Conducting a literature search using PubMed.

[@marytapfuma6917]

This is the best and most straightforward explanation after so many months of confusion. Thank you👏👏

[@alexaruiz3907]

This video ROCKS. I only have 5 weeks to do a literature review for my masters. I've never done one before, so I ended up here to see how to do a literature search.

[@adamfalah3884]

Same but I only have 2 weeks lol

[@ZimeTime1]

Thank you so much! I am a medical student working on a literature search and possible meta-analysis - this video is perfect!

[@ohmid123]

This video taught me all I desperately needed to know. Thank you so much for sharing.

[@drmalik1984]

The Best video i have seen So far. Thanks alot. You Are my hero. Finally i can research in an organised way. God bless you.

[@nomfanelomasiza3145]

You have made my search for articles much easier, thanks you so much❤

[@aamjad2001]

Thank you Elizabeth. Excellent presentation.

[@jakobmohamed645]

Thank you for a great and informative video. I am glad I watched now at the start of my master thesis :)

[@tanimowosunkanmi4028]

This has put an end to all the struggles that i experience in carrying out a scholarly work. Thank you.

[@judithfoster7791]

thank you this is a really useful video for a radiologist who needs to do a literature search on a specific topic.

[@irehbeinq]

Thank you very much for this tutorial!

[@kotavidyasagar9550]

Thank you so much, because I have learnt so many new things from this video

[@AdilKhan88]

This is such an informative video.

[@shravangattu5783]

Appreciate your informative presentation. Thank you.

[@arminzarrintan2461]

Thanks for your helpful and simple explanations.

[@anastasianomikou4096]

Really informative video!

[@jlin8681]

This is very helpful. Thank You!

[@PEDIACTRICCPD]

this was very helpful. thank you

[@DT20245]

good informative literature search topic, well narrated

[@zaphod-42]

Thank you! This video is very helpful!

[@DrVivekJha]

Thank you for such an informative content.Great job.

[@harshitnarula6539]

Quite Informative, Thanks!

[@rohitparkale8148]

Many queries resolved...Thank you!!

[@dr.shoebshaikh4525]

Excellent!!! Awesome explanation. Thanks a lot, Elizabeth S.

[@dickenskowuor9851]

Thanks, this helped me put a presentation together

[@jehangir3997]

Thank you so much!

[@bhaskarborgohain5623]

Wonderful work. Thank you

[@matthiasroth5522]

great information video ! thanks a lot

[@ramayanam100]

Very helpful thanks

[@theofficeofamidwife]

thank you!

[@neyeeisaiah]

Very helpful!

[@israakhaleel832]

Very useful. Thanks

[@fernandmartinsafatle308]

Thank you so much!

[@vamsipriyabalireddy0395]

thank you for information

[@ashrafhosny1110]

Thanks a lot ...very helpful

[@bhaveshgajjar8184]

Very useful

[@yos5177]

terrific video. Thanks alot.
how would you approach searching literature regarding a particular area:
for example I would like to limit my search on otitis media to publications that took place in the country of Israel.
thanks

[@wain560]

Thank you 😇

[@rtx2009]

Thank you

[@iqrasafdar9386]

)how to extrect data in cvs (ecel) file from pubmed

[@samarthajaythakkar3668]

very helpful

[@Q-Bits8]

2 questions related to truncation. Why do you use "Intubation OR intubat*" at 10:00 ? Isn't intubation included in intubat*?
Also, why do I get less results with a search for "Hemodynamic*" than for "Hemodynamics"?

[@unad0rned]

Both questions can be answered by knowing more about automatic term mapping that is used in PubMed. www.nlm.nih.gov/bsd/disted/pubmedtutorial/020_040.html If you search a MeSH heading like intubation or Hemodynamics, you will find more records than doing a keyword search using the asterisk.

[@dr.mohammedal-omrani6177]

Thanks a lot

[@bonaventuredzekem787]

Awsome

[@22symoo]

great

[@22symoo]

good

[@tnt7913]

BTW professionals in the field all suggest not to use pubmed for systematic reviews. And, suggesting to use Wikipedia is unprofessional

[@MCWLibraries]

Thanks for the comment! If you notice, we recommend using Wikipedia to get familiar with a concept. We don't recommend relying solely on this resource for information.
Also, this video is NOT for systematic reviews. We don't market it in that way.

[@ot8479]

Wikipedia!!?? No way, that's really bad advice. I've seen absolutely wrong statements, especially when it comes to research

[@ot8479]

Wikipedia for MSc and PhD research is absolutely wrong. Sorry I don't understand why including such an unreliable source of information