Akbar Was Born In India; How Is He An Invader?
Вставка
- Опубліковано 17 жов 2024
- From Episode 37 of #AskAbhijit.
WATCH FULL EPISODE: #AskAbhijit 37: Indian History ► • #AskAbhijit 37: Indian...
SUBSCRIBE ► www.youtube.co...
SHORT CLIPS CHANNEL ► www.youtube.co...
------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUPPORT THE CHANNEL
------------------------------------------------------------------------
►UPI (G-Pay/PhonePe/Paytm): abhijitchavda@icici
►PayPal: paypal.me/Abhi...
►Become A Member on UA-cam: / @abhijitchavda
------------------------------------------------------------------------
JOIN #AbhijitChavda
------------------------------------------------------------------------
★Discord: / discord
★Twitter: / abhijitchavda
★Instagram: / theabhijitchavda
★Facebook: / theabhijitchavda
★Website:
★Email Inquiries: inquiries.chavda@gmail.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------
#AskAbhijitPodcast
------------------------------------------------------------------------
★Spotify: open.spotify.c...
★Apple Podcasts: podcasts.apple...
★Google Podcasts: podcasts.googl...
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
#AskAbhijitChavda #Abhijit #Chavda #AskAbhijitShow
General Dyer who killed thousands of people in Jalianwallah Bagh, he was also born in India so does that make him an India?
Anyone who contributed to the culture and peoples of india is indian
it does make him indian.
@@shubhampawar3652 yahh but at the time of Akbar there were no india. It was bharat. And we fought with them as a invaders so your logic goes straight out of the window.
This dumb questioner confused between migrants and invaders.
@@hiteshgujarathi4636 exactly ,akbar was invaders becoz of his sins not a case with th kushans
@@Abhimanyu2704 nah lol
It's a shame that such wrong history being taught in our schools in the NCERT textbooks. It's a blessing that ppl like you are shedding some light of truth through your videos. Thank you
Tbh, there's nothing like "wrong history". But I agree with what you said.
It's Fabricated Contorted History!!
@@noobdaddy Tbh I have no idea what do U mean by "there is nothing like wrong history". What's factual is right what's non-factual is wrong.
His videos is not enough. Books must need to be changed... No Option..
It's written by the British-Slave minded Historians under the direction of Western Countries to make us forget our own Dharma and Culture and History.
General Dyer who ordered troops to open fire at innocent people at Jaliwala bagh was also born in India. With this logic british were also indians and we condemn british action because we hate Christianity.
Wow I didn't know that he was born in India.
There are lakhs of Anglo Indians, who call themselves Indians. Descendants of britishers. Should they not be called Indians? And their citizenship revoked? What about Parsis who came from Iran?
@@reckto5024 they have blended in with the Indian culture and aren't opposing other culture,unlike akbar and the Mughal rulers who rejected our culture and 'aggressively' promoted their culture
@@reckto5024 thier is a difference between one who is good for nation and one who is destroying nation
@@reckto5024 anglo indians are mix breeds of Indians and British. Don't try to make false parallels. If a British officer born in India cannot be an Indian then a turk ruler born in India also cannot be an Indian. General dyer is responsible for Jaliwala bagh massacre and Akbar is responsible for chittorgarh fort massacre. Action speaks louder than words.
This channel is a blessing for every indian♥️🇮🇳
If chicken is born in stable , does that make that chicken a horse?😂
Beautifully put 😂 I'm gonna use this from now on 💯
👌
#AskAbhijit Most of the Muslims in our country feel proud of Islamic invasion and Muslim rule. What can we do to maybe reverse this?
simple change history books
when u will read about only Islam then u will feel proud
we are not being taught about Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj
nor many grat kings
@@sarthakkumar8679 but some minister of india r proud that they haven't changed a single word of books
@@sarthakkumar8679 I agree books should be changed, books are to Marx favored, and Socialist.They have portrayed Capitalism as worst model( They actually show Crony Capitalism which is bad)
They are proud of Islamic rule because they believe that it made them Muslim, which is the only path to jannah, hence the Muslim rule was good, no matter what.
Be prepared for Civil war. Every time they say " We ruled over you 800 years" answer like this "Thats why you will now suffer for 80,000" years".
It doesn't matter if you come from outside in this sacred land but depends on how you treat the culture and Civilization of this Noble land. Ahoms came from outside but embraced Indian culture and so does every other invader be it Kushanas, Indo-Scythians, Indo-Bactrians, Indo-Greeks, white Huns etc.
What makes land sacred?
@@deepcvs the belief of the people living on that land.
@@deepcvs
It's ethics and morals.
@@deepcvs positive energy
Actually akbar respected indian culture. But other mughals didn't (except darashokov)
My parents are Bangladesh victim hindu, I am nomosudra sc kashyap gotra Bengali and I born in India and I have home in both sides and I am not fool and I am not pseudo secular. Nomosudra are brahman by orgin but sen kings , British and mughals had tortured us and made us tribal. We were Buddhist as well as brahman. Vernadiwija was based on talent but not by birth.
settle India permanently as BD is dangerous for Hindus.
@@rrrabad1234 only dangerous in west Bengal. But we have ancestor's homes on both sides.
I agree with you.
The continuity of persecution by the legacy of Akbar settles the argument. As long as one harbours the same vendetta towards the inhabitants and their ethos of a land 'One must be considered an 'Invader'.'
Also USA is made by Europeans by exterminating it's native people, while India still has it's different native ethnicities that followed their indigenous hindu faith, Akbar was descendant of invaders while Obama was not and wasn't trying to Spread his foregin saudi faith, rather his parents were mere immigrants to USA,to a land that was already invaded and wiped out of it's native people,Obama parents didn't came into usa with an army and then rule USA as this royal inherited birth right,the fact that someone would even use this as propaganda point shows how ignorant they are.
Describe one event in the recorded history of Akbar's persecution..don't feed on someone else's facts ...read books and judge it for yourself..
@@anuragc1565 The fallacy of modern Historiography is, It's pure reliance on physical evidence like Stone Inscriptions and Written Books. No Historian however courageous will author a book which is displeasing to tyranny of rule. Even if one write's, such books end up in pit fire. Satirical and No-nonsense poet Mir Jafar Zatalli was executed for exposing bestiality and homosexuality in Mughal Courts and one can least expect authentic history to be penned on paper during such times. Since the days of Delhi taken over by invaders all History is 'Hushed Up to suit interests in Books.' So the Books on which modern Historiography purely relies, as only source are not authentic to extent needed.
@@anuragc1565 read how peacefully Akbar the goon massacred 30000 people of Chittorgarh. If you are really ready to have an open mind about the topic you will know and agree that he was nothing but a barbaric invader.
Question is factually wrong.
1. Obama’s mother is Stanley Ann who is an American anthropologist and is born in Kansas, this gave him the eligibility for US citizenship through descent.
2. Obama is himself born in Hawaii. That’s how he was eligible for the highest post in the USA.
Ok example might be alittle incorrect ,
and aabhar, your words will reminds others that none of akbar parents are Indian
@@eee9034 Humayun is from Tajikistani stock and Hamida is from Persian stock. Neither of them are remotely Indian, not even afghan.
Also USA is made by Europeans by exterminating it's native people, while India still has it's different native ethnicities that followed their indigenous hindu faith, Akbar was descendant of invaders while Obama was not and wasn't trying to Spread his foregin saudi faith, rather his parents were mere immigrants to USA,to a land that was already invaded and wiped out of it's native people,Obama parents didn't came into usa with an army and then rule USA as this royal inherited birth right,the fact that someone would even use this as propaganda point shows how ignorant they are.
In a debate with tharoor j sai Deepak said "I would consider and foreign person(I forgot his name now) as Indian as he had the same ideology as me an Indian cultural ideology but I would not consider the people born in India an Indian If he has the ideology of Turks or pakistani who wish to only destroy" for better understanding watch his video I forgot most of the words now but you'll understand what I mean.
Dara shikoh
Don't you think akbar was different?....He abolished Jiziya Tax , His Prime minister was a hindu named Birbal.. there are many evidences that points akbar was different from others.
@@aadityapandey805 there are many people ( including me) who believe that birbal was an entirely fictional character based off of Tenali rama as many of their stories are literally the same. Akbar was such a heretic that he tried to put his name in Stories like Mahabharata etc just to advance his influence. I for one have no doubt that the Mughals were nothing short of terrorists who had an extremely perverted mind ( there are numerous claims about how they loved committing incest)
@@parashararamesh4252 Bhai incest to Islam m hi h.
Yeah I did watched it.
Infact twice.
The way Sai Deepak g spilled Facts and Truths , the event ended up Promoting J Sai Deepak book much much more than Tharoor's !!!
Culture is main teststone, Kushans and Shakas etc when accepted indian culture, became Indians and Turks and Mughals never did so, on the contrary they punished and tortured people if they followed Indian culture !
PS: Those who are saying culture is just an idea, badly need to follow Jaipur Dialogues and their thoughts on "Idea of India cannot be bigger than India" 😂. Culture is not just a thing, you need to move with your whole Kunba just because you don't have Arab culture with you, if Arab culture is in majority; and if you don't need to move despite having culture "different" from your neighbor then both of you are Hindu (this stmt is for giving a broader idea of situation)!
2. "शक लोगों को बाहरी बोलता है, तो ।"......... Answer to this is,
Plural forms in indian languages are used not only to represent multitude but also to convey a general feeling of respect in comment section.
I didn't call them Bahri as long as they are not Akramanakaari; In fact they are proved to be Indian by my comment !
A land does not have culture, the people of that land have it. And in India every group (clan) has its own culture. (And some of these cultures are imposed on them.) Culture is an idea. It is independent of geographical boundary. If we had a revelation to new and better foreign idea, no harm in giving up old domestic ideas.
Kushans were Buddhist and hindu they didn't have any Greek culture directly nor any surviving roots from Greece they were Indians only whose genetic roots were partly from Greece that's why they were called indo Greek like 10% maybe
@@ananth21380Ofcourse, our culture is inextricably linked to this land and has been shaped by it. Deifying the land itself is an Indian cultural trait, common with several other native cultures worldwide, most of which are now extinct. The diversity of subcultures in India among the various jaatis, sampradayas, and panths is the manifestation of the various localisations in the spectrum of Philosophia Perrenis. Islam and Christianity are impositions upon our people and are fundamentally countercultural to the 'Bharatiya, and indeed any native cultural experience. Their obligatory but predatory expansionism and monotheistic 'revealed' doctrines have annihilated native cultures the world over and have nothing in common with the Bharatiya cultural spectrum.
@@apoorvpandit4929 When you keep 'Feminist' religion on the opposite side, you can find many similarities between the traditional religions (Hinduism, Judaism, Christianity, Islam). Difference between them will become like the subcultural differences between Shaivam vs Vaishnavam. Or Kapaalikam vs Kaalaamugam.
But feminism is exactly opposite religion by virtues.
@@ananth21380 on the contrary, Feminism, religion or not, is Just Abrahamism repackaged. Imposed Normative values for the world. 'Hinduism', i.e, the Indian dharmic traditions, have got nothing remotely in common with such fancy universal shackles.
Exactly Sir. I'm satisfied of your answer. Thank you for educating us.
You are a legend of Indian history sir!!! keep working on your content sir
These videos are really interesting... you show us the real history not like fake stuff in ncert!! hats off
Also USA is made by Europeans by exterminating it's native people, while India still has it's different native ethnicities that followed their indigenous hindu faith, Akbar was descendant of invaders while Obama was not and wasn't trying to Spread his foregin saudi faith, rather his parents were mere immigrants to USA,to a land that was already invaded and wiped out of it's native people,Obama parents didn't came into usa with an army and then rule USA as this royal inherited birth right,the fact that someone would even use this as propaganda point shows how ignorant they are.
Well said. Thank you for saying it out loud and making it so clear. Heartening to see such a platform giving out such clear answers. Best wishes.
Love from Nepal. Much to learn from you sir🇳🇵❤️🙏
Thank you for enlightening us, You're doing a great job.
Are you in Delhi ?
Followers of non-Indian religions are NOT technically "Indians". Only loving India's land resources is NOT patriotism. It is infact first class treachery.
Land, Lust, Loot is their profession . Never did they respect the culture of this holy land .
Exactly !!!
@@Behappy11231 Actually, the weakness of Indian kings led foreigners to loot us. I think our ancient kings need to be blamed for this not foreigners. If china attacks us and capture our land, would you call it a fault of chinese or the weakness of Indian government?
Are converted people not Patriotic?
And shahi tharoor's counter was, mughals stayed in india, whatever they looted they spent in india.🤣. this is such a stupid counter, they looted indian people and spent it on building palaces and tombs for themsleves. not like they started "ladli behen" yojan, or jan dhan yojna.
Amazing facts and contents. Bravo for presenting such an informative msgs. Thanks for this Sir.
I am very very proud that I'm following this channel. Amazing person. Can't believe that such PPL exist and want to be in India. I can't express many things I feel about India but he is talking about all that
thank you for what you do sir, you are like a father to me and an inspiration to all.
The best Myth buster by chavda sir.
Very good definition of citizenship.
3:31 No one can give better savage replies than you when it comes to History😂
You are doing phenomenal work. Thank you so much.
Was the Roman empire really as genuine as it is glorified and was it really the golden age for every common man as they claim?
Lol Romans trembled in fear when they hear the name of Persia they quite literally needed a city-state to fight me and defeat me
@General Zorawar Singh
Who are they? Why should we care?
@@khosrowanushirwan7591 When? The Persian Empires after the fall of the Achaemids(Who's "Fearsome" armies fell to a literal city state with barely a fraction of their population I might add.)
As for the later Persian Empires during the Roman Empire, they are a footnote in history compared to Rome, and no real effort was made to conquer Persia in the first place, there was one occurance under Trajan in which the Persians were losing and ended with the Romans sacking Ctesiphon (The Parthian-Persian capital) the only reason the Persians survived was because Rebellions broke out in thr Eastern Mediteranean and North Africa which Forced Trajan to return and deal with them instead of consolidating his victories.
And later on the Islamic invasions failed to conquer Eastern Rome(It took them a thousand years) where as the Sassanid Empire fell in fucking 645 AD.
Long story short, the Persians were pussies compared to Rome.
Rome was much much powerful than we think, it was truly super power of known world, it's impact on modern world is till felt (law, lawyer, senate/parliament, senator, military discipline, governors, public baths, central government, water supply to city, city's own police & fire department, roads, infrastructure as public debt spending, standardized water taps/equipment across empire etc., & yes slavery & gladiators too, just to name few). Roman Republic lasted for about 400 year roughly about 4 centuries 0 BC, then civil wars, Caesar, Augustus, conversion to Roman empire happened, next 2 centuries were peak of Roman dominance & culture, then down fall happened, even then as some say Byzantine was eastern Roman empire which lasted another 600 years, Roman history is fascinating.
@@AmitParopkari sadly, people talk about the technological advancements of rome but no one talks about the india.the comforts u r mentioning about are already there in harappan civilization.and as per technology indians discovered battery it written in agasthya samhitha.maybe the man is a myth but the technology is not
Sir please explain the timeline between 1000 AD - 2000 AD of India and of the world because I am a student and now coming to know that all history I was taught was fake, wrong so sir, if you can then please make a video on this ( I don't know how much time this will take??) or you can explain it in one of your upcoming live sessions, thankyou as always for what you teach.
You are just Gem!💜
Akbar born in Umarkot Pakistan akbar mom born in paat Pakistan akbar father born in kabul Afghanistan. There was no India it was called "Hindustan" and hind territories was ruled by different king he merged all the territories from Afghanistan, pak, and make it Akhand Bharat than how can he is not INDIAN?
@Aditya Kumar Pandey wo time Pe India name nhi tha wo time sab kings alag alag territories pe raaj kerte tha and koi bhi king apne territories dene keliye taiyaar nhi tha sab kings ko ek dusre ke fort pe invade kerna hota tha taki unka empire expand hosake mughals only 12k ki army leke aaye tha q kisine haraya nhi unko jizya tax se itni problem hoti to unko support q kerre dusre kings ne mughals ko.. Marathon jab rule kerre tha unka normal tax sase high wala tax tha tabhi last me koi king ne maratha ko support nhi kerra Ahmed Shah abdali ke time ...
Akbar killed more than a million non combatant hindu brhamins and ordered their janeau to be tied together so he can verify the numbers....in another account he rewarded a Islamic cleric for killing hindus and collecting their blood in a bowl for him to dip his beard in kafir's blood which he did when he went to mathura...how on earth is he indian? it is culture that defines our nation he wanted to wipe it out and he had a turkik DNA so he was neither cultural an indian nor he was indian y DNA
@@hasanpatel6641 There is a diffrence b/w cultural unity and political unity india had and still has its cultural unity so you people can keep trying to mind fuck yourself to the conclusion that you do not follow a foreign culture and culturaly speaking are not Bhartiyas at any level
Sir aurangzeb was a villian but Akbar removed jaziya,he had removed extra taxes on hindus,he was an atheist in my belief.he removed the slavery thing and he brought many social reforms.people were not converted by force in his time.
Wow! Countered two aspects in one question. Great and thanks for bringing this to light that we should idolise our own culture rather than that of a foreign one
People who say Akbar was secular should know what he did in Chittorgarh
He was atleast not as bad as the others
@@khosrowanushirwan7591 massacring 30k innocent people was "not as bad as others"?. He was just as bad if not worse.
@@khosrowanushirwan7591 Depends on what's your standard of "being bad".
@@p_HoE_niX thank you for understanding me
Very nice answer chavda ji 🙏
It doesn't matter if you are born in India the thing that actually matters is the contribution that you have made for the betterment of the society..!🇮🇳
you are wrong completely my friend, betterment of society could be done by anyone, but it is all about the principals, British made railways which are useful for us now but the principal existence of railways is too loot and make NATIVE INDIANS weak that's what matters. just don't blind say good of society, anybody can do good to society in every generation.
Superbly answered...as always..
Sir u changed our thought process
Awesome answer, clarified my thoughts. Thanks
Very good explanation.
#AskAbhijit sir it is a urgent request, tomorrow in our school we have to write letter to modiji, the topic is my vision for india in 2047, can you please give some points
He did a collab on a this topic..I forgot the channel name..it was with Abhi and Niyu and C A archana and others youtubers
Brother, as if modiji is hoing to read letters from all of you?😁 ye school wale bevakoofi krvate rehte hain.
Do you really think govt gonna run by students opinions which they COPY & PASTE from here and there
Abhijit Chavda ji dvara kahi gaye bato me se koi bhi ak likh do . jese we want new constitution ya fir new education policy which provides free education to every individual , invest in R&D , modernise military , etc .
Just Write in bold words " Dharmic Rastra" and change of the some parts of constitution
@@whocares3132 He will get suspended for sure
Thousand and thousand britishers born in India, were they Indians? Why they left India, then after 1947.
Engrez aaiya aaur geyaa..lekin Turk log ihapehi raah geyaa aapni islam ki prashar ke liye..
Amazing explanation sir.
0:45 these lines touches my heart ❤️
Amazing answer sir..
What a nice explanation
GREAT ANSWER.
legend sir.. what is your source of such a deep sighted knowledge.
Good discussion
Humayun was born in Afghanistan (that time India), so his son Akbar is automatically Indian.
Akbar had Indian Rajput blood because he was born to a Sodha Rajput king and Persian women at Amerkot palace....took care of him till 14 yrs
#AskAbhijit 1. Sir can you tell of about battle of kangra state 1333AD where 8000 Katoch rajput (plz tell about their history little bit) defeated 100000 Tuglaq.
2. Sir, tell about the mistakes did by our greatest leader Shri pandit Jawaharlal Nehru and Mahatama Gandhi .
3. Sir, can India itself defend from 2 front war not as an offensive strike but by defending itself.
4. Sir why the Nazi Germany was successful and how they defeated whole Europe .
5. Sir why India decide be a socialist state.
6. Sir there is a new type of tax on Hindu tenples of 4% in bihar recently.(your opinion).
7. Sir, is there a chance of civil war in India.
8. Sir, what can be reasons to India to fragmented.
9. Sir, last and final question how old is Hinduism or the sanatan dharm.
Plz answer my question sir how I can get knowledge like you you are my guru sir.
Great information that we never introduced to in our schools. I am so much addicted to your videos and the information you are sharing. Thank you sir, I just wish you bring more and more videos like this.🙏🏼
How he can be invaders?
We should define our own standard.
India has great history. Ayurvedic, zero, yoga, Sanskrit...
Unfortunately we forgot our legacy.
Cultural expansion
Vs cultural destruction
He was half Turk half Persian origin but later generations are half Indian
so what most of the muslims in india are the direct Descendants of hindus and yet they don't acknowledge that they consider themselves to be some descendent of arabs which actually make them outsiders
Saadhuvaad Abhijeet sir for logically explaining the difference
Wonderful, sir.
Beautiful, sir!
Swami Vivekananda has praised Akbar many times....he even told that'Akbar the great Mughal emperor was practically a Hindu'....why did he give such a statement....pls clarify sir....
I would suggest you watch the video on akbar by Let's talk religion they explained it beutiful ly in brief
Because of Colonial Influence that time.
He didn't have sources like us to study else he would have hated Akbar.
Only sources that were mainstream that period were Colonial Communist historians.
I think you have got your answerr by the person above comment. If he was Hindu then why did he had to convert and change his hindu wife's name???
@Aspiring Astronaut I know that...... that's why I am also confused with the statement of swamiji..... different person portray Akbar's character differently.... being confused I asked this question to Abhijit sir...
Mr bhaumik don't pretend to be a lawyer of bloody marxists
i agree with Kautilya's definition of citizen . . . do look what Radha Rajan has to say . . . its very nice
Very nice explanation 👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍
Rudyard Kipling was born in India but he was a British. Jinnah was born in India but he was a Pakistani
very powerful answer of this question you are legend sir
Loved these small videos ✌️
Rightly said sir.
Good point regarding Jus Soli, learnt a lot regarding India's Jus Soli stance
Mu tor jabab dia Abhijit sir ne.
In this case I want to oppose you because first of all not only akbar and his ancestors and heirs also a lots of indian dynasty like Chola, Gupta, Gurjar Pratihar even the Mauryans fought with Indian states but this doesn't mean that they weren't Indians they are Indians. And secondly why did you tell that akbar tried deploy his culture?? He tried to introduce a new religion 'Din E Ilahi' about what I think, this is a kind of code of conduct like Ashoka's 'Dhamma'. What do you think about this, Sir Abhijit Chavda??
#AskAbhijit Sir the Haplogroup H which is found in india predominantly and less in europe, isn't it true that there are two types H1 and H2, H2 is what was dominant in europe 10,000 years ago and was destroyed by yamnaya invasion while H1 remains intact, so doesn't this destroy aryan migration. To rub salt into the wounds the H2 Haplogroup originated in the steppe region
bro i heard about this in a UA-cam channel (string) can you verify and expand on this for me. " caste system is a foreign idea implemented on us to divide our society and the way we define our self is by gotra." another thing did the word caste really come from the Spanish word casta ?
A lot of japanese were born in Japanese occupied Manchuria after 1931 and in Korea after 1896. Some of them ruled that part of china and even spoke manchu language and wore manchu clothes. Same for japanese generals and soldiers in Korea. Do the chinese and koreans Believe Those Japanese soldiers who were born in korea or manchuria as their own citizens???
Excellent
Sir, I agree with you.
By the same definition, does that make Dara Shikoh a Indian and not a "Invader"
#AskAbhijit
Dara shikoh spread Indian culture to foreign countries he translate hindu and other Indian-origin religion scriptures to Persian and Turk language
We can call him foreigner by blood but he was a true indian by heart he believe India as his land
Who says that India does not allow citizenship by birth? India allows citizenship by birth, by descent, by registration, by naturalisation, by incorporation of territory. Check out section 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 of citizenship act, 1955 & citizenship amendment act, 2003.
For that there is a condition that atleast one of your parents has to be indian citizen.
Sir your smile is too good
Beautifully explained
Going by the standards of USA,Pakistani leaders born in India should also be called as Indians??
Valid point 👍🤣
#AskAbhijit Sir, can you make video on lengendary king Samrat Vikramaditya after whom Vikram Samvat started. In Jain scriptures, it is said that Samrat Vikramaditya was born in 6-7 th century BCE and he was from Malava clan and he started his Samvat as Malava samvat in starting but later came to known as Vikram Samvat.
What do ABHIJEET CHAWDA does for living ?? Being a student of History ( as he himself mentioned many times), from where does he collect so much wide range of knowledge ?? Will it ever be answered?? With many many thanks and gratitudes for letting us feel proud BHARTIYAS.
He is a astrophysicist and does freelancing he codes websites and AI algorithm for other people
U may read some of his Research papers. It's there on Internet.
Along with History , he really is good in his research papers too.
Akbar wanted to capture his home, Transoxiana, but his son Jahangir refused to capture Qandahar. Akbar died untimely otherwise, Central Asia would have been captured.
By this logic, General Dyer was born in Punjab, does that make him Punjabi? 😂😂😂😂
Big fan of your sir, please make a video on your bookshelf.
Sir ARE YOU MARRIED?
why does it matter?
Freedom hai toh nahi ha
How would you treat a bacteria/germ that multiplies within your body? Is it an infection or is it a part of your body?
is there one so-called Islamic monument that was built on free land(not owned by any temple or some architecture )
like I used to think Fatehpur was built by abkar the lol great (as told by books)
we have clear evidence about fatehpur , Vishnu sthamb taj mahal most mosques being built on some other structures
for eg - Ganesh Ji, bells in dhruv sthamb complex, etc etc etc
#askabhijit
If we're calling Qutub Minar a Hindu structure (which it is), then might as well call it the original name, Vishnu Stambha.
Lol they even create their holiest place on the site of Arab Pagans: the Kaaba.
@@archockencanto1645 yeah completely agree (I had edited )
Thanks for showing right facts
Initially Akbar was a Ghazi but with experience he transformed into a Kaafir. He promoted Indian culture and that is the reason why he was called Kaafir by muslim scholars. He banned cow slaughter. He worshipped Ganges and Sun ☀️ god. He was a vegetarian. He allowed his wife Harkai Bai to follow Hinduism. His close friends were Birbal and Abul Fazal who were liberal minds of that period. He choose Khusrau Mirza as his successor over religious fanatic Jahangir. He founded new religion called Din i illah e that was a blasphemy in Islam. He issued Ram Sita coins. Out of nine navaratnas, four were hindus. He built many hindu temples for Mariam Ul zamani. He was a Ghazi in early phase of his life and he murdered 30,000 unharmed combatants after the fall of Chittoor. But later he commissioned Statues to honour great rajput warrior Jaimal Rathore and Patta Sisodia, heroes of Siege of Chittoor in his Kaafir phase. He also built a temple for this great warriors. He married of his daughter to hindu musician Tarsan
thats called propaganda
@@prafful_sahu Every single word mentioned above can be verified through contemporary literary or archaeological sources. Do you have a source that proves this is "propaganda"?
Akbar be like : gazzab bejjati h😭
This channel should be translated into state languages.
#askabhijit
Sir please tell us about field martial sam Manekshaw and
what would have happened if sam Manekshaw fought in 1962 war
just a follow up question:
So after how many generation does one with a foreign descent becomes eligible enough to be a citizen, Since I don't think we all could be very sure that our ancestors were born in the same place as us considering the regulated changes in geography and nature of humans to migrate for better resources.
A very genuine question as Akbar was the second generation Mughal and his father was born in Afghanistan was what about the later rulers and they were born as the results of marriages with pure Indians
0:10 his laugh says it all🤣🤣🤣
I agree with u sir 👍
Vah bhai vah!
Our Liberal community people will say that Kaniskha was a Foreigner and Invader but not 2nd wave of Turks so called Mughals like Akbar.
Stamp out Indian culture? What nonsense!!!!! Yes, he was outsider (father Turk, mother Farsi). Yes, Persian and Turki were his languages. But he did not stamp out any Indian culture. He promoted them (Kathak (the Muslim version), Urdu, Biryani, Jadau jewellery, Mughal style architecture being some examples). Yes, a lot of inter mingling of cultures happened. Indian and Persian cultures coalesced and an Indo-Saracenic culture developed. Yes, I agree that native Indian culture was the less visible one here, but it was there definitely.
For that not to happen (at least not in that manner), we Indians should have had the sense to UNITE and fight the outsider, which happened ONLY under Gandhi. Even the 1857 the first war of independence/sepoy mutiny, was an uncoordinated revolt.
Also, Akbar was not simply fighting inside India 'to stamp out Indian culture' - yes, he was ambitious and was keen on furthering his empire and, in doing so, he ended up uniting India as well. He also fought battles against Pathans (read Muslims) of Bengal and Bihar and fought Uzbeks (read Muslims) in the north western frontiers of India.
The stories you guys weave... your prejudice!!! Stop reading in black and white terms. There's a lot of grey shades there.
Aurangzeb was an absolute ass - on that, I am with you. But Akbar?
Adding to your list - he also built temples (like the Govind Deo Temple, Mathura), got Sanskrit epics translated into Persian, hosted religious debates, introduced Hindu rituals and festivals in the Mughal court. I would say he did a lot to promote Indian culture - the present city of Vrindavan was literally revived and rebuilt on his orders, Sanskrit education flourished with schools being opened for all, the library he built had over 20,000 volumes in several languages, and his own biography details the beliefs of all the six schools of Indian philosophy - native Indian culture was pretty visible, in my opinion. Also, the fact that Akbar was constantly dragged through the mud by the Islamic orthodoxy of his time for being "too Hindu" and a "danger to Islam", all because of his syncretism! Source being the Muntakhab-ut-Tawarikh by Badauni, Akbar's courtier and fierce critic of his religious policy. Ironic how he was, and still is, hated by extremists of both religions.
That's your opinion..!
#AskAbhijit Is the modern concept of democracy in India is anti Hindu civilization and how can we use Acharya Chanakya's Arthshastra doctrine in modern times to regulate and run the system of state?
#AskAbhijit - Sir, In Bhagavath Gita, Lord Krishna explains extensively about this universe and it's existence and origin very clearly that it's Him who created all this plus the 14 worlds. When Gita is considered to be the most authentic book for mankind, wat is the need for physics then ? Kindly explain as Iam a firm believer of Gita over science.
Sir says multiverse is a myth
Everything is Maya to evolve including science. Soul has to evolve through all the knowledge of BrahmAn. Physics is part of knowing BrahmAn.
@@khosrowanushirwan7591 14lokas mentioned in scriptures are conscious fields. There is a entire universe exists which is beyond human senses.
Human knowledge of physics is what has allowed you type this message lol.
I agree but didnt he say in one of the videos that kanishka had indian roots because he was descended from people who were banished out of india during the vedic war of 10 kings
This questioner has read Javed Akhtar's Tweet.
Shashi Tharoor won't agree with you sir.
He thinks just because they stayed here they are indian...I don't get it why do people think that shashi tharoor is so highly sophisticated and knowledgeable and he makes sense whenever he talks.
He is educated but he lacks the history knowledge📚 compare to others, so Sashi Tharoor s statement doesn't matter to people