Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson 'doesn't understand' constitution she's 'meant to protect'

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 28 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 855

  • @OgreRoku
    @OgreRoku 8 місяців тому +110

    By refusing to answer the question of what is a woman, she showed an ideology that destroys her credibility! Justice token !

    • @THEROOTMATTERS
      @THEROOTMATTERS 8 місяців тому

      JUST WHAT THE DEMs ORDERED, JUSTICES THAT DO NOT CARE TO KNOW TRUTH. SHE IS GETTO!

  • @2partys1tyranny
    @2partys1tyranny 8 місяців тому +278

    how dare you complain about a diversity hire without diversity hires we wouldn't have airplane parts scattered across the countryside

    • @Hentai-Semite
      @Hentai-Semite 8 місяців тому

      Just wait until you realise how much damage those hires bring in Medicine/Surgeries.

    • @MrRichMurphy
      @MrRichMurphy 8 місяців тому

      Dems loooove diversity but demand all Blk people act & vote the same. Demand you celebrate them while shaming people for being Wht, male, 🇺🇸. But support 🇵🇸 that still has slavery & the ones that captured the African slaves sold around the world if not Muslims. They support people that hate them & tell them they want them ended. They light themselves up yelling. Free 🇵🇸 my skins my sin. They’re totally not just shields & it’s not a cult. For women just not the ones being trafficked into slavery at Biden’s border, Jewish women & children of Oct7.

    • @docsavage8640
      @docsavage8640 8 місяців тому +19

      That's the scary fact no one wants to discuss.

    • @fightrrrrr
      @fightrrrrr 8 місяців тому +3

      What????

    • @johnkellet9245
      @johnkellet9245 8 місяців тому +7

      😅😅😅😅

  • @lesliefuller1456
    @lesliefuller1456 8 місяців тому +154

    This is exactly why the constitution exists. The founding fathers knew what they were doing.

    • @fleur-de-rocaille
      @fleur-de-rocaille 8 місяців тому

      But unfortunately they hadn't any idea about how corrupted the descendants will be.

    • @Handlelesswithme
      @Handlelesswithme 8 місяців тому

      @@fleur-de-rocailleyou mean they figured people would stay as bl00d thirsty as they were in the 1700s

    • @michaelshapiro1543
      @michaelshapiro1543 8 місяців тому

      WHEREAS....

  • @njg26.gustav12
    @njg26.gustav12 8 місяців тому +84

    DEI at it's finest...
    Absolutely absurd.

  • @jerrysolomon7623
    @jerrysolomon7623 8 місяців тому +99

    The Bill of Rights is ment to stop government over reach.

    • @federalistpapers4523
      @federalistpapers4523 8 місяців тому

      KJB doesn't respect that fact. She thinks government should have complete control of every aspect of our lives, and we should have none. Grotesque ideology seated on our USSC.

    • @unbreakable7633
      @unbreakable7633 8 місяців тому +5

      Unfortunately James Madison was right: adopting the Bill of Rights actually limited our rights to the ones on that list. He said, opposing the Bill of Rights, we have liberty and not a list of rights.

    • @bunk13
      @bunk13 8 місяців тому

      @@unbreakable7633 What Madison said might be true in theory, but as little protection as the Bill of Rights provides, if it weren't there, we'd have overt government censorship, gun bans, etc. Madison assumed that courts would adhere to the Constitution. Progressivism is based on the idea that what progressives want overrides what a bunch of Dead White Males wrote.

    • @stewiesaidthat
      @stewiesaidthat 8 місяців тому +1

      The 10th Amendment exists to enumerate unenumerated rights.
      The problem is that the constitution is so spaghettified now that the government has virtually all control via the 14th and 16th Amendments.

    • @UndertakerU2ber
      @UndertakerU2ber 8 місяців тому

      @@unbreakable7633
      The 9th amendment was added so that the lack of acknowledgement of a certain right in the Bill of Rights isn’t proof that it doesn’t exist.
      Not the best example, but when the radical left makes arguments about how we have “rights” to free food, free healthcare, abortion, etc., it isn’t a good argument to say “Well, the constitution doesn’t mention anything about this, so that means those ‘rights’ are invalid.” Our response should be framed in a way where we explain _why_ those aren’t natural rights the same way that the freedom of expression is.

  • @thadgomez8904
    @thadgomez8904 8 місяців тому +310

    SHE IS UNQUALIFIED AND SHOULD NEVER EVER BEEN A JUDGE PERIOD AND SHOULD BE REMOVED !!!

    • @JohnSmith-ux3tt
      @JohnSmith-ux3tt 8 місяців тому +20

      Another Democrat virtue signal.

    • @justaminute3111
      @justaminute3111 8 місяців тому

      No. If that were to happen, the Left would weaponize it. They already think that it would be perfectly okay to pack the court.

    • @geoffreysmommy
      @geoffreysmommy 8 місяців тому

      Don't forget Biden said he was going to pick a black woman. Not he picked who he thought was the most qualified. It happens to be a black woman. Top on his list for who he was looking for was a black woman.

    • @perpitraiter
      @perpitraiter 8 місяців тому +10

      How do you go about removing this truly dangerous person from this essential post intended to insure the survival of the republic?

    • @MsPardal123
      @MsPardal123 8 місяців тому +5

      Binder nominates Kamala too 😂

  • @davidcaunter5346
    @davidcaunter5346 8 місяців тому +41

    As if people needed another reason to vote for President Trump. We can’t afford to have any more rubber-stamp democrats on the Supreme Court. 🙄

  • @sunilbishun2743
    @sunilbishun2743 8 місяців тому +301

    She also does not know what a woman is. Go figure.

    • @Dane-o7q
      @Dane-o7q 8 місяців тому +18

      Her name is TOKEN!

    • @RCenal
      @RCenal 8 місяців тому

      Well she is no biologist
      Despite knowing she's a woman
      But hey

    • @Eddie87Grant
      @Eddie87Grant 8 місяців тому +1

      @@Dane-o7q True story!!!

    • @oliverheaviside2539
      @oliverheaviside2539 8 місяців тому +2

      Why should she? She’s not a biologist! 🙄

    • @stephenbrecht1696
      @stephenbrecht1696 8 місяців тому +5

      That should have disqualified her right there and then!

  • @johnlerner5346
    @johnlerner5346 8 місяців тому +91

    FJB! - If he's Competent Charge Him for Insurrection!
    If he's Incompetent, Impeach him and Charge him for Treason!

    • @Vinnnne
      @Vinnnne 8 місяців тому +6

      Capital punishment

  • @willswalkingwest7267
    @willswalkingwest7267 8 місяців тому +203

    Her name is Khetanji Brown Jackson.
    She's an affirmative action hire.
    That's all anyone needs to know.
    Ketanji.
    Yeah.
    Right.

  • @docsavage8640
    @docsavage8640 8 місяців тому +37

    Gee, who would have guessed the Affirmative Action justice would be unqualified for the job?

  • @patcartledge4485
    @patcartledge4485 8 місяців тому +66

    Positive proof that being “educated” is not necessarily a sign of intelligence.

    • @michellehughes576
      @michellehughes576 8 місяців тому +3

      You mean indoctrinated not the same as educated

    • @nancygawlowicz2562
      @nancygawlowicz2562 8 місяців тому

      The Affirmative Action students don't need to get an education. It's enough that they exist to fill the quota for their college, and then get pushed on from there to fill higher Affirmative Action positions.

  • @georgeclarke2258
    @georgeclarke2258 8 місяців тому +176

    She’s a DEI hire, her competence is unimportant

    • @dcsc2007
      @dcsc2007 8 місяців тому +8

      Just like K.J.P.

    • @karenzaranski9814
      @karenzaranski9814 8 місяців тому +5

      So sick of this nonsense

    • @peterjermey7235
      @peterjermey7235 8 місяців тому

      She's *by far* the most qualified of the Supreme Court. Usually they choose party hacks with no real Court experience

    • @bobmyself8819
      @bobmyself8819 8 місяців тому

      She is a D.I.E. hire , she is killing our legal system.

    • @bobmyself8819
      @bobmyself8819 8 місяців тому

      ​@@peterjermey7235lol righttttt. You are so indoctrinated, guess the government got their money's worth

  • @__Diagnosis
    @__Diagnosis 8 місяців тому +119

    Another nail to end freedom of speech in the US

    • @RCenal
      @RCenal 8 місяців тому +1

      Yup
      That's the idea

  • @phcusnret
    @phcusnret 8 місяців тому +242

    She understands it. Her job is to destroy it.

    • @breezybreeze12
      @breezybreeze12 8 місяців тому +20

      Bingo

    • @federalistpapers4523
      @federalistpapers4523 8 місяців тому +23

      FKJB, FJB , and FKJP, these acrimonious individuals are a threat to this nation.

    • @josephgallagher945
      @josephgallagher945 8 місяців тому

      The State already has a new constitution for when they financially destroy America & we are forced into the North American Union with Canada & Mexico. Guess which parts will be missing?

    • @alanbosse5153
      @alanbosse5153 8 місяців тому +13

      100%

    • @realtalk7547
      @realtalk7547 8 місяців тому

      Exactly. If her willful ignorance about the nature of what a woman would be is any indication of her broader ideology then she is of the notion that the constitution was written by old white men and therefore outdated and needs scrapped.

  • @_Peremalfait
    @_Peremalfait 8 місяців тому +24

    Um, the very purpose of the Constitution, and most especially the Bill of Rights, is to "hamstring" the government.

  • @federalistpapers4523
    @federalistpapers4523 8 місяців тому +61

    This ignoramus Justice is hamstringing the USSC from following the rule of law without political bias.

    • @unbreakable7633
      @unbreakable7633 8 місяців тому

      All 9 are nothing but political hacks. Read Randy Barnett's books on how much damage bad Supreme Courts have done to the real Constitution during the last 75 years.

  • @ac9559
    @ac9559 8 місяців тому +46

    When people are chosen based on identity and not competence, it is not surprising when their incompetence is revealed.

    • @GinaTaglioli-vi5pn
      @GinaTaglioli-vi5pn 8 місяців тому

      Just look @ Traitor Joe!! INSTALLING an unfit POTUS has Consciquences!!

    • @alviverdeus
      @alviverdeus 8 місяців тому

      Like Clarence Thomas and Amy Barrett? They brought the thinnest professional resumes by far at the time of their appointments.

    • @ac9559
      @ac9559 8 місяців тому +3

      So you admit she was unqualified. Let me guess, you are on the left and trying to pivot away from the subject at hand. @@alviverdeus

    • @alviverdeus
      @alviverdeus 8 місяців тому

      @@ac9559 Nope. She had much stronger qualifications than either.

    • @RCenal
      @RCenal 8 місяців тому +2

      ​@@alviverdeusno she didn't
      If she is not understanding the constitution and what it means she is not qualified
      Thank you

  • @DragonToothless2517
    @DragonToothless2517 8 місяців тому +138

    She was hired by DIVERSITY, not intelligence.

  • @762x69
    @762x69 8 місяців тому +40

    Wait until she finds out what the 2nd amendment is meant to do... :)

  • @tparis4475
    @tparis4475 8 місяців тому +76

    barak obama said the same thing about the whole constitution

    • @seriousmonkey5654
      @seriousmonkey5654 8 місяців тому

      Learn how to write.

    • @_wokeweaklingscryoverwords_
      @_wokeweaklingscryoverwords_ 8 місяців тому

      @@seriousmonkey5654 Barrack Hussein Obama is responsible for abusing the U.S Constitution.

    • @ivorleak8823
      @ivorleak8823 8 місяців тому +8

      @@seriousmonkey5654 seemed fine but you do you x

    • @seriousmonkey5654
      @seriousmonkey5654 8 місяців тому

      Oh but sometimes it is.@@asmith8603

    • @keith3970
      @keith3970 8 місяців тому

      Quit trolling.

  • @P-CROZIER
    @P-CROZIER 8 місяців тому +39

    Always a Pleasure to listen to you Rita and your Guests, Thank You for speaking and sharing Truth 👏🏽👏🏽

  • @sgraham4533
    @sgraham4533 8 місяців тому +31

    She also didn’t know what a woman was.

    • @joeltrefethren8134
      @joeltrefethren8134 8 місяців тому

      When she failed to be able to define a woman alone and was accepted by the BAR they failed to hold any special titles. This is according to the Bouvier's Law dictionary which must adhere to. She is a corporate fraud pushing bias.

  • @gracechapel2464
    @gracechapel2464 8 місяців тому +13

    If one can't define what a woman is how can one be trusted to protect women's rights?

  • @tedmoser3657
    @tedmoser3657 8 місяців тому +16

    That's DEI in action! "It would hamstring government", yeah, that's the whole point!

  • @MrThelittleguy903
    @MrThelittleguy903 8 місяців тому +20

    The Founders wrote the Bill of Rights not to inform the People of their God given rights but to in.form the government of the line it cannot cross

    • @ladyalaina42
      @ladyalaina42 8 місяців тому

      Actually it is to do both.

  • @andyquelch5754
    @andyquelch5754 8 місяців тому +19

    What do you expect. She doesn't even know what a woman is because she's not a biologist

  • @FatGuyinaLittleWoods
    @FatGuyinaLittleWoods 8 місяців тому +38

    I hope Neil Young will remember, a Southern man don’t need him around anyhow

    • @joeltrefethren8134
      @joeltrefethren8134 8 місяців тому

      Woke and hippies are the exact same clowns. Woke distracted everyone while Americans quietly sleep walked into war. Niel Young is licking his lips and rolling his fists thinking about it .

    • @Gitn2it
      @Gitn2it 8 місяців тому +5

      Neil found out that he's not as popular as he thought he was, and his boycott didn't change anything except make him poorer.

    • @FatGuyinaLittleWoods
      @FatGuyinaLittleWoods 8 місяців тому

      @@Gitn2it indeed

    • @joeltrefethren8134
      @joeltrefethren8134 8 місяців тому

      @@Gitn2it Woke and hippys are two sides of the same clown show. The peace movement is very financially lucrative. Mr. Young is working that grift through the military industrial complex he is a retarded clown.

    • @auntlala4971
      @auntlala4971 8 місяців тому +2

      I remember when that song came out ..Neil Young still sux..(southern man)

  • @johnamerican1578
    @johnamerican1578 8 місяців тому +16

    Amazing how many people have gotten advanced in life simply by CHECKING OFF THE BOXES! Not for intelligence!

  • @hrbeta
    @hrbeta 8 місяців тому +22

    When “thinking black” is both your highest achievement and your biggest handicap. 😢

  • @proadymx1
    @proadymx1 8 місяців тому +8

    Ketanji is a product of afirmative action

  • @williammurdock5709
    @williammurdock5709 8 місяців тому +9

    "My problem is your view has the First Amendment hamstringing the government in the most important times..." Every single tenet of the Bill of Rights IS to hamstring the government, by DESIGNED. Her concern is supposed to be for citizens, not for the government. But this is the exact reason she was nominated to the bench in the first place, to weaken individual rights and empower government.

  • @marymurphy937
    @marymurphy937 8 місяців тому +8

    She understands it is all right, but her loyalty is to the criminal who appointed her, and not to the Constitution.

  • @sarinulek6816
    @sarinulek6816 8 місяців тому +10

    She is all about the power of the state..not the constitution which is self empowerment of the people.. The document only outlines rights that are inalienable, they arent decreed by the document itself.

  • @johnnymaccool9828
    @johnnymaccool9828 8 місяців тому +9

    It’s a sad state of affairs in the USA .

  • @michaelward9880
    @michaelward9880 8 місяців тому +3

    Grotesque is an accurate description of Ketinji Brown in the U.S. Supreme Court. GROTESQUE!!

  • @kevinbratcher2221
    @kevinbratcher2221 8 місяців тому +7

    The problem with the dems is they forgot who they are paid by, who they represent, and who they are supposed to respect, the people.

  • @hollowpointdaze7363
    @hollowpointdaze7363 8 місяців тому +3

    We have a so called President that doesn’t understand the Constitution either

  • @michaelluppino8637
    @michaelluppino8637 8 місяців тому +4

    This is an activist, not a judge.

  • @bradmoyer9737
    @bradmoyer9737 8 місяців тому +6

    She understands it perfectly, that’s why she is trying so hard to subvert it.

  • @chuckinthesprings1971
    @chuckinthesprings1971 8 місяців тому +4

    K Brown isn’t fit to be a judge at a dog show, much less be on the Supreme Court!

  • @MargaretMcCarty-x9i
    @MargaretMcCarty-x9i 8 місяців тому +4

    She is not qualified.

  • @ibelieveitcauseiseentit9630
    @ibelieveitcauseiseentit9630 8 місяців тому +2

    She says she's not a biologist so she's not qualified to say what a man or woman it is. But then she accepts awards for being the first black female supreme Court Justice.

  • @k.k.marriott5901
    @k.k.marriott5901 8 місяців тому +8

    She was a mercy vote not qualified

  • @petersprague7426
    @petersprague7426 8 місяців тому +5

    Correction: she understands the constitution perfectly well but intentionally seeks to subvert it. These people are very intelligent and know exactly what they are doing and hope to accomplish.

  • @falcorthewonderdog2758
    @falcorthewonderdog2758 8 місяців тому +4

    Ignorance of the law is no excuse

  • @willmorrisusa
    @willmorrisusa 8 місяців тому +2

    She doesn't know " what a Woman is "..... How is she gonna know the Constitution ? 😶 😞

  • @neilmartin99
    @neilmartin99 8 місяців тому +3

    Token hire only appointed because of skin color and gender.
    She didn't earn it.
    FJB

  • @Noitisnt-ns7mo
    @Noitisnt-ns7mo 8 місяців тому +1

    She was the one who didn't know the difference between a man and a woman and congress was the one who did not think that was a concern about accepting her as an adjudicator of truth and justice ("Just Us").

  • @TrojanLuver7
    @TrojanLuver7 8 місяців тому +6

    Male- Female - so confusing!!

  • @dorcassutton1446
    @dorcassutton1446 8 місяців тому +1

    And when all the assets are seized who will pay the employees working at these establishments or taxes due? The city? State? Ms Jackson? Other taxpayers?

  • @lisadakar9928
    @lisadakar9928 8 місяців тому +1

    She was unable to define what a woman is...why would she be required to be knowledgeable about the Constitution???

  • @rosemarieneill7608
    @rosemarieneill7608 8 місяців тому +2

    Scary when a Supreme Court judge doesn’t even know what the Supreme Court is all about. But we know why she was placed there. Color and gender.

  • @AndrewWilliams-kw6bc
    @AndrewWilliams-kw6bc 8 місяців тому +11

    DEI !

  • @ramonmirabal101
    @ramonmirabal101 8 місяців тому +2

    Nowadays positions are filled by color, not qualifications.

  • @Messier45_Pleiades
    @Messier45_Pleiades 8 місяців тому +3

    Affirmative Action before your hours.

  • @rightlyso8507
    @rightlyso8507 8 місяців тому +2

    Ketanji Jackson wasn't named to the Supreme Court for her intelligence. That's for sure. I doubt if she was even be able to spell the word, "supreme".

  • @jerryweiser1145
    @jerryweiser1145 8 місяців тому +4

    Thats why Trump needs reelected. FJBLGB

  • @victorhauk5973
    @victorhauk5973 8 місяців тому +3

    Censorship only promotes ignorance. Government censorship is authoritarian

  • @billbailey55
    @billbailey55 8 місяців тому +1

    She proved that she's unqualified for the job and should be immediately dismissed

  • @PhonePhone-bz2ql
    @PhonePhone-bz2ql 8 місяців тому +1

    Did she really say that? Thats hard to believe. The first amendment is specifically designed to limit governments interfering in our lives.not the other way around.

  • @bradcruise6291
    @bradcruise6291 8 місяців тому +2

    She is a DEI hire We all know that she never would have gotten this position on merit. It's shameful that such an unqualified person can hold such a high position

  • @sammygreen5813
    @sammygreen5813 8 місяців тому +1

    It is unbelievable that someone like this is on the supreme court! Oh yes, I forgot joey nominated her FJB!

  • @425HP
    @425HP 8 місяців тому +1

    She got the honor from brandon as being "the smartest Supreme Court Justice" So, she gets put in the same category of "The smartest person he knows is Hunter". That is all you need to know to realize just what kind of diversity hire she really is. I wish the follow-up question to "What is a woman?" would have been, Okay so as your not a biology expert, what are you? A man or a woman? I would have loved to see her try to squirm out from that one.

  • @menow.
    @menow. 8 місяців тому +2

    They missed a golden opportunity when confronting Jackson over the definition of a WOMAN. They should have asked her if SHE is a WOMAN, and then followed up with: "How do you know you are a WOMAN?"

  • @Dm-pk5oz
    @Dm-pk5oz 8 місяців тому +1

    She understands it just fine. She is there to help work around it.

  • @Lordy2020
    @Lordy2020 8 місяців тому +1

    The first ammendment applies to justices too. Even when they are grotesquely unqualified to interpret the 1st amendment. ❤

  • @davidconley2470
    @davidconley2470 8 місяців тому +1

    The Australians understand our constitution better than a Supreme Court Justice.

  • @pacarter7169
    @pacarter7169 8 місяців тому +1

    Well she was appointed by Biden… that alone should tell you volumes regarding her character!
    But then I had seen the hearing of her application for the Supreme Court position, of which Ted Cruz rejected her straight off… so who allowed her in?

  • @kkampy4052
    @kkampy4052 8 місяців тому +1

    The one thing the SCOTUS is supposed to do is know constitution and make judgements based on that. It's like putting a football ref behind the plate at a baseball game.

  • @jillatherton4660
    @jillatherton4660 8 місяців тому +3

    TY Both.

  • @LK-mo8bj
    @LK-mo8bj 8 місяців тому +2

    She is a clown. I'm more concerned about the comments from middle ground justices Kavanaugh and Roberts. They sound like they support the censorship by government. Only Alito had any sense in his comments.

  • @alan380
    @alan380 8 місяців тому +1

    Well, she's black, so that doesn't matter. It was stated by FJB that he only hired her because she was a black female.

  • @perpitraiter
    @perpitraiter 8 місяців тому +2

    Congressman Jordan recognized and commented on this most serious blunder committed by the justice. The question is does he recognize the seriousness of the blunder and is he going to do something to remove this obvious threat to our republic?

  • @Ivan.A.Churlyuski
    @Ivan.A.Churlyuski 8 місяців тому +1

    Wow a democrat not believing in the constitution? Shocking.. 😒

  • @America1st21
    @America1st21 8 місяців тому +3

    Ketangi Brown is a Barrack soldier. PERIOD.

    • @michaelshapiro1543
      @michaelshapiro1543 8 місяців тому

      And probably a barracks soldier - NEVER to be seen on a field of battle.

    • @America1st21
      @America1st21 8 місяців тому

      @@michaelshapiro1543Barrack Hussain soldier

  • @mikeogden5256
    @mikeogden5256 8 місяців тому +1

    That’s the point

  • @rjmprod
    @rjmprod 8 місяців тому +1

    I think she does understand. She was just the wrong pic for a Supreme Court justice. She’s definitely biased….!

  • @larrymiller4
    @larrymiller4 8 місяців тому +2

    She has it completely backwards. The Constitution and the Bill of Rights are supposed to HAMSTRING (limit) THE GOVERNMENT from infringing on the inalienable rights of the People.

  • @peggychamberlain9515
    @peggychamberlain9515 8 місяців тому +1

    Just another incompetent DEI hire!!

  • @benjaminvagg8514
    @benjaminvagg8514 8 місяців тому +4

    She’s the new NPC Agent Smith, the matrix is evolving.

  • @appalachiatiger
    @appalachiatiger 8 місяців тому +1

    She needs to step down.
    She is not intelligent enough to be sitting on the high court.
    How in the Haiti did she get that appointment?
    Anyone can see she isnt tje brightest cookie in the room.

  • @SeniorDrummer
    @SeniorDrummer 8 місяців тому

    God Bless this man ! Always enjoy what Dr. Saad has to say ! And he has a great sense of humor . And Rita, I love your videos and have a big crush on you .

  • @Nancy-uc2tu
    @Nancy-uc2tu 8 місяців тому +1

    Jackson was elected as a yes man.

  • @johncampbell7219
    @johncampbell7219 8 місяців тому +1

    DEI for the “win” folks. We knew this would happen from day one.

  • @bobbyscott8024
    @bobbyscott8024 8 місяців тому

    Great interview Rita! Very refreshing! Fron N.C., USA

  • @Alteringrealitystudios
    @Alteringrealitystudios 8 місяців тому +2

    And that's why she was chosen.

  • @maxfalconi6995
    @maxfalconi6995 8 місяців тому +2

    She couldn't define a woman

  • @williamharvey4732
    @williamharvey4732 8 місяців тому +1

    She does not know what a woman is either ? Welcome to DC Mz Brown.

  • @GinaTaglioli-vi5pn
    @GinaTaglioli-vi5pn 8 місяців тому +1

    Dont forget she also Represented the Taliban in US courts!!

  • @doubleboe7NYC
    @doubleboe7NYC 8 місяців тому +1

    DEI = Didn't Earn It

  • @mmayes9466
    @mmayes9466 8 місяців тому

    That why she was such an outstanding pick ! !

  • @micwell2247
    @micwell2247 14 днів тому

    needs to be read to her then

  • @Dianne-i8r
    @Dianne-i8r 8 місяців тому +13

    And,she remains there,hurting all of us…

  • @Jimboslice911
    @Jimboslice911 8 місяців тому +1

    Neil Young... Sellout as always.

  • @todafett5865
    @todafett5865 8 місяців тому +5

    So? She’s an independent Whamen of Kolour

  • @jossgower
    @jossgower 8 місяців тому

    Doesn't understand "Oath" and that if you you breach it you agree to forego all mercy.

  • @george-b3i-d2d
    @george-b3i-d2d 8 місяців тому

    never should have been appointed to the Scotus

  • @DirkVanwyk-zq3by
    @DirkVanwyk-zq3by 8 місяців тому

    So true,you can't say I believe in the first amendment,BUT???that is so stupid?

  • @beverleecarrell510
    @beverleecarrell510 8 місяців тому +1

    The Communist..