This is an EXCELLENT way of explaining electron orbitals. If my chemistry teacher had employed that analogy I might have done better! Hats off to you!!!
Is there any need to know where an electron is (as in any physical application)? I have heard people mention its extremely hard to get a pic of an electron and the very act of trying to get a pic would get it out of the way.
I'm having a really heard time understanding these orbit and orbital related things. Thanks for uploading. Please solve more basic doubts,, And isn’t it the Px orbital?
Most like to be if you could measure its location. The electron exists in all those places all the time. Or there is no electron in the sense of a localized particle.
Hello, I have a question : if we "take two pictures" (measures ?) of an electron of two similar atoms (hydrogen ?) put in the exact same condition (time, temperature, "settings" ...) will the picture be the same ?
Incorporate a quantum electrodynamics model into alphafold, annotate existing trained reactions with electron orbitals, retrain those interactions and resulting proteins that are produced based off the QED model using the electron orbitals of the molecules formed at each reaction step, compare the results against one another for several reactions and molecules for validation, and then wonder at the brilliant new tool you've developed for the creation of (legal) novel pharmaceuticals that works based off of first principles calculations of quantum mechanical properties, and don't forget to bring it to me first so we can share the nobel prize :)
@@Anonymoose862 you are right, i guessed it by looking its shape but it is unclear wheter it is pz or something else but if i were to see this in an exam i would call it pz still
@@turpytb8473 yeah, even without an axis shown, if you added one where youd expect to see it it would absolutely be pz. I was just being nitpicky on the technicality
My chemistry professor used the annoying bug around a light source analogy The things moves too much to be caught but you can roughly know where it'll hang out
That's a 2p0 orbital (nlm = 2, 1 ,0). Anyone who's done a first year QM course will have studied Legendre polynomials and spherical harmonics. It's very beautiful that 18th C. maths should find an expression in 20th C. physics. The group of symmetries is Spin(3), hence fermions.
@@coc0a_mst Yeah, solutions to some interesting eigensystems turn out to be orthogonal polynomials (actually orthonormal for unitarity) like Laguerre, Hermite, Chebyshev etc.. This was a big chunk of our introductory quantum syllabus.
In classical mechanics the electron is not everywhere at the same time, we see it as everywhere because we the electrons are spinning too fast. In quantum mechanics however, electrons can be in superposition and are in all positions at once
my teachers neve explained that, I thought p orbital actually had a dumbbell shape. But it's a probability map. Due to all this I left chemistry and got into computer science.
@@ThreeTwentysix can't believe I remembered, it's been over 30 years since college! The shapes remind me of sand on a resonating metal plate.. if you can find shapes of metal that make the same shape patterns then probably make a great live visual! The points of sand , the patterns made the made by standing waves..
That's exactly right. In my other video, Cool Electronic Orbital Analogy ua-cam.com/video/c972t-C3PU4/v-deo.html, I link to a great demonstration of those plates. The big problem, as I say in that video, is that the sand is where the wave isn't, whereas electrons are where the waves are.
It's a nice analogy. However, if we consider the most commun interpretation of quantum mechanics, the electron occupies many different positions at the same time. The occupied positions are represented by the orbital cloud. It is only when the position of an electron is measured that it will occupy a specific position. The "denser" the cloud it, the most probable it is to find the electron there. When not measured and in a «stable» state (in an orbital), the electron cannot really occupy a specific location. Otherwise it would mean it is moving and it would then cause electromagnetic waves to be emmited constantly. The photo with all the people on it is the state of the electron. When measured, the photo changes and becomes the one with the person at a specific location.
My guy is over here making quantum physics intuitive! Great analogy sir!
Thanks!
😮
It's a p orbital being shown .heisenberg's wave eqn derives it theoretically
This is an EXCELLENT way of explaining electron orbitals. If my chemistry teacher had employed that analogy I might have done better! Hats off to you!!!
I had help, I guess, in that I did a physics A-Level at the same time as I did chemistry
O level A level chem teacher shouldn’t have known this. Otherwise, he/she would be teaching in University.
they dont
That cloud / crowd analogy was damn instructive. I'll always remember this way to explain it. It's perfect
Explanation was on point, with great analogy.
They didn't clear such doubts when I was in school.
Keep it up buddy.
Even though I studied chemistry, this has been the most intuitive explanation of electron orbitals I’ve ever seen
The plaza analogy is fantastic.
We use schrodinger's wave equation and heinsberg uncertainity principle and equation to predict electrons
Love your shorts😊
I found that thingbwith the 300 photos much more interesting than the waves of electrons :p
Thanks for simplifying it so well
Is this based on molecular orbital theory? Or VBT?
Is there any need to know where an electron is (as in any physical application)? I have heard people mention its extremely hard to get a pic of an electron and the very act of trying to get a pic would get it out of the way.
I'm having a really heard time understanding these orbit and orbital related things. Thanks for uploading. Please solve more basic doubts,,
And isn’t it the Px orbital?
Most like to be if you could measure its location. The electron exists in all those places all the time. Or there is no electron in the sense of a localized particle.
That was an awesome explanation 👏
Hello,
I have a question :
if we "take two pictures" (measures ?) of an electron of two similar atoms (hydrogen ?) put in the exact same condition (time, temperature, "settings" ...) will the picture be the same ?
Nice, thank you!😊
Bill Oddie + Richard Hammond = this guy
Oh wow
Wow. 👍
My chem teacher was terrible at explaining this when I was in highschool
I was trying to figure out if this was some sorta alien conspiracy rant
Kind of resembles magnetic fields
Most research was done by spinning objects on roulette.
Why do you think that?
This makes me wonder if spinning (in the real sense) an atom of muonium would forbid it from decaying
I don’t get it. You can prevent decays, by blocking final states via Pauli exclusion, or energy….but what’s your plan?
Pi orbital in a double bond i think
Py orbital
p orbital...px py or pz
That you named all 3 directions is funny.
py orbital
We are electron.
That's a p orbital?
Py
P orbital
the wave function is not real. its just a math way to predict actuality.. just my opinion
P- orbital? Guys correct me if I'm
p orbital
Its a p orbital
2p
Why do you look like someone with a knife is standing in front of you
Heh heh. Pee.
İt's a p
How can I use this information to make better drugs?
Incorporate a quantum electrodynamics model into alphafold, annotate existing trained reactions with electron orbitals, retrain those interactions and resulting proteins that are produced based off the QED model using the electron orbitals of the molecules formed at each reaction step, compare the results against one another for several reactions and molecules for validation, and then wonder at the brilliant new tool you've developed for the creation of (legal) novel pharmaceuticals that works based off of first principles calculations of quantum mechanical properties, and don't forget to bring it to me first so we can share the nobel prize :)
Pp😂😂
Very nice example sir
It is p orbital
Dumble shaped
pz i guess (since there are 3 p orbitals you should define which one it is)
@@turpytb8473 there isn't an axis, so you dont know its pz
@@Anonymoose862 you are right, i guessed it by looking its shape but it is unclear wheter it is pz or something else but if i were to see this in an exam i would call it pz still
@@turpytb8473 yeah, even without an axis shown, if you added one where youd expect to see it it would absolutely be pz. I was just being nitpicky on the technicality
@@jeremiahlethoba8254how is that a d orbital
p orbital
P orbital sir.❤
Got it!
A 2p orbital to be specific. 3p and higher have more lobes stacked on top of each other.
@@simonfalkner1682or rAther Pz or in z axis can be another way of telling
@@bide2505 No axes were shown so we can't be sure if it really is pz or just a rotated px/py
My chemistry professor used the annoying bug around a light source analogy
The things moves too much to be caught but you can roughly know where it'll hang out
That's a good one too
Yea ur teacher must be mexican
P orbital for sure
You got it!
P orbital.
You explain so well sir. I sense that you feel the topics rather than memorize.
That's a 2p0 orbital (nlm = 2, 1 ,0). Anyone who's done a first year QM course will have studied Legendre polynomials and spherical harmonics. It's very beautiful that 18th C. maths should find an expression in 20th C. physics. The group of symmetries is Spin(3), hence fermions.
too rich for my blood.
First year qm???
@@coc0a_mst Yeah, solutions to some interesting eigensystems turn out to be orthogonal polynomials (actually orthonormal for unitarity) like Laguerre, Hermite, Chebyshev etc.. This was a big chunk of our introductory quantum syllabus.
That is why science is superior to other subjects because we have such teachers and professors.😎😊
Love from India sir 😊
P orbital?
Your way of explaining orbitals with crowd was so good. Please keep up these videos! Also i think its the p orbital but i dont know orientation
The orientation doesn't matter until you've got something to compare it to.
Dude: excellent video. Unsolicited advice: if you wash up and do something - anything with your hair, your countenance will be less distracting.
it's a p orbital
Is a Gauss photo
P orbital
Pz ?
10 years too late for my chem exam
False. The electron is everywhere in that “cloud” . The cloud is the electron.
In classical mechanics the electron is not everywhere at the same time, we see it as everywhere because we the electrons are spinning too fast.
In quantum mechanics however, electrons can be in superposition and are in all positions at once
Yes, I recognise it.
It's a pair of bollocks.
Whered you get the camera and the pactagram graphicald spinditions
Thank you very much sir....😊
I appreciate it....❤
Remive the buffer ie a type of cimpressiin . Or lack.of.the enable.a.lightin mg bolt .
Looks like a 2p orbital.
So there are no electrons. Maybe positive neutron field.. or holes in lattices.
P-orbital
my teachers neve explained that, I thought p orbital actually had a dumbbell shape. But it's a probability map. Due to all this I left chemistry and got into computer science.
dude, people just walk in the shortest path 😂 going around a bench is already too tiring
My man looking like Ted Kaczynski with every new vid 😢
so it’s like a photo exposure but for atomic particles
Bro casually taught us attosecond physics
Back up from the camera a few millimeters please
I am so happy to finally visualize an atom
Then what does an atom look like at one point in time?
What an analogy. ❤
Why is Spiderman there💀
Holy that's a great analogy
p ,dumbell ,ungerade,nodal plane 1
It’s a p=Plaza orbital!
Thats a great analogy
A Py suborbital
P y
S orbital!?
Glorious pz
Briliant
P?
Bang on!
@@ThreeTwentysix can't believe I remembered, it's been over 30 years since college!
The shapes remind me of sand on a resonating metal plate.. if you can find shapes of metal that make the same shape patterns then probably make a great live visual! The points of sand , the patterns made the made by standing waves..
That's exactly right. In my other video, Cool Electronic Orbital Analogy ua-cam.com/video/c972t-C3PU4/v-deo.html, I link to a great demonstration of those plates. The big problem, as I say in that video, is that the sand is where the wave isn't, whereas electrons are where the waves are.
Sleep amigo
P orbital
P orbital
p orbital
Helium
Hydrogen?
S
P
P
huh?
S
P
It's a nice analogy. However, if we consider the most commun interpretation of quantum mechanics, the electron occupies many different positions at the same time. The occupied positions are represented by the orbital cloud.
It is only when the position of an electron is measured that it will occupy a specific position. The "denser" the cloud it, the most probable it is to find the electron there.
When not measured and in a «stable» state (in an orbital), the electron cannot really occupy a specific location. Otherwise it would mean it is moving and it would then cause electromagnetic waves to be emmited constantly.
The photo with all the people on it is the state of the electron. When measured, the photo changes and becomes the one with the person at a specific location.