Higgs Boson 2016
Вставка
- Опубліковано 15 лис 2016
- The Higgs boson burst into the public arena on July 4, 2012, when scientists working at the CERN laboratory announced the particle’s discovery. However the initial discovery was a bit tentative, with the need to verify that the discovered particle was, indeed, the Higgs boson. In this video, Fermilab’s Dr. Don Lincoln looks at the data from the perspective of 2016 and shows that more recent analyses further supports the idea that the Higgs boson is what was discovered.
The data presented in this video can be seen in a technical form in this paper: cds.cern.ch/record/2158863/fil.... Figure 19 is a more accurate version. - Наука та технологія
Your each and every video is awesome!!!
yep
I Agree. Dr. Lincoln is amazing. I am planning a trip from KATL to KMDW just to tour the facility this summer.
"Neutrinos: very small" #legit
The best Particle Physics and Astrophysics channel ever for me!!! You explain complex terms so simply but with exact preciseness...your channel deserves more subscriptions and likes!!! Please keep making videos
- Thank You!!
A Scholar, Gent and Sportsman.
Always great videos from Mr Lincoln.
Cheers Dr. Don Lincoln, and thank you for taking us along with you in your quest to understand the fundamental constituents of our world!
You are amazing! If I had this in high school I would have continued to study physics ! But what you do to us masses in breaking down the complex world of quantum physics is like someone getting to read a book for the first time!
The discovery of the Higgs field and its associated particle...I count as one of the most important events for all people that happened during my lifetime.
Well, I think the history books will look back on climate change, not on the Higgs, to be honest.
what about that summer in 2013, where you got 3 for 2 at Mikes Chicken Shack?
@@carpii damn it, missed it!
Yay, a Fermilab video. This is the best birthday gift I could have. I love the videos and I'll wait excited for the fermions/bosons video ♥️🌚
They need to simplify these complicated theories into spermions and boobieons, ya know. jk
Don Lincoln does such a great job explaining this very complex stuff to even us lay people who just want to learn for personal reasons. Cheers to that. 🎉
If you was my high school physics professor I would be an physician today for sure. I discovered in my 30's that I enjoy physics and astrophysics, in high school actually I didn't understand it because no one didn't explained how it works, they just provided us formula for calculations and that's it.
In the meantime please work on your English.
@Neil Rusling The answer is curriculum and exams on aforementioned curriculum.
They teach you the stuff society has deemed useful.
Mostly pragmatic stuff like V=IR etc.
I didn't encounter the Maxwell field equations until Uni and at that point my maths wasn't up to the job anymore so I had to drop my 3rd Science; Physics and concentrate on Computing.
Honestly the jump between Scottish Higher Physics and 1st year Uni Physics was crazy. It was crazy in computing too but I had much more of a handle on that.
I still love physics and appreciate the pop-sci explanations of it on you tube hence why I'm here.
Luv and Peace.
"If you WERE my high school professor, I would be A PHYSICIST today for sure."
- and -
"no one explained".
PHYSICIAN is a medical doctor.
PHYSICIST is the word you meant.
Cheers to you Dr. L!!! Y'all are amazing!
Wonderful overview for the public. Great presenter. Why not show this to 13 year olds? Scientific ideas are fun, easy and natural. Spend a week putting Higgs-Boson together for them is a gift that will keep giving for a lifetime. Glad I found this series. Thanks.
You're the best Don. Happy New Year.
Dear Professor Lincoln, Thanks for the great explanations.
This explanation was very helpful. Thank you for providing information a layperson can understand.
Cheers indeed!
Thank you so much for this channel!
More I hear more interesting it becomes. Always good practice and productice to hear about science and technology.
This is a top notch lesson in the scientific method of verifying theory with data.
It was good to get an overview on how theortical physics meets experimental physics, for once!
Thank God and science for people like you. Keep up the good work!
Brief and precised explaination after 60 years of theoretical predictions and experimentally found it and complete the standard model. This is just the beginning of 21st century and future scientists are awaiting for new breakthrough !!!
As a non-physician, I usually enjoy your videos that help me understand a little some physic principles.
This time, I've almost understood nothing (and I was familiar with the higgs field/boson theory).
There was too much new concepts :s
But thanks for your great job anyway!
I will have to say that Dr. Lincoln has been the best presenter of this stuff by far. He has a gift to "dumb" it down to where anyone can get the gist of it. Thank you!
Glad to participate with your ingenuity Sir, of course, at my Golden Age level.
You guys must celebrate often! Popping a cork like that takes a practised hand! Great channel Dr!
I love this guy!
Standard Model Article on their website is a must read
Cheers Dr. Don lincoln . You are the reason why I spend lots of ,y free time on your website. And it`s because it is always interesz^^ting what You are telling us there. I am actually a biologist but became really interested in particle pysics after I visited the Large Hadron collider in Genevy with my youngest son. He is currently doing his work as an apprentice at famous watchmaker Bucherer in Lucerne. Hope he continues studiying so well. love your videos. Because to cite You "Physics is Everything"!
Thank you SO much for these videos - you saved my life and grade
Congratulations!
So nicely explained. Short and simple .thanks
You, good sir, are an excellent teacher.
I remember that day, it's was amazing! Thank 2016 brought us the gravtational waves, a great discovery too.
you are back
Physics ROCKS! Awesome people! Thank you!
Well nothing rocks more than Geology.
"Since when you've become an expert in theoretical physicist?"
"Less than 10 minutes ago"
Star Trek Theory how is it fake
hey sir how would the energy field in higgs boson will interact to the particles of antimatter and what would be its result
Can you please make a play list with only talks from Dr. Don and put them in the most logical order to watch?
Daan Luining yes My request also, although do your best because I know there may not be perfect logical order.
Wonderful lecture !!!
Thanks for breaking it down for the mathematically challenged! Love your videos
mathematically challenged lmao.
"Who isnt?" Lol
Amazing video, very well explained
Found myself thinking that bosons are like the 'pop' in soda. Ie the idea that a gas could be dissolved into a solution, and released when excited by a nucleation point is similar to the function of bosons in an atomic structure - like photons in an xray. They're the hidden force ('pop') holding everything we know as 'soda' together. When excited by an external force (or maybe a stray electron) the photon becomes excited and ejects itself from the structure, leaving behind a slightly altered and 'flatter' soda.
Can Higgs field explain gravity f(m, d)?
How does Higgs field fit in when we say gravity is the effect of space-time distortion due to mass?
If we write, Higgs field -> Mass -> Gravity, it looks like Higgs field can explain gravity.
Interaction of particles with Higgs field causes space-time distortion and hence gravity?
There is no label on the vertical axis of graph at 5:15. Did I hear Don say it's the rate that Higgs decays into a particle with a give mass?
So, if I understand correctly, the Higgs field is like an ether/field/medium that transfers mass to these sub atomic particles depending on the degree of interaction exerted by the former on latter?
Great video! Thanks for the knowledge so well broken down :)
I remember the discovery of the Higgs boson particle very well. It was on the cover of an issue of New Scientist (slightly embarrassed now that I used to be so into that magazine), where, predictably, it was referred to as the "God particle". I read it while sitting in a car outside my local supermarket and drinking a Coke.
7:12 I agree and what a great statement: "we scientists must accept the truth, whatever that may be......
dear mr Don Lincoln, do you realy mean that when you said that ?
What is the Y axis in reference to on your graph?
Cheers, Doctor!
Can the graviton if it is ever verified further complete the standard model as it is not yet unified with the others?
3:48. "You often hear people say that Higgs bosons interact more with heavy particles ." Yeah, all the time! Especially at family get-togethers! Just found your channel. Don't understand any of it, Lovin' it!
Excellent stuff !
THANK YOU... PROFESSOR LINCOLN...!!!
2 questions, Any idea about how the higgs boson interacts with other higgs particles to create a field? 2. How does electron volts relate to mass in relation to the higgs particle?
great info!
Dr. Don is right on
Still wondering what mass is. Should particles that interact more with the Higgs Boson slow down? if so how this motion is related to the mass of an object? I guess they build up the inertia of an object, but then what about the gravity interaction? :(
Does the Higgs field contain Superstrings or visa versa?
Good narration on Higgs-Bose particles. You narrative hardly mentions Dr. Satyendra Bose's contribution that leads to Higgs-Bose theory.
The Top quark is heavier than the Higgs boson and yet the Higgs decays into Tops? (among others)
From Wiki: Production Because top quarks are very massive, large amounts of energy are needed to create one.
I hate to use this description (since you really need the math to understand it), but you could say that that energy is converted into the observed mass.
Love your subtle coolness in your presentation, but for me, Physics need no champagne...it drives me high everytime!!!
I feel the same way. The excitement from discovery fuels my brain chemistry
Can you make a video explaining proton and neutron interconversion in deep also baryogenisis. I hope you will help me.
That would be weak interaction.
I wonder what spin has any correlation with the higg field.
Does the difference in spin have any physical meaning for bosons? If yes then kindly explain how?
Is it possible for a particle say a proton, that is moving linearly, can deviate from linear path and take angular motion, without taking a 'Pause in Motion'. Is it proton that consists of mass and energy that is in motion due to any one form of energy, stops for a fraction of time and in process lose all its energy, which either converts to more mass of that proton or that energy is given to some another mass, or that energy goes into ocean of energy that exists in vacuum and after taking an angle of some degree regain its energy back.
If all these particles in our Universe obey a rule of 'Pause in Motion' than it can conclude that time for every particles in Universe takes a pause for fraction of period. Now if two atoms {made of three different particles} are in same states than it is almost impossible to detect 'Pause Time' of one atom with help of another atom and vice versa. So any observing instrument used for this purpose also has 'Pause Time' same as the object that is observed, when both are in same states.
But when a particle accelerate towards the speed of light, the 'Pause Time' decreases. and once it reaches at a speed of light e.g. photon and neutrino the 'Pause Time' vanishes. Now for a particle moving at a speed of light, the time stops relative to the particles which are slow in motion. Keeping this in mind we come to another conclusion for time.
The more the 'Pause Time' taken by particle the fast the time runs for it and the less the 'Pause Time' taken by Particle the time runs slow for it.
my man dr don poppin bottles for the higgs boson
sir is there posible way to extract the higgs bosson for further analysis?
Sir I adore every video you make about particle physics, myself being a junior particle physicist I learn and understand lot of things thanks to your clear explanations.
But please, next time open a champagne bottle correctly in order to avoid any possible cork-path right to your eye.
Kind regards 🙏
Higgs give mass. Mass bends space time & makes gravity. Gravitons must be stopped by Higgs field like WZ & fermions, unlike Photons. Gravitons are bigger than Photons or Gluons in whatever quantum terms apply [spin or whatever etc.]. This small size fits the weakness of gravity. Gravitons obviously don't interact radioactively or electromagnetically. Theres a window to look for gravitons. In that window, we find gravitational waves on a huge scale and maybe WIMPS. WIMPS barely interact so we cant make a size judgment on them but due to theory we know they are quite big as particles go. Maybe a quantum split experiment using the same stuff we use to try to find WIMPs, but obvs scaled down, as detectors on the end in the presence of a known change in gravitational waves will find gravitons??
Relativistic quantum mechanics is a thing. The math is beyond anything I've studied.
I would like to buy some bosons, are they expensive ?
Wait. I didn't catch whether you answered this: does the higgs field give mass to fermions too?
Leo Staley yes it did
How can the Higgs boson decay into a top quark when it has lower mass/energy. And why do the top quark have such a high mass?
Might this ought to help with your second question ua-cam.com/video/RIg1Vh7uPyw/v-deo.html
kinetic energy
A very good evening sir
Thankyou very much for giving us information about higgs boson
I want to ask of mass is increasing with increase in speed of object, does it means the interaction of object with higgs field is increasing, if it's so then y does photon has 0 mass
Abi Singla I believe the high speed mass is inertial mass and not rest mass. Inertial mass represents how much more energy you need to accelerate an object. Rest mass is the only mass that the Higgs field creates. The photon does not use the formula E=mc2 but a variation of that which includes only the momentum not mass, as its energy is fixed for a certain momentum and vice versa momentum for a fixed energy.
Excellent..... thanks.
dr. don, ok, so I am made up of higgs bosons that pop up out of a higgs field, so as I move through space, do my bosons just skate along the field, or do they disapear and pop up on the field as I move through/ along it?
😂
awesome!!!!
as always 😉
Very interesting. Now try an electron accelerator at high energy and see what happens.
Thank you.
yes
What is the y-axis of the graph that's shown starting at ua-cam.com/video/1AamFQWwh94/v-deo.html?
I am confused by your use of the word “decay.” How does anything with 125 GeV “decay” into something that has 172 GeV?
idk
if it is moving real fast
@@nmarbletoe8210 Thanks. Sincerely. That has to be the most enlightened answer EVER! It’s no wonder why I majored in Liberal Arts. Again, Thanks!!!
Is mass just a measurement of how much a particle interacts with the Higgs field?
Jim Honkos yes some particles consisting of quarks and leptons and W and Z bosons. Not true for larger particles like protons and neutrons which are “combinations” of the other particles. In this case the energy holding the particles together is the measured mass.
I would have liked the video if they had humored us by telling what the Y-axis of the graph stood for. .
Everything looks like a line on a log-log plot. Hopefully we run the test for another few years.
I wonder if standard model will ever be complete... The way I see it, we will have to invent more and more particles to account for ever smaller anomalies in the model. Kind of like a perturbation theory, where each interaction is a superposition of infinite number of ever less likely interactions.
Does higgs field give mass to gluons ? Is it done by higgs mechanism ?
Gluons are massless.
Hi how come the Gamma and photon symbols are the same?
I appreciate the term “bandaid theory”
How does magnetism effect the Higgs filed? Gravity? It would seem that wave particle duality and the uncertainty that goes along with it... would suggest perhaps the presence of another, yet unknown field. This could account for the "grainularity" of light.
It doesn't. As war as we know, the fields operate independently. Although they sometimes conflict, like gravity affecting particles until they are really really close, then the strong force takes over.
great vid
Thanks for the video ❤😍❤😍❤😍
You should have looked at the glass with disdain, set it down, and chugged the bottle.
~Thank You
If it is the interaction with the higgs field that gives these fundamental particles their masses then I guess the question I have is this:
Why do some particles interact more with the higgs field than others? In the analogy of the higgs field as water, the particles must differ in their 'streamlined-ness' to explain their differing interaction with the water. Do we know the quality that is causally responsible for this difference in interaction, if it is not size?
unknown!
Well nice video again, I'm not english but I understand it easily ! I just didn't get what the y-axis is refering to (at 5.14), if someone could explain me :)
Maxime Sloart darude-Sandstorm
I think it’s probability but not sure. So if the number is .01 then for every 1000 interaction events (scattering) then 10 particles are produced. Someone can check me on that.
Mass in kilograms = Charge in Coulombs squared x 10 to the power -7, divided by distance between two charges. So, where did Higgs Boson come into this equation for mass ?
I'd say it came out of the math used to describe the "transformation" or decay of one particle into another.
So how can a top quark weigh more than an atom with 79 protons, and even more neutrons? Should they not each contain quarks, and with top quarks popping in, would that not tip the scale drastically? Think I'm missing something.
A top quark doesn't combined with other quarks to form matter. They are very short lived and can only be studied by creating them using the Large Hadron Collider. They were predicted by the Standard Model, which is why we knew how and where to look for them, but beyond that they are not believed to play any part in the building blocks of matter.
It's kind of like those highly unstable elements at the very bottom of the Periodic Table. They're not stable enough to be useful for anything since they decay into other particles almost instantly, but we know they can exist, and we know how to create them, if only for a fraction of a second.
I'm not a physicist. What's this about Higgs bosons "decaying" into other particles. First I heard of this. Is there some video explaining this?
Cheers !
Nicely said at 4:00