Silly shut down the wrong engine, that's why it landed in the Hudson. He shut down the good engine, which alone could have made the aircraft fly to safety.
Still; shut down the good engine that's why it went down. They fire bird carcasses, tons of water, tons of ice into those turbo fans and they still keep going. A few birds on one side MAY have damaged one engine, but still had the other. And, if he had not shut down the good one, he could have dumped fuel and landed back at the airport, instead of in the drink. Physics all right, no engines, land you in the drink. You really believe that stupid movie? Sounds like it. I would seriously rethink "dumb"!
@@fromthepeanutgallery1084 do you own a jet engine or fly aircraft? Have you worked in the aircraft maintenance industry and disassembled engines? The core of a turbofan is extremely delicate and precise. Taking multiple birds through one causes a cascade failure of bits of metal from the compressor spools getting further injested. Very quickly one has total failure and the other is running sub idle with no useful thrust produced and just enough electrical and hydraulic power to start the apu and move the control surfaces until the apu takes over. Yes the front fan us designed to take birds but not the core. Water and ice is a completely different matter. The N1 percentage would most likely be below 30% so essentially no thrust. Its not as simple as oh he could have just throttled up the 'good' (still wrecked) engine and been okay. The fadec system wouldn't have allowed it and or the engine just wouldn't as there is not enough compression for normal operation. No the movie didn't get everything correct but it was much closer than you are.
@@Jack-hg1hq My point exactly, one engine failed, and he thought he would shut it down, or throttle back to idle, but flamed out the other one instead. (panicked) Lost lift and could not get it started in time and landed in the drink. He shut the good engine down, instead of the damaged one, he got confuse, bottom line. Many aircraft have survived birdstrikes during takeoff, some going on to their next destination, with the damaged turbofan at idle and the second engine flying the kite.
@@fromthepeanutgallery1084 just no. Both engines were wrecked and not producing sufficient thrust to make it to a runway let alone sustained flight. In order to start the engines the apu has to already be running to get the duct pressure above 30psi. It wouldn't have spooled up in enough time, but irrelevant anyway cause you can't start a destroyed engine. While one was 'running' it wasn't producing thrust so you might as well shut it down. Also the safest option because of the fire risk. Due to the compressor stall unburnt fuel was exiting the engine and producing flames behind it which could easily spread to the wing and fuel tanks. It doesn't make you sound smart to disagree with every widely accepted version of events. Mainly cause people like me who fly aircraft, fix them and have built them will shoot you down faster than a grey goose in a cfm-56
reporter low key hitting on Clint
Clint is immortal dam
He could've played sully too. He is a great actor himself
Clint.
Perfection good
prefer clint than tom.
Silly shut down the wrong engine, that's why it landed in the Hudson. He shut down the good engine, which alone could have made the aircraft fly to safety.
go learn how gas turbine engines work, go learn aerodynamics and basic physics, go learn the geography of the area, then you will see how dumb you are
Still; shut down the good engine that's why it went down. They fire bird carcasses, tons of water, tons of ice into those turbo fans and they still keep going. A few birds on one side MAY have damaged one engine, but still had the other. And, if he had not shut down the good one, he could have dumped fuel and landed back at the airport, instead of in the drink. Physics all right, no engines, land you in the drink. You really believe that stupid movie? Sounds like it. I would seriously rethink "dumb"!
@@fromthepeanutgallery1084 do you own a jet engine or fly aircraft? Have you worked in the aircraft maintenance industry and disassembled engines? The core of a turbofan is extremely delicate and precise. Taking multiple birds through one causes a cascade failure of bits of metal from the compressor spools getting further injested. Very quickly one has total failure and the other is running sub idle with no useful thrust produced and just enough electrical and hydraulic power to start the apu and move the control surfaces until the apu takes over. Yes the front fan us designed to take birds but not the core. Water and ice is a completely different matter. The N1 percentage would most likely be below 30% so essentially no thrust. Its not as simple as oh he could have just throttled up the 'good' (still wrecked) engine and been okay. The fadec system wouldn't have allowed it and or the engine just wouldn't as there is not enough compression for normal operation. No the movie didn't get everything correct but it was much closer than you are.
@@Jack-hg1hq My point exactly, one engine failed, and he thought he would shut it down, or throttle back to idle, but flamed out the other one instead. (panicked) Lost lift and could not get it started in time and landed in the drink. He shut the good engine down, instead of the damaged one, he got confuse, bottom line. Many aircraft have survived birdstrikes during takeoff, some going on to their next destination, with the damaged turbofan at idle and the second engine flying the kite.
@@fromthepeanutgallery1084 just no. Both engines were wrecked and not producing sufficient thrust to make it to a runway let alone sustained flight. In order to start the engines the apu has to already be running to get the duct pressure above 30psi. It wouldn't have spooled up in enough time, but irrelevant anyway cause you can't start a destroyed engine. While one was 'running' it wasn't producing thrust so you might as well shut it down. Also the safest option because of the fire risk. Due to the compressor stall unburnt fuel was exiting the engine and producing flames behind it which could easily spread to the wing and fuel tanks. It doesn't make you sound smart to disagree with every widely accepted version of events. Mainly cause people like me who fly aircraft, fix them and have built them will shoot you down faster than a grey goose in a cfm-56