No, it's not impressive. Let it go for 200-300km on highway and check again. When battery goes down it will consume 7-8L/100km. In city driving, with regeneration its still worse than bev.
@@Edukacyjny_pa-troll It's a MHEV car. It can't go purely electric, the small electric motor inside the gearbox just helps when the car starts from 0 km/h, or at small accelerations. It's just a 48V system. Nothing will drain after 200-300kms because this system isn't working with higher speeds. On the other video it averages 6.9 liters/100km with 140km/h, so it's pretty impressive for this car's size, and with a V6 3.3l engine.
@@Edukacyjny_pa-trolldriving on highway without regeneration is far more efficient. But within reasonable speed. Driving at 140kph is much less efficient then 80kph.
Me and my CX-30 Skyactive-X with 186HP and 6MT and FWD get also between 5,1.5,7. In the summer time around 5,2 and Winter Time around 5.5L for 100km. I only drive short ranges around 22km.
In long term this start-stop system in combination with diesel engine will cause a lot of issues with carbon built up in EGR valve, exhaust and intake valves and your particle filter failure.
Your mentality is completely wrong. This will save you 15.000 euros in fuel at 100.000km. Plus this is completely different system it uses electric motor for starting the diesel engine too. And the engine is designed to be on and off.
This is simply amazing.
Those mpg figures are so impressive, thank you.
I wish the United States would bring this awesome diesel to the states. This fuel consumption is fantastic.
that is extremely impressive isnt it?
No, it's not impressive. Let it go for 200-300km on highway and check again. When battery goes down it will consume 7-8L/100km. In city driving, with regeneration its still worse than bev.
@@Edukacyjny_pa-troll It's a MHEV car. It can't go purely electric, the small electric motor inside the gearbox just helps when the car starts from 0 km/h, or at small accelerations. It's just a 48V system. Nothing will drain after 200-300kms because this system isn't working with higher speeds. On the other video it averages 6.9 liters/100km with 140km/h, so it's pretty impressive for this car's size, and with a V6 3.3l engine.
@@marcellbagi6345 watch the video and write your comment again.
@@marcellbagi6345 It's inline 6
@@Edukacyjny_pa-trolldriving on highway without regeneration is far more efficient.
But within reasonable speed. Driving at 140kph is much less efficient then 80kph.
Diesel > EV
It's literally both. Diesel hybrid
if you pay attention on rpm
you can see how many time motor go to zero
Rewelacja. Szkoda, że samochód typowo po japońsku przeciętny
Great video! Will we see an AWD version in the same test?
Thank you :) AWD version is in my plan :)
Would consumption of an AWD be not very different? What do you think? :)
Czemu już nie ma twoich polskich komentarzy ? Były bardzo fajne
W formie audio? Może kilka filmów je miało, najwyżej.
I get max 5.1-5.5l per 100 km woth my petrol mild hybrid mazda 3.
Me and my CX-30 Skyactive-X with 186HP and 6MT and FWD get also between 5,1.5,7. In the summer time around 5,2 and Winter Time around 5.5L for 100km. I only drive short ranges around 22km.
I wish I could give you 10 likes for this video.
What is the price of this driven Mazda?
jaki wychodzi zasieg przy takim spalaniu?
Zbiornik paliwa ma pojemność 58 litrów.
@@1001cars i to rozumiem.
Ponad 1400 km zasięgu? Nowe, nie znałem 😮
Raczej ponad 1600 :)
@@1001cars kosmos.
In long term this start-stop system in combination with diesel engine will cause a lot of issues with carbon built up in EGR valve, exhaust and intake valves and your particle filter failure.
Please explain how it will affect the engine
It will not. Engine was not built by Pat and Mat.
Just because it happened to some other diesels doesn't mean that it will happen to this one. This is completely different concept.
Big engine+very low HP. Just don't drive it in town
Those start stop cycles are bad for your wallet 😅 just wait and see, save now cry later...
As if the manufacturer doesn't design the components with start/stop in mind...
This is not a car from 2003
@@tony973 in 2003 they didnt have particle filter so it would have lasted muuuuuch longer
diesel cars had back then particle filters fyi @99a21
Your mentality is completely wrong. This will save you 15.000 euros in fuel at 100.000km. Plus this is completely different system it uses electric motor for starting the diesel engine too. And the engine is designed to be on and off.