You explained in a few minutes what my professor took an entire lecture to explain and I had to come to you to understand it. You have valuable skills in communicating these concepts, thanks so much!
Your videos are really really good, that I even recommended my teacher to watch your videos because she was having a hard time understanding a few concepts. Really appreciate your videos... they are really helpful...
Thank you so much. People like you are true heroes. I'm certain that your videos are going to help me achieve my goals in my first university physics classes!
to simply put, multiplication was used in the given (6.67)(2.25) = 15.0075 move the decimal point to the left (once) and you get 1.5 usually answers are expressed like these examples: • 1.0 • 2.5 • 7.8 and use exponents to shorten big numbers therefore, 1.5x10^-10N i suggest you look up scientific notation so you can get a better understanding :))
The origin of momentum creation is founded on the application of energy. Momentum serves as the initial cause of pushing and pulling. The energy, emanating from the internal core of a planet, is what gives rise to momentum, commonly referred to as gravity, and not due to the planet’s size, mass, or space-time curvature. For example, when energy is applied, it generates the necessary momentum for the actions of pushing and pulling. Without the application of energy, momentum cannot be established. Consequently, force cannot be exerted for pushing and pulling, as it lacks a physical existence. This, in turn, clarifies why force is not gravity. ~Guadalupe Guerra
Awesome. All doubts cleared!!! We dont have such brilliant teachers in India and that's why Indian educational system is nothing when compared to America's and other countries.
Haven’t found it yet, but back in the day I used to know it, the gravitational formula on the face of the earth. There is no such thing as a true ‘center of gravity’ outside a singularity. On the face of the earth, one is pulled mostly straight down, but also at angles. Was hoping this video pointed that out.
Actually in the perfect round revolution gravity is taken out, the newton intuition and explanation is half right half wrong. The force of gravity cancels out in the formula. In an elliptical revolution the condition of falling and missing fits better, but again just in the falling pathway. Isn't it?
2:34 did you mean Time or Distance. I think you mean Distance because in relation to earth a human simply doesn't have the mass to stay in orbit unless moving at a unfathomable speed.. at least in my opinion of course
Always messed with my head that the more massive the object, the more gravitational force applied, but the acceleration remains the same no matter the mass of the object. I still can't really articulate why that is.
Makes so much sense! But then what happens when a rocket is traveling perpendicularly away from the earth toward the moon, not accelerating but moving at a constant speed? Is there a small gravity toward the bottom or engines of the rocket since this is in the direction of the earth? At some distance weightlessness should balance between the pull of the moon and earth. I imagine there’s a name for this equilibrium point in space
g is the average density of mass. it's actually a wave of probability dependant on the frequency of quantum interactions required to contain energy as mass. the time required for each interaction. relative to the time of its souroundings. movement of mass over the same distance at less speed. requires less force. so mass with excess energy moves faster time. mass that looses energy. moves towards slower time. a unified theory of gravity.
From my 12 year old : gravitational force is the force that attracts me to Earth and is also the force that attracts the Earth to me. So if we have a population explosion will the Earth expand?
I don't understand why the force of attraction is equal, then if the earth and the moon were stationary the gravity should move the two objects at the same speed right? That's strange
I CALCULATED THE GRAVITATIONAL FORCE ON MR. ANDERSEN ON THE SURFACE OF MOON TO BE 126.3017193 NEWTONS ROUND OFF 126 N. AND THE GRAVITATIONAL FORCE ACTING ON MR. ANDERSEN STANDING ON THE SURFACE OF THE EARTH TO BE 764.3288401 NEWTONS ROUND OFF 764 N
I have a question? Based on the examples from the books about statics, why gravitational force is not included between two objects there? Only the weight or the gravitational forces between object and Earth are only included and not G.F. between two objects. By that case, where could Gravitational forces between two objects be applied?
a easy way to find gravity is to drop something and see how far it moves. a way to confirm the measurement is to devide a distance of 1 by 3 to find the difference between begining middle and end. make a circle out of two of them and find the radius of that circle. thats gravity.
If it wasn't solely on Newton's gravitational unique law equation we would not be able to launch satellites into orbit in other word there would not be any youtube, facebook live time, no streaming vids of any sort whatsoever despite our knowledge about the internet and it's invention. The catalyst to having what we have is solely relates to newton's Law- Gravitational Forces. freaking awesome lol
IN you example of you standing on the moon...you used just the R value for the moon. Why did you not use the R value for yourself? (yes I know the difference is very small but correct is correct. )
If all objects have a gravitational pull, if we add more objects/mass to the equation dose it still work. For example the mass of you + the earth+ the tree next to me + my house would it still work and make sense
isn't newtons a measurement of weight, not gravitational pull? did you mean that the objects that were 3 Kg would weigh 1.5*10^-10 newtons under each others gravitational force? other than that small miscommunication this is a good explanation on the math.
Not only is his explanation convenient, being on UA-cam, he also explains it in a manner that allows people of all intellectuality to understand. Obviously Newton is to credit, but then all teachers have no significance if they’re judged by “originality”.
@@fakir1264Everyone knows that Isaac Newton discover how to calculate this but this guy posted a helpful tutorial which is why everyone is praising him, any other dumb questions fuckwad?
You explained in a few minutes what my professor took an entire lecture to explain and I had to come to you to understand it. You have valuable skills in communicating these concepts, thanks so much!
True
Best teacher I've ever had
Hi everyone
Taking Physics via zoom has me feeling like I haven’t been to a single physics class, after four months...
Instablaster...
Hello from 6 years in the future
@@Mrpoopy5hello from 2 years in the future
something that the spen several minutes to explain and I still couldn't comprehend and you explained it so easily ❤ 🎉
Very well explained. It shows that you really know what you're talking about. Thumbs up for you teacher.
You are literally awesome! I'm supposed to go to the best school in the Netherlands and my teachers don't even touch this..
Your videos on calucalating gravitational force and action potential were really helpful. Thank you
Your videos are really really good, that I even recommended my teacher to watch your videos because she was having a hard time understanding a few concepts. Really appreciate your videos... they are really helpful...
Where are you from
My from gordan
Thanks! Needed this for my astronomy class.. It's fun to do.
These videos are the only way I make it through IB physics...
Thank you so much!
Never having studied physics in HS, this was really interesting. Ty!
I’m doing this as a freshman in HighSchool and I don’t have a choice😭😂
Hi
Past man
@@kaylaspeakman916 ayyyyy me too
thanks.....
but had a hard time understanding the last step o0f the first problem
So easy to understand I love this lesson!!!
Thank you so much. People like you are true heroes. I'm certain that your videos are going to help me achieve my goals in my first university physics classes!
wait this is university stuff? im doing a presentation about this in the 9th grade tf
@@m1stery_who801 how old are you?
@@itzzbram0708 curently 15
Ya
this makes physics fun, thank you
please put the complete step by step process to understand easily by other students, thank you
How did you get the 1.5×10-¹⁰N?
Seriously
Thank you so much,I really appreciate
How did you get the 1.5 x 10 -10? What operation happens between G constant and 2.25?
yes pls im still confused
to simply put, multiplication was used in the given
(6.67)(2.25) = 15.0075
move the decimal point to the left (once) and you get 1.5
usually answers are expressed like these examples:
• 1.0
• 2.5
• 7.8
and use exponents to shorten big numbers
therefore, 1.5x10^-10N
i suggest you look up scientific notation so you can get a better understanding :))
why did -11n turn into - 10n tho?
delicious explanation.......thnx a lot
such a good explanation plz do more videos in physics so i can learn more from you 🙌🙏
LOVED UR EXPLANATION HELPED ME A LOT
The origin of momentum creation is founded on the application of energy. Momentum serves as the initial cause of pushing and pulling. The energy, emanating from the internal core of a planet, is what gives rise to momentum, commonly referred to as gravity, and not due to the planet’s size, mass, or space-time curvature. For example, when energy is applied, it generates the necessary momentum for the actions of pushing and pulling. Without the application of energy, momentum cannot be established. Consequently, force cannot be exerted for pushing and pulling, as it lacks a physical existence. This, in turn, clarifies why force is not gravity. ~Guadalupe Guerra
Amazing explaination !
amrutvani2 Thanks so much. I'm happy to hear that the videos are helpful.
Your 4 on 4:44 was amazing. what 4?
Anonymous squirrel this comment was 4 years ago 🤯
@Alfonso Flores and ur comment is from 4 days ago...
And I’m the fourth comment 😳
Yes
@Alfonso Flores Damn, you guys had no idea about how long corona would be affecting us for...
Thanks so much that was so helpful
Love it! So well done
ty so much, my physics teacher is horrible at teaching and should not be doing so, unlike you, your amazing! Thanks for the help!
4.45 Where did the 2.25 go? and Why does the -11th power turn into -10
Awesome. All doubts cleared!!!
We dont have such brilliant teachers in India and that's why Indian educational system is nothing when compared to America's and other countries.
nice one
Another great video ! Thank you
Haven’t found it yet, but back in the day I used to know it, the gravitational formula on the face of the earth. There is no such thing as a true ‘center of gravity’ outside a singularity. On the face of the earth, one is pulled mostly straight down, but also at angles. Was hoping this video pointed that out.
Thank you, understood very well
He was my teacher for Biology, Chemistry and Physics.
Thanks for making gravitation easier
Great explanation but, that “Four” kinda got me😂
This video is a blessing thank you sooooo much
I would like to find out how you got your answer. I'm new at this stuff and need a little more help than just "here figure it out."
ua-cam.com/video/JQ1F2b4qCwk/v-deo.html
I believe this link will give you an idea how he achieved the answer .
thank you that helped
Actually in the perfect round revolution gravity is taken out, the newton intuition and explanation is half right half wrong.
The force of gravity cancels out in the formula. In an elliptical revolution the condition of falling and missing fits better,
but again just in the falling pathway. Isn't it?
thank you so much!
thank you
Thanks!
Clear explanation!!! And awesome animation ^_^
This helps me so much im glad i stumbled upon this its helping so much in my class i didn't get it now I do
Thank you my savior of physics 😊😆
i love ur vids
Great Video! Thank you.
Nice one!
2:34 did you mean Time or Distance. I think you mean Distance because in relation to earth a human simply doesn't have the mass to stay in orbit unless moving at a unfathomable speed.. at least in my opinion of course
Great class congratulations
It would be awesome if that last problem can be worked out with out a calculator! Studying for the MCAT and didnt get 126N lol
I did it somehow
Very helpful thanks man 😊
thank sir it was really helpful
Always messed with my head that the more massive the object, the more gravitational force applied, but the acceleration remains the same no matter the mass of the object. I still can't really articulate why that is.
very helpful
Makes so much sense! But then what happens when a rocket is traveling perpendicularly away from the earth toward the moon, not accelerating but moving at a constant speed? Is there a small gravity toward the bottom or engines of the rocket since this is in the direction of the earth? At some distance weightlessness should balance between the pull of the moon and earth. I imagine there’s a name for this equilibrium point in space
g is the average density of mass. it's actually a wave of probability dependant on the frequency of quantum interactions required to contain energy as mass. the time required for each interaction. relative to the time of its souroundings.
movement of mass over the same distance at less speed. requires less force. so mass with excess energy moves faster time. mass that looses energy. moves towards slower time. a unified theory of gravity.
I don't see volume in the equation.
Thank you so much! I wish you were my teacher at school, lol :))
Jabin Stalin I am your teacher in a roundabout way. Welcome to class. :)
From my 12 year old : gravitational force is the force that attracts me to Earth and is also the force that attracts the Earth to me. So if we have a population explosion will the Earth expand?
Thank you for explaining this now I passed my test
🥺🤩🥳
I don't understand why the force of attraction is equal, then if the earth and the moon were stationary the gravity should move the two objects at the same speed right? That's strange
An explanation so easy to understand even a flat Earther can get it, or not.
Extra rations for you brother!
Equation: 2:18
Dude thank you so much!
I CALCULATED THE GRAVITATIONAL FORCE ON MR. ANDERSEN ON THE SURFACE OF MOON TO BE 126.3017193 NEWTONS ROUND OFF 126 N. AND THE GRAVITATIONAL FORCE ACTING ON MR. ANDERSEN STANDING ON THE SURFACE OF THE EARTH TO BE 764.3288401 NEWTONS ROUND OFF 764 N
Nice thank you very much!
can you do a video on how to calculate the ratios of distances? like discussing the inverse and proportionality of objects.
very talented
Really you are intelligent, Thanks a lot sir ❤
I have a question? Based on the examples from the books about statics, why gravitational force is not included between two objects there? Only the weight or the gravitational forces between object and Earth are only included and not G.F. between two objects. By that case, where could Gravitational forces between two objects be applied?
a easy way to find gravity is to drop something and see how far it moves.
a way to confirm the measurement is to devide a distance of 1 by 3 to find the difference between begining middle and end.
make a circle out of two of them and find the radius of that circle.
thats gravity.
If it wasn't solely on Newton's gravitational unique law equation we would not be able to launch satellites into orbit in other word there would not be any youtube, facebook live time, no streaming vids of any sort whatsoever despite our knowledge about the internet and it's invention. The catalyst to having what we have is solely relates to newton's Law- Gravitational Forces. freaking awesome lol
THANK YOU
I have to watch this again. I like science and economy
Doesn't the force of gravity become equal to the centrifigual force as to why there is weightlessness in space?
i don't undestand the part where you do 1.5X10 (-10)N
Thanks sir
how did he get 1.5?
Thank you for your video!!!!
IN you example of you standing on the moon...you used just the R value for the moon. Why did you not use the R value for yourself? (yes I know the difference is very small but correct is correct. )
What? How did you even get 1.5*10^-10 from this?
Thank youuu
If all objects have a gravitational pull, if we add more objects/mass to the equation dose it still work. For example the mass of you + the earth+ the tree next to me + my house would it still work and make sense
Thank you🤗
Is that 78kg the mass of somebody on the surface???
isn't newtons a measurement of weight, not gravitational pull? did you mean that the objects that were 3 Kg would weigh
1.5*10^-10 newtons under each others gravitational force? other than that small miscommunication this is a good explanation on the math.
Wow wonderful 😍😍😍 thanks alot...Aparin
YOUR VIDEO HELPS ME SO MUCH ! THANKH YOU (:
Four
I have only seen the Newton described as kg*m/s^2. How do we get (m/kg)^2?
what if not all objects fall to earth at 9.8m/s, but close since the objects' gravity is too minuscule to alter the speed.
Thanks so much,
I wish class like this everyday.
Can you add another "m" to numerator? If calculating for 3 different masses
That possible?
Nice
As the video came to an end I realized I’m severely screwed
Hey, I'm kinda lost .... First you got 6.67×10^-11× 2.25 and then it became 1.5× 10^-10N
How plz
Will we get the same answer by using w= mg
Got Kevin De Bruyne explaining physics before gta 6
really useful one
thnk uuu
Immanuvel Lohith
Everyone appreciates him for this explanation but newton has already explained it years ago......
Not only is his explanation convenient, being on UA-cam, he also explains it in a manner that allows people of all intellectuality to understand. Obviously Newton is to credit, but then all teachers have no significance if they’re judged by “originality”.
@@nyorigin9457 but still everyone praises him as if he founded it there is a lot of difference in finding and explaining.
@@fakir1264Everyone knows that Isaac Newton discover how to calculate this but this guy posted a helpful tutorial which is why everyone is praising him, any other dumb questions fuckwad?
I wasn’t around in 1687! I’am now!
I'm leving in 2024 tho😂