The Secret Mission for Pearl Harbor Revenge - Operation Vengeance

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 5 вер 2024
  • NEW CHANNEL!! Subscribe to Dark Skies: bit.ly/dark5skies
    Watch Project Have Blue - Lockheed's First Stealth Fighter: • Project Have Blue - Lo...
    Enraged over the sneak-attack on Pearl Harbor, just going to war with Japan over was not going to be enough to calm the fury of the United States. The American Government believed that the clearest course of action would be to get direct revenge on the man who planned the strike. With help from Japanese-Americans, the U.S. intelligence community launched Operation Vengeance and began to track the movement of Japanese Marshal Admiral Isoroku Yamamoto across the Pacific Theater. When the Magic code breaking unit intercepted his itinerary in April of 1943, FDR himself allegedly gave the simple order [QUOTE], “Get Yamamoto.” A squadron of P-38 Lightnings was quickly sent aloft to take down the Admiral...

КОМЕНТАРІ • 1,1 тис.

  • @DarkDocs
    @DarkDocs  4 роки тому +127

    Subscribe to Dark Skies: bit.ly/dark5skies
    Watch Have Blue - The Secret Stealth Prototype: ua-cam.com/video/SG58fU85hVE/v-deo.html
    Excited for this new channel. Aviation photography and plane spotting are two of my favorite hobbies. Aviation topics won't be disappearing from Dark Docs, but the focus on Docs will be more on missions and a little less on hardware.

    • @boxedfender4810
      @boxedfender4810 4 роки тому +5

      PeaRl harbor.

    • @Nicoland87
      @Nicoland87 4 роки тому +4

      Pearl harbor

    • @oldpsboy
      @oldpsboy 4 роки тому +1

      Wait it say it came 1 hour the comments is 2

    • @trevorwalk3964
      @trevorwalk3964 4 роки тому +1

      Spelling mistake in your title

    • @dandeeteeyem2170
      @dandeeteeyem2170 4 роки тому +1

      The "sneak attack" on Pearl Harbor.. Pfft. In Melbourne's War Memorial in Australia, there is an exhibit detailing the Australian signals intelligence officer who intercepted Japanese communications, and relayed warnings about the impending attacks to U.S - TO NO AVAIL. How does it feel to understand that your government let those attacks happen so they could rally the American public into joining an unpopular war. False Flags, propaganda... You are treated like fodder by your own government and tricked into fighting unjust wars ALL THE TIME. For empire, the banksters, for Zionists. Wake the fuck up - you wouldn't have a single enemy on the planet if you just got the fuck out of other people's countries and spent your military budget on education, ending poverty, and redistribution of wealth of your top 1 percent. It's so simple it's infuriating.

  • @juliovictormanuelschaeffer8370
    @juliovictormanuelschaeffer8370 4 роки тому +693

    The irony is, Yamamoto *knew* Japan had already signed its epitaph after Midway.

    • @Alhy-ls3dv
      @Alhy-ls3dv 4 роки тому +129

      After pearl harbour you mean, he commented it as a waking up of the sleeping giant

    • @juliovictormanuelschaeffer8370
      @juliovictormanuelschaeffer8370 4 роки тому +67

      @@Alhy-ls3dv yeah. Kinda sad actually. At least he didn't live to see how his nation would spend the next 4 years fucking it up.

    • @danman1809
      @danman1809 4 роки тому +28

      @@juliovictormanuelschaeffer8370 he would have been proud of the transistor radios in 60's n sushi restaurants now.

    • @juliovictormanuelschaeffer8370
      @juliovictormanuelschaeffer8370 4 роки тому +4

      @@danman1809 yeah.

    • @andrewtaylor940
      @andrewtaylor940 4 роки тому +84

      Both those who vilify Yamamoto and those who view him as the reluctant soldier get him wrong. He felt kicking the hornets nest of America was a bad idea, and that Japan would have been better off simply seizing the South Pacific and not starting a war on two fronts. But he was still a brutal Japanese Nationalist who wanted to kill Americans and push them from the Pacific. He just wanted Japan’s resource needs secured first. Unlike the others in the high command, he intended to use Midway as a launch point to invade Hawaii. All of his colleagues thought that was insane. The further East Japan pushed into the Pacific, the harder it became to defend. Halsey had really rattled them throughout ‘42 with his Carriers ability to randomly strike anywhere in the Pacific and disappear, only to show up a day or two elsewhere 1000 miles away brutalizing a different island garrison. Pre Midway America had not yet worked out massing Carrier Air Power or the true ability of Carriers to project sustained power, that would not come until ‘43. They mainly used Carriers as quick strike raiders. But Halsey and his crews were very very good at quick strike raiding. And it really spooked the bulk of the Japanese Admiralty.

  • @TheTarrMan
    @TheTarrMan 4 роки тому +742

    This is the type of history they don't each in schools. Thank you for your work.

    • @Four-of-Six
      @Four-of-Six 4 роки тому +41

      Nope..... the type of history they don't teach in schools are....here we go ; *Closing the borders for Jews and sending them back to Germany before and during WW2 by the USA, because of the "America First" policy.... *The segregated USA fighting Nazi Germany, a country with no segregation laws.....*The denying of coloured labourers working in the American war industry during WW2...... *Forced sterilisation of civilians by the US government from the 1920's til 1950's in rural parts of the country ( Appalachians) because they were considered "retarded" but all they lacked was decent education..... *The forced taking of American Native children and sending them to boarding schools, teaching them the "white man's way" and forbidden to speak their native tongue. While in the same time train Navajo men to be code talkers using their Native language in WW2 Pacific...... * The eugenics theories that were "invented" and used in the USA in the early 1900's, decades before Hitler used them.... *The 87000 documented sexual abuse and rape cases, of men, women and children, by US service men during WW2 in France and by the US occupied German territories. And other Allied war crimes.... *The ill treatment of German POW's in the Rheinwiessenlager by the US..... *The real reason of the Marshall plan..... *The testing of nuclear weapons by the US in the Pacific on natives islanders....... Just to name a few.....

    • @jackgargan8896
      @jackgargan8896 4 роки тому +8

      TheTarrMan instead that teach us boring medieval shit

    • @jonikyro1168
      @jonikyro1168 4 роки тому +1

      Four of Six, Tertiary Adjunct of Unimatrix 03 what is the real reason of the marshall plan

    • @insaneapples1559
      @insaneapples1559 4 роки тому +7

      It's almost like WW2 is just one unit out of dozens that teachers can only scratch the surface of in a History class.

    • @LynxOnyx-LynxGraphics
      @LynxOnyx-LynxGraphics 4 роки тому +1

      Four of Six, Tertiary Adjunct of Unimatrix 03 A lot of what you said is taught in history, especially APUSH

  • @ianmacfarlane1241
    @ianmacfarlane1241 4 роки тому +657

    Quite sad that there was a dispute over the credit for the kill, given that no-one knew which of the two aircraft Yamamoto was on.
    Everyone on the mission was responsible for its success, whether they were part of the attack formation or part of the cover formation.

    • @ronfullerton3162
      @ronfullerton3162 4 роки тому +28

      So right! Shooting down the Bettys would of been more difficult with Zeros in the way.

    • @andrewtaylor940
      @andrewtaylor940 4 роки тому +27

      And especially since both pilots did in fact fire on the plane. Why would they go on about it for half a century?

    • @ianmacfarlane1241
      @ianmacfarlane1241 4 роки тому +18

      @@andrewtaylor940 No idea. It seems that with a small percentage of service personnel this kind of thing matters to them, whereas the vast majority would simply take pride in being part of the team who completed their objective.
      I'm reluctant to suggest that two exceptionally brave, supremely skilled, no doubt very intelligent men were acting in a juvenile manner, but it's difficult to see it any other way.
      Compare with Special Forces operators, military intelligence, resistance or partisan members, or members of elite units who carry out highly secretive operations without much recognition at all and the situation does look a bit sad.

    • @jamesday7344
      @jamesday7344 4 роки тому +9

      Everyone gets a trophy.... fitting

    • @divinedriftofficial
      @divinedriftofficial 4 роки тому +5

      Right? Why can't they all have full credit, the guys flying are just as or more important then the guys shooting.

  • @overcastfriday81
    @overcastfriday81 4 роки тому +42

    Fun fact: he was not heading out to "assess the damage" as you put it, but instead to instill confidence because soldiers were concerned about ground they had lost. How ironic, his purpose was to show that everything was still "okay".

  • @Nutzkie2001
    @Nutzkie2001 4 роки тому +320

    Admiral Ugaki's fate was ultimately determined. During the attack of April 15th, a D4Y was witnessed crashing onto a beach along the shore of Iheya-ushiro-jima Island, north of Okinawa. The following morning, the crash site was inspected by an American seamen named Daniel Rosewell, who noted the odd site of three bodies occupying what was clearly a two-seat aircraft. He also noted that one of the bodies wore an ornate samurai sword.
    That sword was later identified as belonging to Ugaki.

    • @aaronlopez3585
      @aaronlopez3585 3 роки тому +5

      Steve thank you for the information. I hope his family for closures sake learned about it also.

    • @Smile4theKillCam456
      @Smile4theKillCam456 2 роки тому

      sight*

    • @shivmalik9405
      @shivmalik9405 2 роки тому

      @@aaronlopez3585 it was a sword given to him by Yamamoto.

  • @tylerbrass4002
    @tylerbrass4002 3 роки тому +43

    Yamamoto was, in my opinion, an enemy of my country, but ultimately, an honorable warrior, and a skilled commander, who deserves respect in history. He was personally against the war with the US, and thought it folly, but he followed his orders.
    The same absolutely can not be said for many Japanese commanders and soldier during the war though, let me be clear, especially in China.

    • @ATFprdepartment
      @ATFprdepartment 2 роки тому +4

      He may have been a critical part of one of the most evil empires in history, but he deserves respect as a warrior because he served his duty honorably even though he had strong feelings against the war itself, knowing his country’s defeat was inevitable after the Battle of Midway

    • @northwestprof60
      @northwestprof60 Рік тому

      he was a damn war criminal, we just got to him first. This "following orders" cr ap didn't work for the Nazis and it doesn't wash here

    • @sid2112
      @sid2112 11 місяців тому

      Brilliance is brilliance. Rommel also comes to mind. A true pioneer of combat.

  • @madbomer72
    @madbomer72 4 роки тому +84

    “We sank three boats” “and then... then they released the POWER OF THE SUN... TWICE”

    • @ericscaillet2232
      @ericscaillet2232 4 роки тому +7

      It was the only way to bring peace quickly ,the Japanese would never have conceded otherwise.

    • @zanist100
      @zanist100 3 роки тому +1

      Technically fission isn't fusion... Hydrogen bombs weren't used on japan

    • @imperialguardsman8088
      @imperialguardsman8088 3 роки тому

      Russianbadger meme?

    • @fireboigotti2647
      @fireboigotti2647 3 роки тому +8

      Don't fuck with our boats

    • @lostmusic99
      @lostmusic99 3 роки тому +1

      @@zanist100 Let's hope they're never used anywhere

  • @tieck4408
    @tieck4408 4 роки тому +88

    >"I mean I guess I'll watch something on the Doolittle revenge raid. Not exactly the darkest topic..."
    I should know by now never to doubt Dark Docs.

    • @BrettonFerguson
      @BrettonFerguson 4 роки тому +3

      I've been commenting asking him to do a video on The Laconia Incident for awhile. That is a fairly dark incident. He probably hasn't seen any of my comments.

    • @MrMAC8964
      @MrMAC8964 4 роки тому +1

      @James Sloan and he could talk to the animals!

    • @penguinpurist1696
      @penguinpurist1696 3 роки тому +1

      I WAS JUST WACTHING THAT

  • @roykliffen9674
    @roykliffen9674 4 роки тому +104

    Yamamoto fought as an ensign in the Imperial Japanese Navy during the Battle of Tsushima in May 1905 where the Japanese fleet demolished the Russian 2nd Pacific squadron effectively ending the war between Japan and Russia in Japan''s favour.
    Yamamoto was wounded during this battle, losing two digits of one of his hands. Had he lost a third digit he would have been released from the IJN on a disability discharge and would never have become an admiral in the IJN.
    Remarkable how a single digit can make such a difference in history.

    • @jaybee9269
      @jaybee9269 4 роки тому +5

      I’d never heard that about Yamamoto it’s quite a remarkable “What if?”

    • @roykliffen9674
      @roykliffen9674 4 роки тому +4

      @@ammazzamoro Is it treason though? The Tsar's Russia wasn't exactly known for its good treatment of its Jewish minority. As far as I recall the leadership of the Bolshevist had many a Jewish member amongst them during the Revolution.

    • @roykliffen9674
      @roykliffen9674 4 роки тому +3

      @@ammazzamoro German and even French I could manage, but My Russian is basic enough that I wouldn't starve when in Russia but reading Solzhenitsyn is probably far beyond my capabilities. I tried Dostoevsky reading a bilingual English/Russian edition of "Crime and Punishment" but soon gave up on the Russian ^_^
      Vrolijk Pasen.

    • @whyuhatan
      @whyuhatan 4 роки тому +2

      @@ammazzamoro No book is illegal to read or own in the United States

    • @GeoCalifornian
      @GeoCalifornian 4 роки тому +5

      Roy Kliffen -later, Yamamoto would lose all of his digits.

  • @scenefromhere
    @scenefromhere 4 роки тому +353

    My girlfriend has threatened to launch an Operation Vengeance of her own if I keep watching your channel while she tries to get my attention. Yikes.

  • @anthonybatulis6516
    @anthonybatulis6516 4 роки тому +15

    P-38 is a cool plane. Whats amazing is that the timing in this mission never got messed up. What if there were high winds or if they flew too fast or too slow. So many things lined up perfectly.

  • @michaelashcraft8569
    @michaelashcraft8569 4 роки тому +16

    It has been stated that Yammoto was strict on keeping to a schedule which greatly contributed to our Pilot's success, thanks for the video !

  • @tonyennis3008
    @tonyennis3008 4 роки тому +79

    Churchill was furious that the US carried out the mission which could have given the japanese very strong evidence we had broken their codes. The US flew missions over the area for the next several days to make the first mission look like an unfortunately coincidence. Also, it was not a 400 mile flight - it was 600 miles out, and 400 miles back - 1000 miles in total.

    • @bobsagget823
      @bobsagget823 4 роки тому +2

      nobody cares

    • @davidhoward437
      @davidhoward437 4 роки тому +10

      But what's the use of breaking a code if you don't use it? There will only be so many Midways.

    • @tonyennis3008
      @tonyennis3008 4 роки тому +6

      @@davidhoward437 In the Atlantic, the allies made use of broken Enigma transmissions to make sure convoys avoided wolfpacks. In the Mediterranean, allies would send a recon aircraft to a location where a tanker bound for the Afrika Corps was known to be sailing, to not tip their hand to the Germans about our Enigma decrypts. For the Yamamoto shootdown, there isn't really a plausible reason why the P-38s showed up. If this caused the Japanese to change their cyphers then we'd be blind again.

    • @p51ace96
      @p51ace96 4 роки тому +1

      @@davidhoward437 To use it to avoid something huge. Sacrifice a ship or two today, so you can save a few aircraft carriers tomorrow.

    • @andrewtaylor940
      @andrewtaylor940 4 роки тому +4

      I think that the fury regarding actually using actionable intelligence has long been overstated. As others pointed out the Allies were routinely doing things that should give an equally revealing idea that the codes had been broken. I mean Midway? Coral Sea? The fact that American Carriers moved like Ghosts and were never where the Japanese expected them to be? By mid to late 1943 they had begun using intercepts to direct both Subs hunting Japanese Convoys and Merchant Shipping, and to direct US destroyers against Japanese Sub Patrols. Guadalcanal was actually the least likely place to tip off the Japanese about the code breaking as the Japanese knew the Americans had well hidden spotters throughout the Solomons reporting Japanese movements. It was also an incredibly arrogant and foolhardy mission by Yamamoto. Even if they did not suspect that their codes had been broken, a sane Command would have and should have realized that certain types of callsigns do display a pattern, even when encrypted. I mean the Japanese were doing this themselves. Even if they could not read the messages, after a while you start to figure out who they are to and from. You recognize the key assets such as the Admirals. It was sloppiness on the Japanese Command's part. They did this a number of times. The loss of Admiral Koga and the Z Plans reaching MacArthur are a good example.

  • @bigearl3867
    @bigearl3867 4 роки тому +14

    As a teen, I read a book called "Baa Baa Black Sheep" winch was supposed to be an account of Marine Corps Major "Pappy Boyington. In that book he claimed that it was an open secret that the Army Air Force was going after Yamamoto. Makes one wonder how much some of those old warriors stories were correct.

    • @jaybee9269
      @jaybee9269 4 роки тому +3

      Big Earl >> One of my favorite WW2 books was called “The American Aces Speak” unless I’m misremembering it. Great book; it even went into detail on being shot down, POW experiences & so on. One pilot was briefly in an extermination camp and spoke about it: “There were about 3,000 Gypsy kids and they killed all of them.” It gives you pause.

    • @apersonontheinternet8006
      @apersonontheinternet8006 4 роки тому +1

      Probably more than you might think. UFO's were probably the king of conspiracies for 60 years until the DoD casually dropped F/A-18 footage.

  • @robertdeen8741
    @robertdeen8741 4 роки тому +116

    "Let's not argue and bicker over who killed who, this is a time of rejoice and celebration"

    • @charlesmoore456
      @charlesmoore456 4 роки тому +1

      Look! The dead Prince!

    • @Bbknuckles
      @Bbknuckles 4 роки тому +3

      Robert Deen at the end of war all you have is credit.. not saying it’s a good thing. It’s just a thing the winners tend to hold on to.

    • @charlesmoore456
      @charlesmoore456 4 роки тому +1

      @@Bbknuckles He doesn't really want any of that. He'd rather just SING.

    • @robertdeen8741
      @robertdeen8741 4 роки тому +3

      I wasn't being all too serious. That line comes from Monty Python's Holy Grail.

    • @MIck-M
      @MIck-M 4 роки тому

      @@robertdeen8741 Nice one centurion, liked it... liked it :)

  • @PaulMcElligott
    @PaulMcElligott 4 роки тому +72

    “F4F Wildcats” - picture of F6F Hellcat (which was probably the right aircraft anyway by this point of the war).
    “Japanese Betty bombers” - picture of American B-24s, probably over Europe.
    “Escorted by A6M Zeroes” - picture of D3A “Val” dive bombers.
    “‘Kamikaze attacks” - British aircraft firing rockets.

    • @JP-st2mk
      @JP-st2mk 4 роки тому +6

      Yep. Saw all of that and thought WTF? Looks they just took any films of airplanes they could get and used them. It certainly ruined a good presentation.

    • @zackattack6371
      @zackattack6371 4 роки тому +1

      F4F were still used on American escort carriers

    • @jamessuter551
      @jamessuter551 4 роки тому +4

      Yes with all the film footage available they could've done a better job.

    • @apersonontheinternet8006
      @apersonontheinternet8006 4 роки тому +10

      @@jamessuter551 go cry a river somewhere else. This is a narration channel, not a cinematic recreation of events.

    • @contestant2964
      @contestant2964 4 роки тому +4

      How are you verified?

  • @mah6183
    @mah6183 4 роки тому +319

    It’s too bad that “credit” was a zero-sum game. Half? Full? Who cares. THEY got him. That’s what counts.

    • @smishdws
      @smishdws 4 роки тому +5

      And credit still is a zero-sum game. Having your name be more prominently written in the history books as having landed the killing blow is massive. I'm not even just talking about bragging rights. This is also generally good in terms of military recordkeeping and history to learn the most detailed account possible.

    • @terrybrown8539
      @terrybrown8539 4 роки тому +4

      @@smishdws
      Agree - facts matter. Its clear from the combat reports that Barber was the pilot that shot down the Betty carrying Yamamoto. Lanphier committed a serious breach of protocols by bragging (over the radio?) he'd got Yamamoto upon his return to base.

    • @SP-qo3pd
      @SP-qo3pd 4 роки тому +3

      How American of the pilots, trying to get more credit than deserved and selling their fellow pilots out for notoriety and a book deal. Today it's more prevalent, Chris Kyle especially comes to mind. No one should ever profit from their service.

    • @americafirst7785
      @americafirst7785 4 роки тому +2

      Funny how two of the kill planes were not able to go witch left only two humm

    • @robertandrews6915
      @robertandrews6915 4 роки тому +2

      It’s important to the brass that credit is given to THEIR division so the have bragging rights and can earn a promotion. You see the same thing in Europe between American generals and British generals, I’m sure you know who I’m referring to, each country wanted to have been the first to do something

  • @Big_E_Soul_Fragment
    @Big_E_Soul_Fragment 4 роки тому +289

    Japan: *Sinks ships*
    US: NO. U. *Drops the sun twice*

    • @robin961000
      @robin961000 4 роки тому +7

      😂😂

    • @phillipgrubb2443
      @phillipgrubb2443 4 роки тому +64

      @Carey Hunt lol they did not offer to surrender until after. The us offered peace before they dropped it. Japan retorted by saying the campaign to take Japan would be the longest and bloodiest battle in us history. It began arming civilians and training children to fight. They didnt even offer to surrender after the first bomb. They thought the us only had one. It was almost immediately after the second one when they finally did after realizing the us was just going to keep dropping nukes on them until they did.

    • @ronfullerton3162
      @ronfullerton3162 4 роки тому +22

      @Carey Hunt Your Mommy and Daddy never washed your mouth out with soap for lying, did they.

    • @ronfullerton3162
      @ronfullerton3162 4 роки тому +4

      @@phillipgrubb2443 I just wish more people got to spend the evening with two vets as I did. They had been buddies all their lives, and we're together in the first wave of the occupation force. They were terribly ready for us to invade. The second bomb was the game changer.

    • @kokofan50
      @kokofan50 4 роки тому +11

      @@phillipgrubb2443 Japan offered to surrender, but on the condition that they got to keep most of the territory they took along with a couple other thing. Those were unacceptable for obvious reasons.

  • @SAMPLETEXT285
    @SAMPLETEXT285 4 роки тому +5

    quarantined at home and my school closed for the rest of the year... But that doesn't mean i cant continue to learn new things ive been binge watching this channel for a few hours now

  • @yvanthedrakon
    @yvanthedrakon 4 роки тому +141

    So he was basically a General Robert E Lee kind of person: opposed to the war he fought in, but loyal to his people and nation to the point where he would fight for them and did his best

    • @jaredchinchello1760
      @jaredchinchello1760 4 роки тому +7

      @@ammazzamoro I didn't know that he was a Catholic, looks like you learn something new everyday.

    • @berrytharp1334
      @berrytharp1334 4 роки тому +1

      It was probably against American best interest to kill him ultimately, he was terrible tactically. He does not even earn a mention with Lee in that regard.
      Hindsight being 20/20.

    • @douglasdaniel4504
      @douglasdaniel4504 4 роки тому +5

      @@ammazzamoro Isoroku Yamamoto was not Catholic; apparently there is some confusion with an older admiral also named Yamamoto who was.

    • @ericpelote998
      @ericpelote998 4 роки тому +1

      @@berrytharp1334 he was a brilliant tactician , the fact that America broke the Japanese Naval code was the 🇺🇸 saving Grace and the Japanese dedication to sticking to a plan wit no option

    • @theenquiringone7353
      @theenquiringone7353 4 роки тому +5

      @@berrytharp1334 I'm just curious ...... how did you conclude that Yamamoto was a bad tactician? He ran wild (just as he had said that he would) until the Battle of Midway in June of '42. The loss there was a strategic one (tactical commander was Admiral Nagumo, of Pearl Harbor infamy), in that it prevented the completion of Japan's planned zone of defense - and had been facilitated by the compromised JN-25 code. Yamamoto's tactical plan for the attack on Midway (and its ancillary ambushing of any American rescue fleet) was quite good. Four fewer carriers later, though, things looked just a tad differently, to be sure. Oopsy ............... :-)

  • @daveb.4268
    @daveb.4268 4 роки тому +49

    Rex T. Barber was flying a barrowed mount on this mission the "Miss Virginia". His plane "Diablo" was being repaired as he sheared 4' off the left wing when he straiffed a Japanese destroyer and clipped the super-stucture of the ship, close one.
    My family personally knew Rex in Redmond, OR and as I don't believe that I ever personally met him (too young), heard he was a super nice guy with lots of great stories. 🙂

    • @dr.ofdubiouswisdom4189
      @dr.ofdubiouswisdom4189 4 роки тому +2

      Ah... a Barber that did indeed - enjoy 'close shaves'. I always enjoy hearing the first hand accounts from servicemen - you seem to get an honest assessment of what could've gone wrong or what they were thinking at the time. Thanks for sharing.

  • @donkeyslayer4661
    @donkeyslayer4661 3 роки тому +7

    The Air Force wasn't formed till 1947, so the Lightnings couldn't be part of the Air Force as you stated. They were assigned to the Army Air Corps.

  • @cassiecraft9555
    @cassiecraft9555 3 роки тому +2

    I saw a documentary on the History Channel that said, by killing Yamamoto we shortened the Pacific War by at least 3 years. Because he was such a brilliant and strategic war planner. Thank you.

    • @Rob774
      @Rob774 7 місяців тому

      I don't know about that. They were losing.the battle of attrition, thus its pretty hard to plot and scheme around that.

  • @MGood-ij1hi
    @MGood-ij1hi 4 роки тому +273

    Yamamoto got off easy with a "warrior's death", had he survived the war the Americans would have executed him by hanging, just as they did to Tojo.

    • @nickgonzaga1178
      @nickgonzaga1178 4 роки тому +3

      @KV-85 контрмера snake attack traitor means

    • @christianpaullegaspi5641
      @christianpaullegaspi5641 4 роки тому +33

      He is against waging war against the United States but his superior ordered him and he obeyed as a soldier

    • @MGood-ij1hi
      @MGood-ij1hi 4 роки тому +9

      @@christianpaullegaspi5641 Tell that to the families of the men entombed in the battleship Arizona at Pearl Harbor..

    • @Wildstar40
      @Wildstar40 4 роки тому +4

      Yamamoto would have gutted himself before the Americans got him.

    • @guysmalley
      @guysmalley 4 роки тому +1

      Richard the lion heart we also watched the vid thank you🥱

  • @michaelhowell2326
    @michaelhowell2326 4 роки тому +6

    Oh man, this is one of the best videos you have put out yet. Outstanding!

  • @thewakeup5459
    @thewakeup5459 4 роки тому +4

    7:53 I love it when the rotation of propellers are synced with the frame rate of a camera (or the engine could be off)

    • @EstorilEm
      @EstorilEm 4 роки тому

      It was shut off - based on the maneuvers and filming, it was likely during single-engine tests to determine (or demonstrate) flight characteristics with an engine out.

  • @44hawk28
    @44hawk28 3 роки тому +1

    I happen to be uniquely familiar with this operation. A close friend of mine's father was one of the pilots of this Squadron of P38. And the flight would not have been possible at all without the input of Charles Lindbergh who show the Army Air corps how to get over twice the range with the P-38 by running the engines much leaner when they were merely traveling. Lindbergh had flown with that group for a while and even had shot down a couple of Japanese aircraft with it. When he noticed that the planes were running out of fuel at a fairly High rate he developed procedure for more than doubling the mission capability of the aircraft. Even flu the aircraft for almost 1,900 miles and landed it back at the base and mechanics took the engines apart because they were sure that running that engine that lane would damage the Pistons. There was no damage to the engines whatsoever.
    All of the ciphers were broken by 1940. For all intensive purposes.

    • @stanhathcoat920
      @stanhathcoat920 3 роки тому

      True. Lindbergh's advice also helped extend the range of the P47 Thunderbolts in the area.

  • @NealB123
    @NealB123 4 роки тому +6

    Thank God Yamamoto was a stickler for punctuality and his flight appeared at the intercept location at exactly the expected time. The P-38's only had enough fuel to remain on station for a few minutes. A slacker like me would have been at least 30 minutes late and missed the entire show.

  • @professorswaggamuffin7572
    @professorswaggamuffin7572 4 роки тому +35

    We caught you slippin dark docs! Peal harbor? Lol

  • @thorshammer7883
    @thorshammer7883 4 роки тому +100

    Can you do a video on Operation Highjump in 1946 and the USS Liberty incident of 1967 please one day?

    • @lVladness
      @lVladness 4 роки тому +9

      Thor's Hammer we cant add the bad rep for Israel ...
      shhhhhh

    • @Nicoland87
      @Nicoland87 4 роки тому +1

      XD

    • @SOS-School_Of_Survival
      @SOS-School_Of_Survival 4 роки тому +10

      I bet the USS liberty will never ever be covered.

    • @charlylucky2037
      @charlylucky2037 4 роки тому +2

      @@SOS-School_Of_Survival , there is a good documentary here on utube about that incident. At least there was about 2 years ago, last time I seen it.

    • @CaesarInVa
      @CaesarInVa 4 роки тому

      My dad was one of the aviators who participated in Operation Highjump.

  • @skelejp9982
    @skelejp9982 4 роки тому +6

    Hello all, nice Movie to see this Operation is : The Gallant Hours !
    In this Movie Halsey flies to Midway in a Huge Seaplane, but during flight receives information 18 Zero's where spotted heading to Midway, (because Yamamoto figured out there was a Big Plane travelling somewhere around Midway with some higher US Navy Commanders..)
    So Halsey decided not to go to Midway, but Guam...if I am correct.
    The end reminds me of Gaming WW2 Dogfight's, When Your KIll got stolen !
    Thank You Dark Docs , for these Interesting Docu's !

  • @Alurpal80
    @Alurpal80 4 роки тому +3

    I love dark docs and now I cant wait to start watching dark skies

  • @warrenlehmkuhleii8472
    @warrenlehmkuhleii8472 4 роки тому +22

    Japanese officer: You know it seems weird that they just happened on our top admiral, were our codes cracked?
    Other Japanese officer: Nah, I mean the American press said they just happened upon us. I mean sure the US military was the one who told the events. But we have not evidence.
    (3-6 business days later)
    Letter from American intel officer to other Japanese officer: Hey thanks for not questions if your codes were cracked.

  • @sonictheedgehog5360
    @sonictheedgehog5360 4 роки тому +4

    Thanks dark docs for taking up that mantle History Channel have up.

  • @jaybee9269
    @jaybee9269 4 роки тому +95

    “Transport and exports”; escorts? And about at 8:55; the Admiral was inspecting the Solomons, not Guadalcanal. I think the P-38’s flew from the latter island.
    Another little error was showing footage of Grumman F6F Hellcats while speaking of their predecessor aircraft, the F4F Wildcat. Also it was the “Army Air Force” until the USAF was established in 1947.
    Frankly there is too much footage of aircraft unrelated to the subject. Maybe you could have had Dr. Felton from Mark Felton Productions look over this one before posting it? Pretty sure he’s a fan!

    • @jackattackmt
      @jackattackmt 4 роки тому +2

      One word: Wow

    • @davidkyle5017
      @davidkyle5017 4 роки тому +9

      As noted above, please take care when showing and naming aircraft, the mistakes are annoying and misrepresent history. There was a shot of a British crew boarding a Wellington bomber shown 3 times, none of which made any sense. Nitpicking aside, it was a nice production. Well done.

    • @jaybee9269
      @jaybee9269 4 роки тому +3

      David Kyle >> It was indeed a nice production and a great channel. Now I feel a little bad; usually I find something to praise when I leave comments too...

    • @davidkyle5017
      @davidkyle5017 4 роки тому +7

      @@jaybee9269 Don't feel bad, your comments were warranted, if someone does a history presentation, they should get their the facts straight. :)

    • @TheJayson07
      @TheJayson07 4 роки тому +2

      Hey cmon it’s kinda hard to compel footage from 80 years ago.. I thought he did a pretty well overall job

  • @jean-huguesbouchard1045
    @jean-huguesbouchard1045 4 роки тому +29

    5:15 "furthermore the lightning lack an awacs radar aircraft" This is irrelevant since awacs was introduced in 1977 well after WW2

    • @p51ace96
      @p51ace96 4 роки тому +1

      Exactly why I came to the comments. AWACs? Really?

    • @devinthierault
      @devinthierault 4 роки тому

      AWACS was hardly necessary as it was all about gunfights anyway. Ships and land based radar were more than enough. For bombers they eve used to use two beams of radar from England to triangulate to the target.

    • @EricDKaufman
      @EricDKaufman 3 роки тому

      yeah.... this channel makes routine mistakes per epsiode. I watch because I think it is fun to laugh at their ignorance,

    • @johnp139
      @johnp139 3 роки тому

      They also lacked satellite mapping.

    • @franz289
      @franz289 3 роки тому

      Caught that too. However, if they had AWACs then, that would have been a big advantage throughout the war.

  • @rbf100
    @rbf100 4 роки тому +1

    The incredible navigation skill of the P38 pilots to be able to intercept Yamamoto's plane. And the engineering behind the P38 was something else.

    • @devinthierault
      @devinthierault 4 роки тому

      Almost as if the divine wind itself felt betrayed by the pearl harbor attack. Or just luck.

  • @ruairigoat
    @ruairigoat 4 роки тому +5

    Good to see another channel. Being here since Dark 5. Great content that always makes me think how different things are now. Cheers

  • @slonkydonky1403
    @slonkydonky1403 4 роки тому +1

    YES my day cannot get better but no man with the best voice proves me wrong

  • @Don113
    @Don113 4 роки тому +9

    A correction: Yamamoto did *not* actually have an accurate read of America. He and Naval GHQ, while well aware of America's overwhelming economic advantage, assumed that a quick, devastating strike on Pearl Harbor would be enough to knock the US out of the war. Instead it fired up the American populace and gave FDR a solid, unassailable reason for the US to enter the war on the Allied side.
    Kido Butai also failed to destroy the American carriers (although they would have also likely been destroyed), meaning that, while the US Pacific fleet had been dealt a tremendous blow, they were by no means out of the fight. USS Yorktown and USS Lexington would go on to surprise the Japanese at Coral Sea as they attempted to invade Port Moresby (Operation MO). Though Lexington was sunk, Operation MO failed and Yamamoto became obsessed with destroying the American fleet carriers, while also assuming (for some reason) that the Americans were reluctant to fight, even though they had just went on the attack at Coral Sea.
    So when he planned for Midway, he did so with this flawed assumption in mind; he created a detailed plan that involved drawing out the supposedly cowardly US Navy out of Pearl Harbor, while never once considering the possibility that Chester Nimitz might have actually been seeking the IJN out. Of course, we all know what happened there: four of the best carriers in the IJN ended up decorating the ocean floor.
    So, if the assassination of Yamamoto failed, or was called off, it would have been highly unlikely for Imperial Japan to turn the war back in their favor. In 1943 the US economy was in full war-mode; they were producing Essex-Class fleet carriers every other month, something that Imperial Japan could not in their wildest dreams hope to match. I'm not even mentioning the escort carriers, destroyers, and destroyer escorts that were produced in eye-watering amounts. By 1944, the US Pacific Fleet was essentially brand new, heavily armed, well-trained and well-equipped. Nothing Yamamoto could have done would have stopped this force from dismantling the IJN.

  • @FrankRoosevelt32
    @FrankRoosevelt32 4 роки тому

    Thank you for a historical video of a reasonable length. There are so many videos on historical topics that I would like to know the basics of but don't care for an hour long dive into. Love videos like this where I can scratch the surface and dig for more if I want it.

  • @kencoston3858
    @kencoston3858 4 роки тому +6

    The mentioned P-38 fighters , were not Air Force aircraft, as the USAF did not exist at that time. The aircraft and their pilots were, in fact, members of the US Army Air Corps. THE USAF was founded in 1947, 2 years after the end of the war.

  • @levijones1874
    @levijones1874 4 роки тому +1

    Glad i havent seen this yet. Been needed something good to watch.

  • @RedcoatsReturn
    @RedcoatsReturn 4 роки тому +10

    The P38 Lightening, what a plane and what brave young crews flew them! Superb code breaking intelligence also 👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏🇺🇸🇺🇸 I respected as a gifted adversary Yamamoto but .....he was the enemy and....the bastard had to die. Good job too!

    • @korbell1089
      @korbell1089 4 роки тому

      I love the P38 but have you ever heard what the pilot had to do to bail out of one? unlike a regular aircraft that the pilot just jumped out of, a P38 pilot had to pop his canopy then crawl out onto the wing before letting go or risk being cut in half on the center tail flat.

    • @user-bz5ys1eo2z
      @user-bz5ys1eo2z 10 місяців тому

      ❤❤❤ ISAIAH66 PSALMS 82. From Philippines me grandfather my name Doretha malatin wal moto sana kng sinong mangbabatas sa America hingi ako ng tulong dito sa pilipinas walang umaaciton. Pls help me God more powers. Maraming salamat full address sitio Datal-anao Barangay Amsipit Maasim Sarangani Province. Tanks

  • @MarkH10
    @MarkH10 3 роки тому

    DOCS
    I am a history buff from childhood, and while overseas, I read every book in the Child's section, then the Adult Section on WWs I and II.
    Thus qualified, I recall from the mid 70's, (when my gf was Gen. Doolittles' great niece, and yes he visited them once a year), that the actual pilot who shot down Yamamotos' aircraft stated on a TV interview that he and his wingman saw a Bomber break away, and try to run, and as they were still our of range, he pulled the trigger to "clear" or "test" the guns, and make sure he could shoot, or to reassign the shot to his wingman, and unexpectedly, while 'out of range' the bomber burst into smoke, and displayed fire, and went into the canopy.
    I can only recall the man was 50ish, dressed in a blazer with a tie, and a little overweight. Maybe more like 230s. But my point is that there is an interview out there in the TV world somewhere with the single pilot who claimed he hit the shot to down Yamamoto made at about 30 years after the event.

  • @BBBILLY86
    @BBBILLY86 4 роки тому +18

    Too much inclusion of 50 caliber waist gunner clips. P38'S have a nose full of forward facing Machine guns fired by the pilot like a fighter. Technically I think they are a fighter/bomber class plane. But have no fuselage full of crew shooting machine guns.

    • @borisspringsteen1987
      @borisspringsteen1987 4 роки тому +5

      Not to mention shots of Beaufighters and Wellingtons and B-24s, etc. Good footage but irrelevant.

    • @jaybee9269
      @jaybee9269 4 роки тому +2

      I would have liked more P-38 footage too. Beautiful airplane, curvaceous & Art Deco like the YB-17.

  • @kellyflynnmcmanus8222
    @kellyflynnmcmanus8222 4 роки тому +1

    You always do a fantastic job.
    Keep up the good work.

  • @garymcaleer6112
    @garymcaleer6112 4 роки тому +6

    Some great military men such as Robert E. Lee, Yamamoto and others warned of the danger of entering conflicts and counseled against going to war. But when they made their decision to go along with the warmongers they shared the guilt for the atrocities that followed.

    • @cgustafson240
      @cgustafson240 4 роки тому +1

      While I completely understand your point. War is a dirty and complicated business. And no nation that has ever engaged in it has hands that are completely clean. Patriots follow the actions of their Nation. And in the end, history is written by the victors.

    • @thunderbird7020
      @thunderbird7020 4 роки тому +2

      The Infidel Truman had little choice but to use the atomic bombs unless you would prefer the Japanese fight to the end and go extinct in an invasion (as well as millions of allied soldiers dying).
      And the reason the bomb wasn’t used on Germany was because the bombs weren’t ready until Germany was already defeated (it was finished in July and Germany surrendered in May).
      Truman was a good man and president. And his decision saved a countless amount of lives including my Great Uncles. Not to mention he stopped MacArthur from using the bombs on China in the Korean War so he clearly wasn’t a warmongering monster.

    • @garymcaleer6112
      @garymcaleer6112 4 роки тому

      @The Infidel GOD is judge (John 12:48). We did not start those wars. And the brutal aggression of the instigators deserved the response they received. All you have to do is look at Newton's law of physics: "For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction."
      He drew his science from Paul's words: "Whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he also reap." Galatians 6:7. The physical and moral laws are kindred.

    • @garymcaleer6112
      @garymcaleer6112 4 роки тому

      @@cgustafson240 Agreed. Adrenaline combined with our base passions is not a good combo, bro. But we see a few who have remained steady, like Desmond Doss.

  • @fordson51
    @fordson51 3 роки тому

    I read the book Killing Yamamoto that was published in the 80s. This doc mirrors the info in the book, minus the controversy about the kill. Great doc. Keep up the good work.

  • @Jay-ln1co
    @Jay-ln1co 4 роки тому +7

    "That still only counts as one!"

  • @Retiredmco
    @Retiredmco 4 роки тому +1

    Excellent documentary!!! I didn't know this!

  • @joeyjamison5772
    @joeyjamison5772 4 роки тому +17

    It was actually cold on the morning of the attack.
    When the P-38s arrived, there was a Nip in the air!

  • @justsomemincedgarlic
    @justsomemincedgarlic 3 роки тому

    Wow this is great. My grandfather told me a lot about the conflict with japan, he was a fairly high ranking Canadian naval officer in WW2 before he moved to the United States in the early 70’s, but i obviously never heard about anything like this. Not even in school.

  • @BELCAN57
    @BELCAN57 3 роки тому +3

    It wasn't "who" got Bamako to.
    It was a TEAM effort, all the way to the guys that got the planes ready to go.

  • @barrybrevik9178
    @barrybrevik9178 4 роки тому +2

    Great topic! Impressed I am.

  • @mashbury
    @mashbury 3 роки тому +6

    So... what role DID RAF Wellington,s play in the death of Yamamoto ?
    I do wish your film editor would know what the hell they are do as a project this week

  • @melissasueh.
    @melissasueh. 4 роки тому +1

    The P-38's also attacked ground targets after shooting down the Bettys. They were instructed to do so in order to avoid having the Japanese suspect that they had known that Yamamoto was flying in. Command wanted it to look as if they had encountered the Admiral's flight by chance on a regular raid against New Britain to prevent the enemy from realizing that the Allies were reading Japanese codes.

  • @jonasburns7026
    @jonasburns7026 4 роки тому +3

    Awesome video. If i may a have a suggestion for a new video. Its actually two one on project Philadelphia and two an in depth look/analysis at nikola tesla and his inventions and work with the government. It may be possible to tie them together since Tesla was involved in Philadelphia.

    • @ianmacfarlane1241
      @ianmacfarlane1241 4 роки тому +1

      A yarn that originated from one single, solitary source with no secondary confirmation.

  • @brunotulliani
    @brunotulliani 4 роки тому

    Fantastic content.......nothing is more satisfying than vengeance and retribution!

  • @billace90
    @billace90 4 роки тому +27

    Like the old saying goes:
    “He had it coming”.......

  • @matmichaels441
    @matmichaels441 4 роки тому +2

    Keeping the same vids up is good well done DD

  • @dovidell
    @dovidell 4 роки тому +10

    nice mixture of allied aircraft NOT used for Operation Vengeance , including a Vickers Wellington , and a Bristol Beaufighter !!!

    • @fanfair1813
      @fanfair1813 4 роки тому

      And not just once. That shot of the crew heading towards the Wellington was shown at least three times. More like, Operation Any Old Aircraft Will Do For This Doco

    • @markrussell4449
      @markrussell4449 4 роки тому +1

      B24 over Europe (Ploesti raid?) Is a bit strange as well

    • @davidvasquez08
      @davidvasquez08 4 роки тому

      Lack of footage, most of which was rather blurred or near impossible to understand

  • @charlylucky2037
    @charlylucky2037 4 роки тому +2

    Very good story. I never knew this. Thank you for the history lesson. Also subbed immediately to your new channel. Looking forward to seeing what comes up. 👍

  • @skiprussell2606
    @skiprussell2606 4 роки тому +8

    Yamamoto was a great Admiral. He never wanted to attack the U.S. he knew the outcome would be a disaster for Japan.

    • @robertgabuna355
      @robertgabuna355 4 роки тому

      I concur...

    • @mikhail2709
      @mikhail2709 4 роки тому

      This dude legit was pure evil. He hated Americans.

    • @scottmurphy650
      @scottmurphy650 Рік тому

      @@mikhail2709 Nonsense, he actually had a lot of admiration for Americans and he knew that once awakened, the "Sleeping Giant" would stomp them into goo.

  • @MNDashcam
    @MNDashcam 3 роки тому +1

    It would be interesting to see how these wars are taught in schools over in Japan, Germany, Belgium, etc..

  • @_gungrave_6802
    @_gungrave_6802 4 роки тому +10

    Did anyone else hear clapping when the pictures of the Japanese officers were shown at 8:39? am I hearing things?

    • @josmo1363
      @josmo1363 4 роки тому +5

      Nah, DD was just changing slides 😉

  • @nevasoba5953
    @nevasoba5953 4 роки тому

    Always so good .love the topics, the historical data, the narration . It's all really well done.

  • @naiseniichan8035
    @naiseniichan8035 4 роки тому +3

    3:24
    "unknown to them, the Military Intelligence Service have been able to intercept their communications for years"
    yeahhhh...

    • @theenquiringone7353
      @theenquiringone7353 4 роки тому

      Are you being skeptical with your "yeahhh", or being a cheerleader (punctuation helps, in comprehending these things).
      Joe Rochfort and the intel boys did their own sort of magic with that Japanese JN-25 "Magic" code for a few years prior to April of '43.

  • @t.macrocosm1831
    @t.macrocosm1831 Рік тому +1

    It is now commonly believed that it was Rex Barber who shot down Yamamoto’s Betty, but Yamamoto was hit by a 50cal. bullet in his shoulder & died before his plane crashed in jungle. So anyone, including Lanphire, who shot at Betties could have killed him

    • @anti-communist103
      @anti-communist103 Рік тому

      Barber's testimony is the one that matches up most with visual evidence.

  • @FrequencyOfThought
    @FrequencyOfThought 4 роки тому +28

    in 15 years- The secret mission for Corona Virus Revenge

    • @Waringpro_Ci
      @Waringpro_Ci 4 роки тому

      The fire bombing of Beijing then...

    • @tieck4408
      @tieck4408 4 роки тому +1

      "How do we kill the Americans?"
      "We are smallpox vaccinated, they are not. We have smallpox."
      "Imagine a flu-like corona virus that will endanger us equally or more, something that seems by all accounts to have jumped from animal to human as is common."
      "Sir, the fatality rate of smallpox..."
      "Warfare should look like stupid accident, Song Too."
      "Sun Tzu did not say that, Sir."

    • @peekaboopeekaboo1165
      @peekaboopeekaboo1165 4 роки тому

      Already planned by US, UK & Israel. As with this present day Germ warfare, frame up & coverup against China.

  • @coachb2766
    @coachb2766 3 роки тому

    Excellent rendition. Great history lesson.

  • @andrewtaylor940
    @andrewtaylor940 4 роки тому +4

    I may be wrong on this, but I thought 2 of the P-38's used were an unarmed Radar equipped variant?

    • @LogieT2K
      @LogieT2K 4 роки тому +1

      Andrew Taylor i was thinking the same thing actually

    • @EstorilEm
      @EstorilEm 4 роки тому +2

      I don’t think so - but there’s very little mentioning the actual support forces (as well as the protective force of zeros) - also that was a Val dive bomber shown. And what was up with all the B-17 footage lol.

    • @mikej9470
      @mikej9470 4 роки тому +2

      @@EstorilEm Might as well show some of Audie Murphy on the burning Sherman tank and some paratroopers jumping out of a plane to add to the unrelated montage of footage used in this video.

  • @forrestgould5811
    @forrestgould5811 3 роки тому +1

    Rex Barber was eventually given full credit for shooting down Yamamoto when the US military examined the wreckage and found it was shot down from the rear which only Barber had fired from the rear.

  • @chrissinclair4442
    @chrissinclair4442 4 роки тому +26

    A loser captain that takes credit from those under him. Say it ain't so?

  • @jlastre
    @jlastre 3 роки тому

    When I was a child my next door neighbor was Niesi. He served with Naval Intelligence in WWII. One of the bravest men I knew.

  • @jeremyhannaford1306
    @jeremyhannaford1306 4 роки тому +3

    Kamikaze attack- when did the Japanese used RAF Beaufighters?

  • @bussnr1
    @bussnr1 3 роки тому

    I love your videos. I refuse to pay UA-cam for your services without commercials. Where can i see this outside of UA-cam? I can pay!

  • @reubenjackson7829
    @reubenjackson7829 4 роки тому +7

    They did have a warning about pearl harbour but they ignored it

  • @MyBoomStick1
    @MyBoomStick1 3 роки тому +1

    This was extremely interesting

  • @buckbuchanan5849
    @buckbuchanan5849 4 роки тому +4

    Why the interspersed aircraft in the video that had nothing to do with this mission?!

  • @matthewjay660
    @matthewjay660 4 роки тому +1

    This should be made into a movie 🎥.

  • @garykubodera9528
    @garykubodera9528 4 роки тому +3

    I could be wrong, but if I remember right, this was the 1st time the US military was ordered and used to assassinate a high ranking government official or officer of another country while at war as most were protected by the Geneva conventions... Our country's official policy is to follow those agreements. Espically during any conflicts... Just a thought to consider...

    • @Vonstab
      @Vonstab 4 роки тому +1

      Yamamoto was an officer in an armed force activly actively engaged in war, as such he was a combatant and had zero special or protected status as the Geneva conventions in force at the time only applied to military personnel when wounded, sick or prisoners of war. The more extensive protections provided by the 4th Geneva convention and its protocols were only in place from 1949 with the protocols being added even later.
      No to mention that he was travelling on a armed military aircraft, all of which are lawful targets in war.

  • @chrisiwasa1392
    @chrisiwasa1392 4 роки тому +1

    Did you know that the intercepted message was translated by Sgt. Harold Fudenna, a Japanese-American Nisei in the MIS. Their work was top secret and they could not talk about it after the war.

  • @vizionz9755
    @vizionz9755 3 роки тому +3

    It's a pity that Yamamoto was so devoted to his country, he was truly one of the world's greatest strategical commanders

    • @TheNuckinFoob
      @TheNuckinFoob 2 роки тому

      Nothing wrong with his devotion to his country. The devotion is likely the biggest reason he was so good at what he did. Enemy or not, highly skilled soldiers, pilots and sailors are respected across the board for their genius.
      Nimitz, Halsey, Spruance, Fletcher, Patton, Bradley, MacArthur, Churchill, Rommel, Goring, Richtofen, Yamamoto, Nagumo, Toyoda... These are just a handful but the actual list is VERY long and every single one of them was highly, highly respected by their opponent.

  • @philkahotea1973
    @philkahotea1973 4 роки тому +1

    Yamamoto was shot down in the jungle in Buin bottom of Bougainville. Locals took us to the crash site in 2016.

  • @johngeverett
    @johngeverett 4 роки тому +15

    @7:19 why in the name of sanity are you showing footage of B-24 Liberators while narrating a mission comprised entirely if P-38 Lightnings?

    • @c39v26
      @c39v26 3 роки тому +2

      You are right ,that footage was over the ploesty oil fields,you see too much of those inaccuracies in these documents

    • @sabawstudios7780
      @sabawstudios7780 3 роки тому

      This is something you should expect when only one person does the research, writing, editing, voice over, directing, and production. It's not as easy as it looks. Trust me. I do the exact same thing.

  • @roberthill3207
    @roberthill3207 4 роки тому +3

    Have a good day everyone.

  • @Gunners_Mate_Guns
    @Gunners_Mate_Guns 4 роки тому +3

    Too bad Lanfier broke protocol and apparently had an ego about the mission.
    Both men would have rightly been awarded the Medal of Honor but for that.

    • @puremaga17
      @puremaga17 4 роки тому

      Many War 2 vets believe "The Medal" should only be awarded posthumously..

  • @markmaki4460
    @markmaki4460 4 роки тому

    I had no idea how much the Betty looked like the Liberator - fascinating.

  • @mikej9470
    @mikej9470 4 роки тому +3

    Might as well throw some tanks shooting to add to this montage of unrelated footage.

  • @michaelkaminski8339
    @michaelkaminski8339 3 роки тому +2

    You make it sound like the USA and FDR are like the Five Families and Don Brazini out to get Sonny Corleone after he starts the war when Don Corleone gets hit outside Genco Olive Oil Importing Company in Little Italy "I'm gonna get you Don Yamamoto! if it's the last thing I do, you'll be sleeping with the fishes!"

  • @BA-gn3qb
    @BA-gn3qb 4 роки тому +4

    It's disgusting the way people feel only a Medal of Honor is worthy for them.
    Real Medal of Honor recipients never made it back or wear it in honor of those that have fallen.

    • @Matt_P
      @Matt_P 4 роки тому

      I don't understand where you got that from the video.... I understood it as they were upset over having credit for the kill, not that they didnt get the Medal of Honor

    • @BA-gn3qb
      @BA-gn3qb 4 роки тому

      @@Matt_P - Obviously, you missed minute 11:00 when it says a pilot received the Navy Cross, instead of the more prized Medal of Honor.

    • @Matt_P
      @Matt_P 4 роки тому

      @@BA-gn3qb Yes the Medal of Honor is more "prized" than a Navy Cross.... that is kinda how precedence of awards go.... Please inform me where MAJ Mitchell was expecting and disappointed that he didn't get it. (Spoiler, he wasn't).

    • @BA-gn3qb
      @BA-gn3qb 4 роки тому

      @@Matt_P - Please inform me where I mentioned anyone by name in either of my posts.
      You should get a job at CNN. You like to make up fake stuff.

    • @Matt_P
      @Matt_P 4 роки тому

      @@BA-gn3qb
      1. "Obviously, you missed minute 11:00 when it says a pilot received the Navy Cross, instead of the more prized Medal of Honor."
      2. Again, that is kinda how precedence of awards go.

  • @misarse
    @misarse 3 роки тому

    Best detail I have seen yet on the subject. Great job. I hit this subscribe button on your channel.

  • @gregniel
    @gregniel 4 роки тому +20

    "I shot him down!". . . . . "No I did!" . . . bunch of babies.

    • @jaybee9269
      @jaybee9269 4 роки тому +1

      G. Elliott Nielsen >> It is a tiresome argument, to be sure.

    • @MANJYOMETHUNDER111
      @MANJYOMETHUNDER111 4 роки тому +1

      The biggest baby is the US. Declaring War, I can understand, but executing a raid for petty revenge?

    • @LoneWolf051
      @LoneWolf051 4 роки тому

      @@MANJYOMETHUNDER111 makes perfect sense to me, morale is everything in war

    • @natebox4550
      @natebox4550 2 роки тому

      @@MANJYOMETHUNDER111 plus killing a high ranking admiral isn’t just revenge, it’s smart.

  • @adamantium1983
    @adamantium1983 4 роки тому

    This attack needs to be made into a movie.

  • @guesstime6445
    @guesstime6445 4 роки тому +3

    I swear to god, but I remember “Pearl Harbour” not “Peal Harbour”

    • @guesstime6445
      @guesstime6445 4 роки тому

      Carey Hunt Me

    • @TOMAS-lh4er
      @TOMAS-lh4er 4 роки тому

      GET A LIFE ,if all you do is correct !

    • @guesstime6445
      @guesstime6445 4 роки тому

      Carey Hunt you asked if I ever seen anyone make spelling mistakes. That was my answer

    • @guesstime6445
      @guesstime6445 4 роки тому

      TOMAS definition of “Get a life” start living a fuller or more interesting existence. I can’t get a life during the Coronavirus until the pandemic is over

  • @andrewtaylor940
    @andrewtaylor940 4 роки тому +2

    One other fun addendum to this, was the secret off the books contribution of one of Americas greatest flying heroes. Charles Lindberg. Lindberg was a staunch Isolationist for the US. He was firmly against the US getting involved in overseas wars. He had even resigned his military commission in protest. Leaving him in a touchy spot with Roosevelt, who was unwilling to restore it once actual fighting began. Still Lindberg wanted to do what he could, largely as a consultant. Often sneaking in to provide help before the top brass found out and had him sent back to the states. Early in their deployment he got to spend quite a lot of time with this P-38 squadron. What he saw was a plain that was not being flown properly for its capabilities. In a few short weeks he taught the crews how to get the most out of the twin engine pursuit plane by effectively doubling its range. He showed them some easy tricks with the engines to cruise along using minimal fuel over long stretches of ocean. Using Lindberg's tricks the pilots could stretch their fuel consumption such that they went from 1200 mile range to 2500. And thus they became the ideal aircraft with the range to intercept Yamamoto. The Japanese never expected the US to be able to project interceptors out that far from one of their bases.

  • @usoppfangirl8153
    @usoppfangirl8153 4 роки тому +9

    ah yes, the tragic bombing of P e a l Harbor

  • @mortalstorm
    @mortalstorm 4 роки тому

    Totally agree with the previous comments in regard to giving credit for the shoot down of Yamamoto’s plane to all the participants of the raid. Indeed, the Navy Cross was awarded to all the members of the mission. However, there was a culture already in-bedded in the military flight community that awarded “Kills” and “Aces” to those pilots who were successful at downing enemy fighter planes. This served to foster an air of competition among the pilots, that at times, would cause some to use questionable judgement. With such a high value target that the Yamamoto mission presented, the competition for the kill would only have been accentuated. Only four of the eighteen P-38’s were designated as the “killer” flight with Lanphier and Barber as part of this segment, and the rest providing cover.
    Although the evidence seems to have weighed in Barber’s favor, each were awarded half of the kill for the downing of Yamamoto’s plane, which at the time seemed acceptable to all. In later years however, Barber became upset because Lanphier was publishing material that was intimating that he alone had shot down the Admiral’s plane. Lanphier continued to claim full credit until his death in 1987. Barber carried on trying to get the record changed so that he would have received full credit for the downing of Yamamoto until his death in 2001. It is sad that these brave men had let their ego’s get the better of them in their later years.
    As a further aside, the official report was ammended to reflect that none of the Japanese fighters were shot down thereby taking away the fighter kills reported by Lanphier and Barber. This effectively removed Lanphier’s “Ace” status from the records as it reduced his total number of verified fighter kills from five to four.
    The bottom line is that both these men were brave pilots along with all the others who participated in the mission. Sometimes in the confusion of combat the actual events that occur become muddled and the combatants recollections of the events don’t always dovetail with reality. These pilots tended to be very competitive, so at times details of a mission may have become embellished somewhat. This should not take away from their greater accomplishments during this time in history; because these few, are owed so much by so many (credit to Sir Winston Churchill).