I have already seen dozens of channels on UA-cam that show chess games and finally your channel is the first one that shows the game at exactly the right pace and is pleasant to watch, I subscribed, thank you
Fischer was becoming a star in the chess world when he became a grand master at age 15. He was quick to notice, when he would go to a chess tournament, he would always win, get a trophy and a very small percentage of the take, whereas the organizer would take the lion's share. So he let it be known that if the winner's share was not much, he would not show up. The organizers realized they had to increase the share because when Fischer said he wasn't going to come to a certain chess tournament and why, the attendance was a tiny fraction of what it could be. So the winner's share was greatly increased. This meant the difference between Fischer staying in a motel instead of a five star hotel. Before Fischer came on the scene, tournament chess players winners did not make much.
Yes! Which is why he almost didn't show to play Spassky in the 1972 World Championship. His demolishing of his opponents in the Candidates tournament was a statement that he not only had been the highest rated player for years, but that he was unofficially the best player in the world. Being a world champion to him meant little if the prize money didn't fit the accolade.
Fischer was a genius chess fanatic! Everyone in the chess world was afraid of playing Fischer except for Tal and Spassky. Fischer even spent his leisure time studying chess and learned different languages so that he could read the commentary in foreign chess magazines.
Morphy Tal Alekhine Kasparov had More beautiful games than Fischer!! Stockfish 16 would beat Fischer 999-1 easily! Fischer beat the weakest chess World champion Boris Spassky only 17 wins 10 losses! Capablanca would beat Spassky easily 8 wins 6 draws zero losses! Carlsen would beat Spassky easily 6 wins 6 draws zero losses! The highest tournament elo rating score is Fabiano Caruana 8,5/10 StLouis scoring 3080 elo rating! Karpov 11/13 Linares 1994 elo 3040! Fischer his best tournament score only 2990!! Karpov has won over 160 super grand Master tournaments! Fischer won zero! Fischer was Second in Santa Monica 1966 behind blunder maker Spassky! Fischer did not won Havanna 1965!!
The true beauty of chess is the enormous complexity after the standard 10-15 moves. Rapid chess allows the players to get into the "deep think" part of the game quickly. At this point it's no longer a memory game, but thoroughly taxes the brain to perform extremely complex computations. This is why computer chess programs can beat the best human chess players on the planet. ♟️
Se derrotaron mutuamente la misma cantidad de veces. Si mal no recuerdo, cuatro veces cada uno. Tal ganó cuando Fischer era todavía muy joven; y Fischer ganó cuando Tal ya tenía cáncer; y fumaba y tomaba ya sin control.
@@davidkaufman18 it's a rook Vs. A knight and aTal was up a pawn but Fisher was about to wipe them and he could pass the pawns... I probably have like 300 rating in chess and I know that. Lol
Tal resigned because he has no moves. Every knight move gives away the knight, Kd8 makes little sense and pushing the b-pawn loses to Rb7. White can collect blacks h-pawn without having to worry about blacks b-pawn.
@@vetiarvind 1. guarding from or preventing the spread or occurrence of disease or infection. 2. tending to prevent or ward off . Not condom please 😅 regards !
No hace falta que aclare que usted sabe poco de ajedrez, si admite que no entendió por qué Tal abandonó, ya es suficiente para que nos demos cuenta. Por otro lado paso a explicarle a grandes rasgos el motivo por el cual el Mago de Riga inclinó su rey: la posición es totalmente ganadora para el blanco porque las negras están en zugzwang, perderán rápidamente sus peones del flanco dama y el caballo negro luego será "cazado" por la torre blanca y además el rey negro está prácticamente en una posición de mate. Son tres poderosas razones para abandonar sin ningún cargo de conciencia. Eso es todo.
About 2:45 in idk why Nd4 was not a good move to save knight and protect bishop until you move it again??? 2800 the field must have been sweet as SaraLee.😅
If black played knight takes bishop, instead of f6 to f5, he would go for an easy draw. But winning a match with a million draws, like people do today, was not Tal's style
Genau so muss es sein: keine schwachsinnige Zwangsbeschallung, langsame Bewegung der Steine und kein Kommentar - selber denken. That's exactly how it should be: no brainless torturing noise, slow motion of the pieces and no comment - making think yourself.
I remember these well. I used to play lots of chess. I have used those opening moves many times. Both white and black. The opening with King pawn two spaces is to use Queen early. But it can also be too aggressive at times
It is not to use the queen early. The main purpose of pawn to e4 is to occupy the center and open up the diagonals for the bishop. Pawn to d4 also is to occupy the center however it leads to more strategic closed games. Pawn to e4 leads to more open sharp tactical games. Opening basic principles are occupy the center ,develop your pieces and castle king to safety. Bringing the queen out early in most cases is not a very good move but there are exceptions.
@@queensgambit4982 the analysis was by either Fisher or Spasky. I forget which. but a pro said it wax in part to open and use Queen early! Early weapon. So I must disagree with you .
I am a chess lover and have seen many chess games, but this game seemed to me one of the best! Fischer and Tal are both great masters, but why are they defending today in chess 🌍 that Magnus Carlsen would easily beat Fischer?
Fischer was brilliant at chess WELL before the emergance and dominance of chess engines. If Magnus had been born during the Fischer era he most certainly would not easily have beaten Fischer. Before Fischer the russians had dominated chess for 20 odd years and along came Fischer who single handedly took them all on collectively and won convincingly!
@@iankirk9097 всеравно... можно сказать что Фишер был в месте взятий Человек+ компьютер "" Он сам сказал когда победил и стал чемпионом----"" Это лишь Теория и хороший память, людям кажется что это "" море возможностей "" но есть только один правильный ход!!"""""....the computer sometimes plays uselessly, but Fischer said that in order to play well you need to know theories and have a good memory, then there is only "" one correct move ""....
Fisher had the whole Russian team trying to take draws because points won world title , being fisher played alone no other American was good enough to make it this far . What this generation think that chess has evolved in America but it hasn’t no matter who comes up they say he would of beat fisher , shows how great Bobby was he played in 1962 took this long for them to even have someone they think could beat him. They wouldn’t Bobby is the king the rest of the world player’s could only be the prince ..💯
Fischer teve mais de 3000 de rating...como fizeram pra dizer de 2780,isso nao eh verdade...pra calcular deveria calcular o rating de todos que ele jogou e na epoca nao tonha esse calculo...
@@eduardoroman2691 e o que me diz de fischer jogando no icc 2000/01...onde desfaz de todos os conceitos do xadrez moderno em um show de como jogar xadrez desfazendo de toda teoria moderna...fischer em seu ultimo legado deixa nos grd licao de xadrez que levaremos anos e ate os computadores algoritmos mais modernos para entender tal jogo...fischer deu um xequemate no xadrez...
@@bobogrosso2180 As I said as Tal dominated in 1959 , Fischer was 16... Tal is not in the top in anything.. 51 years old Botvinnik has defeated Tal in 1961.. Also plenty of other players would have easily beaten Tal.. Botvinnik showed the world how to best Tal, Kortschnoi has beaten Tal easily, his crazy sacrifices wasn't much of a use against him. Fischer in his prime would crash Tal with ease..
@@euclideszoto997 Who knows, after losing to old Botvinnik in 1961, Tal has never been able to qualify for championship final.. Fischer in his prime in 1971 - 72 stood head and shoulder above Tal..
@@barracuda7018 What is your issue? Why do you refer to Botvinnik as old Botvinnik? Tal suffered from kidney disease at a young age and his lifestyle definitely didn't help. As for Fischer he stood head and shoulders over everyone in 71-72. What's the dispute? Who's arguing that? Even Korchnoi and Karpov admitted Fischer was the strongest player.
Жаль, что предвидеть поражение Михаила Таля в конце видео я не умею, в отличие от него самого. Хорошо бы каким-нибудь способом понимать, какой именно конец для себя предвидят гроссмейстеры, потому что для непосвящённых это выглядит, как оборванный в конце кинофильм. Досадно. И таких обрываний в шахматных партиях очень много.
Shay~ If you look at this final position, Bobby was going to clean the board with his rook. It then would have been a rook and 2 pawns against a knight. At this high level of play, the end is obvious, and Bobby was going to win. Most impressive at this age. Bobby would then go on to be the greatest chess genius in the history of the world. Sure, people will debate that, but, in my expert opinion, Robert James Fischer was the zenith of genius- right next to Albert Einstein. ♟️
@@gregoriopalofuego9808urt Godel and Alan Turing could rival Einstein in terms of creative genius. EDIT: And Russell was no slouch, not to mention Ramanujan
People don't realize Fischer was the ONLY modern day GENIUS who happened to play chess way better than any of this opponents, and the ONLY other person we could say that about EVER was Paul Morphy.
Why not you eat the position in chess rd6 X re6 then nx re6, white is win in chess because, queen move f6 ne6 move again nf8 and move f6 white is win this games in chess , grand master , queen move , h6, is wrong move in chess , thanks you ,
Baddest American thing on wheels for decades. Couldn't get the nod from the people he wanted approval from the most. Died at a ripe old age amongst the natives of Europe.
Всё таки всухую, без короткого анализа основных идей и т.д.... по ходу игры, это формат "video-энциклопедии " партий, вообще(?),а не жанр популяризации лучших шахматных партий ~ для всех!
You forgot to mention Fischer was like Alekhine a bloody uncredible Jew-heater. Despite his genious in chess he would never had get so many prices, recognitionm applaus as he did.
@Tokisamright, You can see brilliance of Bobby Fischer in this match also.. (1)The style in which Bobby's King advanced towards opponent's King. (2)The manner in which, 3 ridiculous Pawns (Of Thal) ,forced to give ,cover-up for Bobby's King.(8:44 to 9:30).
Really enjoyed these type of chess games videos with just silence in the background
I agree! And with enough time between moves to understand them.
Please visit my channel too for chess matches
Me too
I actually thought Bobby was going to lose 😆
Agree
I have already seen dozens of channels on UA-cam that show chess games and finally your channel is the first one that shows the game at exactly the right pace and is pleasant to watch, I subscribed, thank you
ua-cam.com/video/Jn2yJgJkk3w/v-deo.htmlsi=vC93sK8LLdlIPfrX
Fischer was becoming a star in the chess world when he became a grand master at age 15. He was quick to notice, when he would go to a chess tournament, he would always win, get a trophy and a very small percentage of the take, whereas the organizer would take the lion's share. So he let it be known that if the winner's share was not much, he would not show up. The organizers realized they had to increase the share because when Fischer said he wasn't going to come to a certain chess tournament and why, the attendance was a tiny fraction of what it could be. So the winner's share was greatly increased. This meant the difference between Fischer staying in a motel instead of a five star hotel. Before Fischer came on the scene, tournament chess players winners did not make much.
He was 13
I feel he did the right thing, not only for himself , but also helped the future players from greedy corporations.
@@gianlucas1371Fischer was born in 1943...so he was 19 in this game.
Yes! Which is why he almost didn't show to play Spassky in the 1972 World Championship. His demolishing of his opponents in the Candidates tournament was a statement that he not only had been the highest rated player for years, but that he was unofficially the best player in the world. Being a world champion to him meant little if the prize money didn't fit the accolade.
@@johnnypastrana6727 ups xD
4 -4 a draw between these 2 players. Tal is one of best players ever. Only surpassed by Carlsen.
carlsen doesn't surpass nobody of old generation....and Tal?? don't even think
Carlsen is behind a lot of old players, just because they didn't have the tools Magnus has now, technology helped him a LOT (the engine,etc)
No -- but he does surpass greats like Tal & Fischer in chess engine usage😎
Fischer was a genius chess fanatic! Everyone in the chess world was afraid of playing Fischer except for Tal and Spassky. Fischer even spent his leisure time studying chess and learned different languages so that he could read the commentary in foreign chess magazines.
Man I would have loved to play him 😂
They said probably suffered from Asperger Syndrome in his life, do you agree
@@Insidia85 "Dr Todd Grande" UA-cam channel analysed Bobby Fischers mental health. Worth watching.
Профсоюз. Для шахматистов.
Mislis naucio je srpsko-hrvatski ❤
Good gift for us the presentation of games like this, in an interesting format
And without an engine, he is an engine 🚂🚒 ,.,.,. In my book he's the greatest.
Great who?
Fischer
@@rakkhnaka
It's obvious he's referring to the winner of this game.
♟️
@@gregoriopalofuego9808 Thank you, I would have loved to see Fischer vs Carlson, oh well 😂
Morphy Tal Alekhine Kasparov had More beautiful games than Fischer!! Stockfish 16 would beat Fischer 999-1 easily! Fischer beat the weakest chess World champion Boris Spassky only 17 wins 10 losses! Capablanca would beat Spassky easily 8 wins 6 draws zero losses! Carlsen would beat Spassky easily 6 wins 6 draws zero losses! The highest tournament elo rating score is Fabiano Caruana 8,5/10 StLouis scoring 3080 elo rating! Karpov 11/13 Linares 1994 elo 3040! Fischer his best tournament score only 2990!! Karpov has won over 160 super grand Master tournaments! Fischer won zero! Fischer was Second in Santa Monica 1966 behind blunder maker Spassky! Fischer did not won Havanna 1965!!
incredible... I thought Fischer was lost most of the game.....half his moves surprised me.....
He probably was a better chess player than you are.
Ne komlikovana partija Talj je bio bolji do sredisnjice ali zavrsnicu nije odigrao najpreciznije
@@jansnauwaert1785Undoubtedly...😂
I like the way he used the king in aggression
Очень странный ход пешкой😮, вместо хода конем
Amazing game by 19 year old Robert James Fischer against recently dethroned world champion Tal, 1 year removed from the world championship title.
Interesting match. I question some of the moves.
excelente
Fisher drew attention to the one flaw in chess: it's a memory test - at least in terms of the openings. The game needs a new beginning....
Capablanca drew attention to it before Fischer. He even proposed changes, like having a board with more squares and two kings to be taken.
The true beauty of chess is the enormous complexity after the standard 10-15 moves.
Rapid chess allows the players to get into the "deep think" part of the game quickly.
At this point it's no longer a memory game, but thoroughly taxes the brain to perform extremely complex computations.
This is why computer chess programs can beat the best human chess players on the planet.
♟️
I would really appreciate it very much if there is an analysis bar by stockfish or any strong engines.
Both are GOAT. Tal also defeated fischer another time
Tal defeated Fischer the first 4 games they ever played.
Таль выиграл у Фишера когда Фишер был совсем зелёный (сопляк) а на пике Фишер разгромил и Таля и всех остальных, он один громил весь ссср.
@@user-po5zh2pk8sasombroso 😮
Y gracias por iluminarnos bro
Фишер Фишер. Фантастика
Que paliza de Fischer. Aunque Tal le ha ganado alguna veces. Alto altísimo nivel de juego d los 2.
Se derrotaron mutuamente la misma cantidad de veces. Si mal no recuerdo, cuatro veces cada uno. Tal ganó cuando Fischer era todavía muy joven; y Fischer ganó cuando Tal ya tenía cáncer; y fumaba y tomaba ya sin control.
Fischer is very genious
LITRALLY WATCHED WHOLE VEDIO IN 2X😂
Tal really played nicely
Je ne comprends pas certains choix de Tal, que je considère comme un génie des échecs.
Moi aussi
What can be said he’s brilliant
Both were brilliant. They defeated each other the same amount of times (4).
Hi BRO, have your channel monetization ?
When it hit 4:30, my thought was "oh,man. We have a whole new game!!!"
The fact some people dont understand why Tal Resigned.. shows why hes a GM. Although it shouldn't take a GM to know why he resigned.
@@davidkaufman18 it's a rook Vs. A knight and aTal was up a pawn but Fisher was about to wipe them and he could pass the pawns... I probably have like 300 rating in chess and I know that. Lol
Fischer lived and breathed only chess. He was once asked if he also dreamt chess and his answer was, "No, never!"
Why did Tal resign in this position? I don't see the continuation 🙈
They saw things we couldn't see
me too I don't see why he gives up, would need an explanation by the moves to be made
Tal resigned because he has no moves. Every knight move gives away the knight, Kd8 makes little sense and pushing the b-pawn loses to Rb7. White can collect blacks h-pawn without having to worry about blacks b-pawn.
Thanks guys. Much appreciated 👍
Once the rook moves the knight will be free though
11:34 Rf7
What a prophylactic chess performance ! Awesome
do you know what prophylactic even means? Sounds like someone acting smart.
@@vetiarvind 1. guarding from or preventing the spread or occurrence of disease or infection.
2. tending to prevent or ward off .
Not condom please 😅 regards !
Krásná partie dík zaňí .
Dou Best Attacker and Master Sacrifice ever ❤
❤❤🎉
Alguém pode explicar ? Por que o Tal desistiu ? Foi isso? Não entendi. Não entendo muito bem de xadrez.
Коррупция... Всё началось именно с шахмат!
No hace falta que aclare que usted sabe poco de ajedrez, si admite que no entendió por qué Tal abandonó, ya es suficiente para que nos demos cuenta. Por otro lado paso a explicarle a grandes rasgos el motivo por el cual el Mago de Riga inclinó su rey: la posición es totalmente ganadora para el blanco porque las negras están en zugzwang, perderán rápidamente sus peones del flanco dama y el caballo negro luego será "cazado" por la torre blanca y además el rey negro está prácticamente en una posición de mate. Son tres poderosas razones para abandonar sin ningún cargo de conciencia. Eso es todo.
@@eduardoroman2691 gracias
👍
Netherlands with an 's' at the end please 😀
Why resign? I Cant see the ending 😅
About 2:45 in idk why Nd4 was not a good move to save knight and protect bishop until you move it again??? 2800 the field must have been sweet as SaraLee.😅
If black played knight takes bishop, instead of f6 to f5, he would go for an easy draw.
But winning a match with a million draws, like people do today, was not Tal's style
If you like, you may pause ziss vee-d'yo, and try to find za move...zat Fischer played in ziss position
Why ..not sound musik and narasion ?
I love it like that makes me easier to fall asleep
Van Halen and screaming where the pieces are going, or just beautiful silence?
Genau so muss es sein: keine schwachsinnige Zwangsbeschallung, langsame Bewegung der Steine und kein Kommentar - selber denken.
That's exactly how it should be: no brainless torturing noise, slow motion of the pieces and no comment - making think yourself.
Thank you I like that! So much others chess videos with comments.....
I remember these well. I used to play lots of chess. I have used those opening moves many times. Both white and black. The opening with King pawn two spaces is to use Queen early. But it can also be too aggressive at times
It is not to use the queen early. The main purpose of pawn to e4 is to occupy the center and open up the diagonals for the bishop. Pawn to d4 also is to occupy the center however it leads to more strategic closed games. Pawn to e4 leads to more open sharp tactical games. Opening basic principles are occupy the center ,develop your pieces and castle king to safety. Bringing the queen out early in most cases is not a very good move but there are exceptions.
@@queensgambit4982 the analysis was by either Fisher or Spasky. I forget which. but a pro said it wax in part to open and use Queen early! Early weapon. So I must disagree with you .
no@@buffalorick5598
Why did he resign?
кто нибудь объясните , почему таль не взял пешку конём?зачем жертвовать ладью?
Король бы все равно сьел ладью
У Фишера в 62 году ещё не было 2780 , или вообще не было.
Siapa GOAT diantara ke 2 ini?
“Fischer is the greatest genius to descend from the chessic heavens.” - Mikhail Tal
.... #вопрос: (2:38 по таймеру, ход белых !!!) почему белые не делают ход Кc3d5 ???!!!)
Why didn't queen e4 take the pawn on g2?
Bf3 then Bc6 then Qd8, one move later Bf3 is unpleasant anyway
She is vegan perhaps
bishop was available by pawn when either queen or bishop were at threat
Почему Таль не забрал пешку на g2 3:18?
I am a chess lover and have seen many chess games, but this game seemed to me one of the best! Fischer and Tal are both great masters, but why are they defending today in chess 🌍 that Magnus Carlsen would easily beat Fischer?
Fischer was brilliant at chess WELL before the emergance and dominance of chess engines. If Magnus had been born during the Fischer era he most certainly would not easily have beaten Fischer. Before Fischer the russians had dominated chess for 20 odd years and along came Fischer who single handedly took them all on collectively and won convincingly!
@@chrism6446 I always thought that Maradona is better! ...
@@iankirk9097 всеравно... можно сказать что Фишер был в месте взятий Человек+ компьютер ""
Он сам сказал когда победил и стал чемпионом----"" Это лишь Теория и хороший память, людям кажется что это "" море возможностей "" но есть только один правильный ход!!"""""....the computer sometimes plays uselessly, but Fischer said that in order to play well you need to know theories and have a good memory, then there is only "" one correct move ""....
Fisher had the whole Russian team trying to take draws because points won world title , being fisher played alone no other American was good enough to make it this far . What this generation think that chess has evolved in America but it hasn’t no matter who comes up they say he would of beat fisher , shows how great Bobby was he played in 1962 took this long for them to even have someone they think could beat him. They wouldn’t Bobby is the king the rest of the world player’s could only be the prince ..💯
Magnusss ❤️
All I can see is Positional Advantages,
من الذي فاز؟؟
Bobby Fischer
What happened at 13:22
When a pawn reaches the other end it can convert to a Queen
Fischer teve mais de 3000 de rating...como fizeram pra dizer de 2780,isso nao eh verdade...pra calcular deveria calcular o rating de todos que ele jogou e na epoca nao tonha esse calculo...
Fanboy?
Fischer llegó a 2780 como máximo puntaje Elo, ya estaba en vigencia el sistema, y su opinión carece de toda importancia.
@@eduardoroman2691 e o que me diz de fischer jogando no icc 2000/01...onde desfaz de todos os conceitos do xadrez moderno em um show de como jogar xadrez desfazendo de toda teoria moderna...fischer em seu ultimo legado deixa nos grd licao de xadrez que levaremos anos e ate os computadores algoritmos mais modernos para entender tal jogo...fischer deu um xequemate no xadrez...
@@adpister64 Confirmado: fan boy.
@@eduardoroman2691 o que eh fanboy?...nao entendi...
Why not D× g2?
Sorry,i' m hillbilly!...
Shiiit...!
Position of chackmate is nit shown...!
Fischer was much stronger than Tal..The last time he lost to Tal he was 16...1959.
After 1960 Tal was a piece of cake for Bobby..
They are equal in score!! anda Tal is the TOP in tactics!
Unfortunately Tal's health was becoming an issue then.
@@bobogrosso2180 As I said as Tal dominated in 1959 , Fischer was 16... Tal is not in the top in anything.. 51 years old Botvinnik has defeated Tal in 1961.. Also plenty of other players would have easily beaten Tal.. Botvinnik showed the world how to best Tal, Kortschnoi has beaten Tal easily, his crazy sacrifices wasn't much of a use against him. Fischer in his prime would crash Tal with ease..
@@euclideszoto997 Who knows, after losing to old Botvinnik in 1961, Tal has never been able to qualify for championship final.. Fischer in his prime in 1971 - 72 stood head and shoulder above Tal..
@@barracuda7018 What is your issue? Why do you refer to Botvinnik as old Botvinnik? Tal suffered from kidney disease at a young age and his lifestyle definitely didn't help. As for Fischer he stood head and shoulders over everyone in 71-72. What's the dispute? Who's arguing that? Even Korchnoi and Karpov admitted Fischer was the strongest player.
Nice and slow.
You are welcome 🤗
Mat in 21 moves
Still think Fisher's first rook move was a mistake thought he had lost it there
Minute 4:25? Why?
Rajan koranpeedika
Watch it at 2x speed lmao
Moves of those great chess players are hard to understand. If you understand with 2x speed, that means you are very good at chess ♟️ 👏
It's wrong reting 1962
जिस स्थिती मेघालय का रिजाइन दिखाया है वह समझ से परे है?
Жаль, что предвидеть поражение Михаила Таля в конце видео я не умею, в отличие от него самого. Хорошо бы каким-нибудь способом понимать, какой именно конец для себя предвидят гроссмейстеры, потому что для непосвящённых это выглядит, как оборванный в конце кинофильм. Досадно. И таких обрываний в шахматных партиях очень много.
So why did he resign?
Shay~
If you look at this final position, Bobby was going to clean the board with his rook. It then would have been a rook and 2 pawns against a knight. At this high level of play, the end is obvious, and Bobby was going to win.
Most impressive at this age.
Bobby would then go on to be the greatest chess genius in the history of the world.
Sure, people will debate that, but, in my expert opinion, Robert James Fischer was the zenith of genius- right next to Albert Einstein.
♟️
Rook Chess!!
Then to left, threatening uninvoidable mate!
„Gregoripapadopoulossomething“ is telling bullshit!
@@openclassics The bullshit is you.
@@gregoriopalofuego9808urt Godel and Alan Turing could rival Einstein in terms of creative genius.
EDIT: And Russell was no slouch, not to mention Ramanujan
@@VidaBlue317
Vida. Okay. We have a list started. Let me add Jimi Hendrix.
🎸
Is me or did I see Tal have mate twice
just you
3:50 why black queen do not eat white pawn?
Same question!
If a genius did that you can not expect normal to understand that. Do you ?
@@rahulpratapsingh239Offcourse.
People don't realize Fischer was the ONLY modern day GENIUS who happened to play chess way better than any of this opponents, and the ONLY other person we could say that about EVER was Paul Morphy.
That was a dumb statement.😂
Back in the days , when there was no anal beads to manipulate this beautiful game
Shy game. Too much attention in some steps. The result is not exciting.
Tal the best of the best!
but he lost terribly here😁
@@PP1969GR it doesn't matter
@@user-oi8hm5iu6n of course
Why not you eat the position in chess rd6 X re6 then nx re6, white is win in chess because, queen move f6 ne6 move again nf8 and move f6 white is win this games in chess , grand master , queen move , h6, is wrong move in chess , thanks you ,
Baddest American thing on wheels for decades. Couldn't get the nod from the people he wanted approval from the most. Died at a ripe old age amongst the natives of Europe.
He was ethnically Jewish. And even pissed them off.
Well that's a ridiculous mistake for the content provider to make. In the photo Tal is White, in the game he's black.
Молодец, мальчишка, переиграл Таля.
Saben cómo termino Bobby Fisher, pobre y en la calle
Ужасный формат: даже на двойной скорости ходы передаются невероятно медленно и никакого разбора.
galing namn ako hindi ako.marunong nyan.. alcab
Why he resigned
Аллё сапожник , звук , где звук ?
Всё таки всухую, без короткого анализа основных идей и т.д.... по ходу игры, это формат "video-энциклопедии " партий, вообще(?),а не жанр популяризации лучших шахматных партий ~ для всех!
Promo-SM
Chew you up and spit you out
Boring exchange game to end game lame
No offence. I could have played this match better.
Tal was a alienigena!
You forgot to mention Fischer was like Alekhine a bloody uncredible Jew-heater. Despite his genious in chess he would never had get so many prices, recognitionm applaus as he did.
Wrost chess game 😂😂😮
Tal choked
tal le gano mas veces a fisher en todo el acumulado entre ellos
No! Fischer has won more games between them!
I think bobby fisher was over hyped and propagated to push the cold war upmanship.
Hahahahahaha. Greatest of all time. Uncontested
@Tokisamright,
You can see brilliance of Bobby Fischer in this match also..
(1)The style in which Bobby's King advanced towards opponent's King.
(2)The manner in which, 3 ridiculous Pawns (Of Thal) ,forced to give ,cover-up for Bobby's King.(8:44 to 9:30).
Задолбали Фишером. Брал не столько мастерством, сколько еврейской наглостью.
This game was not that good enough to win. The end should be otherwise better than the last move.
I saw a couple of better moves that Fischer could have played.
Why, why did black not take white s rook on the right corner? 😳
These guys aren’t nearly as god as I thought. Especially Fischer.
Why didn’t Tal play Qxg2 when he had the chance
В конце ладью бездарно отдал.
Зачем он пешку отдал просто так.сам заигрался победа была в кармане а тут проигрышь