Hi Matt, thanks for sharing, watching it has made me think about going back and doing the same exercise, even though it takes time it seems a like a good way to learn from mistakes and a good way of refining your ability to solve the puzzle as it were. I've been betting for about 12 years but don't really have the time to take too much notice of the race as such; the history, form lines, type of horse needed to win/place etc so don't feel as though I'm retaining lessons of the past. On reflection as I write this my betting approach to the gold cup is probably the same to a grade 6 AW race at lingfield 🤦 I really enjoy looking at the data and forming an opinion but I miss some of the qualitative information, as an example I was particularly interested in your insights about the Albert Bartlett during the video. I must remember that for next year! Also, I'd be interested to know more as to why your bets on the non handicap races were so much more accurate? I presume it's more than just the handicappers doing a marvellous job. Great content, keep up the good work 👍
Hi @stephenberne, really sorry for the slow reply. I think geegeez does a fantastic job of coordinating a lot of information in to a few screens' worth of colour-coded visuals - that makes it possible to know so much about a race really quickly. I built it that way because I, like you, have difficulty retaining all the detail knowledge on the form book. Regarding specifics like the Albert Bartlett, it's just one of those races that very often throws a big price so is worth looking in the long grass; I wouldn't be doing that in most races. On non-handicaps vs handicaps at Cheltenham, the handicaps are virtually impossible for a plethora of reasons!
Hi I’ve just found this site and took the trial . I’m looking at laying I was wondering if there was any videos on that or you could give me some pointers to the site to check for lays . Thanks
Hi Andrew, if you watch the videos focused on backing, it's perfectly reasonable to look for 'opposite' types for laying. For example, horses poorly drawn and/or held up on tracks that generally favour front runners; and so on. Good luck. Matt
Hi Matt, thanks for sharing, watching it has made me think about going back and doing the same exercise, even though it takes time it seems a like a good way to learn from mistakes and a good way of refining your ability to solve the puzzle as it were.
I've been betting for about 12 years but don't really have the time to take too much notice of the race as such; the history, form lines, type of horse needed to win/place etc so don't feel as though I'm retaining lessons of the past. On reflection as I write this my betting approach to the gold cup is probably the same to a grade 6 AW race at lingfield 🤦 I really enjoy looking at the data and forming an opinion but I miss some of the qualitative information, as an example I was particularly interested in your insights about the Albert Bartlett during the video. I must remember that for next year!
Also, I'd be interested to know more as to why your bets on the non handicap races were so much more accurate? I presume it's more than just the handicappers doing a marvellous job.
Great content, keep up the good work 👍
Hi @stephenberne, really sorry for the slow reply. I think geegeez does a fantastic job of coordinating a lot of information in to a few screens' worth of colour-coded visuals - that makes it possible to know so much about a race really quickly. I built it that way because I, like you, have difficulty retaining all the detail knowledge on the form book. Regarding specifics like the Albert Bartlett, it's just one of those races that very often throws a big price so is worth looking in the long grass; I wouldn't be doing that in most races. On non-handicaps vs handicaps at Cheltenham, the handicaps are virtually impossible for a plethora of reasons!
Great!
Hi I’ve just found this site and took the trial . I’m looking at laying I was wondering if there was any videos on that or you could give me some pointers to the site to check for lays . Thanks
Hi Andrew, if you watch the videos focused on backing, it's perfectly reasonable to look for 'opposite' types for laying. For example, horses poorly drawn and/or held up on tracks that generally favour front runners; and so on. Good luck. Matt
@@geegeez is there any backing systems available to follow ?
Video image quality only 360p makes it difficult to view the video Matt - Do you have a higher quality copy - Cheers!
Wait a short time, Harry, the video is still processing 👍👍
@@geegeez Ah thanks Matt - Cheers.