Dream Theater - Octavarium (432 Hz)

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 10 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 63

  • @rennanmarcusmusic
    @rennanmarcusmusic 3 роки тому +5

    Don't know much about that 432hz thing, but the songs get far more comfortable to hear.

    • @FranciscoBautista196
      @FranciscoBautista196 2 роки тому +1

      I cannot hear any difference than the original

    • @rennanmarcusmusic
      @rennanmarcusmusic 2 роки тому +1

      @@FranciscoBautista196 You see better when you compare both versions. It's like the original 440hz were out of tune or something.

  • @jbarros57
    @jbarros57 5 років тому +8

    one of the best DT songs , real progressive rock

    • @mohannadnassar7310
      @mohannadnassar7310 5 років тому +2

      progressive metal *

    • @jbarros57
      @jbarros57 5 років тому

      @@mohannadnassar7310 it is true, but in this song the structure and the keyboards sounds like something closely related with the 70´s . Thank you for sharing your thoughts

  • @lutecludwig8863
    @lutecludwig8863 5 років тому +62

    AHH 432Hz camp. The flat earthers of music

    • @phil151987
      @phil151987 5 років тому +10

      HAHAHAHAHAHAHHAA...you´ve made my day !! thx

    • @enki2958
      @enki2958 5 років тому +3

      @ Lutec Ludwig: Ahh, those who think that argumentum ad verecundiam equals truth.

    • @pabloolofssoncastaneda9889
      @pabloolofssoncastaneda9889 3 роки тому +1

      432Hz has nothing to do with Flat Earth lol

    • @rgamer4272
      @rgamer4272 3 роки тому +1

      @@pabloolofssoncastaneda9889 They're saying that the stuff that is said about 432 Hz is just as ridiculous as Flat Earth, not that it has anything to do with it.
      I believe that 432 Hz is good for meditation. People should at least give it a try before coming to a conclusion about how the frequency affects people.

    • @toddmichaels42
      @toddmichaels42 Рік тому

      I don't need to believe in Flat Earth to know NASA lies... They told me all by themselves.
      And Cymatics is observable, repeatable and quantify-able... sounds like science to me.

  • @kozuke1742
    @kozuke1742 4 роки тому +4

    17:47 Christmas vibes here

  • @javiersocarras3489
    @javiersocarras3489 5 років тому +3

    This is the original track from the Octavarium album. Love It!!!

    • @TwoCablesOCN
      @TwoCablesOCN 5 років тому

      Actually, it's not! I didn't notice this until now, but the album version doesn't have the flute outtro at the end.

  • @aedeceaecde5873
    @aedeceaecde5873 8 років тому +5

    astonishing New album please!!!!!!!

  • @felipevillalobosparraguirr5546
    @felipevillalobosparraguirr5546 8 років тому +5

    not sure if my hear is quite right but I feel it like the original tune

    • @AnnaIrisGiannaka
      @AnnaIrisGiannaka  8 років тому +4

      it's not! you must have a good ear to hear the difference though. not everyone can hear it. try opening another window with the original and listen to it right after the converted version. maybe in this way you will be able to tell the difference.

    • @alessandroformica6824
      @alessandroformica6824 5 років тому +1

      @@AnnaIrisGiannaka This version seems to be slighlty slower than the original. Same for The count of Tuscany that I just listened to

    • @viruscure4677
      @viruscure4677 3 роки тому

      Sounds of a much lower tone.....

    • @viruscure4677
      @viruscure4677 3 роки тому +1

      There is a difference I even have the flac version of this..... honestly this version is less appealing to me....

    • @Manerick
      @Manerick 3 роки тому

      is 5% lower in tone

  • @antonispapageorge5717
    @antonispapageorge5717 Рік тому

    Fibonacci!

  • @anindhiakesya3084
    @anindhiakesya3084 5 років тому +2

    Panggung mimpi
    Mike best forever

  • @MichaelReyk
    @MichaelReyk 6 років тому +1

    HELLO! i have a question! how do you converted this audio file into 432 hz?? i need to know! thanks!

    • @AnnaIrisGiannaka
      @AnnaIrisGiannaka  6 років тому

      I did it with Audacity. (It's a free audio editing software in case you've never heard of it.)

    • @enki2958
      @enki2958 5 років тому +3

      @ Mike Rey 1. Open Audacity 2. Load the song you wish to convert 3. Open the effects drop down menu. In it you find "pitch/tune floating change" (under speed change). Enter for both sides 1,181 (left and right) and confirm it. After that it will be converted to 432 Hz.

  • @viruscure4677
    @viruscure4677 3 роки тому

    Yeah no this version sounds weird to me I can definitely hear the difference

  • @pungkybangdjo329
    @pungkybangdjo329 5 років тому

    Edan gitarnyaaaa 🤘🤘

  • @timchaoskiller
    @timchaoskiller 5 років тому +2

    so what's the difference?

    • @valezz8465
      @valezz8465 5 років тому +2

      @@lbp_chessguy5640 it's not. Every instrument is tuned with the A at 440hz, this one has the A at 432hz...so just a little bit lower than the standard songs, so it's not out of tune.

    • @lbp_chessguy5640
      @lbp_chessguy5640 5 років тому

      @@valezz8465 I was joking. 😑

    • @valezz8465
      @valezz8465 5 років тому

      @@lbp_chessguy5640 well that's technically incorrect

    • @memanuel_
      @memanuel_ 5 років тому

      @@lbp_chessguy5640 Being in tune means that every note sounds in a specific way depending of the base note, that in this case is the A tuned at 432hz. Out of tune would be that (for example) the first 6 notes were tuned to A 432 and the other 6 were at A 440

    • @memanuel_
      @memanuel_ 5 років тому +3

      it's all a myth, you were lied... The only difference is that this version sounds just a bit lower than the original

  • @ChristianMartins
    @ChristianMartins 5 років тому +2

    Can someone explain to me why 432 hz is better than the original? I can hear the difference, but I enjoy this as much as the original

    • @fernievanrodrius6078
      @fernievanrodrius6078 5 років тому +5

      There's no such a big difference. In any cause the universe does NOT vibrate at 432 Hz or something, for sure

    • @ChristianMartins
      @ChristianMartins 5 років тому

      @@fernievanrodrius6078 OK, but why are there so many people saying this is way better than the original?

    • @fernievanrodrius6078
      @fernievanrodrius6078 5 років тому +7

      @@ChristianMartins Probably because they want to believe in a fantasy-stories.

    • @ChristianMartins
      @ChristianMartins 5 років тому +1

      @@fernievanrodrius6078 OK, I got it. Google told me it is some crap about the "frequency of the universe".

    • @kindtchiva
      @kindtchiva 5 років тому +2

      Tuning A to 432 hz instead of 440 hz changes the feeling of the song. Some artists have songs tuned to a lot of other frequencies. It is also believed that tuning a song to 432 hz is "better" for your body (I don't think so). However, this song was not recorded in 432 hz, the uploader used a program to "fake" detune the song. If you want to know more about 432 hz, I would recommend you watch Adam Neely video called "A = 432Hz".

  • @indiegoo
    @indiegoo 8 років тому +13

    Way much better this way
    Don't understand why they didn't recorded it this way!

  • @theanalogkid2778
    @theanalogkid2778 4 роки тому

    Soooo it's slightly flat in tuning? I don't understand the hype about this

    • @rgamer4272
      @rgamer4272 3 роки тому

      It helps when you're meditating at the very least, I believe.

  • @FranciscoBautista196
    @FranciscoBautista196 2 роки тому

    432 hz does not make any sense. Obviosly It Is not sampling rate so It sounds like conspiracy theory jeje