sr in example one their might be other flowers in the garden.It is possible that the author just wanted to see the part of garden where only roses are present. Is'nt it?
At 14:04 y 2 is correct ,in statement this is not told ,moreover it could be many reasons for withdrawing like west main hi agr war broke out hojae tu b soldiers ko wapis bula liya Jae ga
it puzzled me as well. Does military influence necessarily mean that there is a conflict going on? also, we are not supposed to think or add things on our own. the text doesnot mention any conflict.
@@Bwonetteyes really! I Aldo didn't got the claim number 2nd.. And one thing More about which am confused that if the 3rd claim is not true that war is a thing of past then how we can say that there will not be another spark of conflict within the next 5-10 years??
@@Bwonetteexactly! For instance, there were no Russian's army presence in Ukraine but the conflict did occur. Also it's not mentioned in the context that less military presence would vanish the spark of conflict. So, 2nd claim must be false.
Duaa ye assumption part hai or ap critical thinking ke point of view se soch rhe ho yhan ye btana hai ye jo bnda ya statement hai question ki uski konsi assumption true ho skti or konsi false its simple is that ke kisi ki thinking ko juge krna through claims
Hi, I'm enjoying MDCAT Past Papers at Nearpeer. I'd like you to give it a try too. www.nearpeer.org/entry-test-preparation/free-entry-test-resources/mdcat-past-papers
@@duaafatima6337 lekin hamei door door tak ye nhi sochna out of the box ke usse ye hota coz ham apna if _ then logic yhaaan nhi lagate or paper mei less than 1 min mei krna hota tab confuse ho jao gi agr out of way socha
the statement which is given, for that we have to assume as true. Although its reality or imaginary. because it's a statement of some particular person.
@@tayyabbrao Just go through it again As No soldier physically stationed But Already some present which were stationed in 2000's So Less military presence
Question no 2 Assumption 2 there won't be another spark of conflict within the next 5 to 10 years is Assumption Not Made because it is not implied by the statement.
yes,exactly thats what i was thinking the whole time.there's nowhere written in the text that there wont be any conflict in the next 5 to 10 years.becuz in the text there's just written that negligible military would be present,that doesnt mean that there wont be any conflicts.i'm really really confused!!!!
@@SeharSaleem Don't get confused, Sir shooted video continuously, so it may happen unconsciously in hurry. Your answer to the question is right. Think on your own, think about logic. Sometimes teachers do mistakes too.
Sir Jo soldier wla question hyy Us ki Jo pehli Assumption hyy whan likha hua ky No physically stationed r Text mei Yh baat hy ky kafi soldiers physically stationed thy 2000 mei r 2019 mei kam ho gyyy But physically to hein na beshak kam ho gyyyy
i do not agree with you in the third question i beleive the second statement is not true, there can be a conflict, the western soldiers stationed have nothing to do with that, the conflict can be internal or there can be new upcoming unseen circumstances that may spark a conflict
sr in example one their might be other flowers in the garden.It is possible that the author just wanted to see the part of garden where only roses are present. Is'nt it?
you might be correct but the logic is that the author already knows that the garden to which he is going will be full of roses which implies that no other kinda flowers will be present in the garden to which he has intended to go and thats what the statement implies about.There might be other gardens besides it but we have nothing to do with that and neither they are mentioned in the statement.Thatswhy we have to answer according to the data given in the statement.
@@abbassheryousafzai6099 Assalam u alaikum!! U r right bro but it's a bit confusing ...as stated by Maryam , it might possible that there are some other kinds of flowers in the garden but the author has seen only roses... I mean, we can also assume that there might be many kinds of flowers in the garden but author is going to that side where only roses are grown.... Isn't it so ??..
Sir Allah Paak aap ko es ka ajar de aaameeen!!!💕💕
AMEEN
😎😎😎😎😎😎😎
Sir Allah pak apko es la ajar de ameeeeeeeeeeeen 💕💕💕
sr in example one their might be other flowers in the garden.It is possible that the author just wanted to see the part of garden where only roses are present. Is'nt it?
Thought the same freaking thing
Ya ,same thought
sir these lectures are really helpful kindly make more videos for practice questions of critical thinking
You are good teacher
Jazakullah sir ❤
Ye garden waly question m ye bhi to ho skta hai ky
Wo keh raha ho ky....
Q k mjhe roses pasand hain to is lia main sirf roses hi dkhun ga
Thank you Sir Ammar 🥰
Amazing method of teaching
I understood clearly.
Sir g 1to6 lesson ke lectures bhi send kr de please sir
Please see description. They're uploaded already.
Check channel
Or
Discription
Good
At 14:04 y 2 is correct ,in statement this is not told ,moreover it could be many reasons for withdrawing like west main hi agr war broke out hojae tu b soldiers ko wapis bula liya Jae ga
Because it's written that presumably the amount will decrease in next 5to 10 years therefore there will be no conflict
No military influence doesn't means that There won't be any conflicts sparking in next 5-10 years, aren't they two different things?
it puzzled me as well. Does military influence necessarily mean that there is a conflict going on? also, we are not supposed to think or add things on our own. the text doesnot mention any conflict.
@@Bwonetteyes really! I Aldo didn't got the claim number 2nd.. And one thing More about which am confused that if the 3rd claim is not true that war is a thing of past then how we can say that there will not be another spark of conflict within the next 5-10 years??
@@Bwonetteexactly! For instance, there were no Russian's army presence in Ukraine but the conflict did occur. Also it's not mentioned in the context that less military presence would vanish the spark of conflict. So, 2nd claim must be false.
Yes you are right
Sir rose walay question main jasmine ka zikr nahi hai Sirf rose ka zikr hai .then last assumption true ho ga
Ye questions Kuch Kam aye previous mdcat test me?
Thanks a lot my dear sir
Allah bless you
Thanks a lot Sir
14:00 *another spark of conflict* discuss nai hoya
It should be false
I don't get this point
Please tell me
yes ....i also think so....kionke agr war dubara ho skti h to conflict bhi to ho hi skta😯
I think its false
Thank you so much 💖
15:45
That's exactly what I am doing ☺️😂
السلام علیکم..
Kia haal ha sir???
Sir ap ny kha tha sirf text ko follow krna aur text mein to jasmine mention nhi
Duaa ye assumption part hai or ap critical thinking ke point of view se soch rhe ho yhan ye btana hai ye jo bnda ya statement hai question ki uski konsi assumption true ho skti or konsi false its simple is that ke kisi ki thinking ko juge krna through claims
@@talhaxheikh3227 okkk
claim 1 b wrong ni hua kya??
Ques1
the color of flower is not mentioned in the statement, so for the claim2 it should be *data insufficient*. Explain plz.
These lectures of critical thinking are not good! These are mixing our concepts! A blurred explanation
Thank y sooo much sir
Thank u so much sir 😊
Sir really admire your lectures much better than kips teacher
AGREE
💯
Kips logic is so explanatory
Spark of conflict mean?
Clashes among countries
Sir roses Wala question no 1
Iss Mai claim 1 zaroori TU nhi Sahi hoo... Mtlb us ne Joo flowers dekhy wo roses Hoon lkin aur bhi TU hoo skty hain
Ap nay statement k lehaz say dekhna hai k woh kia assume kar raha hai. Uss ki statemwnt ko true hi lena hai k soh sahi kah raha.
sir past paper mdcat k upload karo please ❤❤
logical reasoning k past paper😶
Hi, I'm enjoying MDCAT Past Papers at Nearpeer. I'd like you to give it a try too. www.nearpeer.org/entry-test-preparation/free-entry-test-resources/mdcat-past-papers
Claim 2 is waja sy wrong hain q ky is ka mtlb hain ky there are also some other flowers in the garden other than red.
Sir hoskta hai usy redcone monochromancy ho aur usy sirf red colour hi nazr ata ho..😑
Thts not biology 😂
@@talhaxheikh3227 😕😕
@@duaafatima6337 sory yr agr bura laga ho jk
@@duaafatima6337 lekin hamei door door tak ye nhi sochna out of the box ke usse ye hota coz ham apna if _ then logic yhaaan nhi lagate or paper mei less than 1 min mei krna hota tab confuse ho jao gi agr out of way socha
hahah phir toh yeh bhi hosakta hai k woh blind ho aor red roses daikhney ki khwaahish krta ho
3rd ka answer A ho ga?
please suggest me any best English teacher
Q.1
The only flowers he will see are roses but how does it mean that they are only roses in the garden?
Isn't it indeterminate?
the statement which is given, for that we have to assume as true.
Although its reality or imaginary.
because it's a statement of some particular person.
@@Abdullah-ok7fp I am considering the same
Stick to the text
no soldiers=military absence
how less m.presence?
same query.
Same question
No soldier physically stationed
But
Already some present which were stationed in 2000's
So
Less military presence
@@komalejaz2972
See this again
No soldier physically stationed
But
Already some present which were stationed in 2000's
So
Less military presence
@@tayyabbrao
Just go through it again
As
No soldier physically stationed
But
Already some present which were stationed in 2000's
So
Less military presence
Question no 2 Assumption 2 there won't be another spark of conflict within the next 5 to 10 years is Assumption Not Made because it is not implied by the statement.
Plz explain 🥺
yes,exactly thats what i was thinking the whole time.there's nowhere written in the text that there wont be any conflict in the next 5 to 10 years.becuz in the text there's just written that negligible military would be present,that doesnt mean that there wont be any conflicts.i'm really really confused!!!!
@@SeharSaleem From which text book this topic is taken? NEARPEER OR SOMEONE ELSE??
@@_raiseyourfaith idk
@@SeharSaleem Don't get confused, Sir shooted video continuously, so it may happen unconsciously in hurry. Your answer to the question is right. Think on your own, think about logic. Sometimes teachers do mistakes too.
Sir Jo soldier wla question hyy Us ki Jo pehli Assumption hyy whan likha hua ky No physically stationed r Text mei Yh baat hy ky kafi soldiers physically stationed thy 2000 mei r 2019 mei kam ho gyyy But physically to hein na beshak kam ho gyyyy
Yes I am. Confused
No soldier physically stationed
But
Already some present which were stationed in 2000's
So
Less military presence
3 and 1
i do not agree with you in the third question i beleive the second statement is not true, there can be a conflict, the western soldiers stationed have nothing to do with that, the conflict can be internal or there can be new upcoming unseen circumstances that may spark a conflict
Agree ....same
Sir ye to bahot confused 🤔 kartee ha
👍👍👍👍👍👍
💖💖💖💖
❤❤❤❤👍👍👍👍👍
First one
1st viewer
Oscar goes to you !
Legends ultra pro max 💯👍😁
sr in example one their might be other flowers in the garden.It is possible that the author just wanted to see the part of garden where only roses are present. Is'nt it?
you might be correct but the logic is that the author already knows that the garden to which he is going will be full of roses which implies that no other kinda flowers will be present in the garden to which he has intended to go and thats what the statement implies about.There might be other gardens besides it but we have nothing to do with that and neither they are mentioned in the statement.Thatswhy we have to answer according to the data given in the statement.
@@abbassheryousafzai6099 Assalam u alaikum!!
U r right bro but it's a bit confusing ...as stated by Maryam , it might possible that there are some other kinds of flowers in the garden but the author has seen only roses...
I mean, we can also assume that there might be many kinds of flowers in the garden but author is going to that side where only roses are grown.... Isn't it so ??..