Two Truths and a Lie: Isaac Newton in Cambridge with
Вставка
- Опубліковано 4 лис 2023
- Oxford Mathematician Dr Tom Crawford joins Dr James Grime @singingbanana and @numberphile to determine which stories about Isaac Newton in Cambridge are true and which are false... Learn more about the work of Isaac Newton with the Maple Learn worksheet here: learn.maplesoft.com/doc/urkp0...
Sign-up for Maple Learn Premium using the code TOMROCKSMATHS for a discounted subscription. Head to getlearn.maplesoft.com/ for more information.
Subscribe to James' channel here: / @singingbanana
Thanks to @isaacnewtoninstitute for giving us access to the lecture room.
With thanks to:
James Grime
The Isaac Newton Institute
Maplesoft
Queens' College
Centre for Mathematical Sciences
Trinity College
Cullinan Studio
It's No Game
CMGlee
Dake
Joe Double
Physics Classroom
Produced by Dr Tom Crawford at the University of Oxford. Tom is Public Engagement Lead at the Oxford University Department of Continuing Education: www.conted.ox.ac.uk/
For more maths content check out Tom's website tomrocksmaths.com/
You can also follow Tom on Facebook, Twitter and Instagram @tomrocksmaths.
/ tomrocksmaths
/ tomrocksmaths
/ tomrocksmaths
Get your Tom Rocks Maths merchandise here:
www.beautifulequation.com/col...
Learn more about the work of Isaac Newton with the Maple Learn worksheet here: learn.maplesoft.com/doc/urkp0izyjs/trm-newton-worksheet
"James, is that you?" In the beginning 🤣 Acting skills 10/10 hahahahah nice video and very interesting facts with a fabulous guest!
I loved that opening! I really hope for more crossovers between you two
The crossover I never knew I needed! And in my University! Have a lecture in that very CMS in about 5 hours time but I’m still not asleep lol
Absolutely loved this!
I went to James' channel and unfortunately I did not find the video. He stopped publishing more than a year ago😢
Thanks for joining the video Dr Numberphile 😄
its funny how james grime is universally considered THE numberphile even tho its probably most fair to call that brady. like the camera guy who runs the channel and many other cool science channels actually
Sir Isaac Newton ❤❤
My inspiration 😊
This will be epic for sure 😃
So utterly entertaining
Excellent.
Who noticed that James walked by the moment he said legend. Almost like it was planned lmao
Tom's over there on the opposing turf, hehe
I wonder what Wiles' announcement has to do with Newton. The only link given was the name of the building.
@Lionfield should hear about this
Yay I was right. I knew one, and thought one quite plausible, and doubted one. Does that make me a mathematician?
Fun and games on the Cambridge CAMPus!?!
Got to be the bridge! Lets find out...
What does it mean for a tree to be a descendent of another tree ?
isn't the tree a scion not a descendant?
This was great fun. I wish I could interview Tom on my own math channel .
I want to see Isaac Newton’s workroom 😂👍😒🍏11:57👻 🤪👋
I think I found the lie already.
I am pretty sure the Newton apples are not red.
this video is just a pair of mathematical twins that went down different aesthetics.
How to ruin a good pizza with math lol
1) True.
2) False, it's known as the Newton tree but evidence suggests that Newton probably first discovered gravity when Cambridge was shut due to the plague so if there was a tree (there probably wasn't) it would have been at Newton's home.
3) False, Newton died before the bridge was made.
Edit: I need to go outside more
Oh okay I didn't know about the 'descendant' part of the apple tree... hard to believe though :)
isn’t the title “two truths a one lie”…why did you write “one truth and two lies”?
1 Vacuum
Once you take the contents out of matter the potential of that matter rises and simply converts to kinetic energy.
Reasoning states that vacuums want to collapse upon itself, but this observation can only be explained by gravity. Matter must be the only thing that can attract or repel matter. Furthermore, any surmountable equivalently rational of matter can attract that matter and any matter less than itself. Presumably walls of a vacuum must be attracting each other.
______________________________________________________________________
2 Matter in a Vacuum
Matter surrounded by a vacuum, that matter's potential energy will rise.
Reasoning states that if we have nothing around us we'd move through space easier potentially.
______________________________________________________________________
3 The Complexity of Matter
The combination of matter causes the matter to lower its potential energy.
Reasoning states matter in a material-environment; the matter slows down thus dropping its potential energy.
______________________________________________________________________
Newton just simply didn't understand that space was a vacuum. Believe or not I didn't do this for nothing.
Once you compare matter to the vacuum of space it gives you, perpetual potential energy. Perpetuity of potential energy creates a circuit for matter, and that natural event is called gravity. When the perpetuity of potential energy is met with the vacuum of space the only theories these laws of potential energy and Newtonian laws can describe how vacuums affect as; is a conversion from perpetual potential energy to perpetual kinetic energy giving us an orbital circuit.
The perpetual sum of potential energy equals to the perpetual sum of kinetic energy.
A really good example of how gravity works is how tungsten doesn't just explode in Edison's light bulb. Tungsten begins to suppress itself when exposed to the vacuum through gravitational force increasing the amount needed to change its state of matter. Knowing this we could presume that when exposed to a vacuum that its complete spectrum of potential energy is directly increased.
Accreditations to essential vacuums.
To leave one quote to summarize what gravity is; I would like to say this.
Gravity can not act upon other gravity it must be circuited from point a to b. Although gravity can act on matter, as it is a circuit, like copper to electricity.
(a small excerpt about molecular gravity)
If I were to explain the determinants of an outcome with a fifty fifty percent chance. Then I would start to explain that the first piece of information; determines the outcomes by randomly choosing the first time and choosing it one hundred percent of the time there after. Sense we know what we know about potential energy we can assume that when dealing with matter it can only affect other forms of matter, as long as force is providing through acceleration two objects will affect each other. This gravity alone could imprint and store energy from the accelerant. This alone could provide a blockade enough to explain the problems within quantum mechanics.
Let's assume that gravity can store energy in vacuums like between molecules in which the space provided by definition is inert. What that means exactly is that the vacuum itself can not and will not move. Whereas vacuums themselves are massless thus volumeless, densless, and shapeless.
Conjugating this reason as indisputable facts you can take it to say electricity can be held in superposition due to the lack of matter. This statement alone could explain superpositional frames of energy in quantum physics. Electricity exerts an opposite force on its circuit. Which is why it gets rid of electrons while also suspending the electrons. Though the circuit will store the imprint of that matter, like wax for a record player - down to copper for a voice. Audio particles can be shown by this same trait. Basically the gravitational space is being taken up, and any energy in any state of matter can just simply tell which path was better due to changing its state from kinetic energy to potential energy.
The third law is very special to me. This came to be for the oddest and most backwards way it could come to fortuition. In highschool we were studying catalysts when I realized that when something like mentos is introduced to cola that liquid state of matter is very futile. The only way the reaction is possible is that the potential energy changes `state by lowering the potential energy of the liquids; that directly touch to some extent the catalyst. Anything beyond that natural event of potential energy lowering; Newtonian laws take over. Basically the high reaction of changing states of matter is because of the high kinetics that's interacting with the liquid which had that basic law of complex matter acting upon it.
The important part of this is that -when you suck out a sandwich baggy... What's that bond keeping the sides together? More so to say the natural state of gravity at a kinetic state is bonding the matter together. To a point that it won't separate at least without breaking the vacuum itself.
It's like real physicists are trying to tell you guys; that the only crushing force is force itself. Oh by the way force is a trait of matter.
The only trait I can think that non matter does is that it changes potential energy in some way.
catalytic potential problems
P~ k#1-(k#2)=y
P~ y+k#1=D
x equals an expressed version of kelvin as r before or equal to the point matter changes states of matter; within an absolution of force.~ "but not anymore because now we just call it" kelvin.(Allan Adams)
assume the potential state of matter.
________________________________
k#1- m#2 / k#2 - m#1 =g field
~P-k potential as kelvin to express the limit to which its state of matter can hold.
________________________________