35.4 Rolling Without Slipping Slipping and Skidding

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 1 чер 2017
  • MIT 8.01 Classical Mechanics, Fall 2016
    View the complete course: ocw.mit.edu/8-01F16
    Instructor: Dr. Peter Dourmashkin
    License: Creative Commons BY-NC-SA
    More information at ocw.mit.edu/terms
    More courses at ocw.mit.edu

КОМЕНТАРІ • 42

  • @leophoenixmusic
    @leophoenixmusic 3 роки тому +8

    For everyone confused about how he writes backwards - do you realise how easy it is to mirror a video during editing. 😅

  • @hardikvyas1948
    @hardikvyas1948 4 роки тому +8

    crystal clear. One of the best lectures on this topic

  • @pick26
    @pick26 4 роки тому +3

    Thank you for this video! I found this while trying to get a better grasp on Aristotle's Wheel Paradox (I kept seeing people mention "skidding") and while I'm still not 100% confident, I am definitely getting a better picture of the explanation. I think this also validated some of my suspicions that there is some "frame of reference" magic behind the wheel paradox, but I'm still noodling through it. I think I need to watch this again and your other videos to get a deeper understanding. Thanks again.

  • @pubuduweerakoon7174
    @pubuduweerakoon7174 3 роки тому

    Explanation is so concise and precise. Thanks !

  • @ezekieldujambi8427
    @ezekieldujambi8427 2 роки тому +1

    Man, this is explanation is too good.

  • @caipeide80
    @caipeide80 5 років тому

    Thanks a lot for the clear explanation!

  • @SachinKumar-fk3gn
    @SachinKumar-fk3gn 3 роки тому

    Excellent explanation Sir.

  • @LateNightPoetry
    @LateNightPoetry 4 роки тому +11

    This man is a pro at writing backwards. Holy crap

    • @brokenmatrix366
      @brokenmatrix366 4 роки тому +8

      They use special tech for the weird board and flip the video afterwards.

  • @vb8304
    @vb8304 4 роки тому

    Thank you so much!

  • @martinapetkovska6176
    @martinapetkovska6176 Рік тому

    Thank you for this video🙏

  • @trungac2414
    @trungac2414 6 років тому

    thanks you MIT falcuty

  • @mahmouddesokey3818
    @mahmouddesokey3818 4 роки тому

    Mit is the best

  • @whiteseashells7513
    @whiteseashells7513 Рік тому

    As a last-minute Highschooler who got recommended this video, I wish I could burn Physics completely.

  • @sahilrajeshgajbhiye4968
    @sahilrajeshgajbhiye4968 4 роки тому

    ty very much sir

  • @sashank1729
    @sashank1729 3 роки тому +1

    Notice that he is writing in mirror image for viewers to see correctly

  • @kevinsunil1737
    @kevinsunil1737 2 роки тому +1

    When a cylinder goes down a slope and starts to slip what happens to the velocity of the cylinder?

  • @zewenzhou3574
    @zewenzhou3574 2 роки тому +1

    crystal clear!

    • @zewenzhou3574
      @zewenzhou3574 2 роки тому

      rolling without slipping: 吃上劲了,转了也往前走了,转动和水平运动距离相等;slipping: 地上有冰,太滑了,原地转了但没往前走,或者转的比水平往前走的距离长;skidding: 没自转,直接站稳溜冰了,水平走的距离比转的长

  • @Trisha_Shah_
    @Trisha_Shah_ Рік тому +1

    Doubt: (For pure rolling
    ) At the point of contact of the wheel at the ground , the net velocity=0 hence no motion. But if at that instant no motion is there then how can static friction act ? And if static friction does not act the net torque will also be zero , then how can the body continue the rolling motion ?

    • @user-fb4zo8wd5n
      @user-fb4zo8wd5n 27 днів тому

      The velocity of the point in contact withe ground is zero relative to the ground, but not zero relative to the center of mass. If the wheel is rolling on a flat surface with V_cm = constant, then frition is zero. In that case the torque about the center of mass is zero, jence consant angular speed.

  • @ilkerozdemir1344
    @ilkerozdemir1344 2 роки тому +2

    I wonder what is the direction of friction force in 2. and 3. conditions.

    • @user-fb4zo8wd5n
      @user-fb4zo8wd5n 27 днів тому

      Friction is in the direction to prevent slipping. So, it is to the right in case 2 and left in case 3.

  • @peterking8722
    @peterking8722 6 років тому +9

    Grave mistake at 2:53-3:00, probably common among all physics learners since even an expert here is making
    it in a prepared lecture - It is false that every single point on the wheel has the same speed v_cm in rolling without slipping.
    For instance, the speed at the point of contact is 0, and the speed at the top point (north pole) is twice of v_cm, and
    it is possible (not hard) to compute the velocity (not just speed) of every single point in terms of the angle theta and
    distance r to the center using either trigonometry (law of cosine) or derivatives.
    Also it is more clear for the student to label the angle starting with the point of contact than the north pole so that
    the traced distance on the ground is easily identified with the arc length.
    - PK (A parent to a high school physics student)

    • @wiloberlies9598
      @wiloberlies9598 5 років тому +1

      Not sure it was a 'grave mistake', more a case of gradually introducing the concepts....the contact point being the instantaneous center of rotation (therefore having zero velocity) is covered in the very next video. Remember that these lectures have been parsed into very short 6-minute videos, it could be argued that this comes at some cost to continuity, but should be viewed with an eye towards the entire topic.

    • @yashnirwan8436
      @yashnirwan8436 5 років тому +2

      It was not a mistake... He just considered it as a case of translation and compared it with the case of rotation, that traversed the same distance and hence the same velocity.

    • @jackflash8756
      @jackflash8756 6 місяців тому

      Yes, I noticed he said for rolling without slipping, that all points are moving with the same speed v which is incorrect.

  • @paulvangastel8665
    @paulvangastel8665 Місяць тому

    5:55 This is not correct. NOT every point on the wheel has the same speed as the CM, as these speeds vary between 0 and 2Vcm

  • @ahmeddarwish883
    @ahmeddarwish883 4 роки тому +3

    A question faraway from the purpose of this video , how does he write like that ?

    • @mitocw
      @mitocw  4 роки тому +5

      See lightboard.info to see how this was done.

    • @pradeepchandra1734
      @pradeepchandra1734 3 роки тому +2

      this question kept me thinking through out the video now i have to rewatch

    • @Azzu974
      @Azzu974 Рік тому

      @@mitocw which book is best for this concept ( rolling friction)?

    • @hypocratus7341
      @hypocratus7341 Рік тому

      @@Azzu974 resnick halliday krane

  • @siddhantrajoriya6930
    @siddhantrajoriya6930 4 роки тому

    What if the center of mass is not located at the center of the disc?

    • @JansthcirlU
      @JansthcirlU 4 роки тому +1

      The position of the center of mass depends on the density distribution inside of the circle, but as there cannot be any mass outside of the circle which at the same time is part of the circle, there is no density distribution that shifts the center of mass outside the circle. It's possible to have a situation where the center of mass of the circle isn't exactly at the geometric center of the circle though, in which case you have to consider gravity to act on that point rather than the center of the circle.

    • @Postermaestro
      @Postermaestro 3 роки тому

      well in this particular instance it's not important that the axis of rotation is goes through the center of mass, since we are just dealing with velocities and not momentum

  • @allanthomas8713
    @allanthomas8713 3 роки тому

    Won't it be kinetic friction?

    • @mohammedabdulrahimzuhair4439
      @mohammedabdulrahimzuhair4439 3 роки тому +1

      See rolling without slipping means that the point touching the ground has zero velocity i.e, it is taking the ground with it and remember friction opposes relative motion ( in this case slipping) so the friction here becomes static (since no slipping) .if indeed there's slipping ( or skidding as u may imagine) friction becomes kinetic as u said.if u did not understand,that's fine ponder over it.it took a hella lot of time to get this clarity.😁

  • @minjun9900
    @minjun9900 4 роки тому

    great...

  • @cateb.1678
    @cateb.1678 3 роки тому +1

    This man just casually writing backwards

  • @Trisha_Shah_
    @Trisha_Shah_ Рік тому

    Doubt: (For pure rolling motion) At the point of contact of the wheel at the ground , the net velocity=0 hence no motion. But if at that instant no motion is there then how can static friction act ? And if static friction does not act the net torque will also be zero , then how can the body continue the rolling motion ?

    • @MrSzybciutki
      @MrSzybciutki 11 місяців тому

      This is static friction, not kinetic. When static friction acts, there is never a motion. That's the point of static friction, to oppose forces trying to put a body into motion.