Laplace's Demon Explained in 4 Minutes | Philosophy of Determinism

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 13 чер 2024
  • This is an explanation of Laplace's Demon and the Philosophy of Determinism. I also explain what Laplace's Demon can teach us about the relationship between Physics and Determinism.
    Related Videos:
    Nietzsche's Demon: • Nietzsche's Demon | Ho...
    Maxwell's Demon Explained: • 2 Simple Solutions to ...
    What Bell's Theorem Really Means: • Bell's Theorem Clearly...
    The Stern-Gerlach Experiment: • Know This, If You Want...
    How Bra Ket Notation Works: • Don't blindly apply, U...
    Schrödinger's Uncertainty Principle & its Relation to Heisenberg's: • How Schrödinger Impro...
    Maccone-Pati Uncertainty Relations:
    • The Quantum Triviality...
    Quantum Theory Playlist: • Quantum Theory
    Image/Video Credit:
    Quote of Laplace taken from his work "A Philosophical Essay on Probabilities": en.wikisource.org/wiki/A_Phil...
    Starlink Satelites passing over, Giles Laurent, CC BY 4.0 creativecommons.org/licenses/..., via Wikimedia Commons
    Laplace, Jean-Baptiste Paulin Guérin, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons
    Laplace, James Posselwhite, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons
    Luzifer, Franz Stuck, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons
    Newton, William Blake, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons
    Scholar Reading in Study, Dutch School, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons
    Archimedes, Domenico Fetti, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons
    Nebula Space Video and Computer Simulation of What James Webb would see are taken Royalty Free from Videvo
    Big Bang Animation, taken from NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center/CI Lab, slightly sped up and reversed animation for part of the video
    Sam Harris 2016 Cmichel67 (Christopher Michel), CC BY-SA 4.0 creativecommons.org/licenses/..., via Wikimedia Commons, cropped from original
    Robert Sapolsky in 2023, Cmichel67, CC BY-SA 4.0 creativecommons.org/licenses/..., via Wikimedia Commons, cropped from original
    ParticlesAndMath, CC BY 4.0 creativecommons.org/licenses/..., via Wikimedia Commons
    General relativity time and space distortion, Lucas Vieira, CC BY-SA 4.0 creativecommons.org/licenses/..., via Wikimedia Commons
    Dietmar Rabich / Wikimedia Commons / “Dülmen, Kirchspiel, ehem. Sondermunitionslager Visbeck, "What if" -- 2023 -- 6686 (kreativ 2)” / CC BY-SA 4.0 creativecommons.org/licenses/...
    Cole Thomas The Course of Empire The Arcadian or Pastoral State 1836, Public Domain from Wikimedia Commons
    Cole Thomas The Course of Empire Destruction 1836, Public Domain from Wikimedia Commons
    Cole Thomas The Course of Empire Desolation 1836, Public Domain from Wikimedia Commons
    Cole Thomas The Consummation The Course of the Empire 1836, Public Domain from Wikimedia Commons
    Gerrit Dou (Dutch - Astronomer by Candlelight), Public Domain from Wikimedia Commons
    Gallery of the Louvre Samuel Morse, Public Domain from Wikimedia Commons
    Caravaggio (Michelangelo Merisi) - The Cardsharps, Public Domain from Wikimedia Commons
    Socrates Address by Belgian artist Louis Joseph Lebrun, Public Domain from Wikimedia Commons
    Astronomer Copernicus, Public Domain from Wikimedia Commons
    Johannes Vermeer-The Astronomer, Public Domain from Wikimedia Commons
    Caspar David Friedrich - Wanderer above the sea of fog, Public Domain from Wikimedia Commons
    If you have any questions or suggestions for future videos, please leave a comment here or shoot me an email at abidebyreason@gmail.com.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 22

  • @bandito_kek
    @bandito_kek Місяць тому +2

    When I start anew in life, I hope my fate is not set in stone. When I’m at the peak of the tracks on a roller coaster, I hope all has been determined beforehand.

    • @DetChesmond
      @DetChesmond Місяць тому +1

      This is actually an incredibly astute example of how our beliefs change depending on the situation, with or without us being aware of that change

    • @AbideByReason
      @AbideByReason  Місяць тому

      well said

  • @rishabh01solanki
    @rishabh01solanki Місяць тому +2

    “Given the present moment and the laws of nature, there is only one possible future.”
    I must respectfully disagree. From any given present moment, multiple futures are possible. While all potential futures are theoretically computed, we only perceive one outcome. The many-worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics aligns more closely with determinism, as it suggests that all possible futures do occur, even though we only experience one specific reality.
    Such a cool video. Loved it.

    • @AbideByReason
      @AbideByReason  Місяць тому +1

      glad you liked the video! It's unclear to me what you respectfully disagree with though. The quote "given the present moment and the laws of nature, there is only one possible future" was meant to convey the essence of determinism. In so far as any interpretation of quantum mechanics is deterministic, I believe this holds. For the case of a deterministic Many Worlds, "all branches" will have one possible future, though a person "in one branch" will not be able to predict certain outcomes and will experience "random events".

  • @jessstuart7495
    @jessstuart7495 Місяць тому

    There is no distinction between knowable and measurable. Quantum mechanics places hard limits on what is measurable (Ex. complementary variables such as particle position and momentum).

  • @Olliejz
    @Olliejz Місяць тому +1

    The cause of hawking radiation, where two particles appear and disappear by joining to each other is completely random. This means there is always going to be a degree of uncertainty when trying to predict something over a long enough timescale as these particles interact with the universe in some ways.

    • @josephpostma1787
      @josephpostma1787 Місяць тому

      How do we know that such an event is random?

  • @user-fv1jy8dp5d
    @user-fv1jy8dp5d Місяць тому

    Well, quantum physics and behavior of quantum objects completely refutes the idea of determinism. For now maybe, but still.

  • @doomd1816
    @doomd1816 Місяць тому

    The problems here:
    Define “universe”
    are you talking about everything resulted from big bang
    Or totality of literally everything
    Because if the “vast intelligence”
    Is inside the universe,
    It can’t calculate all particles infinitely because it is made of those particles
    And would be calculating stuff larger than itself and would have to abstract it

  • @troy3456789
    @troy3456789 Місяць тому +1

    Determinism is real, but it is just too crazy and too varied to predict how a person would behave with it, just based upon an immeasurable concatenation of prior events. They behave deterministically, but still mysteriously enough to the past, you can only guess a range of behaviors.
    Deterministic + Random, and there is no free will in either of those.

    • @willrobbins2550
      @willrobbins2550 Місяць тому

      Nice opinion

    • @troy3456789
      @troy3456789 Місяць тому

      @@willrobbins2550 thanks, that is helpful since it is scientifically proven.

    • @willrobbins2550
      @willrobbins2550 Місяць тому +1

      @@troy3456789 you’re welcome. There is scientific evidence supporting your claim. It is unproven, however

  • @poopykousei8411
    @poopykousei8411 27 днів тому

    I came from an anime that included this

    • @HHYO_
      @HHYO_ 24 дні тому

      which

    • @RobWynn
      @RobWynn 22 дні тому

      @@HHYO_ rascal does not dream!

    • @SabaShubitidze
      @SabaShubitidze 17 днів тому

      bunny girl senpai

  • @Trizzer89
    @Trizzer89 Місяць тому

    Pretty sure the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle proves non-determinism

    • @willrobbins2550
      @willrobbins2550 Місяць тому

      We can’t know doesn’t mean it can’t be

  • @frigoff1841
    @frigoff1841 20 днів тому

    That photo of Sam Harris didn’t age well

  • @generalwin13
    @generalwin13 Місяць тому

    You lost me at Sam h