you prolly dont care but does anybody know a tool to get back into an Instagram account?? I stupidly lost the password. I would appreciate any assistance you can offer me.
This lady needs to stop interrupting the professor whilst he was speaking...and her questions also could’ve been a little more intelligent and not just mere repetition of herself
最关键的一句话翻译错误。18:03 We are increasingly marginal to this whole globalisation trend，不是“欧美在全球化趋势下日益边缘化”，而是“欧美在全球化中的戏份越来越少”。因为理解错误，之后一整段话的翻译都陷入了混乱。他说的是供应链分化，高端制造业随着自动化技术的进步而回流欧美，这显然不是“欧美在加速边缘化”。翻译很明显有赶工的痕迹。
About COVID-19： Stage 1: We say nothing is going to happen. Stage 2: We say something may be about to happen, but we should do nothing about it. Stage 3: We say maybe we should do something about it, but there's nothing we can do. Stage 4: Maybe there is something we could have done,but it is too late now.
US response: I don’t think there’s a need for us to...uhhh ok to be safe let’s just...errr I think we need to do something actu...FUCK! What should I do what should I do...???
Ian Goldin is very well versed in global affairs in general, international politics and economic development, his speech is well balanced, unbiased and very enlightening. Sadly the BBC interviewer does not even allow him to complete his sentences.
Good prof, well read and well spoken. I wish there are more academics and experts as such studying, observing and resolving global issues. We all now live in a very small village where everyone's nerves and skins are on the same edgy table.
so many of you complain about the host interrupting. Hardtalk is different from the most one to one interviews in that the host is expected to challenge viewpoints of guest speakers, not letting the guest to drift off or sidestep. this is the unique style of this program.
@@Lark.Z yeah. haha. the reason why the hostess interrupt the professor is the west interest group do not allow the average people know how incapable they are of in term of dealing with the emergency and how great the Chinese govt are doing on dealing with the emergency. haha
IAN GOLDLIN, I should say he is a really professional and wise Professor. I wish the political leaders could really look at the opinion he shared here.
when the interviewer try to find sth that the guest want to hide or cover, he can be rude to break the sentence. But if that's not the case, that means the interviewer want to sell his own opinion to the audience. That is not an interview, just a quarrel.
The professor is 100% right. Dow has been jumping for 3 days at the same rate as confirmed cases have. Stock market is roaring while sizeable morgues are being built in NY, shortage of med supplies keeps getting worse, and med staff gets infected. Does any of these make sense?
Even though l've NOT quite finished watching this interview you were/are with Professor Ian Goldin of Oxford University - l can't stop myself saying he is a man of true knowledge & wisdom to deliver his analytical views on all the unprecedented developments & events of the world for giving out his valuable comments that had/have been based on his attentive observation on all the movements of the world! Good health & long live him, the world's longevity really relies on people like him for true guidance!!!
I was so discouraged by the interviewer's style of interview I stop less than halfway through the video, to give myself a break I scroll down to the comments section and realized I'm not the only one.
This is exactly what happened when countries followed WHO's advises in early stage, and of course, WHO seems to beleive whatever China want it to beleive.
I would like to ask the BBC, is it the standard routine of your host to interrupt someone else ’s speech or is it just an intentional operation against a voice that differs from yours?
BBC is hugely benefit by globalisation, people who work for the BBC are the most advocate and promote the idea of globalisation. That’s why she can’t work it out the link between this Pandemic and globalisation. Plus BBC is loosing its Mutual political position.
@@lavoxii why do you only look at the negative side globalization from a Pandemic. Globalization is not the cause of the Pandemic, but is a cure. Globalization does not only mean people travel around the world, it also means we are able to get to know one another better, respect and share our thoughts to build a better world. We'll get what we sow. We've been through a difficult time ever since we started to suspect and confront against globalization. Brexit, America first, "Great walls" and tariffs, none of these benefits the majority of our human being. Why is it so hard to inspire the west to realize we are in one world?
@@andrewyuan9278 I agree your positive points of globalization also see the negative side of it. Since you list all the good sides, now it's time to also know the bad side. Yes, globalization did contribute big to this corona virus spread worldwide. Yes, it also made super rich people super super super rich because they can exploit the cheapest labor globally and sell at the highest price globally. I am for people learn and respect other countries culture, but I am totally against open border!!! Open border can bring good stuff also bring disease and crime. My point: be balanced! countries should learn from each other, so they respect each other, but please please every country should protect country border like China. china does a good job on guarding the border, china is not for open border, china has the hardest immigration policy, China welcomes investment, but to become Chinese citizen, very hard. Good job china! western countries should learn from China.
Just let him talk, what the hell?
it's just the style of BBC
what is wrong with that woman？ show no respect at all
The host is very annoying, keeps talking over the guest.
Totally
Rename the program to “Interrupting Talk”?
As others have commented, the host should let Dr. Goldin finished his sentences, but not cut off his talk.
BBC do this quite often, especially when the other person's opinion is opposite
The lady a lot of times just didn’t allow the guy to finish his sentence...
she just want to control his expression that something bad for audiences to know，even god damn truth for everyone to know it
Which is rude
She tries to show shes "hard"
It's a feature of hardtalk： an impolite host .
That’s what BBC commentators do
No wonder this is called hardtalk. It's actually very hard to talk.
你们是不是只在看字幕啊……白字幕确实把黄字幕盖住了。但是主持人基本是在补充或者确认啊……
@@southstarjj 主持人经常打断对话，因为她只想得到自己想要的答案，得到了就下一个问题，完全单向的“talk”
you prolly dont care but does anybody know a tool to get back into an Instagram account??
I stupidly lost the password. I would appreciate any assistance you can offer me.
@Eden Jaxon instablaster ;)
Lady, pls let the professor talk. Don’t interrupt !
the name of the show describe the show well
She's very rude. No wonder it's hard to talk for the guests.
I am sad to tell you the media in HK is even worse...
Hence the name "Hard Talk"
@@happyhappy2164 I know.
Curry mans straight talk is garbage
This lady needs to stop interrupting the professor whilst he was speaking...and her questions also could’ve been a little more intelligent and not just mere repetition of herself
Although it is quite hard to predict how World would going on? Even for top professor. But this professor is a high level scholar.
这篇访谈非常精彩，我的英语不行，直接看BBC这样的节目完全不懂说些什么，现在有了字幕版非常好，谢谢！
_ k johnny 真要打倒共产党了，十几亿难民涌入周边各国，台湾首当其冲估计你妈会被某些难民强奸致死，傻逼东西。
_ k johnny 就你们那帮草莓兵三十度就不出操，没有任何战略纵深还想打倒共产党，痴人说梦 ，一帮井底之蛙
@@__-jf3sk 还说这种屁话呢？不被骂难受？
Georgic Ventactor 就大陆这帮草包兵，还想翻天。
@@__-jf3sk 别人反共还是有理有据。像你这样泼妇骂街一样回去好好读书在出来行不行
This is how the real elites different from the normal people. Well said, professor!
这个教授水平真的很高……
FakeMarcJames 是主持人的水準太低⋯
@@陳彥婷-k8s 我认为主持人也还蛮好的哎
主持人太垃圾
Agree he is quite brilliant !
@@陳彥婷-k8s 主持人不是各領域的專家，頂多能控制現場，和操作風向
这教授可以啊，没有意识形态枷锁，听起来就是很舒服。
苏吴 我記得他是牛津大學的教授
@@morganma3038 標題有寫
Very balanced.
主要是我们一上来就看见一堆人用意识形态歧视我们，遇到个没歧视的反而感觉温暖
标题有错误的引导，并没有体现出教授的真实建议。
最关键的一句话翻译错误。18:03 We are increasingly marginal to this whole globalisation trend，不是“欧美在全球化趋势下日益边缘化”，而是“欧美在全球化中的戏份越来越少”。因为理解错误，之后一整段话的翻译都陷入了混乱。他说的是供应链分化，高端制造业随着自动化技术的进步而回流欧美，这显然不是“欧美在加速边缘化”。翻译很明显有赶工的痕迹。
合影合影
哪里都能挑出东西～你这汉J定会留名，当你年迈面对人生结尾的时候，希望你能坦然面对安心！
@@Jack-ml8dn 你翻着墙骂人汉奸？？？习近平准你翻墙的吗傻逼
由于目前欧美各国的环保成本，我觉得制造业回流欧美发达国家的可能性很小。外加这次病毒，消费降级，成本控制也会被重视。剩下的就是人工智能加机器人转型的制造业，是需要大量工程师和程序员的。能够满足条件的也就中美吧。
關鍵物資一定要在自己的國家生產，不能繼續把中國當成製造業中心了。
just let him talk. It’s so rude to stop him. And obviously he has points and you dont
恐懼不算慘，最慘的是因無知產生的過度樂觀，再看目前世界上所謂的專家仍對這個新病毒一知半解。
W
我覺得是歐美專家對中國、香港專家對病毒所認識的寄以懷疑的態度。甚麼無病徵傳播，像在美國，他們終於發現了，才建議人帶口罩。
高傲自負，自作孽。自己攞嚟衰。有幾多老年人、高危群體因為他們政府的防疫政策而白白犧牲了？
最pk的是這些歐美國家帶頭搞到全世界淪陷。
@@Psm139 欧美不建议戴口罩还有一个原因是口罩真的不够，如果政府开始建议戴口罩，很多人都会拿不到口罩，导致更大的民愤。。。。
June Shen
是的，我在美国医院工作。一开始看致死率并没有觉得真有那么可怕，很多媒体和专业也并没有重视。所以一月时我自己也是没觉得会变成这么严重。
但是三月中刚开始学校停课的时候，CDC还是在说戴口罩没有用，而且说在医院也不用带口罩预防，我就觉得事情有点不对了。因为正常情况，哪怕怀疑病人是普通流感，在检测结果回来之前，或者觉得有传播风险，我们都需要带口罩的。所以当时还是挺震惊的，而且开始重新使用N95，一个来回用，以前说是四小时换，但其实一般我们每次出病房都直接扔，再进去再拿新的。流感是Droplet precaution，戴普通医用；肺结核一类是airborne precaution，戴N95。但是到医护戴N95的时候，CDC还在说只是droplet。
有一说一，我倒觉得这主持人挺不错的，一直在引导着专家从宏观角度的高谈阔论到微观层次的更接地气的生活逻辑上。让人们理解到经济危机不仅仅是新闻里一样的字面数据，而是生活上的方方面面。
我也觉得，主持人提的问题难道不是很多人想问的问题吗？
@@alexwong2618 不是他問得不好 而是他一直打斷受訪者，積極提問卻不聽到最後。
@@hyac8999 算是这节目的特色了，引导归引导 抢话可没意思，采访这位专家也都还好，采访政治家的时候才叫一个激烈
Alex Wong 对，主持人是正常的，叫兽是洗地的。国际机场造成生化危机？什么逻辑？国际机场出现多少年了？
@@alexwong2618 没觉得，只觉得主持人问的都是理想的状态，感觉主持人像洗地的。
牛津教授客观，公正，富有预见性和远见性！
She should let him talk. Stop interrupting
About COVID-19：
Stage 1: We say nothing is going to happen.
Stage 2: We say something may be about to happen, but we should do nothing about it.
Stage 3: We say maybe we should do something about it, but there's nothing we can do.
Stage 4: Maybe there is something we could have done,but it is too late now.
姚晶 That's not said or did by "we", but Trump.
Yes minister, yes prime minister
US response: I don’t think there’s a need for us to...uhhh ok to be safe let’s just...errr I think we need to do something actu...FUCK! What should I do what should I do...???
exactly what trump have been doing
教授可以啊，说的很好。很客观！
但是這主持人就非常不專業了
Ian Goldin is very well versed in global affairs in general, international politics and economic development, his speech is well balanced, unbiased and very enlightening. Sadly the BBC interviewer does not even allow him to complete his sentences.
Good to hear many questions and doubts, which makes me to think and swift from different sides.
希望不只一种声音，也希望团结应对这次灾难，经济扶持方面可以多多考虑一下失业的人们。
美国🇺🇸一想要一种声音，那就是背后的资本集团说话！其他人做好鱼肉任人宰割的准备！🌝
@@ahri8516 比不上某大国 训诫医生不说 到现在还删文章呢XD
AleXaNDeR LeE 有一说一，言论控制都在搞，没有谁的屁股干净
AleXaNDeR LeE“我曾经担任美国中央情报局局长，我们撒谎、我们欺骗、我们偷窃。我们还有一门课程专门教这些，这才是美国不断探索进取的荣耀”这是你的大米国国务卿亲口说的
@@alexanderlee8535 还给自己赞，恶心。
主持人可不可以对牛津教授放尊重一点，打断次数太多了，什么访谈都能强行卡成political propaganda。
毕竟狗改不了吃屎
我觉得挺好的，不断的在榨干教授内心的想法，刺激教授的反应，让教授说出真正的想法。
這是hard talk. 不是單方面採訪。
這教授的理論好天真。
节目效果……这个节目就这样，每次都这样，大家喜欢看。
教授說的一切都是將會發生的問題😱真的值得該警惕起來。別老是寄望疫苗生產起來的時間期做錯誤的抗戰…🙄搶救基層為主!
Good prof, well read and well spoken. I wish there are more academics and experts as such studying, observing and resolving global issues. We all now live in a very small village where everyone's nerves and skins are on the same edgy table.
If she want to do all the talking, why conduct this interview. So annoying
let him talk and let him finish his sentence. we want to hear him not your interrupting and jumping ahead of him.
基本上她都不让嘉宾说完话 真是“Hard talk ”
Dong Chen 你說得對，但我覺得這都是小事，而且很多主持人都這樣，有點刻意展顯群眾的歇斯底里和無知。美中不足的反面是，我們可以感謝有她，才有了這個訪談。
香港的媒體更離譜, 這個主持相對地比香港的好多了。
心疼教授为了把话讲完，一次不行还要两次提升语速，到最后都快成念绕口令了，教授太难了
It's hard to talk
@@chickenflying3737 是讲上瘾了2333
I wonder why this is not posting on the BBC Hardtalk channel or any other BBC channels? 🤔
Can BBC ask this host to STOP interrupting ? having a headache listen through, the professor is making good insight
Well remember name of this program is call Hard Talk, so she is supposed to make it hard for him to talk. LOL.
我觉得这是非常好的一次对话。主持人也做得很好。她既需要控场又需要采访，有时候要加速节目进度，有时需要为观众解释注释，有时候需要临时增加提问，有时候需要给对话一个总结，这所有的事情，她该做的都做了，而且节奏有条不紊。这是一场信息充沛的深度对话，为了保证节目质量，她当然要时不时打断。她对嘉宾的引导和提问也没有掉入意识形态的对立里面去，即使是在提问“中国训诫医生”，也让嘉宾有充分的时间为中国做合理适当的解释并且肯定中国人民和政府为抗疫做的贡献，最后还能落脚到一个更大的，更广泛议题是，并且用正向的能力来呼吁和引导观众，所以我觉得至少这一场，主持人非常棒。她不这样，这么短的时间里就会有很多废话。而且，看嘉宾，我想他并不觉得被冒犯了。这个女主持真的很棒。嘉宾和主持很有默契，而且专业水平在一个层次上。同时都保持了客观。
教授说的很好，在理性管理和客观分析上，不亏是老牌资本主义曾经的日不落帝国。
打打嘴炮而已
@@dapangzi1998 您連打嘴炮都不配
so many of you complain about the host interrupting. Hardtalk is different from the most one to one interviews in that the host is expected to challenge viewpoints of guest speakers, not letting the guest to drift off or sidestep. this is the unique style of this program.
There is always an interviewer trying to be smart but counter productive.
全球化與發展專家伊恩·戈爾丁（Ian Goldin）分析的真透彻。是个智者，点赞。希望各个国家领导人能够看到这个节目。
The slogan of the program:Hard to see,Hard to say,welcome to HardTalk
and hard to believe.
@@Lark.Z yeah. haha. the reason why the hostess interrupt the professor is the west interest group do not allow the average people know how incapable they are of in term of dealing with the emergency and how great the Chinese govt are doing on dealing with the emergency. haha
约翰逊：你们不呆在家，我就和你们玩群体免疫
閉嘴，武漢病毒
閉嘴啊
@@陳韓劇-d8x 玻璃心碎了？
哈哈哈，真是服了，真是一条好狗啊
@@陳韓劇-d8x 脑瘫
Until today, the interviewer still uses the word "Spanish flu", even though it has been confirmed that originated in the United States.
1:12 explained, the troops returned home from overseas.
@@dcldc123 he couldn't read English. Forgive him.
这个教授讲的很有道理，句句都在点上，目前疫情的快速传播也是全球化带来的必然结果，但全球化又是一个不可逆转的潮流，未来会寄希望于全球国际的亲密合作，制定好规则大家一起遵守。很高明
This is an interview, the lady host needs to know her credentials and stop interrupting.
Very thought-provoking interview. Ian Goldin is arguably one of the wisest experts I have seen in years.
这位才是英国专家中的精英！但BBC中文还是断章取义，教授那么多好的观点却把一点点担忧的言论拿出来当标题。
而且专家的意思是世卫缺乏有效的资源和支持来开展工作，他们起的这个标题给人感觉好像最支持世卫的中国成了操纵世卫的幕后黑手
BBC网站充满偏见，该封。
@@azuren422 語言本就有引導性, 但BBC最少可以把原話放出來, 只怕就有人看了標題就去做文章. BBC的取態不好, 但仍是可以接受, 大家警惕一下就是!
BBC比CNN，NT之流好的一点就是虽然说话避重就轻阴阳怪气但至少不会瞎编
媒体都需要抓眼球的标题，也是无奈。
I don’t know what you guys are on about. She is amazing! Covered so many interesting points in such a short talk. 句句干货！
全都说到了点上，很有见地的教授。
Jupiter heaven 确实，还是教授比较理性啊。官员更多还是政治
很有意思，代表的一種經濟增長速度共同努力負責。
牛津教授水平高。他也提到了CCP并不会因为世纪大瘟疫来自中国而会改正自己所作所为，反而会因此得益。也许欧美会加速将工作带回本土用机器人干活来对抗全球化吧。
IAN GOLDLIN, I should say he is a really professional and wise Professor. I wish the political leaders could really look at the opinion he shared here.
Thumb up to the professor.
這是一位智者，主持人不斷打斷，但教授依然和顏悅色講解
The lady like talking very much, more than the man join the show.
BBC为数不多的好节目。
这位女士假装专业 但其实她什么都不懂
对头
赞同
哇⋯這位來賓很中立客觀很值得讓人尊重。
The only thing that human being learned from history, is WE NEVER LEARN ANYTHING FROM HISTORY. The end....
非常好
when the interviewer try to find sth that the guest want to hide or cover, he can be rude to break the sentence.
But if that's not the case, that means the interviewer want to sell his own opinion to the audience.
That is not an interview, just a quarrel.
The professor is 100% right. Dow has been jumping for 3 days at the same rate as confirmed cases have. Stock market is roaring while sizeable morgues are being built in NY, shortage of med supplies keeps getting worse, and med staff gets infected. Does any of these make sense?
這主持人怎麼一直打斷來賓講話🙄
BBC惯例，他们总是这样，傲慢。不管对面是国家领导人(新加坡印度裔总理)，还是国家总统(非洲总统)，企业家(马云)，还是研究专家(忘了谁)，反正BBC主持人的插话打断给我印象深刻
bbc 风格
@@albertkent4220 之前我记得有个男主持人，邀请的好像是中国驻英大使。谈论的好像是香港局势，大概半年前香港闹的时候。那个打断是真的扯淡，抛出一个问题，人家回答半句，或者观点、例子刚讲到一半，然后直接说一句我们时间有限，再转移话题。真的恶心到了。
节目的名字已经证明了一切： Hard Talk
Yifan He 哈哈哈感觉是hard to talk
Even though l've NOT quite finished watching this interview you were/are with Professor Ian Goldin of Oxford University - l can't stop myself saying he is a man of true knowledge & wisdom to deliver his analytical views on all the unprecedented developments & events of the world for giving out his valuable comments that had/have been based on his attentive observation on all the movements of the world! Good health & long live him, the world's longevity really relies on people like him for true guidance!!!
有文化的人就是不一样，全说到点子上了。
赵泽林 马后炮谁不会
@@0618668506 要不你上
教授一直強調「反省」、「檢視」系統，非常貼切！系統失靈，多少英雄白白犧牲而已！
赵泽林 中国人也很有文化的，BUT...
赵泽林 我也聽出來了⋯⋯因為中共看準了WHO財務因難，所以用錢控制各成員國⋯於是慘絶人寰的事就發生了，這個組織真的該下課了。
非常hard的访谈，非常犀利的提问，非常有深度和广度的回答！赞！
教授的语言听起来是不错的，有舒服感。 至于主持人有点失望。。。。。
一个在打官腔 一个在panic asking questions 英国已经不是当年的英国了
@@brucepei2960 嘉宾很中肯了，说出事件最坏结果 但究竟怎么走向得看政府措施（意思是政府得给点力 不然重现经济危机）事实上西方用政治正确、意识形态洗脑，让普通人都失去了思考能力，但凡有悖于主流宣传的 都会被挂上政治不正确批判 这并无益于解决问题
who else as BBC interviewer does not interrupt her or his interviewees ? I have not found one.
语言是门艺术，佩服教授和记者
I was so discouraged by the interviewer's style of interview I stop less than halfway through the video, to give myself a break I scroll down to the comments section and realized I'm not the only one.
还是一位很有自己观点的老先生：中国不会因为李文亮的死而对信息公开方面有所改变；中国为了保护自己和世界遭到了重击；说的挺好。
Pipi Lu 我觉得这次到县的信息公开做得相当好。不过确实不是因为李文亮之死而改变的
讲得非常好👍非常理智
Let him finish his words PLEASE!
She intended to force him to answer those questions that he said I don't know many times already. It's fun.
主持人就是在一定的时候打断… 我听到教授说中国为避免疫情在国内和国际上传播而导致经济重创，它赶紧切换话题…
兄弟没必要这么敏感，我认为bbc蛮公正的，报道也切合实际，分析也很准确。
@@bowenyang973 钓鱼🎣？
我猜你想聽的應該是中國是全世界的救世主這類的話吧?這個在全世界都看不到你放心，只有一個地方這麼認為，沒錯，就是中國，如果牆外令你覺得刺耳，你應該回到牆內，繼續聽國內媒體的洗腦
@@d86123 楼主说的是”为避免疫情而导致经济重创”就被你等同于要yy“中国是全世界救世主”，不愧是打繁体字的，脑回路都这么不一样👍
@@bowenyang973 有公正的也有不公正的，这个得个案分析。但多一种声音总是有用的。
I don’t know what you guys are about. She is amazing!
BBC中文竟然报道了一次这么客观的节目，很赞同这位教授，不亏是牛津大学，教授水平吊打台湾百分之九十九上节目的教授😂
忽局 战 咋不说吊打中国百分之百的教授？！
@@skyhighlucky8476 哈哈哈哈哈
不然怎么会有迷惑性，就是时不时的正常一下
只要疫情再延续3个月，几乎所有领域的消费需求都会严重下降，但是日用品和一般工业品的供给大概率不会有问题。
This is exactly what happened when countries followed WHO's advises in early stage, and of course, WHO seems to beleive whatever China want it to beleive.
我觉得这位教授说的，我们应该警惕起来，专业人士应该指导民众如何应对！希望大家联手共渡难关！愿世界和平！
繁體字看起來，舒服！
是給台灣及香港人看的。
professional and respectable!
有部分感觉说的像是人类命运共同体的理念呢…
比尔盖茨四年前对于防疫的ted talk更“命运共同体”化。。。。。。简直神预测
@@edward5228 与其说是预测，不如说这一切都是一场计划，他把他要做的事情告诉你就变成预测了，这世界没有巧合，听起来很阴谋论但事实就是这样
Elsonlin Lin 晕，为什么不是智者的预言，很多事情是必然的，就像泡沫总有一天爆，难道看到趋势的人都是始作俑者？
@@elson9516 你可以去看“黃霑先生”寫的東西，有些人是可以看到未來的變化的，或者就是你說的他預測未來，但是有巧合的事實迎合了他們的預測。
其实这个理念在古代 不论中外都有思想家提出过，然而人类是自私的 国家更是，不然早就能星际殖民了
非常明理的教授世界多点像他一样就好了。
主持人似乎想要什么答案，一种很确切的答案，但专家只是在分析，不着急下结论
Bob Ma 主持人照本宣科，这专家有点东西
专家，马后炮谁不会。真是专家，为啥不提早防疫呢，瞎扯吹牛马后炮，哪个国家专家都一样。
@@johnnyfeng2139 問題您連事後諸葛都不配當
@@johnnyfeng2139 其實也有些專家是真材實料，早有先見之明洞察先機，只是你們當初沒太多人願意聆聽而已...😀
@@johnnyfeng2139 還真有許多人很多年前就提過了，NASA整天說會有隕石下來你聽嗎？
标题有点误导，但吸引我看完了。我的理解，教授认为全球化是不可逆，亚洲成为经济增长中心，但管理系统需要升级，例如世卫组织需要资源。最后的肘碰代替握手非常好。
可惜这个🐷一般的主持人根本听不懂教授的话
世卫失去领导力不仅是钱的问题，也是这个时代大家失去了对于权威的信任，甚至权威们自己也在检视自己之前所信奉的教条理论是否还跟得上时代，总之这是一个全球思想观念大分解大重建的时代。看看世卫组织的情况吧：一个非洲人领导着一个白人价值观为主导的全球组织对抗疫中的中国模式感到巨大震撼。
譚德賽任職之前早在自己國家有隱蔽瘧疾的前例了 那他怎麼上的？這得問共產黨了。
Fukinrinstain Alk 呵，要是只看你们这些脑残言论还真以为中共已经成为世界霸主拳打欧美脚踩日韩呢，共产党在国际组织里只手遮天的话美国爸爸呢？看着共产党这么肆无忌惮一点招都没有？话又说回来，别说WHO这类国际组织没有用，要是真没用的话空心菜会天天喊着中共打压不让参与WHO？
@@AboveYourCap 你的回复跟人家的发言根本不在一个思想层次上。“共产党好坏坏，人家好讨厌”，拜托你们拿出点水平来好吗？看到党的批评者们不争气的样子，我手脚冰凉浑身发抖眼泪不争气的流下来了，中国还会好吗？
TheAlexfrom1 白癡嗎？WHO有用，是譚德賽沒用，收共產黨錢了還想公正發言？腦殘了？
tyer _ 你也智障，樓主說WHO失去領導力不只是錢，我說譚德賽早有前科失去公信力不意外，要意外就得問共產黨怎麼幫他選上的。別腦殘了，回家讀點書吧。
Professor! Intelligent , unbiased, professional, and nice manner. She needs to learn a lot, especially how to respect others.
The name is hardtalk. It's really hard to talk !
很喜欢这教授，谢谢！
这位主持人充分证明了为何缺乏有效的回合制陈述，理智的言论无法有效地广播……
Juanwu Lu 這節目叫 hard talk, 了解一下
打断有点太厉害了。感觉被采访人的观点没有铺陈开。
是很难说，如果连一个观点都没办法说清楚，这样流于形式的节目没有任何意义，除了宣扬你大英帝国的狗皮膏药
I would like to ask the BBC, is it the standard routine of your host to interrupt someone else ’s speech or is it just an intentional operation against a voice that differs from yours?
wear mask please！I beg you guys to wear masks.一定要戴口罩啊！这是呼吸道传播的疾病，这不是伤寒！洗手作用不是很大的！wear mask！washing hands is less helpful.God bless all human beings.
對教授的公正客觀讚。主持人企圖帶風向也沒影響他。
当嘉宾试图肯定中国抗疫取得的成就时 主持人甚至都不愿意听他把话说完
没错，说明这个主持人太没素质了
因为是bbc
@kkll goopp 急了？怎么那么像只急了的野狗呢
@kkll goopp 真相与事实往往令人难以直视
伊恩，各尔丁先生您的回答非常精彩，能为全世界人民和世界经济着想
真是难能可贵的西方人。👍
Why is it so hard for her to understand globalisation makes the spread of virus faster....
BBC is hugely benefit by globalisation, people who work for the BBC are the most advocate and promote the idea of globalisation. That’s why she can’t work it out the link between this Pandemic and globalisation. Plus BBC is loosing its Mutual political position.
@@lavoxii why do you only look at the negative side globalization from a Pandemic. Globalization is not the cause of the Pandemic, but is a cure. Globalization does not only mean people travel around the world, it also means we are able to get to know one another better, respect and share our thoughts to build a better world. We'll get what we sow. We've been through a difficult time ever since we started to suspect and confront against globalization. Brexit, America first, "Great walls" and tariffs, none of these benefits the majority of our human being. Why is it so hard to inspire the west to realize we are in one world?
@@andrewyuan9278 I agree your positive points of globalization also see the negative side of it. Since you list all the good sides, now it's time to also know the bad side. Yes, globalization did contribute big to this corona virus spread worldwide. Yes, it also made super rich people super super super rich because they can exploit the cheapest labor globally and sell at the highest price globally. I am for people learn and respect other countries culture, but I am totally against open border!!! Open border can bring good stuff also bring disease and crime.
My point: be balanced! countries should learn from each other, so they respect each other, but please please every country should protect country border like China. china does a good job on guarding the border, china is not for open border, china has the hardest immigration policy, China welcomes investment, but to become Chinese citizen, very hard. Good job china! western countries should learn from China.
Really don't understand why would the host want to interrupt the guest talk when he is talking in the middle of something important
很客观的教授，希望能通过这次灾难，让人类更团结吧
种族，宗教，政治......人类永远能找到自相残杀的理由，但最可怕的是，谁都确定自己是正确的。
We have to give Mr. Lan Goldin some applauses for bringing us such objective views.
全球化已经到达了一个顶点，如果大部分国家没有达成共识不愿意构成人类文明共同体，那全球化将会倒退
和平实现共同体在现在几乎不可能
全球化不会倒退的，从秦始皇到现在，谁违反这个开放的规则谁将会倒退。
We should not shake our hands, but we can just talk to each other face to face for more than 20 minutes without masks on.
當海嘯已經發生, 才宣佈有海嘯, 是沒有用的
正如,
當大量傳染時, 才宣佈會人傳人, 是沒有用的
當已全球傳播, 才宣佈大流行, 是沒有用的
病毒又不是你家猫猫狗狗，用眼睛能看得到。基本上到了已经大流行的程度才会引起人们的注意，就像意大利的医学专家所说，去年同期10月和11月当地已经有疑似病例，只可惜没人“吹哨”。更没有人想着去检测这是什么病毒，在这吹什么海啸，站着说话不腰疼
这言论说的也太没脑子了
台灣1/3時已經提醒世衛組織會人傳人了，可能我們沒給二十億所以世衛不理我們。
@@金主爸爸錢拿來 我才不要給20億拿話語權，20億我寧願先訂購呼吸器組裝設備XXXXXXXD。
Singapore definitely does not have declining numbers! The number is creasing like hell at the moment.