Calculating the Gravitational Force

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 4 жов 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 383

  • @dtagg112
    @dtagg112 3 роки тому +102

    You explained in a few minutes what my professor took an entire lecture to explain and I had to come to you to understand it. You have valuable skills in communicating these concepts, thanks so much!

  • @nikhiMD
    @nikhiMD 9 років тому +356

    Best teacher I've ever had

    • @anujanshika533
      @anujanshika533 4 роки тому

      Hi everyone

    • @ryantheroman4331
      @ryantheroman4331 3 роки тому +8

      Taking Physics via zoom has me feeling like I haven’t been to a single physics class, after four months...

    • @merrickgustavo6502
      @merrickgustavo6502 3 роки тому

      Instablaster...

    • @Mrpoopy5
      @Mrpoopy5 2 роки тому

      Hello from 6 years in the future

    • @Tio_rop
      @Tio_rop 4 місяці тому

      ​@@Mrpoopy5hello from 2 years in the future

  • @AdehOkem
    @AdehOkem 3 місяці тому +1

    something that the spen several minutes to explain and I still couldn't comprehend and you explained it so easily ❤ 🎉

  • @rider2731
    @rider2731 6 років тому +10

    Very well explained. It shows that you really know what you're talking about. Thumbs up for you teacher.

  • @ikleinveld
    @ikleinveld 9 років тому +44

    You are literally awesome! I'm supposed to go to the best school in the Netherlands and my teachers don't even touch this..

  • @ravindranathhospital1362
    @ravindranathhospital1362 3 роки тому +4

    Your videos on calucalating gravitational force and action potential were really helpful. Thank you

  • @iamthestrongest007
    @iamthestrongest007 8 місяців тому +1

    Your videos are really really good, that I even recommended my teacher to watch your videos because she was having a hard time understanding a few concepts. Really appreciate your videos... they are really helpful...

  • @LoboOutdoor
    @LoboOutdoor 7 років тому +30

    Thanks! Needed this for my astronomy class.. It's fun to do.

  • @anna9975
    @anna9975 9 років тому +2

    These videos are the only way I make it through IB physics...
    Thank you so much!

  • @Meatchop
    @Meatchop 8 років тому +18

    Never having studied physics in HS, this was really interesting. Ty!

  • @danthurineeraja
    @danthurineeraja 4 роки тому +5

    thanks.....
    but had a hard time understanding the last step o0f the first problem

  • @joshuaosifo7977
    @joshuaosifo7977 2 роки тому +2

    So easy to understand I love this lesson!!!

  • @esquiro_cody
    @esquiro_cody 3 роки тому +3

    Thank you so much. People like you are true heroes. I'm certain that your videos are going to help me achieve my goals in my first university physics classes!

  • @pigeonhead9139
    @pigeonhead9139 3 роки тому +2

    this makes physics fun, thank you

  • @johnmdc4228
    @johnmdc4228 2 роки тому +3

    please put the complete step by step process to understand easily by other students, thank you

  • @josellecedron6540
    @josellecedron6540 Рік тому +12

    How did you get the 1.5×10-¹⁰N?

    • @Josh034
      @Josh034 6 місяців тому

      Seriously

  • @abugreayingangbagerald1976
    @abugreayingangbagerald1976 8 місяців тому

    Thank you so much,I really appreciate

  • @totilujan
    @totilujan 2 роки тому +10

    How did you get the 1.5 x 10 -10? What operation happens between G constant and 2.25?

    • @anythinwangel
      @anythinwangel Рік тому

      yes pls im still confused

    • @dirxin
      @dirxin 8 місяців тому +2

      to simply put, multiplication was used in the given
      (6.67)(2.25) = 15.0075
      move the decimal point to the left (once) and you get 1.5
      usually answers are expressed like these examples:
      • 1.0
      • 2.5
      • 7.8
      and use exponents to shorten big numbers
      therefore, 1.5x10^-10N
      i suggest you look up scientific notation so you can get a better understanding :))

    • @Josh034
      @Josh034 6 місяців тому

      why did -11n turn into - 10n tho?

  • @ibrahimibbu645
    @ibrahimibbu645 9 років тому +4

    delicious explanation.......thnx a lot

  • @selisiaharizaj6542
    @selisiaharizaj6542 3 роки тому +2

    such a good explanation plz do more videos in physics so i can learn more from you 🙌🙏

  • @ENBAdnanMasood
    @ENBAdnanMasood 8 років тому +1

    LOVED UR EXPLANATION HELPED ME A LOT

  • @GuerrasLaws
    @GuerrasLaws 11 місяців тому

    The origin of momentum creation is founded on the application of energy. Momentum serves as the initial cause of pushing and pulling. The energy, emanating from the internal core of a planet, is what gives rise to momentum, commonly referred to as gravity, and not due to the planet’s size, mass, or space-time curvature. For example, when energy is applied, it generates the necessary momentum for the actions of pushing and pulling. Without the application of energy, momentum cannot be established. Consequently, force cannot be exerted for pushing and pulling, as it lacks a physical existence. This, in turn, clarifies why force is not gravity. ~Guadalupe Guerra

  • @amrutvani2
    @amrutvani2 10 років тому +1

    Amazing explaination !

    • @Bozemanscience1
      @Bozemanscience1  10 років тому +1

      amrutvani2 Thanks so much. I'm happy to hear that the videos are helpful.

  • @bucketrance
    @bucketrance 9 років тому +64

    Your 4 on 4:44 was amazing. what 4?

    • @destiny-ry3ji
      @destiny-ry3ji 4 роки тому +8

      Anonymous squirrel this comment was 4 years ago 🤯

    • @cj1240
      @cj1240 4 роки тому +1

      @Alfonso Flores and ur comment is from 4 days ago...

    • @thisuserhaspassedaway3100
      @thisuserhaspassedaway3100 4 роки тому +2

      And I’m the fourth comment 😳

    • @Hypoaqua
      @Hypoaqua 4 роки тому

      Yes

    • @ryantheroman4331
      @ryantheroman4331 3 роки тому

      @Alfonso Flores Damn, you guys had no idea about how long corona would be affecting us for...

  • @gehadyasser1001
    @gehadyasser1001 5 років тому +1

    Thanks so much that was so helpful

  • @davidbloxham5062
    @davidbloxham5062 8 місяців тому

    Love it! So well done

  • @bananabeast9384
    @bananabeast9384 3 роки тому

    ty so much, my physics teacher is horrible at teaching and should not be doing so, unlike you, your amazing! Thanks for the help!

  • @codingwithbobby8340
    @codingwithbobby8340 4 роки тому +3

    4.45 Where did the 2.25 go? and Why does the -11th power turn into -10

  • @mr.unknown1070
    @mr.unknown1070 3 роки тому +2

    Awesome. All doubts cleared!!!
    We dont have such brilliant teachers in India and that's why Indian educational system is nothing when compared to America's and other countries.

  • @tirthankardas3392
    @tirthankardas3392 4 роки тому +1

    nice one

  • @nicotandotrunz6957
    @nicotandotrunz6957 4 роки тому

    Another great video ! Thank you

  • @leonardhambleton1890
    @leonardhambleton1890 11 місяців тому

    Haven’t found it yet, but back in the day I used to know it, the gravitational formula on the face of the earth. There is no such thing as a true ‘center of gravity’ outside a singularity. On the face of the earth, one is pulled mostly straight down, but also at angles. Was hoping this video pointed that out.

  • @lindelwamthethwa9528
    @lindelwamthethwa9528 2 роки тому

    Thank you, understood very well

  • @renevener
    @renevener 2 роки тому

    He was my teacher for Biology, Chemistry and Physics.

  • @kulkarniaditya754
    @kulkarniaditya754 7 років тому

    Thanks for making gravitation easier

  • @sahand_rwandzy
    @sahand_rwandzy 2 роки тому

    Great explanation but, that “Four” kinda got me😂

  • @unknown_4rtist797
    @unknown_4rtist797 8 років тому

    This video is a blessing thank you sooooo much

  • @terryholland2526
    @terryholland2526 8 років тому +8

    I would like to find out how you got your answer. I'm new at this stuff and need a little more help than just "here figure it out."

    • @meranism673
      @meranism673 6 років тому

      ua-cam.com/video/JQ1F2b4qCwk/v-deo.html
      I believe this link will give you an idea how he achieved the answer .

  • @saintmonster5984
    @saintmonster5984 2 роки тому

    thank you that helped

  • @GoodTime-zn1bg
    @GoodTime-zn1bg 4 роки тому +2

    Actually in the perfect round revolution gravity is taken out, the newton intuition and explanation is half right half wrong.
    The force of gravity cancels out in the formula. In an elliptical revolution the condition of falling and missing fits better,
    but again just in the falling pathway. Isn't it?

  • @itlogmaalat7097
    @itlogmaalat7097 7 років тому +1

    thank you so much!

  • @joaquinmatte5355
    @joaquinmatte5355 4 роки тому

    thank you

  • @Jaami
    @Jaami 8 років тому +1

    Thanks!

  • @sakurabdul2369
    @sakurabdul2369 6 років тому

    Clear explanation!!! And awesome animation ^_^

  • @EmePlaysGames
    @EmePlaysGames 6 років тому

    This helps me so much im glad i stumbled upon this its helping so much in my class i didn't get it now I do

  • @dangerzain3958
    @dangerzain3958 Рік тому

    Thank you my savior of physics 😊😆

  • @rakaarsha4723
    @rakaarsha4723 4 роки тому

    i love ur vids

  • @sebastianmosley2936
    @sebastianmosley2936 8 років тому

    Great Video! Thank you.

  • @TheScienceCube
    @TheScienceCube 6 років тому

    Nice one!

  • @Ifinger151
    @Ifinger151 6 років тому +1

    2:34 did you mean Time or Distance. I think you mean Distance because in relation to earth a human simply doesn't have the mass to stay in orbit unless moving at a unfathomable speed.. at least in my opinion of course

  • @Sergiobaruffi
    @Sergiobaruffi 7 років тому

    Great class congratulations

  • @stephaniecantu6973
    @stephaniecantu6973 5 років тому +2

    It would be awesome if that last problem can be worked out with out a calculator! Studying for the MCAT and didnt get 126N lol

    • @Kyrqs
      @Kyrqs 3 роки тому

      I did it somehow

  • @cipherpol0123
    @cipherpol0123 5 років тому

    Very helpful thanks man 😊

  • @SUPANIJAFRICTV
    @SUPANIJAFRICTV 5 років тому

    thank sir it was really helpful

  • @originalSPECTER
    @originalSPECTER Рік тому

    Always messed with my head that the more massive the object, the more gravitational force applied, but the acceleration remains the same no matter the mass of the object. I still can't really articulate why that is.

  • @miranahmed6741
    @miranahmed6741 7 років тому +1

    very helpful

  • @michaellaforte6964
    @michaellaforte6964 2 роки тому

    Makes so much sense! But then what happens when a rocket is traveling perpendicularly away from the earth toward the moon, not accelerating but moving at a constant speed? Is there a small gravity toward the bottom or engines of the rocket since this is in the direction of the earth? At some distance weightlessness should balance between the pull of the moon and earth. I imagine there’s a name for this equilibrium point in space

  • @atticuswalker8970
    @atticuswalker8970 10 місяців тому

    g is the average density of mass. it's actually a wave of probability dependant on the frequency of quantum interactions required to contain energy as mass. the time required for each interaction. relative to the time of its souroundings.
    movement of mass over the same distance at less speed. requires less force. so mass with excess energy moves faster time. mass that looses energy. moves towards slower time. a unified theory of gravity.

    • @marcg1686
      @marcg1686 6 місяців тому

      I don't see volume in the equation.

  • @jabin1997
    @jabin1997 10 років тому +1

    Thank you so much! I wish you were my teacher at school, lol :))

    • @Bozemanscience1
      @Bozemanscience1  10 років тому +33

      Jabin Stalin I am your teacher in a roundabout way. Welcome to class. :)

  • @seshadrishankar6827
    @seshadrishankar6827 5 років тому

    From my 12 year old : gravitational force is the force that attracts me to Earth and is also the force that attracts the Earth to me. So if we have a population explosion will the Earth expand?

  • @yadiranolasco5125
    @yadiranolasco5125 2 роки тому

    Thank you for explaining this now I passed my test

  • @alessandromariani3015
    @alessandromariani3015 Рік тому

    I don't understand why the force of attraction is equal, then if the earth and the moon were stationary the gravity should move the two objects at the same speed right? That's strange

  • @dragonore2009
    @dragonore2009 7 років тому +2

    An explanation so easy to understand even a flat Earther can get it, or not.

    • @Narniak69
      @Narniak69 4 роки тому

      Extra rations for you brother!

  • @orrinedminsten506
    @orrinedminsten506 2 роки тому

    Equation: 2:18

  • @joshlauriruth4316
    @joshlauriruth4316 5 років тому

    Dude thank you so much!

  • @mariomuccino6040
    @mariomuccino6040 5 років тому

    I CALCULATED THE GRAVITATIONAL FORCE ON MR. ANDERSEN ON THE SURFACE OF MOON TO BE 126.3017193 NEWTONS ROUND OFF 126 N. AND THE GRAVITATIONAL FORCE ACTING ON MR. ANDERSEN STANDING ON THE SURFACE OF THE EARTH TO BE 764.3288401 NEWTONS ROUND OFF 764 N

  • @khedarenperumal8906
    @khedarenperumal8906 7 років тому

    Nice thank you very much!

  • @SamanthaRannells
    @SamanthaRannells 10 місяців тому

    can you do a video on how to calculate the ratios of distances? like discussing the inverse and proportionality of objects.

  • @mairtechnology9543
    @mairtechnology9543 6 років тому

    very talented

  • @moazelsawaf2000
    @moazelsawaf2000 5 років тому

    Really you are intelligent, Thanks a lot sir ❤

  • @nellvincervantes3223
    @nellvincervantes3223 5 років тому

    I have a question? Based on the examples from the books about statics, why gravitational force is not included between two objects there? Only the weight or the gravitational forces between object and Earth are only included and not G.F. between two objects. By that case, where could Gravitational forces between two objects be applied?

  • @atticuswalker
    @atticuswalker 7 місяців тому

    a easy way to find gravity is to drop something and see how far it moves.
    a way to confirm the measurement is to devide a distance of 1 by 3 to find the difference between begining middle and end.
    make a circle out of two of them and find the radius of that circle.
    thats gravity.

  • @schioncalzanzi7597
    @schioncalzanzi7597 8 років тому

    If it wasn't solely on Newton's gravitational unique law equation we would not be able to launch satellites into orbit in other word there would not be any youtube, facebook live time, no streaming vids of any sort whatsoever despite our knowledge about the internet and it's invention. The catalyst to having what we have is solely relates to newton's Law- Gravitational Forces. freaking awesome lol

  • @ashleymora1430
    @ashleymora1430 2 роки тому

    THANK YOU

  • @zoefofo7769
    @zoefofo7769 6 років тому

    I have to watch this again. I like science and economy

  • @Gromitdog1
    @Gromitdog1 7 років тому

    Doesn't the force of gravity become equal to the centrifigual force as to why there is weightlessness in space?

  • @anmekazaki5185
    @anmekazaki5185 3 роки тому

    i don't undestand the part where you do 1.5X10 (-10)N

  • @akshaygaikwad3280
    @akshaygaikwad3280 5 років тому

    Thanks sir

  • @lizzlasagna
    @lizzlasagna Рік тому +1

    how did he get 1.5?

  • @angelvargas9042
    @angelvargas9042 4 роки тому

    Thank you for your video!!!!

  • @philvinet4145
    @philvinet4145 2 роки тому

    IN you example of you standing on the moon...you used just the R value for the moon. Why did you not use the R value for yourself? (yes I know the difference is very small but correct is correct. )

  • @mekiyanbynum5250
    @mekiyanbynum5250 3 роки тому

    What? How did you even get 1.5*10^-10 from this?

  • @hanqinatallyxie
    @hanqinatallyxie 3 роки тому

    Thank youuu

  • @caetonfath5061
    @caetonfath5061 Рік тому

    If all objects have a gravitational pull, if we add more objects/mass to the equation dose it still work. For example the mass of you + the earth+ the tree next to me + my house would it still work and make sense

  • @londiwesibahle8369
    @londiwesibahle8369 6 років тому

    Thank you🤗

  • @priskangassa3154
    @priskangassa3154 5 років тому +1

    Is that 78kg the mass of somebody on the surface???

  • @TriviaQuizocity
    @TriviaQuizocity 4 роки тому

    isn't newtons a measurement of weight, not gravitational pull? did you mean that the objects that were 3 Kg would weigh
    1.5*10^-10 newtons under each others gravitational force? other than that small miscommunication this is a good explanation on the math.

  • @farbodAprin
    @farbodAprin 7 років тому

    Wow wonderful 😍😍😍 thanks alot...Aparin

  • @Bgfswqp725gjxv
    @Bgfswqp725gjxv 10 років тому

    YOUR VIDEO HELPS ME SO MUCH ! THANKH YOU (:

  • @griffinleggieri2885
    @griffinleggieri2885 6 років тому +5

    Four

  • @pankfish
    @pankfish Рік тому

    I have only seen the Newton described as kg*m/s^2. How do we get (m/kg)^2?

  • @jackgao5681
    @jackgao5681 8 років тому

    what if not all objects fall to earth at 9.8m/s, but close since the objects' gravity is too minuscule to alter the speed.

  • @Lucuskane
    @Lucuskane 10 років тому +2

    Thanks so much,
    I wish class like this everyday.
    Can you add another "m" to numerator? If calculating for 3 different masses

  • @kumarar745
    @kumarar745 4 роки тому

    Nice

  • @tonitabasco390
    @tonitabasco390 3 роки тому

    As the video came to an end I realized I’m severely screwed

  • @Victor-c5o
    @Victor-c5o Рік тому

    Hey, I'm kinda lost .... First you got 6.67×10^-11× 2.25 and then it became 1.5× 10^-10N

  • @deepthink7794
    @deepthink7794 2 роки тому

    Will we get the same answer by using w= mg

  • @kvngsimon
    @kvngsimon 3 місяці тому

    Got Kevin De Bruyne explaining physics before gta 6

  • @immanuvellohith1057
    @immanuvellohith1057 7 років тому

    really useful one
    thnk uuu

  • @fakir1264
    @fakir1264 4 роки тому +28

    Everyone appreciates him for this explanation but newton has already explained it years ago......

    • @nyorigin9457
      @nyorigin9457 4 роки тому +9

      Not only is his explanation convenient, being on UA-cam, he also explains it in a manner that allows people of all intellectuality to understand. Obviously Newton is to credit, but then all teachers have no significance if they’re judged by “originality”.

    • @fakir1264
      @fakir1264 4 роки тому +2

      @@nyorigin9457 but still everyone praises him as if he founded it there is a lot of difference in finding and explaining.

    • @Redley1
      @Redley1 10 місяців тому

      @@fakir1264Everyone knows that Isaac Newton discover how to calculate this but this guy posted a helpful tutorial which is why everyone is praising him, any other dumb questions fuckwad?

    • @dumpster1947
      @dumpster1947 7 місяців тому

      I wasn’t around in 1687! I’am now!

    • @Suu__114
      @Suu__114 6 місяців тому

      I'm leving in 2024 tho😂