Two of the three questions have nothing to do with the theory of evolution. About he third one, on intelligence; why _should_ other animals be as intelligent as humans? Evolution is a process that makes organisms more adapted to their environment. As such, intelligence has yet to be proven to be a successful long-term adaptation.
That makes no sense. Even soda contest winners are only 1 in 12, and they happen more frequently than spontaneous generation. The chances of an occurance being one would mean it happens each time possible. It doesn't. Your presumption is showing.
@@peterengland8131 It doesn't make sense because you don't understand what you're talking about. First of all, spontaneous generation was debunked by several scientists, most notably, Pasteur. Let's not conflate the development of life from organic chemistry with spontaneous generation or the natural formation of amino acids. The probability that you will win the lottery may be 1 in 10 billion. The probability that someone will win the lottery is 1. We know that amino acids form naturally, we have even discovered them in meteorites. Therefore, the probability of amino acids forming in nature is 1.
Two of the three questions have nothing to do with the theory of evolution. About he third one, on intelligence; why _should_ other animals be as intelligent as humans? Evolution is a process that makes organisms more adapted to their environment. As such, intelligence has yet to be proven to be a successful long-term adaptation.
"Some studies say the probability of amino acids forming by chance is.... "
One. Because we know amino acids occur naturally, the probability is one.
That makes no sense. Even soda contest winners are only 1 in 12, and they happen more frequently than spontaneous generation.
The chances of an occurance being one would mean it happens each time possible. It doesn't. Your presumption is showing.
@@peterengland8131
It doesn't make sense because you don't understand what you're talking about.
First of all, spontaneous generation was debunked by several scientists, most notably, Pasteur. Let's not conflate the development of life from organic chemistry with spontaneous generation or the natural formation of amino acids.
The probability that you will win the lottery may be 1 in 10 billion. The probability that someone will win the lottery is 1. We know that amino acids form naturally, we have even discovered them in meteorites. Therefore, the probability of amino acids forming in nature is 1.
Well done! :)