sorry to be off topic but does someone know of a method to log back into an instagram account?? I was dumb lost the account password. I love any help you can offer me.
Yeah, great points raised in this video. However I disagree at 2 things mentioned. I disagree with the statement " He killed her out of his obsessive love". Generally speaking portraying femicide as honour killings or because of excessive love is wrong. We should call it for what it is. I know probably it's fiction but I see regularly the tendency to avoid using the term "femicide" and instead use "family tragedy", "honour killings" etc and since we live at a time where these things take place we have to use the right terms. Because the statement "he killed because of obsessive love" creates feelings of sympathy towards the abuser and killer. He probably killed because he viewed her as his property, and not as a human being. The second thing I disagree with is the idea of being a womanist instead of a feminist. Demonizing the ideology of Feminism because it is not properly understood by some and fought against by the majority does not mean we have to change how the ideolgy that fights for women needs to be changed.
Womanism doesn’t work against feminism. If anything, it’s a branch of feminism. The fact that womanism exists demonstrates the failing of feminism to include all women in its message to begin with.
@@madslam2009v2 I'm not saying it is. Someone can identify as one but it is ridiculous to find different names so you don't call youtself a feminist bevause of the stigma around it. Feminism in its beginning mighjt not have included a lot of groups of women but that doesn't mean that is the case nowadays. It is like saying justice is an idiotic concept because alwaus in history it didnt include everyone. It is not the ideology per se but the way people do it
@@user-se2nq6vo6j all you have to do is a quick research into the history of why womanism exists in the branch of feminism. no movement is a monolith - every aspect of socio/economic/political history can attest to that. (not saying i'm comparing womanism to these branches nor do i agree with it: but even under the feminism branch there's feminists who are TERF, or anti-choice, or anti-sex work.)
It excites me that you guys are exploring people’s book shelves. Thank you SO much. So much.
sorry to be off topic but does someone know of a method to log back into an instagram account??
I was dumb lost the account password. I love any help you can offer me.
@Jordan Crosby instablaster :)
This is SUCH a fun series. I love it.
Love to see these powerful female entrepreneurs! The world needs more of them.
Glory is so awesome, thank you for this!
It’s great idea to tell the children to show and tell the shelves
Yes! Track reading is where it's at. I do it all the time. She and I seem to read the same way 🤓
This is an AWESOME series!!!
What happened to "Tell My Story"?
Yeah, great points raised in this video. However I disagree at 2 things mentioned. I disagree with the statement " He killed her out of his obsessive love". Generally speaking portraying femicide as honour killings or because of excessive love is wrong. We should call it for what it is. I know probably it's fiction but I see regularly the tendency to avoid using the term "femicide" and instead use "family tragedy", "honour killings" etc and since we live at a time where these things take place we have to use the right terms. Because the statement "he killed because of obsessive love" creates feelings of sympathy towards the abuser and killer. He probably killed because he viewed her as his property, and not as a human being.
The second thing I disagree with is the idea of being a womanist instead of a feminist. Demonizing the ideology of Feminism because it is not properly understood by some and fought against by the majority does not mean we have to change how the ideolgy that fights for women needs to be changed.
Womanism doesn’t work against feminism. If anything, it’s a branch of feminism. The fact that womanism exists demonstrates the failing of feminism to include all women in its message to begin with.
@@madslam2009v2 I'm not saying it is. Someone can identify as one but it is ridiculous to find different names so you don't call youtself a feminist bevause of the stigma around it. Feminism in its beginning mighjt not have included a lot of groups of women but that doesn't mean that is the case nowadays. It is like saying justice is an idiotic concept because alwaus in history it didnt include everyone. It is not the ideology per se but the way people do it
@@user-se2nq6vo6j all you have to do is a quick research into the history of why womanism exists in the branch of feminism. no movement is a monolith - every aspect of socio/economic/political history can attest to that. (not saying i'm comparing womanism to these branches nor do i agree with it: but even under the feminism branch there's feminists who are TERF, or anti-choice, or anti-sex work.)
nice
Wow
Hello big like 11 great video see you later
Hi
H-U!!!!
1st comment
First
nope lol
YAY!!!