Well, I'd probably invite Sagan, Feynman, Einstein, Riemann, Maxwell, Turing, Marić, Hilbert, Joplin, Faithful, Newton, Kepler (but they didn't like parties), Galileo (but he was under house arrest), Hendrix, Holiday, Beck, Bowie, Watts, Dawkins, Ward, Darwin, Adams (he can take pictures), Leone, Eastwood, Swift and Franklin (but not Watson or Crick). However, I can't see any of them accepting my invitation, as I'm not a popularist scientist with a cheeky grin or on the BBC making documentaries. So, it's a bit of a pointless question really, thanks for asking. (Oh yeah, almost forgot, Stephen Hawking would be the guest of honour.)
Thomas Jefferson - On the Virginia Statute for Religious Freedom Dwight Eisenhower - On the eve of D-Day Florence Nightingale - On being accepted as a statistician Charles Darwin - On the decision to publish Origin of Species Galileo Galilei - On his observations of the moon and Jupiter Neanderthal man - Did he find homo Sapiens chicks attractive?
Passionate, modest, smart, funny. Gotta love Brian Cox. I've went to his conference in Bucharest this year and it was wonderful. Only Brian Cox could invite L.U.C.A to a party and it's a brilliant idea! 😊
It was Richard P. Feynman who said, as a scientist, *"We never are definitely right, we can only be sure we are wrong."* I'm very surprised you didn't mention him in your jolly little jaunt through the growing up of a young Cox at the dinning table. Well done.
I would be if every Segway I ever did involved a new holiday on a different continent to say billion billion billion billion miles away every single episode. It’s a good gig
I have always loved the Brits. For a long time I assumed all of you were inherently smarter than Americans. But now that I’m older and know that assumption isn’t necessarily accurate, I still find myself awed. I think it’s to do with what seems like a humility so few Americans have or at least communicate. “I don’t know,” is okay. Lovely man, lovely culture. Thank you for being who you are!
My hobby is space travel and especially on YT I come across people who shout that the moon landing (yes almost always in the singular) was fake. Then I answer that if big names from science like Brian Cox, Stephen Hawking and Carl Sagan would say that it was demonstrably fake I would believe it. But they never said this.
Good for you! That's the sort of critical thinking we need nowadays. Although, I would've put Carl Sagan as first in your list of inspirational thinkers. Anyhow, we don't really need anyone else to tell if something is true or not. We now have the evidence of our own eyes to establish the facts. There are high resolution images of the moon's surface that clearly show the tracks of the moon buggy and the eagle lander. Unless someone can demonstrably prove they're also fake. They are the ones making the extraordinary claim, so they require the extraordinary evidence, as Carl would say. Thanks
We can all take frequent trips through the Milky Way together. In Carl Sagan's "Ship of the Imagination" which happened to be shaped like a dandelion seed.
“ In the old Persian story, a vizier renowned for his wisdom is asked which is more useful, the Sun or the Moon. “The Moon,” he answers, “because the Sun shines in daytime when it’s light out anyway.” •Pale Blue Dot
The Russian KGB knew that the landings were genuine. Russia lost the race to the moon, if they could have shouted fake they would have. Also, if the technology to create a believable hoax existed at the time, the Russians would also have landed.
They are similar, and one was born from the other, but they are now very different fields of study. Astrology is not real science, it's more about fortune-telling and horoscopes. It is not based on any empirical evidence. You're thinking of Cosmology and Cosmologists, which is the scientific study of the Universe, and our place within. It is based on the scientific method and empirical evidence. Carl Sagan was a cosmologist and an excellent communicator of science on television. I highly recommend you look at his cosmos series. Take care and have a nice day!
My aunt bought me a book by Brian Cox for Christmas knowing i was a fan and enjoyed his books ans shows. Unfortunately she had bought me the autobiography of the actor.
PREACH about Kepler. He was a devout Protestant Christian. He lost EVERYTHING because despite his firm belief that the Earth was at the center of the universe, all the evidence showed he was wrong. WE were wrong. And he lost everything, his wife, his family, his home because truth, fact, science, evidence was more important than "belief". Johannes Kepler was, and is, one of the greatest and least appreciated scientists of the world (IHO).
Wondering why they didn't put any makeup on Brian's face to stop it shining under the lights. He looks like Dave Lister in the Rimmer song from Red Dwarf.
Isaac Newton, for sure. Our world, the world we live in day to day, operates on Newtonian principles rather than quantum principles. So it would be fascinating to point out to Newton ways the understanding of his laws has led to things like jet aircraft and rockets [Equal and opposite reaction] - and even the game of snooker! Capt James Cook, the supreme marine navigator and surveyor. It was only in the mid 1990's that satellite imaging was able to produce marine charts of the waters around N.Z. that were more accurate than the charts produced by Cook's surveys, in the mid 1700's. Jimi Hendrix was into sci-fi. On his first album is a track "Third Stone From The Sun" and on Electric Ladyland, along with the spacy track "A Merman I Should Turn to Be" is the line in "Voodoo Chile" '..took me to the outskirts of infinity'. The concept of 'the outskirts of infinity' is redolent of black holes and he would be fascinated to talk about them to my final guest - Prof Cox himself, to keep order and direct the inevitable uproar.
The Solar System series was/is wonderful but the music .... so intrusive. In fact, music tracks have become the blight of most/all natural world/science programmes. There's a marimba tonking away behind Prof Cox's replies on this video. Entirely unneccessary and distracting. There are even music tracks on news reportage clips! One day a producer will have the courage to dispense with music tracks. Bring it on.
Dear Brian Cox: Your Humor, being so funny, and being a scientist also has always made me laugh, So I chose to share only with you my theory of gravity which is very unique, and nothing at all like any theory Ive ever read or heard, I believe all the theories are very wrong although Newtons laws would actually still apply, the real gravity force is very easy to explain and I hope you read this and think really hard before you dismiss, please, my theory is this. Gravity is not a force per say, its a flow being exactly like an inhale of oxygen or food in a constant absorbing rate of dark mater and energy from the surrounding universe consumed by Mass, the larger the Mass (dense) the more powerful the hunger, stronger flow = stronger gravity, all matter has gravity because the quantum particles eat, our sun or moon consumes energy from the universe, gravity is just the flow of energy (food) for the quantum world, the atoms (any quantum particle) must utilize with its metabolism an absorption flow (gravity), particles then exhale energy not needed (radiation). (small example The sun eats dark matter an amount of energy in such mass quantity from every direction of course that it traps the earth in the flow of dark matter headed to the sun for consumption and we are doing the same and our flow of consumption traps the moon), if we could detect dark matter then we could possible detect a Doppler type spectrum of this flow, this easily could be another explanation of gravity lenses and why galaxies are flat, large spinning matter absorbs more dark matter more readily at the poles to cause the flat disk appearance firstly a result of centrifugal force (in other words the galaxies consume more from the top and bottom causing them to flatten), atoms eat and they eat a lot of dark matter ! at this point no one knows where atoms, quarks etc. get there energy which is quite a lot of energy, and storage must be massive as the strong force would suggest around the nucleus, energy stored must be enormous if considering the explosion when they are split or forced apart. I believed I have solved the mystery of Gravity, by the way I'm a civil engineer by trade in the U.S. I hope you can give feedback. Thank you for your attention in advance.
Why are you under the impression that Brian actually reads any of these comments? He's only interested in the cheque at the end of the day. Have you thought about using the concept of paragraphs in your writing, as it makes it easier to read when faced with a wall of endless text? Why not write up your theory, with the supported mathematical analysis and submit it to recognised peer review body? As to your theory, then in my humble opinion. It has some merit. Although, I can't see anything that hasn't already been investigated under our present understanding of gravitation and inertia. Good luck.
1. no way I'm subscribing after a manipulative title like that even despite it being a joke about the conversation at the end of this video. 2. what is going on with that background music and its volume
Not necessarily.. one may have said the same thing about air travel 100 years ago, it would have been unfathomable that you could fly around Europe for £30.
@@ghopkins66 yes but think of the grand scale of things a 10 year old today. Cost of living and everything else. The expenses a trip to space compared to a normal flight. We'll never be able to reasonably afford it. Even in a kids lifetime. Hyperinflation you name it, just imagine.
Can't you read anything other than sans-serif fonts? "Unreadable" is either an enormous exaggeration or you desperately need glasses (or perhaps not sit 30 feet from your laptop 😁)
"The whole universe constructed by a programmer" is trivially false. Imagine you want to simulate just 1 particle you can either just get that particle or you 'simulate' it which takes more than 1 particle to do (think how many electrons are needed to store a structure in memory or do any kind of calculations our Electron record is going to need more than 1 electron, and if it didn't if you could store the state, position and momentum for an electron using an electron that's not a simulation at all is it? That's the actual universe with that electron in it with its actual state etc) Therefore your 'simulation' either isn't a simulation at all (it's just a universe of particles arranged like we have now) or you need more matter than is in the universe to be able to simulate the universe. From that it follows that it would be easier to create a universe than it would be to simulate one. Same with any subset of that universe - it's far easier to make a cup of tea than to write a program that would simulate the trillions and trillions of particles in a cup of tea and all their interactions. So, just put the kettle on and be assured that the guy who wrote the 'we're in a simulation' paper (a) Was clueless about pretty much every topic he hit upon in it and (b) Hadn't actually thought about it for more than 30 seconds.
Understanding time is essential to understanding relativity. All motion is relative. When we described motion, we do so as a function of time. For us believing physicists, the distinction between the past, present and future is but a stubborn illusion. Time is not absolute. With all due respect, Albert Einstein was a far superior Physicist, than Brian Cox. Like learning how to understand Physics may seem like eternity for you, but for some it's elementary and instantly gratifying. And speaking truthfully sir, your mere presence spoils my respect for the future of Prussian Mathematics, and I'm not saying we live in a simulation. Keep laughing, it's all fun and games.
Stop glossing over the equations! when Brian was writing out the chemical equation for sugar and sulphuric acid, that should have been shown on screen. It wouldn't have "scared" anyone, and would have demonstrated to kids doing STEM that what they're learning in school is real and valuable. Obscuring it was a pointless, silly bit of dumbing down. #showyourworkingout
Are there any good videos of the manned lunar landing sites that clearly show the landers and other equipment left behind? I'd like to think subsequent, unmanned trips to the moon would have taken such footage, but I can't locate any.
Photos of the Apollo landing sites were taken by the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO), the Chinese lunar satellite Chang'e 2 the Indian lunar satellite Chandrayaan-2 the South Korea’s Danuri probe and the Japanese SELENE lunar probe.
"do you think man will ever land on rhe sun? "n-no, the sun is too hot. it is not a good place to go." "what about in the wintertime when the sun is cold?" "....the sun is not cold in the winter"
It all becomes a matter of definitions, I suppose... But a dream is internally generated where a simulation would be externally imposed, perhaps? But in a sense the stimuli of a dream must use the same (or some of the same? psychologists or neuroscientists, please help me out) neural functions as conscious experience - so in that sense they wouldn't be so different. Another angle could be to pose that there is no difference, provided we live in a simulation. If we don't, dreams are not simulations, if we do they are - because everything is or isn't depending on wether we do or don't. Basically, the question is fundamentally contingent on the basic premis. [Guru meditation. Syntax error.]
@@ApolloKid1961 It is obviously harder go to the moon than making film set. I would like to believe it was real but it does not make logical sense. I don't believe it will happen any time soon either, ya'll been duped by Hollywood and its more and more obvious as time passes.
@@ApolloKid1961 I'm just saying it's too difficult to go to the moon here and now in this reality and I don't think its happening any time soon. But they do make good movies in Holllywood.
@@batridge_munkey167 You don't have the knowledge about whether or not it is possible to go to the moon, then or now. So that's why your statement is I don't get it so it must have been made in Hollywood. The fact is that people landed on the moon 6 times and that the USSR did have the possibilities to determine whether this really happened or not. Take any search engine and look how many non-American moon satellites took pictures of the Apollo moon landings.
@@ApolloKid1961 not then no, but now yes because it's not happening and that's what they say as far as I've seen and heard on the subject. I also think USA and RUSSIA are in a strategic military pact.
Their simulators are simulating them and their simulators are simulating them and their simulators are simulating them and their simulators are simulating them and their simulators are simulating them and their simulators are simulating them and their simulators are simulating them and their simulators are simulating them and their simulators are simulating them
I believe we went to the moon, but I also believe something strange happened there. Neil Armstrong before and after are like totally different people. Maybe the spaceship that’s embedded into the surface for millions of years has something to do with this
He literally said on Joe Rogan were in an simulation made by wormhole created by quantum computers😂....okay, he never said were in an simulation but he said its looks very similar and it's an exciting new branch of science 😊
Hello Mr. Brian Cox, your oppinion of God , please ,keep to yourself ,so you do not fall like those who seem to want to show that they know everything ,just because they have a degree. slow down ,and just do more thinking and less talking to feed your EGO. be well.
Who would your dream dinner party be with?
Well, I'd probably invite Sagan, Feynman, Einstein, Riemann, Maxwell, Turing, Marić, Hilbert, Joplin, Faithful, Newton, Kepler (but they didn't like parties), Galileo (but he was under house arrest), Hendrix, Holiday, Beck, Bowie, Watts, Dawkins, Ward, Darwin, Adams (he can take pictures), Leone, Eastwood, Swift and Franklin (but not Watson or Crick). However, I can't see any of them accepting my invitation, as I'm not a popularist scientist with a cheeky grin or on the BBC making documentaries. So, it's a bit of a pointless question really, thanks for asking.
(Oh yeah, almost forgot, Stephen Hawking would be the guest of honour.)
Thomas Jefferson - On the Virginia Statute for Religious Freedom
Dwight Eisenhower - On the eve of D-Day
Florence Nightingale - On being accepted as a statistician
Charles Darwin - On the decision to publish Origin of Species
Galileo Galilei - On his observations of the moon and Jupiter
Neanderthal man - Did he find homo Sapiens chicks attractive?
With a philosopher who knew nothing.
Since this channel is posting old (James may glue from 2013) and maybe new video's:
How old is this? And can dinner guests from the future be added?
Feynman, Einstein & Sagan..
I would pay to see Brian Cox v Brian Cox skit. That is untapped comedy gold.
?? He has most definitely aged.
This man is an absolute treasure. He's responsible for so much of my passion for physics.
Turn the bloody music down!
It doesn't sound too loud to me
@@hand587shh
It's mixed for idiots to play in public without headphones
How about a nice friendly ‘pretty please’?
😀😀😀...now you've made me notice it..🤔
Love Brian Cox…would appreciate seeing much more from him!
I wish he would quit the stupid science thing and just become a vtuber
@tammyscott9664
tons of videos on yt
Glad you enjoyed it, Tammy!
@@BBCEarthScience timmah
Passionate, modest, smart, funny. Gotta love Brian Cox. I've went to his conference in Bucharest this year and it was wonderful. Only Brian Cox could invite L.U.C.A to a party and it's a brilliant idea! 😊
It was Richard P. Feynman who said, as a scientist, *"We never are definitely right, we can only be sure we are wrong."* I'm very surprised you didn't mention him in your jolly little jaunt through the growing up of a young Cox at the dinning table. Well done.
You’re the man BC! 🫡 🇺🇸 🇬🇧
So why doesn't he age ?
Botox
Wibbly wobbly, timey wimey
He’s entered a black hole and gone to the end of time
@@TheToxicWaltz121 I also see some fillers
I actually think he looks charmingly his age here. He's healthy. He's not on drugs like the average schmo.
Dare to D:REAM - says it all really 😃 - thanks for sharing Brian
Glad you enjoyed the video!
Prof. Brian Cox is such an inspiration for me, even though I'm not a physics-y person myself.
So excited about the new series! Can’t wait! Love Brian Cox (the physicist, and the other guy too i suppose)!
Christopher Nolan is such an insanely clever answer 🤣 man's a genius in every way
Love this guys so much. One of the more charming interviews, thank you.
Hes so happy
I would be if every Segway I ever did involved a new holiday on a different continent to say billion billion billion billion miles away every single episode.
It’s a good gig
Brian Rocks!
I have always loved the Brits. For a long time I assumed all of you were inherently smarter than Americans. But now that I’m older and know that assumption isn’t necessarily accurate, I still find myself awed. I think it’s to do with what seems like a humility so few Americans have or at least communicate. “I don’t know,” is okay. Lovely man, lovely culture. Thank you for being who you are!
My hobby is space travel and especially on YT I come across people who shout that the moon landing (yes almost always in the singular) was fake. Then I answer that if big names from science like Brian Cox, Stephen Hawking and Carl Sagan would say that it was demonstrably fake I would believe it. But they never said this.
Good for you! That's the sort of critical thinking we need nowadays. Although, I would've put Carl Sagan as first in your list of inspirational thinkers. Anyhow, we don't really need anyone else to tell if something is true or not. We now have the evidence of our own eyes to establish the facts. There are high resolution images of the moon's surface that clearly show the tracks of the moon buggy and the eagle lander.
Unless someone can demonstrably prove they're also fake. They are the ones making the extraordinary claim, so they require the extraordinary evidence, as Carl would say. Thanks
"My hobby is space travel" is amazing phrasing it sounds like you just take frequent trips through the Milky Way
We can all take frequent trips through the Milky Way together. In Carl Sagan's "Ship of the Imagination" which happened to be shaped like a dandelion seed.
“ In the old Persian story, a vizier renowned for his wisdom is asked which is more useful, the Sun or the Moon. “The Moon,” he answers, “because the Sun shines in daytime when it’s light out anyway.”
•Pale Blue Dot
The Russian KGB knew that the landings were genuine. Russia lost the race to the moon, if they could have shouted fake they would have.
Also, if the technology to create a believable hoax existed at the time, the Russians would also have landed.
I love this guy
Imagine a space movie filmed on location
We might see it happen sooner than we think
Brian: "Why would you want to go beyond that?"
Me: "Why *wouldn't* you?"
"We think.." love him
Keep sharing ur inspiration to other kids around the world. ^^
Brian completely rizzed up the interviewer
8:51 what does he mean by "it makes an appearance in the solar system"
This interview is about his new series, "The Solar System".
The background music is not the one
Yeah no, One would be such a mismatch here.
@jarnolehtinen2269 I agree, a complete mismatch. I was simply pointing out that it wasn't the one.
@@marshmuti I was joking. Metallica: One 😁🙏
3:18 Mads Mikkelsen. A young Mads Mikkelsen. All day, mate.
The thumbnail looks like Brian is holding a light saber...
Thought the same😂
That his musical career goes from Dare to D:REAM is other worldly.
So, how are you, Luca?
LUCA: Exists...
Everything's good, take your time!
Brian inside the box !
Legend of a man.
Brian Cox makes me want to study Astrology 🖖
we need more stience computicators on television
Astrology isn’t science. Do you mean Astro physics?
@ I'm quite sure it's Astrology, the Astrologers unlock the secrets of the universe
They are similar, and one was born from the other, but they are now very different fields of study. Astrology is not real science, it's more about fortune-telling and horoscopes. It is not based on any empirical evidence. You're thinking of Cosmology and Cosmologists, which is the scientific study of the Universe, and our place within. It is based on the scientific method and empirical evidence. Carl Sagan was a cosmologist and an excellent communicator of science on television. I highly recommend you look at his cosmos series. Take care and have a nice day!
I was today years old when I learned Brian Cox was in D-Ream.
My aunt bought me a book by Brian Cox for Christmas knowing i was a fan and enjoyed his books ans shows. Unfortunately she had bought me the autobiography of the actor.
We need an old school Cox fight.
7:19 Schrödinger: "Nice"
God damn it, if not Rogan than the bloody music! 😂
"We have eviden..... Ah, HA!"
Why did you put the plinky-plonky music on it??
Love the question and answer to, who would direct the moon landing.
What the astrophysicist meant to say is the best analogy for the universe is a quantum computer.
What watch is he wearing?
Pretty sure that the next science documentary series the BBC do with Brian will be filmed on the Moon.
We should somehow get Chris Nolan to film a film epic on the actual moon. Maybe the film adaptation of Andy Weir's Artemis.
That would be something.
PREACH about Kepler.
He was a devout Protestant Christian. He lost EVERYTHING because despite his firm belief that the Earth was at the center of the universe, all the evidence showed he was wrong. WE were wrong. And he lost everything, his wife, his family, his home because truth, fact, science, evidence was more important than "belief". Johannes Kepler was, and is, one of the greatest and least appreciated scientists of the world (IHO).
Love the giggles ftom the background!😅
Indeed, being wrong means you are nearer to the answer...
Wondering why they didn't put any makeup on Brian's face to stop it shining under the lights. He looks like Dave Lister in the Rimmer song from Red Dwarf.
Isaac Newton, for sure. Our world, the world we live in day to day, operates on Newtonian principles rather than quantum principles. So it would be fascinating to point out to Newton ways the understanding of his laws has led to things like jet aircraft and rockets [Equal and opposite reaction] - and even the game of snooker!
Capt James Cook, the supreme marine navigator and surveyor. It was only in the mid 1990's that satellite imaging was able to produce marine charts of the waters around N.Z. that were more accurate than the charts produced by Cook's surveys, in the mid 1700's.
Jimi Hendrix was into sci-fi. On his first album is a track "Third Stone From The Sun" and on Electric Ladyland, along with the spacy track "A Merman I Should Turn to Be" is the line in "Voodoo Chile" '..took me to the outskirts of infinity'. The concept of 'the outskirts of infinity' is redolent of black holes and he would be fascinated to talk about them to my final guest - Prof Cox himself, to keep order and direct the inevitable uproar.
Why is this guy all over UA-cam all of a sudden
I’d like to see what a Quentin Tarantino version of the moon landing looks like
It will involve a foot
BRIAN!!!
I made a video on the connection to our universe and Blackholes.
Anyone reading this help me get Brian to watch it plz.
So, if I understood it correctly, then the black holes are just massive recycling machines 🤔
cogito ergo sum? there is no real way to know. Descartes was right, there are only thoughts or awareness.
The Solar System series was/is wonderful but the music .... so intrusive. In fact, music tracks have become the blight of most/all natural world/science programmes. There's a marimba tonking away behind Prof Cox's replies on this video. Entirely unneccessary and distracting. There are even music tracks on news reportage clips! One day a producer will have the courage to dispense with music tracks. Bring it on.
I guessed Einstein & Bowie haha
Dear Brian Cox:
Your Humor, being so funny, and being a scientist also has always made me laugh, So I chose to share only with you my theory of gravity which is very unique, and nothing at all like any theory Ive ever read or heard, I believe all the theories are very wrong although Newtons laws would actually still apply, the real gravity force is very easy to explain and I hope you read this and think really hard before you dismiss, please, my theory is this. Gravity is not a force per say, its a flow being exactly like an inhale of oxygen or food in a constant absorbing rate of dark mater and energy from the surrounding universe consumed by Mass, the larger the Mass (dense) the more powerful the hunger, stronger flow = stronger gravity, all matter has gravity because the quantum particles eat, our sun or moon consumes energy from the universe, gravity is just the flow of energy (food) for the quantum world, the atoms (any quantum particle) must utilize with its metabolism an absorption flow (gravity), particles then exhale energy not needed (radiation). (small example The sun eats dark matter an amount of energy in such mass quantity from every direction of course that it traps the earth in the flow of dark matter headed to the sun for consumption and we are doing the same and our flow of consumption traps the moon), if we could detect dark matter then we could possible detect a Doppler type spectrum of this flow, this easily could be another explanation of gravity lenses and why galaxies are flat, large spinning matter absorbs more dark matter more readily at the poles to cause the flat disk appearance firstly a result of centrifugal force (in other words the galaxies consume more from the top and bottom causing them to flatten), atoms eat and they eat a lot of dark matter ! at this point no one knows where atoms, quarks etc. get there energy which is quite a lot of energy, and storage must be massive as the strong force would suggest around the nucleus, energy stored must be enormous if considering the explosion when they are split or forced apart. I believed I have solved the mystery of Gravity, by the way I'm a civil engineer by trade in the U.S. I hope you can give feedback.
Thank you for your attention in advance.
Why are you under the impression that Brian actually reads any of these comments? He's only interested in the cheque at the end of the day.
Have you thought about using the concept of paragraphs in your writing, as it makes it easier to read when faced with a wall of endless text?
Why not write up your theory, with the supported mathematical analysis and submit it to recognised peer review body?
As to your theory, then in my humble opinion. It has some merit. Although, I can't see anything that hasn't already been investigated under our present understanding of gravitation and inertia.
Good luck.
The universe is a quantum physics programme 😄✌️❤️🇬🇧
1. no way I'm subscribing after a manipulative title like that even despite it being a joke about the conversation at the end of this video.
2. what is going on with that background music and its volume
If you're 10 years old watching this. Dont forget! You'll have to be incredibly rich.
Not necessarily.. one may have said the same thing about air travel 100 years ago, it would have been unfathomable that you could fly around Europe for £30.
@@ghopkins66 yes but think of the grand scale of things a 10 year old today. Cost of living and everything else. The expenses a trip to space compared to a normal flight. We'll never be able to reasonably afford it. Even in a kids lifetime. Hyperinflation you name it, just imagine.
I think money will become incredibly de-valued at some point. “Money” will turn into Energy tokens
Keanue Reeves should play Brian Cox in a movie
Is this a official video came from BBC? I don’t believe they use the unreadable font for questions.
Can't you read anything other than sans-serif fonts? "Unreadable" is either an enormous exaggeration or you desperately need glasses (or perhaps not sit 30 feet from your laptop 😁)
I could read it just fine. And I'm not even British.
@@paulford9120 same here, I'm an old Swedish bloke with somewhat impaired vision 😁
He doesn't think he can beat Brian Cox, the actor in a fight ?!? The dude's like 90. Dance around him for 20 seconds then kick him in the junk. 🤔
😂 made me laugh...think he was just being respectful lol
😆😆😆
"The whole universe constructed by a programmer" is trivially false. Imagine you want to simulate just 1 particle you can either just get that particle or you 'simulate' it which takes more than 1 particle to do (think how many electrons are needed to store a structure in memory or do any kind of calculations our Electron record is going to need more than 1 electron, and if it didn't if you could store the state, position and momentum for an electron using an electron that's not a simulation at all is it? That's the actual universe with that electron in it with its actual state etc) Therefore your 'simulation' either isn't a simulation at all (it's just a universe of particles arranged like we have now) or you need more matter than is in the universe to be able to simulate the universe. From that it follows that it would be easier to create a universe than it would be to simulate one. Same with any subset of that universe - it's far easier to make a cup of tea than to write a program that would simulate the trillions and trillions of particles in a cup of tea and all their interactions. So, just put the kettle on and be assured that the guy who wrote the 'we're in a simulation' paper (a) Was clueless about pretty much every topic he hit upon in it and (b) Hadn't actually thought about it for more than 30 seconds.
Understanding time is essential to understanding relativity. All motion is relative. When we described motion, we do so as a function of time. For us believing physicists, the distinction between the past, present and future is but a stubborn illusion. Time is not absolute.
With all due respect, Albert Einstein was a far superior Physicist, than Brian Cox. Like learning how to understand Physics may seem like eternity for you, but for some it's elementary and instantly gratifying.
And speaking truthfully sir, your mere presence spoils my respect for the future of Prussian Mathematics, and I'm not saying we live in a simulation. Keep laughing, it's all fun and games.
Stop glossing over the equations! when Brian was writing out the chemical equation for sugar and sulphuric acid, that should have been shown on screen. It wouldn't have "scared" anyone, and would have demonstrated to kids doing STEM that what they're learning in school is real and valuable. Obscuring it was a pointless, silly bit of dumbing down. #showyourworkingout
Can't understand them over the music.
Are there any good videos of the manned lunar landing sites that clearly show the landers and other equipment left behind? I'd like to think subsequent, unmanned trips to the moon would have taken such footage, but I can't locate any.
Photos of the Apollo landing sites were taken by the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO), the Chinese lunar satellite Chang'e 2 the Indian lunar satellite Chandrayaan-2 the South Korea’s Danuri probe and the Japanese SELENE lunar probe.
Keanu Reeves Twin Brother ?
If everything is a simulation, what is it simulating?
I gave up. The 'music'! What was it for?
He repeats what text books tell him
Who do you think writes the textbooks?
@ people’s theories
@@danielson6002 scientific theories are not just ideas and textbooks are written based on observation and experimentation
So we are in a simulation
So, you're not not saying?
It's Muse. Simulation Theory
I know that's Brian's real hair but why does it look like it isn't?
"do you think man will ever land on rhe sun?
"n-no, the sun is too hot. it is not a good place to go."
"what about in the wintertime when the sun is cold?"
"....the sun is not cold in the winter"
Brian would be my D:Ream dinner party guest
I want to leave, where is the exit
If I am all protein.
Isn't the expression of the proteins around me an extension of me ?!
#ask any question possible .
whats the difference between a simulation and a dream?
in a simulation every character can have their own individual dream; in a dream, you're the only one watching/experiencing that dream
It all becomes a matter of definitions, I suppose... But a dream is internally generated where a simulation would be externally imposed, perhaps? But in a sense the stimuli of a dream must use the same (or some of the same? psychologists or neuroscientists, please help me out) neural functions as conscious experience - so in that sense they wouldn't be so different.
Another angle could be to pose that there is no difference, provided we live in a simulation. If we don't, dreams are not simulations, if we do they are - because everything is or isn't depending on wether we do or don't.
Basically, the question is fundamentally contingent on the basic premis.
[Guru meditation. Syntax error.]
I can simulate a car crash with 2 toy cars...
@@bastiaan7777777 are you and the cars in a dream?
@@jaydenhardingArtist Everything is a dream.
U kno them people whos smile is too big for there head?
What's up with this music?
Smelly questions
I did not know you were in a band called dare. Were gorillaz singing about you?
that Brain Cox exists at all proves we are in a simulation.
He is an alien
Nah... He's a keyboard player... Even weirder..
i don't think anyone has been on the moon either
If you want attention, go to your mother.
@@ApolloKid1961 It is obviously harder go to the moon than making film set. I would like to believe it was real but it does not make logical sense. I don't believe it will happen any time soon either, ya'll been duped by Hollywood and its more and more obvious as time passes.
@@ApolloKid1961 I'm just saying it's too difficult to go to the moon here and now in this reality and I don't think its happening any time soon. But they do make good movies in Holllywood.
@@batridge_munkey167 You don't have the knowledge about whether or not it is possible to go to the moon, then or now. So that's why your statement is I don't get it so it must have been made in Hollywood. The fact is that people landed on the moon 6 times and that the USSR did have the possibilities to determine whether this really happened or not. Take any search engine and look how many non-American moon satellites took pictures of the Apollo moon landings.
@@ApolloKid1961 not then no, but now yes because it's not happening and that's what they say as far as I've seen and heard on the subject. I also think USA and RUSSIA are in a strategic military pact.
This seems like a celebrity interview rather than a science education interview. So, which were you actually trying to go for?
whos simulating the simulators?
And are they also in a simulation while simulating the simulators of the simulation?
The simulator has no beginning, therefore cannot be in a simulation Himself
Holoturtles all the way down, I'm afraid.
Their simulators are simulating them and their simulators are simulating them and their simulators are simulating them and their simulators are simulating them and their simulators are simulating them and their simulators are simulating them and their simulators are simulating them and their simulators are simulating them and their simulators are simulating them
Greg
I believe we went to the moon, but I also believe something strange happened there.
Neil Armstrong before and after are like totally different people.
Maybe the spaceship that’s embedded into the surface for millions of years has something to do with this
This is awful. You've got Mace Windu and Obi-Wan Kenobi right there and you cut them out of the frame? Who does that? 🤦♀🤣
He literally said on Joe Rogan were in an simulation made by wormhole created by quantum computers😂....okay, he never said were in an simulation but he said its looks very similar and it's an exciting new branch of science 😊
Getting almost impossible to not agree with simulation theory now
Stop that annoying background music. Beyond irritating
👉text Bhagavad-gita 🕵️🧠
Hello Mr. Brian Cox, your oppinion of God , please ,keep to yourself ,so you do not fall like those who seem to want to show that they know everything ,just because they have a degree. slow down ,and just do more thinking and less talking to feed your EGO. be well.
Slowly but surely they're all admitting, that everything all seems a bit too simulated 😊
So he's basically saying we live in a simulation.
What would be the difference between a simulation and a reality? Who knows, maybe it was that dmt