It is not often a gentleman comes along and shares his knowledge and is able to do so for us unlearned and also show the learned they still have more to learn. You are a blessing Joel. I truly enjoy watching your shares.
Excellent again Joel..I hope you survived the holidays well...Thank you for the explanation at such a level that even with an understanding it is always good to reinforce prior knowledge..Thanks again John
What I've noticed is that the more tuned two resonant bodies are, the more of their inductive and capacitive reactance is shared when in proximity, which fluffs with the tuning. You can mathematically approximate the tuning in a lot of ways, but it really is easier to just have a tuning nob because you never know how they'll combine in the real world to give you your frequency. Using super high frequency doubly helps because you can keep your resonators more distanced so they share less reactance yet are still coupled to the same near field area. It's strange how that works, you would normally imagine their power coupling linked in this same way, yet it doesn't appear to be so.
Thank you for this excellent demonstration. My question is, what technical problem is solved by knowing where the sweet spot is ? ie. is there a practical application for this knowledge ? You mention the high Q resonance effect which implies that the effect would be highly frequency dependent, which it probably is not. The sweet distance appears to be around one twentieth of a wavelength at 100MHz. This is very much within the near field, were it an EM wave. The wave impedance would be very much different to the 377 ohms of free space. Does this sweet distance change when the frequency is changed ? Since the effect is magnetic, I wonder what happens if the coils are arranged coaxially ? I imagine you used ferrite cores ? The resonant frequency is governed by the interaction of stray capacitance with the inductances. The long wires used in the experiment probably cause quite large changes in stray capacitance when they are moved. Keep up the great work ! I love your blog btw.
Thank you so much for posting this video - explains so much and helps get the sweet spot we are all looking for. If I understand correctly, you are transmitting 100 mega hertz because your coil is small diameter?
If I may suggest, add a third pulsating antenna to act as a deflection device to push stray air fields out of the way so that two of the three fields coupled in bursts and rotate back to the third and do causing a positive-positive energy effect that oscillates between each to extract energy from the Aether. The secret in my opinion that Tesla was utilizing was to have three wires of the self-similar polarity to cause rectification to the Aether which we see in a spark gap array. You can use spherical neodymium magnetics to achieve similar effects… let us know what your experiences with this are? Thanks Joel - you’re a really GREAT Genius!!! Thanks for all your hard work!!!😊
Hey Joel you should pick up a nanovna if you ever have a chance. A very cool tool for antenna analysis and much more only about 80 bucks and can do what this meter does and more 😊
its worth shaving off some insulation every turn but but separate the next shave by 90 degree for better separation . Then you can tap off different parts of the inductance for the sweet spot or at least you will be able to home in on the best henry level
"Magnetic Resonance is an open system and the conservation of energy laws do not apply...magnetic waves which are an open system...when resonate, unlimited duplicates from this one source are available...When electrons are spun they radiate flux, being electro and magnetic. The electro dies a heat death when used. Not so for the magnetic which can be amplified to infinity, radiating through space as common radio transmission...Note that the magnetic wave and it’s source is not depleted in any way, but produces useful electrical energy. This is Energy, free for the taking, just as wind turns the windmill...This flux is not diminished and therefore can replicate many times and not be diminished...magnetic Waves which spin the remote electrons duplicates the original energy source without reducing in any way the source...The method of collecting Energy is a function of Human ignorance. Otherwise the Energy is Free just like the rain and the fish in the stream...Therefore the key to unlimited energy is Magnetic Resonance" --Don Smith
Am i understanding correctly?.. you're sending very little power through your tool, and picking up also some e on the rec. What is the ratio between power sent to power harness? Prob not 1:1 but even at 1:x if you could make 2x receivers, would you get 2x the e power? Not having conservation in an open system is wild.. let me know i catch your drift
Now let's define each sentence in coherent language and in light of known terminology and known and obscure equations. 'When the electron is spun it radiates flux'. Try to make it concrete. :)
A few questions, would having it in a much higher rf frequency result in a bigger field of operation? If so what freq do you need to send magnetism 50+m away? Secondly, would tweaking the freq or phase cause a change in the swr? If you could have data transfer ota between the two , you can maybe make adjustments to the freq or phase in rt to hone in on resonance. Ideally the change should happen in the recievers independently. Like active noise cancellation.. active resonance matching. Lastly, am i understanding correctly?.. you're sending very little power through your tool, and picking up also some e on the rec. What is the ratio between power sent to power harness? Prob not 1:1 but even at 1:x if you could make 2x receivers, would you get 2x the e power? Not having conservation in an open system is wild.. let me know i catch your drift
two methods you can increase the Q on RX for higher volts, this is not inductive mutual coupled transformer action so current strength don't go down so you get more power like that. Or carefully place multiple coils along the sweet spot well placed and measured so they don't interfere this will be minimum at resonance to begin with. The higher the frequency the tighter the reactive near field zone. So too high you may not have enough field room area for all your rx antennas to be near.
Am i understanding correctly?.. you're sending very little power through your tool, and picking up also some e on the rec. What is the ratio between power sent to power harness? Prob not 1:1 but even at 1:x if you could make 2x receivers, would you get 2x the e power? Not having conservation in an open system is wild.. let me know i catch your drift
Подключи второй луч осциллографа к катушки генератора и посмотри сигнал. И ты будешь удивлён что происходит обмен энергии и катушки работают в противофазе относительно друг друга
It is not often a gentleman comes along and shares his knowledge and is able to do so for us unlearned and also show the learned they still have more to learn. You are a blessing Joel. I truly enjoy watching your shares.
Excellent again Joel..I hope you survived the holidays well...Thank you for the explanation at such a level that even with an understanding it is always good to reinforce prior knowledge..Thanks again John
Thank you Joel, for thorough investigation and explanation of this mind-blowing phenomena
your insights are always a treat
What I've noticed is that the more tuned two resonant bodies are, the more of their inductive and capacitive reactance is shared when in proximity, which fluffs with the tuning. You can mathematically approximate the tuning in a lot of ways, but it really is easier to just have a tuning nob because you never know how they'll combine in the real world to give you your frequency.
Using super high frequency doubly helps because you can keep your resonators more distanced so they share less reactance yet are still coupled to the same near field area. It's strange how that works, you would normally imagine their power coupling linked in this same way, yet it doesn't appear to be so.
Very educational Joel and thank you!
Thank you for this excellent demonstration. My question is, what technical problem is solved by knowing where the sweet spot is ? ie. is there a practical application for this knowledge ? You mention the high Q resonance effect which implies that the effect would be highly frequency dependent, which it probably is not. The sweet distance appears to be around one twentieth of a wavelength at 100MHz. This is very much within the near field, were it an EM wave. The wave impedance would be very much different to the 377 ohms of free space. Does this sweet distance change when the frequency is changed ? Since the effect is magnetic, I wonder what happens if the coils are arranged coaxially ? I imagine you used ferrite cores ? The resonant frequency is governed by the interaction of stray capacitance with the inductances. The long wires used in the experiment probably cause quite large changes in stray capacitance when they are moved. Keep up the great work ! I love your blog btw.
Thank you so much for posting this video - explains so much and helps get the sweet spot we are all looking for.
If I understand correctly, you are transmitting 100 mega hertz because your coil is small diameter?
yes just for simplicity and sake of this demo. No need to read into it for a secret frequency range. Was just convenient for the demo.
If I may suggest, add a third pulsating antenna to act as a deflection device to push stray air fields out of the way so that two of the three fields coupled in bursts and rotate back to the third and do causing a
positive-positive energy effect that oscillates between each to extract energy from the Aether. The secret in my opinion that Tesla was utilizing was to have three wires of the self-similar polarity to cause rectification to the Aether which we see in a spark gap array. You can use spherical neodymium magnetics to achieve similar effects… let us know what your experiences with this are? Thanks Joel - you’re a really GREAT Genius!!! Thanks for all your hard work!!!😊
Are the blue wires acting like a type of ground plane or more like radiating elements? Cool video, thanks.
Hey Joel you should pick up a nanovna if you ever have a chance. A very cool tool for antenna analysis and much more only about 80 bucks and can do what this meter does and more 😊
AWSOME BROTHER MORE POWER TO YOU THIS 25 MAY YOU GET STRONGER IN MIND BODY SPIRIT AS YOU SHARE THE LIGHT 👍👍👍👍👍💡🙏✅🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉SALUTE TO YOU JOEL
its worth shaving off some insulation every turn but but separate the next shave by 90 degree for better separation . Then you can tap off different parts of the inductance for the sweet spot or at least you will be able to home in on the best henry level
Bro you just blew my mind! Major click moment for me
Do you think this is what Moray might have been doing, only using astronomical rf sources?
Only half way through but the windings: if you flip the other way clockwise anti clockwise?
"Magnetic Resonance is an open system and the conservation of energy laws do not apply...magnetic waves which are an open system...when resonate, unlimited duplicates from this one source are available...When electrons are spun they radiate flux, being electro and magnetic. The electro dies a heat death when used. Not so for the magnetic which can be amplified to infinity, radiating through space as common radio transmission...Note that the magnetic wave and it’s source is not depleted in any way, but produces useful electrical energy. This is Energy, free for the taking, just as wind turns the windmill...This flux is not diminished and therefore can replicate many times and not be diminished...magnetic Waves which spin the remote electrons duplicates the original energy source without reducing in any way the source...The method of collecting Energy is a function of Human ignorance. Otherwise the Energy is Free just like the rain and the fish in the stream...Therefore the key to unlimited energy is Magnetic Resonance" --Don Smith
Am i understanding correctly?.. you're sending very little power through your tool, and picking up also some e on the rec. What is the ratio between power sent to power harness? Prob not 1:1 but even at 1:x if you could make 2x receivers, would you get 2x the e power? Not having conservation in an open system is wild.. let me know i catch your drift
Now let's define each sentence in coherent language and in light of known terminology and known and obscure equations.
'When the electron is spun it radiates flux'. Try to make it concrete. :)
A few questions, would having it in a much higher rf frequency result in a bigger field of operation? If so what freq do you need to send magnetism 50+m away?
Secondly, would tweaking the freq or phase cause a change in the swr? If you could have data transfer ota between the two , you can maybe make adjustments to the freq or phase in rt to hone in on resonance. Ideally the change should happen in the recievers independently. Like active noise cancellation.. active resonance matching.
Lastly, am i understanding correctly?.. you're sending very little power through your tool, and picking up also some e on the rec. What is the ratio between power sent to power harness? Prob not 1:1 but even at 1:x if you could make 2x receivers, would you get 2x the e power? Not having conservation in an open system is wild.. let me know i catch your drift
two methods you can increase the Q on RX for higher volts, this is not inductive mutual coupled transformer action so current strength don't go down so you get more power like that. Or carefully place multiple coils along the sweet spot well placed and measured so they don't interfere this will be minimum at resonance to begin with. The higher the frequency the tighter the reactive near field zone. So too high you may not have enough field room area for all your rx antennas to be near.
Am i understanding correctly?.. you're sending very little power through your tool, and picking up also some e on the rec. What is the ratio between power sent to power harness? Prob not 1:1 but even at 1:x if you could make 2x receivers, would you get 2x the e power? Not having conservation in an open system is wild.. let me know i catch your drift
Подключи второй луч осциллографа к катушки генератора и посмотри сигнал. И ты будешь удивлён что происходит обмен энергии и катушки работают в противофазе относительно друг друга
❤
👍
Thanks for your valuable content, I sent you an email could you answer me thanks
Please, it's not any more, and not "no more".