UAS A1-CM Furia/БпАК А1-СМ Фурія by @AthlonAvia

The UAS A1-CM “Furia” has been developed and manufactured by LLC SPC Athlon Avia since 2014. During this time, more than 100 systems of various modifications have been produced for the needs of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, the National Guard of Ukraine, and the Security Service of Ukraine. In 20192020, the UAS passed a full spectrum of state tests and was adopted by the Armed Forces of Ukraine.
Безпілотний авіаційний комплекс А1-СМ “Фурія” розроблений і виробляється ТОВ “НВП” Атлон Авіа” з 2014 року. За цей час вироблено понад 100 комплексів у різних модифікаціях для потреб Збройних Сил України, Національної гвардії України, Служби безпеки України. У 2019-2020 роках БпАК пройшов повний цикл Державних випробувань і був прийнятий на озброєння Збройних Сил України.
Details: bit.ly/3eXrzIc
Thank DIGITEC visual engineering for the visualization
За візуалізацію дякуємо студії DIGITEC visual engineering

[@jeffspinner6579]

I don't understand when you had more artillery, how your kill chain, all digital was beaten by Russian/DPR/LPR guys with pen and paper, reading off coord over the radio... wth?

[@TereshchenkoYuri]

There are 4 times more artillery in Russia than in Ukraine.
Ukrainian artillery is 30% caliber 152 mm.
Such shells ended in the first days of Russian military aggression. And in the world they are produced only by the aggressor - Russia.
The number of soldiers in the Russian army is 3 times more than in the Ukrainian one.
Russia has 5 times more tanks, 25 times more military aircraft, 33 times more combat helicopters...
A very similar bias with ammunition.
Russia had over 7,000 intermediate and short-range missiles at the time of the invasion.
In Ukraine, before the deliveries of Himars - not a single such missile.

[@jeffspinner6579]

@@TereshchenkoYuri Idt you are getting my point. The US howitzers are capable of operating way faster than what I've seen with Russian artillery crews still using radios, pen and paper, manual aiming, for counter battery fire (not even echoing the numbers received like I had to do with online medical control, btw, to ensure I heard what they said).
The US' _advertised_ ability is to have the counter battery radar automatically feed the detected firing positions to the howitzer targeting computers (the ukrainians HAVE a version of the digital systems home grown, at least they advertise that too), and the drones shove the correct powder amount and the artillery shell into the howitzer and fires. Even if the 777s or other NATO howitzers were NOT ready for prime time, breaking down way sooner than the Russian artillery systems (Pathetic).
IF that was the case that the Ukies had, the Russians irrespective of their overwhelming barrel and rocket artillery (TOS A1,2s/SMERCH, Tornado S's, freakin hell on earth shite) would have eventually been taken out because speed kills, even in personal life against another person being stupid trying to hurt you. I know.
During artillery duels, IF the NATO weapons worked as advertised, they would continuously win and kill way more enemy artillery than their artillery gets taken out, but that has not been the case because I've discovered NATO military weapons are shite, all advertising puffery and very little actual performance.

[@TereshchenkoYuri]

@@jeffspinner6579 Yes. I agree. In a way, it is.
NATO weapons, American, German and British, are not bad. But its effectiveness is exaggerated.
And, as this war shows, it is possible to fight effectively with both tanks and artillery of the 1960s, and artillery of the 2000s.
Here the question is only in the effectiveness of the use of specific weapons.
One of the best in the world, the 1st Guards Tank Army of Russia was destroyed on March 23-26 near the city of Trostyanets thanks to the well-coordinated work of ground and air reconnaissance, as well as artillery.
2 artillery brigades with Soviet 2S7 "Pion" 203 mm cannons simply shot to zero an entire tank division stationed on the outskirts of a small village.
The column of retreating tanks was fired upon by infantry units from mainly Soviet grenade launchers.
The surviving commander of the 13th tank regiment of this division, after returning to Russia and talking with the army command, shot himself...

[@jeffspinner6579]

@@TereshchenkoYuri k, so the Ukronazis are good, but most of the time the Russians are better? I wondered why the Russians withdrew from Sumy...
How about the 3rd Corps in reserve on the other side of the Kerch Straight Bridge. They are advertised as the best, most modern equipped corps.
They are conjectured to either move to take Mykolaiv then Odessa, first stopping the Ukie "counteroffensive" that has been having some success though potentially trivial...
I have concluded that though the Russia telegram and Russian MoD channel on telegram only lie by omission, it still has changed my perception of the facts on the ground, so I ain't happy atm given I realized this late in the war reporting. The West and Ukie side just lie and can be easily disproven... the Russians took me longer because like all the women in my life, they tended to lie by omission and was harder to detect.

[@TereshchenkoYuri]

@@jeffspinner6579 Strange approach.
For some reason, in your reasoning, you use the term "ukronazis", but at the same time, you do not use a similar term for the other side - "rusonazis".
Are you biased looking at the sides?
Or do you find such an analysis in the Russian propaganda media?
How then, in your opinion, to distinguish "ukronazis" from "Ukrainian military" or "Ukrainian civilian"?
You wonder why the Russians left Sumy...
Aren't you surprised why the Russians invaded the outskirts of Sumy at all?