A step to the right direction indeed !! 👍 How women from a particular faith can be neglected for legitimate rights ?? It's a milestone judgement for equality !! Thanks to SC !! 👍 Jai Hind ! Jai Bharat ! 🇮🇳
No ,If after divorce that woman marry again then that compensation will be cancelled। Only after divorce if that woman remain single then her ex husband have to give her compensasion।This is already in Indian penal code for Hindus ,buddhist Sikh ,Jain ,Christian women।Now muslim women will get this facility
First and foremost, according to shariah law a divorce woman is not entitle to any alimony excluding children maintainance which a father must pay( children maintainance). It now depends on the Muslim woman whether they want to obey Allah's command or others command.
The BJP has consistently used the UCC issue as a tool to polarize voters. The Uniform Civil Code (UCC) is an impracticable form of uniformity that cannot be imposed on the people of a country with diverse backgrounds. After a detailed analysis and well-substantiated arguments in his book titled “Uniform Civil Code, A Critical Study”, the late Padma Bhushan Maulana Wahiduddin Khan, rightly concludes that Article 44 of the Constitution has no legal meaningfulness or ethical value. It was just a piece of imagination by certain minds. It should be eliminated from the constitution just as the useless appendix may be removed from the human body by means of an operation when it proves inimical to good health. Mr. Golwalkar’s views on UCC are worth noting here. He remarked: “Nature abhors uniformity, which is the death-knell of nations. I’m all for the protection of various ways of life, but variety must supplement the nation’s unity and not range itself against it.”
Excellent decision by SC
Second marriage be stopped next ,.then thired child .then uniform civil code .
UCC didn't come???
This is a good decision and should be implemented.
A step to the right direction indeed !! 👍
How women from a particular faith can be neglected for legitimate rights ??
It's a milestone judgement for equality !! Thanks to SC !! 👍
Jai Hind ! Jai Bharat ! 🇮🇳
The "We are special" religion....
Prelude to Uniform Civil code!!
Ask our human rights people..... About "right to alimony".
Pappu may go mad after this judgement. 😂😂😂
Let them belong to any religion but they are mothers only. A great decision by highest court
Right decision by the Hon'ble Apex Court. Everyone should respect the Hon'ble Apex Court Verdict.
If anyone is in opposition to SC verdict may go to those Countries where the question of alimony does not exist after talak or divorce.
Sc good decision so all are human beings equal before law everyone’s rights.
Good decision. This relgion population is scary.
ಹಿಂದೂ ಗಳ ಪರ ಒಂದು ಒಳ್ಳೆ ನ್ಯೂಸ್
Could a divorced muslim woman who claims alimony from her first husband marry a second husband?
That's women right
No ,If after divorce that woman marry again then that compensation will be cancelled।
Only after divorce if that woman remain single then her ex husband have to give her compensasion।This is already in Indian penal code for Hindus ,buddhist Sikh ,Jain ,Christian women।Now muslim women will get this facility
@@seethasravani8263 You should Google to know the actual law.If divorce woman remarry then compensation will be cancelled .
@@seethasravani8263week gender in this world is women 😂🤣
They need men's money to live 🤣
First and foremost, according to shariah law a divorce woman is not entitle to any alimony excluding children maintainance which a father must pay( children maintainance). It now depends on the Muslim woman whether they want to obey Allah's command or others command.
Very sad
The BJP has consistently used the UCC issue as a tool to polarize voters.
The Uniform Civil Code (UCC) is an impracticable form of uniformity that cannot be imposed on the people of a country with diverse backgrounds.
After a detailed analysis and well-substantiated arguments in his book titled “Uniform Civil Code, A Critical Study”, the late Padma Bhushan Maulana Wahiduddin Khan, rightly concludes that Article 44 of the Constitution has no legal meaningfulness or ethical
value. It was just a piece of imagination by certain minds. It should be eliminated from the constitution just as the useless appendix may be removed from the human body by means of an operation when it proves inimical to good health.
Mr. Golwalkar’s views on UCC are worth noting here. He remarked: “Nature abhors uniformity, which is the death-knell of nations. I’m all for the protection of various ways of life, but variety must supplement the nation’s unity and not range itself against it.”
Of course muslim men don't want to leave privileges of course will not like it😅
Godi media 🤡☕
No this Indian media... Check your 🧠🧠.
Sab wife women kaliya he ha a desh Mae... Men toh insaan he nhi ha
Jai Sri Ram