I read a business book directed at women several years ago. One woman asked in a hypothetical situation if she could sell a purse she had made for $300 because it had taken her 10 hours to make it and she wanted to be paid $30 an hour. The answer was it had better be a pretty dang awesome purse, not just something she had struggled to knit for a while before getting it right.
one could therefore dare to say that the abstract classical economists were more platonist in their approach and Menger the one leaning on the aristotelian side in his realism
I read a business book directed at women several years ago. One woman asked in a hypothetical situation if she could sell a purse she had made for $300 because it had taken her 10 hours to make it and she wanted to be paid $30 an hour. The answer was it had better be a pretty dang awesome purse, not just something she had struggled to knit for a while before getting it right.
Value, there is value here.
one could therefore dare to say that the abstract classical economists were more platonist in their approach and Menger the one leaning on the aristotelian side in his realism
In what sense? Please explain more.