, I been pushed to the skies by GE90, GEnx, Trent 700, Trent 1000, but for some reason have felt the most power with the Cfm56 engines on the a320. Idk if it’s because the plane is small and pilots actually put a decent amount of thrust, but whenever I sit on a larger plane, every pilot puts like 5% thrust for a smooth ride , but I don’t want a smooth ride , I want a full thrust takeoff 😢😂. That’s actually more impressive to me. How such large and heavy planes can takeoff with minimum thrust of GE90 required. Also the Trent 1000 on the a330 is one of the best aswell. You can feel it
Thrust is generally derated maybe 15-20% in ideal conditions but I think not even that much usually. In any case, whether on a narrow body or wide body, only the thrust needed is applied for fuel, noise, and wear reasons - these are all expensive for an airline. A smooth ride is not at all the reason in any case. I think the gap between max thrust and calculated take off thrust is actually smaller on wide bodies (I bet it's generally under 10% derated) due to the sheer amount of fuel and weight on board for the usually longer trips. That weight proportion might explain why you don't feel it as much proportionally though. I wonder if in places like Japan where widebodies are used for shorter domestic routes (less fuel and luggage), you would feel what you are looking for.
@@ChristopherBurtraw yeah I think since smaller aircraft’s have reduced weight, you are more ought to feel the g force. With the already substantial weight an fuel, wide bodies tend to be used as efficiently as possible
@@ChristopherBurtraw Interestingly enough, I heard from a bunch of pilots that derated takeoffs use more fuel as more thrust is needed to compensate during the climb out. I think I remember reading it somewhere on the A320 FCOM too
Music to my ears 😋
Ikr, can't ever get old of these engines
😂@@RyanZ225_PC
@@marto787 ??
, I been pushed to the skies by GE90, GEnx, Trent 700, Trent 1000, but for some reason have felt the most power with the Cfm56 engines on the a320. Idk if it’s because the plane is small and pilots actually put a decent amount of thrust, but whenever I sit on a larger plane, every pilot puts like 5% thrust for a smooth ride , but I don’t want a smooth ride , I want a full thrust takeoff 😢😂. That’s actually more impressive to me. How such large and heavy planes can takeoff with minimum thrust of GE90 required. Also the Trent 1000 on the a330 is one of the best aswell. You can feel it
Trent 1000 is on the 787; Trent 700 is on the a330
@@MarksamtheMarksman_Official yeah I knew that in the first half of the comment, but I mistyped at the end
Thrust is generally derated maybe 15-20% in ideal conditions but I think not even that much usually. In any case, whether on a narrow body or wide body, only the thrust needed is applied for fuel, noise, and wear reasons - these are all expensive for an airline. A smooth ride is not at all the reason in any case. I think the gap between max thrust and calculated take off thrust is actually smaller on wide bodies (I bet it's generally under 10% derated) due to the sheer amount of fuel and weight on board for the usually longer trips. That weight proportion might explain why you don't feel it as much proportionally though. I wonder if in places like Japan where widebodies are used for shorter domestic routes (less fuel and luggage), you would feel what you are looking for.
@@ChristopherBurtraw yeah I think since smaller aircraft’s have reduced weight, you are more ought to feel the g force. With the already substantial weight an fuel, wide bodies tend to be used as efficiently as possible
@@ChristopherBurtraw Interestingly enough, I heard from a bunch of pilots that derated takeoffs use more fuel as more thrust is needed to compensate during the climb out. I think I remember reading it somewhere on the A320 FCOM too
Small aircraft: wild powerful take off
Large aircraft: gentle acceleration take off