Nuclear Reactor - Understanding how it works | Physics Elearnin

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 7 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 2 тис.

  • @icetheking4310
    @icetheking4310 9 років тому +2302

    I love how we're basically just using high powered energy and nuclear power to heat up water

    • @cheshirepat30
      @cheshirepat30 8 років тому +197

      can't wait until Keurig gets a hold of this technology

    • @ChrisBalyo
      @ChrisBalyo 7 років тому +98

      Getting your morning Joe is as simple as removing your waste pod and tossing it in the radioactive hazard bin.

    • @payamal-abid2651
      @payamal-abid2651 7 років тому +90

      steam powered technology, lol. surprisingly simplistic

    • @jadetowler2495
      @jadetowler2495 7 років тому +25

      Mychael Hunt when we heat the water though, the steam turns the turbines which generate the generator, making electricity. The water is pumped back into the container so it can be used again.

    • @DarkMoonDroid
      @DarkMoonDroid 7 років тому +35

      I love how some folks don't even get the irony.
      😕

  • @triphazard7914
    @triphazard7914 4 роки тому +1341

    Everyone's talking about how they came from Chernobyl, but I came from my Physics homework ...

  • @alassanefaye1409
    @alassanefaye1409 5 років тому +3996

    Watches Chernobyl once... Becomes Nuclear Physicist through UA-cam

    • @nubianfx
      @nubianfx 5 років тому +56

      same...same! lol

    • @squall44
      @squall44 5 років тому +70

      Now I can start throwing people out my helicopters.

    • @guitarguy420
      @guitarguy420 5 років тому +47

      Haha i fucking spit out my drink in laughter

    • @A_Covy
      @A_Covy 5 років тому +18

      So true dude.

    • @coreyjohnson2205
      @coreyjohnson2205 5 років тому +45

      Hell yeah. Gotta admit that show made me very curious about nuclear power

  • @8o8inSquares
    @8o8inSquares 8 років тому +910

    Thanks! Now I can build my own!

    • @luckyalert5614
      @luckyalert5614 8 років тому +59

      don't do that you will get arrested. someone already tried that.

    • @8o8inSquares
      @8o8inSquares 8 років тому +137

      LuckyAlert The can't arrest me if they wont catch me, ehehehe

    • @luckyalert5614
      @luckyalert5614 8 років тому +48

      8o8inSquares ok then have fun.

    • @theAmazingJunkman
      @theAmazingJunkman 7 років тому +65

      You'll need to find some Uranium first

    • @8o8inSquares
      @8o8inSquares 7 років тому +77

      No problem, just get a lot of the old watches with the glowing pointers.

  • @BrianD146
    @BrianD146 3 роки тому +323

    Thank you so much for this optimistic piece about nuclear power.
    I just wanted to add more about the positive effects.
    In the worst case scenarios of a massive earthquake and tidal wave with Fukushima no one died of radiation poisoning. But rather from the overreaction of the government not allowing people to return to their homes.
    A lot of people could have returned to their homes with very few mitigating factors.
    With Chernobyl, the RBMK reactors primary design was to create plutonium for nuclear weapons. Electricity was just a byproduct.
    The accident occurred because of the reckless ambitions of the lead engineer on duty. The deaths were created by the Soviet government not being upfront about the disaster.
    Just hundreds of feet away was reactor number three and then reactor number two and one. They kept running for about another 15 years.
    In both these scenarios today there is tourism including people that are walking right up to the reactor for a limited amount of time.
    Everyone knows that the news sells fear and anger. The news is part of the problem with keeping this truly green energy source from being deployed.
    There are forces that want to make nuclear power so expensive it can never be bilt. Principle among them are oil companies.
    The deaths and expense of global warming with its extreme weather is obvious and plays out everyday.
    I'm excited about generation 4 reactors. They're about six different designs and they have about six different characteristics.
    Some of the best characteristics are
    -They're considered walk away safe.
    -They burn more nuclear waste than they create.
    -The waste is considered hazardous for far less time.
    -They're non-proliferation so they can't be used for nuclear weapons.
    - The designs are small and can be as common as a hospital. They take up the footprint of about a Walmart. A truly local power grid to accompany wind and solar.
    This is truly the future that's going to power our electric cars and trucks. Some of the byproducts of nuclear power is creating hydrogen. This could power our airplanes, trains and ships.
    I look forward to clean skies without smog or inversion layers.
    I would much rather live next door to a nuclear power plant then a power plant admitting CO2 gas in other poisons and toxins.

    • @panchothemonkey
      @panchothemonkey 2 роки тому +19

      Just to add a bit to what you said: In 1992 the eye of a category five hurricane (Andrew) passed over Turkey Point nuclear power plant in Southern Florida. The plant sustained only superficial damages and was able to start up just days later.

    • @davidkammen9054
      @davidkammen9054 2 роки тому

      Indeed, many seem to believe that nuclear power creates a toxic environment but this is entirely untrue they produce very little waste and pose a very small threat as long as they are properly maintained and operated. Unfortunately some cities actually refuse to buy nuclear power and many have been shut down with no plans of reactivating instead they say solar is the future. Solar however creates much more waste than most realize and will most of it is recyclable it is not always recycled properly or at all.

    • @jimh472
      @jimh472 2 роки тому +33

      It's good to see there are actually people who are both environmental conscience AND properly informed on nuclear power. We would have a wonderful world if the Green Cult could get a clue on the matter.

    • @BrianD146
      @BrianD146 2 роки тому

      @@jimh472 ACTUALLY THEY ARE
      I DO TIGHTEN OF NUCLEAR, NUCLEAR BARBARIANS ALONG WITH DECOUPLE PODCAST ARE DEMONSTRATING THAT
      THE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTIST IS FINALLY COMING AROUND THAT NUCLEAR POWER IS THE ANSWER.
      SMALL MODULAR REACTORS WORK PERFECTLY WITH WIND AND SOLAR.

    • @Funsiestype
      @Funsiestype 2 роки тому +4

      Brian… 😂🤣😂🤣😂 you a joke.

  • @jemimasinger9829
    @jemimasinger9829 9 років тому +73

    I'm doing GCSE Physics and this really helped me understand the process, thank you! x

    • @engytharwat3061
      @engytharwat3061 9 років тому +4

      Me too but my exam is next year ! Did you finish the exam ???! If yes please tell me about it ...

    • @jemimasinger9829
      @jemimasinger9829 9 років тому +10

      yeah I did, It was a lot harder than I anticipated so if I could go back I would practice the hardest questions I can find, then anything else will be either the same or really easy. I got an A overall though so you don't have to stress about it. Just make sure you revise a lot in the run up to the exam and you do AS MANY PAST PAPERS AS POSSIBLE (this is the best thing you can do!)

    • @engytharwat3061
      @engytharwat3061 9 років тому +2

      +Jemima Singer thanks !!!

    • @azn4451
      @azn4451 7 років тому +3

      THANK YOU I HAVE MY EXXAM IN TWO WEEKS

    • @lablearnamazonwithbasil922
      @lablearnamazonwithbasil922 6 років тому +1

      GCSE physics is really easy lol

  • @Jim54_
    @Jim54_ 3 роки тому +124

    Humanity’s rejection of Nuclear power was a massive mistake, and the environment has payed dearly for it as we continue to rely on fossil fuels for our electricity

    • @radicalgreek99
      @radicalgreek99 3 роки тому +29

      Nuclear power is not only the best energy we have it's clean. People are so brainwashed

    • @senorGGG
      @senorGGG 3 роки тому +2

      Based

    • @DK-hw6xs
      @DK-hw6xs 3 роки тому +3

      @@radicalgreek99 What are your thoughts on thousand tons of nuclear waste produced from nuclear power?

    • @brambozer1
      @brambozer1 3 роки тому +24

      @@DK-hw6xs I think you mean radioactive waste, and radiation fades over time. Luckily there are multiple materials which radiation cannot travel through. So we put the radioactive waste in boxes made out of these materials until they are not radioactive anymore..The amount of boxes we need is not increasing, its depending on how much energy we use.

    • @catthecommentbothunter6890
      @catthecommentbothunter6890 3 роки тому +1

      Shut up nuclear power is trash and can't save the planet and just kill us all

  • @Baderasiri1
    @Baderasiri1 5 років тому +223

    "Now I know how does a nuclear reactor work" Boris Shcherbina.

  • @komocode
    @komocode 5 років тому +875

    hey you. reading this. just continue watching Chernobyl. k.

    • @emoney5367
      @emoney5367 5 років тому +6

      Chernobyl was a different reactor type.

    • @CDG997
      @CDG997 5 років тому +6

      komocode wtf how u know😂😂😂

    • @haleybooth5950
      @haleybooth5950 5 років тому +3

      that was really funny cuz it's so true!!! but I wanted to know the science behind what happened! although someone below said that it was a different type of reactor, the theory is the same and that's what this video explained! so, all in all, I think it helped, but ill go back to watching now!

    • @ramikj4139
      @ramikj4139 5 років тому

      😂😂

    • @cartercummins2295
      @cartercummins2295 5 років тому

      LOOOL DKM

  • @OhKopo
    @OhKopo Рік тому +21

    I want to add that there are many reactor models, the one shown in this video is a PWR (pressurized water reactor), whereas some can boil the water directly in the RPV, these are called BWRs (boiling water reactor)

  • @mathmage1524
    @mathmage1524 2 роки тому +28

    U235 is the only isotope that's fissinable. U238 doesn't have a chain reaction. U238 is enriched to around 5% U235 in order to be used for nuclear power. The U235 is what creates the energy.

    • @Learn_and_teach.
      @Learn_and_teach. Рік тому

      Uranium-235 is initially used but it bombarded with a neutron to form Uranium-236 which disintegrates or breaks down into fission fragments.Otherwise Uranium-236 is abundant but cannot be directly used.

    • @BlackJackPOL
      @BlackJackPOL Рік тому

      U238 does not have chain reaction however when U238 absorbed fast neutron, it creates Plutonium 239 that causes chain reaction

  • @fckinnonstick9919
    @fckinnonstick9919 5 років тому +79

    Sometimes a random teenage boy is much more understandable than some of our fellow old man professors out there 😁

    • @cheeseburgers82
      @cheeseburgers82 2 роки тому +3

      Older generation would be talking g about y x z = k which then k x n= w 0.0009456 gz blah blah blah

  • @Uksmaster
    @Uksmaster 5 років тому +52

    "Ok, now I know how a nuclear reactor works and I don't need you"

  • @dirkdiggler2430
    @dirkdiggler2430 2 роки тому +29

    So much technology has advanced and when we look at steam engines from the 1800s people laugh of how primitive it was, yet they don't realize that we're still relying on steam engines for energy.

    • @3nertia
      @3nertia 2 роки тому +5

      Yep, just glorified steam power heh
      Isn't it time humans level up?

    • @milanradulovic3915
      @milanradulovic3915 2 роки тому +2

      or from something rotating haha. solar panels seem to be most innovative, true?

    • @3nertia
      @3nertia 2 роки тому +3

      @@milanradulovic3915 Some people may have more advanced ideas ...
      I think that, using CRISPR, a specific fungus from Fraser Island, Australia, and glass sea sponge DNA, we could essentially *grow* super-efficient solar cells that would absorb far more of the UV spectrum than today's photovoltaics as well as other spectrums like IR, X-Ray, wind energy, maybe eventually even CME (Coronal-Mass Ejection) events - maybe it could even absorb EMPs!

    • @karama5562
      @karama5562 11 місяців тому +1

      @@3nertialet bro cook

    • @3nertia
      @3nertia 11 місяців тому +1

      @@karama5562 What are you talking about? Let me cook? Me let someone else cook? :/

  • @OTsornos
    @OTsornos 4 роки тому +21

    You did a good job there mate, really simple yet educative video.

  • @MrCrossover2000
    @MrCrossover2000 10 років тому +7

    i was expecting at any moment for you to say "This is your life and it's ending one minute at a time."
    great video..

  • @duckduckgoose8913
    @duckduckgoose8913 10 років тому +100

    At 3:45 you spelled Boron as Boran. Besides that, it was a good video.

    • @marcoramirez7684
      @marcoramirez7684 7 років тому +2

      Vengeful Sinner yea I noticed that too

    • @AbdulazizAlmawash
      @AbdulazizAlmawash 6 років тому +2

      Thats all what u had found interesting in the whole video? A mistake he had done?! How silly you are

    • @fidelcatsro6948
      @fidelcatsro6948 6 років тому +9

      I thought it was ''moron''

    • @meatytofu45
      @meatytofu45 5 років тому

      me to...

    • @shishka67
      @shishka67 5 років тому +5

      He also said "fossil fuels are on the 'breach' of extinction"

  • @hamzehalkhateebvideos
    @hamzehalkhateebvideos 5 років тому +168

    did he miss the part of the bullets that can not stop?

  • @kenansalkovic9413
    @kenansalkovic9413 6 років тому +124

    Good video and understandable animations, but you missed 3 key elements (especially for a PWR system, like the one in your video). A pressurizer to keep the water in the containment shell circuit liquid. This water would otherwise turn into steam. The next key element is a third circuit to cool the steam from the second circuit. And the last element is the condenser. The place where the steam from the second circuit (high and low pressure turbines) will collect and condense to water, with the help of the third circuit. Other from these 3 points good vid

    • @josephherron7671
      @josephherron7671 2 роки тому +3

      No, not a good video. Not at all. This is full of bad information. I can't even begin to cover them all.

    • @BelleRiverHeating
      @BelleRiverHeating 2 роки тому +1

      I am missing how the reactor starts also. What do you do to get is started? Throw a match at it?

    • @adsmanager5811
      @adsmanager5811 2 роки тому +2

      Why not create your own channel and do better than this?

    • @kibbleofdoom
      @kibbleofdoom Рік тому +2

      Hey hey, I know the answer to this one! There are rods in the core that absorb neutrons. These are called control rods. When the rods are at the bottom (fully inserted) they absorb enough neutron flux to prevent fission. To start the reactor, simply put, you slowly pull out the rods to specific heights and monitor power. Pulling too fast can cause something called prompt criticality

    • @georgeserud
      @georgeserud Рік тому

      yo dad prolly died in a boat sinking

  • @AlwaysaFangirl
    @AlwaysaFangirl 8 років тому +638

    Am I the only one here because they just find Nuclear processes extremely interesting?

    • @contingenceBoston
      @contingenceBoston 8 років тому +9

      No.

    • @cliveramsbotty6077
      @cliveramsbotty6077 8 років тому +50

      you are the only one here stating the obvious

    • @mathewmclean9128
      @mathewmclean9128 8 років тому +1

      NO :D

    • @razamadaz3417
      @razamadaz3417 8 років тому +17

      yep it just blows my mind that something we can't see with the naked eye can create massive amou nts of energy and how human ingenuity has been able to harvest it.It's absolutely amazing.

    • @mathewmclean9128
      @mathewmclean9128 8 років тому +5

      Yeah! I agree! Makes me wonder where technology and quantum physics will be in 50 years from now.

  • @rmachayes
    @rmachayes 10 років тому +64

    While I was onboard nuclear boats I was continually asked by friends and family members about the nuclear reactor. most did not realize that the reactor was used to eventually produce steam for our turbines. nothing hard to understand about that. I used to tell them that once the steam was produced, our propulsion system was like a typical 1,200 psi sytem similar to a typical destroyer. They still were in awe as I but I was more so in realizing how a highly engineered system came into existence.

  • @zackaryfowler8964
    @zackaryfowler8964 9 років тому +237

    i agreed with everything until you said "fusion reaction" fission bro. fission.

    • @johnhartney7576
      @johnhartney7576 7 років тому +16

      Zackary Fowler prolly just a slip of his tongue.

    • @jarvis_kjellberg
      @jarvis_kjellberg 6 років тому +30

      Bhupendra Patel no.. Fusion does not occur in a reactor... Fusion needs high amounts of energy.. Stars like our sun is capable of doing it

    • @Losshe
      @Losshe 6 років тому +8

      @@bhupendrapatel5536 also fusion uses deuterium and tritium, not uranium

    • @FabledGentleman
      @FabledGentleman 5 років тому

      @@Losshe The sun uses Hydrogen

    • @jumanahidris2973
      @jumanahidris2973 5 років тому +4

      I'm a bit confused tbh. What kind of radioactive decay emits neutrons? Isn't it either alpha (helium nuclei) or beta (electrons) that are emitted?

  • @bisexualkings7866
    @bisexualkings7866 4 роки тому +84

    What I learned today,
    Just a complicated way to boil water 😂😂

    • @sunnyd9830
      @sunnyd9830 3 роки тому +10

      Yeah I agree haha very Complicated, yet very CLEAN, environmental friendly and effective. 😎 we need more of these!

    • @soosplays2306
      @soosplays2306 3 роки тому +2

      @@sunnyd9830 yeah what about the waste?

    • @sunnyd9830
      @sunnyd9830 3 роки тому +5

      @@soosplays2306 what about it?

    • @taxfraud1212
      @taxfraud1212 3 роки тому +11

      @@soosplays2306 Would you rather have billions of tons of CO2 in the atmosphere or material that you can easily seal away in an uninhabited place such as siberia or the antarctic? Think about the pros and cons

    • @42luke93
      @42luke93 3 роки тому +11

      @@taxfraud1212
      Exactly! The waste can be contained! No filters or carbon waste like fossil fuels! Nuclear is the way to go and it will save us when fossil fuels deplete. Allowing us to get the energy we need to discover other renewable resources too.

  • @sarangjams9721
    @sarangjams9721 3 роки тому +8

    This will be my entire essay on nuclear energy for Physics, thank you😂

  • @Opinionteer
    @Opinionteer 5 років тому +6

    Boron in the reactor coolant is also used to control the neutron population. When a reactor is first started up the boron concentration is high. And the fuel is used up the boron is removed from the water.

  • @IbnIbrahem
    @IbnIbrahem 5 років тому +3

    Best explanation I've came across so far.

  • @benjaminyork690
    @benjaminyork690 8 років тому +40

    4:26:
    Due to the enormous amount of heat released during the FUSION Reaction?
    It's fission, NOT fusion. Other than that, nice video!

    • @muskadummy4877
      @muskadummy4877 8 років тому +3

      I Agree

    • @rondaxen88
      @rondaxen88 5 років тому +1

      I probably just meant Fission.

    • @avanindrad5988
      @avanindrad5988 4 роки тому +3

      Probably an accident. He said fission throughout the rest of the video.

  • @ronifirst8076
    @ronifirst8076 9 років тому +9

    I am studying uranium and how it can be able to be used for energy thank you this helped

  • @derpderpington100
    @derpderpington100 5 років тому +1

    I like this video. It's not too great, not too terrible.

  • @dhawalsah
    @dhawalsah 8 років тому +17

    Very lucid explanation with superb animations as aid. Nicely Done !!

  • @compuplacesa6300
    @compuplacesa6300 5 років тому +26

    so, will i be recieving my phd via email or what?

    • @sunnyd9830
      @sunnyd9830 3 роки тому +1

      You still haven’t received yours? 👀 they sent me mine via email. It was very quick!

    • @snoopah3077
      @snoopah3077 3 роки тому +2

      @@sunnyd9830 They just sent me a nobel prize award in my email

  • @graysonb9527
    @graysonb9527 6 років тому +15

    I've learned more in this video than all of high school

    • @slimxshady6111
      @slimxshady6111 3 роки тому +2

      Unless you went to a high school that was focused around how a nuclear reactor works, and they did a horrible job, than no lol

  • @AlexandrusMegus
    @AlexandrusMegus 5 років тому +36

    ☢ ''Vnimaniye, vnimaniye." ☢

  • @gabrielflorea2343
    @gabrielflorea2343 7 років тому

    Very interesting post.Like and succes.Very,very beautiful.

  • @joseaveiga2271
    @joseaveiga2271 Рік тому

    This is exactly wat I was looking for, Thank you

  • @johnhartney7576
    @johnhartney7576 7 років тому +3

    Thank you so much! Great video! Actually learned about why there are different types of moderators/ purposes of each! 10/10

  • @cmdrriotz5283
    @cmdrriotz5283 4 роки тому +17

    So how does the power plant actually start the fission reaction? I watched a video that was saying the rods aren't even dangerous when arriving at the plant, but the power plant are the ones that will start the reaction. I'm just curious as to how they do that.

    • @paulanderson7796
      @paulanderson7796 4 роки тому +11

      Fresh reactor fuel is pretty benign stuff, you can bare hand it perfectly safely. The chain reaction starts when you get a sufficient amount of fissile U235 in close proximity to each other and introduce a neutron source to 'light up' the reactor. Control rods are used to restrict the movement of free neutrons in order to maintain the required output from the reactor.

    • @Marco11-08
      @Marco11-08 2 роки тому

      @@paulanderson7796 can you explain neutron source ???

    • @AmIr-dn4od
      @AmIr-dn4od 2 роки тому

      @@Marco11-08 neutrons form when quarks merge with eachother, gluons carry interactions between these quarks, and thats it

    • @Marco11-08
      @Marco11-08 2 роки тому

      @@AmIr-dn4od my question is a simple one. I’m asking who is nuclear fission initiated ?? How the those protons enter the core ??? Are they blasted in there somehow ?? How are they contained to begin with?? I’ve searched everywhere and there’s nothing explaining it step by step

    • @AmIr-dn4od
      @AmIr-dn4od 2 роки тому

      @@Marco11-08 nuclear reactors is driven by the splitting of atoms, a process called fission where neutron is fired at an atom, which then fissions into too and release more neutron and those neutrons released hit other atoms, its called a chain reaction
      the control rods exist to control the rate of fission of the nuclear fuel which is uranium or plutonium

  • @nirmal886
    @nirmal886 5 років тому +257

    Who is here after watching Chernobyl.

    • @nirmal886
      @nirmal886 5 років тому +4

      @@goldnopportunity "Why worry about something that isn't going to happen? "

    • @e46matt7
      @e46matt7 5 років тому

      Me

    • @darshilmehta9905
      @darshilmehta9905 5 років тому

      @@goldnopportunity Everyone

    • @nnndddzzz1
      @nnndddzzz1 5 років тому

      We all are😄😄

    • @eldevochir7751
      @eldevochir7751 11 днів тому

      Me😂

  • @xra3502
    @xra3502 2 роки тому +1

    Well explained! Now I can make my own nuclear reactor.

  • @prium4282
    @prium4282 7 місяців тому +1

    thanks, hopefully i can pass tomorrows test

  • @jakllenW402
    @jakllenW402 9 років тому +4

    I am taking notes on this, just to let you know. This vid is great!

  • @AshwaniMauryaAM
    @AshwaniMauryaAM 5 років тому +13

    "I know how a nuclear reactor works. I don't need you now"

  • @shanmugapriya.n1598
    @shanmugapriya.n1598 9 років тому +13

    very nice easy to understand thank you

  • @unnikrishnanms3431
    @unnikrishnanms3431 4 роки тому

    Excellent.. the best explanation i got in youtube....!!

  • @sachinsemwal186
    @sachinsemwal186 5 років тому

    one of the best explanation till date i found is your's......

  • @42luke93
    @42luke93 3 роки тому +6

    Wow this seems completely efficient and safe. Since it is not a fossil fuel and waste is contained! Why are environmentalists not talking about how nuclear is the way to go! Nuclear will save us when we run out of oil and it will help us get the energy needed for discovering renewable resources too.

    • @atlas2296
      @atlas2296 3 роки тому +1

      Because they dont realize that Nuclear Waste can be recycled and Thorium reactors will produce MUCH less waste

  • @dampnoodle
    @dampnoodle Рік тому +3

    it's amazing how stable we can turn an unstable mineral into a tool.

  • @mr.arighi1013
    @mr.arighi1013 5 років тому +3

    10/10 Boris should see this

  • @noggin9306
    @noggin9306 9 місяців тому

    this is a great video! im nailing physics!

  • @TaniksLaBaguette
    @TaniksLaBaguette 2 роки тому

    I fell like im watching a super well made scholl presentation, nice job

  • @iz_no_good
    @iz_no_good 5 років тому +11

    2 things i dont understand:
    1. is the cooling water contaminated since it passes through the fuel/rods?
    2. this "cooling" water gets hot, circulates to the heat exchanger and there it converts its water to steam? then , the cooling water should be steam too already, right?
    please explain, i am an intern at a nuclear power plant, next week i have to perform a shutdown test :S

    • @williammandella9013
      @williammandella9013 5 років тому +9

      ilias_s don't worry. you always have AZ5 button

    • @danielh2553
      @danielh2553 4 роки тому +9

      The cooling water is not contaminated. This video is very simplified. In a nuclear plant, there are usually 3 circulations. The liquid which is heated by the reactor directly is contained, then the water that is indirectly heated into steam, turns the turbine, and converted from steam back into water, which is also a contained circuit. Finally, there is the water that cools the steam in a condenser, which comes from a water tower or nearby water source, which is never comes into direct contact with the radioactive liquid.

    • @iz_no_good
      @iz_no_good 4 роки тому +5

      @@kvsalahuddin5 test went fine with a few mishaps, that i took care by jumping in the water. i got promoted to shift manager, but still havent got used to having 3 arms 🤪

  • @andrew9194
    @andrew9194 2 роки тому +3

    What I think is interesting is, if you understand geothermal heatpumps, you basically already understand half of how it works.

  • @frankthetank8216
    @frankthetank8216 5 років тому +12

    Execute an emergency shutdown?
    Hold my vodka, comrade

    • @stevenharvey1970
      @stevenharvey1970 4 роки тому

      Its Designed to do it one handed so you don't need to put the Vodka down!

  • @Shriprajapati02
    @Shriprajapati02 7 років тому +1

    I liked this video super reaction

  • @prashantyt2853
    @prashantyt2853 7 років тому +1

    Such a beatifully explained voice is just superb thnkx man

  • @mitchsorenstine9289
    @mitchsorenstine9289 8 років тому +6

    thanks helped me with my report

  • @vincentlaw1415
    @vincentlaw1415 5 років тому +3

    Isn't it funny that by all this complex science we still just heat up water to produce steam at the end to make a turbine spin?

  • @ratneshpaliya52
    @ratneshpaliya52 3 роки тому +3

    The basic funda is almost same everywhere,i.e. the conversion of thermal energy into mechanical energy, which further converted into electrical energy by Dynamo.
    Some directly produces mechanical energy (for rotating the shaft) like Wind, Waves, geyser/hotsprings, etc..

    • @illuminate4622
      @illuminate4622 3 роки тому +1

      The geysers, which is properly called geothermal energy, uses steam turbines too. They don't just get it from the geyser, that would be too unreliable. They drill two very deep holes, push water into one, and steam comes from the other.

    • @Ignisan_66
      @Ignisan_66 Рік тому +1

      Alternator not a dynamo. Dynamo produces direct current, we need alternating current, alternators produce that.

  • @pastelvibe644
    @pastelvibe644 7 років тому

    Wow... Awesome... Do more videos like this... Animation pakka

  • @killerdisorder
    @killerdisorder 2 роки тому

    Gordon doesn't need to hear all this, he's a highly skilled professional

  • @MS-715-7Y
    @MS-715-7Y 2 роки тому +5

    In this model, the steam is recaptured, cooled to a liquid, and then pumped back into the main core reactor casing. Does this method increase the amount of radiation/fusion and energy production, or is it simply used to prevent radioactive water from being expelled into the atmosphere?

    • @OhKopo
      @OhKopo Рік тому +1

      first of, it is fission and not fusion, and it does not particularly increase energy production. Its advantage is the fact that, the water being heated indirectly, it is non-radioactive, meaning the steam going through the turbine is non radioactive. PWRs are the most common reactor type at the moment, because of simply how advanced and researched are its safety systems and its optimization aswell as containment. BWRs come next in term of spread of use, although the water is directly boiled in the BWR, so the steam is radioactive, but it does not mean it is dangerous at all.

  • @RobinHodaVEVO
    @RobinHodaVEVO 11 років тому +4

    Can you PLEASE do a video about the process of electron affinity?????
    I need to see the way they actually do it in a lab!!!
    And can you also give some example numbers so we can get an idea on how much energy we are using, and how much we are gaining?
    Thank you!!

    • @shahmeerhyat
      @shahmeerhyat 5 років тому +1

      Hoda G. Im 5 years late, still wanna know?

    • @ispikel5901
      @ispikel5901 2 роки тому

      @@shahmeerhyat I gues no LMAOO

    • @karama5562
      @karama5562 11 місяців тому

      Y’all think she ever learned it?

  • @mahathirmukti6695
    @mahathirmukti6695 5 років тому +4

    Thank you. You explain it so simple. Now i can rewatch the Chernobyl series once again 😂😂😂

    • @dengalierkuol6595
      @dengalierkuol6595 5 років тому

      Watched the first episode then decided to come here😂😂

    • @Memories_from_the_future
      @Memories_from_the_future 5 років тому

      @@dengalierkuol6595, you are smart. There are high chances you become a nuclear physicist. 😎😎😎

  • @trivanannakkarage9893
    @trivanannakkarage9893 4 роки тому +2

    Perfect explanation! 👏🏼 thank you very much! 🤟🏼

  • @avortiasz
    @avortiasz 2 місяці тому

    that was lowk one of the best explanations ive heard😭😭

  • @Wickedreptiles
    @Wickedreptiles 5 років тому +5

    I’m a nuclear scientist now! I need to go a apply for a power plant.

  • @a1919akelbo
    @a1919akelbo 2 роки тому +4

    What amazes me is we still haven't really evolved beyond "spinny magnet go Brrrrrrrrr" and it's just more and more complex systems leading towards a magnetic generator.

  • @davidnewland2461
    @davidnewland2461 2 роки тому +4

    Pretty accurate. Just so you know the neutrons interact with the hydrogen vin the water molecules because the hydrogen is the same mass as the neutron these allowing the neutron to give most of it's kinetic energy to the hydrogen I've been working in nuclear power for forty years of it's a pretty good explanation of how reactors create electricity those fast neutrons get absorbed by u238 if they don't escape the core first.

    • @zer0bankoe
      @zer0bankoe 2 роки тому +1

      Its amazing people can work for 40yrs in a nuclear power plant and be healthy. Like 50yrs ago cancer would be a 100% risk factor.

  • @Feraminecarts
    @Feraminecarts 2 роки тому

    Thanks! This video really cleared my doubts about how moderators work.

  • @mileslegend
    @mileslegend 2 роки тому

    Watched this video and I have understood everything....keep it up

  • @ordicy3455
    @ordicy3455 4 роки тому +8

    I like how he said fossil fuels are at the brink of extinction, *cough cough* 7 years ago

    • @godwinvaseekaran4523
      @godwinvaseekaran4523 4 роки тому +1

      And, you didn't refer to the extinction of some of the human beings due to Covid-19 by coughing twice, did you? :/

    • @vvaveflakz
      @vvaveflakz 3 роки тому

      If you think 7 years is a lot of time in terms of science you're really incorrect lol,
      if they say on the brink of extinction, they probably don't mean only 10 years.

  • @buddha65281
    @buddha65281 2 роки тому +8

    You mention "heavy" water, could you elaborate on what it is? Also, what studies have been done in regards to water alternatives(what other types of liquids could be of better use ie.. Ethylene Glycol or a Gel etc)?
    Cool to learn about this

    • @jordanwitte
      @jordanwitte 2 роки тому +5

      Heavy water means deuterated water (D2O), in which the hydrogen atoms of regular H2O are replaced with the heavier isotopic form.

    • @subbhy3791
      @subbhy3791 2 роки тому +2

      Hydrogen has 3 isotopes (protium deuterium and tritium). Heavy water is about 11% heavier than normal water because it contains a higher proportion of D2O (heavy water molecules consisting of deuterium instead of protium).

  • @rolandtiiroja
    @rolandtiiroja 5 років тому +4

    So they use nuclear fission to boil water to make electrical energy so that I can use that same energy to boil water?

    • @hunch9018
      @hunch9018 3 роки тому +1

      Woah...

    • @craiga2002
      @craiga2002 2 місяці тому

      For what reason do you think they use coal?

  • @sudha.r8231
    @sudha.r8231 7 років тому +2

    A very good explanatory video. Enjoyed it.

  • @BigLebowski2000
    @BigLebowski2000 Рік тому

    very well explained for a noob as I am. Thanks!

  • @festival3051
    @festival3051 7 років тому +3

    Nuclear reactor. Now we are going to learn about a nuclear reactor. This is a nuclear reactor. Thanks for watching my video about a nuclear reactor.

  • @Ram-vt3rm
    @Ram-vt3rm 5 років тому +5

    Same process I experience in my BOWEL daily!

  • @ultrakool
    @ultrakool 10 років тому +7

    my brain cells overheated, than my brain melted down, watching this. doh! mmm, donuts

    • @divine308
      @divine308 8 років тому +4

      Your brain is similar to a nuclear reactor it has 2 cm of water surrounding it in all directions preventing it from over heating and when it does you have seizure aka the melt down that could lead to death

  • @boazmatthew1162
    @boazmatthew1162 Рік тому +1

    Very nice explanation 👌 👍

  • @georgeserud
    @georgeserud Рік тому +1

    such cool video i

  • @intuitiveobservations459
    @intuitiveobservations459 7 років тому +9

    All these people who say fossil fuels are a shame, why don't we go nuclear. Do you want nuclear powered cars, nuclear powered ships, nuclear powered airplanes flying overhead?
    And don't tell me you are going to power all those things with batteries. You going to power a 747 across the ocean on batteries?
    Nuclear power is fine, but not for transport. For transport we need fossil fuels.

    • @kaibarrera9911
      @kaibarrera9911 7 років тому +5

      No one is saying to use nuclear power to power a car. They're saying we should use it to power bigger things like cities. These can have a greater impact than transportation.

    • @aKzDViNePaCcO
      @aKzDViNePaCcO 7 років тому +8

      but there are already nuclear powered ships though.....

    • @lecoureurdesbois86
      @lecoureurdesbois86 6 років тому +1

      "The climatic change was invented by the Chinese"

    • @wakewind4129
      @wakewind4129 6 років тому +1

      @@aKzDViNePaCcO You're right. Aircraft carriers and Submarines are nuclear powered.

  • @jamesletford4266
    @jamesletford4266 5 років тому +12

    3.6 roentgen, not great not terrible

    • @abdi3439
      @abdi3439 5 років тому

      Just 400 röntgenphotos

  • @timidequinox1789
    @timidequinox1789 5 років тому +8

    I love all my cernobyl fan friends ,lets built a reactor together !

  • @aviationnation5997
    @aviationnation5997 2 роки тому +1

    I wanted to take a steam bath, so I built a nuclear reactor in my bathroom

  • @thirumoorthy1826
    @thirumoorthy1826 3 роки тому +1

    Thanks for tell about the Nuclear Reactor

  • @nubianfx
    @nubianfx 5 років тому +19

    Just passing through so i can figure out whats going on on Chernobyl lol

  • @varovaro1967
    @varovaro1967 5 років тому +3

    So what about the graphite of Chernobyl? Was that the wall of the nucleus?

    • @mrjdgibbs
      @mrjdgibbs 5 років тому +3

      Chernobyl was a totally different design from this. It used graphite instead of water as a moderator. Long story short in Chernobyl the hotter the reactor gets the greater the reactivity. Whereas in a reactor like this if the reactor gets too hot it'll boil the water moderator and therefore reduce the reactivity. Which is essentially what happened at Chernobyl. What put it over the top was another design quirk that created a brief power spike when the reactor was scrammed. The power spike flashed the water info steam which blew the top off the reactor.

    • @varovaro1967
      @varovaro1967 5 років тому +1

      mrjdgibbs thank you! So using graphite was a mistake? Is still used?

    • @mrjdgibbs
      @mrjdgibbs 5 років тому +2

      @@varovaro1967 It was never used outside the USSR, I do believe that there are a handful still in use.
      Sane countries simply all designed their reactors with a safety 1st mentality.

  • @kieranthomas5478
    @kieranthomas5478 5 років тому +4

    So is this how the new us aircraft carrier engine works more or less ? Watched vid and said he don't need to refuel for around 20 yrs 🤔

  • @wildjack2002theawesomeguy
    @wildjack2002theawesomeguy 7 років тому +1

    Thankyou this helped me with my project heaps!

  • @LONEWOLF-rq5tl
    @LONEWOLF-rq5tl 2 роки тому +1

    Who the hell ever even figured all this crap out and even found all these elements and knew what to do with them?? It's just crazy man!!

    • @HaniyaFuad
      @HaniyaFuad 2 місяці тому

      Fr I think about this everyday

  • @levijones1874
    @levijones1874 5 років тому +6

    Oh wow now you want to know about Chernobyl since HBO came out of the series.... to the next video to comment

  • @corona2565
    @corona2565 7 років тому +3

    nuclear power plant generate electricity using the same operations of thermic power plant .The difference is that temperature comes from the nuclear explosions and not from burning organic matter.

  • @renatoigmed
    @renatoigmed 5 років тому +5

    now explain how Stark's ARC reactor works?

  • @prodavampiko
    @prodavampiko 7 місяців тому

    dude you have no idea how useful this was, anytime i tried to wath a vid about this they didn´t acually explain it-- they always just ran over it.

  • @hossameldinmohammed1841
    @hossameldinmohammed1841 2 роки тому +2

    Very nice Video Thank you,
    can you tell me which tool you used to make this video ?

  • @warnpassion
    @warnpassion 11 років тому +106

    Only 17,500 views? And Nicki Minaj gets a billion+ views. Something is basically fucking wrong with this world. (-__-)

    • @minesg9511
      @minesg9511 7 років тому +1

      It's a sad and has been the way of things since the dawn of time.
      I wish it were different but it isn't.

    • @IhateAlot718
      @IhateAlot718 7 років тому +9

      oh fucking please,

    • @old_timey_prospector
      @old_timey_prospector 21 день тому

      I mean I've never seen a nuclear reactor twerk, so...

  • @kravlone7612
    @kravlone7612 3 роки тому +3

    Who is INTP/INFP here JUST to feed your curiosity

    • @powawawawawa
      @powawawawawa Місяць тому

      3yrs late but man am a fkn deprived ENTP suddenly curious abt how these mechanics work. They're useful.

  • @abrarsiddique9053
    @abrarsiddique9053 9 років тому +5

    OK Good Video But where I find Uranium in Pakistans city Karachi
    Pllzzz pllzz Tell me

    • @DSIM_Prakhyathshetty
      @DSIM_Prakhyathshetty 7 років тому +4

      H.A films ** dig ur ass

    • @khudhurghazi2937
      @khudhurghazi2937 7 років тому +1

      you can find uranium in the city big malls . they sell uranium , black matter , plutonium , you name it but its a little expensive . you can buy enriched uranium online too .

    • @anujkatiyar8252
      @anujkatiyar8252 6 років тому

      Tum logo ka gola barud se mann nhi bhara ki nuclear bomb bhi bana kr duniya ko pareshan karoge Aatankwadiyo (bloody terrorist)

    • @Ash-ey7bj
      @Ash-ey7bj 6 років тому

      H.A Films 😶😶😶

  • @alimalik645
    @alimalik645 2 роки тому

    Thank u so much.. Ur video cleared my all concepts.. Excellent.. 👍👍

  • @pjcostantini9157
    @pjcostantini9157 Рік тому

    Thanks. Great video