Losing Control
Вставка
- Опубліковано 25 сер 2024
- The plaintiff parked his truck at the defendant’s furniture store, and a car overloaded with merchandise smacked into his vehicle, so the plaintiff is suing. The defendant claims the plaintiff parked in an active loading zone instead of the designated parking area, so the defendant doesn’t believe he owes anything.
I feel like the business was like "who argues with everything and everyone, lets send him". 😂
Love this comment so much!! I think you are exactly right!!🤣🤣🤣
The defendant looks like a creepy villan...😮
Dr Mad Scientist 😨
Spot on!
I got that vibe from him as well. He was definitely a cocky little turd. Lol
I got this too..
def givin off Hunter Biden vibes
If the cart bulldozed a HUMAN BEING WHO wasn't authorized to be there would defendant still present the same argument 🤔
Exactly
Yes. Yes he would.
Sounds like trespassing to me
The Defendent looks creepy 🫣
Oh my gawd - yes 😬
Agreed!!
The thumbnail threw me all the way off fr.
The guy at the end saying the plaintiff was lucky and it was close, obviously wasn't paying attention. You can't hit a car that you know is there and say it was parked illegally as a defense. The law doesn't work like that.
"The guy at the end"!!!!!!!!! I can't allow that.
I have seen many cases like this but car accidents. Was the accident done be a car illegally parked or a driver driving negligently. If he parked on the road and there was a sign, plaintiff would of lost. He assumed the risk by parking there. There is a sign for a reason. They take illegal parking on a street different than on a private parking lot. At the same time the Plaintiff picks up and drops off furniture there. He has the right to park there because he is doing business there. This all changed when the store saw the estimate.
@@georgebenevidesyou’re wrong. Even if it were illegally parked on a road with a sign, the plaintiff still would have won. A car parked illegally deserves a ticket and to be towed. That’s the law. It does not deserve to be damaged by other negligent drivers or workers etc. The correct, legal procedure to deal with an illegally parked car is to have it towed, not drive into it 🤦♂️
So, what happens if you park next to a fire hydrant and the fire department smashes your windows to get the hose to the hydrant during the fire? Do you sue the fire department? No. You eat the costs because you parked illegally. This case is different because there was negligence on both sides .. it should be 75% fault of plaintiff and 25% fault of company
@@franbacon82 that might be a legal exception. But private citizens cannot just smash into an illegally parked vehicle without having to pay the damages 🤦♂️
Doug is so good at his job lol making people feel like IDIOTS😂😂😂😂😂
"Assume negligence" is the stupidest thing I've heard a litigant say on this show in a while 😂
"If the car wasn't there" 😂😂😂
The defendant thinks he can get away with it 😅
He STILL thinks that he should have won. Wow. He's dangerous.
defendant is the kind of guy that thinks that if u park illegally then he can do whatever he wants to your vehicle while it is parked there . i have known some homeowners and neighbors who would do things to a vehicle if it was parked in front of their home or parked in a space that they preferred . people like this need to get sued so they learn that they cannot do whatever they please to a parked vehicle .
The defendant might want to be less mouthy with JM.
The Plaintiff wasn't illegally parked. The store that he was picking his stuff up from gave him the parking pass so the other business could see he could park there. So not illegally parked. The only excuse would be that he blocked their bay and he didn't do that. The bays were separate and distinct. The other company just didn't like that they didn't have full use of the loading area period.
It's not a parking pass. It is his business information.
@@tmilesffl the Plaintiff stated the business he was picking up his merch from gave him the paper to put in the window to prove he was loading his vehicle
Another person that thinks he is ABOVE the law..and LOST
The defendant was a little too confident and acting "cocky" with the judge. The employees "assumed the risk" when they continued their job, even though the car was still there. The plaintiff even went through the trouble of getting a second cheaper estimate, and that's what he sued for, showing he wasn't trying to be greedy. Wish, however, he brought a letter from the store he was picking up furniture from saying he had permission to be there, that was his whole defense.
You hit a parked car; you are responsible. period. It is amazing to me people are so ignorant and irresponsible to try this defense.
If you park illegally all bets are off
@@christopherchance4860incorrect, I’m an insurance adjuster and what you said is legally incorrect.
@@christopherchance4860 so if there's a car illegally double parked, you can just drive into it? 😂
@christopherchance4860 So, just to recap: Park illegally and someone can intentionally kill you and get off. Man, rough call.
well lets get real here, your paid to deny claims, so while you may not like what I said, your win/lose track record speaks volumes@@zacharybohlman4069
The point he was trying to make when he stated he left with items, then came back.. what the heck does that have to do with the price of tea in China.
in order to load/unload at a loading dock, you first must PARK at the dock!
Defendant must think it's airport rules xD
Just because something is illegal doesn't mean you can do something illegal to it. So does he think that every parked car he can just wreck and it's okay because they're park illegally? What is the limit that you can do to an illegally parked car?
Hold on a second?? 🤨
The yawning at the beginning 😂😂😂
Doug that was not a close call. lol
I thought the judge was going to jump across the bench when he said "hold on now...wait a minute" and then followed that up with a bunch of ma'ams 😂😅
A stationary vehicle is NEVER at fault. How can it be?
I'd say by being stationary in a place or zone, it should have never been
@@brandengrass8340yeah but that’s not the law 🤦♂️
I can think of one case but it may not apply everywhere.
A friend was coming up to a stop light when the light changed, his front tires were over the line. A lady making a left turn hit his front end. Though she could clearly see him, the court deemed the accident his fault for being stopped over the line.
Guy: "Hold on, hold on"
Judge: "don't tell me to hold on"
the consequence to parking your car "illegally" is getting towed, not it getting crushed lol
The YT Entitlement was beaming from the defendant with every smug corny responses. He was definitely a internet lawyer who thought google was sufficient enough to win his case 🤣 and the YT entitlement reared its pale ugly head even more when he lost the case and still felt in his delusional mind that he shouldve won AFTER hearing what we all heard as facts & “NORMAL” circumstances. U can see it in his eyes, these people live in a different world.
I'm so glad this plaintiff took them to court. The fact that the defendant STILL thinks he's in the right is ridiculous.
That glare he's giving ain't right
The defendant looks like one of the cops from NYPD Blue.
Even if the car was illegally parked they have to call a tow truck, not proceed with business as usual.
The store manager should have towed the illegally parked truck, after waiting almost an hour to move the truck.
That defendant has a sinister look.
I'm confused.....how can he be illegally parked if he was conducting business with the store that has the same right to use the loading dock? He may have been inconsiderate but he was conducting business.
He must be *actively* loading or unloading to be legal. The other guys are still liable for the mistake but they had every right to call for a tow and let the driver foot the bill.
@@wildcaveman5310 on private property there is no such standard.
@@MatthewSmith-lr8bm the property owner or lease holder has the right to make that judgement. Not the general public.
@@wildcaveman5310 that's the problem both companies have the right to the same dock.
@@MatthewSmith-lr8bm “same dock”. As far as we know it is not specifically marked out as different dock spaces to be used individually of each other (in which case the defendant would have absolutely no claim to the area the guy was parked in). Therefore it is a group dock space and they share the space by whoever needs it at the time. That doesn’t mean one party can park while not using it.
Drivers are not supposed to park in loading spaces. They are supposed to park in a normal spot then move to loading when the order is ready. It’s not hard. But way too many people have a “I’m special and that doesn’t apply to me” mentality (especially when they think they will only be there for “2 minutes”). I see this far too often in my area even by people parking in fire lane for the grocery store because “they are special and only going to do one thing”. It doesn’t matter. The entitled attitude needs to end and everyone needs to obey the rules and not make excuses.
You can tell the defendant is used to being the 'smartest guy' in the room.
Bodies in defendants basement. Guaranteed. Bodies
😂😂
The defendant has a weird demeanor
So,
“If he was standing there, in the same parking bay, would you ram HIM with the cart? That’d be assault. You have some duty to avoid.
Retail people will never understand law over rides store policy lol this dude is salty hahaha
Even if a car is parked in the middle of the road...like literally in the middle of the road parked and you hit the car you COULD still be liable. Just because someone is parked illegally doesnt give you the right to hit the car
The defendant thought he was going to win . The Judge ruled for the plaintiff and that's what he got for thinking .
Rob Reiner's son lost this one lol
😊😅😊
I don't think that Rob would've raised a son so stupid.
@@Quartzquiz333true
He does looks a bit like Archie's son in law.
@@Quartzquiz333 No but meathead would.
It was a loading dock and he was waiting on furniture. Am I missing something? Smh 🤦🏾♀️
this was a no brainer from the beginning. a 5 year could of judged this one!
The defendant reminds me of the villian of Men in Black.
They hit that guys car on purpose, wa there almost an hr and didn't think to call smh that's he's gotta pay😂
I would love to have a dollar for every time judge Marilyn says “thank you Douglas “. 😂😂😂 I would be a wealthy woman right now!!! 😂😂😂
This defendant is so freaking annoying 😑
Defendant looks like he would kill someone and have no hard feelings about it. Just look at his eyes
Yes!
How was that a close call???
I'm antisocial and avoid 99% of the population (by staying at home with UA-cam for company). Once again, PC reminds me that I'm making the right decision. Imagine standing in line at the grocery store and the defendant is behind you, attempting to engage you in conversation. He's 100% creepy and potentially dangerous! He looks like he pays women, but then he claims that he did nothing wrong because she was offering an illegal service!
❤
If it’s a business with no parking signs they should know a tow truck company who could’ve gotten there in the hour the man was parked. Tow it. They were mad the man parked and was in their way, kept working and damaged it. Defendant thought he was smarter than the Judge and I think Doug at the end agreed with the defendant by his remarks to both of them.
Thanks to God the defendant is not one of people who puts laws. Just go eat and enjoy your lunch and don't think about it.
If it's illegally parked then have it towed. You can't damage it and just say oh well, should not have been there. The defendant will never win with his argument.
🇺🇸❤️🙏🏽excellent case 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🇺🇸❤️🙏🏽
He looks mad that he's wrong
A car being parked illegally doesn't make it open season to destroy the car. Call for a tow.
No you shouldn't have one the case.. in what world do you live in, I guess the brain cells left with the top of his hair. Just vanished
If almost all defendants were correct, innocent, not culpable or negligent, THEY WOULDN'T HAVE A LAWSUIT AGAINST THEM 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
People love talking over her. Totally would be different if it was a male judge.
Defendant looks so creepy.
The defendants argument made as much sense as someone saying "I shot him in self defense because he was trying to rob me during our drug deal - he wouldn't be dead if he hadn't tried to steal my drugs"
Who is stupid enough to think that if a car is illegally parked that it's open season to damage it without any fault? The Plaintiff is a jerk- most definitely- but the Defendant is completely clueless on how the law works.
That's a junkyard part... He could've got that fixed for $500 bucks plus installation.
Harvey made a little rhyme at the end, lol
So would the defendant accept he was responsible if the plaintiff had been sitting in his car? The accident happened regardless and the defendant is responsible. Tow companies get sued, and lose, all the time for damaging cars they tow that are illegally parked. The tow is perfectly legal, damaging the car isn't. This really isn't any different than that.
The plaintiff arrived at 3 and left at 2....
What kind of logic is this? You shouldn't have parked there so if I hit u, it's on you? Huh? This defendant seems the type to key someone's car if it is not parked right. It's within his logic.
I have to take the defendants side here a little bit. The plaintiff was parked illegally. Is the defendant just supposed to stop what he’s doing and wait for almost an hour till he comes back? I get it, that they’re supposed to see him, but, they should’ve at least split the repair cost.
The theory of the defendant is unlogical and just plain stupid that people that causes accidents to he held not responsible for their negligence. If that's the case, cars on the roads can cause accidents and not be held responsible. 🤦♂️
Ohhh I love Doug so much 😂😂😂
They get a free vacation and the show pays for the verdict. Plus, you get to be on TV 📺 and meet the gorgeous judge. E’erybody wins.
I deal with that daily! People park in the 20-minute loading zone for over the allotted time and when they get citations they get upset and I always get the same stories. I was dropping off, I was only here for a few minutes, or my favorite. I never got a ticket in the past. My reserve parking stall is next to the loading zone, and when I pull in, if there's a car in my stall. I will locate the owner and tell them not to park there. 80% of the time I will get the, how am I supposed to know this is your parking stall. I point at the sign that their car is parked facing, which says RESERVER 24 HOURS DO NOT PARK.
I agree with the defendant, but he should've issued a ticket or had that car towed.
That would be so frustrating to put up with on a regular basis. People can be so entitled. Or they have a mindset that if they're quick, it doesn't count. Lol
Stay out loading docks if you can't hit a bay and don't have a trailer. I would out up signs and call for a tow.
The defendant def don’t listen to both sides
She doesn’t understand military time…?
Her makeup is fantastic here 💕👍
She's hot
Idk I’d go 50/50 on this. The plaintiff should’ve gotten some responsibility for being illegally parked.
But WASSSS he? That’s even DEBATABLE- he is a Contracted delivery guy for THAT COMPANY
@@SamuelGBerman if you listened carefully the defendant gave a time stamp of how long the vehicle was there. A vehicle shouldn’t be in a loading dock that long, should just be there to load and unload then move to a regular parking spot until time for a next delivery to load up.
Also he’s a delivery guy for a furniture company, not for the defendant’s company. They just share the same loading area
@@bossbabehabits1202he may have been inconsiderate but he was conducting business with a tenant that has the same right to the loading dock. Were there signs restricting the length of time?
What you would do is totally irrelevant to what the law actually is 🤦♂️ If you were a judge, you would have to rule the exact same way Judge Milian did, because that’s the law. An illegally parked car should be ticketed and towed, not damaged and have to pay for the repairs someone else caused 🤦♂️
@@bossbabehabits1202 if you listen VERRRRY carefully - u will hear PLAINTIFF WON lol
People like this, you see on the movie screen, you really wouldn’t think that people with this mindset actually exist… The defendant was weird and de Lu Lu.
3:14 Oops, you left the address on the screen... 188 Main Street, Paterson, NJ
There was no no parking loading only sign
The Defendant definately has that creepy "Guy with Candy/"Hey You want some Candy, Little boy???" vibes.
How do you hit a parked car??
Split the cost is the fair thing to do take some responsibility for leaving your car where it should t be what are they supposed to do stop working for an hour while they wait for a tow truck and lose possibly $1000’s of dollars. If I park my car right behind you and you do see it even tho it’s a no parking and you hit me are you responsible?
Yes. You are responsible for hitting a parked vehicle, even if it is illegally parked 🤦♂️ Why is it so hard for people to understand that what they think is fair is totally irrelevant to what the law actually is? 🤦♂️
You know?
Defendant is a bone head
JUST FROM THE OPENING ARGUMENTS & THE DEFENDANT RESPONSE YEAH I FIGURED THE PLAINTIFF WOULD'VE WON. THE DEFENDANT IS JUST A LOUSE WHO DOES THIS THEN TRIES TO WIGGLE THEIR BROKE ASSSS OUT OF IT. THEN BRINGING UP STUFF THAT HAS ABSOLUTELY NOTHING TO DO W/ THE ACCIDENT HIS GUYS CAUSED. POOR BUSINESS PRACTICES. HE JUST DOESN'T GET IT
Every time they decide to not mention the company name we know they are full of BS
Wow kinda of a grimy dude
Doug clearly didn't agree with the judge lmao
First case I've watched where I was genuinely annoyed with Doug's commentary
you know
"Fifteen fifty " is not English to JM ?
The Plaintiff had a parking permit to park at the loading dock to load up his furniture from the store after purchase. Defendant is a loser all the way.
So question. Years ago I had a guy who was going to a party across the street from my house park his truck in my yard without my consent. He got drunk at the party and passed out, so next morning the truck is still there. So, if being a Saturday, I decide to mow my lawn, and a rock flies up from the lawn mower into his truck and cracks his windshield, am I responsible to fix it?
I would think if you see it's there and continue to do something that damages it, yes. You should have the person remove it if they do not, then have it towed out of your way. The defendant should have had the car towed if it was in an illegal spot.
@@michellehawkins1027 so a guy parks on my property without permission, and I have to inconvenience myself by spending my morning calling and waiting for a tow truck to remove him? Doesn't sound right to me, but I guess I'm in the minority on this one.
@@stephenhiggs5224 You would still be in the minority while paying to fix or replace the guy's windshield. Not like mowing your lawn is an emergency that cannot wait later.
@@stephenhiggs5224 I'm not saying it's right but sadly that is the law.
@@stephenhiggs5224regardless of what you think is right or fair, you have to obey the law or you pay the consequences, as already pointed out by others. Have the car towed. If you damage it, you are responsible. That’s the law
What if I kid was running back there and the cart ran over and killed the kid . The cart a car or a dog if you are not in control of it and there’s damage it’s ur fault.
Plus’s what if the cart hit his truck when he was there loading currently
I'm team defendant. Too many people wanna play victim because they park and drive like morons.
Me too! I think they should’ve split the cost
@teisham4508 this judge I tell ya sometimes she so biased
Totally agree
He wasn't illegally parked. He was in a loading zone, which was shared with the other store he was unloading stuff to.
I'm going to have to be a minority on this verdict, I disagree with it . JM dropped the ball , she could at bare minimum hold each of them 50/50 at fault. Me personally, I would have ruled for the defendant...illegally parked NUFF SAID!!!😕
Freakin employees just stand there like statues 😡😡😡😡
Peoples court dun dun dun
The plaintiff parked where he shouldn't have. Period. Is everything supposed to come to a halt because of him? He was irresponsible. He took his chances. He shouldn't have gotten a dime.
I'm confused, I thought he said he was picking something up from the other store that shares the loading dock. I don't think that's "illegal" parking.
Except that’s not the law 🤦♂️ Parking illegally does not entitle other people to damage the car. The correct legal procedure would be to have the illegally parked car ticketed and towed 🤦♂️
most judges would just award the deductable. The car should have gone through insurance....if he had any.
Can whoever edits these videos please edit out Harvey's segments? He is so annoying and totally irrelevant. He asks the same questions all the time, and just repeats what is just said at the beginning. Sorry, but he annoys me.😂😂😂