Troubled Debt Restructuring Modification of Terms

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 15 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 16

  • @2516westbrownstreet
    @2516westbrownstreet 2 місяці тому +1

    Once again, you have explained a legendary complex subject in such a way that is understandable and conceptually enlightening. The Farhat lectures are truly outstanding!! Thank you.

    • @AccountingLectures
      @AccountingLectures  2 місяці тому

      You're very welcome. Please check my website for more resources: farhatlectures.com/

  • @harshitgirdhar5737
    @harshitgirdhar5737 7 місяців тому +1

    Sir, thanks so much for your lectures, your channel has helped me clear the BEC exam.
    Just a feedback - in some of your videos the voice is a bit low, its manageable though but sometimes its a little challenging. Thanks so much for teaching us the concepts in a simpler way :)

  • @rajashrimahabalesh4867
    @rajashrimahabalesh4867 3 місяці тому +1

    Hello, is there an easier way to calculate the debtor's new interest expense? Because we aren't provided with financial calculators and the calculation is way too lengthy. Thank you sir. And also sir, if the time period is more than 3 it wouldnt be possible to calculate the interest expense % so pls help

  • @Chavez94565
    @Chavez94565 25 днів тому

    I believe that you need to use the post-restructuring effective interest rate for the creditor

  • @stunnerkay9556
    @stunnerkay9556 3 роки тому +1

    This is on point

    • @AccountingLectures
      @AccountingLectures  3 роки тому

      Thank you. Here's my intermediate Accounting course: farhatlectures.pathwright.com/library/?category=Intermediate+Accounting

  • @chaldean3941
    @chaldean3941 2 роки тому

    How did you punch in the discount on new payment based on old rate. The values do not work on my calculator. They do not result in 576,439. This is what I punch in: N-3, I/Y-12, PV=170,827, PMT-0, FV-240,000

    • @weiwu1929
      @weiwu1929 2 роки тому

      I think that might just be a typo. I got the same amount as you had. But the total pv of the new loan also the amortization talk with are the same as what Farhat illustrated.

    • @claire1388
      @claire1388 Рік тому

      I maybe know why you got this number because I made a same mistake. we use the Present Value of 1 dollar table rather than the present value of annuity table. hope that make senses.

  • @weiwu1929
    @weiwu1929 2 роки тому

    Great illustration!! Never would’ve known how to do those amortization tables if I don’t watched your lecture. Thank you so much!

    • @AccountingLectures
      @AccountingLectures  2 роки тому

      Glad it was helpful! Take a tall my courses: farhatlectures.pathwright.com/

  • @Ancin47
    @Ancin47 3 роки тому +1

    Can you address CECL next?

    • @AccountingLectures
      @AccountingLectures  3 роки тому

      Here’s cecl: ua-cam.com/video/ZzDmr24g8Gg/v-deo.html

    • @Ancin47
      @Ancin47 3 роки тому

      @@AccountingLectures thank you!

  • @KarenJoyce-ur5gn
    @KarenJoyce-ur5gn Місяць тому

    Weird that the debtor uses undiscounted cash flow, but creditor has to discount. Also weird that one side (debtor) could have no gain or loss but the other side (creditor) has a loss. Sigh.