Assessing and validating formative indicators in SmartPLS

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 15 жов 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 6

  • @anthonygikuri
    @anthonygikuri Рік тому +2

    Thank you for your nice presentation. Hair et al. 2014 recommends testing convergent validity as the first step.for evaluating the formative, measurement models. I didn't see that aspect in your presentation. Again I the concept of Global Single Item..... Do you have an idea? How do I develop it if I didn't have it in my data set.

    • @rekharisaac
      @rekharisaac Місяць тому

      I am in a similar situation. How did you progress?

  • @nouraahmadi3196
    @nouraahmadi3196 3 місяці тому

    Hello, thank you for the video. i have high negative response (disagreement) to one question of the survey. Which is affecting the outer weight and outer loading of the indictor and the construct. what should i do

  • @rekharisaac
    @rekharisaac Місяць тому

    @The-Dissertation-Thesis-Mentor thank you so much for this video. You don't mention checking the convergent validity of the formative constructs using redundancy analysis (as mentioned in some books and literature). Is that not needed? I am currently assessing a formative-formative HOC model, but I do not have global single items for a few of my formative constructs. Thus, I am unable to check convergent validity via redundancy analysis. Is this a problem? Is there a solution to this or do I just skip testing for convergent validity? Thank you in advance!

  • @mansour6629
    @mansour6629 Рік тому

    Same issue.
    Have you resolved it?

  • @mansour6629
    @mansour6629 Рік тому

    How about convergent validity? Is it a must or recommended step?