These tests are insufficient. For example, when you compare the vacuums, how easy were they to maintain and clean? What's the battery life? All you did was basic suction.
The Temu vacuum may have picked up the debris well enough, but it also dispersed the finer particulate into the air and thus into your lungs and on top of surfaces in the form of dust because it does not include a true HEPA filter like the more expensive brand. So basically if you have allergies or hate to dust the Temu vacuum is a major fail unlike depicted in this video.
If you're going to pay $600 for a hair styler, at least explain the technology inside the expensive one and why it's better, and why the cheaper one was radiating smells. This is supposed to be tech journalism at the end of the day.
@@ToughLuckStudio What I said would have tacked on perhaps 2 minutes at tops to the video: "The $600 hair dryer features (?) technology, which explains the pricepoint; the (?) technology features (?) which is why it performs better at (?), meanwhile the cheaper one uses a very basic version of (?). The smells radiatiating from the cheaper one is a result of (?) a common problem found in cheaper electronics".
Not that I’m defending the price, but it’s a multi-styler which has a dryer, brush, round brush, curling irons, and smoothers. It is supposed to do all “the things”. That being said I bought the same dupe one and I love mine.
I wish there was a portion in this video about child labor, the Uyghurs and forced labor. You don't get as low as $11 for ear pods without some sketchy stuff
I'm always ultra cautious of Temu. Considering I've gotten stuff off of Ebay back when Ebay was big, that sounds funny to say. But still something about these stores like Temu and AliExpress rubs me the wrong way. I love walking into a small Mom & Pop store to support the local economy. But online, well that's something different.
Lifx is going to take issue with being called a dupe. They may not be as big as the other smart bulb brands but they do intend to be their own thing. 1:16
Sorry but LiFx are not dupes of Philips hue lights; they work in a completely different way as create there own mesh network rather than needing a bridge. This is such a huge miss for a tech page!
I feel like if the temu airpods doubled their price and increased battery size and speaker size it would be close to the Apple airpods at 10 times less expensive.
good topic! but testing has to better, details and fair. data points are not even close for any of the products. e.g the noice level for the last 2 products.
i feel like she is someone u met at a bar talking about stuff rather than someone who studied journalism. Her thoughts are very expressive... but unstructured. It would have been better if she had a script or template to follow.
A “knockoff” isn’t a counterfeit product, it’s a product that copies the original product usually cheaper and not as good but does not use the branding and logos.
That cordless vacuum is nothing like a Dyson. Almost any vacuum can pick up surface level debris. It really does not deep clean, have good filtration, or battery life.
How do fake AirPods work so flawlessly within the Apple ecosystem? Transparency mode, noise cancellation all work through Control Panel…. I just don’t get how it can break apples software
![Lp. Сердце Вселенной #1 НАЧАЛО ПУТЕШЕСТВИЯ [Новый сезон] • Майнкрафт](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/380Q7gLWGvk/mqdefault.jpg)
These tests are insufficient. For example, when you compare the vacuums, how easy were they to maintain and clean? What's the battery life? All you did was basic suction.
That’s all you need …
$11 for some AirPods Pro does not make sense, but in this economy…
The Temu vacuum may have picked up the debris well enough, but it also dispersed the finer particulate into the air and thus into your lungs and on top of surfaces in the form of dust because it does not include a true HEPA filter like the more expensive brand. So basically if you have allergies or hate to dust the Temu vacuum is a major fail unlike depicted in this video.
If you're going to pay $600 for a hair styler, at least explain the technology inside the expensive one and why it's better, and why the cheaper one was radiating smells. This is supposed to be tech journalism at the end of the day.
Go watch a review then.. this video would be 45 minutes if they did breakdowns and reviews on each one
@@ToughLuckStudio What I said would have tacked on perhaps 2 minutes at tops to the video: "The $600 hair dryer features (?) technology, which explains the pricepoint; the (?) technology features (?) which is why it performs better at (?), meanwhile the cheaper one uses a very basic version of (?). The smells radiatiating from the cheaper one is a result of (?) a common problem found in cheaper electronics".
600 for hair dryer?!
those curls are justifying it tho, don't u say!?😂
Dyson is a rip off. Poor quality.
I think she's redirecting the name "Dupe!!!" because yeah, who in their right mind pays $600 for a hair dryer/curler/straightener? 🤣🤣🤣
Not that I’m defending the price, but it’s a multi-styler which has a dryer, brush, round brush, curling irons, and smoothers. It is supposed to do all “the things”. That being said I bought the same dupe one and I love mine.
I know right?? Lol omg
Lifx is a dupe?
Exactly!
Lost all credibility after that lol
I wish there was a portion in this video about child labor, the Uyghurs and forced labor. You don't get as low as $11 for ear pods without some sketchy stuff
As with every product
No safety standards on the temu duplicates.
Nice video 👏🙂
War to knockoffs! We should support legal economy. Flippy’s story is sad.
I’ll never buy from Temu, it’s known as a malicious app 🏴☠️
Down with Temu
I'm always ultra cautious of Temu. Considering I've gotten stuff off of Ebay back when Ebay was big, that sounds funny to say. But still something about these stores like Temu and AliExpress rubs me the wrong way. I love walking into a small Mom & Pop store to support the local economy. But online, well that's something different.
Lifx is going to take issue with being called a dupe. They may not be as big as the other smart bulb brands but they do intend to be their own thing. 1:16
Sorry but LiFx are not dupes of Philips hue lights; they work in a completely different way as create there own mesh network rather than needing a bridge. This is such a huge miss for a tech page!
Yes makes perfect sense. My AirPods are like a part of you. My fiancé earbuds are cheaper but sounds muffled.
$600 is outrageous
i bought a bunch of lightning cable dupes from temu, and they broke a couple of weeks later 😔
Excellent video.
ayyyy teardown guy is back!
Wait, did Jessica sacrifice her own earbuds in the teardown for this video??
Sprinkles? How about you try that on some old carpet with layers of cat and dog hair? I doubt either one could do that worth a damn.
Gotta admit, I'm kinda interested in the Fossett's Flippy soft tablet stand. I have a differently designed one and don't like it as much as I'd hoped.
I feel like if the temu airpods doubled their price and increased battery size and speaker size it would be close to the Apple airpods at 10 times less expensive.
Losing an $11 pair of earbuds is much more manageable than losing a $250 pair of earbuds.
The $250 ones can be tracked/found with the Find My network and pinged when looking for them at your home.
That's insane in itself to pay $600 for a HAIR STYLE PRODUCT!!!!
good topic!
but testing has to better, details and fair. data points are not even close for any of the products. e.g the noice level for the last 2 products.
So basically buy local and never buy overseas products ❤ except stuff already delivered to local
That are many name brand vacuums that have similar performance of a Dyson at a fraction of the cost.
If it’s not a shark, it’s a waste of money, honestly.
That are? It should be there are instead
LIFX is not a dupe. Please correct that
Would’ve like to hear the headphones with the human head microphone
2:35 the camera is too clese a rotating camera shot could have been better
Talking of dupes, Samsung's recent shameful Temu-looking knockoffs of Apple's products should have been on here too 🤭
i feel like she is someone u met at a bar talking about stuff rather than someone who studied journalism. Her thoughts are very expressive... but unstructured. It would have been better if she had a script or template to follow.
I'm quite such this would make your music sound terrible
A “knockoff” isn’t a counterfeit product, it’s a product that copies the original product usually cheaper and not as good but does not use the branding and logos.
CNET employees must make great
$$$….
Good video thanks. Millions of dollars to pursue them? Perhaps shop for new legal representation.
That cordless vacuum is nothing like a Dyson. Almost any vacuum can pick up surface level debris. It really does not deep clean, have good filtration, or battery life.
How do fake AirPods work so flawlessly within the Apple ecosystem? Transparency mode, noise cancellation all work through Control Panel…. I just don’t get how it can break apples software
it's tEHmoo not tEEmoo :)
No, I'm wondering who pays $250 for a pair of earbuds? What kind of nonsense?😮
Apple’s earbuds go on sale all the time. I bought them for $180 in December and they’re on sale for $170 for Prime Day.