Atheism didn't exist in those times you moron, they worship they're Greek Gods. Philosophers also religious because that is the rule of Ancient Greek Philosopher, if there is a reason, there is faith.
Some fossil dragonflies had 28in wingspan. Back when the earth had an overabundance of oxygen. O2 depleted over time to what it is now (thus the 2in dragonflies we see today.) So, animals change over time in dna, body structures, etc... they change along with environment, air quality, however the earth changes. Old species die off creating new ones. We've seen this in recorded history. Am I correct?
@ExplainersEnigma my point is, that what "new species" we're finding today aren't really exactly new, but adaptations of past prehistoric ones that had to adapt and change due to living conditions of earth. Today's living conditions are terrible and they're having to adapt and change once again. But this time it's more of a toxic and violent environment which might make for some very nasty predators, viruses and extremely venomous things.
I believe in an evolution fotm of simplisim, where a simple organisms has the most highest chance to survive and adapt than complex ones especially simple organisms can't orchestrated they're doom, primitive species like prokaryotes are more simple and had higher chance to survive and Targedrates, a simple microscopic arthropod, can survive. A complex species like mankind has a higher chance of getting Doomed in everytime.
The issue I have is with your title. You're lumping in things that are not theory. Some could be considered hypotheses while the others are just mythology or religious conjecture. Use better terminology. Religious ideology does not hypotheses make, and certainly not theory. Never lump science and religion together or you're going to have a bad time.
@ExplainersEnigma I don't approach information like most. Everything can be relevant and useful. Cross application can occur in seemingly unrelated fields. Accuracy of information presented in a concise way with no more and no less than to give the exact information you wish to be understood. For example, Sun Tsu recommended clear and concise orders so as not to generate confusion or give too much leeway to those under your command. As another example, you could consider this to be likened to a teaching found in the Book of Five Rings. In the Book of Five Rings, it is stated that there are two ways people approach the haste of their movements. One is to simply rush in your movements. The other is to do the movement correctly at the speed necessary to accomplish the goal. The rushed movement is riddled with mistakes and the need to quickly rebound from mistakes or risk injury or worse. The practiced movement, done correctly, will always outpace a harried opponent. You don't have to move quickly to be fast. You don't have to generalize to attract an audience.
You simplified Process Structuralism too much, it states that the physical laws of this universe are the reason why only humanoids have a tendency to evolve intelectually and form a rational conscience. So, if humans would have evoluated from dolphins or other intelligent species that are adaptable to envirionment.
Another useful and informative video.
Lamarckism based as always. Epigenetics are worth mentioning in this context.
great work! keep it up
Ancient Atheism is crazy
Atheism didn't exist in those times you moron, they worship they're Greek Gods.
Philosophers also religious because that is the rule of Ancient Greek Philosopher, if there is a reason, there is faith.
Fixism makes a lot of sense.
/s
Some fossil dragonflies had 28in wingspan. Back when the earth had an overabundance of oxygen. O2 depleted over time to what it is now (thus the 2in dragonflies we see today.) So, animals change over time in dna, body structures, etc... they change along with environment, air quality, however the earth changes. Old species die off creating new ones. We've seen this in recorded history. Am I correct?
@@stm5578 bro, 28in dragonflies? Holy moly, plays perfectly into my phobia of insects. 😅😅
@ExplainersEnigma my point is, that what "new species" we're finding today aren't really exactly new, but adaptations of past prehistoric ones that had to adapt and change due to living conditions of earth. Today's living conditions are terrible and they're having to adapt and change once again. But this time it's more of a toxic and violent environment which might make for some very nasty predators, viruses and extremely venomous things.
I believe in an evolution fotm of simplisim, where a simple organisms has the most highest chance to survive and adapt than complex ones especially simple organisms can't orchestrated they're doom, primitive species like prokaryotes are more simple and had higher chance to survive and Targedrates, a simple microscopic arthropod, can survive.
A complex species like mankind has a higher chance of getting Doomed in everytime.
Interesting take, thanks for watching Armando
The issue I have is with your title. You're lumping in things that are not theory. Some could be considered hypotheses while the others are just mythology or religious conjecture. Use better terminology. Religious ideology does not hypotheses make, and certainly not theory. Never lump science and religion together or you're going to have a bad time.
Fair enough, still wanted to cover all the angles. Hope you still got some value out of the video.
@ExplainersEnigma I don't approach information like most. Everything can be relevant and useful. Cross application can occur in seemingly unrelated fields. Accuracy of information presented in a concise way with no more and no less than to give the exact information you wish to be understood. For example, Sun Tsu recommended clear and concise orders so as not to generate confusion or give too much leeway to those under your command. As another example, you could consider this to be likened to a teaching found in the Book of Five Rings. In the Book of Five Rings, it is stated that there are two ways people approach the haste of their movements. One is to simply rush in your movements. The other is to do the movement correctly at the speed necessary to accomplish the goal. The rushed movement is riddled with mistakes and the need to quickly rebound from mistakes or risk injury or worse. The practiced movement, done correctly, will always outpace a harried opponent. You don't have to move quickly to be fast. You don't have to generalize to attract an audience.
You simplified Process Structuralism too much, it states that the physical laws of this universe are the reason why only humanoids have a tendency to evolve intelectually and form a rational conscience. So, if humans would have evoluated from dolphins or other intelligent species that are adaptable to envirionment.
Yeah we needed to simplify, otherwise all the theories won't fit
Cool
I like that Lamarckism is just evolution with less steps.
Epigenetically, it's somewhat true