rahimullah)in the Siyar (Ibid).
Ibn Kathir (rahimullah) states it as Sahih in his Al Bidayah and Ibn Hajar (rahimullah) in his Fath Al Bari.
Imam Ali was the first one to gather full quran dictated by rasoolallah but ashabs rejected because it was detailed with tafseer
Muhtrum Junaid Bhai Waqai app ne Umda Session kia lkn Mufti Sahb ne Osool ki Dhajiya bakher deen Ek Taraf to Al-HamduLillah wo Maan gayen k Sayedda FATIMA a.s ka Qatal nhi howa or sath hi ye bhi kh diya k me Shiyon k Mokif ko bhi Galat nhi khta wo Shiyon k nazdeek drust hai
Junaid bhai ne tou mufti ki band kar di.
ایک طرف قبلہ مفتی صاحب فرماتے کہ وہ جنابِ سیدہ سلام اللہ علیہا کی شہادت کے واقعے کو صحیح نہیں مانتے یعنی قبلہ مفتی صاحب جنابِ سیدہ سلام اللہ علیہا کی طبعی وفات کے قائل نظر آئے مگر ساتھ ہی فرماتے ہیں کہ وہ اِس معاملے میں شیعہ مرویات کا بھی انکار نہیں کرتے اور وہ مرویات صحیح ہیں ؟
مفتی فضل ھمدرد صاحب ایک سچے کھرے سنی ھیں جیسے علامہ یاسین قادری صاحب ڈاکٹر صداقت فریدی صاحب اور علامہ طیب گیلانی صاحب بہترین علماء اھلسنت ھیں
Molana ishhaq Allah bless him ;he said all the badges and achievements of imam Ali were given to others to put them up against imam Ali:/and 1000s of fake ahaadis were made by the order of mawiya and top ashabs were killed who loved alibat and specially imam Ali
پھر اپنی گفتگو میں قبلہ مفتی صاحب مصنف ابن ابی شیبہ کی جعلی حدیث کو صحیح قرار دیتے ہیں اور اُس روایت کو بخاری کی حدیث پر مقدم رکھتے ہیں ، پھر دونوں احادیث میں کسی قسم کی کوئی تطبیق پیدا کرنے میں ناکام نظر آئے اور اُصولِ تعارض و تطبیق کو روندتے ہوئے چلے گئے ۔
قبلہ مفتی صاحب آپ ایک جانب زہری کی ایک روایت ماننے کو تیار ہیں جبکہ دوسری روایت ماننے سے انکار کرتے ہیں یہ دہرا معیار ہے اصول حدیث میں اس طرح نہیں چلتا۔
پھر مفتی صاحب اپنی گفتگو میں المستدرک الحاکم و بیہقی کی صحیح حدیث کے مقابلے میں زہری کے قول پر اعتماد کرتے ہوئے حضرت ابوسعید الخدری رضی اللہ عنہ کی حدیث کو ماننے سے قاصر رہے ۔
شیعہ مذہب میں کل کتنے فرقے ہیں
زہری کے اِدراج کے متعلق قبلہ مفتی صاحب کو کوئی علم نہیں ۔
بیعتِ مولا علی علیہ السلام کے متعلق قبلہ مفتی صاحب کا علم بہت ہی ناقص ہے آپکو چاہیے کہ اِس معاملے میں اپنے علم کو وسعت فرمائے ۔
Then why Ali[ra] buried her secretly:
THIS DOESNOT MEAN ANYTHING BCOZ HERE IS THE SAME HADITH:
Bukhari 2.339: Narrated Ibn `Abbas. A person died and Allah’s Apostle used to visit him. He died at night and (the people) buried him at night. In the morning they informed the Prophet (about his death). He said, “What prevented you from informing me?” They replied, “It was night and it was a dark night and so we disliked to trouble you.” The Prophet went to his grave and offered the (funeral) prayer.
Note: This could have been the very same reason for not troubling hz abu bakar(ra) but when later informed he offered the funeral prayer again.
The Shiite asked why was Fatima[ra] buried at night, I want to ask Why was the prophet PBUH buried at night? and why was Aisha[ra]buried at night and many others? You think it’s something strange that people be buried at night? think again.
Secondly women ask specifically to be buried at night because they don’t want anyone to see their bodies even in death and this is out of shyness.
Shaykh Ibn Taymiyyah says in his Minaaj al Sunnah:
وكذلك ما ذكره من إيصائها أن تُدفن ليلا ولا يصلي عليها أحد منهم لا يحكيه عن فاطمة ويحتج به إلا رجل جاهل يطرق على فاطمة ما لا يليق بها
he was saying was that Fatimah didn’t request to not be prayed over by Abu Bakr and others.
Shia always fabricate the story from non-authentic sunni sources, that Umar[ra] threatened to burn the house of Fatima[ra]! & umar[ra] hit her with handle of sword and that resulted in abortion of son namely mohsin & then they beated Ali[ra] for allegiance [bayah].
& they use this sahih hadith from bukhari Volume 5, Book 59, Number 546 as a support & combine it with non-authentic reports & as a whole they imply that what they [shia] portray is correct!
But the truth is that: Aisha (r.a) narrated what she knew. And she didn’t know that Ali (r.a) pledged allegiance in the very beginning. When people started to talk that he didn’t pledged allegiance, he came and did it second time to avoid fitnah & we have sahih hadith which clearly says Ali(ra) gave bayah to abu bakr(ra) on the very first day.
Here is the sunni hadith [sahih isnad but mursal hadith], which proves that umar[ra] neither attacked not threaten fatima[ra] but it shows that umar[ra] showed her merits, from mosanif ibn abi sheebah, vol 13,book maghazi, page 201,hadeeth 38061
حدثنا : محمد بن بشر ، نا : عبيد الله بن عمر ، حدثنا : زيد بن أسلم ، عن أبيه أسلم : أنه حين بويع لأبي بكر بعد رسول الله (ص) كان علي والزبير يدخلان على فاطمة بنت رسول الله (ص) فيشاورونها ويرتجعون في أمرهم ، فلما بلغ ذلك عمر بن الخطاب خرج حتى دخل على فاطمة ، فقال : يا بنت رسول الله (ص) ، والله ما من أحد أحب إلينا من أبيك ، وما من أحد أحب إلينا بعد أبيك منك ، وأيم الله ما ذاك بمانعي إن إجتمع هؤلاء النفر عندك ، أن أمرتهم أن يحرق عليهم البيت ، قال : فلما خرج عمر جاءوها فقالت : تعلمون أن عمر قد جاءني وقد حلف بالله لئن عدتم ليحرقن عليكم البيت وأيم الله ليمضين لما حلف عليه ، فإنصرفوا راشدين ، فروا رأيكم ولا ترجعوا إلي ، فإنصرفوا عنها فلم يرجعوا إليها حتى بايعوا لأبي بكر
This arabic statement ” أن يحرق عليهم البيت ” is the biggest shia trick to deceive the non-arabic members:
Muhammad ibn Bishr from Ubaydullah ibn Umar from Zayd ibn Aslam from his father Aslam [the mawla of Umar.]
When Abu Bakr received the pledges of allegiance after the Messenger of Allah, Ali and al-Zubayr used to enter the presence of Fatima the daughter of the Messenger of Allah and consult with her and hesitate in their allegiance. When news of this reached Umar ibn al-Khattab, he came out until he entered Fatima’s presence and said: “Daughter of the Messenger of Allah, none in all creation was more dearly beloved to me than your father, and none is more beloved to us after him than you. However, by Allah, this shall not prevent me, if that group gathers in your house, to order that their house be set afire!” When Umar went out, they came and she said: “Do you know that `Umar came to me and swore by Allah that if you were to come back, he shall surely burn the door with you inside! By Allah, he shall certainly fulfill what he swore, so go away in peace, flee from your opinion, and do not come back to see me.” They left her and did not return to see her until they pledged their allegiance to Abu Bakr.”
Points to note:
1. Ameer al-Mu‘mineen Omar bin al-Khattab[ra] showed the rank of Fatima[ra] by saying she was most beloved to the people and him after her father.
2. Omar[ra] did not threaten Fatima[ra], but warned her about those gathering in her house. This can be seen by the statement ‘Alaihim’ and not ‘Alaikum’ in the statement ” أن يحرق عليهم البيت ” “if that group gathers in your house, to order that their house be set afire”.
Comment: But shia play the game with arabic because they are jahil persians.
Now the second problem arises for shia’s is that Ali(ra) gave his own daughter to Umar(ra) in nikah & even shia have sahih hadiths on that, as discussed here & here.
Then after this, they will show you this:
Umar Ibn al-Khattab came to the house of Ali. Talha and Zubair and some of the immigrants were also in the house. Umar cried out: “By God, either you come out to render the oath of allegiance, or I will set the house on fire.” al-Zubair came out with his sword drawn. As he stumbled (upon something), the sword fell from his hand so they jumped over him and seized him.”
- Tarikh Tabari Volume 9 page 187
Chain of Transmission:
Mohammed Ibn Humayd: the source of a significant portion of Tarikh Tabari; Ahmed Ibn Hanbal, Ibn Mo’een and Ibn Jarir Tabari considered him trustworthy, although the like of Dhahabi disagreed with that (refer to Mizan al I’tidaal)
Jarir: Ahmed Ibn Hanbal narrated from him in his Musnad, as did Abu Dawud and Tirmidhi
Mugheera: “Scholar, trusted in hadith, wise” Tahtheeb al-Tahtheeb Volume 10 Page 270 #482.
Nisaii likewise trusted him.
Ziyad Ibn Kulayb: Mizan al I’tidaal by Dhahabi, Volume 2 #798 - Nisaii said he was thiqah (trustworthy) as did Ibn Hajar and Ibn Haban
But the problem is that the narration from Tarikh Tabari. It comes via chain:
ابن حميد قال حدثنا جرير عن مغيرة عن زياد بن كليب
There are several problems in this chain.
1) Ibn Humayd: Razi said
He mixes asnaad (chain of narrations) and matan (text) of narrations (دخلت على محمد بن حميد وهو يركب الأسانيد على المتون)
Nasai said:
He is not trustworthy (ليس بثقة)
Asadi said:
ما رايت احدا احذق بالكذب من رجلين: سليمان بن الشاذكوني، ومحمد بن حميد الرازي
I have never seen a natural liar, except for two persons: Sulaymân ash-Shâdhakûnî and Muhammad ibn Humayd ar-Razi. 22
Al Iraqi said
He is one of the liars (هو أحد الكذابين)
Jozjani said
He is not trustworthy (غير ثقة)
www.alrad.net/hiwar/sahaba/11.htm
Jarir ibn Hazim was thiqat, but he got confused in the end of his life. Abdurrahman ibn Mahdi noted that no one heard from him in that time (Abu Saeed al-Alai “al-Mukhtalitin” №8) Ibn Hajar said that he has errs when narrated from his memory. (Taqrib).
3) Mughira ibn Muqsim made tadlis, as he was described by Nasai, and this hadith he reported in muanan form.
4) Ziyad ibn Kulaib Abu Muashar al-Kufi. He was thiqat, but he wasn’t companion. In “Tahzib al-kamal” written the he died in 110 or 119 hijri. Prophet (sallalahu alaihi wa ala alihi wa sallam) died in 11 hijri. So this ibn Kulaib very unlikely was a eye witness of that alleged forced bayah to Abu Bakr (r.a).
So the hadith is weak & disconnected & has the gap of around 100yrs in between the incident.
شاہ ولی اللہ محدث دہلوی نے اپنی تصنیف ازالة الخفا میں لکھا ہے کہ مصنف ابن ابی شیبہ کی روایت کی سند شیخین کے معیار کے حساب سے صحیح ہے۔
اسی طرح حسن بن فرحان المالكي نے اپنی تصنیف قراءة في كتب العقائد میں لکھا ہے کہ مصنف ابن ابی شیبہ کی یہ روایت بالکل صحیح الاسناد ہے۔
اسی طرح إمام الحافظ أبي بكر أحمد بن عمر و بن أبي عاصم الشيباني نے اپنی تصنیف المذكرة التذكير و الذكر میں لکھا ہے کہ مصنف ابن ابی شیبہ کی یہ روایت بالکل صحیح الاسناد ہے۔
اسی طرح إمام الحافظ ابي بَكْرٍ أَحْمَدَ بِنْ عَلَى بَن ثابت الخطيب البغدادي نے اپنی کتاب تاریخ الاسلام میں مصنف ابن ابی شیبہ کی اس روایت کے بارے میں لکھا ہے کہ یہ روایت بالکل صحیح الاسناد ہے۔
Now the question arises: she did not talk to Abu Bakr[ra] as stated in Bukhari by Aisha[ra], so it is the clear contradiction?
Answer: No, it is not a contradiction. It is said in Bukhari that she did not talk till she died. This means she did not talk about FADAK till she died because she was satisfied by the answer given by Abu Bakr[ra] afterwards.
Now still shia try to show that: No, she was angry, & whosoever angered her, angered the prophet & who soever angered prophet angered ALLAH.
Answer: We ahul-sunnah also have sahih hadith that Ali[ra] angered her. Did u saw any ahul-sunnah try to say on that issue that: Ali[ra] angered Fatima[ra] therefore Ali[ra] angered ALLAH? [nauzubillah]
But this slander is only raised by shia’s.
In any case if bil-Fardh Sayyidah Fatimah Radhi Allahu ‘anha did not stop being angry with Sayyidina Abu Bakr Radhi Allahu `anhu, this would reflect badly on Sayyidah Fatimah not on Abu Bakr. Rasoolullah Sallallahu `alyhi wa Sallam was angry with people who quarreled with Abu Bakr, even when it was Abu Bakr who was more at fault!
It is narrated in Sahih Bukhari, kitab ut-Tafseer:
سمعت ابا الدرداء يقول كانت بين ابي بكر وعمر محاورة فاغضب ابو بكر عمر فانصرف عنه عمر مغضبا فاتبعه ابو بكر يساله ان يستغفر له فلم يفعل حتى اغلق بابه في وجهه فاقبل ابو بكر الى رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم فقال ابو الدرداء ونحن عندهفقال رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم اما صاحبكم هذا فقد غامر قال وندم عمر على ما كان منه فاقبل حتى سلم وجلس الى النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم وقص على رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم الخبر قال ابو الدرداء وغضب رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم وجعل ابو بكر يقول والله يا رسول الله لانا كنت اظلمفقال رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم هل انتم تاركون لي صاحبي هل انتم تاركون لي صاحبي اني قلت يا ايها الناس اني رسول الله اليكم جميعا فقلتم كذبت وقال ابو بكر صدقت
صحيح البخاري - کتاب التفسير
There was a dispute between Abu Bakr and ‘Umar, and Abu Bakr made Umar angry. So ‘Umar left angrily. Abu Bakr followed him, requesting him to ask forgiveness (of Allah) for him, but ‘Umar refused to do so and closed his door in Abu Bakr’s face. So Abu Bakr went to Allah’s Apostle while we were with him. Allah’s Apostle said, “This friend of yours must have quarrelled (with somebody).” In the meantime ‘Umar repented and felt sorry for what he had done, so he came, greeted (those who were present) and sat with the Prophet and related the story to him. Allah’s Apostle became angry and Abu Bakr started saying, “O Allah’s Apostle! By Allah, I was more at fault (than Umar).” Allah’s Apostle said, “Will you people not leave, for my sake, my companion? When I said, ‘O people I am sent to you all as the Apostle of Allah,’ you said, ‘You tell a lie.’ while Abu Bakr said, ‘You have spoken the truth .”
جنید بھائ آپکی وجہ سے چھپے ہوۓ بعض مکرو چہرے بنقاب ہو رہے ہیں
میں حیران ہوں وہ بھی اپنے آپ کو مسلمان کہتا ہے جو رسول اللہ صلہ علیہ وآل وسلم کی چہتی بیٹی جس کے لیے رسول اللہ تعطمً کھڑے ہو جایا کرتے تھے اُن کو بنی اللہ کے بعد زبردستی خلیفہ بنایا جن لوگوں نے فاطمہ خاتون جنت کا گھر جلانے کے دھمکی دی اور رسول اللہ صلہ علیہ وآل وسلم کے جنازے کو چھوڑ کر دنیا سمیٹنے میں لگ گۓ اور اُن جہنمی لوگوں نے خاتون جنت کو ناراض کیا اور ہمشہ کے لیے جنت سے محروم ہوگۓ