He explains the situation were in with such clarity. I am encouraged to continue to do as much as I can personally and to continue voting for leaders who recognize the problem and work toward solutions.
1:42 " 7.2 billion people we" ?! It's close to 8 billion. Set to touch 12 by 2050. Infinite growth is not possible on a finite planet. Overshoot always leads to collapse.
Perhaps he should consider US three-letter agencies being more responsible for the Syrian civil war than a drought, and who’s to say extreme weather events aren’t at least in part a result of weather engineering.
No problem in problem in principle with the concept of planetary limits. Many have tried to quantify the limits. And all have failed. This signifies that so far the concept of planetary limits on humankind is philosophical rather than scientific. And thus more likely derived from personal worldview, whether pessimistic or optimistic.
He explains the situation were in with such clarity. I am encouraged to continue to do as much as I can personally and to continue voting for leaders who recognize the problem and work toward solutions.
1:42 " 7.2 billion people we" ?! It's close to 8 billion. Set to touch 12 by 2050. Infinite growth is not possible on a finite planet.
Overshoot always leads to collapse.
Nice slide show, great graphs... now what are you going to do to reduce human population?.
Way he said albedo was one of the most swedish ways of saying it haha
Perhaps he should consider US three-letter agencies being more responsible for the Syrian civil war than a drought, and who’s to say extreme weather events aren’t at least in part a result of weather engineering.
No problem in problem in principle with the concept of planetary limits. Many have tried to quantify the limits. And all have failed. This signifies that so far the concept of planetary limits on humankind is philosophical rather than scientific. And thus more likely derived from personal worldview, whether pessimistic or optimistic.