you prolly dont give a damn but does someone know a method to get back into an instagram account? I was dumb forgot the password. I would love any help you can offer me.
Om ryssland brakar ihop, vilket det ju historiskt har tenderat göra, så kanske vi ska passa på att ta tillbaka kexholm och ingermanland. Oironiskt skulle de nog få de bättre än hos vilken rysk efterträdarstat skulle få kontrollen...
Awesome. It was interesting for me because it's the first time I've ever heard Swedish but understood a lot of what was said without subtitle help. Really beautiful language 👍
Norwegian swedish dutch scots leid and german have alot of cognates with english (cognate is a word that shares a common ancestor word with other languages
damn mate finally a channel that focuses on Scandinavia. I speak Swedish on an OK level and wanna get into Finnish too so I hope you'll be making more sick videos like this.
Just so you know, you might have trouble with Finnish as it is not a North germanic or Scandinavian language, it is entirely separate, It is a Uralic language.
Ångermanland was settled by Norse speaker long before 1150 AD! You can see this in both placenames, placename patterns and archelogical findings. In fact during the first half of the milennia what is today Hälsingland, Medelpad, Ångermanland and parts of Jämtland were its own petty kingdom (the area north of the border forest of Ödemården, desolcated forest, and south of Skuleskogen, Skule forest). The burial mounds along Selånger in Medepad from this era rival that of the mounds in old Uppsala in riches and in wealth - it was not some poor back water area. After the eviromental catastrophy around 536AD and thereafter (several vulcanic eruptions and the following years of global vulcanic winter) the settlments in the north looses their elite characteritics and the population was notibly decreased but never vanished. The political entity was splintred and you can see this when King Sverre of Norway ride first through Hälsingland and the up to Jämtland where he in 1177(?) conqured Jämtland at the battle of Storsjön (on the ice). Here Hälsingland and Jämtland acts as two different political entites, both governed by so called "folk-republics" (similar to Iceland). However it is worth knowing that Jämtland, and most likely the rest of the middle north area as well in some shape or form, was at times paying tribute to the Swedes in exchange for protection from the Norwegian kings, not rarely based in Trondheim at the time. However the Norwegian king Olaf the Holy was held in very high regard and is said to have promoted church building in the whole river vally of Ljungan on his way to the battle Stikkelstad where many men from the area joind him. Had he not died there who knows if the area would perhaps become under Norwegian rule. We know that in the 1200-ish the Swedish king considered the area his subjects. But in his letters he is begging the area to pay tribute, pay taxes and provide military men. A medeival king do not beg and it clearly show that the inhabitants of this area thought of themselves as independent no matter what the king himself thought. It was not until 1320AD that Swedish taxcollectors stopped being killed on the spot and the area started to become a integrated part of the Swedish kingdom. If you swap the area "Ångermanland" out with "Västerbotten" though then the word "colonize" is a somewhat better fit as the majority of norse/Swedish placenames are of a younger date in this area. However you miss quite a big political entity in the region and that is the Finnish speaking Kvens/Kväner who is most likely from whom the elite known as "Birkarlar" (likely meaning merchants who trade with, and later collected tax from, the Sami) came. Along the coastline there had also been home, seasonal amd permantly, to Norse speaking coastal fishers. There is at that many different entities inside what we today just call Sami. So lumping all this groups, with different languages, lifestyles and culture into one with the missrepresetative lable "Sami" is bordeline disrespectful and carry in it self a bad aftertaste of a colonial mindset. That this ares were incoperated into the Swedish kingdom is a fact. If it was voluntarely or involuntarely or both at the same time is a complex issue. However the choices of words are important and using "colonised" indicates that there was no Norsepeaking people there before this date, which is false. The very name "Ångermanland" is old Norse in origin (meaning "the fjord mens land") and even have a flavour of west Norse (like Norwegian; compare "ånger" with Norwegian "anger", as in Stavanger, as the word for "fjord") rather the east Norse (like the Swedes). Infact the dialects of the whole area has flavours of west Norse that the rest of the east coast do not have.
I'm very interested in this time period (1050-1350) for the entire peninsula. You make a lot of claims in your text. Can you point me to a summary paper or two where you get your facts from? If not summary - individual papers. Thanks! ( Please give me a book :) )
@@brickan2 In this Wikilink about Genesmon you find some books on the topic: sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genesmon. Furthermore, a vast majority of the place names along Ångermanälven and the Coastline in Ångermanland are Norse and dated to old Iron Age. However, some of the place names has sapmi, finnish, unclear or hybrid origin.
Now i see why your norwegian pronounciation is so good (Still kinda sounds like a swede tho). Because of your good american english accent i thought that you actually was american. I loved the vid my fellow scandinavian
@@freefalling6960 I know. Don't really remember why I commented this over 2 years ago. I might have commented on a different video here by a mistake. He has a really good video on the Norwegian language. Either that or I complemented his pronouciation of Norwegian territories. :3
@@freefalling6960 After rereading my comment many times, I can say that I meant that his Norwegian pronounciation (in a different video) made sense to be good after learning (through this video) that he's swedish. Before this I thought he was an native english speaking American.
Utmärkt sammanfattning, och fint att inte bara visa gränsförändringarna utan även ge litet kontext vid varje årtal. Apropå pantsättningen av Wismar 1803 så var det ju en pantsättning på 100 år. Sverige hade kunnat lösa in lånet 1903 och återfått provinsen, även om det varit dyrt, bisarrt och onödigt.
Estonia was very rich part of Sweden, sweden was lucky that Estonian nobility wanted to join Sweden. Even today, Sweden would be happy to have Estonia as Estonians are smarter and more progressive than Swedes.
@@EstViking > Estonia was very rich Literally consisted of a feudal hellhole with impoverished practically enslaved native serfs ruled by colonizing germans >Estonian nobility I don't know about you but I would not bestow the title of Estonian on people who had "von" in their surnames, spoke german, launched crusades, and looked down on and oppressed your nation for centuries >Even today Sweden would be happy to have Estonia Bro... Do you not want independence or what? And btw, most Swedes can't even place Estonia on a map >Estonians are smarter and more progressive than Swedes I dunno about that one bro
@@alfatejpblind6498 look at PISA score tests, startups per capita, etc. I havent said anything about wanting to go under Swedish rule. Dont put words into mouth. Sweden itseld had serfdom ( as whole europe in that matter ) at the time, so your information is irrelevant. I was talking about region itself. Stop using illogical demagogy.
Satakunta is currently Satakunta in Swedish also. It is a translation of Hundare (Hundred in English) i.e. an area that would raise a hundred soldiers.
The way I have understood it is that Satakunta is used for the modern province, while Satakunda is still preferred for the historical province. The latter is the name I am most familiar with in historical contexts, personally. A quick google search makes me wonder if anyone really knows... Uppslagsverket Finland uses 'Satakunta' for both the modern and the historical province, while Mediespråk mentions 'Satakunda' as an 'outdated/historical form' but also notes that 'Satakunta' is used "for modern situations". Swedish wikipedia uses Satakunta for the modern province, and Satakunda for the historical one.
Kunta is a municipality, so Satakunta could refer to a hundred municipalities. But as Finnish is a weird language, the meaning is totally different. It is more like a company of a hundred, a group of a hundred. A good comparison is 'venekunta' which means the crew of a boat. Or 'lautakunta' which means a board or a jury. Literally satakunta also means 'about a hundred' or 'roughly a hundred' but that is hardly the historic meaning of the word.
Intressant och lärorikt. Intressant att Sverige och Danmark varit i krig så mycket men sedan gränserna blev lättare att försvara och gick mer i enlighet med naturens förutsättningar har det varit fred.
Interesting. Tack så mycket! However, there was no “Russia” in the 17th century, as it was called Moskovia at the time. It started being called “Russia” in the 18th century, with czar Peter I. Besides, it the 13th century Novgorod was connected to Rus, which was not the same thing as the modern Russia.
The Russian tsardom existed since the 1550s, when Muscovy was officially renamed. If you want to talk about modern nations as a concept altogether though, you could just as well make the claim that there existed no "Sweden" eighter. People identified much closer to people from the same Landskap than some abstract concept of "Sweden" and "Swedishness" and had essentially no national allegiance as we would conceive of the concept today.
According to Ottar from Hålogaland (visiting king Alfred of Wessex around 890, i.e. 1130 years ago) Norway reached up to about todays Tromsø. He knew, because he lived there. He was also granted the right to tax the Sami-people. One may ask who it was that could grant such rights to his underlings? Ottar (in English Othere) told king Alfred about Norway, and he also knew of the Svear and Daner and the Kvener (swedes, danes and finns) and where they lived! He also visited the Bjarmer (present day Russia) and gave king Alfred a gift he had purchased from the people he met in Bjarmeland. Actually he understood the languages of the Bjarmer because they spoke a language very similar to the Samis. At that time it was a group closely related to the Sami that lived along the shore of the White Sea (as we call it). Maybe the most important thing was that he told king Alfred that he was a Norwegian that came from Norway, and he also tried to explain how the Norwegians differed from the neigbouring countries of Svear and Daner.
Var det inte någon fästning i Åländska skärgården som finnarna råkade bygga på den svenska sidan av en ö i modern tid, som fick kompenseras av att Sverige fick mark från finska sidan av ön? (vilket förvisso är en historisk fotnot men trots allt är en gränsförändring).
Skäret heter Märket. Ryssland byggde en fyr på den svenska sidan 1885 utan att någondera part verkar ha reflekterat över det, vilket ledde till en gränsjustering hundra år senare.
@@Javlafan Vad exakt var bra med den tiden för den genomsnittlige estlänningen? Svenska kronan intervenerade inte alls till estlänningarnas förtjänst, snarare till deras nackdel då de feodala tyska landägarnas rättigheter stärktes och kunde öka sitt förtryck över den livegna lokalbefolkningen. Kanske kallas det "den gamla goda svensktiden" för att det nuvarande historiska narrativet skrevs av dessa i praktiken slavägande tyskar som bedrev kulturellt folkmord mot din befolkning? Hmm...
@@ylvagustafsson1242 Without Denmark, Greenland would be the worst non Communist country in existence. The first Swedes and Norwegians actually settled their current lands long before the first "natives" arrived. If the Sami want their own country, they would starve to death!
@ylvagustafsson1242 very much not. Greenland has a lot of independence. It's only really within foreign politics that Denmark sets policies. Most internal stuff is completely up the Greenlandic government.
Kom bara ihåg att fred inte är motsatsen till krig. Fred under förtryck, med förföljelser och hård beskattning kan vara nästan lika destruktivs som krig.
om vi inte hade krigat som vi gjorde så hade vi inte haft ett land idag. verkligheten är inte en dans på rosor antingen erövrar man eller så blir man erövrad
So interesting! My family name is Richter and I have tried to figure out how I have this German name. I have traced my ancestry back to Uppsala in the middle of 1600. Then the traces are not clear. There are soldiers with the name Richter who fled the Russians from the Baltics. I would really appreciate if anyone could help me find out more.
The Thirty Years War was the first great mixer of the European nations. Half of Germany was occupied by Swedish troops around 1650, though vast parts were devastated and almost depopulated. Following the retreating troops to Sweden wouldn't have been a bad choice. Some parts of the country had even been annexed by Sweden, their citizens became subjects of the Swedish kingdom.
10:40 If Finland had agreed to the territorial changes demanded by Stalin, in order to get St. Petersburg a safety zone, would this perhaps have been sufficient? Savonlinna's Olavi castle would still be a border fortress. This is related to speculation so that Finland's drift into the winter war could have been avoided?
Read about Hitler-Stalin pact 1939 and about the secret division of spheres of interest between Nazi-Germany and the Soviet Union in this Pact: For example Finland belonged to the sphere of interest of the Soviet Union and according to it the Soviet Union attacked Finland in November 1939 (the Winter War). If it would have been question about giving some minor pieces of Finnish territory to the Soviet Union, why for example did Stalin built up a whole "Finnish government" in the Soviet Union for Finland led by an emigrant Finnish communist to be used to replace the democratic government of Finland in Finland OR why did the Soviet Union attack against Finland at the same time from Hanko to Petsamo= against the whole long eastern border of Finland OR why did Shostakovitsh compose a symphony to be played in Helsinki after the Red Army would have occupied the capital of Finland, Helsinki, & the whole country of Finland, IF the question would have been giving SOME LITTLE PIECES OF FINNISH TERRITORY NEAR THE SOVIET UNION BORDER TO THE SOVIET UNION?
@@marjaananivala3150 We'll never know that. However, the family background of the then foreign minister Erkko is known. Finland's situation was different compared to other Lilliputian countries conquered by the Soviet Union. Would Finland have been able to give security guarantees and stay out of the war?
@@IZMyTube_Outrage My questions were rhetoric. It is clear that the Soviet Union tried to occupy the whole country of Finland and make it a part of the Soviet Union as it had already done to the eastern part of Poland ( Nazi-Germany had occupied the western part of Poland) and as the Soviet Union did to Estonia, Lithuania and Latvia for example ACCORDING TO WHAT HITLER AND STALIN HAD AGREED IN HITLER-STALIN PACT EARLIER IN AUGUST 1939. Surely there were then also such people who believed in Soviet propaganda or did not want to believe that territorial demands presented by the Soviet Union were only like a smoke screen hiding the real purpose of occupying Finland by Stalin. This matter, however, became clear to so many Finnish people when the Finnish people watched what happened to ALL THE THREE INDEPENDENT BALTIC STATES WHEN THEY AGREED WITH THE SOVIET UNION TO GIVE MILITARY BASES FROM THEIR COUNTRIES ASKED BY THE SOVIET UNION AND HOW THEY LOST THEIR INDEPENDENCE AFTER THAT. The Finnish people did not want the same. When the Winter War broke, even many foreign correspondents in other western democrcies considered that Finland would collapse and be occupied very soon as had done to the Baltic states, but it did NOT HAPPEN. FINLAND kept it's independence before, during and after the WW II and the capital of Finland, Helsinki, was one of the three capitals of European countries which took part of that war and were NOT occupied: the others were London and Moscow.All glory, praise, thanksgiving and worship only to God the Father forever! With the love of the Lord Jesus Christ, Miss Marjaana Nivala, a Christian from Finland, the land of my fathers
@@marjaananivala3150 I don't think Sweden was occupied? ”Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact” I think the contract you refer to is not valid in this context. Those Lilliputian states could not be trusted to provide a security guarantee for the expansion of Nazi Germany, which was seen as the war continued. You have to remember that Finland lost the war and the Soviet Union never properly attacked Finland because it was urgent to get to Berlin to end the war and declare itself the winner.
Fast du glömde berätta vad som hände med Wismar: 1903 beslutade man att inte lösa panten (som hade varit på 100 år), varpå staden slutligt övergick i tysk ägo.
Hi. I actually don't understand the language, but as a slovak speaker, the word ,,sveriges,, catched my eyes. It is wery similar to SEVER whitch means north (eng). SVERNIK could be translated as : Northerner. This is also in other slavic languages.
If I remember correctly, Sverige is actually the danish translation (In danish Sve/Svea = Swede, Rige = Kingdom) for the older Swedish name of Sweden "Svea Rike" (Swede/Svea Kingdom). That danish name for Sweden is still used by swedes as the name of their country. It's quite ironic how our biggest rivals, the danes, gave us the name of our country, and that it stuck :D
@@marcelhalza6916Svea is the name of the area where Svearna lived sweden is the kingdom of svearna, sweden is "Svearnas Rike" which after a while became "Sverige". Svearna is the name of the people who lived in modern day southern sweden
@@SwedishDrunkard5963 Alright, but how did that area got its name. Why it is called Svea ? Land got the name from people and people got the name from the same Land?
Tekniskt sett fick vi inte Norge. När Norge gjorde sig självständigt gick armen över och tog det. Det finns en anledning varför vi räknar att vårt sista krig utfördes år 1814
Norway was struck hard by the black death there was almost no Norwegians left to defend previously conquered terretories thats why it got married into Danmark and why it lost so Much land. There where around 150 000 Norwegians left to rule and defend norway iceland Grenland and the Islands so it fell. Around 300 000 people died from the black death and our royal male Line died in war.
Dags för ett nytt krig mot Ryssland, Danmark och Norge helst samtidigt då och norra Polen och Tyskland också va? 😉 Nej! Jag är glad till vår nuvarande hållning. Men Nato? Den tål att fundera på. Carsten
maybe Sweden Norway and Denmark got more in common :D Greetings from Finland, we have been busy during the couple hundred of years building back our language and culture :D
@@ristusnotta1653 The Swedish, Norwegian and Danish languages might be more similar, but Finland, or rather Suomi will always be a part of Sweden (in heart and soul). We love you and always will. Like a caring older sibling we are always keeping a watchful eye on the antics of our little brother to the east but we need to let you do your own thing so you can grow up to fulfill your potential. I am Swedish but parts of my ancestry are from Finland aswell. 🇸🇪❤️🇫🇮 Rakastan Suomea ikuisesti!
Love it!
Learning Swedish and history at the same time.
A lovely combination!
Baux Sedai yes.
hej
Undra hur det gick med svenska studierna?
you prolly dont give a damn but does someone know a method to get back into an instagram account?
I was dumb forgot the password. I would love any help you can offer me.
Honestly I keep coming back to this video because I am both interested in Stormaktstid and because I want to learn how to talk about it in Swedish
Det er virkeligt godt lavet. Elsker Sverige, Norge og Findland. Fedt at være Nordisk.
Alla goda ting är 3! Scandinavien! 🇩🇰🇧🇻🇸🇪
Brödrafolkets Väl!
En nordisk union för de nordiska folken ville eg ha.
Finn here, I love our Nordic countries and culture too!
Nordisk power!!! Vi ska ta tillbaka vårt älskade norden!!!
.... Medetiden... Av Sverige.. 🤫✌️👍🕊️🇫🇴❤️✌️✌️✌️✌️💋
Wildeshausen is so only about 400 km from my home :) Can't believe it used to belong to Sweden! Greetings from Belgium.
Should be proud of that
Ingermanland is where I, my dad, my granddad and also my great granddad were born. That feeling when the author is speaking about your homeland
Tack för den här videon som är mycket informativ och har också hjälpt mig att förbättra min svenska :)
Varsågod :)
Skitbra gjort! Hoppas det kommer fler videor om gränsändringar eller svensk historia.
Tack! Så småningom blir det säkert mer :)
@@skoter2987 väx upp
@@swedneck Det var inte så snällt
@@swedneck det blev inget…
јеси ли ти србин?
Valdigt interessant! Som en finsk-amerikan med svensk ursprung, allting med Sverige intresserar mig.
Riktigt bra. Denna bör många fler (historielösa) människor se.
vi förtjänar Finland tillbaka
Bra program👍
Nu kan vi göra som Ryssland o hävda våran rätt till vissa områden. Vi har ju historiska rättigheter.
Om ryssland brakar ihop, vilket det ju historiskt har tenderat göra, så kanske vi ska passa på att ta tillbaka kexholm och ingermanland. Oironiskt skulle de nog få de bättre än hos vilken rysk efterträdarstat skulle få kontrollen...
Nej tack😅🇫🇮
Ryssland, Israel etc är bara att välja och vraka😅
Helt rätt🇸🇪🇸🇪🇸🇪🇸🇪
Eller som USA, hävda vår rätt till alla möjliga områden utan några som helst historiska rättigheter 😂
Awesome. It was interesting for me because it's the first time I've ever heard Swedish but understood a lot of what was said without subtitle help. Really beautiful language 👍
Norwegian swedish dutch scots leid and german have alot of cognates with english (cognate is a word that shares a common ancestor word with other languages
Germanic-derived languages are similar in their structure of speech, and word pronunciations, well, unless you’re speaking danish.
Fantastiskt spännande presentation. Bra jobbat!
damn mate finally a channel that focuses on Scandinavia. I speak Swedish on an OK level and wanna get into Finnish too so I hope you'll be making more sick videos like this.
Lycka till på din Svenska, hoppas det fortsätter bra!
memez trojan perkele qää wää e ää ää ää ää ää ää ää ää ää ää ää. ää ää ää ää ää ää ää ää ää
@@welp4576 mitää vittua sä siellä selität?
Just so you know, you might have trouble with Finnish as it is not a North germanic or Scandinavian language, it is entirely separate, It is a Uralic language.
@@pyromorph6540 How can you be so arrogant to think that the OP doesn't have a clue?
Mycket välgjort och intressant, youtube behöver fler videor som denna!
Tack så mycket!
Grymt bra video och väldigt detaljrik sammanfattning. Tusen tack!!
Ångermanland was settled by Norse speaker long before 1150 AD! You can see this in both placenames, placename patterns and archelogical findings. In fact during the first half of the milennia what is today Hälsingland, Medelpad, Ångermanland and parts of Jämtland were its own petty kingdom (the area north of the border forest of Ödemården, desolcated forest, and south of Skuleskogen, Skule forest). The burial mounds along Selånger in Medepad from this era rival that of the mounds in old Uppsala in riches and in wealth - it was not some poor back water area. After the eviromental catastrophy around 536AD and thereafter (several vulcanic eruptions and the following years of global vulcanic winter) the settlments in the north looses their elite characteritics and the population was notibly decreased but never vanished. The political entity was splintred and you can see this when King Sverre of Norway ride first through Hälsingland and the up to Jämtland where he in 1177(?) conqured Jämtland at the battle of Storsjön (on the ice). Here Hälsingland and Jämtland acts as two different political entites, both governed by so called "folk-republics" (similar to Iceland).
However it is worth knowing that Jämtland, and most likely the rest of the middle north area as well in some shape or form, was at times paying tribute to the Swedes in exchange for protection from the Norwegian kings, not rarely based in Trondheim at the time.
However the Norwegian king Olaf the Holy was held in very high regard and is said to have promoted church building in the whole river vally of Ljungan on his way to the battle Stikkelstad where many men from the area joind him. Had he not died there who knows if the area would perhaps become under Norwegian rule.
We know that in the 1200-ish the Swedish king considered the area his subjects. But in his letters he is begging the area to pay tribute, pay taxes and provide military men. A medeival king do not beg and it clearly show that the inhabitants of this area thought of themselves as independent no matter what the king himself thought. It was not until 1320AD that Swedish taxcollectors stopped being killed on the spot and the area started to become a integrated part of the Swedish kingdom.
If you swap the area "Ångermanland" out with "Västerbotten" though then the word "colonize" is a somewhat better fit as the majority of norse/Swedish placenames are of a younger date in this area. However you miss quite a big political entity in the region and that is the Finnish speaking Kvens/Kväner who is most likely from whom the elite known as "Birkarlar" (likely meaning merchants who trade with, and later collected tax from, the Sami) came. Along the coastline there had also been home, seasonal amd permantly, to Norse speaking coastal fishers. There is at that many different entities inside what we today just call Sami. So lumping all this groups, with different languages, lifestyles and culture into one with the missrepresetative lable "Sami" is bordeline disrespectful and carry in it self a bad aftertaste of a colonial mindset.
That this ares were incoperated into the Swedish kingdom is a fact. If it was voluntarely or involuntarely or both at the same time is a complex issue. However the choices of words are important and using "colonised" indicates that there was no Norsepeaking people there before this date, which is false. The very name "Ångermanland" is old Norse in origin (meaning "the fjord mens land") and even have a flavour of west Norse (like Norwegian; compare "ånger" with Norwegian "anger", as in Stavanger, as the word for "fjord") rather the east Norse (like the Swedes). Infact the dialects of the whole area has flavours of west Norse that the rest of the east coast do not have.
I'm very interested in this time period (1050-1350) for the entire peninsula. You make a lot of claims in your text. Can you point me to a summary paper or two where you get your facts from? If not summary - individual papers. Thanks! ( Please give me a book :) )
@@brickan2 In this Wikilink about Genesmon you find some books on the topic: sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genesmon. Furthermore, a vast majority of the place names along Ångermanälven and the Coastline in Ångermanland are Norse and dated to old Iron Age. However, some of the place names has sapmi, finnish, unclear or hybrid origin.
Juhatasid mind mõtlema
INTRESSANT VIDEO, SPENDERADE MIN LÖRDAG MED FAMILJEN OCH FICK EN HÄRLIG KONVERSION RUNT MATBORDET 👍
Bästa videon någonsin
Intressant,
Det där visste jag inte så i detalj.
Thanks allot friends, 🙏👍🙂🇸🇪
Tack för denna video!
Tack!
?
Now i see why your norwegian pronounciation is so good (Still kinda sounds like a swede tho). Because of your good american english accent i thought that you actually was american. I loved the vid my fellow scandinavian
This is Swedish
@@freefalling6960 I know. Don't really remember why I commented this over 2 years ago. I might have commented on a different video here by a mistake. He has a really good video on the Norwegian language. Either that or I complemented his pronouciation of Norwegian territories. :3
@@freefalling6960 After rereading my comment many times, I can say that I meant that his Norwegian pronounciation (in a different video) made sense to be good after learning (through this video) that he's swedish. Before this I thought he was an native english speaking American.
Tack! Så intressant!
tack, bra att veta
Väldigt roligt att få veta det här har alltid undrat men nu vet jag
likte denne vedlig godt, presis, og oversiktelig! 👌
trevlig video fortsätt
Väldigt intressant! Lägger ut länken på cuzz.
7:50 Stolta Älgtårar.
10:36 Ledsna älgtårar :'(
Neeeeej
Bra berättat! :)
Thanks a lot for a very informative and pedagogical video.
bra gjort, tydligt och intressant.
Tack lärorikt till max i denna lagom långa film
imponerande tydlighet 👌
Thank god there's an actual English subtitle, to whoever translated, whether it be the creator or a random person I shall worship you.
Utmärkt sammanfattning, och fint att inte bara visa gränsförändringarna utan även ge litet kontext vid varje årtal.
Apropå pantsättningen av Wismar 1803 så var det ju en pantsättning på 100 år. Sverige hade kunnat lösa in lånet 1903 och återfått provinsen, även om det varit dyrt, bisarrt och onödigt.
Onödigt, ja kanske, men fatta hur annorlunda hela 1900-talet hade blivit...
@@Lemonadee771 Absolut! Ett svenskt område i Tyskland under det tidiga 1900-talet? Vi hade mycket väl kunnas dras in i Första världskriget då.
Föredömlig video!
Inte bara Samer, vi Tornedalingar/Kväner fanns där med!
Bra forklart :) Jeg tror det mangler en kort men spesiell hendelse i 1644 eller noe. Vanskelig å finne info.
As one Swede once told me: Svenska Estland är det bästa Estland :)
Estonia was very rich part of Sweden, sweden was lucky that Estonian nobility wanted to join Sweden.
Even today, Sweden would be happy to have Estonia as Estonians are smarter and more progressive than Swedes.
@@EstViking > Estonia was very rich
Literally consisted of a feudal hellhole with impoverished practically enslaved native serfs ruled by colonizing germans
>Estonian nobility
I don't know about you but I would not bestow the title of Estonian on people who had "von" in their surnames, spoke german, launched crusades, and looked down on and oppressed your nation for centuries
>Even today Sweden would be happy to have Estonia
Bro... Do you not want independence or what? And btw, most Swedes can't even place Estonia on a map
>Estonians are smarter and more progressive than Swedes
I dunno about that one bro
@@alfatejpblind6498 look at PISA score tests, startups per capita, etc.
I havent said anything about wanting to go under Swedish rule. Dont put words into mouth.
Sweden itseld had serfdom ( as whole europe in that matter ) at the time, so your information is irrelevant.
I was talking about region itself.
Stop using illogical demagogy.
@@alfatejpblind6498 I'm not arguing with you on the rest but you're kind of stepping on your own point with the last two statements haha
@@pinkbabycrocs5577 haha what do you mean bro
Så vackert🥲
Bra!
I have recently discover, that my great grandfather was born in Småland. And myself are finnish in 3rd generation
That was great! Thanks.
Satakunta is currently Satakunta in Swedish also. It is a translation of Hundare (Hundred in English) i.e. an area that would raise a hundred soldiers.
The way I have understood it is that Satakunta is used for the modern province, while Satakunda is still preferred for the historical province. The latter is the name I am most familiar with in historical contexts, personally.
A quick google search makes me wonder if anyone really knows... Uppslagsverket Finland uses 'Satakunta' for both the modern and the historical province, while Mediespråk mentions 'Satakunda' as an 'outdated/historical form' but also notes that 'Satakunta' is used "for modern situations". Swedish wikipedia uses Satakunta for the modern province, and Satakunda for the historical one.
Hundred counties.
Kunta is a municipality, so Satakunta could refer to a hundred municipalities. But as Finnish is a weird language, the meaning is totally different. It is more like a company of a hundred, a group of a hundred. A good comparison is 'venekunta' which means the crew of a boat. Or 'lautakunta' which means a board or a jury.
Literally satakunta also means 'about a hundred' or 'roughly a hundred' but that is hardly the historic meaning of the word.
Hade varit roligt om du tog med svenska kolonier samtidigt som de facto var svenska områden :)
ja
Väldigt bra förklarat
Intressant och lärorikt. Intressant att Sverige och Danmark varit i krig så mycket men sedan gränserna blev lättare att försvara och gick mer i enlighet med naturens förutsättningar har det varit fred.
Interesting. Tack så mycket! However, there was no “Russia” in the 17th century, as it was called Moskovia at the time. It started being called “Russia” in the 18th century, with czar Peter I.
Besides, it the 13th century Novgorod was connected to Rus, which was not the same thing as the modern Russia.
The Russian tsardom existed since the 1550s, when Muscovy was officially renamed.
If you want to talk about modern nations as a concept altogether though, you could just as well make the claim that there existed no "Sweden" eighter. People identified much closer to people from the same Landskap than some abstract concept of "Sweden" and "Swedishness" and had essentially no national allegiance as we would conceive of the concept today.
Åh Äntligen en svensk video
Genialisk video!!
Why do I somehow understand this without subtitles?
Skönt att vi blev av med Norge.
Intressant!
INTRESTING!!
It’s weird listening to Germanic languages as a Brit, it’s like you can understand what he’s saying but don’t know what the words mean
English is a Germanic languag too.
originally it was. Now it's a mix of latin, greek, french, and old english@@PalkkiTT
Kan du inte göra en film om vilka gränser Sverige hade utanför Europa
According to Ottar from Hålogaland (visiting king Alfred of Wessex around 890, i.e. 1130 years ago) Norway reached up to about todays Tromsø.
He knew, because he lived there. He was also granted the right to tax the Sami-people. One may ask who it was that could grant such rights to his underlings?
Ottar (in English Othere) told king Alfred about Norway, and he also knew of the Svear and Daner and the Kvener (swedes, danes and finns) and where they lived! He also visited the Bjarmer (present day Russia) and gave king Alfred a gift he had purchased from the people he met in Bjarmeland. Actually he understood the languages of the Bjarmer because they spoke a language very similar to the Samis. At that time it was a group closely related to the Sami that lived along the shore of the White Sea (as we call it).
Maybe the most important thing was that he told king Alfred that he was a Norwegian that came from Norway, and he also tried to explain how the Norwegians differed from the neigbouring countries of Svear and Daner.
Var det inte någon fästning i Åländska skärgården som finnarna råkade bygga på den svenska sidan av en ö i modern tid, som fick kompenseras av att Sverige fick mark från finska sidan av ön? (vilket förvisso är en historisk fotnot men trots allt är en gränsförändring).
Skäret heter Märket. Ryssland byggde en fyr på den svenska sidan 1885 utan att någondera part verkar ha reflekterat över det, vilket ledde till en gränsjustering hundra år senare.
"If liberty means anything at all,
it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear" - George Orwell
8:04 The Boss when you fight him
0:09 The Boss when you unlock him as a playable character
Svenska landskapsnamnen minner om tiden, då det var flera små kungdömen. Däran ex GotLAND, JämtLAND, SmåLAND, osv.
Nyland🇫🇮
PERKELE! 😁
Älskade Sverige!
8:04 Den gamla goda tiden. The good old days. Ah..
I Estland vi kallar denna period "den gamla goda svensktiden" :)
@@Javlafan Vad exakt var bra med den tiden för den genomsnittlige estlänningen? Svenska kronan intervenerade inte alls till estlänningarnas förtjänst, snarare till deras nackdel då de feodala tyska landägarnas rättigheter stärktes och kunde öka sitt förtryck över den livegna lokalbefolkningen. Kanske kallas det "den gamla goda svensktiden" för att det nuvarande historiska narrativet skrevs av dessa i praktiken slavägande tyskar som bedrev kulturellt folkmord mot din befolkning? Hmm...
And this, my friend, is why UA-cam added subtitles
Bra video
8:00 ett namn, Axel Oxenstierna
Excellent
- Å fan!
8:09 Laughs in Stormaktssverige
Bra video, men hva med sveriges kolonier?
Dem får vi ta i en annen film :)
subtitles in swedish maybe?
There are subtitels in both english and Swedish. You just have to turn them on
8:03 Detta är Sverige. Vi borde avnazifiera Finland & Baltikum! (för att använda Putins narrativ) 😁
There was a time when Sweden was a part of Finland.
I never knew you were Swedish (I don’t even know if you are speaking Swedish but probably yes because this is a video about Sweden)
it is swedish
Oj sverige var litet!
So why didnt you visualize the colonies? Ive always been fascinated that Denmark and Sweden had colonial empires
Sweden, Norway, Finland and Russia are still colonizing Sápmi. Denmark are still ”owner” of Greenland.
@@ylvagustafsson1242 Without Denmark, Greenland would be the worst non Communist country in existence.
The first Swedes and Norwegians actually settled their current lands long before the first "natives" arrived.
If the Sami want their own country, they would starve to death!
@ylvagustafsson1242 very much not. Greenland has a lot of independence. It's only really within foreign politics that Denmark sets policies. Most internal stuff is completely up the Greenlandic government.
At least for Sweden’s part using the term ‘Colonial Empire’ is really an exaggeration.
Fred är bästa som finns i världen. Krig ar onödigt och tråkigt bättre liva med fred. Hoppas hela världen blir fred en vacker dag så folk slipper fly
Kom bara ihåg att fred inte är motsatsen till krig. Fred under förtryck, med förföljelser och hård beskattning kan vara nästan lika destruktivs som krig.
om vi inte hade krigat som vi gjorde så hade vi inte haft ett land idag. verkligheten är inte en dans på rosor antingen erövrar man eller så blir man erövrad
Håller med, så vi slipper dom här 👍
gillar svensk histora
6:33 alle nordmenn og danskers mareritt
hahahahahahaha ja
Fram til 1826 vat Karasjok og Kautokeino del av Sverige. Riksgrensa gikk på Skoganvarre i Porsanger kommune nord for Karasjok.
Uppslöts ite Kalmarunionen 1523? Dvs 500-års jubileum i år?!
Nej, 1523 blev Gustav Vasa krönt till kung. Den 6:e Juni för att vara specifik.
@@magnusnilsson9792 Tack för svar!
So interesting!
My family name is Richter and I have tried to figure out how I have this German name.
I have traced my ancestry back to Uppsala in the middle of 1600. Then the traces are not clear.
There are soldiers with the name Richter who fled the Russians from the Baltics.
I would really appreciate if anyone could help me find out more.
The Thirty Years War was the first great mixer of the European nations. Half of Germany was occupied by Swedish troops around 1650, though vast parts were devastated and almost depopulated. Following the retreating troops to Sweden wouldn't have been a bad choice. Some parts of the country had even been annexed by Sweden, their citizens became subjects of the Swedish kingdom.
men finland då?
10:55 det där sved
🇫🇮❤️🇸🇪
#TaTillbakaÅland
hahahaahaha
Även om dem för det mesta talar svenska vill dem ha självständighet från både Finland och Sverige
@@EmilForsberg_GRYBO no Ålanders know that they're better off with Finland so they'll stay with us.
@@SocialistFinn1 ... um... im sorry that makes no sense... i don't think i understand what you mean
@@EmilForsberg_GRYBO You said that Ålanders want to be independent, but most of them actually want to be a part of Finland.
10:40 If Finland had agreed to the territorial changes demanded by Stalin, in order to get St. Petersburg a safety zone, would this perhaps have been sufficient? Savonlinna's Olavi castle would still be a border fortress. This is related to speculation so that Finland's drift into the winter war could have been avoided?
Read about Hitler-Stalin pact 1939 and about the secret division of spheres of interest between Nazi-Germany and the Soviet Union in this Pact: For example Finland belonged to the sphere of interest of the Soviet Union and according to it the Soviet Union attacked Finland in November 1939 (the Winter War). If it would have been question about giving some minor pieces of Finnish territory to the Soviet Union, why for example did Stalin built up a whole "Finnish government" in the Soviet Union for Finland led by an emigrant Finnish communist to be used to replace the democratic government of Finland in Finland OR why did the Soviet Union attack against Finland at the same time from Hanko to Petsamo= against the whole long eastern border of Finland OR why did Shostakovitsh compose a symphony to be played in Helsinki after the Red Army would have occupied the capital of Finland, Helsinki, & the whole country of Finland, IF the question would have been giving SOME LITTLE PIECES OF FINNISH TERRITORY NEAR THE SOVIET UNION BORDER TO THE SOVIET UNION?
@@marjaananivala3150 We'll never know that. However, the family background of the then foreign minister Erkko is known. Finland's situation was different compared to other Lilliputian countries conquered by the Soviet Union. Would Finland have been able to give security guarantees and stay out of the war?
@@IZMyTube_Outrage My questions were rhetoric. It is clear that the Soviet Union tried to occupy the whole country of Finland and make it a part of the Soviet Union as it had already done to the eastern part of Poland ( Nazi-Germany had occupied the western part of Poland) and as the Soviet Union did to Estonia, Lithuania and Latvia for example ACCORDING TO WHAT HITLER AND STALIN HAD AGREED IN HITLER-STALIN PACT EARLIER IN AUGUST 1939. Surely there were then also such people who believed in Soviet propaganda or did not want to believe that territorial demands presented by the Soviet Union were only like a smoke screen hiding the real purpose of occupying Finland by Stalin. This matter, however, became clear to so many Finnish people when the Finnish people watched what happened to ALL THE THREE INDEPENDENT BALTIC STATES WHEN THEY AGREED WITH THE SOVIET UNION TO GIVE MILITARY BASES FROM THEIR COUNTRIES ASKED BY THE SOVIET UNION AND HOW THEY LOST THEIR INDEPENDENCE AFTER THAT. The Finnish people did not want the same. When the Winter War broke, even many foreign correspondents in other western democrcies considered that Finland would collapse and be occupied very soon as had done to the Baltic states, but it did NOT HAPPEN. FINLAND kept it's independence before, during and after the WW II and the capital of Finland, Helsinki, was one of the three capitals of European countries which took part of that war and were NOT occupied: the others were London and Moscow.All glory, praise, thanksgiving and worship only to God the Father forever! With the love of the Lord Jesus Christ, Miss Marjaana Nivala, a Christian from Finland, the land of my fathers
@@marjaananivala3150 I don't think Sweden was occupied? ”Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact”
I think the contract you refer to is not valid in this context. Those Lilliputian states could not be trusted to provide a security guarantee for the expansion of Nazi Germany, which was seen as the war continued. You have to remember that Finland lost the war and the Soviet Union never properly attacked Finland because it was urgent to get to Berlin to end the war and declare itself the winner.
Veldig interessant som nordmann å se hvordan Sverige ble til og grensene ble slik de er i dag.
❤❤❤👍
Fast du glömde berätta vad som hände med Wismar: 1903 beslutade man att inte lösa panten (som hade varit på 100 år), varpå staden slutligt övergick i tysk ägo.
Ja, det glömdes
Enkelt men utmärkt.
Hi. I actually don't understand the language, but as a slovak speaker, the word ,,sveriges,, catched my eyes. It is wery similar to SEVER whitch means north (eng). SVERNIK could be translated as : Northerner. This is also in other slavic languages.
According to Wiktionary, север is etymologically related to the english word "shower". Interesting.
If I remember correctly, Sverige is actually the danish translation (In danish Sve/Svea = Swede, Rige = Kingdom) for the older Swedish name of Sweden "Svea Rike" (Swede/Svea Kingdom). That danish name for Sweden is still used by swedes as the name of their country. It's quite ironic how our biggest rivals, the danes, gave us the name of our country, and that it stuck :D
@@Brakvash Thanks. And what does SVEA mean ? RIGE mean Empire ? Thats great. IT is simmilar to "Ríša" which has the samé meaning.
@@marcelhalza6916Svea is the name of the area where Svearna lived sweden is the kingdom of svearna, sweden is "Svearnas Rike" which after a while became "Sverige".
Svearna is the name of the people who lived in modern day southern sweden
@@SwedishDrunkard5963 Alright, but how did that area got its name. Why it is called Svea ? Land got the name from people and people got the name from the same Land?
Landsgränsen hade en annan betydelse före EU´s existens.
Gillar att vi bara får hela jävla Norge av Danmark 😂😂😂
Tekniskt sett fick vi inte Norge. När Norge gjorde sig självständigt gick armen över och tog det. Det finns en anledning varför vi räknar att vårt sista krig utfördes år 1814
Norway was struck hard by the black death there was almost no Norwegians left to defend previously conquered terretories thats why it got married into Danmark and why it lost so Much land. There where around 150 000 Norwegians left to rule and defend norway iceland Grenland and the Islands so it fell. Around 300 000 people died from the black death and our royal male Line died in war.
Dags för ett nytt krig mot Ryssland, Danmark och Norge helst samtidigt då och norra Polen och Tyskland också va?
😉
Nej! Jag är glad till vår nuvarande hållning.
Men Nato?
Den tål att fundera på.
Carsten
Denmark and Norway vs Sweden and Finland
Vad sägs som nej tack, vi tycker om er också grannländer, men vi är inte intresserade av att slåss.
Väck inte den björn som sover.
luminoustarisma Jag tror Magnus bara ville förenkla videon med glimten i ögat
maybe Sweden Norway and Denmark got more in common :D Greetings from Finland, we have been busy during the couple hundred of years building back our language and culture :D
@@ristusnotta1653 The Swedish, Norwegian and Danish languages might be more similar, but Finland, or rather Suomi will always be a part of Sweden (in heart and soul). We love you and always will. Like a caring older sibling we are always keeping a watchful eye on the antics of our little brother to the east but we need to let you do your own thing so you can grow up to fulfill your potential. I am Swedish but parts of my ancestry are from Finland aswell. 🇸🇪❤️🇫🇮 Rakastan Suomea ikuisesti!
@@Djuuugarn i dont think the feeling is mutual in Finland 😂
I can't understand anything