FRM: Basel internal ratings-based (IRB) risk weight function

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 9 вер 2024
  • Basel's IRB determines a capital charge (K) = Credit Value at Risk (CVaR) @ 99.9% – Expected Loss (UL). This function is estimating an unexpected loss (UL). For more financial risk videos, visit our website! www.bionicturtl...

КОМЕНТАРІ • 21

  • @alexandresynadino1071
    @alexandresynadino1071 5 років тому +1

    You are the best Risk management teacher I have ever encountered ! I owe you several exam passes

    • @bionicturtle
      @bionicturtle  5 років тому

      Thank you so much for your kind words! I really appreciate your support.

  • @pintomat
    @pintomat 9 років тому +3

    I was seeking for good literature about CVaR and i have to say, that this lecture helped me alot understand better how do calculate the CVaR. Thank you very much.

  • @foreverlbb
    @foreverlbb 10 років тому +2

    I agree with Minh Bui, the formula that used to calculate capital requirement in Excel is not the same it shows on the K formula. The formula that is the same as the box should be =EAD*LGD*((NORMSDIST((NORMSINV(PD)+rho^0.5*NORMSINV(CL))/(1-rho)^0.5))-PD)*MaturityAdj. But they have the same result. Thanks so much for the lecture, it is so helpful to understand this subject!

  • @rediromasuperstar
    @rediromasuperstar 13 років тому

    Yes. I agree with the former comment. The maturity adjustment formula is a bit puzzling. What does b mean there?

  • @bionicturtle
    @bionicturtle  12 років тому

    I doubt it (as the excel XLS has survived several FRM seasons). More likely i think is simply that the formula itself is a non-trivial copula. But if you want to share the specific discrepancy, i can try to address it, thanks,

  • @Longpan898
    @Longpan898 12 років тому

    Thanks, I had missed this one!

  • @usminhbui
    @usminhbui 12 років тому

    actually I was wrong about what I said above. btw I still think you are not right about the Maturity Adjustment
    and for people, b(PD)=[ (0.11852-0.05478*ln(PD) ]^2
    I think for the Maturity Adjustment, the top should be 1+(M-2.5)*b(PD)

  • @deltatrading8317
    @deltatrading8317 5 років тому +1

    Good Afternoon Mr Harper,
    Thx for the content, why in the excel cell you did not multiply the PD by LGD ? You only put - PD why ?
    In advance thx

  • @amitgala3804
    @amitgala3804 9 років тому

    Excellent Explanation

  • @bestseller24987
    @bestseller24987 9 років тому

    What u explained so far was quite intuitive except for maturity adjustment. Could u explain more?

  • @kapitankorporacja
    @kapitankorporacja 12 років тому

    dksieunhan: I think you are right, but in the excel formula the pattern is as You wrote;) I just checked it seems ok.

  • @iDionysus1
    @iDionysus1 4 роки тому

    Thanks man!

  • @yasmeena7986
    @yasmeena7986 3 роки тому

    Ok, once capital is calculated and set aside. In what form the capital will be held, is it in cash form or any other highly liquid assets?

  • @lerat72
    @lerat72 2 роки тому +1

    Hello David.
    Thank you for the video. Very helpful.
    I made some calculations which are almost the same as yours.
    I took your 18% (ro) to have the same hypothesis as yours.
    Even if the calculation of this correlation factor is to be calculated and if a bit different (I took the formulas from the BIS website). Banque des règlements internationaux (BRI) in french.
    My point is that the K (capital requirement)
    I found K is 9000 lower than yours.
    9000 Which is the EL (Expected Loss).
    I do not see why we have this difference.
    According to the formula of K, the result should be $128k. Not 137…
    Can you please help me to understand ?

    • @Carljin-ym2ot
      @Carljin-ym2ot Рік тому

      same, i also calculate the K by using the BIS formula and I also find the difference
      I wonder whether you figured out whether this difference happened?

  • @usminhbui
    @usminhbui 12 років тому

    I have a trouble of seeing the similarity between the function you wrote and the excel calculation when you highlighted it. Is that a mistake of calculation from you?

  • @rahulagarwal9629
    @rahulagarwal9629 6 років тому

    Why cap req added UL to EL. It should be UL-EL right?

    • @bionicturtle
      @bionicturtle  6 років тому

      UL - EL isn't meaningful. Capital covers UL (and presumes EL is covered as an expense; ie, in product pricing). "Absolute CVaR" = UL + EL, and CVaR (aka, relative VaR) = UL.

  • @usminhbui
    @usminhbui 12 років тому

    can you see my second comment below, I think it is the only problem. thank you!

  • @kapitankorporacja
    @kapitankorporacja 12 років тому

    Wzorki do excela dla polaków ;):Unexpectedloss =((B3*((ROZKŁAD.NORMALNY.S(((1/(1-B8))^0,5*ROZKŁAD.NORMALNY.S.ODW(B2)+(B8/(1-B8))^0,5*ROZKŁAD.NORMALNY.S.ODW(B10)))))-B2*B3)*B11)*B4, Maturity =(1+(B5-2,5)*((0,11852-0,05478*LN(B2))^2))/(1-1,5*((0,11852-0,05478*LN(B2))^2)) Jeżeli pd-B2,lgd-B3,ead-B4,m-B5, itp. Jeżeli potraficie to tak skrócić jak na filmiku to piszcie ;)