A couple other ideas that were rejected were installing a tube system under the foundation to freeze the water in the subsoil, controlling the temperature according to the lean, or using hydraulically injected foam to correct the lean in conjunction with injecting a water-cured polymer to harden the subsoil.
Compensation grouting (aka compaction or hydrofracture grouting) with cement is what I would have done since I'm a grouting engineer but honestly it would've been similar in cost and schedule to what they did. I've lifted a penstock at a power generating station using cement and sodium silicate. 3 months to lift 3/4" with a goal of 1". With steady gradual progress, its possible to react to geoinstrument feedback to target specific points to lift and others to leave alone. The structures took weeks to react to the initial consolidation and kept moving upward for weeks after I completed the work to reach the 1" total lift target. Compensation grouting with water reactive polyurethane is hard to control because polyurethane expands so much and doesn't necessarily find water to react with at the time of injection, especially in clay. The soil and foundation may take weeks to react to injection (as measured on geoinstruments), so the rate and location of lifting is unpredictable, and differential and overrcompensation happens. People do compensation with polyurethane successfully, but it carries risk.
I was thinking that they should just mud jack it. I suspect my home brew sidewalk repair experiance is not adequate for this scale of project. @@davidschoon8254
The freezing concept was used in Amsterdam during the construction of the Noord-Zuid Lijn (North-South Line). It runs underneath the historic city center and everything is built on wooden poles as it was originally a marsh. Some huge, historic buildings risked collapse, so they froze a massive section to drill through safely.
I was there in 1987, 3 years before the tower was closed for repairs. It is a terribly disorienting building to climb the stairs to the top, not only because of the lean that causes you to (correctly) feel like you are leaning in every direction in sequence, like someone terribly drunk, but also because the centuries of foot traffic on the steps have caused them to wear out unevenly, so they are dished out where the feet have trafficked the most. Plus the single narrow spiral stair has both people climbing up and people climbing down at the same time. It was also ver scary when you got to the top, because from the lowest side of the platform, you could not see the base of the tower beneath you, the lean was so great. But I'm glad I had the opportunity and really glad it did not collapse while I was in the tower. I'm so happy it has been stabilized now and future generations will have a chance to experience it themselves.
I remember when they were doing this.. we watched an hour (whole first period) of Channel One news once a week in school during home period(the first class).. Other days we had to watch 15 minutes of it, instead of whatever class we were in. Everyone liked it because it was far more fun to watch TV than be bored being re-taught things we've learned before. Channel One news covered plenty of interesting things.. But they also only covered anything political from 1 side of the spectrum.. which is pretty underhanded. I'm sure it's great to feed propaganda to kids when it's from the side you agree with.. But how would you feel if it was coming from the side you didn't agree with, and all adolescents were being forced to watch it in school? That's a very dangerous precedent to set. Feeding 12-17 year-olds very select news in a VERY politically biased way. Being presented by "cool kids" who are 18-21 and meant to be interpreted as role models. Talk about having no shame.
“If you’re into recreational geology & heavy construction!” 😂 I really wasn’t until I started watching your channel! Now I think about it driving down the road looking at anything that was built.
5:23 - 5:48 Sneaky, sneaky Grady!!! The Tower was increasinig in it's tilt that entire 25 seconds and I only noticed the difference when I did a quick rewind of the 20 seconds prior to 5:48 to show the stark difference once the catino was removed. Very subtle and VERY well done in your graphics - bravo!! And overall, this video was beautiful and a wonderful illustration of the tremendous, positive real world impact engineer's have on the world!!
Grady, your channel is my favorite example of why UA-cam channels are so much better than regular TV. So many old cable shows would breeze over topics and say "amazing, right?" Those shows were dumbed down and insulting; while your videos are deeply interesting and, by inspiring young people to pursue an engineering career, literally making the world a better place. Thank You!
your niche audience on YT can come and go as they please. TV is made for the masses and thus has it's flaws associated with its reach. If the TV (edu content) was indeed insulting, you wouldn't have Grady who was probably "to pursue an engineering career" from watching TV
"So many old cable shows would breeze over topics and say "amazing, right?" Yes, but you have to remember a lot of those older shows were for children, so some simplification was needed. I agree overall that the quality here can get much better than some of those old shows though
TV shows would have "experts" saying how incredible those "ancien builders" were as leaning a single degree more would have brought the tower down, then they would have make 30 more minutes saying that "we had to use computer simulation to get to that level of precision" with at least 3 people saying the same thing including an civil engineer that either isn't worth is salt or with directed questions and editing would have said that "such precision is barely attainable with the most modern techniques".
I saw the bracing of the tower when visiting Italy in the late 90s, however, I didn't get to see the actual fix being done at ground level since the work area was boarded all around. The cables clearly looked temporary, as they were not fixed permanently to the tower rather they embraced the exterior with wood planks to shield the stone from the cable. For everything I saw above the edge of the fence, I guessed they were pumping some sort of cement mix under it, not taking out soil. They did a nice trick there. Thanks for telling the story.
I was there in ‘99 and I remember this too! I was a Kid, but I still have those corny photos that my dad had me pose for, standing in the foreground with one arm up, as if I’m holding up the tower. 😅
Ditto, I was there in 2000 with my wife, and confirm the upper was strapped and tied back with cables. Great to see more info to add to the placarded info provided at site by the engineers (in English!).
@@nasonguy You mean "resident construction engineers?" As-builts are the responsibility of the resident engineers, at least for transportation projects. Design engineers (such as myself) are required to issue "Use-on-Construction" revisions.
Not very smart to start digging on that side though, clearly weakens the wrong side. Had they done it on the "high side" of the tower foundation it would have straightened instead of risking to tilt even more and risk collapse.
Fun fact: The engineers from Imperial College London that assisted this project had already stabilised the Queens Tower at their university in London, and later stabilised Big Ben with the same methods.
It's kind of brilliant. They built what amounts to a float foundation/spread footing that is likely the main reason the tower stayed up as long as it has while tilted.
The walls of old brick buildings are always curved. You just can't see it from the ground. But when you get on top of one and look down the wall you can see it then. You can see every brick. Makes it look taller. Modern brick faced buildings are different. The brick is just a siding. It's held up by the inner structure of the building which is blocks and steel. There's wavy metal straps called ties that hold the brick to the real wall.
I have seen the tower in person. It is not curved. It was built straight, but as it started to tilt, they readjusted the next section so it would be straight up, with a tilted base. They made three corrections to correct for the tilt.
I saw the title and thought, “What? Again?” I’m glad I didn’t miss anything as big as a second stabilization, and I’m happy to finally hear the story of how it was done.
I'm reminded of the stories a friend of mine tells. he worked construction on housing developments in Florida, and in many places, the slab foundations for houses floated on wet sand until the house was built and slowly compacted the water out. if the house was built asymmetrically, the foundation would tilt under the unbalanced load, so they had to be careful how they loaded the material onto the slab.
that is one nice thing of living in a northern climate- Michigan requires 42" of footings so that solves a lot of floating issues. not all mind you, but a lot
@@pizzaivlife here, the terrain is so varied that there is no one size fits all rule. my brother's beach house is on bedrock. there are other houses I know of, where they drove 30 foot pilings flush to the ground and poured footings on top of them.
@@pizzaivlife where grew up in Florida, ground water aquifer started at around six feet deep. You couldn’t put footings down that deep if you wanted to.
@@kenbrown2808 right, we have those issues too. It is just nice that even in good soil you have to have those 42" of footing. you can need more for structural reasons of course, but that is the starting point for anything you don't want to pop out of the ground
I just visited the leaning tower of Pisa a month ago on my honeymoon and it’s amazing thing to see in person. I learned all about its lean and foundation changes. So awesome you made a video on it! I loved it
Another video like this you could do on a many-centuries-long engineering project, albeit one that ended in failure, could be the Aztec capital/Mexico City's water and soil issues: Tenochtitlan was a giant city with Venice-like canals built on both a natural island and expanded with a grid of artificial islands over time, with a complex series of levees, aqueducts, and other systems to intake fresh water and to avoid flooding. When the city was sieged by Conquistadors and armies from other local city-states, much of that infrastructure was destroyed and Mexico City, built on the ruins, had regular issues with flooding. Eventually in the 1700s intensive draining efforts to drain the series of 5 lakes in the valley got underway (after previous management attempts) and continued to the 20th century, which backfired as it ended up almost entirely depleting the aquafer and led to the liquefaction and compaction of the loose lakebed sediment, especially as Mexico City's urban sprawl has spread over much of the former lakebed and added (millions) of tons of weight. As a result, today, Mexico City is sinking... rapidly. Some parts of the city as fast as 50 centimeters/20 inches a year, and it's not predicted to stop for many decades, and recent reports have found that it's past the point of no return already. There's constant issues with sewage lines, subways, etc breaking as a result of this, and it's renewing flooding issues while the lakes are mostly gone (save some surviving Aztec period canal systems in Xochimilco, which too are threatened by this), now it's worsening issues with retaining rainwater. Some other channels have covered this already, but I find many of the videos don't delve into the specific engineering details or all the historical context: We know the specifics of how many of the Aztec aqueducts worked (the main aqueduct which sourced water from Chapultepec for example had dual ceramic pipes with a switching mechanism) and with the specific drainage projects, yet neither has really been covered with detailed diagrams and like yet like you did here. I also find people only mention Tenochtitlan, sometimes even mistakenly showing the valley being empty aside from Teno. with it only urbanizing as Mexico City grew, despite there being hundreds of other Aztec cities in the Valley some of which had their own lake infrastructure/engineering efforts (like Texcoco's Texcotzingo waterworks system) some of which played a role in these events; and there being significant urbanization there for thousands of years before the Aztec period, like with Tlatilco, Cuicuilco, Teotihuacan, etc. So I think there's still room for you or the Wendover team you mentioned you work with to contribute to the topic in a way other people haven't done so yet. I actually work with history and archeology channels with researching and fact checking their Mesoamerican stuff and would be down to help out if you ever wanted to cover it!
Back in the early 80s I lived in Egypt and met some Italian engineers that lived in the same hotel that I was staying. I told them what I would do to fix the tower and this is exactly what I told them to do. Two years ago the History channel showed what they did. That really made my day.
At the moment in Italy we're having a very similar situation in Bologna, where one of the two towers is leaning so much they had to close part of the town center. From what I understood, the real issue is that in this case the motivation for such lean are unclear, hence there's no idea of how to act.
as far as i know bologna's ground is really muddy, and can't withstand the weight (that's why Bologna can't have a metro).... add up the traffic just driving by... stay strong Garisenda!
If it's the tower I'm thinking of, then the correct first step is probably to disassemble the tower so a new foundation can be built. Less intrusive measures may be possible, but from what I've heard the towers in the area in general were probably never on foundations fit for their size, so if the thing is to really last it needs a good foundation to be engineered, preferably with the neighboring tower getting the same treatment as soon as the first one is finished up.
2:05 *by neighbouring cities. Tuscany has a long history of city rivalries. The main ones are Pisa vs Livorno, Siena vs Firenze... But in general each city hates each other, even the smaller ones.
I watched a documentary on the Tower and in it they said there's wedges in the base and by measuring those wedges they were able to track the lean over time. They even plotted the data on a computer and showed how the tower's been moving over time. It was hilarious. It's been doing a dance back and forth.
Somewhere out in the desert we have the real London Bridge too. Some screwball bought it and shipped it over block by block. They spray painted numbers on every block so they could put it back together just the way it was. I think it's in front of some housing development? They built an artificial waterway under it so it's not just sitting in the desert. But it's really sitting in the desert now. It is rather charming. I've seen pictures of it. How many bridges get to retire and enjoy their autumn years?
@@davideastham that sounds right. It's in either Arizona or Nevada. One of those Godforsaken desert states. I think they got the bridge just as an attraction. Like look it's something other than barren desert. We have a famous bridge. The Brits were going to demolish it anyways. They needed a bigger bridge. So they happily sold it to the loon.
I don't often comment but I feel like I have to: Practical Engineering is one of, if not the best, shows I've ever watched. The content turns what might at first appear as mundane and everyday things that everyone knows about or have some reference to (e.g. highway construction for example) into genuinely interesting and fascinating pieces with excellent infographics and the topics are explained in a way that I feel appeals to both laymen and engineers alike. All while being narrated by that very soothing voice. Please keep it up ❤
i remember all the work that went into saving the tower, it was definitely a great engineering feat to save the tower. There is definitely a lot more monitoring in place and there are limits on how many people can be in the tower too. Thanks for doing a story on this
I just finished a geotechnical engineering class that had a section on consolidation. One of the really interesting things we learned about electro-osmotic consolidation is that it is triangular so the soil between the electrodes is not consolidated equally. Another really interesting thing is that electro-osmotic consolidation not only consolidates the soil but also increases the strength of the soil due to particles from the electrodes being left behind during the process. I think that it is a fascinating process that deserves its own video.
Surely this is only a temporary condition? Any zones of negative porewater pressure between electrodes should start the consolidation process in the surrounding soils due to the pressure gradient.
@@craigmcdougall3693 I just checked my notes again and I want to be clear I am not an expert in any of this but this is what I could find. The reason for the ununiform consolidation is that the voltage is highest at the anode which causes the water to flow towards the cathode. This results in the highest degree of consolidation occurring at the anode while the lowest consolidation occurs at the cathode as the water that flows out is immediately replaced. Once the power is turned off the pressure gradient dissipates but the ununiform consolidation remains. As for the permanent change in soil properties, studies showed that the Atterberg limits of the soil also changed in a triangular distribution with the highest increase occurring at the anode. The cause for this is that as the anode corrodes its ions flow into the soil in the direction of the water flow and react causing a change in soil properties.
This was an amazing video. I knew they had 'fixed' the tower but never the details. the graphics were very helpful in understanding the process. btw if you talk to the Nebula people, I would love a windows app. I have a subscription but never remember to use it.
I’ve learned more about the history of the Tower in the first 5 minutes than any other time in my life. It was always just there, and I would think about it from time to time when Superman would straighten it and then tilt it back again, angering the local craftsmen who made figurines of it. But now I realize that wouldn’t have been possible, especially since I never knew the tower was built curved. That’s so cool. This was insanely informative, but also incredibly entertaining! My family loves your content!!!
Just imagine being having worked on this in the past and seeing the new and amazing ways that modern architects carried on your work, this is awe-inspiring. I wonder what similar situations we are in that will be corrected like this in the distant future.
What a great video! The first time I went up the leaning tower was when I was 10 years old in 1970. Now, for my retirement, I am planning to stay half of the year in Pisa. That's a long lovestory. Thank you for enlightening me on my old love's health...!
My geotechnical design professor at UNH in the mid-1990s, Dr. Jean Benoit, was one of the engineers/researchers working on the stabilization project. For a work study, I helped on a few of his presentations he was giving in Italy. Nice to see it actually worked.
The Company which did this is from the Ruhr Valley. I love how the Know-How from Decades of Mining can still be very usefull in some cases, although everything Mining related has already shut down in Germany. It shows how a transition for a industry reliant Region to a Tech Region is possible. I am proud to be a part of this process :)
As an Italian who lives not so far from the tower (160km or 100mi), I've found this video amazing, I was a kid when this was done so I was not aware of how bad the things were at that time
Thank you so much for providing this high-quality video for free. I'm a Korean interested in engineering. Recently, I've been watching many English videos without subtitles to improve my English skills. Your kind narrator is very helpful to me as an English beginner.🥰
The Garisenda tower in Bologna has a similar problem. The degrees of tilt are even greater, and very recently it has been deemed dangerous after some instruments detected too much vibration
The problem is that they can't pull this trick with the Garisenda. I suspect the soil situation is similar, but the tower is embedded in a very narrow urban setting.
Somewhat similar was done to one bridge pier in Bratislava recently. It was sinking and leaning into the Danube. The bridge was being rebuilt, so they decided to inject concrete under high pressure under the pier as well as inside it to fill all cracks. Eventually the bridge pier from the year 1890 rose and tilted several centimeters, but I do not remember the numbers. It was also reinforced and extended, as two adjacent piers to one side were replaced by a single one to make the passage wider and the bridge is a bit higher above the water. Thus existing pier had to carry a higher load of the longer bridge "field" between the piers and shipping is now easier even during times with higher water levels of the Danube river. I thought they injected some concrete under pressure below the sinking side of the Tower of Pisa, but they did the opposite - they made the other side sink to compensate for the tilt. Until watching this video, I was completely ignorant, I just remember reading that the tower was somewhat "straightened" in the 1990s using modern technology.
I lived in Pisa when the consolidation project started, I could see the leaning tower from the window of my room. The building where I lived was noticeabily tilting, a marble or a ball on the floor would immediately started to roll and also any water spill on the floor would drift toward the wall. The sidewalk at the side of the building had detached from the wall. This would have been very concerning on a different city, but here it was accounted for while planning the building and no consolidation was required at that point in time. The soil in Pisa lacks stiffness to support tall buildings correctly and driving piles to the bedrock would be excessively expensive - and far beyond the capabilities of the ancient builders. In Pisa there are two further smaller leaning towers, San Michele degli Scalzi and San Nicola. The former is leaning more than the famous tower. The ancient builders found a way to keep it standing (internal arches, I'm told) despite the quite obvious foundation fault.
Thank you sir. I'm very aware of the time and efforts it takes first to be in a position to know enough so that you can even speak on this topic, but also then to professionally create and present such a well made video. I do regret Alan Alda popularizing the narrative technique of instilling a childlike wonder and portent into every word of every turn of every phrase. A large segment of your audience can't do without it, and you have rightly implemented it in gauging your listeners. Oh boy gee whiz(!), don't get me wrong; everyone with an interest in the Tower either learned something new, or solidified their previous understanding - including me with my supercilious attitude.
👏this 👏is 👏the content i wished i'd had on my TV growing up: especially as i got into my teens. these graphics and the writing are such a fantastic, accessible way to draw in a broad audience. i'm sad i didn't discover this channel earlier, but it took very little convincing to make me a huge fan, and i will be sharing this with some of my friends and peers in education (and teachers can use all the help they can get).
The tallest leaning tower in the world is still the Olympic Stadium in Montreal. It's not fallign over but it's been a white elephant also. The cost of the stadium was exhorbitant and not there's talks to add a roof at a cost of 1 billion dollars! The old roof has been out of service for years after failing. It was a kevlar fabric roof hanging down from this massive leaning tower.
@@jamesclarkson156The Millenium tower is leaning less and 1/60th of one degree. Pisa is about at 4 degree and olympic stadium at almost 45. Not the same scale
Crazy as I have worked on small projects. Thinking about a 12 year project from concept to completion is crazy. Good for saving this historic landmark.
While the structure is impressive I don't think it'd have garnered nearly the attention it has if it wasn't leaning. The lean is the main attraction with it. Straighten it out and it's just another antique building. So I can't agree with anyone that was advocating for completely straightening it. Although I might have straightened it up a bit more than they did. It's still really leaning. But I guess that's how they like it.
As Grady pointed out, it's not just leaning but also curved. They couldn't make it perfectly straight even if they wanted to. If the base was level, then it would be curved to the north, because the upper levels were built to compensate for the lean to the south.
@@jdlessl nothing is impossible. They could fix that too if they really wanted to. It isn't practical but that doesn't mean it can't be done. They could tear the whole tower down and completely rebuild it if they really wanted to. Make it straight as an arrow and you'd never know looking at it that it was done. They rebuilt Stonehenge in 1958 with heavy equipment and nobody today knows. The megalith you're familiar with didn't exist before then. People think cavemen built it. Maybe once they did, but not the site today. They put it together how they think it may have been. But it was really just a pile of rocks when they started. Some work had been done previously in 1908 I think too? But they really tore it apart and redid it in the 50s. Anything for the tourists.
This is so fascinating and cool! I didn't even realize the builders were compensating for the lean originally until you just mentioned it. What weird (and neat) facts and info on what they did to save it, how much it was tilting, and so on!
This is fascinating! I've only gotten in as far as the stages of initial construction and I'm hooked. The details on the corrections were never very well publicized. Watched it and it didn't disappoint. This was one of the most interesting projects I had never really heard details about. I've found a new YT rabbit hole to explore :)
Are you really admitting on an open forum that you don't grasp something as obvious as the fact that the Tower of Pisa has no residents, and serves no purpose other than a historical monument and tourist attraction? OR are you admitting that you're not intelligent enough to understand why that makes it different that the Millenium tower?
@@Self_Evident Nope, I grasp sarcasm just fine. But in order for your comment to actually BE sarcasm, there has to be equivalency between the Millennium tower and the tower of Pisa. Which of course, there is none. Without that, your comment isn't sarcasm, just inane nonsense.
@@andrewalexander9492 wow. the OP was making what is commonly known as "a joke". As you are plainly unfamiliar with the concept, I will say this: "jokes" are not required to be *literally* apt. For example, the fact that the LTP and the MT are centuries different in age, one is residential and the other not, is not inconsistent with the OP's comment being a "joke". Rather, the 'equivalency' is that they are both towers with an unintended lean, and both of which have been or are in the process of being unleant. I hope this helps, but as I will lay money you are an engineer, perhaps not.
I recently learned about the towers of Bologna, Italy, and in particular Garisenda Tower of the "Two Towers", which also has an extreme lean and was closed earlier this month (December 2023) for fears of a collapse. Fascinating stuff!
Hey, Grady. . . I’m finally getting around to reading your “Engineering in Plain Sight”. Awesome book. Highy recommended for curious people of ALL ages!
i literally gasped when you said that it had a safety factor of *1.07*
Рік тому+2
When I design machines that carry people, it requires a safety factor of 5 or 6 to be CE-compliant. I don't know how it is for structures, but 1.07 is _definitely_ not enough to be safe.
I've been up the tower three months ago. It's still really far leaning. I usually have no problems with climbing towers at all, but with the observation walkway at top being that far angled, it even made me pretty queasy.
It’s really quite the site in person! I visited in 1995, it had weights on the base with steel cables wrapped & pulling. Included a 45 minute trip by train to Florence. So glad they were successful restoring a safer lean to the tower!
As I recall, in 1983, Superman, after being exposed to Kryptonite that affected his personality, straightened the Leaning Tower of Pisa. But he did restore the tilt later that year after recovering from the Kryptonite effects. What effect did that have on the engineering plan to preserve the tower?
I don't like the fact that they went through all this trouble and still didn't fix the original problem. To this day it's still leaning and flawed. I mean if I just want to see a building leaning from poor workmanship I can just go to Chicago. The tower would be a lot more majestic if it was truly perfectly plumb.
Fun fact, at the moment here in Italy we are going through another situation like the one of the leaning tower of Pisa. Look up "Torre della Garisenda" in Bologna
Awesome! As a military brat in the early 90’s, got to visit. Great memory and yep, it was closed. I took a pic of the tower and made a painting from it, still have that painting, good memories.
"Tell me what you think".... I think you produced a really really fun and informative video. Well Done! Keep up the good work and I will be subscribing to Nebula... right now!
A video where I knew the ending before I even watched it! Way back in 2000, I was stationed at Camp Darby, Italy when I was in the USAF. Pisa was about 5 miles or so away. When I was there, they had the counterweights and unsightly cables attached to it; people were not allowed inside. It was a few years after I left that I learned about the augers that evacuated soil under it so that it leaned back the right way. They probably could have made it perfectly vertical using that method, but that wouldn't be any fun to have the Leaning Tower of Pisa no longer leaning....
Near where I live, there’s a medieval campanile going through a similar situation, we’ve seen lead weights used, but the authorities still haven’t proclaimed whether the operation went as expected. Let’s just say that I the last three or so months the tilt increased visibly, in THREE MONTHS
Thank you Grady, I had no idea that the tower was built with a curve to counter its existing lean. Remember when the Discovery channel made excellent documentaries? I do, and they made an episode on The Leaning Tower if Pisa. When they left it, it was just after the lead blocks went into place. I hadn't read or seen much of it since. It's nice to know that it's safe again.
I love this video as well as the others! I just received an early Christmas gift being a signed copy of engineering in plain sight from you. Despite any other gift I may revive that book is easily my favorite. You’re a true inspiration and mentor to me to be the best I can be in whatever I undertake. Keep up the great work.! Thankyou for such an amazing source of inspiration encouragement and knowledge.! 🙃🙃
Hey, Grady! Just wanted to say that I really like your channel. Whenever I start watching one of your videos I find a smile on my face and that I'm learning and enjoying myself. You're obviously doing something right! Merry Christmas from a Norwegian woodworker :-)
This is the first time ive heard anyone talk about how the shows that come on tv are just reality garbage. I loved How It's Made, Modern Marvels and other such shows that actually had educational value. I appreciate you giving a shout out to other channels some I knew like Integza and others I didn't and will be subscribing to now.
I was there in 1999 when they were doing this... (My dad is an Italian immigrant to Canada so we visit every so often). It's neat to see what they were doing in your video. Thanks!
I remember when I was in grade school back in the 60's, this topic was in a small magazine/booklet that we used to get. I believe it was called "The Weekly Reader", and it had items of news from around the world (Expo 67' seems to be a fond memory from those days). We read that scientists were trying to figure out how to stabilize the tower and freezing the ground was apparently one of the ideas brought fourth. It's odd that it took thirty years for them to finally do something.
A couple other ideas that were rejected were installing a tube system under the foundation to freeze the water in the subsoil, controlling the temperature according to the lean, or using hydraulically injected foam to correct the lean in conjunction with injecting a water-cured polymer to harden the subsoil.
Compensation grouting (aka compaction or hydrofracture grouting) with cement is what I would have done since I'm a grouting engineer but honestly it would've been similar in cost and schedule to what they did.
I've lifted a penstock at a power generating station using cement and sodium silicate. 3 months to lift 3/4" with a goal of 1". With steady gradual progress, its possible to react to geoinstrument feedback to target specific points to lift and others to leave alone. The structures took weeks to react to the initial consolidation and kept moving upward for weeks after I completed the work to reach the 1" total lift target.
Compensation grouting with water reactive polyurethane is hard to control because polyurethane expands so much and doesn't necessarily find water to react with at the time of injection, especially in clay. The soil and foundation may take weeks to react to injection (as measured on geoinstruments), so the rate and location of lifting is unpredictable, and differential and overrcompensation happens. People do compensation with polyurethane successfully, but it carries risk.
I heard they did pump grout into the ground to harden it up and stabilize it. Whatever they did it worked.
I had thought that they actually did try that as a temporary measure, but it was a long time ago.
I was thinking that they should just mud jack it. I suspect my home brew sidewalk repair experiance is not adequate for this scale of project. @@davidschoon8254
The freezing concept was used in Amsterdam during the construction of the Noord-Zuid Lijn (North-South Line). It runs underneath the historic city center and everything is built on wooden poles as it was originally a marsh. Some huge, historic buildings risked collapse, so they froze a massive section to drill through safely.
I was there in 1987, 3 years before the tower was closed for repairs. It is a terribly disorienting building to climb the stairs to the top, not only because of the lean that causes you to (correctly) feel like you are leaning in every direction in sequence, like someone terribly drunk, but also because the centuries of foot traffic on the steps have caused them to wear out unevenly, so they are dished out where the feet have trafficked the most. Plus the single narrow spiral stair has both people climbing up and people climbing down at the same time. It was also ver scary when you got to the top, because from the lowest side of the platform, you could not see the base of the tower beneath you, the lean was so great. But I'm glad I had the opportunity and really glad it did not collapse while I was in the tower. I'm so happy it has been stabilized now and future generations will have a chance to experience it themselves.
There's just something extremely joyful about a guy being able to say "recreational geology" with a straight face and a genuine smile
I remember when they were doing this.. we watched an hour (whole first period) of Channel One news once a week in school during home period(the first class)..
Other days we had to watch 15 minutes of it, instead of whatever class we were in.
Everyone liked it because it was far more fun to watch TV than be bored being re-taught things we've learned before.
Channel One news covered plenty of interesting things..
But they also only covered anything political from 1 side of the spectrum.. which is pretty underhanded.
I'm sure it's great to feed propaganda to kids when it's from the side you agree with..
But how would you feel if it was coming from the side you didn't agree with, and all adolescents were being forced to watch it in school?
That's a very dangerous precedent to set. Feeding 12-17 year-olds very select news in a VERY politically biased way.
Being presented by "cool kids" who are 18-21 and meant to be interpreted as role models.
Talk about having no shame.
As a geologist, I laughed so hard....
Sounds like he has rocks in his head.
@@Naruto5471 you wanna look at my obsidian knife?
I thought the same thing when I heard the phrase "stellar seismology" on PBS Space Time earlier this week.
I love the nod to Mitch Hedberg at the beginning. "A river used to run into the Ligurian Sea, It still does...but it did back then too"
Best. 😂👌🏻
He died right across the street from where I lived at the time.
Well, rt. 10 isn’t really a street, per se, but this is true.
Came here for this comment. Lol
“If you’re into recreational geology & heavy construction!” 😂 I really wasn’t until I started watching your channel! Now I think about it driving down the road looking at anything that was built.
Nah, you were the whole time, just didn't know it yet :)
This was my exact thought. I wasn't until you did this to me.
Me too!
Same
It’s legal in Canada now!
5:23 - 5:48 Sneaky, sneaky Grady!!! The Tower was increasinig in it's tilt that entire 25 seconds and I only noticed the difference when I did a quick rewind of the 20 seconds prior to 5:48 to show the stark difference once the catino was removed. Very subtle and VERY well done in your graphics - bravo!! And overall, this video was beautiful and a wonderful illustration of the tremendous, positive real world impact engineer's have on the world!!
Grady, your channel is my favorite example of why UA-cam channels are so much better than regular TV.
So many old cable shows would breeze over topics and say "amazing, right?"
Those shows were dumbed down and insulting; while your videos are deeply interesting and, by inspiring young people to pursue an engineering career, literally making the world a better place. Thank You!
Lots of this stuff you won't even get in university.
your niche audience on YT can come and go as they please. TV is made for the masses and thus has it's flaws associated with its reach.
If the TV (edu content) was indeed insulting, you wouldn't have Grady who was probably "to pursue an engineering career" from watching TV
"So many old cable shows would breeze over topics and say "amazing, right?" Yes, but you have to remember a lot of those older shows were for children, so some simplification was needed. I agree overall that the quality here can get much better than some of those old shows though
And the most annoying thing I noticed lately is that they stretch a 15 minute topic to 1 hour (plus commercials).
TV shows would have "experts" saying how incredible those "ancien builders" were as leaning a single degree more would have brought the tower down, then they would have make 30 more minutes saying that "we had to use computer simulation to get to that level of precision" with at least 3 people saying the same thing including an civil engineer that either isn't worth is salt or with directed questions and editing would have said that "such precision is barely attainable with the most modern techniques".
I saw the bracing of the tower when visiting Italy in the late 90s, however, I didn't get to see the actual fix being done at ground level since the work area was boarded all around. The cables clearly looked temporary, as they were not fixed permanently to the tower rather they embraced the exterior with wood planks to shield the stone from the cable. For everything I saw above the edge of the fence, I guessed they were pumping some sort of cement mix under it, not taking out soil. They did a nice trick there. Thanks for telling the story.
I was there in ‘99 and I remember this too! I was a Kid, but I still have those corny photos that my dad had me pose for, standing in the foreground with one arm up, as if I’m holding up the tower. 😅
Ditto, I was there in 2000 with my wife, and confirm the upper was strapped and tied back with cables. Great to see more info to add to the placarded info provided at site by the engineers (in English!).
I would do jet grouting method. This is soil liquifaction.
It's absolutely wonderful that the engineers locked the leaning side into the sidewalk to support it. Medieval architects were something else.
Knew it was an issue and making the footing on that side wider eases the issue
Too bad they operated a bit too much like modern engineers. Implemented a field fix and then didn't bother to document it in the as-builts, lol.
Hey, even if it's leaning it's lasted 600 years
That has to count for something
@@nasonguy You mean "resident construction engineers?" As-builts are the responsibility of the resident engineers, at least for transportation projects. Design engineers (such as myself) are required to issue "Use-on-Construction" revisions.
Not very smart to start digging on that side though, clearly weakens the wrong side. Had they done it on the "high side" of the tower foundation it would have straightened instead of risking to tilt even more and risk collapse.
Fun fact: The engineers from Imperial College London that assisted this project had already stabilised the Queens Tower at their university in London, and later stabilised Big Ben with the same methods.
I find it very amusing that the sidewalks are actually load bearing, not just for pedestrians but the entire tower.
It's kind of brilliant. They built what amounts to a float foundation/spread footing that is likely the main reason the tower stayed up as long as it has while tilted.
amerifats are getting heavier
@@eternaldrunkoh no not the "amerifats"! Whatever shall we do!
Uh. That's not what he said nor described.
@@eternaldrunk "You're not going up there. It's all winding stairs."
The ending monologue about the team working to continue an 800 year old project was oddly touching. Kudos!
The tower is *curved*?! That is amazing. I can't believe I never knew that.
The walls of old brick buildings are always curved. You just can't see it from the ground. But when you get on top of one and look down the wall you can see it then. You can see every brick. Makes it look taller. Modern brick faced buildings are different. The brick is just a siding. It's held up by the inner structure of the building which is blocks and steel. There's wavy metal straps called ties that hold the brick to the real wall.
I have seen the tower in person. It is not curved. It was built straight, but as it started to tilt, they readjusted the next section so it would be straight up, with a tilted base. They made three corrections to correct for the tilt.
@@robertheinkel6225It is “essentially curved”, no not a true curve, but similar.
Ditto!
@@robertheinkel6225 if not curved, explain how one side has 2 stairs more than the other😮
I saw the title and thought, “What? Again?” I’m glad I didn’t miss anything as big as a second stabilization, and I’m happy to finally hear the story of how it was done.
I'm reminded of the stories a friend of mine tells. he worked construction on housing developments in Florida, and in many places, the slab foundations for houses floated on wet sand until the house was built and slowly compacted the water out. if the house was built asymmetrically, the foundation would tilt under the unbalanced load, so they had to be careful how they loaded the material onto the slab.
that is one nice thing of living in a northern climate- Michigan requires 42" of footings so that solves a lot of floating issues. not all mind you, but a lot
@@pizzaivlife here, the terrain is so varied that there is no one size fits all rule. my brother's beach house is on bedrock. there are other houses I know of, where they drove 30 foot pilings flush to the ground and poured footings on top of them.
@@pizzaivlife where grew up in Florida, ground water aquifer started at around six feet deep. You couldn’t put footings down that deep if you wanted to.
@@kenbrown2808 right, we have those issues too. It is just nice that even in good soil you have to have those 42" of footing. you can need more for structural reasons of course, but that is the starting point for anything you don't want to pop out of the ground
@@sandy1653 we can hit ground water in just inches. I've seen a below ground garage with tides.
Awesome story, great use of diagrams and models to visually show what you are explaining.
Thanks for making and sharing this video.
I just visited the leaning tower of Pisa a month ago on my honeymoon and it’s amazing thing to see in person. I learned all about its lean and foundation changes. So awesome you made a video on it! I loved it
Congratulations on your marriage! May you be a happy couple and pillars of your community!
Another video like this you could do on a many-centuries-long engineering project, albeit one that ended in failure, could be the Aztec capital/Mexico City's water and soil issues: Tenochtitlan was a giant city with Venice-like canals built on both a natural island and expanded with a grid of artificial islands over time, with a complex series of levees, aqueducts, and other systems to intake fresh water and to avoid flooding. When the city was sieged by Conquistadors and armies from other local city-states, much of that infrastructure was destroyed and Mexico City, built on the ruins, had regular issues with flooding. Eventually in the 1700s intensive draining efforts to drain the series of 5 lakes in the valley got underway (after previous management attempts) and continued to the 20th century, which backfired as it ended up almost entirely depleting the aquafer and led to the liquefaction and compaction of the loose lakebed sediment, especially as Mexico City's urban sprawl has spread over much of the former lakebed and added (millions) of tons of weight.
As a result, today, Mexico City is sinking... rapidly. Some parts of the city as fast as 50 centimeters/20 inches a year, and it's not predicted to stop for many decades, and recent reports have found that it's past the point of no return already. There's constant issues with sewage lines, subways, etc breaking as a result of this, and it's renewing flooding issues while the lakes are mostly gone (save some surviving Aztec period canal systems in Xochimilco, which too are threatened by this), now it's worsening issues with retaining rainwater.
Some other channels have covered this already, but I find many of the videos don't delve into the specific engineering details or all the historical context: We know the specifics of how many of the Aztec aqueducts worked (the main aqueduct which sourced water from Chapultepec for example had dual ceramic pipes with a switching mechanism) and with the specific drainage projects, yet neither has really been covered with detailed diagrams and like yet like you did here. I also find people only mention Tenochtitlan, sometimes even mistakenly showing the valley being empty aside from Teno. with it only urbanizing as Mexico City grew, despite there being hundreds of other Aztec cities in the Valley some of which had their own lake infrastructure/engineering efforts (like Texcoco's Texcotzingo waterworks system) some of which played a role in these events; and there being significant urbanization there for thousands of years before the Aztec period, like with Tlatilco, Cuicuilco, Teotihuacan, etc.
So I think there's still room for you or the Wendover team you mentioned you work with to contribute to the topic in a way other people haven't done so yet. I actually work with history and archeology channels with researching and fact checking their Mesoamerican stuff and would be down to help out if you ever wanted to cover it!
Very interesting. I only knew the outline of this. This topic is a must for this channel. Although I think it will take more than one video!
That sounds fascinating!
How do the massive sinkholes which open from time to time come about?
This!
An entire channel dedicated to infrastructure history and archaeology would be fascinating.
I've had many teachers throughout my life. This channel continues to be on the top ten list of most influential.
Back in the early 80s I lived in Egypt and met some Italian engineers that lived in the same hotel that I was staying. I told them what I would do to fix the tower and this is exactly what I told them to do. Two years ago the History channel showed what they did. That really made my day.
At the moment in Italy we're having a very similar situation in Bologna, where one of the two towers is leaning so much they had to close part of the town center. From what I understood, the real issue is that in this case the motivation for such lean are unclear, hence there's no idea of how to act.
as far as i know bologna's ground is really muddy, and can't withstand the weight (that's why Bologna can't have a metro).... add up the traffic just driving by... stay strong Garisenda!
If it's the tower I'm thinking of, then the correct first step is probably to disassemble the tower so a new foundation can be built. Less intrusive measures may be possible, but from what I've heard the towers in the area in general were probably never on foundations fit for their size, so if the thing is to really last it needs a good foundation to be engineered, preferably with the neighboring tower getting the same treatment as soon as the first one is finished up.
The tower in Bologna also leans a lot, it’s just as noticeable as the one in Pisa. It’s just not as famous because it’s not as pretty.
@@Sashazur Yeah, it's definitely ugly.
Get Lewis Ferguson to stand up against it
Who knew the Leaning Tower of Pisa had such a cool backstory.
2:05 *by neighbouring cities. Tuscany has a long history of city rivalries. The main ones are Pisa vs Livorno, Siena vs Firenze... But in general each city hates each other, even the smaller ones.
...was in Larderello (Tuscany) two days ago👌. The people can 'rival' one another but not the food/drinks, natural landscapes, cultures. 💯
Ah also the whole region specifically hate one of its cities: Pisa itself so the tower is the symbol of their evil nature, the PISANS.
@@Boretheory it's summed up in one sentence: "pisa merda"
@@gab_v250 sempre 🥹 ( always )
I watched a documentary on the Tower and in it they said there's wedges in the base and by measuring those wedges they were able to track the lean over time. They even plotted the data on a computer and showed how the tower's been moving over time. It was hilarious. It's been doing a dance back and forth.
When in the Chicago area, I always love to visit the Leaning Tower of Niles. It opened in 1934 and it is a half size replica of the one in Pisa.
Somewhere out in the desert we have the real London Bridge too. Some screwball bought it and shipped it over block by block. They spray painted numbers on every block so they could put it back together just the way it was. I think it's in front of some housing development? They built an artificial waterway under it so it's not just sitting in the desert. But it's really sitting in the desert now. It is rather charming. I've seen pictures of it. How many bridges get to retire and enjoy their autumn years?
@@1pcfred Yep, if I remember correctly, it's somewhere in Arizona?
Americans only know how to copy
@@davideastham that sounds right. It's in either Arizona or Nevada. One of those Godforsaken desert states. I think they got the bridge just as an attraction. Like look it's something other than barren desert. We have a famous bridge. The Brits were going to demolish it anyways. They needed a bigger bridge. So they happily sold it to the loon.
I don't often comment but I feel like I have to: Practical Engineering is one of, if not the best, shows I've ever watched. The content turns what might at first appear as mundane and everyday things that everyone knows about or have some reference to (e.g. highway construction for example) into genuinely interesting and fascinating pieces with excellent infographics and the topics are explained in a way that I feel appeals to both laymen and engineers alike. All while being narrated by that very soothing voice. Please keep it up ❤
For anyone wondering what an arcsecond is: It's 1/60th of an arcminute, which is 1/60th of a degree.
This wins the coveted Comment of the Day award.
i remember all the work that went into saving the tower, it was definitely a great engineering feat to save the tower. There is definitely a lot more monitoring in place and there are limits on how many people can be in the tower too. Thanks for doing a story on this
I just finished a geotechnical engineering class that had a section on consolidation. One of the really interesting things we learned about electro-osmotic consolidation is that it is triangular so the soil between the electrodes is not consolidated equally. Another really interesting thing is that electro-osmotic consolidation not only consolidates the soil but also increases the strength of the soil due to particles from the electrodes being left behind during the process. I think that it is a fascinating process that deserves its own video.
Surely this is only a temporary condition? Any zones of negative porewater pressure between electrodes should start the consolidation process in the surrounding soils due to the pressure gradient.
Interesting
@@craigmcdougall3693 I just checked my notes again and I want to be clear I am not an expert in any of this but this is what I could find. The reason for the ununiform consolidation is that the voltage is highest at the anode which causes the water to flow towards the cathode. This results in the highest degree of consolidation occurring at the anode while the lowest consolidation occurs at the cathode as the water that flows out is immediately replaced. Once the power is turned off the pressure gradient dissipates but the ununiform consolidation remains. As for the permanent change in soil properties, studies showed that the Atterberg limits of the soil also changed in a triangular distribution with the highest increase occurring at the anode. The cause for this is that as the anode corrodes its ions flow into the soil in the direction of the water flow and react causing a change in soil properties.
One of my favourite Practical Engineering videos for a while. Absolutely fascinating & total genius, really.
This was an amazing video. I knew they had 'fixed' the tower but never the details. the graphics were very helpful in understanding the process.
btw if you talk to the Nebula people, I would love a windows app. I have a subscription but never remember to use it.
I’ve learned more about the history of the Tower in the first 5 minutes than any other time in my life. It was always just there, and I would think about it from time to time when Superman would straighten it and then tilt it back again, angering the local craftsmen who made figurines of it. But now I realize that wouldn’t have been possible, especially since I never knew the tower was built curved. That’s so cool. This was insanely informative, but also incredibly entertaining!
My family loves your content!!!
Just imagine being having worked on this in the past and seeing the new and amazing ways that modern architects carried on your work, this is awe-inspiring. I wonder what similar situations we are in that will be corrected like this in the distant future.
What a great video!
The first time I went up the leaning tower was when I was 10 years old in 1970.
Now, for my retirement, I am planning to stay half of the year in Pisa. That's a long lovestory.
Thank you for enlightening me on my old love's health...!
My geotechnical design professor at UNH in the mid-1990s, Dr. Jean Benoit, was one of the engineers/researchers working on the stabilization project. For a work study, I helped on a few of his presentations he was giving in Italy. Nice to see it actually worked.
The Company which did this is from the Ruhr Valley. I love how the Know-How from Decades of Mining can still be very usefull in some cases, although everything Mining related has already shut down in Germany. It shows how a transition for a industry reliant Region to a Tech Region is possible. I am proud to be a part of this process :)
As an Italian who lives not so far from the tower (160km or 100mi), I've found this video amazing, I was a kid when this was done so I was not aware of how bad the things were at that time
I always love a good Mitch Hedberg reference. Nice!
Thank you so much for providing this high-quality video for free. I'm a Korean interested in engineering. Recently, I've been watching many English videos without subtitles to improve my English skills. Your kind narrator is very helpful to me as an English beginner.🥰
The Garisenda tower in Bologna has a similar problem.
The degrees of tilt are even greater, and very recently it has been deemed dangerous after some instruments detected too much vibration
Yep, the city has closed near road access to try to minimize vibrations
The problem is that they can't pull this trick with the Garisenda. I suspect the soil situation is similar, but the tower is embedded in a very narrow urban setting.
Another amazing video Grady! Thanks for being awesome! ❤
Dr. Ratio can gives us more knowledge about this tower than anyone.
"If you're in to recreational geology and heavy construction. And who isn't?" Grady is a gift to humanity.
8:04 Like Lacroscopoc/Robotic Surgery…but for Foundations. Absolutely AMAZING.
Somewhat similar was done to one bridge pier in Bratislava recently. It was sinking and leaning into the Danube. The bridge was being rebuilt, so they decided to inject concrete under high pressure under the pier as well as inside it to fill all cracks. Eventually the bridge pier from the year 1890 rose and tilted several centimeters, but I do not remember the numbers. It was also reinforced and extended, as two adjacent piers to one side were replaced by a single one to make the passage wider and the bridge is a bit higher above the water. Thus existing pier had to carry a higher load of the longer bridge "field" between the piers and shipping is now easier even during times with higher water levels of the Danube river. I thought they injected some concrete under pressure below the sinking side of the Tower of Pisa, but they did the opposite - they made the other side sink to compensate for the tilt. Until watching this video, I was completely ignorant, I just remember reading that the tower was somewhat "straightened" in the 1990s using modern technology.
I lived in Pisa when the consolidation project started, I could see the leaning tower from the window of my room. The building where I lived was noticeabily tilting, a marble or a ball on the floor would immediately started to roll and also any water spill on the floor would drift toward the wall. The sidewalk at the side of the building had detached from the wall. This would have been very concerning on a different city, but here it was accounted for while planning the building and no consolidation was required at that point in time. The soil in Pisa lacks stiffness to support tall buildings correctly and driving piles to the bedrock would be excessively expensive - and far beyond the capabilities of the ancient builders. In Pisa there are two further smaller leaning towers, San Michele degli Scalzi and San Nicola. The former is leaning more than the famous tower. The ancient builders found a way to keep it standing (internal arches, I'm told) despite the quite obvious foundation fault.
As a budding young geologist at the time, I found this project fascinating
Thank you sir. I'm very aware of the time and efforts it takes first to be in a position to know enough so that you can even speak on this topic, but also then to professionally create and present such a well made video. I do regret Alan Alda popularizing the narrative technique of instilling a childlike wonder and portent into every word of every turn of every phrase. A large segment of your audience can't do without it, and you have rightly implemented it in gauging your listeners. Oh boy gee whiz(!), don't get me wrong; everyone with an interest in the Tower either learned something new, or solidified their previous understanding - including me with my supercilious attitude.
I live near a monastic roundtower called Kilmacduagh (west Ireland). It's been leaning for roughly 1000 years.
👏this 👏is 👏the content i wished i'd had on my TV growing up: especially as i got into my teens. these graphics and the writing are such a fantastic, accessible way to draw in a broad audience. i'm sad i didn't discover this channel earlier, but it took very little convincing to make me a huge fan, and i will be sharing this with some of my friends and peers in education (and teachers can use all the help they can get).
What I find absolutely stunning is that the tower could take so much leaning and didn't collapse
It was built over a 200 year span which gave the foundation time to settle.
This is one of my favorite channels. My kids enjoy whenever I share these with them
Doesn't matter what profession u come from, you have to tip your hat off to engineers. These guys are insane.
I'm glad they were able to prevent the tower from collapsing! This is truly a triumph of modern engineering! Bravo!
The tallest leaning tower in the world is still the Olympic Stadium in Montreal. It's not fallign over but it's been a white elephant also. The cost of the stadium was exhorbitant and not there's talks to add a roof at a cost of 1 billion dollars! The old roof has been out of service for years after failing. It was a kevlar fabric roof hanging down from this massive leaning tower.
dont talk about that roof. Over her everyone want to tear down the Olympic stadium because of that roof 🤣
@@1nicubePolitics and religion are okay, but don't talk about the roof? 😅
It's the tallest intentionally leaning tower. The Millenium tower is likely the tallest unintentionally leaning tower. It is 32 meters taller.
@@jamesclarkson156The Millenium tower is leaning less and 1/60th of one degree. Pisa is about at 4 degree and olympic stadium at almost 45. Not the same scale
@integza being mentioned in your video must be a life achievement completed ! Love you both !
Now they can start working on the San Francisco Millennium Tower
Crazy as I have worked on small projects. Thinking about a 12 year project from concept to completion is crazy. Good for saving this historic landmark.
Starting with a Mitch Hedberg reference. I see what you did there
I'm old enough to remember when all this was going on, and the huge debate about straightening the tower completely. Thanks for covering this Grady
While the structure is impressive I don't think it'd have garnered nearly the attention it has if it wasn't leaning. The lean is the main attraction with it. Straighten it out and it's just another antique building. So I can't agree with anyone that was advocating for completely straightening it. Although I might have straightened it up a bit more than they did. It's still really leaning. But I guess that's how they like it.
As Grady pointed out, it's not just leaning but also curved. They couldn't make it perfectly straight even if they wanted to. If the base was level, then it would be curved to the north, because the upper levels were built to compensate for the lean to the south.
@@jdlessl nothing is impossible. They could fix that too if they really wanted to. It isn't practical but that doesn't mean it can't be done. They could tear the whole tower down and completely rebuild it if they really wanted to. Make it straight as an arrow and you'd never know looking at it that it was done. They rebuilt Stonehenge in 1958 with heavy equipment and nobody today knows. The megalith you're familiar with didn't exist before then. People think cavemen built it. Maybe once they did, but not the site today. They put it together how they think it may have been. But it was really just a pile of rocks when they started. Some work had been done previously in 1908 I think too? But they really tore it apart and redid it in the 50s. Anything for the tourists.
This is so fascinating and cool! I didn't even realize the builders were compensating for the lean originally until you just mentioned it. What weird (and neat) facts and info on what they did to save it, how much it was tilting, and so on!
This is fascinating! I've only gotten in as far as the stages of initial construction and I'm hooked. The details on the corrections were never very well publicized.
Watched it and it didn't disappoint. This was one of the most interesting projects I had never really heard details about. I've found a new YT rabbit hole to explore :)
"It still does, but it did back then, too!"
Never thought I'd hear Practical Engineering pull out the Mitch Hedburg joke! Made my day.
I’m sure the folks at Millennium Tower will be thrilled to learn that the leaning adds character and charm to the building.
Are you really admitting on an open forum that you don't grasp something as obvious as the fact that the Tower of Pisa has no residents, and serves no purpose other than a historical monument and tourist attraction? OR are you admitting that you're not intelligent enough to understand why that makes it different that the Millenium tower?
@@andrewalexander9492 Are *you* really admitting on an open form that you don't grasp simple sarcastic humor??
@@Self_Evident Nope, I grasp sarcasm just fine. But in order for your comment to actually BE sarcasm, there has to be equivalency between the Millennium tower and the tower of Pisa. Which of course, there is none. Without that, your comment isn't sarcasm, just inane nonsense.
@@andrewalexander9492 wow. the OP was making what is commonly known as "a joke". As you are plainly unfamiliar with the concept, I will say this: "jokes" are not required to be *literally* apt. For example, the fact that the LTP and the MT are centuries different in age, one is residential and the other not, is not inconsistent with the OP's comment being a "joke". Rather, the 'equivalency' is that they are both towers with an unintended lean, and both of which have been or are in the process of being unleant. I hope this helps, but as I will lay money you are an engineer, perhaps not.
😆
I recently learned about the towers of Bologna, Italy, and in particular Garisenda Tower of the "Two Towers", which also has an extreme lean and was closed earlier this month (December 2023) for fears of a collapse. Fascinating stuff!
nice Mitch Hedberg referrence😂
Nice Mitch Hedberg reference. (The river used to spill out..., it still does but it used to, too)
0:11 Mitch Hedberg reference?
Hey, Grady. . . I’m finally getting around to reading your “Engineering in Plain Sight”. Awesome book. Highy recommended for curious people of ALL ages!
i literally gasped when you said that it had a safety factor of *1.07*
When I design machines that carry people, it requires a safety factor of 5 or 6 to be CE-compliant. I don't know how it is for structures, but 1.07 is _definitely_ not enough to be safe.
Awesome video!!! Didn't know this tower rescue was so complex!
I've been up the tower three months ago. It's still really far leaning.
I usually have no problems with climbing towers at all, but with the observation walkway at top being that far angled, it even made me pretty queasy.
Thanks!
Pls add language audio track like bangla, hindi etc
As a young geotechnical engineer, this detailed and creative thinking is just inspiring. Thank you for the great explanation Grady.
I'm from Pisa, fun fact, the entire height of the tower is under the sea level
It’s really quite the site in person! I visited in 1995, it had weights on the base with steel cables wrapped & pulling. Included a 45 minute trip by train to Florence. So glad they were successful restoring a safer lean to the tower!
As I recall, in 1983, Superman, after being exposed to Kryptonite that affected his personality, straightened the Leaning Tower of Pisa. But he did restore the tilt later that year after recovering from the Kryptonite effects. What effect did that have on the engineering plan to preserve the tower?
I remember news reports in the early 90s about closure of the tower and the addition of lead ingots. Great to know the rest of the story!
I don't like the fact that they went through all this trouble and still didn't fix the original problem. To this day it's still leaning and flawed. I mean if I just want to see a building leaning from poor workmanship I can just go to Chicago. The tower would be a lot more majestic if it was truly perfectly plumb.
I don't agree,it's the whole point of the leaning tower.Its curved!
Curved? I didn't know that
Fun fact, at the moment here in Italy we are going through another situation like the one of the leaning tower of Pisa. Look up "Torre della Garisenda" in Bologna
Dr. Ratio be like:
Awesome! As a military brat in the early 90’s, got to visit. Great memory and yep, it was closed. I took a pic of the tower and made a painting from it, still have that painting, good memories.
Dr ratio reference😫🫣😱
"Tell me what you think".... I think you produced a really really fun and informative video. Well Done! Keep up the good work and I will be subscribing to Nebula... right now!
actually they didnt straighten it.. they just stopped it from leaning further
You should collab with SmarterEveryDay
A video where I knew the ending before I even watched it! Way back in 2000, I was stationed at Camp Darby, Italy when I was in the USAF. Pisa was about 5 miles or so away. When I was there, they had the counterweights and unsightly cables attached to it; people were not allowed inside. It was a few years after I left that I learned about the augers that evacuated soil under it so that it leaned back the right way. They probably could have made it perfectly vertical using that method, but that wouldn't be any fun to have the Leaning Tower of Pisa no longer leaning....
Near where I live, there’s a medieval campanile going through a similar situation, we’ve seen lead weights used, but the authorities still haven’t proclaimed whether the operation went as expected. Let’s just say that I the last three or so months the tilt increased visibly, in THREE MONTHS
Unexpected Mitch Hedberg in the first fifteen seconds. Thanks for that!
Thank you Grady, I had no idea that the tower was built with a curve to counter its existing lean.
Remember when the Discovery channel made excellent documentaries? I do, and they made an episode on The Leaning Tower if Pisa. When they left it, it was just after the lead blocks went into place. I hadn't read or seen much of it since. It's nice to know that it's safe again.
Smart & authentic integration of the sponsorship in the end. Chapeau bas!
Your shows are always amazing!
I love this video as well as the others! I just received an early Christmas gift being a signed copy of engineering in plain sight from you. Despite any other gift I may revive that book is easily my favorite. You’re a true inspiration and mentor to me to be the best I can be in whatever I undertake. Keep up the great work.! Thankyou for such an amazing source of inspiration encouragement and knowledge.! 🙃🙃
Hey, Grady!
Just wanted to say that I really like your channel. Whenever I start watching one of your videos I find a smile on my face and that I'm learning and enjoying myself. You're obviously doing something right!
Merry Christmas from a Norwegian woodworker :-)
This is the first time ive heard anyone talk about how the shows that come on tv are just reality garbage. I loved How It's Made, Modern Marvels and other such shows that actually had educational value. I appreciate you giving a shout out to other channels some I knew like Integza and others I didn't and will be subscribing to now.
This man is one of the coolest nerds on youtube, you're killin it man. Keep the quality content ❤❤
I was there in 1999 when they were doing this... (My dad is an Italian immigrant to Canada so we visit every so often). It's neat to see what they were doing in your video. Thanks!
I remember when I was in grade school back in the 60's, this topic was in a small magazine/booklet that we used to get. I believe it was called "The Weekly Reader", and it had items of news from around the world (Expo 67' seems to be a fond memory from those days). We read that scientists were trying to figure out how to stabilize the tower and freezing the ground was apparently one of the ideas brought fourth. It's odd that it took thirty years for them to finally do something.
That opening line was pure Mitch Hedberg goodness. Well played, Grady!