New angle of Harry Kane penalty incident during England win emerges and it's got everyone talking!
Вставка
- Опубліковано 25 сер 2024
- Welcome to Matchday News!
England beat the Netherlands 2-1 on Wednesday to book their spot in the final of Euro 2024.
The Dutch were furious with the defeat as they singled out Felix Zwayer's decision to award a penalty to the Three Lions.
Denzel Dumfries was adjudged to have fouled Kane, who made no mistake from the spot as he converted to cancel out Xavi Simons' opener.
Ollie Watkins grabbed a late winner to secure a famous win for his side in Dortmund.
Pierre van Hooijdonk launched an extraordinary attack as he said the referee should be 'blacklisted' while Virgil van Dijk was left furious with the German official.
A new clip of the penalty incident involving Kane and Dumfries has surfaced online and shows Bukayo Saka's role in the moment.
Footage appears to show the Arsenal winger handling the ball before Dumfries makes contact with Kane.
Dutch fans on social media believe they were robbed by VAR while England supporters argued Saka didn't touch the ball with his hand.
Don't forget to like, comment, and subscribe for more football updates!
#euro2024 #euro2024germany #euro2024qualifier #footbalnews
- didn't call Saka hands
- gave unfair penalty to England
- potential penalty on Gakpo not checked
- Corner to The Netherlands right before Watkins goal not given
- Countless calls in favor of England as soon as The Netherlands started getting dangerous
Easily one the biggest robberies in football history, but they won't talk about it because most football media channels are from England itself. Bloody cheats and that's why karma always gets them. This time Spain will do the job 😂
Spain deserved to win the tournament. Feel its a bit unfair to say England are cheats though. Unless you saying they paid the ref? Otherwise not their fault the ref makes bad calls. They didnt deserve to be in a final though.
@@anish9342 These are all facts. Of course the English are blind to all those facts because hey, it's in their teams favour.
England has some of the worst fans, saying things like this was actually a fair win over the Netherlands..
LMAO not seen one this funny yet
@@RA-el6zj Learn to rules of the game before shouting out you know the facts. IFAB Law
@@Johnmillward9092 Learn to watch a game with a neutral eye. Then, you can clearly see the Netherlands got robbed.
The penalty is not a penalty. Saka even made hands before it, so most definitely, no penalty.
And even the last goal by England (even tough it was a nice goal) was set up by the referee, which gave 3 fouls to a Dutch player that did absolutely nothing wrong in a row in the last 5 minutes or so... this way obviously the Dutch pressure got stopped and the English got their free chance, then made good use of it.
All in all an obvious robbery. It should have been the Netherlands in the final.
But Karma strikes back Spain European champion
Spain saved Football!!😅
To be fair, something can be said for both viewpoints. First half England was clearly better, but second half the Dutch were the more threatening team, with some excellent saves by the English goalkeeper. I think it's stupid to say the Dutch were furious, they were more disappointed in the moment. And whereas the English have had some luck with these decisions falling their way, the Dutch have both in WC and EC matches had the decisions consistently fall against them. Match could have gone either way. Both teams played the best match they played so far and it was a good match to watch unlike the Argentine Dutch match, which was a terrible clusterfuck with a Spanish referee speaking Spanish with the Argentine players..
Excellent points. And the English have had some hurts over the years too.
The law states that any player who lunges in with studs showing is yellow/red card offence. The Dutch player raised his foot with his studs showing. This is regarded as dangerous play. That's why it was deemed a penalty.
Try telling that to all the bitter europeans.. england have already won even if they loose IN THE FINAL! 😅
Clearly a foul but you'd have to ignore the handball
@@user-sx7ie6li9i Clearly the Dutch defender did NOT lunge at Kane. He was only blocking Kane's shot and his boots was NOT high at all, but same level with Kane's knee !! It was Kane who had kicked the Dutch player's boot !! VAR should have noticed that just half a second earlier, Saka had clrealry passed the ball with his hand to Kane !! These incompetent VAR officials and the refree must be banned for life for such a disgraceful blunder!! Holland was clearly robbed!! Unbelievable!!
@user-sx7ie6li9i,you never played football in your life. Kane kicked the Dutch defender's foot when the defender tried to block the shoot,never a penalty in a million years. The defender's foot wasn't even that high,after all football is a contact sport.
@user-sx7ie6li9i The Dutch player did NOT lunge at or tackle Kane. Where is the proof of this? Secondly, the Dumfries boot was never high, nor his studs were aimed at Kane. All these are NOT true!! That was a clean attempt to block the shot. It's Kane who had kicked and caught Dumfries boot!! It's so shocking that VAR would unnecessarily stop the play and penalize a player for something that did NOT happen.. and yet could not spot that clear handball by Saka !! VAR is being manipulative !! Disgraceful!!
They say a referee cant be that bad, these people can't of seen the Chelsea vs Barcelona match where Chelsea were robbed out of around 3 penalties and 4 free kicks.
Why does a Chelsea fan always bring up the game against Barcelona. I belive it was around 2 years earlier when John Terry fouled the goalkeeper when scoring a goal which knocked Barcelona out of champions league. That's never mentioned by Chelsea fans.
@@paulbuckle2081 I dont recall that but the reason we mention Barcelona is because it was the biggest robbery in football, even worse than Englands defeat to Argentina with the hand of god goal.
Why say "everyone is talking"?
Am not talking and there are millions of us!
Then why are you here bro? You can't have come here from politics videos🤔
You are now talking about it, suggesting that you aint
Clearly NOT a penalty!! The VAR and refree must be blind NOT to see that ... it was Kane who kicked the Dutch defender's boot ... then instantly took a dive ...and only half a second before that there was this Saka's handball !! Holland was clearly robbed!! Unbelievable!!
Robbed ? Are you a Dutch comedian ? Most neutral pundits agree England were the better side. Get over it.
Every time Saka has been ragged around comes to mind.
How can some people say not a handball? You can clearly see Saka's right hand going up because he touches the ball/ball touches his hand. If youre not convinced this is a handball, then what is he doing with his left arm after that? And then the ball goes directly to Kane. It should never have been a penalty.
Show this to the Netherlands player so that they can appeal for a handball 😂
Dont forget to pay the ref
@@hanslinden5289 That's what the Europeans always do 👍🤣
He should be called Felix Hoyzer
@@hanslinden5289 🤣🤣🤣
@@hanslinden5289 Boo hoo! 😢
What a robbery...
Ball to hand...NOT hand to ball.
So England not aloud any luck. About time we had some
What you talking about ... England had all the luck ... starting with the being in the weaker side of the draw
@@LevyHappyClapper l am talking about over the years. Lost shit loads penalty shoot outs. And hand off god
@@LevyHappyClapper you must be either a Scot, Irish or Welsh or maybe just another self loathing Englishman
@@LevyHappyClapper how can that be luck when the draw is simply based on how nations do in their group? France and Belgium bottled their group games it really is as simple as that.
You'll need all the luck in the world on sunday
The referee was clearly against the dutch, this was clear at the first part.
The english players noten this and started a theater, and did not play the reall game.
This referee is a disgrace for the sport.
Bud done is done england won the game
The problem is eufa wants a no tackle policy brought in through the back door that's why every tackle got a yellow carg and it's ruining the game
no touch football
I don't watch football unless it's England in a major tournament, because it's NOT the game I played and loved in the 70's. It was always a physical game, not now which is a real shame.
@@davidmansfield1796 exactly
Kane kicked Dumfies
If you run a red light and another car on green hit you- who’s at fault?
@@chyud9143 He is joking :)
@@craigrothwell6144it’s actually pretty true
Yes, Kane kicked the Dumfries... but the dumb VAR idiots and refree gave the penalty to England!! And just a split second before this ... VAR had ignored a clear handball by Saka !! How convenient!!
@@chyud9143 Dumfries is the light, Kane is the car
I don’t give a shit, we experienced worse with Maradonna hand of god
2 wrongs make a right ?
@@LevyHappyClapper how about Koeman and the pulling down of David Platt in the box back in 94 in qualifying. No penalty given and no red card for Koeman, so three wrongs make a right
@@williammohan9784 penalties should not be given for fouls outside the box.
The myth has arisen a penalty was denied unjustifiably regarding platt.
@@pato2200 I take it English is not your first language dear heart
@@pato2200 Karma is a bitch 🤣🤣🤣 Holland were beaten by the better team on wednesday.
Kane is the best actor award winner..😂😂😂
Do you really think Dumfries didn't connect with Kane's foot?
@@Paul-eb4jpyou mean Kane connected with his foot.
@TimBouman Kane got the ball the defender didn't, his foot was in a dangerous position with his studs up, anyway the Ref and VAR said it was it doesn't matter what we think.
R.I.P VAR
SAKA didn’t touched the ball with his hand.
But touched with his 3RD-HAND.😂
If you can win with honisty,then working with the refree,this will be remember also as the hand of god and the foot of god..😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Watkins’ goal won it for us, which would have been an equaliser for us without the pen.
Kane dived for a penalty in the last Euros.
Every time saka has been ragged around comes to mind
Payback for Koeman v Platt
Do I not like orange!
True, plus it was a penalty. His studs were up.
Indeed. Only took 30 years!
Indeed. Only took 30 years!
Koeman should have got sent off 30 years ago for fouling Platt. But it clearly wasn't a penalty. 2 wrong decisions. 2 wrongs don't make a right.
ENGLAND shouldn't have a play in the EC 4 its no EU member (brexit) and should not longer be allowed 2 play in the EC. Period!!.!
What ? Being in the EU has nothing to do with it. That is politics..this is football.
The tournament is for all EUROPEAN countries NOT members of the European Union. There are many countries that play that ARE not a member of the EU. Switzerland for example is part of the European economic area but NOT the eu.
another person who doesn't understand the difference between the EU and Europe. There are 27 EU members, and around 50 European countries
You talk shit
So Norway can't play in the Euros then?
But Saka DID handle the vall...that was a penalty toooooo
Too much money involved for the tournament not to be controlled the fix is in always
VAR has only made it so much easier to manipulate and fix matches for the gaming industry!!
Karma. Still, not an obstruction this time.
Karma for what haha. England supporters got the biggest victim complex.
The VAR is introduced for MatchFixing it seems. What are your thougths?😢
Absolutely 💯!! Everyone knows FIFA is so corrupted and is influenced by the gaming industry!! Fixing matches is common!!
The penalty tied the score at 1-1 in the 18th minute!!!! The Netherlands had an incredible 72 minutes!!!!! to get a second goal and didn't. So who is to blame the referee or the Dutch players for not being able to score again in 72 minutes!!!!!. Easier to blame the referee rather than the useless Dutch players.
They are not lucky they have to pay the refs!!
dutch players studs went in to tackle dangerous play for me ref got it right and so did var poor losers
the only part the ref got wrong was dumfries should've been sent off. Disgraceful tackle that.
Never a penalty
You all missed Saka handling the ball?
not dangerous at all
I'm not sure if the ball touched his hand but Dumfries got Kane and missed the ball completely.
Did you look at the right hand? Next to that Dumfries only tried to block the ball, not to hit it directly.
@@trancemb Get over it.
@@Paul-eb4jp Stupid answer, should have made more goals in the first place. You could have said "Thanks, didn't see that" instead.
@trancemb Okay I'll give a more grown up response, I've watched the incident over and over and it's not clear if the ball touched Saka's hand, even if it did it doesn't mean it was handball and much depends on the ref's interpretation of the rules, was it intentional? Did he gain control of the ball? The way the ball was spinning and the way it looped up it's impossible to say, without the use of the snickometer we can't even be sure there was contact, however we certainly didn't need the snickometer to know that Dumfries studs were raised and made clear contact with Kane's foot, if he'd got something on the ball then fine but he didn't.
The penalty was a teensy bit fortunate for England, but we've had plenty of rough luck when it mattered in the past. We'll just have to see how we get on against the play acting, referee conners from sunny Spain, MoRATa for one. Go get em lads!!
You can argue all you want about technicalities but there was only one team that were better on the night; the one that won.
HAHAHAHA i'm guessing your a toff AKA english
Both teams were equally bad
Spain will win it
Spot on mate, hasn’t football always been this way.. hand of god etc. It just worked out for England this time. Get in!! 🏴
They argue not because they better than winner or they want to change the result,but they just want to show the truth..and not all winner are better team,ur word are useless,not fact..
Yeah yeah yeah……and Lampards goal that clearly crossed the line in that World Cup game…..that was not allowed, even though the whole world could see the ball clearly did cross the line by a country mile….well, karma came home…..
Yes
What karma? English fans got the biggest victim complex. Little England vs the mean world.... Why am i hearing you lot blame us for the Lampard goal and hand of god moment? God, you're thick in the head.
And it was Watkins’ goal that won it for us, not the pen. They should stop crying. 😂
@@phoenixrose1192 What kind of nonsense is this? If the penalty was not given (which it shouldn't have) then Watkins goal would've made it 1-1. You lot aren't the brightest bunch are you?
@@TheDutchyNL Quite the contrary. Watkins’ goal was the equaliser in open play. So extra time would have been given without the pen…has the penny dropped yet? 🤡
The Dutch had no complaints when Koeman wasn’t sent off for pulling back David Platt then scored the opening goal which put us out of the World Cup I think.
England, just lucky ! 😅
In previous games, maybe. But they were the better side in this match, without question.
@@bonglesnodkins329 agreed, our best match so far
Definitely was a penalty,the defender had his studs up …end of.
So, handball by saka does not count?
Obviously you have never played football. I am 71 years old now and played amateur level football until I was 41. I only mention this because I was a central defender and all I can say the Dutch defender was attempting to play the ball and not the man. It was Kanes follow through that brought him into contact with the defender. The ball deviated from its true path indicating that the defender did actually make contact with the ball. No Penalty.
Academy award by Kane .... end of.
100% Correct. What else could he do, allow Kane a free shot at goal? The ball was not on the ground when the shot was made. You are absolutely right.
@@49537480game has changed massively since 70's, 80's so I don't see what you playing then has got to do with decisions made nowadays. It was a penalty, debatable yes, but still a valid pen... and I'm scottish so certainly no bias here
Can we have one on Rice being fouled when the Dutch scored.
If you sont understand the new handball rule, dont make a video about it . Even if it did touch it didn't matter off the deflection, unless a goal was scored. If the goal is scored dor the attacking team, any touch off the hand, deflection or unintended, is still handball
and all those saying it was a penalty would be saying the opposite if it happened the other way round.
Kane lyiny on the ground in pain .i cant beliebe he could take the penalty .what a fake.
Ronald koeman 1993
@jordanon95 Exactly! What goes around, comes around.
EXACTLY. SAY NO MORE😅😅
Yep, I have been waiting 31 years for retribution……that free kick should never had been given…..mind you Shilts goal position was……awful…anyway….revenge is best served cold ….
@@karlhoward2737 actually it was David Seaman in goal in that game,
@@karlhoward2737 Rijkaard had a goal wrongly chalked off for offside but both Koeman's should've been sent off, Erwin Koeman got away with a studs up lunge not long after their first goal.
Footbal is coming home 😂 ! Viva Espana !
Is everyone in here thick in the head? Lot of people here still going on about Dumfries while ignoring the clear handball.
Obviously it's not a CLEAR handball ...the angle in this video does not 100% show a handball as its from behind the player so can be misconstrued....however if you watch the USA coverage they had 3 angles of it and 1 of them actually does CLEARLY show it didn't hit his hand....do your research before calling people idiots instead of relying on a video that is not a clear angle at all
@@davidhollis7229 You should look at other closer angles. He literally handballs it twice. How about you do some research yourself before you start running that mouth of yours. You can literally see the ball change its spin the second time he handballs it.
@@TheDutchyNL *The Laws of the Game: Law 12- Fouls and Misconduct:*
For the purposes of determining handball offences, the upper boundary of the arm is in line with the bottom of the armpit. Not every touch of a player’s hand/arm with the ball is an offence.
It is an offence if a player:
- deliberately touches the ball with their hand/arm, for example moving the hand/arm towards the ball
- touches the ball with their hand/arm when it has made their body unnaturally bigger. A player is considered to have made their body unnaturally bigger when the position of their hand/arm is not a consequence of, or justifiable by, the player’s body movement for that specific situation. By having their hand/arm in such a position, the player takes a risk of their hand/arm being hit by the ball and being penalised.
- scores in the opponents' goal:
- directly from their hand/arm, even if accidental, including by the goalkeeper
- immediately after the ball has touched their hand/arm, even if accidental
There was nothing unfair about that game, the defender didn't mean to hurt Kane but the fact that his studs still hit him makes it a foul. Saka's unintentional contact with his arm that made little difference to the ball's direction does not make it a handball. So please stop using these stupid reasons as an excuse to why the Dutch lost. We are better accept that instead of acting like sour losers.
Wrong, the defenders studs didn’t hit Kane, Kane hit the defenders studs. Pretty significant difference. Dumfries blocked, didn’t have his leg stretched, Kane followed through on a mid air ball and then hit Dumfries. In no way that is dangerous play from the defender and in no universe should that ever be a penalty.
@@Dropje86 Look at the picture taken at 0:53 and tell me his studs did not hit Kane's foot. The defender should have not faced his studs up to him but instead the top of his shoe where you are supposed to kick a ball. It is his fault for trying to block the ball with the bottom of his foot so i don't know why you or anyone else would defend him like it is just common sense he did the wrong thing 😂
@@Dropje86 It doesn't matter. By raising his studs, Dumfries opens up the possibility of a dangerous play contact foul. If you read the IFAB laws, there is nothing that says it is only classified as a foul if the contact is made intentionally by the player with the studs up. Dumfries wants to try to block the shot with his studs up? Okay, although technically that's an IFK offence if another player is going for the ball. But when Kane's follow-through makes contact, it becomes a contact foul by Dumfries, EVEN IF DUMFRIES DIDN'T INTEND THAT CONTACT. It's very similar to the "hands in a natural position" logic with handballs. Even if you didn't intend it, it's on you if it happens. DFK foul, in the area, thus a penalty. That's why the VAR team brought it to the referee's attention.
Kane was not hurt ... acting
@@Dropje86correct
If one look’s at the footage one can clearly see that number 7 Chappie has in-fact hindered the travel motion of the football, by means of his arm limb. Therefore a penalty should quite clearly not be awarded to the English/British team.
The footage does not show a handball
It does, are you blind?
Even if the penalty wasn’t given England would have won in my opinion. It’s football! Sometimes decisions are for you and sometimes it goes the other way. England has had its share of decisions against them. You can argue to the cows come home it’s not going to change anything. I say win convincingly and play as your life depends on it to the last second. Spain will be tough and forget about getting lucky with decisions. Don’t sit back even if you leading, go in with the attitude of smashing them not playing safe. Nothing to lose and everything to gain. Come on England 🏴
Well said
Why would England have won without the penalty? As more time went on... they played worse and worse. The Dutch had the upper hand for most of the second half, and England needed the ref to call for 3 non-existing fouls of a Dutch player in a row in the last 5 minutes or so to turn the game around and finally get that chance to score..
If it was 1-1 and it went to extra time, i'd say the Dutch were on their way to victory.
But we will never know, as the ref/var decided England should move on to the finals.
Sometimes? We literally get robbed every time. We are stuck playing football while other teams are allowed to play volleyball. Saka this Euros, Messi last world cup against us as well. But when de ligt slips and touches the ball in EURO 2020 it's an immediate red card. UEFA and FIFA want the Netherlands to fail.
That fact his studs are showing towards Kane is probably the reason the penalty was given
@@foggy4891 Not just showing but connected with Kane's foot.
Shouldn't matter because a handball preceded it, not a pen.
@@TheDutchyNL Except there was no handball.
@@Paul-eb4jp There was. He handballed it twice in fact. Stop being delusional please.
@@Paul-eb4jp You can literally see the ball change its spin as it hits his arm the 2nd time.
Kane got the shot off then the tackle then the contact made..so these calls happen...it was lucky fr England
It doesn't matter if the dangerous contact is made after the shot is off. It's still a foul.
I'm Dutch and England deserves the final. They played very well in the first half. Hope they beat Spain
talk about 1 incident.....the game was secondary we don't talk about the game anymore ...
Penalty or not, something needs to be done about this ridiculous hand ball rule when it is clear on many occasions that it would have been impossible for a player to get his hand out of the way, so much so that you often get the attacking side deliberately aiming at that region of the defender knowing it is going to be a Penally come what may.
For once, I agree with Gary Neville. Never a penalty. Simply saying that the better team won is a bollocks comment. Football is notoriously fickle. Ball in the net, and the decisions that lead to them, are what's important. And that decision for Kane was just wrong. He had already hit the ball, and the connection from Drumfries did not affect that. At worst, it was an indirect free kick.
Too true there they were fortunate yet again lucky all the way as per usual Spain will out play a far better team too many individuals in the England team 😂.
Gary Neville is a defender who always sides with defenders. Gary Neville is not a referee. Gary Neville is wrong according to the IFAB laws of the game.
@bonglesnodkins329 Wasn't just Neville who said it shouldn't have been a penalty, it was all the pundits on the panel.
@@davedooler9051 Yeah, and they'll all tell you that ball-to-hand handballs aren't handballs. They're still living in the football world they personally played in (and even then they wouldn't have grasped the subtleties of every rule).
Same people hail Maradona for handball against England. Same people show no outrage when lampards goal didn't cross the line.
Same people call chielini pull back on saka when through on goal 4 years ago a good tactical foul.
Dumfries should've been sent off for that tackle.
You're delusional
It's called ' Leaving the leg in ' every professional should know this. Leaving the studs up for the foot to catch them after kicking the ball. Definite foul therefore definite penalty.
Never heard of Sarker before lol but have heard of a SAKA poorly done.
It was handball
I'm not the first to say pay back for koeman
Sour grapes.
How about none of this matters? It's past, and we're in the final 😂
SAKA hands the ball 5 seconds b4 the clash between Kane and Dumfriess how did Var not see this?
Wtf the game has finished move on 😂😂
Give over. Every week, anywhere on the pitch, that tackle is given as a free kick. Even a yellow card. So, doing it in the box is a definite penalty.
They would say that wouldn't they it's sour grapes
Saka used his hand before it got to Kane.. Cheating England of course..
it doesn't matter. people always find excuses when they lose. the fact is the dutch didn't manage to scores to win the game. england did, in the last min.
and what would the outcome be if they did not get the soft penalty ?
@@LevyHappyClapper England would have not played the same if they were 1-0 down. And England were by far the better team unlucky not to score 3 or 4 this game. Don't be a sore loser Holland were outplayed.
@@intenzityd3181 England had one shot on goal in second half. How are they better, just because they have ball possession in own half, playing with 5 defenders 🤣🤣
@@BR-ip5pz They definitely had more than 1 shot on target in the first half…because they utterly dominated about 15 mins of it.
Besides, Watkins’ goal would have equalised anyway, so cry harder. 😂😂
@@phoenixrose1192 England got exposed to the world as divers and cheaters
Studs up and late. Anywhere else on the pitch, and it's a foul, yellow card, and could be deemed dangerous play.
Doesn't matter, handball preceded it. No pen.
Xavi Simons clearly fouled Rice for his goal but that doesn't fit the nararive.
Anyway i never like england soccer, never like if england...eventually they were defeated by spain, the team that play better soccer than boring game of england as always
Lol must be luck the ref being German 😂
So no conclusive proof that Saka touched it, but conclusive proof that Dumfries went in studs first which is a foul. Got it. Keep crying.
Did we not watch the same video?
I think you should pay a visit to an optician.
"Studs first" on a player to TACKLE them is an issue. Now be Dumfries.. would you try to block the shot? (This isn't basketball) To block that shot your studs are up. If he aimed to hit Kane he missed. Plus the defender's foot came in AFTER the shot got off. No attempt to injure or tackle Kane. Their feet touched side edge to side edge.... and of course Kane goes down howls in pain holding the top of his foot then springs up to take the penalty. Yes that's football but facts are facts via diverse visual evidence.
@@thepaulmacfarlane Dumfries would have got a yellow card on midfield so yes, it was a pen.
@@TheDutchyNL Where was the handball then? And the studs were up.
Was a 50/50 . No penalty. I always thought that it had to be deliberate handball to be a penalty.
saka hands ball before HAHAHAHAHAHAH VAR is a joke man some other company need to sponser these big tournaments kick the goddamn var out and bring in some professionals man it's ruining football slowly
Any place outside penalty area and it's a free kick why not a pen
How you can have a referee who has been banned for match fixing ever referee a game again is an endictment of the corruption within football. Shameful.
This is not true. He was never banned for match fixing. This information is false
@@joedema7504 Now England has won by cheating with this matchfixing ref you guys are suddenly trying to act like what he did never happened? The nerve.... He was banned for 6 months, stop spreading misinformation.
dumb fries?
England v Spain Final 2024 European championships. Full stop 😂
See it in full speed. There was no way his hand could get out of the way
I don't even think he touched the ball with his hand. You'd need technology like ultraedge that they have in cricket to be certain, but I doubt that'll ever happen.
Why nobody wants to see the previous foul by Simon on Rice before the first goal? Clear foul and yellow card with that. End of discussion.
We should not complain and take example to how the British handle these things!! Eg 2021 Max WC 😂 and not talk about 2008 were a robbed WC has taken place😂
I'm from Africa don't Even favor England in this tournament but that was a penalty not a hand ball. Spain are winning it.🥇🏆
It was a handball
England owe Felix bigtime.
Remember Sol Campbells disallowed goal?
Who gives a toss ,get over it .
You lot still complain about the hand of god moment.
That's handball but not from cucurella-clown? 😂
I've watched England for 20yrs and we've been robbed by nearly every team , so it makes a refreshing change , I also don't give a s__t
About time we had a ref on our side for once. How many times as it gone the other way for us. England have been robbed for years
If we had lost ,we would have been whinging too , robbed of a penalty,
England would have probably gotten it back without a penalty,
,and would have won on the penalty shoot out.
Who cares we are in the final and thats that..how many times we see england robbed of bad decision.a alot more often then any other team..so bollox come on england ❤❤
Have some decency, there's more people on the world than just you. And false, we get robbed every tournament. Against you this euros, against Argentina last world cup, against Czechia in euro 2020... the list goes on.
@@TheDutchyNL have some decency...I'm stating facts...you can't change the score or out come after the match..the results stand.oh and yes that was definitely a penalty.everyone know if your showing studs first in any challenge its a foul.our 2nd goal was top class. I'm guessing your just pissed off because your out.i would be too after the refs bad decisions
@@100english12 You're not stating facts, you're spewing nonsense. It should've never been a penalty because Saka touched the ball with his hand TWICE right before it. Remember that kinda heartbeat sensor they showed in one of the first games after a handball? Where was that? They literally chalked off a goal from Belgium for a similair thing this very Euro....
I don't mind losing, i mind losing due to incredibly bad calls, something that has happened to us THREE tournaments in a ROW now.
Who the f**k invented the expression"fair play" ? Well, to say the truth, In fact I’m glad England made to the final. It’s just so much fun seeing them loose a second final in a row 😂😅
Whats the deal? England (Britain) back in the EU after winning (giving) the EC? Hope not.. but surely they get their ass kicked sunday!
Dangerous intervention!Penalty
It’s coming home 😂
Is home Spain ?
I am afraid its not 😂
sour grapes
Pay back for Koeman .......what goes around comes around ........ defender went in studs showing .....penalty
Never a penalty because of the handball preceding it
England nearly scored two more goals - one off the line and one offside. Netherlands didn't do anything else after 7 minutes 😂