IRAC is the most common paradigm for writing law school essay exams. This video explains IRAC and the most common mistakes students make in applying it.
I am currently studying LLB Law in the UK and have had the unfortunate experience of working on a task where we were advised to use the IRAC method after our group had already submitted the work. You can only imagine how many "mistakes " were made since we did not follow any set format. Thanks for your detailed explanation it is very helpful.
I have watched lots of videos, but none is as detailed and well explained as this. This is really helpful. Thank you very much. Please keep the videos coming.
Perform legal reasoning: General overview: Be exposed to facts that a client brings , determine what legal issues arise from those facts. What constitutes a single issue? Apply the facts and the fact pattern to the rule. Analysis/application section is where: you make analogies (similarities) & distinctions (differences) State only the rules that pertain to the issue. The cases you have read corroborating Conclusion, what would a court likely conclude on the issue, tend to do/conclude Conclusion in line/parallel to analysis , which will show that what you wrote is strong, so conclude on what a court will likely hold for each issue
I am currently studying LLB Law in the UK and have had the unfortunate experience of working on a task where we were advised to use the IRAC method after our group had already submitted the work. You can only imagine how many "mistakes " were made since we did not follow any set format. Thanks for your detailed explanation it is very helpful.
I have watched lots of videos, but none is as detailed and well explained as this. This is really helpful. Thank you very much. Please keep the videos coming.
Thank you!! I am currently working on Laws of Cyberspace and Laws of Evidence so I was overwhelmed. You're appreciated!!
I really enjoyed this video because I have been struggling with identifying whether to smoosh or go deep. Well, let me get deep in practicing now.
Sometimes you gotta go deep, sometimes you gotta smoosh. Judgment call. Get practicing your deep v smoosh!
I was just introduced to this concept for my Legal Business class.
It is really useful for a newcomer in the JD program! Thanks a lot!
You are very welcome! Thanks for the positive comment!
@@BizLaw thanks
This is great. Quite helpful.
I like you very much the way you elaborate
Thank you so much for this great lesson.
Great explanation. Thanks Prof
I'm doing my assignment now a days so I'll use this... Thanks
The same here😂
Professor, I am going to use this methods so I can understand more about it?
Thanks. You helped me a lot with my exam and also you are handsome.
Perform legal reasoning:
General overview:
Be exposed to facts that a client brings , determine what legal issues arise from those facts.
What constitutes a single issue?
Apply the facts and the fact pattern to the rule.
Analysis/application section is where:
you make analogies (similarities) & distinctions (differences)
State only the rules that pertain to the issue.
The cases you have read corroborating
Conclusion, what would a court likely conclude on the issue, tend to do/conclude
Conclusion in line/parallel to analysis , which will show that what you wrote is strong, so conclude on what a court will likely hold for each issue
😀