UA-cam Shadow Banning again Please share, like and comment to break the Algorithm Tell us, where you’re watching from? Brothers and Sisters! Please Like, Comment and Share the video to help us reach more people so you can share in the reward in sha Allah! *SUPPORT DAWAHWISE* ❤www.patreon.com/dawahwise ❤gofund.me/dba0c96f ❤www.paypal.me/dawahwise ❤Join DawahWise Membership: ua-cam.com/users/DawahWisejoin
the fa.Yke comission matt 28.19 isnt found in any manuscript befire the 3rd century. Not only did they add in that " paulanity was now to be spread to the world" they later, had to add in the trinity to this already added command Edmund Schlink, The Doctrine of Baptism, page 28: “The baptismal command in its Matthew 28:19 form can not be the historical origin of Christian baptism. At the very least, it must be assumed that the text has been transmitted in a form expanded by the [Catholic] church..,,..,.
The Catholic Encyclopedia, II, page 263: “The baptismal formula was changed from the name of Jesus Christ to the words Father, Son, and Holy Spirit by the Catholic Church in the second century.” The Tyndale New Testament Commentaries, I, 275: “It is often affirmed that the words in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost are not the ipsissima verba [exact words] of Jesus, but…a later liturgical addition.”,
wake up! they had to add the trinity later Many Christians use this verse to prove the existence of the Trinity. For there are three that bear witness in heaven: the Father, the Word, and the Holy Spirit; and these three are one. (1 John 5:7) The issue with this verse is that it is universally recognized by Biblical scholars and historians, including thirty-two Christian scholars of the highest eminence backed by fifty cooperating Christian denominations, as being inserted by the Church later. Since it was proven that this verse is a fabrication, it has been deleted from some of the later Bibles, such as the Revised Standard Version and the New Revised Standard Version...,,.,
Bruce Metzger, the premier New Testament textual critic, writes: “Matthew and Luke suppress or weaken references in Mark to such human emotions of Jesus as grief and anger and amazement as well as Jesus’ unrequited love; they also omit Mark’s statement that Jesus’ friends thought he was beside himself”. He explains further, that: “The later gospels omit what might imply that Jesus was unable to accomplish what he willed…and also omit questions asked by Jesus which might be taken to imply his ignorance.”[3] Metzger continues further by enumerating instances where Matthew and Luke soften Mark’s statements which might minimize the majesty of Jesus and replaced it with illustrations of a more alluring and authoritative Jesus. In the story of the fig tree as found in Mark, the disciples did not notice the withering of the tree until next morning. For Matthew, this seemed less dramatic and unimpressive, and hence in his narrative the tree withered at once, leaving the disciples in shock and amazement. Matthew and Luke were adamant in changing the words of Jesus. They wanted to make Jesus say what they wanted people to believe, “reflecting a later stage of theological understanding than that in Mark.” (Metzger, pg 83) It seems quite clear that during both the pre and post gospel stages of the gospel traditions transmission, the available material was molded, filtered and changed in direct correlation to the Christological convictions of those who handled the traditions. It is important to stress that this is not a case of the evangelists’ mere differing in emphasis; rather there are numerous occasions when the later gospel writers go out of their way to modify and alter the earlier version. Therefore, if we wish to come close to the historical Jesus in the gospels, it is a good starting point to compare the stories in the various gospels, to discern where the story has altered.
Brother Hashim without his trademark cap if I can call it that looks like a totally different person. May Allah the Almighty bless him and his family members, ameen.
بارك الله الأخ هاشم أحب طريقته في الدعوة شخص متمكن ودارس جيد لكتاب النصارى وملم به و بنصوصه المحرفة وتفسيرات العلماء النصارى و يحاجهم بكتابهم وتفسيرات علمائهم بطريقة سهلة وواضحة وبثبات وثقة زاده الله تمكناً وجعله الله سبباً أن يهدي الله على يديه الضلال من العباد آمين
👉 *2 Samuel **7:22* *How great You are, O Lord GOD! For there is none like You, and there is no God but You,* according to everything we have heard with our own ears. 👉 *Exodus 9:14* Otherwise, I will send all My plagues against you and your officials and your people, *so you may know that there is no one like Me in all the earth.* 👉 *Isaiah 40:18* To whom then will ye liken God? or what likeness will ye compare unto him?
the fa.Yke comission matt 28.19 isnt found in any manuscript befire the 3rd century. Not only did they add in that " paulanity was now to be spread to the world" they later, had to add in the trinity to this already added command Edmund Schlink, The Doctrine of Baptism, page 28: “The baptismal command in its Matthew 28:19 form can not be the historical origin of Christian baptism. At the very least, it must be assumed that the text has been transmitted in a form expanded by the [Catholic] church..,,..,.
The Catholic Encyclopedia, II, page 263: “The baptismal formula was changed from the name of Jesus Christ to the words Father, Son, and Holy Spirit by the Catholic Church in the second century.” The Tyndale New Testament Commentaries, I, 275: “It is often affirmed that the words in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost are not the ipsissima verba [exact words] of Jesus, but…a later liturgical addition.”,
wake up! they had to add the trinity later Many Christians use this verse to prove the existence of the Trinity. For there are three that bear witness in heaven: the Father, the Word, and the Holy Spirit; and these three are one. (1 John 5:7) The issue with this verse is that it is universally recognized by Biblical scholars and historians, including thirty-two Christian scholars of the highest eminence backed by fifty cooperating Christian denominations, as being inserted by the Church later. Since it was proven that this verse is a fabrication, it has been deleted from some of the later Bibles, such as the Revised Standard Version and the New Revised Standard Version...,,.,
Bruce Metzger, the premier New Testament textual critic, writes: “Matthew and Luke suppress or weaken references in Mark to such human emotions of Jesus as grief and anger and amazement as well as Jesus’ unrequited love; they also omit Mark’s statement that Jesus’ friends thought he was beside himself”. He explains further, that: “The later gospels omit what might imply that Jesus was unable to accomplish what he willed…and also omit questions asked by Jesus which might be taken to imply his ignorance.”[3] Metzger continues further by enumerating instances where Matthew and Luke soften Mark’s statements which might minimize the majesty of Jesus and replaced it with illustrations of a more alluring and authoritative Jesus. In the story of the fig tree as found in Mark, the disciples did not notice the withering of the tree until next morning. For Matthew, this seemed less dramatic and unimpressive, and hence in his narrative the tree withered at once, leaving the disciples in shock and amazement. Matthew and Luke were adamant in changing the words of Jesus. They wanted to make Jesus say what they wanted people to believe, “reflecting a later stage of theological understanding than that in Mark.” (Metzger, pg 83) It seems quite clear that during both the pre and post gospel stages of the gospel traditions transmission, the available material was molded, filtered and changed in direct correlation to the Christological convictions of those who handled the traditions. It is important to stress that this is not a case of the evangelists’ mere differing in emphasis; rather there are numerous occasions when the later gospel writers go out of their way to modify and alter the earlier version. Therefore, if we wish to come close to the historical Jesus in the gospels, it is a good starting point to compare the stories in the various gospels, to discern where the story has altered.
GROSS: So Jesus saw himself as the messiah. What else did that mean in its time? EHRMAN: Well, a lot of Christians today have a wrong idea about what the messiah was supposed to be. The word messiah is a Hebrew word that literally means the anointed one. This was used in reference to the kings of Israel. The ancient kings of Israel, when they became king during the coronation ceremony, would have oil poured on their head as a sign of divine favor. And so the king of Israel was called God's anointed one, the messiah. There came a point at which there was no longer a king ruling Israel, and some Jewish thinkers began to maintain that there would be a future king of Israel, a future anointed one, and they called that one the messiah. And so the messiah for most Jews simply referred to the future king of Israel. And so when Jesus told his disciples that he himself was the messiah, he was saying that in the future, when God establishes the kingdom once more, I myself will be the king of that kingdom. And so it's not that the messiah was supposed to be God. The messiah was not supposed to be God. The messiah was a human being So did Jesus' earliest followers consider him to be God? EHRMAN: Well, what I argue in the book is that during his lifetime, Jesus himself didn't call himself God and didn't consider himself God and that none of his disciples had any inkling at all that he was God. The way it works is that you do find Jesus calling himself God in the Gospel of John, our last Gospel. Jesus says things like: Before Abraham was, I am, and I and the father are one, and if you've seen me, you've see the father. These are all statements that you find only in the Gospel of John, and that's striking because we have earlier Gospels, and we have the writings of Paul, and in none of them is there any indication that Jesus said such things about him. I think it's completely implausible that Matthew, Mark and Luke would not mention that Jesus called himself God if that's what he was declaring about himself. That would be a rather important point to make. So this is not an unusual view among scholars. It's simply the view that the Gospel of John is providing a theological understand of Jesus that is not what was historically accurate. GROSS: Jesus was referred to as the king of the Jews. Did he call himself that, and what did that mean it is time? Do we know? Can we have any idea what that meant in its time? EHRMAN: Yeah, we do know, and actually to be a king of the Jews simply meant literally, being the king over Israel. It is a very difficult question to get to, what Jesus taught about himself because of the nature of our gospels, but one thing is relatively certain, that that the reason the Romans crucified Jesus was precisely because he was calling himself the king of Israel. Now, Jesus obviously was not the king. So what might he have meant by it? Well, what scholars have long thought is that Jesus was talking about not being put on the throne by means of some kind of political show of power, but that Jesus thought the world as he knew it was coming to an end and God was going to bring in a kingdom, a new kingdom in which there would be no more injustice or oppression or poverty or suffering of any kind. And in this kingdom, Jesus appears to have thought that he himself would be the future king. And so Jesus meant this not in the regular political sense but in a kind of apocalyptic sense, that at the end of the age, this is what was going to happen: he was going to be installed as king.
A prophet is someone SENT by God, God is not a prophet by definition, they are mutually exclusive. If this man was GOD, he would never have claimed to be a prophet or called a prophet by those who saw him. Matthew 21:11 And the crowds were saying, “This is the prophet Jesus, from Nazareth in Galilee.”
Luke 7:16 Fear gripped them all, and they began glorifying God, saying, “A great prophet has arisen among us!” John 4:19 The woman *said to Him, “Sir, I perceive that You are a prophet. Matthew 21:46 When they sought to seize Him, they feared the people, because they considered Him to be a prophet. John 6:14 Therefore when the people saw the sign which He had performed, they said, “This is truly the Prophet who is to come into the world.” John 7:40 Some of the people therefore, when they heard these words, were saying, “This certainly is the Prophet.” John 9:17 So they *said to the blind man again, “What do you say about Him, since He opened your eyes?” And he said, “He is a prophet.” Luke 24:19 And He said to them, “What things?” And they said to Him, “The things about Jesus the Nazarene, who was a prophet mighty in deed and word in the sight of God and all the people, Mark 6:15 But others were saying, “He is Elijah.” And others were saying, “He is a prophet, like one of the prophets of old.” Mark 8:28 They told Him, saying, “John the Baptist; and others say Elijah; but others, one of the prophets.” Luke 9:8 and by some that Elijah had appeared, and by others that one of the prophets of old had risen again. OK, so Jesus doesnt refute anybody calling him a Prophet, he reaffirms it😇 Luke 13:33 . . . . I must proceed on my way. For it wouldn’t do for a prophet of God to be kwil. Led except in Jerusalem. Mark 6:3-4 Then they scoffed . . . . They were deeply off. nded and refused to believe in him. Then Jesus told them, “A prophet is honored everywhere except in his own hometown and among his relatives and his own family”. In the above two verses, Jesus called himself a prophet. There are also many verses indicating that during his lifetime on earth the people in Judea and Galilee regarded him as a prophet. Regarding the verses in which Jesus says that he is equal to God (mainly in the Gospel of John) most scholars believe that Jesus never said that. It was what people started saying about him after his deaff and put on his lips in the Gospels written at least 4 decades later.,
💥 The original term in the Torah and Injeel is "Rabb, which means Lord/Master/Sustainer" not "Abb, which means Father". Surat Al-Fatiha in The Noble Qur'an starts with "Alhamdolellahy Rab Al'aalameen" not "Abb Al'aalameen". 👉 *Chapter 1 The Opening سورة الفاتحة - Al-Fatiha: Verse 2* الْحَمْدُ لِلَّهِ رَبِّ الْعَالَمِينَ Praise be to Allah, the Cherisher and Sustainer of the worlds;
Christians! Please avoid Hashim, and do not challenge to debate the Bible. His good knowledge will show no mercy and you will probably get angry and start shouting and insulting.
Quran 4:109 Here you are - those who argue on their behalf in [this] worldly life - but who will argue with Allah for them on the Day of Resurrection, or who will [then] be their representative?
Make a dawah towards al aqsa masjid and also need to know what we learn about the blessed people of Palestinians may Allah reward them the highest jannah insha Allah
He has an extensive amount of information, ranges a lot. I remember him actually is (not was but is) someone who is proficient in bible studies. Or I mixed up with another brother... But he has so many facts to backed it up. He never want to be right. he was correcting what was wrong. The reason you kept seeing him win is only because the opponent couldn't refute anymore when they were trapped in the corner by their own book
The term father is not exclusive to Jesus. John 20:17 the Lord Jesus after His resurrection tells Mary Magdalene to go to His brethren and say to them, “I ascend unto My Father, and your Father; and to My God, and your God.” The majesty of these words is almost beyond our understanding.
Jesus is worshiped after he ascended to heaven by the apostles Luke 24:50-53 The Ascension of Jesus 50 When he had led them out to the vicinity of Bethany, he lifted up his hands and blessed them. 51 While he was blessing them, he left them and was taken up into heaven. 52 THEN THEY WORSHIPED HIM AND RETURNED TO JERUSALEM WITH GREAT JOY AND THEY STAYED CONTINUALLY AT THE TEMPLE , PRAISING GOD.
The worship of gods in Greek is generally expressed by other words than the one translated `worship' in the New Testament. The Greek word translated `worship' in the New Testament seems to emphasize the bodily position of prostration involved in worship. As such it differs from the general usage of the Greek word, which implies giving honor by kissing or bowing to kiss the hand or even foot. This kind of worship in Greek generally was not for God or gods, but for people in high position from whom petitions are made. The worship of gods in Greek is generally expressed by other words. Most of the texts in the New Testament either refer clearly to worship of God or are somewhat ambiguous acts of homage. Some texts show clearly that the word does not imply divinity. Such an example is in Matthew 9:18. `While he speaks these things unto them, behold, there came a certain ruler, and worshipped him, saying, My daughter is even now dead...' This abject homage of the ruler was certainly not the worship of Jesus as God. Dictionaries of New Testament Greek made even by Trinitarian scholars recognize this variety in the usage of the word. Even Matthew 2:2,8,11; 20:20; Luke 4:7; 24:52 are considered by Harper and Row's Analytical Greek Lexicon to be examples of the word in which it does not imply divinity. The line between the two meanings will therefore often be determined by the faith of the reader, and as such cannot be construed as proof of the deity of Jesus.
GOD appeared to Abraham at the Oaks of Mamre while he was sitting at the entrance of his tent. It was the hottest part of the day. He looked up and saw three men standing. He ran from his tent to greet them and bowed before them. He said, “Master, if it please you, stop for a while with your servant. I’ll get some water so you can wash your feet. Rest under this tree. I’ll get some food to refresh you on your way, since your travels have brought you across my path.” They said, “Certainly. Go ahead.” Abraham hurried into the tent to Sarah. He said, “Hurry. Get three cups of our best flour; knead it and make bread.” Then Abraham ran to the cattle pen and picked out a nice plump calf and gave it to the servant who lost no time getting it ready. Then he got curds and milk, brought them with the calf that had been roasted, set the meal before the men, and stood there under the tree while they ate.
It's impossible that Hazrat Isa Alaihessalam ever called Allah "Father". It's impossible for a prophet to make such a mistake, and it's certainly impossible that Allah would ever allow a prophet to make such a ginormous mistake. To acknowledge that he ever did so is pure evil. Any book, including any bible, that states he referred to Allah as "Father" shows the extent to which those books have been perverted, corrupted, manipulated. The Muslim man here needs to wise up to this fact. Any book or historical record that refers to, or implies, Allah as being "Father" is the work of the devil and evil people.
Back in the time of Isa a.s. it is quite possible. They took the term Father to be literally a Father of Isa a.s., just the way they take so many things out of context. Therefore the Quran was revealed, to correct the mistakes.
as a somali i could see where the greeks or hebrews maybe got confused with the word " father ". we have arabic words , hebrew words, aramic words , heck even ancient egyptian words in our language. we have this words that we use for god sometimes. its " ebbe " and never " abba " becouse abba means littery father. but ebbe is reserved for allah only. we use many words for god. wr say ilah, ilahey ' allah" , and also " ebbe ( spelled eebeh sometimes ) " .. am sure this same words propaply used to exists in atamic aswell. becouse just like hebrews we also sat abba or abbo to mean father. i would not be suprised that aramic also had abba and aswll ebbe.. ebbe meaning god and abba meaning father. am sure the greeks just messed it up. we somalis have many words from othrr languages around the world. if yoy want ancient words then undetstand somali words. it comes in handy especialy with ancient egyptian words. bisad means cat for example in ancient egyotians. somali is the only language that uses the same word and many words of ancient civilizations. aramic the same. am pretty sure the word ebbe ( god ) entered the somalia language through the aramaic language aswell the word abba (father ) its ebbe/ebbee (god ) and not abba (father ) , the hebrews and greeks messed it up 😂😂😂. the difference between ancient egyptians and the aramic is the ancient egyptians left many words behind on walls. and it has many words in common with somali language, dont ask me how. if we could find only all the words that aramics used for god through the years would have been great. am sure ebbe ( or eebeh) or spelled different will be there
Hamzah, Muslims must also believe and follow the Bible as long as it does not contradict the Quran. And, believe and follow the Bible that its followers believe and follow the Bible. That is the essence of the command to believe in those books.
👉 *Jeremiah 8:8* 8 *“‘How can you say, “We are wise,* *for we have the law of the LORD,”* *when actually the lying pen of the scribes* *has handled it falsely?* 👉 *Jeremiah 23:36* 36 But you must not mention ‘a message from the LORD’ again, because each one’s word becomes their own message. *So you distort the words of the living God,* the LORD Almighty, our God.
lol If I ask a Christian about John 17:3 & they respond with a question is Allah a father? . Simple are you going to ask a Unitarian or a johova witness is Allah a father if they brought up the same verse
Gospel of john clearly do not teach about allah. The whole gospel teach Father Son and holy spirit as God. I mean same gospel of John jesus said everything father does he do the same. John start his gospel by pointing jesus as creator of everything.
@@abutalsafuba2179 Just a translation. In Swedish Bible it says Gud. Its just a title. In Aramaic, Greek, Hebrew it says Father. Jesus said Father 165 times in Bible so its very clear is not allah.
a simple question to ask questions when they bring up john 1 is to ask them where did Jesus say this? John is a human and we know by definition, humans are sinners. This is what they believe. John, needs Jesus' innocent blood to be forgiven too and is prone to the same stuff as the rest. He might have made up this passage. When and where did Jesus tell him this? this is the fundamental difference between many other religions and Islam. if someone tells me the sahaba said X. often, we have something where we find the Prophet muhammad says ABCDE....we look for it in hadith. we are given context. we see from where and how this came up. was it jut an opinion? was it from teh prophet? was it an exception? etc etc with christianity, it's make things up as you go. eg: they take the forsaken quote of jesus on the cross and say it's about psalms 22 or whatever it is. but in order to make it fit their beliefs....you have to competely ignore the actual context of psalms 22. instead they will focus on a few trigger words like pierce and just use the it's foreshadowing excuse. so for centuries, people read psalms 22 and knew to read it in context but all of a sudden...the actual story doesn't matter. you ignore it all and then just take a verse or two and make it about jesus.
👉 *Isaiah 45:5* *I am the LORD, and there is no other; apart from me there is no God.* I will strengthen you, though you have not acknowledged me, 👉 *Exodus 9:14* Otherwise, I will send all My plagues against you and your officials and your people, *so you may know that there is no one like Me in all the earth.* 👉 *Deuteronomy 4:35* You were shown these things *so that you would know that the LORD is God; there is no other besides Him.* 👉 *Deuteronomy 32:39* *See now that I am He; there is no God besides Me.* I bring death and I give life; I wound and I heal, *and there is no one who can deliver from My hand.* 👉 *Psalm 18:31* *For who is God besides the LORD?* And who is the Rock except our God? 👉 *Isaiah 43:10* "You are My witnesses," declares the LORD, "and My servant whom I have chosen, *so that you may consider and believe Me and understand that I am He. Before Me no god was formed, and after Me none will come.* 👉 *Isaiah 44:8* Fear ye not, neither be afraid: have not I told thee from that time, and have declared it? ye are even my witnesses. *Is there a God beside me? yea, there is no God; I know not any.* 👉 *Isaiah 46:9* Remember the former things of old: *for I am God, and there is none else; I am God, and there is none like me,*
When God said to Moses pbuh I am who I am now go forth and do what I told you to do the Pagans start jumping up and down clapping and shouting we’ve cracked it his name is I AM 🤦🏽 Poor Christians always get CORNERED in speakers CORNER 😂
👉 *Isaiah 45:14,18* 14 *This is what the Lord says:* “The products of Egypt and the merchandise of Cush, and those tall Sabeans- they will come over to you and will be yours; they will trudge behind you, coming over to you in chains. They will bow down before you and plead with you, saying, *‘Surely God is with you, and there is no other;* *there is no other god.’”* 18 For this is what the Lord says- he who created the heavens, he is God; he who fashioned and made the earth, he founded it; he did not create it to be empty, but formed it to be inhabited- he says: *“I am the Lord,* *and there is no other.* 👉 *Isaiah 45:20-21* 20 “Gather together and come; assemble, you fugitives from the nations. *Ignorant are those who carry about idols of wood,* *who pray to gods that cannot save.* 21 Declare what is to be, present it- let them take counsel together. Who foretold this long ago, who declared it from the distant past? *Was it not I, the Lord?* *And there is no God apart from me,* *a righteous God and a Savior;* *there is none but me.*
These Christian contradict themselves with John 1.1 god become flash right then they are saying according to their beleif who died on cross was god really blasphemy when god does not die its in their scripture (may allah forgive me for this saying blasphemy), dawah brothers should ask if god become flash then who died on cross and who died on cross was part of their beleif of Trinity then, if they say no then John 1.1 is not true. When these Christian say God become flash and god taken 2 nature, so which one in God and where it's mentioned? If we take these Christian argument so ask them Esa (A.S) Jesus pbuh telling about himself(I am verse( where Abraham a.s was on earth or when Abraham a.s was on paradise (spirit form) or not it this earth? Yes we are searching exact word because Esa A.S (Jesus pbuh) says there is one only true god that is father, so if you claim Esa a.s (jesus pbuh) was god you have to give/find this type of explicit, unambiguous, clear statement, (as tag fi rullah may allah forgive me for this blasphemy) Yeah water, steam and ice is same at same time, they are different yet same, father is not son and son is not father in their own bible yet they do not read it, they are contradicting themselves god is immortal yet god can die. Bible disapprove their claim that Esa (A.S) Jesus pbuh taken their sins yet bible state wickedness will be upon who did it, and goodness upon who did, wow this trinitarian lens they cannot take out and read Bible with open mind these Christian will learn about it better of Esa (A.S) Jesus pbuh message. You can see clearly these Christians tactics now be aggressive or be too much polite (covering the agression, two face people) and go to those Muslim people who are very polite to disturb them, intentionally be aggressive when nobody asked them to be, or these Christian go to those Muslim who give dawah (who are having a nice and civil conversation with people and these people are coming close to Islam,Allah the almighty, these Christian to there and disturb these conversation, create heavic, and create commotion so these people who are close to truth, Islam, Allah the almighty God away from truth, because of these Christian unnecessary intervention in these nice and civil dawah. May Allah guide these Christian and protect sincere people. That's why Islam is complete guidance, which consist all things which world needs or require. Not like these Christians beleif Christianity. Just remember may allah forgive me, in second coming of Esa a.s Jesus pbuh, if Esa a.s Jesus pbuh ask Christians why they beleif that Esa a.s Jesus pbuh is god, their is god head trinity father , son and holy spirit are one?, what they will say they will say they base their beleif in Bible, however if Jesus pbuh say their is nowhere mention of these which these Christians beleif so just remember what will happen to these Christian because in nowhere bible is mentioned that Esa a.s Jesus pbuh is god, their is god head Trinity father, son and holy spirit etc are one. Esa a.s Jesus pbuh will say why did you beliefs, what Paul taught, church and church father's taught, why you Christians did not beleifs what I (Esa a.s Jesus pbuh) clearly, explicitly, un- ambiguously told you, why did you beleif in your own beleif, Paul or church and church father told you to beleif which are not clear it's a mystery which cannot be clearly explained by the Bible or in the Bible which is not mentioned (trinity father, son and holy sprit are one), you taken implicit statements not explicit statements, you have taken ambiguous statements not un ambiguous statements why? Be prepared Christians and Christianity. One question, may allah forgive me, if these Christian beliefs that Esa a.s Jesus pbuh came and died and all sins taken upon himself Esa a.s Jesus pbuh, which also include Adam pbuh sin right, So why they beleif that Adam pbuh sin still exists within these Christian does that means Esa a.s Jesus pbuh did not taken that sin already which Esa a.s Jesus pbuh came and died for! According to these Christian beliefs! These Christian cannot answer without comparing to Quran and they cannot clearly explain their beleif of 3 in 1. Who died on cross for these Christian, Esa a.s Jesus pbuh or god, human body, word, sprit, soul who died? If human body died body was not part of trinity or Jesus pbuh! When in their own bible say God is immortal (god cannot die). When you tell them about their bible they always try to go Mary go around, bush around here and their, do not answer, move on different topic or just go to Quran why answer from your own bible first why they cannot answer? We do not have to proof that you guys have original Tora and injeel, you guys have to proof it's authentic real or not, it's opposite you guys have to proof that it's true that you have original Tora and injeel with clear evidence with facts, records. Especially Christians which they think they have original injeel because they do not have evidence they have accounts of people not word of god and they have teachings of church and people not the teachings of Allah (god) or Esa a.s Jesus pbuh, so you guys have to proof to us that you have original injeel not the people's account. These Christians has to clarify which Bible is original which Jesus pbuh has, NIV, King James, prodestian bible, orthodox bible, trinitarian, Unitarian, etc and who are these people who can take out and in the words of god and Esa a.s Jesus pbuh! Whoever (brother or sister) spreading the message of true and truth about Islam (Quran), believing in one God (not trinity or anything etc), beleif in the all prophets (pbu all of them) and believing in the last messenger Muhammed (s.a.w, pbuh), may allah (god) give all brother and sister who are spreading message of Islam (Quran), blessing, guidence, wisdom, patience, and long life here to spread message of Islam to all brothers and sisters. Ameen Just remember all faith especially Shias, Christians and Jews because we share much thing common. As for the Christian just ask yourself why suddenly god message change? Why! And as for Shias brother and sister read the Quran first and follow prophet Muhammad (s.a.w., pbuh) teachings ok as Allah (god) clearly said and told to follow the Quran and Muhammad (s.a.w., pbuh) teaching why you're following sahabas (teaching first then allah (Quran and Muhammad (s.a.w., pbuh) teachings) when allah clearly said and told what and whom to follow first. And also when allah clearly mentioned and told harming your body is not permissible why you do it! Where it's written in the Quran and where Mohammad (s.a.w., pbuh) told it do it! I am not very knowledgeable if you have answer to this from Quran and Muhammad (s.a.w., pbuh) then please guide me if I am wrong. My question is which scripture is consistent with one message (to follow one God), and which faith and believe have all earlier prophets (pbu all of them) in their scripture. Their is only one faith and believe which is consistent with earlier scripture and prophets (pbu all of them) i.e. Quran and Islam. We believe one God not trinity etc, and we believe in all prophets (pbu all of them). And most importantly the allah (god)clearly told and claimed that this is final mesage in the form of scripture (Quran) and Muhammad (s.a.w., pbuh) is the last prophet, their will be no more scripture and prophet, in Christianity and Jewish scripture do not clearly told or claimed by the allah (god) that this is final mesage, scripture and prophethood but only (Quran) ask yourself why it's only mentioned in Quran because allah (god) is clearly told and claimed it. Moreover the prophecies are coming true that Muhammad (s.a.w., pbuh) predicted and Muhammad (s.a.w., pbuh predicted about end times just remember we have very little time now as Muhammad (s.a.w., pbuh) predicted do not waste your this very low time, come to the truth which is very clearly and simply told by the allah (god) that is Islam (Quran) and the followings of Muhammad (s.a.w., pbuh) the last prophet. Submit to one and only worthy of worship allah (god), following the (Quran) and believing in the last prophet Muhammad (s.a.w., pbuh) (not worshipping any prophets (pbu all of them) but following their teaching) and following the teachings of the last prophet Muhammad (s.a.w., pbuh). As tag firullah May allah forgive me if anything thing I said is wrong, or goes against allah, Quran or our beloved prophet. May allah guide us all and protect us here and hereafter life. Ameen
May The Lord Jesus Christ God Almighty guide these brothers to open their eyes. The Bible says ye do error not knowing scripture. I pray they come to the truth
He can't even help himself, his prayer literally got rejected, he doesn't even know the hour nor what on the fig from far away, let alone answer your prayer. Bible is no more than a compilation of sheets paper authored by an anonymous author and where it also contains tons of contradictions, this is where you got your information regarding jesus from. Rubbish. You like it or not, nowhere Jesus ever EXPLICITLY testified himself as a God and teach about God manifest as three person and you can go on bring as many AMBIGUOUS verse as you want, the truth will remain explicit and clear, not ambiguous and mystery. Al Quran Al Maidah 109-120. 109 "˹Consider˺ the Day Allah will gather the messengers and say, “What response did you receive?” They will reply, “We have no knowledge ˹compared to You˺! You ˹alone˺ are indeed the Knower of all unseen.” 110 And ˹on Judgment Day˺ Allah will say, “O Jesus, son of Mary! Remember My favour upon you and your mother: how I supported you with the holy spirit so you spoke to people in ˹your˺ infancy and adulthood. How I taught you writing, wisdom, the Torah, and the Gospel. How you moulded a bird from clay-by My Will-and breathed into it and it became a ˹real˺ bird-by My Will. How you healed the blind and the lepers-by My Will. How you brought the dead to life-by My Will. How I prevented the Children of Israel from harming you when you came to them with clear proofs and the disbelievers among them said, “This is nothing but pure magic.” 111 And how I inspired the disciples, “Believe in Me and My messenger!” They declared, “We believe and bear witness that we fully submit ˹to Allah˺.” 112 ˹Remember˺ when the disciples asked, “O Jesus, son of Mary! Would your Lord be willing to send down to us a table spread with food from heaven?” Jesus answered, “Fear Allah if you are ˹truly˺ believers.” 113 They said, “We ˹only˺ wish to eat from it to reassure our hearts, to verify you are indeed truthful to us, and to become its witnesses.” 114 Jesus, son of Mary, prayed, “O Allah, our Lord! Send us from heaven a table spread with food as a feast for us-the first and last of us-and as a sign from You. Provide for us! You are indeed the Best Provider.” 115 Allah answered, “I am sending it down to you. But whoever among you denies afterwards will be subjected to a torment I have never inflicted on anyone of My creation.” 116 And ˹on Judgment Day˺ Allah will say, “O Jesus, son of Mary! Did you ever ask the people to worship you and your mother as gods besides Allah?” He will answer, “Glory be to You! How could I ever say what I had no right to say? If I had said such a thing, you would have certainly known it. You know what is ˹hidden˺ within me, but I do not know what is within You. Indeed, You ˹alone˺ are the Knower of all unseen. 117 I never told them anything except what You ordered me to say: “Worship Allah-my Lord and your Lord!” And I was witness over them as long as I remained among them. But when You took me, You were the Witness over them-and You are a Witness over all things. 118 If You punish them, they belong to You after all. But if You forgive them, You are surely the Almighty, All-Wise.” 119 Allah will declare, “This is the Day when ˹only˺ the faithful will benefit from their faithfulness. Theirs are Gardens under which rivers flow, to stay there for ever and ever. Allah is pleased with them and they are pleased with Him. That is the ultimate triumph.” 120 To Allah ˹alone˺ belongs the kingdom of the heavens and the earth and everything within. And He is Most Capable of everything."
💥 *Are Yahweh and El the same God?* - El was the head of an early Israelite pantheon, with Yahweh as its warrior‐god. Texts that mention both El and Yahweh but not as the same figure (Genesis 49; Numbers 23-24, discussed in the next section; Psalm 82) suggest an early accommodation of the two in some early form of Israelite polytheism.
💥 *What relationship do these false, pagan, gods have with one another?* El (a pagan god) is the father of many pagan gods including Baal- Hadad, Mot (god of death), Anat (daughter of El), Yam (god of the sea) and Yahweh. Under the Canaanite pantheon, El had 70 sons and a wife named Athirat (Asherah). Next to El in the pantheon hierarchy is Baal, who was also referred to as Adon which means lord/husband. Adonai used sometimes to refer to God of the Bible is derived from Adon. Baal was also known as god of fertility and storm, rain and drought, at times depicted as a BULL. EL and Baal were the traditional Canaanite father and son gods and were widely worshipped in Canaan dating back possibly to around 2000 BCE. The worship of El and Baal was prevalent in Canaan and the Phoenician cities, temples of worship were built for El and Baal all over the Levant.
Elah and Elohim means God/god, a term used to also address false gods. Allah/Aalah SWT Is The Proper Name of The Only True God that Jesus pbuh worshiped Alone! Yahweh is a pagan Canaanite deity! 💥 *EL, ASHERAH, BAAL, ADON, YAHWEH, MOLEK.* 💥 Dear Christians. When you read in your Scriptures (The New/Old Testament) and pass by the word Lord, LORD, El, Adonai, Yahweh, you actually invoke the names of pagan deities and gods. Even when a name such as God is used, it still means something WAY DIFFERENT to them than you might even think! 👉 *Psalm 82:1* *New International Version* A psalm of Asaph. God presides in the great assembly; he renders judgment among the "gods": *English Standard Version* God has taken his place in the divine council; in the midst of the gods he holds judgment: *NET Bible* A psalm of Asaph. God stands in the assembly of El; in the midst of the gods he renders judgment. 💥 *THE ACTUAL TRANSLATION* Elohim (the gods) has taken his place in the assembly of EL (pagan deity), in the midst of the elohim (the gods) He holds judgment. God אֱֽלֹהִ֗ים (’ĕlō·hîm) Noun - masculine plural Strong's Hebrew 430: gods -- the supreme God, magistrates, a superlative the gods: אֱלֹהִ֣ים (’ĕ·lō·hîm) Noun - masculine plural Strong's Hebrew 430: gods -- the supreme God, magistrates, a superlative 👉 *Psalm 29:1* *Holman Christian Standard Bible* A Davidic psalm. Ascribe to Yahweh, you heavenly beings, ascribe to the LORD glory and strength. *Douay-Rheims Bible* A psalm for David, at the finishing of the tabernacle. Bring to the Lord, O ye children of God (SONS OF EL): bring to the Lord the offspring of rams. *English Revised Version* A Psalm of David. Give unto the LORD, O ye sons of the mighty (SONS OF EL), give unto the LORD glory and strength. 💥 *ACTUAL TRANSLATION* Ascribe to Yahweh, O sons of EL, ascribe to Yahweh glory and strength. to the LORD, לַֽ֭יהוָה (Yah·weh) Preposition-l | Noun - proper - masculine singular Strong's Hebrew 3068: LORD -- the proper name of the God of Israel
👉 *Psalm 89:6* *New International Version* For who in the skies above can compare with the LORD? Who is like the LORD among the heavenly beings? *Literal Standard Version* For who in the sky, compares himself to YHWH? [Who] is like to YHWH among sons of the mighty? *Smith's Literal Translation* For who in the cloud shall be compared to Jehovah? shall he be likened to Jehovah among the sons of God? *Douay-Rheims Bible* For who in the clouds can be compared to the Lord: or who among the sons of God shall be like to God? *Brenton Septuagint Translation* For who in the heavens shall be compared to the Lord? and who shall be likened to the Lord among the sons of God? 💥 *ACTUAL TRANSLATION* For who in the skies can be compared to Yahweh, who among the sons of EL is like Yahweh,
💥 Dear Christians! Do you know that Baal is the brother of Yahweh? And do you know that the Core Essence of Baal worship is a pagan Human Sacrifice? *Early Iron Age (1200-1000 BCE)* - For example, the Israelite religion consisted of Canaanite gods such as El, the ruler of the pantheon, Asherah, his consort, and Baal. Yahweh is described as one of the sons of El in Deuteronomy 32:8-9, but this was removed by a later emendation to the text. 👉 *Deuteronomy 32:8-9* 8 When the Most High gave the nations their inheritance, when he divided all mankind, he set up boundaries for the peoples according to the number of the sons of Israel. 9 For the Lord’s portion is his people, Jacob his allotted inheritance.
💥 Did Abraham know the name "Yahweh" or he didn't know it? In Genesis, we find "the angel of Yahweh" appearing to Abraham, then Abraham named the place "Yahweh Will Provide", yet that same "Yahweh" appeared to Moses, in Exodus, and informed him that Abraham didn't know "Yahweh" by the name of "Yahweh"! How did Abraham name the place "Yahweh Will Provide" if he didn't know the name "Yahweh"? 👉 *Genesis 22:11-14* *The angel of Yahweh* called to him out of the sky, and said, "Abraham, Abraham!" He said, "Here I am." He said, "Don't lay your hand on the boy, neither do anything to him. For now I know that you fear God, since you have not withheld your son, your only son, from me." Abraham lifted up his eyes, and looked, and saw that behind him was a ram caught in the thicket by his horns. Abraham went and took the ram, and offered him up for a burnt offering instead of his son. *Abraham called the name of that place Yahweh Will Provide.* As it is said to this day, *"On Yahweh's mountain, it will be provided."* 👉 *Exodus 6:2-3* God spoke to Moses, and said to him, *"I am Yahweh; and I appeared to Abraham,* to Isaac, and to Jacob, as God Almighty; *BUT BY MY NAME YAHWEH I WAS NOT KNOWN TO THEM.*
💥 Did Abraham know the name "Lord" or he didn't know it? In Genesis, we find "the angel of the Lord" appearing to Abraham, then Abraham named the place "The Lord Will Provide", yet that same "Lord" appeared to Moses, in Exodus, and informed him that Abraham didn't know "Lord" by the name of "Lord"! How did Abraham name the place "The Lord Will Provide" if he didn't know the name "Lord"? 👉 *Genesis 22:11-14* (New King James Version) 11 But *the Angel of the Lord* called to him from heaven and said, “Abraham, Abraham!” So he said, “Here I am.” 12 And He said, “Do not lay your hand on the lad, or do anything to him; for now I know that you fear God, since you have not withheld your son, your only son, from Me.” 13 Then Abraham lifted his eyes and looked, and there behind him was a ram caught in a thicket by its horns. So Abraham went and took the ram, and offered it up for a burnt offering instead of his son. 14 *And Abraham called the name of the place, The-Lord-Will-Provide;* as it is said to this day, “In the Mount of the Lord it shall be provided.” 👉 *Exodus 6:2-3* (New King James Version) 2 And God spoke to Moses and said to him: *“I am the Lord. 3 I appeared to Abraham,* to Isaac, and to Jacob, as God Almighty, *but by My name Lord I was not known to them.*
💥 Did Abraham know the name of "Jehovah" or he didn't know it? In Genesis, we find "the angel of Jehovah" appearing to Abraham, then Abraham named the place "Jehovah Will Provide", yet that same "Jehovah" appeared to Moses, in Exodus, and informed him that Abraham didn't know "Jehovah" by the name of "Jehovah"! How did Abraham name the place "Jehovah Will Provide" if he didn't know the name of "Jehovah"? 👉 *Genesis 22:11-14* (American Standard Version - ASV) 11 And *the angel of Jehovah* called unto him out of heaven, and said, Abraham, Abraham: and he said, Here am I. 12 And he said, Lay not thy hand upon the lad, neither do thou anything unto him; for now I know that thou fearest God, seeing thou hast not withheld thy son, thine only son, from me. 13 And Abraham lifted up his eyes, and looked, and, behold, behind him a ram caught in the thicket by his horns: and Abraham went and took the ram, and offered him up for a burnt-offering in the stead of his son. 14 *And Abraham called the name of that place Jehovah-jireh:* as it is said to this day, *In the mount of Jehovah it shall be provided.* 👉 *Exodus 6:2-3* (American Standard Version - ASV) And God spake unto Moses, and said unto him, *I am Jehovah: 3 and I appeared unto Abraham,* unto Isaac, and unto Jacob, as God Almighty; *but by my name Jehovah I was not known to them.*
UA-cam Shadow Banning again Please share, like and comment to break the Algorithm
Tell us, where you’re watching from?
Brothers and Sisters! Please Like, Comment and Share the video to help us reach more people so you can share in the reward in sha Allah!
*SUPPORT DAWAHWISE*
❤www.patreon.com/dawahwise
❤gofund.me/dba0c96f
❤www.paypal.me/dawahwise
❤Join DawahWise Membership:
ua-cam.com/users/DawahWisejoin
Dorset, England.
Lahore, Pakistan
Watching from Philippines 🇵🇭 mindanao Alhamdulillah
Canada. UA-cam is hitting me as well. Will defenetly take revenge
@@DawahWise
Currently, in Malaysia
I give salam from the people of Bangladesh 🇧🇩❤️
His eye is not blind but his heart
Brother Hashim back ☝🏽🇵🇸💪
He's an Indian
ماشاءاللہ
Hashim does not even need to disturb the Quran; just the bible is enough to refute this christian
Thanks ALLAH for Islam
I don't have any words to express how blessed I am. Alhamdullilah
The debate ended with the christian leaving utterly devastated; all his trinitarian beliefs wrapped up and ready for disposal...
everythin they depend on was made up
the fa.Yke comission matt 28.19 isnt found in any manuscript befire the 3rd century.
Not only did they add in that " paulanity was now to be spread to the world" they later, had to add in the trinity to this already added command
Edmund Schlink, The Doctrine of Baptism, page 28:
“The baptismal command in its Matthew 28:19 form can not be the historical origin of Christian baptism. At the very least, it must be assumed that the text has been transmitted in a form expanded by the [Catholic] church..,,..,.
The Catholic Encyclopedia, II, page 263:
“The baptismal formula was changed from the name of Jesus Christ to the words Father, Son, and Holy Spirit by the Catholic Church in the second century.”
The Tyndale New Testament Commentaries, I, 275:
“It is often affirmed that the words in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost are not the ipsissima verba [exact words] of Jesus, but…a later liturgical addition.”,
wake up! they had to add the trinity later
Many Christians use this verse to prove the existence of the Trinity. For there are three that bear witness in heaven: the Father, the Word, and the Holy Spirit; and these three are one. (1 John 5:7) The issue with this verse is that it is universally recognized by Biblical scholars and historians, including thirty-two Christian scholars of the highest eminence backed by fifty cooperating Christian denominations, as being inserted by the Church later. Since it was proven that this verse is a fabrication, it has been deleted from some of the later Bibles, such as the Revised Standard Version and the New Revised Standard Version...,,.,
Bruce Metzger, the premier New Testament textual critic, writes:
“Matthew and Luke suppress or weaken references in Mark to such human emotions of Jesus as grief and anger and amazement as well as Jesus’ unrequited love; they also omit Mark’s statement that Jesus’ friends thought he was beside himself”.
He explains further, that:
“The later gospels omit what might imply that Jesus was unable to accomplish what he willed…and also omit questions asked by Jesus which might be taken to imply his ignorance.”[3]
Metzger continues further by enumerating instances where Matthew and Luke soften Mark’s statements which might minimize the majesty of Jesus and replaced it with illustrations of a more alluring and authoritative Jesus.
In the story of the fig tree as found in Mark, the disciples did not notice the withering of the tree until next morning. For Matthew, this seemed less dramatic and unimpressive, and hence in his narrative the tree withered at once, leaving the disciples in shock and amazement.
Matthew and Luke were adamant in changing the words of Jesus. They wanted to make Jesus say what they wanted people to believe, “reflecting a later stage of theological understanding than that in Mark.” (Metzger, pg 83)
It seems quite clear that during both the pre and post gospel stages of the gospel traditions transmission, the available material was molded, filtered and changed in direct correlation to the Christological convictions of those who handled the traditions.
It is important to stress that this is not a case of the evangelists’ mere differing in emphasis; rather there are numerous occasions when the later gospel writers go out of their way to modify and alter the earlier version.
Therefore, if we wish to come close to the historical Jesus in the gospels, it is a good starting point to compare the stories in the various gospels, to discern where the story has altered.
Masha Allah Hashim, you completely ripped the guy to pieces!
Masha' Allah. Hashim & Mansur - the unbeatable duo.
Great confidence by hashim, brother.
The definition of crashing a party and taking over the festivities!
Allhumdullah for the Grace of Islam
Brother Hashim without his trademark cap if I can call it that looks like a totally different person.
May Allah the Almighty bless him and his family members, ameen.
Brother Hashim,
Mashallah may Allah protect him!!
Bro Hashim Terbaikkkk... Penjelasan yg mantap....
Alhamdulillah for Islam! Amazing Brother Hashim! May Allah continue to bless and help you. JazakAllah Khairan!
Brother hashim hit the nail on the head
Alhamdulillahi blessings of Islam
بارك الله الأخ هاشم أحب طريقته في الدعوة شخص متمكن ودارس جيد لكتاب النصارى وملم به و بنصوصه المحرفة وتفسيرات العلماء النصارى و يحاجهم بكتابهم وتفسيرات علمائهم بطريقة سهلة وواضحة وبثبات وثقة زاده الله تمكناً وجعله الله سبباً أن يهدي الله على يديه الضلال من العباد آمين
جزاكم الله خيرا 🇲🇦المغرب
God bless you bro hashim.
People ask what series do i watch on my free time, i said i watch dawahwise. May Allah bless Hashim and Mansur for their dawah
Superbly debated by Brother Hashim!
Good to see how the Unitarians are respectfully listening to the conversation.
12:46 " Join the queue you're next" 😂😂😂
He said I am not joining the queu
😂😂😂😂 hashim is their destroyer of happiness and belief.
@@abzinho10karim25 and their god hhh
At the end the penny dropped...
Thank God it actually does at times, as the denial is deep and the brainwashing scary!
God forbid I ever fall for Christianity.
Islam is the one and only true relligion anyone who denies that is lost
This Christian man tries to run away the truth!!
Masha'Allah
Hashim our hero. MashaAllah
Allahou Akbar thanks to brother Hashim
Islam ☪️ = professor
Christine= patient please learn about the truth
May Allah SWT bless the DawahWise team Ameen ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
Alhumdulilah
That was a decent conversation and well done brother hashim.
brother hashim nailed it!
Allahhumma barik
Brother Hashim... I love how you expose these Christians. I wonder which country are you coming from
How easy christian pagan gets triggered...
Thank you
My Christian brother from Sowerby bridge, Halifax
Hashim you washed and rinsed the poor guy 😅
Excellent
May Allah guide this Humble Giant ❤ to the true Path of Islam . Ameen
Subhanallah,first time seeing Hashim without hat :)
Hashim is really a slayer. Mashallah
👉 *2 Samuel **7:22*
*How great You are, O Lord GOD! For there is none like You, and there is no God but You,* according to everything we have heard with our own ears.
👉 *Exodus 9:14*
Otherwise, I will send all My plagues against you and your officials and your people, *so you may know that there is no one like Me in all the earth.*
👉 *Isaiah 40:18*
To whom then will ye liken God? or what likeness will ye compare unto him?
the fa.Yke comission matt 28.19 isnt found in any manuscript befire the 3rd century.
Not only did they add in that " paulanity was now to be spread to the world" they later, had to add in the trinity to this already added command
Edmund Schlink, The Doctrine of Baptism, page 28:
“The baptismal command in its Matthew 28:19 form can not be the historical origin of Christian baptism. At the very least, it must be assumed that the text has been transmitted in a form expanded by the [Catholic] church..,,..,.
The Catholic Encyclopedia, II, page 263:
“The baptismal formula was changed from the name of Jesus Christ to the words Father, Son, and Holy Spirit by the Catholic Church in the second century.”
The Tyndale New Testament Commentaries, I, 275:
“It is often affirmed that the words in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost are not the ipsissima verba [exact words] of Jesus, but…a later liturgical addition.”,
wake up! they had to add the trinity later
Many Christians use this verse to prove the existence of the Trinity. For there are three that bear witness in heaven: the Father, the Word, and the Holy Spirit; and these three are one. (1 John 5:7) The issue with this verse is that it is universally recognized by Biblical scholars and historians, including thirty-two Christian scholars of the highest eminence backed by fifty cooperating Christian denominations, as being inserted by the Church later. Since it was proven that this verse is a fabrication, it has been deleted from some of the later Bibles, such as the Revised Standard Version and the New Revised Standard Version...,,.,
Bruce Metzger, the premier New Testament textual critic, writes:
“Matthew and Luke suppress or weaken references in Mark to such human emotions of Jesus as grief and anger and amazement as well as Jesus’ unrequited love; they also omit Mark’s statement that Jesus’ friends thought he was beside himself”.
He explains further, that:
“The later gospels omit what might imply that Jesus was unable to accomplish what he willed…and also omit questions asked by Jesus which might be taken to imply his ignorance.”[3]
Metzger continues further by enumerating instances where Matthew and Luke soften Mark’s statements which might minimize the majesty of Jesus and replaced it with illustrations of a more alluring and authoritative Jesus.
In the story of the fig tree as found in Mark, the disciples did not notice the withering of the tree until next morning. For Matthew, this seemed less dramatic and unimpressive, and hence in his narrative the tree withered at once, leaving the disciples in shock and amazement.
Matthew and Luke were adamant in changing the words of Jesus. They wanted to make Jesus say what they wanted people to believe, “reflecting a later stage of theological understanding than that in Mark.” (Metzger, pg 83)
It seems quite clear that during both the pre and post gospel stages of the gospel traditions transmission, the available material was molded, filtered and changed in direct correlation to the Christological convictions of those who handled the traditions.
It is important to stress that this is not a case of the evangelists’ mere differing in emphasis; rather there are numerous occasions when the later gospel writers go out of their way to modify and alter the earlier version.
Therefore, if we wish to come close to the historical Jesus in the gospels, it is a good starting point to compare the stories in the various gospels, to discern where the story has altered.
GROSS: So Jesus saw himself as the messiah. What else did that mean in its time?
EHRMAN: Well, a lot of Christians today have a wrong idea about what the messiah was supposed to be. The word messiah is a Hebrew word that literally means the anointed one. This was used in reference to the kings of Israel. The ancient kings of Israel, when they became king during the coronation ceremony, would have oil poured on their head as a sign of divine favor.
And so the king of Israel was called God's anointed one, the messiah. There came a point at which there was no longer a king ruling Israel, and some Jewish thinkers began to maintain that there would be a future king of Israel, a future anointed one, and they called that one the messiah. And so the messiah for most Jews simply referred to the future king of Israel.
And so when Jesus told his disciples that he himself was the messiah, he was saying that in the future, when God establishes the kingdom once more, I myself will be the king of that kingdom. And so it's not that the messiah was supposed to be God. The messiah was not supposed to be God. The messiah was a human being
So did Jesus' earliest followers consider him to be God?
EHRMAN: Well, what I argue in the book is that during his lifetime, Jesus himself didn't call himself God and didn't consider himself God and that none of his disciples had any inkling at all that he was God. The way it works is that you do find Jesus calling himself God in the Gospel of John, our last Gospel. Jesus says things like: Before Abraham was, I am, and I and the father are one, and if you've seen me, you've see the father.
These are all statements that you find only in the Gospel of John, and that's striking because we have earlier Gospels, and we have the writings of Paul, and in none of them is there any indication that Jesus said such things about him. I think it's completely implausible that Matthew, Mark and Luke would not mention that Jesus called himself God if that's what he was declaring about himself. That would be a rather important point to make.
So this is not an unusual view among scholars. It's simply the view that the Gospel of John is providing a theological understand of Jesus that is not what was historically accurate.
GROSS: Jesus was referred to as the king of the Jews. Did he call himself that, and what did that mean it is time? Do we know? Can we have any idea what that meant in its time?
EHRMAN: Yeah, we do know, and actually to be a king of the Jews simply meant literally, being the king over Israel. It is a very difficult question to get to, what Jesus taught about himself because of the nature of our gospels, but one thing is relatively certain, that that the reason the Romans crucified Jesus was precisely because he was calling himself the king of Israel.
Now, Jesus obviously was not the king. So what might he have meant by it? Well, what scholars have long thought is that Jesus was talking about not being put on the throne by means of some kind of political show of power, but that Jesus thought the world as he knew it was coming to an end and God was going to bring in a kingdom, a new kingdom in which there would be no more injustice or oppression or poverty or suffering of any kind.
And in this kingdom, Jesus appears to have thought that he himself would be the future king. And so Jesus meant this not in the regular political sense but in a kind of apocalyptic sense, that at the end of the age, this is what was going to happen: he was going to be installed as king.
A prophet is someone SENT by God, God is not a prophet by definition, they are mutually exclusive.
If this man was GOD, he would never have claimed to be a prophet or called a prophet by those who saw him.
Matthew 21:11
And the crowds were saying, “This is the prophet Jesus, from Nazareth in Galilee.”
Luke 7:16
Fear gripped them all, and they began glorifying God, saying, “A great prophet has arisen among us!”
John 4:19
The woman *said to Him, “Sir, I perceive that You are a prophet.
Matthew 21:46
When they sought to seize Him, they feared the people, because they considered Him to be a prophet.
John 6:14
Therefore when the people saw the sign which He had performed, they said, “This is truly the Prophet who is to come into the world.”
John 7:40
Some of the people therefore, when they heard these words, were saying, “This certainly is the Prophet.”
John 9:17
So they *said to the blind man again, “What do you say about Him, since He opened your eyes?” And he said, “He is a prophet.”
Luke 24:19
And He said to them, “What things?” And they said to Him, “The things about Jesus the Nazarene, who was a prophet mighty in deed and word in the sight of God and all the people,
Mark 6:15
But others were saying, “He is Elijah.” And others were saying, “He is a prophet, like one of the prophets of old.”
Mark 8:28
They told Him, saying, “John the Baptist; and others say Elijah; but others, one of the prophets.”
Luke 9:8
and by some that Elijah had appeared, and by others that one of the prophets of old had risen again.
OK, so Jesus doesnt refute anybody calling him a Prophet, he reaffirms it😇
Luke 13:33 . . . . I must proceed on my way. For it wouldn’t do for a prophet of God to be kwil. Led except in Jerusalem.
Mark 6:3-4 Then they scoffed . . . . They were deeply off. nded and refused to believe in him. Then Jesus told them, “A prophet is honored everywhere except in his own hometown and among his relatives and his own family”.
In the above two verses, Jesus called himself a prophet. There are also many verses indicating that during his lifetime on earth the people in Judea and Galilee regarded him as a prophet.
Regarding the verses in which Jesus says that he is equal to God (mainly in the Gospel of John) most scholars believe that Jesus never said that. It was what people started saying about him after his deaff and put on his lips in the Gospels written at least 4 decades later.,
Mashallah
Well done 👏
Belief in God is the pillar of any religion. Whatever religion we are the main pillar is belief in God.
Jesus didn't ask you to call God father, Greeks who translated the bible ask you to do so. Jesus spoke Aramiac, and thus he used the word Allah
From 🇧🇩
W Bro Hashim 🗿🔥
Allah is the greatest 🤲🏼🇵🇸❤️
💥 The original term in the Torah and Injeel is "Rabb, which means Lord/Master/Sustainer" not "Abb, which means Father". Surat Al-Fatiha in The Noble Qur'an starts with "Alhamdolellahy Rab Al'aalameen" not "Abb Al'aalameen".
👉 *Chapter 1 The Opening سورة الفاتحة - Al-Fatiha: Verse 2*
الْحَمْدُ لِلَّهِ رَبِّ الْعَالَمِينَ
Praise be to Allah, the Cherisher and Sustainer of the worlds;
☝🏽☝🏽☝🏽☝🏽☝🏽❤️❤️❤️
Christians! Please avoid Hashim, and do not challenge to debate the Bible. His good knowledge will show no mercy and you will probably get angry and start shouting and insulting.
Quran 4:109 Here you are - those who argue on their behalf in [this] worldly life - but who will argue with Allah for them on the Day of Resurrection, or who will [then] be their representative?
My favourite bro
Ask them to read Ezekiel.First 6 pages.
Hebrew is very easy to learn.
Just 900 words.
Assalamualaikum hashim brothers iconic cap is missing here
Make a dawah towards al aqsa masjid and also need to know what we learn about the blessed people of Palestinians may Allah reward them the highest jannah insha Allah
WOW, Hashim exposed and destroyed this preacher, . To Hashim👍👍👍👍🤣
Bro hashim direct..and spot on..tdk bertele 2
We love you brother Hashim! MashAllah! May Allah swt increase you and your family ameeen. 💪🏽✌🏽
unitarians watching hashim be like: WRITE THAT DOWN! WRITE THAT DOWN!
There is the King's James version and the New Kings one.
Watched several of hashims videos this guy always wants to be right
Wants to be right with facts and
NOT wants to be right without facts
He has an extensive amount of information, ranges a lot. I remember him actually is (not was but is) someone who is proficient in bible studies. Or I mixed up with another brother... But he has so many facts to backed it up. He never want to be right. he was correcting what was wrong. The reason you kept seeing him win is only because the opponent couldn't refute anymore when they were trapped in the corner by their own book
Which guy, the trinitarian or Hashim?
When you have no idea or fact you claimed to be victim.Use your brain and analyse. Dont be ignorant
Sharp
The term father is not exclusive to Jesus.
John 20:17 the Lord Jesus after His resurrection tells Mary Magdalene to go to His brethren and say to them, “I ascend unto My Father, and your Father; and to My God, and your God.” The majesty of these words is almost beyond our understanding.
Muslim wins hands down 😅
Jesus is worshiped after he ascended to heaven by the apostles
Luke 24:50-53 The Ascension of Jesus
50 When he had led them out to the vicinity of Bethany, he lifted up his hands and blessed them. 51 While he was blessing them, he left them and was taken up into heaven. 52 THEN THEY WORSHIPED HIM AND RETURNED TO JERUSALEM WITH GREAT JOY AND THEY STAYED CONTINUALLY AT THE TEMPLE , PRAISING GOD.
The worship of gods in Greek is generally expressed by other words than the one translated `worship' in the New Testament. The Greek word translated `worship' in the New Testament seems to emphasize the bodily position of prostration involved in worship. As such it differs from the general usage of the Greek word, which implies giving honor by kissing or bowing to kiss the hand or even foot. This kind of worship in Greek generally was not for God or gods, but for people in high position from whom petitions are made. The worship of gods in Greek is generally expressed by other words. Most of the texts in the New Testament either refer clearly to worship of God or are somewhat ambiguous acts of homage. Some texts show clearly that the word does not imply divinity. Such an example is in Matthew 9:18. `While he speaks these things unto them, behold, there came a certain ruler, and worshipped him, saying, My daughter is even now dead...' This abject homage of the ruler was certainly not the worship of Jesus as God. Dictionaries of New Testament Greek made even by Trinitarian scholars recognize this variety in the usage of the word. Even Matthew 2:2,8,11; 20:20; Luke 4:7; 24:52 are considered by Harper and Row's Analytical Greek Lexicon to be examples of the word in which it does not imply divinity. The line between the two meanings will therefore often be determined by the faith of the reader, and as such cannot be construed as proof of the deity of Jesus.
❤
GOD appeared to Abraham at the Oaks of Mamre while he was sitting at the entrance of his tent. It was the hottest part of the day. He looked up and saw three men standing. He ran from his tent to greet them and bowed before them. He said, “Master, if it please you, stop for a while with your servant. I’ll get some water so you can wash your feet. Rest under this tree. I’ll get some food to refresh you on your way, since your travels have brought you across my path.” They said, “Certainly. Go ahead.” Abraham hurried into the tent to Sarah. He said, “Hurry. Get three cups of our best flour; knead it and make bread.” Then Abraham ran to the cattle pen and picked out a nice plump calf and gave it to the servant who lost no time getting it ready. Then he got curds and milk, brought them with the calf that had been roasted, set the meal before the men, and stood there under the tree while they ate.
It's impossible that Hazrat Isa Alaihessalam ever called Allah "Father". It's impossible for a prophet to make such a mistake, and it's certainly impossible that Allah would ever allow a prophet to make such a ginormous mistake. To acknowledge that he ever did so is pure evil. Any book, including any bible, that states he referred to Allah as "Father" shows the extent to which those books have been perverted, corrupted, manipulated. The Muslim man here needs to wise up to this fact. Any book or historical record that refers to, or implies, Allah as being "Father" is the work of the devil and evil people.
Back in the time of Isa a.s. it is quite possible.
They took the term Father to be literally a Father of Isa a.s., just the way they take so many things out of context.
Therefore the Quran was revealed, to correct the mistakes.
Its very fast paced,,,l pity the trinitarian,,,hashim made him breathless 🤣
as a somali i could see where the greeks or hebrews maybe got confused with the word " father ". we have arabic words , hebrew words, aramic words , heck even ancient egyptian words in our language. we have this words that we use for god sometimes. its " ebbe " and never " abba " becouse abba means littery father. but ebbe is reserved for allah only. we use many words for god. wr say ilah, ilahey ' allah" , and also " ebbe ( spelled eebeh sometimes ) " .. am sure this same words propaply used to exists in atamic aswell. becouse just like hebrews we also sat abba or abbo to mean father. i would not be suprised that aramic also had abba and aswll ebbe.. ebbe meaning god and abba meaning father. am sure the greeks just messed it up. we somalis have many words from othrr languages around the world. if yoy want ancient words then undetstand somali words. it comes in handy especialy with ancient egyptian words. bisad means cat for example in ancient egyotians. somali is the only language that uses the same word and many words of ancient civilizations. aramic the same. am pretty sure the word ebbe ( god ) entered the somalia language through the aramaic language aswell the word abba (father ) its ebbe/ebbee (god ) and not abba (father ) , the hebrews and greeks messed it up 😂😂😂.
the difference between ancient egyptians and the aramic is the ancient egyptians left many words behind on walls. and it has many words in common with somali language, dont ask me how. if we could find only all the words that aramics used for god through the years would have been great. am sure ebbe ( or eebeh) or spelled different will be there
Hamzah, Muslims must also believe and follow the Bible as long as it does not contradict the Quran. And, believe and follow the Bible that its followers believe and follow the Bible. That is the essence of the command to believe in those books.
WOW, Hashim exposed and destroyed this preacher, and when cornered and have no answers, it’s time to Run Run Run 🏃♂️🏃♂️🏃♂️. To Hashim👍👍👍👍🤣
👉 *Jeremiah 8:8*
8 *“‘How can you say, “We are wise,*
*for we have the law of the LORD,”*
*when actually the lying pen of the scribes*
*has handled it falsely?*
👉 *Jeremiah 23:36*
36 But you must not mention ‘a message from the LORD’ again, because each one’s word becomes their own message. *So you distort the words of the living God,* the LORD Almighty, our God.
He should learn the medieval English language.
lol If I ask a Christian about John 17:3 & they respond with a question is Allah a father? .
Simple are you going to ask a Unitarian or a johova witness is Allah a father if they brought up the same verse
Gospel of john clearly do not teach about allah.
The whole gospel teach Father Son and holy spirit as God.
I mean same gospel of John jesus said everything father does he do the same. John start his gospel by pointing jesus as creator of everything.
@enockt6218 Actually in the Arabic bible john 17.3 does say Allah. But it doesnt say Father, son and the holy spirit in any language.
@@abutalsafuba2179
Just a translation. In Swedish Bible it says Gud. Its just a title.
In Aramaic, Greek, Hebrew it says Father.
Jesus said Father 165 times in Bible so its very clear is not allah.
First of all, jesus wasn't hes name.
End of discussion.
Muslim's point of view is crystal clear ☝️
christians need to talk to hashim before taking their beliefs any further !
a simple question to ask questions when they bring up john 1 is to ask them where did Jesus say this?
John is a human and we know by definition, humans are sinners. This is what they believe. John, needs Jesus' innocent blood to be forgiven too and is prone to the same stuff as the rest. He might have made up this passage. When and where did Jesus tell him this?
this is the fundamental difference between many other religions and Islam.
if someone tells me the sahaba said X. often, we have something where we find the Prophet muhammad says ABCDE....we look for it in hadith. we are given context. we see from where and how this came up. was it jut an opinion? was it from teh prophet? was it an exception? etc etc
with christianity, it's make things up as you go. eg: they take the forsaken quote of jesus on the cross and say it's about psalms 22 or whatever it is. but in order to make it fit their beliefs....you have to competely ignore the actual context of psalms 22. instead they will focus on a few trigger words like pierce and just use the it's foreshadowing excuse. so for centuries, people read psalms 22 and knew to read it in context but all of a sudden...the actual story doesn't matter. you ignore it all and then just take a verse or two and make it about jesus.
👉 *Isaiah 45:5*
*I am the LORD, and there is no other; apart from me there is no God.* I will strengthen you, though you have not acknowledged me,
👉 *Exodus 9:14*
Otherwise, I will send all My plagues against you and your officials and your people, *so you may know that there is no one like Me in all the earth.*
👉 *Deuteronomy 4:35*
You were shown these things *so that you would know that the LORD is God; there is no other besides Him.*
👉 *Deuteronomy 32:39*
*See now that I am He; there is no God besides Me.* I bring death and I give life; I wound and I heal, *and there is no one who can deliver from My hand.*
👉 *Psalm 18:31*
*For who is God besides the LORD?* And who is the Rock except our God?
👉 *Isaiah 43:10*
"You are My witnesses," declares the LORD, "and My servant whom I have chosen, *so that you may consider and believe Me and understand that I am He. Before Me no god was formed, and after Me none will come.*
👉 *Isaiah 44:8*
Fear ye not, neither be afraid: have not I told thee from that time, and have declared it? ye are even my witnesses. *Is there a God beside me? yea, there is no God; I know not any.*
👉 *Isaiah 46:9*
Remember the former things of old: *for I am God, and there is none else; I am God, and there is none like me,*
The God is the God of Jesus Christ here
Cooked him like kebab 😭😅
When God said to Moses pbuh I am who I am now go forth and do what I told you to do the Pagans start jumping up and down clapping and shouting we’ve cracked it his name is I AM 🤦🏽
Poor Christians always get CORNERED in speakers CORNER 😂
I am is just a english translation YHWH but the name is a title. God of bible name is a title.
@@enockt6218 I am translated is Asher Aygo Amee not YHWY!!!!
@@enockt6218 Why do you lie????
@@enockt6218 Is this what your god told you to do? Waffle with Bs???? Smh
@@enockt6218 There is NO Yhwy in your New Pagan Covenant Testament and waffling with Bs acting as if you have a clue will not help you!!!!
👉 *Isaiah 45:14,18*
14 *This is what the Lord says:*
“The products of Egypt and the merchandise of Cush,
and those tall Sabeans-
they will come over to you
and will be yours;
they will trudge behind you,
coming over to you in chains.
They will bow down before you
and plead with you, saying,
*‘Surely God is with you, and there is no other;*
*there is no other god.’”*
18 For this is what the Lord says-
he who created the heavens,
he is God;
he who fashioned and made the earth,
he founded it;
he did not create it to be empty,
but formed it to be inhabited-
he says:
*“I am the Lord,*
*and there is no other.*
👉 *Isaiah 45:20-21*
20 “Gather together and come;
assemble, you fugitives from the nations.
*Ignorant are those who carry about idols of wood,*
*who pray to gods that cannot save.*
21 Declare what is to be, present it-
let them take counsel together.
Who foretold this long ago,
who declared it from the distant past?
*Was it not I, the Lord?*
*And there is no God apart from me,*
*a righteous God and a Savior;*
*there is none but me.*
These Christian contradict themselves with John 1.1 god become flash right then they are saying according to their beleif who died on cross was god really blasphemy when god does not die its in their scripture (may allah forgive me for this saying blasphemy), dawah brothers should ask if god become flash then who died on cross and who died on cross was part of their beleif of Trinity then, if they say no then John 1.1 is not true.
When these Christian say God become flash and god taken 2 nature, so which one in God and where it's mentioned?
If we take these Christian argument so ask them Esa (A.S) Jesus pbuh telling about himself(I am verse( where Abraham a.s was on earth or when Abraham a.s was on paradise (spirit form) or not it this earth?
Yes we are searching exact word because Esa A.S (Jesus pbuh) says there is one only true god that is father, so if you claim Esa a.s (jesus pbuh) was god you have to give/find this type of explicit, unambiguous, clear statement, (as tag fi rullah may allah forgive me for this blasphemy)
Yeah water, steam and ice is same at same time, they are different yet same, father is not son and son is not father in their own bible yet they do not read it, they are contradicting themselves god is immortal yet god can die. Bible disapprove their claim that Esa (A.S) Jesus pbuh taken their sins yet bible state wickedness will be upon who did it, and goodness upon who did, wow this trinitarian lens they cannot take out and read Bible with open mind these Christian will learn about it better of Esa (A.S) Jesus pbuh message.
You can see clearly these Christians tactics now be aggressive or be too much polite (covering the agression, two face people) and go to those Muslim people who are very polite to disturb them, intentionally be aggressive when nobody asked them to be, or these Christian go to those Muslim who give dawah (who are having a nice and civil conversation with people and these people are coming close to Islam,Allah the almighty, these Christian to there and disturb these conversation, create heavic, and create commotion so these people who are close to truth, Islam, Allah the almighty God away from truth, because of these Christian unnecessary intervention in these nice and civil dawah. May Allah guide these Christian and protect sincere people.
That's why Islam is complete guidance, which consist all things which world needs or require. Not like these Christians beleif Christianity.
Just remember may allah forgive me, in second coming of Esa a.s Jesus pbuh, if Esa a.s Jesus pbuh ask Christians why they beleif that Esa a.s Jesus pbuh is god, their is god head trinity father , son and holy spirit are one?, what they will say they will say they base their beleif in Bible, however if Jesus pbuh say their is nowhere mention of these which these Christians beleif so just remember what will happen to these Christian because in nowhere bible is mentioned that Esa a.s Jesus pbuh is god, their is god head Trinity father, son and holy spirit etc are one. Esa a.s Jesus pbuh will say why did you beliefs, what Paul taught, church and church father's taught, why you Christians did not beleifs what I (Esa a.s Jesus pbuh) clearly, explicitly, un- ambiguously told you, why did you beleif in your own beleif, Paul or church and church father told you to beleif which are not clear it's a mystery which cannot be clearly explained by the Bible or in the Bible which is not mentioned (trinity father, son and holy sprit are one), you taken implicit statements not explicit statements, you have taken ambiguous statements not un ambiguous statements why? Be prepared Christians and Christianity.
One question, may allah forgive me, if these Christian beliefs that Esa a.s Jesus pbuh came and died and all sins taken upon himself Esa a.s Jesus pbuh, which also include Adam pbuh sin right, So why they beleif that Adam pbuh sin still exists within these Christian does that means Esa a.s Jesus pbuh did not taken that sin already which Esa a.s Jesus pbuh came and died for! According to these Christian beliefs!
These Christian cannot answer without comparing to Quran and they cannot clearly explain their beleif of 3 in 1.
Who died on cross for these Christian, Esa a.s Jesus pbuh or god, human body, word, sprit, soul who died? If human body died body was not part of trinity or Jesus pbuh! When in their own bible say God is immortal (god cannot die).
When you tell them about their bible they always try to go Mary go around, bush around here and their, do not answer, move on different topic or just go to Quran why answer from your own bible first why they cannot answer?
We do not have to proof that you guys have original Tora and injeel, you guys have to proof it's authentic real or not, it's opposite you guys have to proof that it's true that you have original Tora and injeel with clear evidence with facts, records. Especially Christians which they think they have original injeel because they do not have evidence they have accounts of people not word of god and they have teachings of church and people not the teachings of Allah (god) or Esa a.s Jesus pbuh, so you guys have to proof to us that you have original injeel not the people's account. These Christians has to clarify which Bible is original which Jesus pbuh has, NIV, King James, prodestian bible, orthodox bible, trinitarian, Unitarian, etc and who are these people who can take out and in the words of god and Esa a.s Jesus pbuh!
Whoever (brother or sister) spreading the message of true and truth about Islam (Quran), believing in one God (not trinity or anything etc), beleif in the all prophets (pbu all of them) and believing in the last messenger Muhammed (s.a.w, pbuh), may allah (god) give all brother and sister who are spreading message of Islam (Quran), blessing, guidence, wisdom, patience, and long life here to spread message of Islam to all brothers and sisters. Ameen
Just remember all faith especially Shias, Christians and Jews because we share much thing common.
As for the Christian just ask yourself why suddenly god message change? Why!
And as for Shias brother and sister read the Quran first and follow prophet Muhammad (s.a.w., pbuh) teachings ok as Allah (god) clearly said and told to follow the Quran and Muhammad (s.a.w., pbuh) teaching why you're following sahabas (teaching first then allah (Quran and Muhammad (s.a.w., pbuh) teachings) when allah clearly said and told what and whom to follow first. And also when allah clearly mentioned and told harming your body is not permissible why you do it! Where it's written in the Quran and where Mohammad (s.a.w., pbuh) told it do it! I am not very knowledgeable if you have answer to this from Quran and Muhammad (s.a.w., pbuh) then please guide me if I am wrong.
My question is which scripture is consistent with one message (to follow one God), and which faith and believe have all earlier prophets (pbu all of them) in their scripture.
Their is only one faith and believe which is consistent with earlier scripture and prophets (pbu all of them) i.e. Quran and Islam. We believe one God not trinity etc, and we believe in all prophets (pbu all of them). And most importantly the allah (god)clearly told and claimed that this is final mesage in the form of scripture (Quran) and Muhammad (s.a.w., pbuh) is the last prophet, their will be no more scripture and prophet, in Christianity and Jewish scripture do not clearly told or claimed by the allah (god) that this is final mesage, scripture and prophethood but only (Quran) ask yourself why it's only mentioned in Quran because allah (god) is clearly told and claimed it.
Moreover the prophecies are coming true that Muhammad (s.a.w., pbuh) predicted and Muhammad (s.a.w., pbuh predicted about end times just remember we have very little time now as Muhammad (s.a.w., pbuh) predicted do not waste your this very low time, come to the truth which is very clearly and simply told by the allah (god) that is Islam (Quran) and the followings of Muhammad (s.a.w., pbuh) the last prophet.
Submit to one and only worthy of worship allah (god), following the (Quran) and believing in the last prophet Muhammad (s.a.w., pbuh) (not worshipping any prophets (pbu all of them) but following their teaching) and following the teachings of the last prophet Muhammad (s.a.w., pbuh).
As tag firullah May allah forgive me if anything thing I said is wrong, or goes against allah, Quran or our beloved prophet.
May allah guide us all and protect us here and hereafter life. Ameen
May The Lord Jesus Christ God Almighty guide these brothers to open their eyes. The Bible says ye do error not knowing scripture. I pray they come to the truth
He can't even help himself, his prayer literally got rejected, he doesn't even know the hour nor what on the fig from far away, let alone answer your prayer. Bible is no more than a compilation of sheets paper authored by an anonymous author and where it also contains tons of contradictions, this is where you got your information regarding jesus from. Rubbish. You like it or not, nowhere Jesus ever EXPLICITLY testified himself as a God and teach about God manifest as three person and you can go on bring as many AMBIGUOUS verse as you want, the truth will remain explicit and clear, not ambiguous and mystery. Al Quran Al Maidah 109-120. 109 "˹Consider˺ the Day Allah will gather the messengers and say, “What response did you receive?” They will reply, “We have no knowledge ˹compared to You˺! You ˹alone˺ are indeed the Knower of all unseen.” 110 And ˹on Judgment Day˺ Allah will say, “O Jesus, son of Mary! Remember My favour upon you and your mother: how I supported you with the holy spirit so you spoke to people in ˹your˺ infancy and adulthood. How I taught you writing, wisdom, the Torah, and the Gospel. How you moulded a bird from clay-by My Will-and breathed into it and it became a ˹real˺ bird-by My Will. How you healed the blind and the lepers-by My Will. How you brought the dead to life-by My Will. How I prevented the Children of Israel from harming you when you came to them with clear proofs and the disbelievers among them said, “This is nothing but pure magic.” 111 And how I inspired the disciples, “Believe in Me and My messenger!” They declared, “We believe and bear witness that we fully submit ˹to Allah˺.” 112 ˹Remember˺ when the disciples asked, “O Jesus, son of Mary! Would your Lord be willing to send down to us a table spread with food from heaven?” Jesus answered, “Fear Allah if you are ˹truly˺ believers.” 113 They said, “We ˹only˺ wish to eat from it to reassure our hearts, to verify you are indeed truthful to us, and to become its witnesses.” 114 Jesus, son of Mary, prayed, “O Allah, our Lord! Send us from heaven a table spread with food as a feast for us-the first and last of us-and as a sign from You. Provide for us! You are indeed the Best Provider.” 115 Allah answered, “I am sending it down to you. But whoever among you denies afterwards will be subjected to a torment I have never inflicted on anyone of My creation.” 116 And ˹on Judgment Day˺ Allah will say, “O Jesus, son of Mary! Did you ever ask the people to worship you and your mother as gods besides Allah?” He will answer, “Glory be to You! How could I ever say what I had no right to say? If I had said such a thing, you would have certainly known it. You know what is ˹hidden˺ within me, but I do not know what is within You. Indeed, You ˹alone˺ are the Knower of all unseen. 117 I never told them anything except what You ordered me to say: “Worship Allah-my Lord and your Lord!” And I was witness over them as long as I remained among them. But when You took me, You were the Witness over them-and You are a Witness over all things. 118 If You punish them, they belong to You after all. But if You forgive them, You are surely the Almighty, All-Wise.” 119 Allah will declare, “This is the Day when ˹only˺ the faithful will benefit from their faithfulness. Theirs are Gardens under which rivers flow, to stay there for ever and ever. Allah is pleased with them and they are pleased with Him. That is the ultimate triumph.” 120 To Allah ˹alone˺ belongs the kingdom of the heavens and the earth and everything within. And He is Most Capable of everything."
💥 *Are Yahweh and El the same God?* - El was the head of an early Israelite pantheon, with Yahweh as its warrior‐god. Texts that mention both El and Yahweh but not as the same figure (Genesis 49; Numbers 23-24, discussed in the next section; Psalm 82) suggest an early accommodation of the two in some early form of Israelite polytheism.
💥 *What relationship do these false, pagan, gods have with one another?*
El (a pagan god) is the father of many pagan gods including Baal- Hadad, Mot (god of death), Anat (daughter of El), Yam (god of the sea) and Yahweh. Under the Canaanite pantheon, El had 70 sons and a wife named Athirat (Asherah).
Next to El in the pantheon hierarchy is Baal, who was also referred to as Adon which means lord/husband. Adonai used sometimes to refer to God of the Bible is derived from Adon. Baal was also known as god of fertility and storm, rain and drought, at times depicted as a BULL.
EL and Baal were the traditional Canaanite father and son gods and were widely worshipped in Canaan dating back possibly to around 2000 BCE. The worship of El and Baal was prevalent in Canaan and the Phoenician cities, temples of worship were built for El and Baal all over the Levant.
You can't mess with brother hashim.
Alhumdulillah
That man is a fruitcake tryna be smart
But hashim ain't letting you fly so easily
Elah and Elohim means God/god, a term used to also address false gods. Allah/Aalah SWT Is The Proper Name of The Only True God that Jesus pbuh worshiped Alone! Yahweh is a pagan Canaanite deity! 💥 *EL, ASHERAH, BAAL, ADON, YAHWEH, MOLEK.* 💥 Dear Christians. When you read in your Scriptures (The New/Old Testament) and pass by the word Lord, LORD, El, Adonai, Yahweh, you actually invoke the names of pagan deities and gods. Even when a name such as God is used, it still means something WAY DIFFERENT to them than you might even think!
👉 *Psalm 82:1*
*New International Version*
A psalm of Asaph. God presides in the great assembly; he renders judgment among the "gods":
*English Standard Version*
God has taken his place in the divine council; in the midst of the gods he holds judgment:
*NET Bible*
A psalm of Asaph. God stands in the assembly of El; in the midst of the gods he renders judgment.
💥 *THE ACTUAL TRANSLATION*
Elohim (the gods) has taken his place in the assembly of EL (pagan deity), in the midst of the elohim (the gods) He holds judgment.
God
אֱֽלֹהִ֗ים (’ĕlō·hîm)
Noun - masculine plural
Strong's Hebrew 430: gods -- the supreme God, magistrates, a superlative
the gods:
אֱלֹהִ֣ים (’ĕ·lō·hîm)
Noun - masculine plural
Strong's Hebrew 430: gods -- the supreme God, magistrates, a superlative
👉 *Psalm 29:1*
*Holman Christian Standard Bible*
A Davidic psalm. Ascribe to Yahweh, you heavenly beings, ascribe to the LORD glory and strength.
*Douay-Rheims Bible*
A psalm for David, at the finishing of the tabernacle. Bring to the Lord, O ye children of God (SONS OF EL): bring to the Lord the offspring of rams.
*English Revised Version*
A Psalm of David. Give unto the LORD, O ye sons of the mighty (SONS OF EL), give unto the LORD glory and strength.
💥 *ACTUAL TRANSLATION*
Ascribe to Yahweh, O sons of EL, ascribe to Yahweh glory and strength.
to the LORD,
לַֽ֭יהוָה (Yah·weh)
Preposition-l | Noun - proper - masculine singular
Strong's Hebrew 3068: LORD -- the proper name of the God of Israel
👉 *Psalm 89:6*
*New International Version*
For who in the skies above can compare with the LORD? Who is like the LORD among the heavenly beings?
*Literal Standard Version*
For who in the sky, compares himself to YHWH? [Who] is like to YHWH among sons of the mighty?
*Smith's Literal Translation*
For who in the cloud shall be compared to Jehovah? shall he be likened to Jehovah among the sons of God?
*Douay-Rheims Bible*
For who in the clouds can be compared to the Lord: or who among the sons of God shall be like to God?
*Brenton Septuagint Translation*
For who in the heavens shall be compared to the Lord? and who shall be likened to the Lord among the sons of God?
💥 *ACTUAL TRANSLATION*
For who in the skies can be compared to Yahweh, who among the sons of EL is like Yahweh,
@@Shady_Andersonnew international version, what😅, where is the old international one, where is the original one
Jesus is not all knowing. Not God then. Period.
Hashim is a student of the school of the legendary Deedat, and so no wonder he is a bulldoser ...
Christian dont know what contradiction means and a book who have contradiction even one cant called a holly books
nope you never study it thats all and clueless about it
💥 Dear Christians! Do you know that Baal is the brother of Yahweh? And do you know that the Core Essence of Baal worship is a pagan Human Sacrifice? *Early Iron Age (1200-1000 BCE)* - For example, the Israelite religion consisted of Canaanite gods such as El, the ruler of the pantheon, Asherah, his consort, and Baal. Yahweh is described as one of the sons of El in Deuteronomy 32:8-9, but this was removed by a later emendation to the text.
👉 *Deuteronomy 32:8-9*
8 When the Most High gave the nations their inheritance,
when he divided all mankind,
he set up boundaries for the peoples
according to the number of the sons of Israel.
9 For the Lord’s portion is his people,
Jacob his allotted inheritance.
💥 Did Abraham know the name "Yahweh" or he didn't know it? In Genesis, we find "the angel of Yahweh" appearing to Abraham, then Abraham named the place "Yahweh Will Provide", yet that same "Yahweh" appeared to Moses, in Exodus, and informed him that Abraham didn't know "Yahweh" by the name of "Yahweh"! How did Abraham name the place "Yahweh Will Provide" if he didn't know the name "Yahweh"?
👉 *Genesis 22:11-14*
*The angel of Yahweh* called to him out of the sky, and said, "Abraham, Abraham!" He said, "Here I am." He said, "Don't lay your hand on the boy, neither do anything to him. For now I know that you fear God, since you have not withheld your son, your only son, from me." Abraham lifted up his eyes, and looked, and saw that behind him was a ram caught in the thicket by his horns. Abraham went and took the ram, and offered him up for a burnt offering instead of his son. *Abraham called the name of that place Yahweh Will Provide.* As it is said to this day, *"On Yahweh's mountain, it will be provided."*
👉 *Exodus 6:2-3*
God spoke to Moses, and said to him, *"I am Yahweh; and I appeared to Abraham,* to Isaac, and to Jacob, as God Almighty; *BUT BY MY NAME YAHWEH I WAS NOT KNOWN TO THEM.*
💥 Did Abraham know the name "Lord" or he didn't know it? In Genesis, we find "the angel of the Lord" appearing to Abraham, then Abraham named the place "The Lord Will Provide", yet that same "Lord" appeared to Moses, in Exodus, and informed him that Abraham didn't know "Lord" by the name of "Lord"! How did Abraham name the place "The Lord Will Provide" if he didn't know the name "Lord"?
👉 *Genesis 22:11-14* (New King James Version)
11 But *the Angel of the Lord* called to him from heaven and said, “Abraham, Abraham!” So he said, “Here I am.” 12 And He said, “Do not lay your hand on the lad, or do anything to him; for now I know that you fear God, since you have not withheld your son, your only son, from Me.” 13 Then Abraham lifted his eyes and looked, and there behind him was a ram caught in a thicket by its horns. So Abraham went and took the ram, and offered it up for a burnt offering instead of his son. 14 *And Abraham called the name of the place, The-Lord-Will-Provide;* as it is said to this day, “In the Mount of the Lord it shall be provided.”
👉 *Exodus 6:2-3* (New King James Version)
2 And God spoke to Moses and said to him: *“I am the Lord. 3 I appeared to Abraham,* to Isaac, and to Jacob, as God Almighty, *but by My name Lord I was not known to them.*
💥 Did Abraham know the name of "Jehovah" or he didn't know it? In Genesis, we find "the angel of Jehovah" appearing to Abraham, then Abraham named the place "Jehovah Will Provide", yet that same "Jehovah" appeared to Moses, in Exodus, and informed him that Abraham didn't know "Jehovah" by the name of "Jehovah"! How did Abraham name the place "Jehovah Will Provide" if he didn't know the name of "Jehovah"?
👉 *Genesis 22:11-14* (American Standard Version - ASV)
11 And *the angel of Jehovah* called unto him out of heaven, and said, Abraham, Abraham: and he said, Here am I. 12 And he said, Lay not thy hand upon the lad, neither do thou anything unto him; for now I know that thou fearest God, seeing thou hast not withheld thy son, thine only son, from me. 13 And Abraham lifted up his eyes, and looked, and, behold, behind him a ram caught in the thicket by his horns: and Abraham went and took the ram, and offered him up for a burnt-offering in the stead of his son. 14 *And Abraham called the name of that place Jehovah-jireh:* as it is said to this day, *In the mount of Jehovah it shall be provided.*
👉 *Exodus 6:2-3* (American Standard Version - ASV)
And God spake unto Moses, and said unto him, *I am Jehovah: 3 and I appeared unto Abraham,* unto Isaac, and unto Jacob, as God Almighty; *but by my name Jehovah I was not known to them.*