Just give them Reaves already. Lavine is an all star, and is better than Reaves at everything, incl defense. We already have Christie and Knecht to take his min. Time to sell high!
They are overpriced and underperformed, which is why there are available. Why repeat the Mozgov situation, based on the same driver, playing with LeBron will raise their ceiling? It didn’t work with Mozgov, nor Westbrook, so why the driver to try the same “plan” again, for overpriced players? If we have learned nothing from the past few champions, they had two way players and depth to sustain them through the season but also have players that were capable during the playoff. LeBron is doing his thang in the Olympics and picking up heavy minutes, there is a reasonable expectation for that toll to carry into the season with Bron and maybe AD. If the players that are brought in can only be successful if our big two are available. Injuries are a part of the game and we have to prioritize talent and athleticism, and avoid high dollar players that cannot lead or sustain momentum. The salary cap situation is just another element to consider, especially if these players have been tried to move for two years, and are still with their roster. Part 2, consider Jeremy Grant, a talented overpriced player, that knows there is a spotlight with playing in LA, so it seems he is low key pushing not being traded…
Get it done rob. Zach is a bucket and he won’t have to shoulder the heavy lifting alone he will have Lebron and A.D. if you keep vando you can hide his defensive side and he would be less likely to get hurt i think. You can open up more roster spots if you traded for him too
i have a mock trade i think its a good trade in my opinion bkn, charlotte and lakers lakers recieve: nick richards, dennis schroeder and cam johnson nets recieve: dlo, rui hachimura and wood, 2029 top 3 protected 1st via lakers 2030 pick swap unprotected 1st via lakers charlotte recieve: cam reddish and j. hayes and two 2nd rd pick via brooklyn charolte
Me personally if it was Clint or vuecivix I take Nikola big body can just bang and at least he decent rebounder and shooter but I think we need a center but I don’t think those are good options
Only way I’d do a Lavine trade is if there was a 2nd trade for a starter on the horizon After seeing all what the Warriors offered for Lauri. I think Reaves JHS Hayes and all of our picks for Lauri kills their offer LeBron Lavine Vando Lauri AD That makes a champion team for sure. But if team remains as Lavine and AR in the backcourt it’s losing trade
@@lordwiz2236 Lavine would be Rui Gabe DLo as said in the vid. And no that offer for Lauri obv won’t be done just saying that’s what another team offered. The lakers can blow that trade out of the water
I’m not for lakers trade because while you have alll the picks to trade you don’t have any player salary left to make a trade what are you going to trade Vando after him not for that me personally
its not happening the bulls are basically giving lavine away and there are no takers including lakers his contract is too much for too many years give it up
Lavine would be a horrible move, too big of a contract, injury concerns, defensive liability, shot chucker, question mark in the playoffs. Why should we gut our roster of decent sized contracts to get his albatross of a contract and likely depreciating value. Hard pass
One of the few here talking sense. Why in the HELL would you want an injury prone guard that has a bloated contract...this is why folks laugh at Laker "fans". Their delusional.
Thats the move ive been waiting for. Its the perfect move. The real ones know that he wasnt injured last year he jus wasnt bout to go to detroit lol
Just give them Reaves already. Lavine is an all star, and is better than Reaves at everything, incl defense. We already have Christie and Knecht to take his min. Time to sell high!
Reaves for : ,,Deandre .
Exactly
Lavine to the Lakers PLEASE!!!
@@user-ez7sd7jb5p HECK no lavine is bad your giving up your whole roster for him. F no
They are overpriced and underperformed, which is why there are available. Why repeat the Mozgov situation, based on the same driver, playing with LeBron will raise their ceiling? It didn’t work with Mozgov, nor Westbrook, so why the driver to try the same “plan” again, for overpriced players? If we have learned nothing from the past few champions, they had two way players and depth to sustain them through the season but also have players that were capable during the playoff.
LeBron is doing his thang in the Olympics and picking up heavy minutes, there is a reasonable expectation for that toll to carry into the season with Bron and maybe AD. If the players that are brought in can only be successful if our big two are available. Injuries are a part of the game and we have to prioritize talent and athleticism, and avoid high dollar players that cannot lead or sustain momentum. The salary cap situation is just another element to consider, especially if these players have been tried to move for two years, and are still with their roster.
Part 2, consider Jeremy Grant, a talented overpriced player, that knows there is a spotlight with playing in LA, so it seems he is low key pushing not being traded…
As a 3rd option Zach Lavine will be very huge for the Lakers. I've been espousing for the Lakers to make this move for quite some time already.
Think of zach and Bron in transition scary sight. Zach as the third option less load lower chance of injury. I think it’s perfect
Get it done rob. Zach is a bucket and he won’t have to shoulder the heavy lifting alone he will have Lebron and A.D. if you keep vando you can hide his defensive side and he would be less likely to get hurt i think. You can open up more roster spots if you traded for him too
I think this is a much better move than grant for some reason even if he’s more expensive.
Nikola Vucevic to Lakers ❤
This is the move. But I think they need and should keep DLO. And then they’ll be scary.
go get zack
i have a mock trade i think its a good trade in my opinion
bkn, charlotte and lakers
lakers recieve: nick richards, dennis schroeder and cam johnson
nets recieve: dlo, rui hachimura and wood, 2029 top 3 protected 1st via lakers 2030 pick swap unprotected 1st via lakers
charlotte recieve: cam reddish and j. hayes and two 2nd rd pick via brooklyn
charolte
Lakers wont do anything that fans think would be a solid move to be a title contender. Unfortunately, Lakers will do something that makes less sense.
Me personally if it was Clint or vuecivix I take Nikola big body can just bang and at least he decent rebounder and shooter but I think we need a center but I don’t think those are good options
Only way I’d do a Lavine trade is if there was a 2nd trade for a starter on the horizon
After seeing all what the Warriors offered for Lauri. I think Reaves JHS Hayes and all of our picks for Lauri kills their offer
LeBron
Lavine
Vando
Lauri
AD
That makes a champion team for sure. But if team remains as Lavine and AR in the backcourt it’s losing trade
But Lauri is already warrior !? And how will you get lavine ?
@@lordwiz2236 Lavine would be Rui Gabe DLo as said in the vid. And no that offer for Lauri obv won’t be done just saying that’s what another team offered. The lakers can blow that trade out of the water
Trading Gabe would be a bad idea.who is going to guard d'aron fox or the brunsons of the world.@@RWor1d
I heard lakers getting Tatum?!
Can lavine defend? Can defend a though Wing? Otherwise you Need to stay away from him.. and in any case not more than One pick..
Lavine is extremely injury prone. Lakers will become a Mash unit with AD. Lavine, Vucevic, and Vando.
Lavine is everything the lakers need. They need to get him now
Give me an ideal package for Lavine and then give me a 8-9 man rotation after the trade
lavine probably gonna tske a lot of rotation player he is not bad player the contracr is just bad
I’m not for lakers trade because while you have alll the picks to trade you don’t have any player salary left to make a trade what are you going to trade Vando after him not for that me personally
His salary is bad for us ..please no , our flexibility will be dead. And his playing style wont suit us i feel 😕😔
😂😂😂😂what flexibility?? the lakers are already stuck, can’t even pick up free agents, ya just sound ridiculous
its not happening the bulls are basically giving lavine away and there are no takers including lakers his contract is too much for too many years give it up
Lavine would be a horrible move, too big of a contract, injury concerns, defensive liability, shot chucker, question mark in the playoffs. Why should we gut our roster of decent sized contracts to get his albatross of a contract and likely depreciating value. Hard pass
Recycled
he cant stay healthy so why get him
No please not lavine his contract is the second worst behind Ben Simmons lavine I nowhere near worth giving up assets
One of the few here talking sense. Why in the HELL would you want an injury prone guard that has a bloated contract...this is why folks laugh at Laker "fans". Their delusional.
I swear the lakers have some of the dumbest fans in the league when it comes to basketball